Placing Rac db redologs members on san disks ASM and local scasi disks

Hi
Kindly advice if should I face a performance problem case I placed db redologs members one on ASM and the 2nd on Local server scasi disk.
Thanks

As long as you would have the local disk not being into contention due to any other files being present or just being slow, you should be fine. But make sure that you do have the local disk in such a way that it's visible to the other node as well because that would be required in the case of recovery.
HTH
Aman....

Similar Messages

Slow. iMac 10.5.8. Verified Disk Permissions and then Repaired Disk Permissions. Not much improvement in speed. How do I empty internet files from safari?

iMac 10.5.8 is slow. Verified Disk Permissions and then repaired. No big improvement in speed.
What about internet files (safari and firefox) ; caches and cookies?
Thank you.

Applejack might help.
Download:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/applejack/
Article on using:
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-10334620-263.html?tag=mfiredir
It runs in single user mode, where it runs more safely than other maintenance/cleaning programs because there is less chance of interference from the OS. After installing (you won't see it in the Applications Folder) hold CMD-S at startup. You will get a black screen with MS-DOS like text. Just follow the prompts: type in "applejack AUTO" and it will run through the following:
Correct any Disk problems.
Repair Permissions.
Clear out Cache Files.
Repair/check several plist files.
Dump the VM files for a fresh start.
Trash old Log files.
You can also run tasks selectively and for specific users by typing in "applejack." After running in "AUTO," you can go back and run it again as "applejack," steps 3 & 4 only, for your user.
The first reboot will take much longer than usual, as it rebuilds caches. It may take several restarts to see the benefits. Because of the deep cache cleaning in AUTO mode some applications may tell you they are being opened for the first time.
NOT YET UPDATED FOR LION
(Adapted from post by BDAqua)

MBA won't reboot from remote disk to reach Disk Utility and repair the disk

After a routine disk repair session, it advised me that I need to repair the disk on my MBA. A few months ago it was the same, and I did it quite successfully without any problems, according to instructions: inserted the MacOS 10.6 DVD into the iMac optical drive, launched Remote Install OS, and so on. However, now my MacBook Air refuses to boot from the remote disk, so that I can reach the Disk Utility and proceed to repair disk. It sees the remote DVD Installer disk, I connect to my home WiFi, and I choose reboot from the Install DVD disk. An Apple logo appears on a grey screen with a small globe spinning below, but after a some lengthy minutes it always reboots normally!!! It seems I tried everything many times to no avail.
Any solutions???

Nope. Waiting for 10.6.4 update, which is hopefully next week and may change the situation for better.

Can The ASM Disk Header and Disk Group Be Renamed?

I have a requirement to mount multiple SAN clones (EMC Symclone) of a production ASM instance on the same development server. RMAN is too slow to be an option, unless I find a white paper explaining any way to make RMAN perform a clone faster than the SAN.
The default response is normally, "Do your clone to dedicated hardware." However, that answer is not an option for obvious financial reasons, especially since I am working with a RAC environment with ~10 development and test environments.
The only way to do this (that I can think of) is to rename the disk header and probably the disk group prior to making it available to the ASM instance.
I have heard that Oracle has come up with an undocumented solution for one or more businesses. I believe it has something to do with the kfed library located in $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/lib.
Has anyone out there managed to do this? If so, can you share your solution or point me in the right direction?
I know I am not the only one out there looking for a solution to this issue...
Thanks in advance.

This is absolutely possible. Can be done via kfed. I never found the answer searching the net and had to figure it out. Here it is in hopes that it helps someone else. DISCLAIMER.... If you screw up your disks don't blame me. If you have any questions about this you can email me: [email protected]
The procedure is basically this:
- compile kfed
- dump the disk header with kfed
- Modify the dump file
- write the dump back to the disk header.
** Changing ANYTHING other than the diskgroup name will render your disks useless.
Here is a script to do the work for you:
for file in `ls /dev/vx/rdsk/as1_pccdw/asmdata*`
do
echo "Processing DATA disk $file ..."
search=ASCDW_DATA
replace=AS1CDW_DATA
newlength=`echo $replace | wc -m`
let newlength=$newlength-1
shortname=`echo $file | cut -f 6 -d /`
kfed op=read dev=$file | sed -e '24,24s/ '$search' / '$replace' /' -e '24,24s/length=.*/length='$newlength'/' > /tmp/$shortname.kfed
kfed op=write dev=$file text=/tmp/$shortname.kfed CHKSUM=YES
done
for file in `ls /dev/vx/rdsk/as1_pccdw/asmredo*`
do
echo "Processing REDO disk $file ..."
search=ASCDW_REDO
replace=AS1CDW_REDO
newlength=`echo $replace | wc -m`
let newlength=$newlength-1
shortname=`echo $file | cut -f 6 -d /`
kfed op=read dev=$file | sed -e '24,24s/ '$search' / '$replace' /' -e '24,24s/length=.*/length='$newlength'/' > /tmp/$shortname.kfed
kfed op=write dev=$file text=/tmp/$shortname.kfed CHKSUM=YES
done
Edited by: user4630111 on Nov 10, 2008 6:03 PM

RMAN Backup to ASM and DISK Multiple Locations

Hi
We currently have a RAC database that backs up to the Flash Recovery Area on ASM.
Is there any way of backing up to ASM and Local Disk at the same time? I know you can configure multiple locations but what is the syntax to backup to ASM?
I've seen the line
format '/disk1/......','/disk2/.....' etc which backs upto multiple locations.
Is ASM just '+data/......' ?
Thanks

as you said, use the ASM path in the format scope.
also if you want to backup the DBF's as is(not a backup set) - use:
backup as copy database;
good luck

Macbook Pro not booting after update. ''Disk Utility can't repair disk''. Help needed!

I have recently updated my macbook pro as I had some pending software updates. I left it to do the job over night and the next day I noticed it was not letting me sign in to my account session as usual.
I restarted the computer and ever since then when I boot it, it just shows the apple grey screen with a bar that loads to about a 3rd and then it turns off again. I have contacted apple but they were unable to help me with this.
So far I have tried to:
1. Re-install OS X 10.8 - but it says the disk is locked or OS X cannot be installed on Recovery HD.
2. Verify and Repair the disk and I errors but it cannot fix them. Some are:
               'invalid leaf count''
               ''missing thread record''
               ''incorrect number of file hard links''
               ''overlapped extent allocation''
          and it finally says ''the volume Macintosh HD cannot be repaired'' Error: ''Disk Utility can't repair this disk.. disk, and restore your backed up files.
I would like to know a way to back up my files so that i can completely restore the disk without any data loss as I havent backed up for a while!
If anyone has any solution to this issue it would be much appreciated!

I just ran the Disk Utility, and cannot very disk. It gives me an error message;
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit
1 HFS volume checked
Volume needs repair
and when I run the repair, this is the message:
The volume GERRARD could not be repaired.
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit
1 HFS volume checked
1 volume could not be repaired because of an error
Repair attempted on 1 volume
1 volume could not be repaired
Prior to running Disk Utility, I have already tried DiskWarrior, and could not repair my disk. Anyway I can fix this problem??? Formatting the disk would be my last option (though I am unsure if it will fix the problem). Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Meanwhile, I will continue to back up my file, and delete unused data and try to run it again.
Thank you all very much for any input.
Cheers,
Matt

Disk Utility - Can't repair Disk - Help needed :(

Hi,
I have some trouble to use Disk Utility (on my iBook G4 - 1.33 Ghz+1 GB RAM)
I run Disk Utility to verify and repair permissions, which worked, and then Verify Disk. HEre is the logged result:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aug 26 09:32:58: Disk Utility started.
Verify permissions for “E=G4”
Determining correct file permissions.
Permissions verification complete
The privileges have been verified or repaired on the selected volume
Verifying volume “E=G4”
Checking HFS Plus volume.
Checking Extents Overflow file.
Checking Catalog file.
Checking multi-linked files.
Checking Catalog hierarchy.
Checking Extended Attributes file.
Checking volume bitmap.
Volume Bit Map needs minor repair
Checking volume information.
Invalid volume free block count
Invalid volume free block count
uld be %@ instead of %@)",2)
4078185
4078184
Volume Header needs minor repair
The volume E=G4 needs to be repaired.
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit
Disk Utility stopped verifying “E=G4” because the following error was encountered:
The underlying task reported failure on exit
1 HFS volume checked
Volume needs repair
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I wanted to run Disk Repair, but the button would not highlight, therefore could not be started.
I retried today, and now the Verify Disk task won't even work, blocking Disk Utility (needs force quit)
(E=G4 is the name of my Hard Drive on the iBook)
I also tried TechTool Deluxe coming with Applecare protection plan, but TTD can not check the "Volume Structure".
Has anyone got any tips or sequence to solve this?
Thanks in advance
Yann
Message was edited by: ObiYann

I just ran the Disk Utility, and cannot very disk. It gives me an error message;
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit
1 HFS volume checked
Volume needs repair
and when I run the repair, this is the message:
The volume GERRARD could not be repaired.
Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit
1 HFS volume checked
1 volume could not be repaired because of an error
Repair attempted on 1 volume
1 volume could not be repaired
Prior to running Disk Utility, I have already tried DiskWarrior, and could not repair my disk. Anyway I can fix this problem??? Formatting the disk would be my last option (though I am unsure if it will fix the problem). Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Meanwhile, I will continue to back up my file, and delete unused data and try to run it again.
Thank you all very much for any input.
Cheers,
Matt

Disk utility disabled the verify disk button

Hi.
Up to 5 minutes ago, I was able to run the disk utility and verify my disk. Now, only the permission-related buttons are enabled.
Does anyone know why this happened? Why can't I verify my disk anymore?
Thanks a lot.
mircea

I understand that, but then it's strange that I could verify from the boot disk before. As I said, it's the first time I can't do this, and that's what putting me off. In the past 6 months I would verify and repair my disk while booted from it. My question is how come, suddenly, I can't do this anymore?
Would this be something an update could have addressed? It did seem to happen after I installed the latest security update and the superdrive update. What do you think?
Thanks for answering,
Mircea

Problem with Disk Utility and with ITunes and with Classic

Greetings. I have had problems with ITunes recently; when I try to open it, it gives me the error message: "The ITunes Music Library file is locked, on a locked disk, or you do not have write permission for this file."
When I looked at the ITunes discussion section, people had two ideas for other people who had the same problem:
(1) Make sure that the library of music files is write-enabled (which it is) and not locked (it isn't) and
(2) Go to Disk Utility and repair the disk.
Since (1) is not a problem, I am trying (2). However, when I open Disk Utility, it just stays on the window, stating "Gathering disk information..." and proceeds no further.
Perhaps related to these problems, when I try to start up Classic, the window opens, but it gets stuck at the very beginning (stating "Classic starting up using System Folder ...") and proceeds no further.
Can anyone help me with these multiple problems? Thanks in advance.

amandel
The problems you report are different than those relating to the iTunes receipts/DU conflict. Trashing those receipts as suggested is necessary to get DU to repair permissions, but, as I understand it, you couldn't get DU to recognise your drives. And I've seen no posts relating to iTunes 6 and Classic.
I've had the problem you describe before (at least vis-a-vis DU). In principle DU's "Repair Disk" function would fix it, but of course if the disk's don't mount in DU then you can't fix them:)
Therefore fsck is a good solution, or trying DU from the Installer Disk (don't start to install, just let the first installer window appear, go to the menu and choose "Open Disk Utility") and repairing. Then reboot and repair permissions, preferably with DU running from your hard drive.
Maybe you're more of a "don't touch what's still running" kind of person, but it sounds to me like the systems a bit wobbly and needs some tender loving care. You could try a clean up using a program like OnyX as well - it won't do any harm.
Robert
G4 PB Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Verify Disk - gray and not selectable

Recently, Disk First Aid reported a problem with my startup drive that it could not repair.
So I shifted to Disk Warrior. It found a number of problems and claimed it could fix them. I said okay.
I restarted from an Install DVD, ran Disk Utility, and ran Repair Disk from First Aid. It gave the startup drive a clean bill of health. Yeah!
But here's the odd thing: After booting from the startup drive again, I went to First Aid again. And now the Verify Disk option for the startup drive was grayed out and not selectable. The "Live Verification" features was not working. Verify Disk was selectable for all other volumes of course.
This makes me concerned that there is still something weird with the drive.
Anyway, does anyone know why the Live Verification feature is not enabled here? And what to do about it?

You might check to see if Journaling is enabled after having run DiskWarrior. It's been my experience that using DiskWarrior breaks Journaling.
Open Disk Utility and highlight the startup disk. Select Enable Journaling from the File menu (or press Command + J). Once enabled, the Verify Disk button should become available again.
Good luck!
Andrew99

RAC with ASM and shared disks?

Hi all,
Can someone clarify this little point please. If I use ASM as my storage with a RAC database, I have to configure these nodes to shared disks. At least this is what the UG says ...
When you create a disk group for a cluster or add new disks to an existing clustered disk group, you only need to prepare the underlying physical storage on shared disks. The shared disk requirement is the only substantial difference between using ASM in a RAC database compared to using it in a single-instance Oracle database. ASM automatically re-balances the storage load after you add or delete a disk or disk group.
With my 9i databases, I used HCAMP to allow for concurrent VG access among the nodes. My questions are ...
1) How can I share this storage as stated above without using HACMP? My understanding is with 10g I no longer have to use it.
2) Can Oracle's clusterware be used to share storage? I have not seen any indication that it does.
3) Does this mean I still have to use HCAMP with 10g crs to allow shared storage?
Thank you

"...meaning visible to all the participating nodes, which you don't need HACMP..."
This is one step forward, but still not clear. On unix, storage is presented to ASM as raw volumes. As such, how can these volumes be visible on all nodes without using HCAMP (or whatever 3rd party clusterware you are using). Presenting raw volumes on several nodes is something that is not done at OS level without using some clusterware functionality.
I do understand that storage or LUNs can be shared at the SAN fabric level. But then, these LUNs are carved in bug chunks and I would like to be able to allocate storage at much granular level using raw partitions.
So all in all, here are my questions ...
1) On unix platforms, can ASM disks be LUNs, raw volumes, or may be both?
2) If raw volumes, how are these shared (or made visible) without using 3rd party clusterware? Having managed 9i RAC, it was the function of HACMP to make these volumes visible on all nodes, otherwise, we had to imp/exp VGs on all nodes to make them visible.
Thank you

What is best practice for using a SAN with ASM in an 11gR2 RAC installation

I'm setting up a RAC environment. Planning on using Oracle 11g release 2 for RAC & ASM, although the db will initially be 10g r2. OS: RedHat. I have a SAN available to me and want to know the best way to utilise that via ASM.
I've chosen ASM as it allows me to store everything, including the voting and cluster registry files.
So I think I'll need three disk groups: Data (+spfile, control#1, redo#1, cluster files#1), Flashback (+control#2, redo#2, archived redo, backups, cluster files#2) and Cluster - Cluster files#3. So that last one in tiny.
The SAN and ASM are both capable of doing lots of the same work, and it's a waste to get them both to stripe & mirror.
If I let the SAN do the redundancy work, then I can minimize the data transfer to the SAN. The administrative load of managing the discs is up to the Sys Admin, rather than the DBA, so that's attractive as well.
If I let ASM do the work, it can be intelligent about the data redundacy it uses.
It looks like I should have LUN (Logical Unit Numbers) with RAID 0+1. And then mark the disk groups as extrenal redundancy.
Does this seem the best option ?
Can I avoid this third disk group just for the voting and cluster registry files ?
Am I OK to have this lower version of Oracle 10gr2 DB on a RAC 11gr2 and ASM 11gr2 ?
TIA, Duncan

Hi Duncan,
if your storage uses SAN RAID 0+1 and you use "External" redundancy, then ASM will not mirror (only stripe).
Hence theoretically 1 LUN per diskgroup would be enough. (External redundancy will also only create 1 voting disk, hence only one LUN is needed).
However there are 2 things to note:
-> Tests have shown that for the OS it is better to have multiple LUNs, since the I/O can be better handled. Therefore it is recommended to have 4 disks in a diskgroup.
-> LUNs in a diskgroup should be the same size and should have same I/O characteristica. If you now have in mind, that maybe your database one time will need more space (more disks) than you should use a disk size, which can easily be added, without waisting too much space.
E.g:
If you have a 900GB database then does it make sense to only use 1 lun with 1TB?
What happens if the database grows, but only grows slightly above 1TB? Then you should add another disk with 1TB.... You loose a lot of space.
Hence it does make more sence to use 4 disks á 250GB, since the "disks" needed to grow the disk groups can be extended more easily. (just add another 250G disk).
O.k. there is also the possibility to resize a disk in ASM, but it is a lot easier to simple add an additional lun.
PS: If you use a "NORMAL" redundancy diskgroup, then you need at least 3 disks in your diskgroup (in 3 failgroups) to be able to handle the 3 voting disks.
Hope that helps a little.
Sebastian

Servers with local disk space and SAN disk: is it possible?

Hello,
I am evaluating Oracle VM. We have some servers with local 15000rpm hdds. We also would like to use a SAN. Is it possible to have some domu in local hard disks and some in SAN?
Can I enable HA for domu in SAN?
Thanks in advance for any reply!
Mario Giammarco

I am evaluating Oracle VM. We have some servers with local 15000rpm hdds. We also would like to use a SAN. Is it >possible to have some domu in local hard disks and some in SAN?you can have some domu in local and some in SAN. But domu from local cannot be migrated to other server. In case of SAN you can migrate to other servers.
Can I enable HA for domu in SAN?Yes.

Installing oracle 11.2 rac with IBM Storwize V7000 san with aix 6.1

Has and one deployed 11g rac with IBM Storwize V7000 san with aix 6.1
Is this possible using Oracle CRS without going for OS cluster like GPFS

Hi lbn76,
Has and one deployed 11g rac with IBM Storwize V7000 san with aix 6.1
Is this possible using Oracle CRS without going for OS cluster like GPFS
I hope same thing will work with AIX 6.1 alsoNo problem, the procedure of installation of clusterware is the same in any AIX Platform.
If you are using Clusterware 11.2 you can (should) use ASM Diskgroup to place your clusterware files and database files. If you want use Cluster Filesystem to any other purpose you can use ACFS feature of ASM.
The Storage will be transparent to the ASM, the Luns will be mapped to AIX and ASM (Oracle) will manage the read and write.
The Storage Storwize have several great features, but are transparent to the ASM. The ASM will only see the LUNs provided by AIX.
Regards,
Levi Pereira

RAC and ASM with geographically seperated disks

We are planning to use RAC and ASM with four nodes. The two nodes will be at one location and another two nodes at different location. The ASM disks also will be available locally. Is it possible to configure ASM with geographycally serepared disks.
We are thinking of two RAC and ASM setups with two nodes each and streams replication between the RACs.
I want to know what is the best method to implement. Is it RAC with four nodes OR two RACs with two nodes each and streams replication between the RACs.

Apart from the latency issue, which has been mentioned by others, you also need to mirror your disks between the two sites and be very careful about split brain scenarios under node or site crashes.
You need to mirror the disks between the sites in case one site crashes completely and loses all network access. The only way the second site can carry on is if it has access to all the data disks, and the cluster control disks (terms vary for this, such as quorum or voting disk). If you do not mirror you simply do not have a resilient design. Resilience is about eliminating all single points of failures, which means duplicating everything i.e. mirroring.
And mirroring between two remote sites adds more volume to the data traffic between the two sites. And it would need to be synchronous rather than asynchronous to guarantee no data loss. And your commits for each transaction would be limited by the round trip time to write to the remote site and get the acknowledgement back.
Split brain is something you need to avoid with remote clusters, and local clusters too. If the network goes down between the two sites and both sites have local copies of all of the data and cluster control disks, which site becomes the primary and which one becomes the standby? You cannot have both sites coming back up as primary with active databases and accepting transactions! At this point you have split brain, and each side is processing transactions independently, and both databases are now deviating from each other with different data changes.
I don't think a 4 node RAC environment split across geographical distances is really viable, except under small transaction volumes, and where response time (transaction time) is not critical. If you have high volumes and need fast transactions then you need to only use local RAC configurations, and replicate between the two sites asynchronously. DataGuard is easier, but you need to decide if you need Streams and how to make it work for you.
John

Placing Rac db redologs members on san disks ASM and local scasi disks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for