Plan issue

Hi,
I have a requirement and it has both actuals and plan as my scenarios. How do I restric the data entry for users for my acutuals .
I am new to this . pls help
Franc

Hi ,
1. Yes, its indeed a basic question.
2. Actuals and Plan, these are part of your scenario dimension. For these , you have start year ,end year and like wise start month and end month.
3. With the help of your start year/month and end year/moth, you create data form and select the appropriate scenario dimension member
4. In your case, for your actuals , set your start year and month and end yr and month as per your requirement. This will let only acutuals to be entered for a limted time as you had set
5. You ll understand more , if you open the application and re-read looking at the properties of scenario members
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsutlancy.com/

Similar Messages

Planned issue

Hi,
We are usig REM scenario. We require a report which shows the actual issues & planned issues for the components & the variance. Actual issues ca be obtained from table MSEG through movement types. How to get planned issues considering that a component may be used in many BOM's.
Matter very critical.
regards,
Mohit Goyal

Thanks Srikanth for promp reply.
But i am not looking for PIR data. I need standard issues of the component as per the BOM.
For example a component is used in 5 BOM's. Now corresponding to actual issue of the component , planned/standard issue is required for the component. This way we can further calculate the variance.
Hopefully the requirement is clear.
regards,
Mohit Goyal

Workspace - planning issue.

HI,
I have issue with logging into workspace and opening a planning application.
I am able to login into workspace without an issue .
Before that . I have configured using IIS ( instead of apache ) on port number 80 and with weblogic 45000.
Now, i am able to open it on both 80 and 45000, and I see the following error in both the cases.
The errors are :
1. Invalid or could not find module configuration.
2. Required application module HyperionPlanning.planning is not configured. Please contact your administrator.
3. Communication Error
I have seen the errors in other posts of the forum. but In my case it does not work both on 80 and 45000.
pls help.

Hi,
If you can't access planning through http://<planning machine>/HyperionPlanning/ then IIS set up must not of been successful.
By default it uses a isapi redirect filter to redirect from IIS to the correct port of say planning.
It is picked up from \Hyperion\common\appServers\Tomcat\5.0.28\isapi\isapi_redirect-1.2.14.dll
If you go into IIS management and select properties for your web server, under the ISAPI filters tab you should see the status of the filter.
It is configured using the property files :- uriworkermap.properties and workers.properties
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Subquery execution plan issue

Hi All,
Oracle v11.2.0.2
I have a SELECT query which executes in less than a second and selects few records.
Now, if I put this SELECT query in IN clause of a DELETE command, that takes ages (even when DELETE is done using its primary key).
See below query and execution plan.
Here is the SELECT query
SQL> SELECT   ITEM_ID
2                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
3                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
4                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
5                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
6                                          COLUMN1,
7                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
8 ));
   ITEM_ID
74206192
1 row selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:40.87
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3153606419
| Id | Operation          | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |             |     2 |    38 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | CONCATENATION     |             |       |       |            |          |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN | PK_TABLE1   |     1 |    19 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN| PK_TABLE1   |     1 |    19 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%')
       filter("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%' AND REGEXP_LIKE
              ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'))
   3 - access("COLUMN1"='SomeValue1234')
       filter(LNNVL("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%') OR LNNVL(
              REGEXP_LIKE ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$')))
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          8 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        348 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        360 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedNow see the DELETE command. ITEM_ID is the primary key for TABLE2
SQL> delete from TABLE2 where ITEM_ID in (
2 SELECT   ITEM_ID
3                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
4                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
5                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
6                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
7                                          COLUMN1,
8                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
9 ))
10 );
1 row deleted.
Elapsed: 00:02:12.98
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 173781921
| Id | Operation               | Name                        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | DELETE STATEMENT        |                             |     4 |   228 | 63490   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|   1 | DELETE                 | TABLE2                      |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS          |                             |     4 |   228 | 63490   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE          |                             |     1 |    19 | 63487   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|* 4 |     INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_TABLE1_3                  |     1 |    19 | 63487   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|* 5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN     | PK_TABLE2                   |     7 |   266 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - filter("COLUMN1"='SomeValue1234' OR "COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%' AND
              REGEXP_LIKE ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'))
   5 - access("ITEM_ID"="ITEM_ID")
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          5 db block gets
     227145 consistent gets
     167023 physical reads
        752 redo size
        765 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1255 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          3 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedWhat can be the issue here?
I tried NO_UNNEST hint, which made difference, but still the DELETE was taking around a minute (instead of 2 minutes), but that is way more than that sub-second response.
Thanks in advance

rahulras wrote:
SQL> delete from TABLE2 where ITEM_ID in (
2 SELECT   ITEM_ID
3                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
4                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
5                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
6                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
7                                          COLUMN1,
8                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
9 ))
10 );
The optimizer will transform this delete statement into something like:
delete from table2 where rowid in (
    select t2.rowid
    from
        table2 t2,
        table1 t1
    where
            t1.itemid = t2.itemid
    and     (t1.column1 = etc.... )
)With the standalone subquery against t1 the optimizer has been a little clever with the concatenation operation, but it looks as if there is something about this transformed join that makes it impossible for the concatenation mechanism to be used. I'd also have to guess that something about the way the transformation has happened has made Oracle "lose" the PK index. As I said in another thread a few minutes ago, I don't usually look at 10053 trace files to solve optimizer problems - but this is the second one today where I'd start looking at the trace if it were my problem.
You could try rewriting the query in this explicit join and select rowid form - that way you could always force the optimizer into the right path through table1. It's probably also possible to hint the original to make the expected path appear, but since the thing you hint and the thing that Oracle optimises are so different it might turn out to be a little difficult. I'd suggest raising an SR with Oracle.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

Contract , billing plan issue

Hello
I am having issue where I have cancelled billing document corresponding to a contract, then also I canu2019t rebill the contract. I found in the header billing plan the status is showing is B(Partially processed) which is partially processed and for a line item it is showing C(Completely processed), though I have cancelled all the invoices. Can some one help.
David

David
Try running reports SDVBUK00 and RVV05IVB to correct the status and/or billing index after carefully reading their documentation.
Hope this helps.

Costcenter planning issue

hi guys,
I am facing with a problem like when i am trying to use the t.code: KP06 To use the cost center planning it is asking for a planner profile. i had tried to use the default profiles but it is giving an error like Entry does not exist in TKA50 (check entry).
Please tell me how to solve the issue.

Dear,
Use Path
SPRO > Controlling > Cost Center Accounting > Planning > Manual Planning > Define User-Defined Planner Profiles.
Select the profile you want and click on General Controlling.
Select Cost ctrs: Cost element/activity inputs then click on Layout for Controlling and enter layout created by you or enter any existing one.
Once you have done all settings here go to KP06 and use SETTINGS > SET PLANNER PROFILE and enter the profile you maintained settings for.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Milestone Invoicing Plan Issue

Hi All,
We have successfully configured Milestone Invoicing Plan Scenario, but are facing one issue. We were successfully able to transfer PS invoicing plan to PO. After milestone is confirmed when we go to check PO in DISPLAY mode, block is still there. If we just switch to CHANGE mode in PO without doing anything else, the block disappears. Hence the functionality appears to be working but we have to switch to change mode and save PO once.Please let us know if anyone faced this issue earlier and what was the resolution.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ankesh,
It's the standard behavior in SAP. Contacted OSS.. no help. finally with the Help of WF and PO maintain BAPI we made that to Work

SQL Server Maintenance Plan Issue

SQL Server Version:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.5000.00 (Intel X86)
Dec 10 2010 10:56:29
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
Issue : Maintenance Plan - DB backup plan & TRN Log backup plan skipped / some times not deleting the old backup files.
Error : Failed to retrieve date for this request (Microsoft.SqlServer.SmoEnum)
Additional Informaiton
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch.
(Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
A Server error occurred on the current command.
The results, if any should be discarded (Microsoft Sql Server)
Any experts can help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks
drmrpush
MRVSFLY

Hello,
Same issue reported here:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/601fd83c-c49f-4bf8-b69d-95431197652d/maintenance-plan-is-not-opening-on-sql-server-2005-sp2?forum=sqlkjmanageability
Please check solution on :
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/3e53ba8b-ea23-4629-98db-43c80ba9888e/cannot-save-maintenance-plans?forum=sqltools
This problem occurs if some of the stored procedures while installing SP2 has not been applied successfully. So manually run the script below and it may resolve
your issue. It resolved ours and we went throught exact same process of re-installing several times.
                1)
First go to the folder Install . The default location is this = “C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Install “ .
Please post back still your issue not resolves.
2)
Then in this folder find this “sysdbupg.sql” .
3)
Please open this script with a nodepad.
4)
Then copy the
whole script and then paste it in the Query window of the Management studio.
5)
Then execute this script.
6)
Once this script has been successfully executed, The issue should be resolved.
Regards, Pradyothana DP. Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue. Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue. ========================================================== http://www.dbainhouse.blogspot.in/

Workforce planning- issue with available capacity

Hi All,
I have an issue in workforce planning. I have created a workcentre and have entered the required details in capacity tab to arrive at available capacity. The available capacity for this workcentre is visible in transaction CM01.
I have done the workforce palnning using worcentre view in transaction CMP3, but for some reason I am unable to see the workcentre avaliabile capacity. I only see the distributed total requirements.
Would appreciate any pointers on this.
Regards
Pradeesh

Regarding the availablity of CMP3, it refers the availability of assigned persons rather than the work centers.
Please check the involved person with transaction PA30 using infotype 007
(see details in consultant note 543362).
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Load Plan issue

Hi Experts,
I have created 3 load plans as below:
1. LP_Stag
2. LP_DWH
3. LP_Main
The flow is as below:
LP_Main - Serial steps
Step 1: Set variables
Step 2: Calling LP_Stag using odistartloadplan
Step 3: Calling LP_DWH using odistartloadplan
Step 4: A procedure updating error_log tables
Everything in LP_Main is executing serially, the only issue is that step 4 is not considering the child process of LP_Stag and LP_DWH
Step 3 and 4 is getting executed in seconds since it only has 1 step to start the load plan. This is treating LP_Stag and LP_DWH independently. Step 3 is not waiting for step 2 (Entire LP_Stage and its child) to get complete. Similarly, Step 4 is not waiting to complete (LP_DWH and its childs).
How I want it to Happen:
Step 3 should be started only if LP_Stag and its steps get complete. Similarly, Step 4, should be started once, LP_DWH and its steps are completed. The errog_log procedure is executed in parallel with LP_DWH and its steps.
Pls help.
I can create only single LP, however, I am looking solution to this issue.
Thanks,
Andy

Hi
have you check the constraint on table level in ODI studio>Designer>Model tab>Source table
Regards,
Phanikanth

WebLogic 10.2 Annotation Override/Deployment Plan Issue

We're migrating applications from WLS 9.2.1 over to 10.2. When we create the deployment plan and configure the overrides we find that some of the web service controls overrides are ignored and the defaults are used.
This was not an issue for 9.2.1 and I've not been able to find any information about this.
Has anyone experienced this before?
Chris

This issue turned out to be a missing target during the ant build process.

Planning issue

Hi Gurus,
I've an issue . Materials are planned on the Weekend days even factory calender is working only five days./week And in MRP screens We assigned the Planning calender with weekly lot size.
With Reagrds,
Laxman

Looks like your PLanning calender is not in sync with factory calendor.
Regards
Ratan

Capacity planning issue

Dear all
My customer has two actor types: project managers PM and 7 work center managers WCM, with strong antithesis: PM looks at project quality and productivity; WCM looks at his resources capacity planning.
Every PM defines wbs basic start / finish dates with appropriate, large and comfortable time lag. Into this time lag, during the capacity planning, the WCMs can set definitive activity start / finish dates, by their needs (and with user status communicates to PM the happened choice) .
The generic project is composed of more wbs elements and 7 networks: all activities of a generic network are assigned to only one work center. Every lowest wbs element has only one activity.
Every PM plans dates (large and comfortable) and efforts on network activities; schedules via bottom up and copies wbs scheduled dates on basic dates. After, CP sets the top down scenario and save the project. In IMG, network profile, the type of checking during top-down time scheduling is u201CEu201D: exit with error (transaction code OPUU).
Every WCM using transaction code CM01 doesnu2019t see the WBS constrains. So doesnu2019t know the wbs dates range. Moreover the WCMs donu2019t like a dashboard like CM01 because it is not user friendly. They prefer a graphical dashboard.
My personal idea to resolve this issue is use transaction code CM21 or similar with the display of wbs time lag. Is it possible?
Is there anyone who could help me, please? I am also interested in other technical solution.
Thanks in advance.
Salvo50

Venky,
1) Sales order when enter in the system can perform the capacity availability check ?
Not in ECC/R/3. However, in APO this is possible.
2) The delivery dates & confirmation in the sales order is on what basis?
Depends on how you have configured your availability check. There are a number of possibilities. Many companies confirm MTS orders to Total Replenishment Lead time in the Material master. Other companies leave the orders unconfirmed until Planning has created supply elements (production orders).
As far as the delivery date is concerned, it can also start with the confirmed material availability date as calculated by ATP, and then additionally schedule in the warehouse pick-pack-load times, and route transit time (the time it takes to move the shipment from your loading dock to the customer's location.
In 'Assemble to order' (a special version of Make To Order) it is possible to confirm to the scheduling time of the supporting Finished goods production orders combined with the availability of the components of the FG production order.
In R/3, some companies will confirm the MTS sales order to a date that is farther into the future than the actual estimated process time including capacity backlog. Then, they run MRP to create planned orders. Then, they run Capacity leveling. Then, they run BackOrderProcessing (rescheduling) of the sales orders to re-confirm to the planned or production orders that have been capacity leveled. In this way, Sales orders are indirectly confirmed to capacity.
Consult with your local SD and PP ATP experts to discover the options available.
Rgds,
DB49
Edited by: Dogboy49 on Jan 6, 2010 10:37 PM

Plan issues

I am a brand new customer but am thinking of leaving already. I purchased a new IPhone with a single line plan $60 a month 1GB data online. Phone arrived but had trouble activating and porting my old number so after much discussion with the help line we just got a new number. When I received my first bill I was charged for a More Everything Plan (not what I wanted). I was on the phone last night for an hour with customer service who kept telling me she could not find the plan I was talking about (I had it up on my computer screen and it was on my receipt) asked to talk to supervisor but kept being put on hold because one was not available. The lady came back saying she found a plan similar to the one I had and switched me to that one. If this is how they treat band new customers I can only imagine how it will be as the years go on. If the new plan does not meet the original plan I signed up for I will be sending my new phone back (still within the 30 days). Has anyone else had such issues?????

It is 14 days not 30 days.
Check your online MY Verizon account and see if anything was changed.
Good Luck

Quality Plan issue

Hi,
I have subcontracting material which was processing from one subcontractor,I have created quality plan for the material.
For such subcontractor, material posting to QA after GRN, Also There is no issue of UD,
But When I receive same material from another subcontractor, Material posted to QA, But when i go to RESULT tab , system give message as NO CHARACTERISTICS ARE CREATED. I have already created quality plan & inspection characteristics.
Ihave also attached Quality info records for the subcontractor,
Regards,
Deven

Hi,
If you have same material code for all the vendor and you have activated QM view the system will post the stock to quality.And there should not be any error like this.Still check the QM activation and quality plan assignment date as well as GRN date for the reffered P.O in terms of posting date.
If you have different material for all vendor then assign all the materials seperately to the inspaction plan.
Hope this will help.
regards,
kaushik

ECC plan issue

On running an ECC plan with resource constraint only, planned orders are getting generated at the end of planning horizon, though there is demand next week.
Details
Demand for a bom item of qty 2 on 28th May. Routing for this item has a resource with usage of 12 Hr. so 2 qty should get schedule on a day.There are components in BOM with max purchasing lead time of 7 days only. Planned order is getting generated with Need by date of 28-May but Sugg start and Due date of 10-Dec-2010 (end of planning horizon)
Please suggest what is driving this behaviour.

We had similar issue with ECC plan. We were using a common resource (which was not CTP enabled), on all routings for lead time rollup calculation. We also have some capacity resources.
To resolve the issue, we created a resource group and added it to all capacity resources. In the ECC plan for the 'Calculate Resource Requirements' we selected 'Bottleneck Resource' and included the Resource Group.
This resolve our issue.
If you are using similar setup, this will help.
We have another issue under the thread 'ECC Plan Resource Availability is Considered before Component is Available' in the forum. We appreciate any help in this.
Regards,
Vijay

Plan issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for