Plan Driven Procurement - Error message "Structure 01 CP 10170237 CP-S-O

Hi SRM Experts,
Iam seeking your help to avoid error messages in the Plan driven procurement scenario.
I have configured Plan driven procurement scenario as described in the ref. material. The objective of this scenario is transferred PR in EB/SRM should create a entry in sourcing cockpit.
Back end (R/3)configuration steps completed:
1. Entries maintained in V_T160EX, V_T160PR
2. RFC communication established using RFC user
3. As soon as PR (Purchase Requisition) is created from Projects, Network the PR is available in EPRTANS table with Procurement profile.
4. Manually executed PR Transfer program BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER
5. Outbound Queue got generated but with below error message.
Error Message: Structure 01 CP 10170237 CP-S-O: No agent found
SRM/EBP Settings maintained:
Direct procurement attribute maintained.
Entry channel created under Company code org. structure
RFC user is assigned to the entry channel.
Assigned Product categories and entries channel to the respective purchase group.
Defined sourcing for product categories.
After maintaining all above configuration, iam still getting error message.
Please provide your expert guidence to complete this scenario setup.
Regards,
Karnati

Hi Nagi,
This is related to Parner determination process with both systems in CRM & ECC.
Error Details: "Partner Function" in CRM is not there in ECC.
We mapped in ECC by creating a ZB copied from "SB" Partner function in ECC & reprocessed the order in CRM, Henceforth rectififed the error.
Many Thanks !!!
Sany.

Similar Messages

Plan driven procurement error

hai ,
i have configured plan driven procurement.i maintained tables v_t160pr,v_t160ex and run a report bbp_extreq_transfer.and later i have checked in smq1 where i find a sytem error like
exception condition " partner_not_employee " raised
can anyone please give the solution
thanks and regards
chakradhar

hai jagadish,
thank you very much for ur valuable solution.finally i got it .but i got one error.i had found that particular sc in bbp_pd transaction.but i wanted to see it in purchasers worklist.what are all the attributes i have to assign in the organisation for the particular user to get the sc.
thanks and regards
n.chakradhar

ERROR in Invoice posting from XI to SRM in MM-SUS plan driven procurement

Hi
We are implementing MM-SUS plan driven procurement scenario. MM version is 4.7. we are using Z-Program to trigger Invoice i-doc from MM to XI. its reaching XI but from XI to SRM there is some error.
the error is DYNAMIC_CALL_FAILURE
Function call failed; could not find the function BBP_PD_SUSIV_GETLIST Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1U20; Line: 63
any help is appericiated.
Thanks,
Arvind

Hi Arvind,
From Xi to SRM, by the looks of it, you are calling a BAPI. Can you specify how is your scenario configured ?
If it is a BAPI, can you also try to test it(on the SRM box itself) from the Function Module test tool?
Pls let us know the results/details.
cheers
danus

Direct procurement & plan driven procurement

Hello experts,
i have the following basic questions -
1- is the local PO in extended classic scenario contain Purchase org info? how the Purchase Org is determined ?
2- is Direct material procuremnt can only be used in case of Extended classic scenario?
3 - is Local Purchase group is mandatory for plan-driven procurement ? can i assign the entry channel to a Purchase group which is linked to R/3 Purchase grp ?
Thanks in advance

> Hello experts,
>
> i have the following basic questions -
>
> 1- is the local PO in extended classic scenario
> contain Purchase org info? how the Purchase Org is
> determined ?
>
> 2- is Direct material procuremnt can only be used in
> case of Extended classic scenario?
>
> 3 - is Local Purchase group is mandatory for
> plan-driven procurement ? can i assign the entry
> channel to a Purchase group which is linked to R/3
> Purchase grp ?
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Hi,
for 2) direct material works like an ext. classic scenario. However it is not exactly the same since ECS could have accounting assignment where direct material excluded that.
for 3) Local purchasing grp is mandatory for direct material and ECS scenario. Other than that, it is not required. The user can exists anywhere in the org structure as long as a responsible P.Org and Grp have been assigned for that user.
Regards.

SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement?

Hello experts, I want to know if the combination of SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement is possible? or if there any limitation to consider? Our client needs to create purchase requisition in ERP -> send this purchase requisitions to SRM (as shopping carts) create bids - > quotations - > create contract from accepted quotations and then from the contract we need to create purchase order but this one must be created in ERP (classic scenario) Someone has experimented the same situation? Best regards and thanks for your Help.
Liam

Hi Lima ,
Classic scenario wont support PPS .
        - Stand alone and classic scenario not supported
        - Shopping cart renamed to Purchase Requisition
        - Shopping cart generate (pre)commitment in funds management
        - Contract can create Funds Reservation (Earmarked Funds) in Funds Management as a Guarantee
        - Goods Receipt and Invoice created in ERP
        - Mixed PO: PO with lines that works like contract lines, a PO can be created from these lines
        - PO created from contracts or mixed-PO is named call-off PO. Only is a new name, is a "normal" SRM      PO
        - Goods receipt possible in SRM only in "easy" cases
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

I canu00B4t see de PR in the EPRTRANS Table in the scenario Plan Driven Procur

Hi,
We want to transfer PR from R/3 to SRM. We have customize the Plan driven Procurement, but we can´t see them in the EPRTRANS table. The Release Strategy has been completed in the PR.
Releases:
R/3 6.0, SRM 5.5
Any help please?

Hi John,
The second option works in SRM.
Direct procurement in classic scenario works as if the system were extended classic. Thus your PO will be created in SRM and a copy of it will be replicated to ECC.
Regards,
Nikhil

Is plan driven procurement possible in classic scenario

hai ,
is classic scenario possible in plan driven procurement? if possible anyone give me the steps required to do it.
thanks and best regards,
n.chakradhar

Hi there,
See the link to help
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/8897267ef5eb44beb7fc578e95845e/frameset.htm
=====
Technical Scenarios
You can carry out procurement of external requirements in conjunction with the following technical scenarios of Enterprise Buyer:
·        Standalone scenario
·        Classic scenario
·        Extended classic scenario
=====
Regards,
Matthew

Self service procurement and plan driven procurement in classic scenario

hai friends,
i have configured self service procurement and now i am configuring plan driven procurement in classic scenario.my doubt is suppose a shopping cart is created and placed in a sourcing application of the professional buyer.And assume he accomplished sourcing activity and created purchase order .Now purchase order is created locally or in the backed.i am using classic scenario ,now can u tell where the purchase order is located? if i want to place that particular purchase order in SRM it self what will i do? thanks in advance.

Hi Chandra
before going to select Business scenario (self service, plan driven..etc), you must freeze the technical scenario. Depends upon your technical scenario, your PO will be created .
Where PO is created it is called leading system. It is SAP standard.
If you were selected Classic- Po created in R/3.- R/3 is a leading system .
if you were select ECS- > PO will created in SRM and Copy also will be created in R/3 system. In EBP only you can edit the PO not in r/3. here SRM is a Leading system.
regards
Muthu

How to use the direct material indicator in Plan Driven Procurement?

Dear Experts,
How the system determine the procurement as direct material procurement in Plan driven scenario? In case of manual shopping cart, the system determines the direct material /indirect material procurement based on the check box 'Order as direct material'
indicator.
Now in case of plan driven procurement, where the requisition comes from ECC system, there is no way to indicate in the MM system for direct material?
Could you please enlighten me here?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Hi Ranjan,
In case of manual shopping cart, system at that point does not know whether the material procured has inventory management maintained or material valuation. Hence we need to specify option of 'Order as direct material'.
But when requisition is created in ECC system, SAP system already is aware of direct procurement since material used will have material master / Inventory management / Material valuation / Storage location etc maintained. And the info or some indicator will be sent to front end SRM system accordingly.
Moreover it does not really matter for front-end SRM system to check whether it's a direct or indirect procurement since all procurement processes followed in SRM will be exactly same.
Hope this provides some kind of understanding for your questions.
-Ravi

Plan Driven Procurement in SRM 7.0

Hi SRM Friends,
I heard that in SRM 7.0 Plan Driven Procurement, leading PO is always created in Backend system.(Which means It is not supported by Extended classic). I am not sure if this is correct or not.
Please let me know if this is true as per standard out of Box functionality.
Thanks
Venkat

Hello Venkat,
PDP is supported with both the scenarios as mentioned by Masa.
Some key points to consider:
1. Classic scenario: Inventory/ Account assignmnet as Blank, PR if transferred to SRM result in local PO (Direct material purchase behaviour)
2. Extended classic scenario: PO in SRM does not support the service hierachy.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Ashutosh

Plan driven procurement: PO not replicated at backend

Hi Experts,
I am working with extended classic scenario (SRM 7.0 and ECC 6.0).
If I create a shopping cart and then PO at SRM, this PO is transfer to ECC sucessfully.
But for external requirements, purchase order is not replicated into ECC. So, if purchase requisitions is created at backend, transfer to SRM, PO created at SRM without errors, then PO is not replicated at backend.
No errors appear at SLG1 nor RZ20 nor SMQ1/2.
After debugging I found out that SUBTYPE field from BBP_PDIGP table is empty.
Any idea how can this issue could be solved? How can be PO replicated at ECC?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards,
Martín Amat

Hello,
You can check if there is an error returning from backend.
Follow the steps below:
- Breakpoint at FM B46B_DPO_TRANSFER;
- SE37 BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, enter PO header GUID and execute;
- Program will stop at FM where the BP was set.
- Look for statement CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination;
- F6 or F5 to debug into ERP (2nd session will start). Here you can check the table lt_bapi_return in order to check the result.
If you have a RFC with dialog user, you can debug through the ECC system and check why and when the error message is generated.
Regards,
Ricardo

Plan Driven Procurement - PR not getting transferred

Hi Experts,
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
We are on SRM 5.0 , ECC 6.0 ,Extended Classic Scenario.
I am trying to setup PDP in SRM.
RFC connections have been setup.
The required entries in the tables V_160PR and V_160EX have been maintained and mapped for the required Logical sys and Material grp.
I created a Local Company code and inside it i have created Local P.Org and P.grp and assigned the RFC user.
The required attributes have been setup as per the config guide.
I have 2 issues here.
I have 2 PR's which were generated from MRP .
Issue 1:
For one PR , when i run BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER , i can see the PR gets transferred indicated as '1' but in SMQ1 (outbound Queue of ECC ) , i see the Queue stuck up with the status "ANORETRY".
I checked the SLG1 log in SRM and i have 2 errors
1. User not Responsible for Purchasing Group of given Material
2.Transaction type for local system missing.
I created a Local Company code and flagged it as Company because i was getting an error"No address found for partner function type Ship-To Address" initially . I went through forums and per the suggestions i could resolve this error by creating the Local Company code but now i get the error "User not Responsible for Purchasing Group of given Material" in place of that.
I have initially tried with ECDP and later with ECPO but no use.
In BBP_PD, i see no Shopping carts that got created.
Issue 2:
Except the above PR, if i run the BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER report for any PR that i created later, the PR doen't even gets transferred . We are not maintaining EPRTRANS table so i dont see any entries there.
For this issue, i see nothing in SMQ1,SLG1.
What could be the probable reasons as why it is not getting transferred. And why is it that the BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER report is working for only the 1st PR and not anything else.
Any Ideas, clues...pls ...
Thanks,
Addy
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 6, 2010 4:08 PM

Issue Resolved.
Thanks,
Addy

Plan Driven Procurement in Classic scenario

Dear SAP gurus,
We are in SRM 7 EHP 1 with backend ECC 6 EHP 5. We are considering to use classic scenario, but we want to make sure that all the components are working fine. We have a scenario where MRP will be used in backend thus crearting a PR. We know that we can then push the PR to become SC in SRM then it can be processed there.
However seein note 505030 point 15, it seems that you cannot procure direct material using classic scenario. I assume that if using classic scenario, the PR of stock materials just wont go to SRM. However in other places I read that actually stock material works for classic scenario, but the PO will automatically switch to extended classic.
So which one is correct? Is:
1. For PDP and in classic environment, PR stock material NOT able to go to SRM, OR
2. For PDP and in classic environment, PR stock material can go to SRM, but when it is converted to PO it switch to extended classic.
Best regards,
John

Hi John,
The second option works in SRM.
Direct procurement in classic scenario works as if the system were extended classic. Thus your PO will be created in SRM and a copy of it will be replicated to ECC.
Regards,
Nikhil

Plan driven procurement issue in classic scenario

hi friends,
is it possible to replicate the external requirements from R3 to SRM in classic scenario .I tried to replicate the pr's from R3 to SRM.But i was unable to do it.kindly let me know the config steps required to replicate the PR from R3 to SRM sourcing cockpit.Thanks in advance
Thanks,
chakradhar

Hi,
Its certainly possible to replicate/transfer requisitions from ECC to SRM in classic scenario as mentioned by Dinesh.
Make sure the following entries and steps are implemented.
1. Entries in tables are necessary - V_T160PR and V_T160EX
2. Create SRM channel entry node in SRM organization structure and assign communication user (eg; RFC_USER) to the node. Node could be either a POrg or PGrp in the SRM root Organization.
3. Make sure the PRs from ECC are picked up by BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER BADI after approval or been released.
4. Make sure the PR requirement date and transfer date in BADI matches or use a variant for the BADI.
5. Check SMQ1 in ECC to see if the theres any Entry exists. Also check the EPRTRANS table to see if the PR still exists in table.
6. Check SLG1 in SRM to see if there are any issues in the transfer.
Once the its successfully tranfered, it will appear in Sourcing cockpit in SRM.
Let me know if you have questions.
Regards
SRM Consultant

Plan driven procurement - P.O created with existing number in SRM

We are into SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0 as backend.   Scenario is classic
We are testing PDP process, the business scenario starts with "Reservation" in R3---PR
is then generated via MRP in MM ->Transferred to SRM---> SC created through PDP
channel in SRM (ex req.request EXTR) ---> Request goes through bidding process (RFx
and RFx response) ---> Awarded RFx response creates PO in SRM .
I understand that this is OK coz, SRM creates Local P.Os even in classic scenario.
PROBLEM Description
My problem is that the P.O number of this Local P.O(created in the above steps) takes a
number that already exists in the backend and therefore this new P.O gets created in
SRM, but fails to go to backend. How can I have a different number/number range for
PDP P.Os which does not clash with regular Backend P.Os
Classic scenario:
================
a) at SRM side:
- Assigned the transaction type u201CECu201D (= the R/3 PO document type) to the attribute
DP_PROC_TY
- Attribute BSA = EC
- Define No ranges for SC and follow on documents u2013 u201CPOu201D is defined as Internal number
range (3000000000 to 3009999999)
- Define No range per Backend system (No range for P.Os = PO)
- Define No range for local PO (Number Range PO = 3000000000 to 3009999999 as
internal number range)
- Assigned the local/backend PO number range(Number range PO) as a internal number
range to the transaction type u201CECu201D u2013 against BUS2201
b) at R/3 side:
- Enter the Number Range PO(corresponding to the SRM number range PO) and
flag it as an external number range (trx. OMH6 Number Range for
Purchasing Documents). Values 3000000000 to 3009999999 (External)
- Maintain the document type u201CECu201D corresponding to the SRM transaction type u201CECu201D
and assign the R/3 number range for POs as "NoRge Ext" (field
V_T161-NUMKE) (trx. Document type within Purchase Order Customizing). Number
Range here is also u201CPOu201D to match SRM
My questions are:
1) Is it necessary to have u201CPOu201D as number range under u201CDefine number range for
Local P.Osu201D since this is a classic scenario
2) Is the current number being picked up from here(number range for local P.Os) for
creating PDP purchase orders(which are basically local P.Os). Can I have a
different number range here from what I have maintained in u201CDefine No range per
Backend systemu201D
3) What is the way to use u201CECDPu201D as an additional document type? Can it have a
different number range other than u201CPOu201D that I have set now?
4) Where did I go wrong?

Bharadwaj,
Thanks for that promt response
Your point#1
1. Number range you defined for PO in "Define Num range per Backend System for Follow-on doc".
e.g :
backend PO - 10000 29999
local PO - 30000 49999
> I can only have one PO range per backend system and I have only one backend system and I have already maintained the backend PO number range here... How can I maintain the local P.O number range in "Define Num range per Backend system"?
Your pont#2
2.Make sure above number range is maintained in "Define Num range per Shopping Cart and Follow-on doc" and it should be Internal num range.
SRM IMG ->Supplier Relationship Management->SRM Server->Cross-Application Basic Settings->Number Ranges->SRM Server Number Ranges->Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Documents
number range of POs .
Po number range for local and backend PO should be diff since if it is ordered as a direct , local PO will be created in SRM rather than in R/3 system. this PO document type also must be mapped in r/3.
> Can you please provide the proper path ? Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Documents
---number range of POs .
I do understand that I need to have two number ranges.. How do I achieve this? Can you please explain this?
Saji George
Edited by: Saji George on Nov 17, 2010 8:21 AM
Edited by: Saji George on Nov 17, 2010 8:22 AM

Plan Driven Procurement - Error message "Structure 01 CP 10170237 CP-S-O

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for