Pixelated images in different zoom levels

Hi, since yesterday I´ve got a mystic problem when zooming my images. In the 100% view the images look sharp, clear and smooth. But when I zoom out and reach the 30% the images is pixelated like there is to much sharpness in it. The view doesn´t smoth the edges and the image look very hard. This effect comes from one zoom level to another (alt + scroll mouse) and zoomong back the image is smoth again. In Lightroom the images look clear and smooth in every zoom level.
I´ve got an iMac 27" and OpenGL is activated. I´m using Photoshop CC and I think that at the beginning the problem wasn´t there, but since a view days it is...
Any ideas??
Best
Sven

You can scale the small clips up to the same size of the larger one... but you will get a quality loss.
Using Motion or Scale to Frame Size commands
Better to scale the large ones down to a Sequence that matches the smaller clip dimensions.

Similar Messages

How to setup a 'duplicate/mirror view' with a different zoom level?

Hi Photoshop Gurus,
I constantly keep zooming in and out of the same images. It drives me crazy to view it at normal zoom level and zoom back into deep pixels.
Is there a way so that I have a duplicate floating window/view that shows realtime editing of an image at a different zoom level? (Think of it like a display mirroring, but, I am trying to mirror the same document at a normal zoom level).
This is my scenario:
- I usually work with small images/icons.
- I zoom deeply into an image at pixel level ~3000%.
- Change some pixels and do editing
- Zoom back out to 100% to view how it looks normally.
- Repeat and repeat.
Can I always have a 100% zoomed view along side the same document?
Thanks for your help.
PHOTOSHOP CS5 Mac Snow Leopard

The navigator palette is just another document view. Open it, put it where you want, resize it, and you can use it to control (and see) what part of the docuemnt your zoomed in view is showing.

Different zoom levels for different clips in the same project?

Hi
I am making a movie with videos from two different cameras. As a result some of the clips are cut down in size to a small portion of the screen. This can be solved if it is possible to use different zoom levels for different clips in the same project. I have not been able to do this. Is it possible?
kind regards
Soren

You can scale the small clips up to the same size of the larger one... but you will get a quality loss.
Using Motion or Scale to Frame Size commands
Better to scale the large ones down to a Sequence that matches the smaller clip dimensions.

Getting images w/ different zoom/focal lengths to match up?

Hi! I recently shot some star trails the other day with a 20 second shutter speed. i ended up with around 150 pictures but when i went to blend them, the trails didn't match up! i later discovered that when i went outside to clean off the lens (which was every 10 mins) that i accidentally zoomed in a little each time i cleaned it (ranging from 11mm to 13.6mm). I put all the images into photoshop and blended the ones that were shot with the same focal length (i ended up with 5 layers)I was wondering if there was a way/feature or if you guys knew any tips or tricks that would crop the image and line it up to match the other trails for me automatically or help me crop the images to the right size. Thank you and any help is much appreciated!! (:

Do your images have any easily identifiable landmarks in the foreground - buildings, trees, etc.? If so, you could use the Measure tool, and figure the necessary scaling from there.

CS4 NOT capable of sharp displays at all zoom levels

I must have been asleep, until now, and missed the significance and importance of what follows.
In post #11 here:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/375478?tstart=30
on 19 March 2009 Chris Cox (Adobe Photoshop Engineer - his title on the old forums) said this, in a discussion regarding sharpness in CS4:
"You can't have perfectly sharp images at all zoom levels.". Unfortunately, my experience with CS4 since its release late last year has repeatedly confirmed the correctness of this statement.
What makes this statement so disturbing is that it contradicts an overwhelming amount of the pre- and post-release promotional advertising of CS4 by Adobe, to the effect that the OpenGL features of CS4 enable it to display sharp images at all zoom levels and magnifications. What is surprising is that this assertion has been picked up and regurgitated in commentary by other, sometimes highly experienced, Ps users (some unconnected with, but also some directly connected with, Adobe). I relied upon these representations when making my decision to purchase the upgrade from CS3 to CS4. In fact, they were my principal reason for upgrading. Without them, I would not have upgraded. Set out in numbered paragraphs 1 to 6 below is a small selection only of this material.
1. Watch the video "Photoshop CS4: Buy or Die" by Deke McClelland (inducted into the Photoshop Hall of Fame, according to his bio) on the new features of CS4 in a pre-release commentary to be found here:
http://fyi.oreilly.com/2008/09/new-dekepod-deke-mcclelland-on.html
Notice what he says about zooming with Open GL: "every zoom level is a bicubically rendered thing of beauty". That, when viewed with the zooming demonstrated, can only be meant to convey that your image will be "sharp" at all zoom levels. I'm sure he believes it too - Deke is someone who is noted for his outspoken criticism of Photoshop when he believes it to be deserved. It would seem that he must not have experimented and tested to the extent that others posting in this forum have done so.
2. Here's another Adobe TV video from Deke McClelland:
http://tv.adobe.com/#vi+f1584v1021
In this video Deke discusses the "super smooth" and "very smooth" zooming of CS4 at all zoom levels achieved through the use of OpenGL. From the context of his comments about zooming to odd zoom levels like 33.33% and 52.37%, it is beyond doubt that Deke's use of the word "smooth" is intended to convey "sharp". At the conclusion of his discussion on this topic he says that, as a result of CS4's "smooth and accurate" as distinct from "choppy" (quoted words are his) rendering of images at odd zoom levels (example given in this instance was 46.67%), "I can actually soft proof sharpening as it will render for my output device".
3. In an article by Philip Andrews at photoshopsupport.com entitled 'What's New In Adobe Photoshop CS4 - Photoshop 11 - An overview of all the new features in Adobe Photoshop CS4',
see: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/photoshop-cs4/what-is-new-in-photoshop-cs4.html
under the heading 'GPU powered display', this text appears :
"Smooth Accurate Pan and Zoom functions – Unlike previous versions where certain magnification values produced less than optimal previews on screen, CS4 always presents your image crisply and accurately. Yes, this is irrespective of zoom and rotation settings and available right up to pixel level (3200%)." Now, it would be a brave soul indeed who might try to argue that "crisply and accurately" means anything other than "sharply", and certainly, not even by the wildest stretch of the imagination, could it be taken to mean "slightly blurry but smooth" - to use the further words of Chris Cox also contained in his post #11 mentioned in the initial link at the beginning of this post.
4. PhotoshopCAFE has several videos on the new features of CS4. One by Chris Smith here:
http://www.photoshopcafe.com/cs4/vid/CS4Video.htm
is entitled 'GPU Viewing Options". In it, Chris says, whilst demonstrating zooming an image of a guitar: "as I zoom out or as I zoom in, notice that it looks sharp at any resolution. It used to be in Photoshop we had to be at 25, 50 , 75 (he's wrong about 75) % to get the nice sharp preview but now it shows in every magnification".
5. Here's another statement about the sharpness of CS4 at odd zoom levels like 33.33%, but inferentially at all zoom levels. It occurs in an Adobe TV video (under the heading 'GPU Accererated Features', starting at 2 min 30 secs into the video) and is made by no less than Bryan O'Neil Hughes, Product Manager on the Photoshop team, found here:
http://tv.adobe.com/#vi+f1556v1686
After demonstrating zooming in and out of a bunch of documents on a desk, commenting about the type in the documents which is readily visible, he says : "everything is nice and clean and sharp".
6. Finally, consider the Ps CS4 pdf Help file itself (both the original released with 11.0 and the revised edition dated 30 March 2009 following upon the release of the 11.0.1 update). Under the heading 'Smoother panning and zooming' on page 5, it has this to say: "Gracefully navigate to any area of an image with smoother panning and zooming. Maintain clarity as you zoom to invididual pixels, and easily edit at the highest magnification with the new Pixel Grid." The use of the word "clarity" can only mean "sharpness" in this context. Additionally, the link towards the top of page 28 of the Help file (topic of Rotate View Tool) takes you to yet another video by Deke McClelland. Remember, this is Adobe itself telling you to watch this video. 5 minutes and 40 seconds into the video he says: "Every single zoom level is fluid and smooth, meaning that Photoshop displays all pixels properly in all views which ensures more accurate still, video and 3D images as well as better painting, text and shapes.". Not much doubt that he is here talking about sharpness.
So, as you may have concluded, I'm pretty upset about this situation. I have participated in another forum (which raised the lack of sharp rendering by CS4 on several occasions) trying to work with Adobe to overcome what I initially thought may have been only a problem with my aging (but nevertheless, just-complying) system or outdated drivers. But that exercise did not result in any sharpness issue fix, nor was one incorporated in the 11.0.1 update to CS4. And in this forum, I now read that quite a few, perhaps even many, others, with systems whose specifications not only match but well and truly exceed the minimum system requirements for OpenGL compliance with CS4, also continue to experience sharpness problems. It's no surprise, of course, given the admission we now have from Chris Cox. It seems that CS4 is incapable of producing the sharp displays at all zoom levels it was alleged to achieve. Furthermore, it is now abundently clear that, with respect to the issue of sharpness, it is irrelevant whether or not your system meets the advertised minimum OpenGL specifications required for CS4, because the OpenGl features of CS4 simply cannot produce the goods. What makes this state of affairs even more galling is that, unlike CS3 and earlier releases of Photoshop, CS4 with OpenGL activated does not even always produce sharp displays at 12.5, 25, and 50% magnifications (as one example only, see posts #4 and #13 in the initial link at the beginning of this post). It is no answer to say, and it is ridiculous to suggest (as some have done in this forum), that one should turn off OpenGL if one wishes to emulate the sharp display of images formerly available.

Thanks, Andrew, for bringing this up. I have seen comments and questions in different forums from several CS4 users who have had doubts about the new OpenGL display functionality and how it affects apparent sharpness at different zoom levels. I think part of the interest/doubt has been created by the over-the-top hype that has been associated with the feature as you documented very well.
I have been curious about it myself and honestly I didn't notice it at first but then as I read people's comments I looked a little closer and there is indeed a difference at different zoom levels. After studying the situation a bit, here are some preliminary conclusions (and I look forward to comments and corrections):
The "old", non-OpenGL way of display was using nearest-neighbor interpolation.
I am using observation to come to this conclusion, using comparison of images down-sampled with nearest-neighbor and comparing them to what I see in PS with OpenGL turned off. They look similar, if not the same.
The "new", OpenGL way of display is using bilinear interpolation.
I am using observation as well as some inference: The PS OpenGL preferences have an option to "force" bilinear interpolation because some graphics cards need to be told to force the use of shaders to perform the required interpolation. This infers that the interpolation is bilinear.
Nothing is truly "accurate" at less than 100%, regardless of the interpolation used.
Thomas Knoll, Jeff Schewe, and others have been telling us that for a long time, particularly as a reason for not showing sharpening at less than 100% in ACR (We still want it though ). It is just the nature of the beast of re-sampling an image from discrete pixels to discrete pixels.
The "rule of thumb" commonly used for the "old", non-OpenGL display method to use 25%, 50%, etc. for "accurate" display was not really accurate.
Those zoom percentages just turned out to be less bad than some of the other percentages and provided a way to achieve a sort of standard for comparing things. Example: "If my output sharpening looks like "this" at 50% then it will look close to "that" in the actual print.
The "new", OpenGL interpolation is certainly different and arguably better than the old interpolation method.
This is mainly because the more sophisticated interpolation prevents drop-outs that occurred from the old nearest-neighbor approach (see my grid samples below). With nearest-neighbor, certain details that fall into "bad" areas of the interpolated image will be eliminated. With bilinear, those details will still be visible but with less sharpness than other details. Accuracy with both the nearest-neighbor and bilinear interpolations will vary with zoom percentage and where the detail falls within the image.
Since the OpenGL interpolation is different, users may need to develop new "rules of thumb" for zoom percentages they prefer when making certain judgements about an image (sharpening, for example).
Note that anything below 100% is still not "accurate", just as it was not "accurate" before.
As Andrew pointed out, the hype around the new OpenGL bilinear interpolation went a little overboard in a few cases and has probably led to some incorrect expectations from users.
The reason that some users seem to notice the sharpness differences with different zooms using OpenGL and some do not (or are not bothered by it) I believe is related to the different ways that users are accustomed to using Photoshop and the resolution/size of their monitors.
Those people who regularly work with images with fine details (pine tree needles, for example) and/or fine/extreme levels of sharpening are going to see the differences more than people who don't. To some extent, I see this similar to people who battle with moire: they are going to have this problem more frequently if they regularly shoot screen doors and people in fine-lined shirts. Resolution of the monitor used may also be a factor. The size of the monitor in itself is not a factor directly but it may influence how the user uses the zoom and that may in turn have an impact on whether they notice the difference in sharpness or not. CRT vs LCD may also play a role in noticeability.
The notion that the new OpenGL/bilinear interpolation is sharp except at integer zoom percentages is incorrect.
I mention this because I have seen at last one thread implying this and an Adobe employee participated who seemed to back it up. I do not believe this is correct. There are some integer zoom percentages that will appear less sharp than others. It doesn't have anything to do with integers - it has to do with the interaction of the interpolation, the size of the detail, and how that detail falls into the new, interpolated pixel grid.
Overall conclusion:
The bilinear interpolation used in the new OpenGL display is better than the old, non-OpenGL nearest-neighbor method but it is not perfect. I suspect actually, that there is no "perfect" way of "accurately" producing discrete pixels at less than 100%. It is just a matter of using more sophisticated interpolation techniques as computer processing power allows and adapting higher-resolution displays as that technology allows. When I think about it, that appears to be just what Adobe is doing.
Some sample comparisons:
I am attaching some sample comparisons of nearest-neighbor and bilinear interpolation. One is of a simple grid made up of 1 pixel wide lines. The other is of an image of a squirrel. You might find them interesting. In particular, check out the following:
Make sure you are viewing the Jpegs at 100%, otherwise you are applying interpolation onto interpolation.
Notice how in the grid, a 50% down-sample using nearest-neighbor produces no grid at all!
Notice how the 66.67% drops out some lines altogether in the nearest-neighbor version and these same lines appear less sharp than others in the bilinear version.
Notice how nearest-neighbor favors sharp edges. It isn't accurate but it's sharp.
On the squirrel image, note how the image is generally more consistent between zooms for the bilinear versions. There are differences in sharpness though at different zoom percentages for bilinear, though. I just didn't include enough samples to show that clearly here. You can see this yourself by comparing results of zooms a few percentages apart.
Well, I hope that was somewhat helpful. Comments and corrections are welcomed.

Saving a PDF at a certain zoom level

I have an Illustrator file that I want to save at different zoom levels (100% & 200%). I have to save these out to PDF's but once I open them Acrobat opens them to a certain dimension. Is there a way to manipulate the zoom and save feature in the document of Illustrator without having my users do it in Acrobat?

You can do it with a Batch processing in Acrobat. In Acrobat 9 it would be from Advanced>Document Processing>Batch Processing as follows

Comp viewer becomes flat blue at certain zoom levels

This is a problem I've had with several different versions of After Effects, and on more than one computer and I haven't been able to find any information about it.
Sometimes, especially after RAM previewing, my comp viewer will turn blue and I can't see my work unless I'm at a different zoom level. Sometimes after a while another zoom level will turn blue also.
I've tried purging, which solves the problem in the short term, but it tends to come after a short while. Thoughts? Thank you!

I see you have a Mac running AE CC 2014. If you're on Yosemite, you need to update AE so it works properly with AE. First thing to check.
I also see a frame rate of 23.98 in the preview panel. That's a non-existant frame rate in AE. It doesn't go by the mythical frame rate of 23.98, it uses the ACTUAL frame rate: 23.976. You should use it, too.

Photoshop CS6 - blurred/jagged picture at irregular zoom levels

I'm using Photoshop CS6 on a desktop running Windows 7 with AMD Radeon HD 6750 and I noticed that when I zoom at 66.7% or 33%, the pictures edges look "jagged"/blurry, etc. and the image only has a smooth rendering at 100%, 50%, 25%, etc.
I wouldn't ask about this except, I have the same exact version of Photoshop on my laptop, running Windows 7 with Intel's HD 4000 built-in graphics, and this computer displays smooth rendering of images at any zoom level, no matter what. So why the difference? The settings in the Preferences > Performance section is identical on both computers.

Yeah, sorry. Computer won't let me update the driver. First I installed the wrong one and crashed the computer, then I reinstalled the old one, downloaded the correct one, it installed, no crash, the computer restarted and it told me I had no driver, so I had to reinstall the old one. No hope of updating apparently. I hope that wasn't the solution to the Photoshop problem >.<
I also keep getting conflicting messages from my computer. Photoshop said I had the 6750, but Windows said I had the 5750. When the second install failed (of the 5750), Windows now tells me I have the 6750. I don't get it. But I guess this a question I should ask AMD.

Safari on rMBP has 200% zoom level by default when viewing standalone images.

I have a MacBook Air 13" Mid 2010 and recently purchased a MacBook Pro with Retina Display 15" Mid 2012. I have updated Safari to 6.0 on both machines, but here comes the problem when I use Safari to view a standalone image on my rMBP.
Normally when I view a standalone image on Safari, the zoom level is 100% which means I see the actual pixeles of the image. Once you open an image in a new tab or a new window, if the dimensions of the image is bigger than the window, let's say 5000x4000, the dimensions of the image will be adjusted to fit within the window. And then the cursor becomes a tiny circle with the "+" sign inside (sorry for my poor description, I hope you can get it) which is the zoom icon, by clicking the image you zoom to the actual pixels of the image which shows 100% of the image.
However this works on my MBA but it doesn't on my rMBP as the zoom level is 200% by default. The following web pages are the ones where I found to have the same problem and they have better explanations:
http://notes.jayrobinson.org/post/25599469833/the-images-above-show-safari-5-2-w ith-page-zoom-on
https://twitter.com/jayrobinson/status/214443964516937729
Sorry for the long post, but I just wonder if there is a way to fix the problem or if Apple can do it?

I've seen this reported before -- sometimes PSE needs to have the zoom set to even multiples of 25%. You can try searching Adobe's site to see if anyone has found a solution.
Ken

Images are always magnified and not showing at 100% zoom level

http://s7.postimg.org/oy0gq3x8b/chrome_firefox.png
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
left side is Chrome rendering; right side is Firefox
Notice the 3 images, all rendered zoomed in by Firefox.
No matter what I set in Preferences, what plugin I tried, i can't reset to 100% zoom.

Hello,
Firefox on Windows is now following display scaling options which may render text larger on high resolution displays.
You can adjust your screen resolution.
To modify it do the following:
* Type '''about:config''' into the Firefox address bar and tap on the Enter key.
* If the warning '''This might void your warranty''' appears, click '''I'll be careful, I promise'''.
* Search for '''layout.css.devPixelsPerPx'''
[[Image:Fx22layout.css.devPixelsPerPx]]
* Double-click on layout.css.devPixelsPerPx to modify its value. The default is -1.0 in Firefox 22 and above. Change it to '''1.0''' to make it work like in previous Firefox versions.
If necessary, further adjust the value in 0.1 or 0.05 steps. Use values between 1.0 and about 0.5 to reduce elements in size. Use values greater than 1.0 to increase size. For example, a value of 1.25 will increase font size to 125% to accommodate the default DPI setting in Windows 8. '''Double check the value that you enter.''' Setting a too small value will make everything disappear and a too large value will blow things up.
If web pages still need to be adjusted then you can look at the [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/default-fullzoom-level/ Default FullZoom Level] or [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/nosquint/ NoSquint] extension.
To adjust the font size for the user interface, you can use the [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/ Theme Font & Size Changer] extension.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
Thank you.

Restrict Access To Page Not Working with Different Auth Levels

I have just started playing with the idea of using different auth levels to allow different users access to certain pages on my site.
Within my SQL database I have a authlevel table consisting of 3 possible levels (guest, user, admin)
I am using the Dreamweaver "Log in user" to log in users based on username, pass, and auth level and "Restrict access to page" set to allow user levels 'user' and 'admin'.
The problem, however, occurs when trying to log in. No matter what auth level I try I am redirected to my page where users should be redirected if they are not allowed to enter that page.
I have included below my code from my login page and the page where all authorized users (user and admin) should be directed upon entering the restricted area.
Login Page:
<?php require_once('../Connections/hondovfd.php'); ?>
<?php
if (!function_exists("GetSQLValueString")) {
function GetSQLValueString($theValue, $theType, $theDefinedValue = "", $theNotDefinedValue = "")
if (PHP_VERSION < 6) {
    $theValue = get_magic_quotes_gpc() ? stripslashes($theValue) : $theValue;
$theValue = function_exists("mysql_real_escape_string") ? mysql_real_escape_string($theValue) : mysql_escape_string($theValue);
switch ($theType) {
    case "text":
      $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
      break;
    case "long":
    case "int":
      $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? intval($theValue) : "NULL";
      break;
    case "double":
      $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? doubleval($theValue) : "NULL";
      break;
    case "date":
      $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
      break;
    case "defined":
      $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? $theDefinedValue : $theNotDefinedValue;
      break;
return $theValue;
?>
<?php
// *** Validate request to login to this site.
if (!isset($_SESSION)) {
session_start();
$loginFormAction = $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'];
if (isset($_GET['accesscheck'])) {
$_SESSION['PrevUrl'] = $_GET['accesscheck'];
if (isset($_POST['username'])) {
$loginUsername=$_POST['username'];
$password=$_POST['password'];
$MM_fldUserAuthorization = "authlevel";
$MM_redirectLoginSuccess = "/membersonly/membersonly.php";
$MM_redirectLoginFailed = "/membersonly/loginfailed.php";
$MM_redirecttoReferrer = false;
mysql_select_db($database_hondovfd, $hondovfd);
$LoginRS__query=sprintf("SELECT username, password, authlevel FROM login WHERE username=%s AND password=%s",
GetSQLValueString($loginUsername, "text"), GetSQLValueString($password, "text"));
$LoginRS = mysql_query($LoginRS__query, $hondovfd) or die(mysql_error());
$loginFoundUser = mysql_num_rows($LoginRS);
if ($loginFoundUser) {
    $loginStrGroup = mysql_result($LoginRS,0,'authlevel');
    //declare two session variables and assign them
    $_SESSION['MM_Username'] = $loginUsername;
    $_SESSION['MM_UserGroup'] = $loginStrGroup;
    if (isset($_SESSION['PrevUrl']) && false) {
      $MM_redirectLoginSuccess = $_SESSION['PrevUrl'];
    header("Location: " . $MM_redirectLoginSuccess );
else {
    header("Location: ". $MM_redirectLoginFailed );
?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

<title>Log In</title>

<meta name="description" content="Hondo Fire and Rescue serves the Arroyo Hondo and Canada Village areas of Santa Fe County, NM." />
<meta name="keywords" content="hondo, hondo fire, hondo vfd, hondo fire department, santa fe county fire department, santa fe county, volunteer fire department, hondo volunteer fire department" />
<link href="../stylesheet.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />

<script src="../SpryAssets/SpryMenuBar.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link href="../SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarVertical.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body class="thrColLiqHdr">
<div id="container">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="sidebar1">
<h3>Navigation : </h3>
<ul id="MenuBar1" class="MenuBarVertical">
<li><a href="/index.php">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="/support.php">Support Hondo</a></li>
<li><a class="MenuBarItemSubmenu" href="#">Information Menu</a>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="/people.php">Our People</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=101620713606637979698.00045b6ead4ab4ea70b78&z=11" target="_blank">Response Area</a></li>
      <li><a href="/medical.php">Medical</a></li>
      <li><a href="/apparatus.php">Apparatus</a></li>
      <li><a href="/training.php">Training</a></li>
      <li><a href="/volunteer.php">Volunteer</a></li>
      <li><a href="/statistics.php">Statistics</a></li>
      <li><a href="/patchtrading.php">Patch Trading</a></li>
    </ul>
</li>
<li><a href="/album.php">Photo Gallery</a></li>
<li><a href="/calendar.php">Calendar</a></li>
<li><a href="/news.php">Blog/News</a></li>
<li><a href="/links.php">Links</a></li>
<li><a href="/contact.php">Contact Us</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post">
<span class="lefttext">
<input type="hidden" name="cmd" value="_s-xclick">
<input type="hidden" name="hosted_button_id" value="8567201">
<input type="image" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donate_LG.gif" border="0" name="submit" alt="PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!" />
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif" width="1" height="1">
</img></input></input>
</span>
</form>
<span class="lefttext"><br />
</span>
<center>
<span class="lefttext"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Santa-Fe-NM/Hondo-Volunteer-Fire-Department/74284233488" target="_blank" class="lefttext">Hondo VFD on Facebook</a></span>
</center>
</div>
<div id="sidebar2">
    <p><a href="/membersonly/login.php">Log In</a> | <a href="/membersonly/logout.php">Log Out</a></p>
    <p>Call Statistics for <?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/month.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?> as of <?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/date.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></p>
<table width="90%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td width="60%">EMS Calls</td>
    <td width="40%"><?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/emscalls.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td>Fire Calls</td>
    <td><?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/firecalls.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr />
    <div id="cse" style="width:100%;">Loading</div>
<script src="http://www.google.com/jsapi" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
google.load('search', '1');
google.setOnLoadCallback(function(){
    new google.search.CustomSearchControl().draw('cse');
}, true);
</script>
     
</div>

<div id="mainContent">
<div class="top"></div><div class="wrap">
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td height="47" class="h2">Members Only Login</td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td><form ACTION="<?php echo $loginFormAction; ?>" id="login" name="login" method="POST">
    <table width="40%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td width="31%">Username:</td>
    <td width="69%"><input name="username" type="text" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td>Password</td>
    <td><input name="password" type="password" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<input name="Submit" type="submit" />
    </form></td>
</tr>
</table>

</div>
<div class="bottom"></div>
</div>
      <br class="clearfloat" />
<div id="footer">
    <p align="center">© Copyright 2009 Hondo Volunteer Fire Department | <a href="mailto:[email protected]">Contact Us</a><a href="http://www.legalhelpers.com/chapter-13-bankruptcy/chapter13.html"></a><br />Hosting provided by <a href="http://studiox.com/" target="_blank">Studio X</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">

</script>
<?php include_once("/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/analyticstracking.php"); ?>
</body>
</html>
Other Page:
<?php
if (!isset($_SESSION)) {
session_start();
$MM_authorizedUsers = "user,admin";
$MM_donotCheckaccess = "false";
// *** Restrict Access To Page: Grant or deny access to this page
function isAuthorized($strUsers, $strGroups, $UserName, $UserGroup) {
// For security, start by assuming the visitor is NOT authorized.
$isValid = False;
// When a visitor has logged into this site, the Session variable MM_Username set equal to their username.
// Therefore, we know that a user is NOT logged in if that Session variable is blank.
if (!empty($UserName)) {
    // Besides being logged in, you may restrict access to only certain users based on an ID established when they login.
    // Parse the strings into arrays.
    $arrUsers = Explode(",", $strUsers);
    $arrGroups = Explode(",", $strGroups);
    if (in_array($UserName, $arrUsers)) {
      $isValid = true;
    // Or, you may restrict access to only certain users based on their username.
    if (in_array($UserGroup, $arrGroups)) {
      $isValid = true;
    if (($strUsers == "") && false) {
      $isValid = true;
return $isValid;
$MM_restrictGoTo = "/membersonly/loginfailed.php";
if (!((isset($_SESSION['MM_Username'])) && (isAuthorized("",$MM_authorizedUsers, $_SESSION['MM_Username'], $_SESSION['MM_UserGroup'])))) {
$MM_qsChar = "?";
$MM_referrer = $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'];
if (strpos($MM_restrictGoTo, "?")) $MM_qsChar = "&";
if (isset($QUERY_STRING) && strlen($QUERY_STRING) > 0)
$MM_referrer .= "?" . $QUERY_STRING;
$MM_restrictGoTo = $MM_restrictGoTo. $MM_qsChar . "accesscheck=" . urlencode($MM_referrer);
header("Location: ". $MM_restrictGoTo);
exit;
?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

<title>Members Only Area</title>

<meta name="description" content="Hondo Fire and Rescue serves the Arroyo Hondo and Canada Village areas of Santa Fe County, NM." />
<meta name="keywords" content="hondo, hondo fire, hondo vfd, hondo fire department, santa fe county fire department, santa fe county, volunteer fire department, hondo volunteer fire department" />
<link href="../stylesheet.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />

<script src="../SpryAssets/SpryMenuBar.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link href="../SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarVertical.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body class="thrColLiqHdr">
<div id="container">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="sidebar1">
<h3>Navigation : </h3>
<ul id="MenuBar1" class="MenuBarVertical">
<li><a href="/index.php">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="/support.php">Support Hondo</a></li>
<li><a class="MenuBarItemSubmenu" href="#">Information Menu</a>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="/people.php">Our People</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=101620713606637979698.00045b6ead4ab4ea70b78&z=11" target="_blank">Response Area</a></li>
      <li><a href="/medical.php">Medical</a></li>
      <li><a href="/apparatus.php">Apparatus</a></li>
      <li><a href="/training.php">Training</a></li>
      <li><a href="/volunteer.php">Volunteer</a></li>
      <li><a href="/statistics.php">Statistics</a></li>
      <li><a href="/patchtrading.php">Patch Trading</a></li>
    </ul>
</li>
<li><a href="/album.php">Photo Gallery</a></li>
<li><a href="/calendar.php">Calendar</a></li>
<li><a href="/news.php">Blog/News</a></li>
<li><a href="/links.php">Links</a></li>
<li><a href="/contact.php">Contact Us</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post">
<span class="lefttext">
<input type="hidden" name="cmd" value="_s-xclick">
<input type="hidden" name="hosted_button_id" value="8567201">
<input type="image" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donate_LG.gif" border="0" name="submit" alt="PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!" />
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif" width="1" height="1">
</img></input></input>
</span>
</form>
<span class="lefttext"><br />
</span>
<center>
<span class="lefttext"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Santa-Fe-NM/Hondo-Volunteer-Fire-Department/74284233488" target="_blank" class="lefttext">Hondo VFD on Facebook</a></span>
</center>
</div>
<div id="sidebar2">
    <p><a href="/membersonly/login.php">Log In</a> | <a href="/membersonly/logout.php">Log Out</a></p>
    <p>Call Statistics for <?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/month.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?> as of <?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/date.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></p>
<table width="90%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td width="60%">EMS Calls</td>
    <td width="40%"><?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/emscalls.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td>Fire Calls</td>
    <td><?php
$myFile = "/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/membersonly/firecalls.txt";
$fh = fopen($myFile, 'r');
$theData = fread($fh, filesize($myFile));
fclose($fh);
echo $theData;
?></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr />
    <div id="cse" style="width:100%;">Loading</div>
<script src="http://www.google.com/jsapi" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
google.load('search', '1');
google.setOnLoadCallback(function(){
    new google.search.CustomSearchControl().draw('cse');
}, true);
</script>
     
</div>

<div id="mainContent">
<div class="top"></div><div class="wrap">
    <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <td height="47" class="h2">Members Only Area</td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td><p><a href="/membersonly/documents.php">Useful Documents</a></p>
      <p><a href="/membersonly/IncidentCount01_08.pdf">Current Call Statistics</a> as of 9/3/09</p>
      </td>
</tr>
</table>
<script type="text/javascript">

</script>
</div>
<div class="bottom"></div>
</div>
      <br class="clearfloat" />
<div id="footer">
    <p align="center">© Copyright 2009 Hondo Volunteer Fire Department | <a href="mailto:[email protected]">Contact Us</a><a href="http://www.legalhelpers.com/chapter-13-bankruptcy/chapter13.html"></a><br />Hosting provided by <a href="http://studiox.com/" target="_blank">Studio X</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">

</script>
<?php include_once("/var/home/hondovfd/hondovfd.org/www/analyticstracking.php"); ?>
</body>
</html>

you don't need all that bloat. set a session during login of some kind of uniquely identifying id. i.e.
$_SESSION['id'] = $row_rs['id'];
then on the pages you need to protect, check it like this....
<?php
session_start();
if (!(isset($_SESSION['id']) && $_SESSION['id'] != '')) {
die(header("Location: http://www.notinprotectedareas.com")); }
?>
you can use an include file i.e.
<?php require_once('login_check.php'); ?>
where file is name login_check.php to make your auth controls clean on your protected pages.

Auto resolution not adapting to zoom level

As the title states, the resolution does not adapt to the zoom level dispite having Auto selected.
I also checked in the advanced composition options and preserve resolution when nested is selected.
This issue happens in every comp and different project files.
I'm running CS5 on Mac OS X 10.6.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Auto Resolution doesn't do what you apparently think it does. Here's a quote taken from AE's Online Help about Auto Resolution:
"Adapts the resolution of the view in the Composition panel to render only the pixels necessary to preview the composition at the current zoom level. For example, if the view is zoomed out to 25%, then the resolution automatically adapts to a value of 1/4—shown as (Quarter)—as if you had manually chosen Quarter. If a panel contains multiple views, the resolution adapts to the view with the highest zoom level. This setting gives the best image quality while also avoiding rendering pixels unnecessary for the current zoom level."
Thus, if you look at your AE comp at something like 800%, you will see the pixels. You're simply looking at the comp as you would with a magnifying glass.
If you are scaling up a layer beyond 100% or if you're animating a camera to see only a very small section of a layer, AE will not automatically add resolution to the layer to make it nice and sharp. It can't. The only exception is when you use text layers, or use vector graphics with the Continuously Rasterize switch turned on.

Gray scale photos images are different but should be the same; help?

I send a gray scale image from Lightroom (Edit with ...) and it opened CS4 photoshop.
I made a blank document , 11x14".
I used Windows/arrange/ tile to view the blank and the gray scale image. I tired various methods of bringing the gray scale image to the blank one (move tool, select all and move, copy and paste). Each time, I did this within seconds of each other (I made no changes to fill, opacity, and I used Normal). I brought the image in twice so I could print out the SAME image twice on the larger 11x14 at Sams club in order to use the Epson 7800 printer and not the old wet process on the Fugi machine. One image is darker(lighter) than the other every time. I even tried another image and I got two different exposures.
I wonder if it it only happens with the grayscale images? Perhaps it is a problem coming from Lightroom 2.5?
I did a three image 16x20 and I didn't notice the difference - partly because they were three differenct images in color. I will try two color images from the same file tomorrow.
Any thoughts? I haven't found a possible setting problem that would have been applied between the operations.
Rich

Paulo,
Thanks. I was ready to believe the monitor idea but I still have some reservations.
I don't doubt what you said about the pixels (sounds correct to me).
Why?
I tried another monitor and the images I attached also look like the top one is darker (vertically).
Also, the same is true if I scrolled the images. It seems to me that I should see a difference as I slowly scroll the image vertically. I didn't see a difference.
Read on please.
At any rate (I long for a CRT - my 21" crapped out last year), I am using two SAMSUNG screens, the
one attached to the main computer is the Syncmaster T220 - a well rated
monitor; as far as I knew , read and had friends who recommended them.
The other I just tried is attached to the second computer a couple of feet away. It is the syncMaster T240HD.
So, if it is an LCD monitor problem, it is with both and the same
company. I would think I would have read some bad reports about these
LCDs?
Also, wouldn't the color images also be different when presented the same way? (they aren't).
However, I went back to the original T220 LCD display and moved an image in to a blank one as before, then did the control J to copy the layer, and the images we different again. But, I zoomed in more than usual and scrolled the images and they were lighter at the bottom of the screen and darker at the top of the screen!!!!!!
That is good news and bad news! $$$$$$
If it is the monitor problem, then both images should print as the same.????
Secondly, the display (LCD) attached to the machine at Sams showed the same difference between the two images. AND, I recall that the display is also a Samsung (I will check that tomorrow).
What a bunch of coincidences! I guess I have to search the web for some Samsung answers? and contact the company?
I want to explore as much on my end as possible.
Hunt and another suggested the Control-J to avoid the problem by copying the layer. That didn't work either.
I suppose I could tweak one of the images after bringing them in but I don't know how (I clicked the layer and I wasn't able to do anything - like lighten that image).
Again, thanks for the help. I think the question maybe answered.
I will send the screen capture shortly.
Rich

How can I make a permanent change in the zoom level?

I want to know how I can make a permanent change is the zoom level? I dont want to constantly have to change it from the default value of 100% every time I go to a different page. Thanks.

Hello,
You can also use the [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2592/ NoSquint] add-on to change the default zoom level for all websites at once. After setting your global zoom level, you can fine-tune the zoom on individual sites and set the options so that NoSquint remembers per-site settings.
After installing NoSquint, go to the add-ons page to set the per-site settings:
* Tools (or [[Image: New Fx Menu]]) > Add-ons > Extensions
* Click the "Options" button by NoSquint

Cropping to View or Cropping to Zoom Level

Just wondering if this is already an option and I just can't find it... I work with very large images, and having a television background, I am always looking for the Wide/Medium/Tight shots - for example, getting three different shots from the originals. When I am zooming in to make corrections or retouch, I find myself saying "Now THAT would make a GREAT image cropped exactly where it is". Instead of dragging out the Crop Tool and risk the image "moving" from the exact zoom level or view I have it at, is there a way to "CROP TO VIEW" or "CROP TO ZOOM LEVEL" with just one click that I am missing, or should this go to the Photoship Wish List? Thanks, all!

As far as I can tell that’s currently not possible, so unless someone else has more insight here you might want to post in the Feature Request Forum.
While the zoom-level is accessible for Scripting purposes the image’s position in the window is not (to the best of my knowledge).

Pixelated images in different zoom levels

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for