PIR visible in MD04 even after shipment

HI Experts
In the the MRP stock requirement list, We have certain PIRs which are not consumed by the sales order even after the shipment of the Finished product . The PIR no still appears and is manually deleted . The Strategy Type is 40. Kindly advise . Your help will be highly appreciated . Many thanks in advance
With Best Regards
Ayaz Alam Khan

Dear ,
What was your Sales Order Qty ? Is it more than the PIR ? In Strategy 40 , if sales orders that exceed planned independent requirements can influence MRP planning result .Sale order will consider stock as well as PIR also will consider stock. If stock is not available, system will create planned order or PR.
Now , if your PIR is less than Sales Qty , then it will generate PR based on the Sales Order .
Available Stock : 20 pcs
Sales Order Requirement : 100 pc
PIR qty : 50
After MRP run , PR will (50-20) + 100 pc because of planning startgey 40 and Sale order will be fullfilled from total available stock qty .
Hope this is clear
Regards
JH

Similar Messages

Why are old PIR's not deleted even after doing MD74 & MD75??

Hi All,
In few materials; i am not able to delete old PIR's??
Even though i have performed MD74 & MD75 (which covers 2 days) i.e. whenever i do this; PIR's which are old than this limit are deleted, but there are few materials of 6-8 months still showing in MD04. Because of which there are major issues in MRP calculations..
I think in this case PIR's are seemed to be partly consumed...but i am not able to relate this.......please clarify and how can this problem be solved permanantly
Rgds

Hi Vicky Khabrani,
You can check with t code MD73 to see how the PIRs are related with sales orders. In the case of strategies like 40, 50 & 60 when SO is entered the SO consume the PIRs.
Subsequently if any of these SO are canceled or If the SO qty reduced, still the PIR will have the link with the SOs.
With the re-organisation function we can delete only those PIRs which are not linked with any SOs....
Regards,
Ramasamy

How come my external hard drive is no longer visible in finder even after ticking it in preferences? it shows in the disk utilities but does not allow me to find a problem or fix the problem? Please help.

it shows in the disk utilities but does not allow me to find a problem or fix the problem? Please help. also my external hard drive is a seagate free agent go, 500GB. it is visible on my tv but has no files in it… i'm scared i've lost everything?

Honestly i cannot remember sorry, i got it like 5 maybe 6 yrs ago and just started downloading things to it as the memory on the computer started filling up and when i wanted to see photos/videos on my TV.
My wife did tell me after i had written this post that she did try and record TV to it as it was plugged in. I think by doing so somehow has deleted everything. It reads on my TV yet has no files in it but won't show up on my computer. hope this helps.
Starting to think it is going to cost more to retrieve files on it than it will be to buy a newer and larger one.

PO approval Email not visible in SOST even after all settings intact

Hello All,
The 'PO requiring approval ' email is not visible in SAP since 10.11.2010.
The user decision task which sends a notification to approver regarding the approval has been going successfully for two yrs and now suddenly since 10 Nov 2010, it stopped. The workflow log does not show any error. Also the settings in SWN_CONFIG have not changed since 2008. The approvers have their correct email Ids set in SU01. Even the jobs 'SWNSELSEN' and 'SAPCONNECT' are scheduled and running successfully and sending emails for all other sap notifications.
Suddenly they have stopped sending notifications for this particular issue.
Please help me, where to look for. Are there any services involved other than these settings.
Awaiting eagerly for the solution.
Neha

Hi Neha,
How you are sending mails for dialog workitem?
Are you using the email send step inside the workflow or you using the batchjob to send the mails (send task description as mail via batchjob).
Id using the batchjob check the that task is present in the selection criteria.
(report to send mail is RSWUWFML)
-Swapnil.
Edited by: Swapnil Pawar on Nov 18, 2010 9:03 AM

Plugin not visible in Reader even after Certificate

I have made a Plug-in and have taken Digital certificate from Adobe. I am using SignPlugin to register and is getting the message "Plug-in name Successfully Reader- Enabled". Strangly still not finding Plugin in the Reader although is visible in Acrobat Pro.
One Problem I faced when converting from pro to Reder when I added "READER_PLUGIN" in the preprocessor as per documention. I start getting error for my earlier used method "PDDocSave(pdDoc, PDSaveCopy|PDSaveFull ,newPath, ASGetDefaultFileSys(), NULL, NULL);".
I am wondering I have taken queries for the same methos earlier alsio at "http://forums.adobe.com/thread/522488?tstart=0" , anyway I have commented this as as per error message headers are not matching. Plug-in is complied without any error and works only in Pro.
Am I still missing anything. Pl help

lrothenth,
I'm trying to help Amit with this issue. When we applied for the certificate, there was no mention of a particular release. When documentation and the certificate were sent, the body of the email had links for release 8 and for release 9 as to imply there were different procedures to apply based on the release being used; however, there was no mention that the certificate only worked on any given release.
I seem to remember going to the Adobe Support page and doing a general lookup for the MakeKey utility (and then downloading). That being said, I have no idea what version was used to create the keypair. I have subsequently pulled the MakeKey utility from the Adobe 9 SDK and have made a new key pair.
I wrote to RIKLA support on Friday asking about the release specific key and the response was - are you getting an error on the load? If not, then your certificate should be good. I emailed again this morning and have not heard a response as of 5:30 this evening.
I added an AVAlertNote as the first line of code in the init section. The alert shows straight away if using Pro or the browser plug-in (which currently points to Pro). Never shows if Reader.
One more question with regards to this, if we develop the plug-in using Adobe 9 SDK, does this mean our user base (over 3,000) will have to migrate to Reader 9 in order to use the plug-in? Not saying this is a big issue as my guess is 95+% of the base is already using 9. Just need to be prepared when we roll this out.
Thanks and Regards,
Steve

Requirement in MRP even after Sales order completely delivered/cleared

I see a sales order in md04 even after that order is already cleared completely delivered
I have checked the pGI quantity in order and document flow. everything matches and status is completed/cleared.
I also ran SDRQCR21 in se38 with data transfer checked. Still I am unable to delete that fake order from md04.
any help is appreciated.

Hello ,
Have you checked & followed all instructions in SAP note 207942.
"Generally you can solve these problems with report SDRQCR21from Note 25444. If not, these kinds of problems must be processed further in SD-BF-AC.
However, often the problem is also caused by the fact that
no requirements are generated at first or the generated requirements are only displayed but are not included in MRP calculation
or vice versa
due to the Customizing settings requirements are stored although this is not wanted from the business view. "
This is a release independent SAP note. so it applies to ECC6.0 as well.
Hope this helps you resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Ram

Navigation links are visible to all groups even after applying specific target audience group in to links at sharepoint 2010 publishing site

Hi ,
Any one please help me on why the global navigation links are visible to all group users even after applying a specific target audience group to the link. I Checked , User profile service and User profile synchronizing services
and they are running fine. Test environment is running fine even both the services are not running. Please let me know is any relation should be there between target audience and User profile services?
I am wondering that the Target Audience is not working in global navigation suddenly in production server and the same is working in test server.
Thanks & Regards,
NareshRaju YV,
Infosys.

Hi NareshRaju,
Did you add SharePoint Groups to Target Audience ? if yes please refer http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/7862f182-c6a2-4d2e-9025-b11514575ac3/audience-targeting-for-navigation-link-issue?forum=sharepointgenerallegacy and
you will get solution
Let us now if this helps, thanks
Regards,
Pratik Vyas | SharePoint Consultant |
http://sharepointpratik.blogspot.com
Posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights
Please remember to click Mark As Answer if a post solves your problem or
Vote As Helpful if it was useful.

File is visible in content server even after deletion

Hi
After a file has been deleted, it is still showing on the Search Results page. Although when I click on the Info button or the file Id, it shows the following error
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
How to ensure that the deleted file is also removed from the search results page?
Regards
Pradeep

When I do a collection rebuild, the following error occurs:
Indexing aborted at 8/4/13 10:50am. Aborting index build. Too many errors with finding and copying files to the appropriate place.
Due to failure of indexing, files are visible even after archiving. Please help.

How can make PIR in period of adjustment not visible in MD04

Dear guru ,
I have defined a period of adjustment for planned independent requirements.
These pir are visible in MD04 but they arenu2019t influent for mrp.
I want to make these pir not visible in MD04
I donu2019t want to delete the pir because I want to maintain history of planned and withdrawn quantity.
How can I do that ?
Thanks is advance.

Hi,
A suggestion:
Split the requirements into 2 lines (i.e. 2 versions), one line which is active, but does not contain the requirement which you do not want & the other which is not active & contains the reqmt which you do not want in MD04.
Regards,
Vivek

Spotlight stopped finding files, even after "index". They're visible files, not system files (like.jpg, .xls, .doc). This happened for no apperent reason.

Spotlight stopped finding files, even after "index". They're visible files, not system files (like.jpg, .xls, .doc). This happened for no apparent reason.
Worked well with Yosemite the first week, but now it doesn't.

Any advice would be helpful. Thanks

Process Order accepts Confirmation & GR from BAPI even after Confirmed

No matter what i try the formatting and CRLF go for a toss in this text.
Hi PPPI Gurus,
I am a beginner in this area and request your help.
We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
Case 1:
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only 100 is accepted.
2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
Case 2: (The one with the problem)
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only the 100 is accepted.
2. 25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
5. The Process order allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are same .
so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Suraj
Edited by: surajprabhu on Aug 17, 2009 6:37 AM

Hi,
The standard SAP will allow the GR even after the Final Confirmation. The Final Confirmation is acting as a agent to change the status of the process order to CNF. thats all.
If you want to restrict the GR then you have to do Enhancement with use the USer Exits. Pleas try to use the User Exits PPC00009 or MBCF0001,MBCF0005
thanks and regards
murugesan

Hi, download of the trial product (photoshop ele 13) does nt start even after successfully installing the Adobe download assistant successfully. Only .7z file is shown, .exe is nt available. Whn i try to extract .7z file wd 7-Zip error pops up " cannot ex

Hi, download of the trial product (photoshop ele 13) does nt start even after successfully installing the Adobe download assistant successfully. Only .7z file is shown, .exe file is nt visible. Whn i try to extract .7z file wd 7-Zip error pops up " cannot extract **.7z as archive" .I've tried fresh download of adobe photoshop ele 13 but same error occurs.
OS:Windows 8.1
Storage loc for adobe down assistant : C-Program file(x86)-Adobe download assistant-adobe
Storage loc for adobe down assistant: C- Adobe photoshop assistant 13- PhotoshopElements_13_LS25_win64_1. 7z
After this I try to extract ** .7z file but following error occurs :
After this I try to extract ** .7z file but following error occurs
Kindly Help.

Thanks fr revert !
After clicking on the provided link , Above error pops up. I clicked "ok" n allowed download to complete after which same previous error shows up!

Major crashes even after clean install. iCal/sqlite/MobileMe the culprit?

In 25 years of using Apple computers, I've never had problems like I'm having now.
My iMac was acting up severely with some strange symptoms such as:
* The red & white portion of the iCal icon in the dock disappearing, while the date itself remained visible.
* All kinds of 0K sqlite files showing up on the base level of the hard drive, and a lots of cfx pref files being generated (stuff like cfx#1t9Oiul -- these i understand to be corrupt pref files). The sqlite files, by the way, show up as things like etilqs_3HVA6IL9BWQtB9e
* Freezes, generally slow behavior, and multiple crashes, including the "blue screen of death" where the color just shifts and the cursor comes and goes. Eventually, even after running DiskWarrior, I the computer would start up, then spontaneously shut itself down after the grey apple screen with the progress wheel.
Ultimately, I decided to just wipe the thing clean and start fresh from a backup.
Using a Leopard install disk, I attempted to do the clean install, but was unable to from the iMac's internal optical drive - the installer told me the disk was damaged or dirty (the optical drive is brand new, by the way).
Using a powerbook and putting the iMac in target mode, I was able to do a completely clean install.
I ran all the software updates and have added NO third party software.
Problems are back:
Running a sync to get my calendar, contacts, and bookmarks back, I encountered my first problem again: address book wouldn't sync "due to inconsistent data" and told me to replace the data on the computer by resetting it -- which I attempted to do, multiple times, but the sync always failed.
Then , once again those sqlite files started showing up.
Then the iCal icon disappeared again and programs weren't responding. Moments ago I had to do a hard restart.
I've zapped the PRAM, I've tried everything I know, and I'm still having all these problems (some of which, by the way, are now beginning to occur on the PowerBook G4 I also have).
If anyone can provide me any guidance here, man would I love it. Is it possible the Leopard disk I have is somehow corrupted and is causing all these issues? Or is it hardware? Or is this some sort of problem that's being generated by synchronization?
I'm really at my wit's end.
Thanks to anyone who can give me a hand.
Jon

Just wanted to update anyone who's interested:
After replacing the internal hard drive, all problems have ceased and my Mac is running beautifully -- fast (though I also upgraded the ram from 1 to 2 GB) and I couldn't be happier.
So just a word to the wise: those "software" problems I was so certain I was having turned out to be a hard drive that was slowly failing. A friend of mine who's a programmer said he's never heard of a hard drive failing anything but suddenly, but in this case that's what happened.
With the problems I was having, I was seriously beginning to question my loyalty to Apple.
As it turns out, now I'm questioning their loyalty to Western Digital -- that drive was a dog and I'm glad to have replaced it with a Seagate.

ARQ: Manager/Role Owner can modify request details even after submitting the request???

Hi All,
I have noticed that after Submitting (Approving) a request, manager or role owner can still modify the user details (field are editable) like role validity date etc in a request. This is quite weird!
Although, after submitting a request by a requester, all field are disabled.
Has any one encountered with this problem? How can I control this?
Please advise.
Regards,
Faisal

Alessandro,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, I got it and that is why I got confused.
This EUP I have defined and the desired fields are visible and editable and seems to be working fine.
However, the problem is, even after submitting a request, manager and role owner is able to edit the values in the fields which is incorrect!
Actually, once a request is submitted, I believe request should be only display mode!
You know what, this is working absolutely fine with requester. Meaning, once a requester submits a request, then all fields are disabled and values in them can not be modified any more.
But I am not sure why this is not happening with managers/role owners.
Please advise.
Regards,
Faisal

The stock in transit field is not visible in MD04

Hi Team
Stock in transit visible on MD04
STPO 28801084 is internal stock transfer from FI25 to FI28.
Qty of PO is visible in the ´stock in transit´ field on SAO transaction MD04 under plant FI28
when corresponding delivery 1202400481 have been PGId at FI25 (2014/07/07)
Stock in transit NOT visible on MD04
STPO 28502250 is internal stock transfer from FI31 to FI28.
The ´stock in transit´ Qty of PO is not visible on MD04 under plant FI28.
even if the corresponding   delivery 1202323564 have been PGId at FI31 (2014/06/23)
Br, Kiran Unde

Hello
Please take a look on question 9 of the following FAQ note, which explains the standard system behavior:
549752 - FAQ: MRP elements in transaction MD04/MD05
9. Question: Why does the system not display stock in transit for stock
    transport orders with order confirmation (notified orders)?
    Answer:
    Purchase order confirmations do not have to match the original
    purchase order delivery schedule lines. Moreover, the purchase order
    confirmation (view MDLA in materials planning) does not contain the
    same information as the purchase order to determine the stock in
    transit. The display of the stock in transit is therefore not
    implemented for the purchase order confirmation in the materials
    planning evaluation transactions.
BR
Caetano

PIR visible in MD04 even after shipment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for