PL/SQL Object Type - Java oracle.jbo.domain

Question

PL/SQL Object Type <-> Java oracle.jbo.domain
can anybody help me, getting my domains to work?
Following scenario:
in pl/sql we have an object type called MULTI_LANGUAGE. This type is used for storing multilingual texts as nested table in one(!) column.
So the object MULTI_LANGUAGE contains a member variable LANGUAGE_COLLECTION of type LANGUAGE_TABLE, which itself is a nested table of objects
of the type LANGUAGE_FIELD (this again is only a language id and the corresponding content)
Also the methods setContent(langID, langContent) and getContent(langId) are defined on Object MULTI_LANGUAGE.
For example: Table having primary key, 2 other columns and one column of object type MULTI_LANGAGE (=nested table of objects)
|ID|Column1|Column2|  multilingual Column  |
|--|---------------------------------------|
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|  |       |       | | 1 | hello         | |
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|1 | foo   | bar   | | 2 | hallo         | |   <- Row Nr 1
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|  |       |       | | 3 | ola           | |
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|--|-------|-------|-----------------------|
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|  |       |       | | 1 | world         | |
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|2 | abc   | def   | | 2 | welt          | |   <- Row Nr 2
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|  |       |       | | 3 | ???  ;-)      | |
|  |       |       |  -------------------  |
|--|-------|-------|-----------------------|Now i've tried to modell this structure as an oracle.jbo.domain.
class MultiLanguage extends Struct having this StructureDef:
attrs[(0)] = new DomainAttributeDef("LanguageColl", "LANGUAGE_COLL", 0, oracle.jbo.domain.Array.class, 2003, "ARRAY", -127, 0, false, "campusonlinepkg.common.LanguageField");
and
class LanguageField extends Struct having this StructureDef:
attrs[(0)] = new DomainAttributeDef("Id", "ID", 0, oracle.jbo.domain.Number.class, 2, "NUMERIC", -127, 0, false);
attrs[(1)] = new DomainAttributeDef("Content", "CONTENT", 1, java.lang.String.class, 12, "VARCHAR", -127, 4000, false);
Is there anything wrong with this StructureDef?
When running the BC-Browser with -Djbo.debugoutput=console -Djbo.jdbc.driver.verbose=true parameters I get suspect warnings when browsing the records
[196] Executing FAULT-IN...SELECT NR, NAME FROM B_THESAURI BThesauri WHERE NR=:1
[197] SQLException: SQLState(null) vendor code(17074)
[198] java.sql.SQLException: Ungültiges Namensmuster: XMLTEST.null
...snip: detail of stack...
[240] SQLException: SQLState(null) vendor code(17060)
[241] java.sql.SQLException: Deskriptor konnte nicht erstellt werden: Unable to resolve type "null"
...snip: detail of stack...
[280] Warning:No element type set on this array. Assuming java.lang.Object.
(XMLTEST is the name of the schema)
Seems as if the framework can't read the TypeDescriptor or does not know which descriptor to read (XMLTEST.null??)
Do I have to implement my own JboTypeMap?
Please help, I'm stuck.
Thanks in advance, Christian

Answer 1

Thanks for your suggestion, but it seems to me as if there is one level missing.
in pl/sql I have following structure:
Struct MULTI_LANGUAGE (Object type) - outermost
  Array LANGUAGE_TABLE (nested table type)
    Struct LANGUAGE_FIELD (Object type simple) - innermostthe reason why i had to wrap another struct around the array was because it is not possible to define methods on a nested table. this is only possible on objects.
on the outermost object type (which holds the array of language fields) I needed to define following 2 methods for direct access:
getContent (langId in number) returns varchar2
setContent (langId in number, langContent in varchar2)
I would like to rebuild the same structure in java, because newly written java code should live in perfect harmony with legacy pl/sql code ;-)
Both applications (Java and pl/sql) have to access the same data as long as migration to java goes on.
Is this nested structure too much for a Domain?
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again, Christian