Planned activity & actual acitivity
We are developing a Z-report.could you please help me on how to retrieve the information pertaining to planned activity type like machine hrs . We are able to retrieve the information of actual machine hours. What i understand is that planned machine hours data is not stored in a table.
Hi,
The planned hours are nothing but the standard values defined in the routing in CA01/02/03. Table PLPO,PLKO.
The Actual values you can take from confirmations. AFRU-order confirmations.
thanks and regards
Murugesan
Similar Messages
-
Planned Activity and Actual Activity Fields & relevenat table
Hello,
Can any one pls let me know the field and Table names for the following two fields (need for preperation of a report):
PLANNED ACTIVITY: - Production Order confirmation Planned Activity column
ACTUAL ACTIVITY: - Production Order confirmation Actaul Activity column
thanks & regards
Chaitanya RayaproluHi,
Procedure :
go to the feild(Cursor in feild) press"F1" for help ( Pop up will appear )
click on "technical help"( Icon with cross planting of hammers)
from the small popup u can get Feild name and table or Struc.
copy the feild name.
go to Transaction "se16"(Tables) enter "DD03L" ( data base table ) and press enter.
enter the feild name ( Copied earlier ) in feild name block and execute(F8) the table.
You will see all the tables and structures containing the particular feild.
This is the best solution to be self sufficient.
please close the thread after testing the solution...and appreciate your reward.
Prakash -
Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing
Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1 E LAB10 994310 2.00 2.00 AED 1.0 HR Labour Cost New
2 E DIE20 994320 5.00 5.00 AED 1.0 HR Diesel Cost New
3 E ELE30 994330 1.00 1.00 AED 1.0 HR Electricity Cost
4 M 1100000042 5.00 0.00 AED 1 PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5 G 994201 0.00 0.00 AED Depriciation Cost
6 G 994202 0.00 0.00 AED Sales & Distribution Cost
13.00 AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67
2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
Labour Cost New 2.00
Diesel Cost New 5.00
Electricity Cost 1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 00.00
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 4.00
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 5.00
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 2.00
16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area 1000 Controlling Area
Cycle ZELE01 Status Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle 994215 Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per 100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB01 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE02 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE03 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE20 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE30 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB10 183.35
1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy Object Name AUn Act Qty Total price Price (Fixed) PUnit
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 Production Dxb HR 5.0 366.66 366.66 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.65 916.65 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.75 916.75 10
2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00- 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33 183.35
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33 183.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67 183.33
2.67- 542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar ChinchkarDear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
QTY 3.1 Tot Price 3,709.68 Planned(FIX) 3,709.68 Per Units 10
(System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 - 558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total - 965.57
4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
PL Act Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar -
Actual or plan activity as var portion type in cylce
hi,
i see in receiver tracing factor in cycle, there is a variable portion type actual activity and plan activity.
May I know what is the use if we choose actual activity or plan activity because normally we are using SKF.
For AT, normally it is fixed where rate in kp46 and quantity in kb21n.
may i know if there is actual or plan activity in cycle receiver tracing factor, how can it work? i mean where to define the rate and quantity?
thanksVariable portions indicate that the tracing factors are determined automatically from the totals record file. You define the criteria for this database access in the Tracing Factor screen.
As an example, Sender A distributes $100,000 to three receivers. The tracing factors are the actual costs.
Receiver Cost Element Amount
B 430000 $2000
C 430000 $1000
D 430000 $2000
Total $5000
The SAP system calculates the following values:
Receiver B: 100,000/5000 X 2000 = $40,000
Receiver C: 100,000/5000 X 1000 = $20,000
Receiver D: 100,000/5000 X 2000 = $40,000
Actual consumption is also similar to above, in the sense that it reads the value in cost elements of the receivers objects. Whereas actual activity will make the tracing factor to read the values posted in the activity types.
You can see the Receiving tracing factor change as you change the type. -
Planned and Actual costs at the Activity level
Hi all,
Can you tell me if there is a R/3 report which lists out the planned and actual costs for a project and displays it for each network and activity? I want these values at the activity level.
I found a report which lists out these values for each network, but I cannot drilldown to the activity level. Please help.
Thanks,
Satyajit.Hi,
There is setting in network type. Please go through transaction OPUV i.e.
Change view- Network type paramaeters : overview " Overview.
Uner Network type parameters there is one radio button in front of ActvtyAcctAssgn. Just activate it.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tushar -
Planned cost & actual cost are same in process order.
hi,
I have created new order type for process order.
when i made process order & i going for confirmation in cor6n , on screen fixed & variable overheads values are coming which system had taken from receipe.
when i did changes in that values which are in hrs & confirm & settle the order, in cost analysis plan cost & Actual cost was seem to be same.
I dont get why this is happen ? is there any config in order type.
thanks in advance.
regard
sanjay.Check in cost analysis, IN plan VS actual Is activity is available?
I feel U haven't maintain activity type in costing view of workcenter -
Target cost, planned cost, actual cost difference
Hi!
As per my understanding , the target cost, planned cost, actual will be calculated like blow:
Actual cost = Actual quanity * Actual price ( standard price or moving average price) existed at the time of goods movement.
Planned cost = Planned quantity * Planned price ( standard price or moving average price) existed at the time of production order release based on valuation variant strategy.
Target cost = Planned Quantity * Actual price ( standard price or moving average price) when calculating variances.
whether above formulas are correct?
I have one scenario, where in process order, I am not seeing Planned quanity for compoenent/raw material, but target quanity is existed. How it is possible. When I have checked the BOM in process order, the BOM does not contain the componenet.
regs,
rameshHi,
Target Cost = Costs as per the standard cost estimate * Actual Qty delivered.
For e.g. Std cost for one unit of material-x is as follows.
RM 1 - 10kg * 10 /- = 100
Activity 1 - 5 Hr * 50 /- = 250
If the actual delivery from the production is 2 units, then target cost will update as
Under Goods Issue, RM 1 - (10kg*2units) * 10 /- = 200
Under Confirmations, Activity 1 - (5 Hr*2units) * 50/- = 500
Total = 200+500 = 700
Target cost for goods issue/confirmation of activities will update only when the Goods receipt has been done but not at the time of goods issue or Confirmation of activities.
Target cost for Goods Receipt will update only when the variance has been calculated for the order.
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta G -
Price indicator - 004 plan & 008 Actual
Hi Experts,
I have checked the documentation for price indicator and understand that price indicator 004 and 008 are active when we activate purely iterative in CO version maintainance.
Now my question is how can we select 004 while planning and how system select 008 and how system perform calculation for plan and actual.
I would like to you the system calculation for Actual if 008 is price indicator.
Thanks
RajHi Surya
Take F1 help at 'Variance value....... (on actual price indicator) It says :
008 (Selecting version maintenance):The actual price of the activity type is caluclated purely iteratively. If you activate the indicator
Purely iterative price
in the version, the R/3 System calculates an iterative price along with the price resulting from planning
Regards
Rajneesh -
Planning activity price in various currency
Hi,
I have controlling area with currency EUR and two company code linked to it:
Company code A with currency EUR
Company code B with currency MXN
Is there any way to plan activity price in USD?
Thanks in advance
RegardsHi ,
THere are 3 currencies which are available in CO. One is the CO Area currency ( the currency maintained in the CO Area ) , Second is the Object currency ( the currency maintained in the Object , if it is a Cost Center , then the Object currency will be the Company code currency to which the CC belongs to ) and Third is the Transaction currency ( the currency in which a transaction is posted , be it Plan transaction or Actual transactions ) .
You can enter cost element planning using any of those currencies ( by creating user defined layouts if std layouts do not suffice requirements ).
Activity output has to be planned in terms of quantities in Cost Centers.
Activity price is to be computed automatically in the system ( recommended ) . Activity prices are always maintained in only two currencies , Object currency and Co Area currency. All activity transactions will happen using the Object currency so that the absorption on Cost Centers is always proper.
We cannot have activity prices maintained in transaction currencies. Is there a real justification and a business reason to have the price to be maintained in USD ? Please let me know.
Regards,
Venkat. -
Process after planning activity rates in CO
Hi:
My question may sound very basic to you but please bear with me as i am new to this process. I have defined planned activity rates for two cost centers in CO.. Now i want to do the PP process using these cost centers. These cost centers contains rate for FOH,VOH and LABOR. I want to do PP process because only then i will be able to create standard cost estimate run and actual price calculation with variance analysis. We open process order as we are in fast moving consumer group company. Please guide me through the process. Any help will be highly appreciated.
BrHi,
If standard cost estimate is your goal, process orders have nothing to do with it.
Afterwards, you will be able to do cost object controlling, to control production costs.
These subjects are vast, and I don't think that you should expect to learn them in such a forum. Nevertheless, provided that your CO settings for standard cost estimate exist and are correct, on the PP side you need to have the so called "quantity structure", which basically covers your variable costs; in other words, a BOM and a Master Recepie.
In the phase of a MR you use a resource; you should link the cost center to the resource, and the avtivity type to the phase standard values.
Then you are able to run the SCE. There's also a later procedure of releasing these estimates.
Production cost controlling is even more complex.
In general, I think that it is a good idea that you get help from a knowledgeable person in the beginning. -
Reg:Planned and Actual POC
Hi,
I have one requirement in progress analysis that system can find out the date wise planned and actual POC e.g:-
A1 activity having ear start date -01.03.2011 fin date- 15.03.2011
A1 Actual date-01.03.2011 to 03.03.2011 processing =30%
But when i run CNE1 and putting To Period =march 2011 and then cne5 system is showing result month wise planned and actual poc.
My requirement is to get planned POC as per date .If i will select for 3 days then planned POC also comes for 3 days and not for 15 days(01-mar to 15-mar)
We want to use progress analysis for activity date only
Progress version-100
Planned method- Time Proportionality.
Actual Method-Degree of processing from confirmation
So when we confirmed the activity 30% then in actual POC it is showing 30 and in plan also for 3days(01.03.2011 to 03.03.2011).
With Regards
Rohit PrakashHi,
Please read the following link
<Link deleted by moderator>
Hope this will help you
BR
Anjali
Edited by: Virendra Pal on Mar 3, 2011 12:34 PM
No spoon feeding please - Rohit should be able to search himself -
Is there standard report for planned and actual devlivery date?
Hi Guru,
Could you help me to find standard report to compare planned delivery date in PO and actual delivery date (GR Posting date)?
I wonder, Is there standard report for planned and actual delivery date?
or I have to create a customizing report.
Thank you very much.hi
i dont think it is possible to see both in one pan so try to create some Z report
u try ME80fn here u have to change the views ,in del shedule view u can see the delivery dtae and in PO histry view u can see the posting date
regards
kunal -
Planned vs Actual Cost Report (with variance) for PM Orders
Hi Experts,
We are using the project system to collate order costs for annual shut work. We have a requirement for a report to show 25% variance between planned and actual order costs (maintneance order).
At this stage, we dont mind whether this is implemented in the the PM system, or the PS system.
This is a fairly basic / common requirment. Are there any standard transactions we could use to:
1. Select a list of orders using standard selection criteria.
2. Select a % for variance, e.g. 25%
3. Display a list of orders where the planned vs actual costs were greater than 25% and what the actual variance is for each order?
Thanks,
MaikelHi Maikel,
I have never seen any such scenario, but the best thing that can come to me is for the shut down activities you muct have created a Revision, then based on that Revision you can take a dump of all the orders with Planned and Actual Cost, in the excel, and there by putting the formulae you can definitely have the Varience report.
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Yawar Khan -
Function module for calculating planned and actual cost of production order
Hi ,
Do we have any standard function module for calculating planned and actual cost for production order?
i need to implement this in a Z-report.
Thanks
SriniHi,
try below function module
CRMCO_GET_PLAN_ACTUAL_COSTS
CO_IH_GET_PLANNED_COSTS_TOTAL
Regards,
Sankaran -
How to differentiate b/w Plan and actual data
Hi,
How to differentiate b/w plan nad actual data.
Is that value type or Version InfoObject??
What should be the value for that and how it gets populated ??
Regards,Hello Tapan,
The plan and actual data is differentiated on the basis of value of infoobject 0VTYPE. Value 10 is for actual. Different plan versions can be differentiated by different values of infoobject 0VERSION.
These values are populated when actual data is loaded or plan data is entered.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Praveen
Maybe you are looking for
-
SL3000 + FC-SCSI connection to Solaris 10 x86, Update 6 won't configure
Hi all, A summary: 1. New SL3000 installed and configured 2. SL3000 is connected/zoned into FC switches presenting itself over FC-SCSI port to Solaris 10 x86 update 6 (fully patched) hosts 3. Appears on fabric like so: Jul 4 18:48:05 storehost fctl:
-
Creation of Variables in BEx reporting
Hi, I want to know the Creation process or steps for creation of variables in BEx Reporting. Please let me know. Thanks & Best Regards, Venkata.
-
how can I turn off icloud so that I can continue to synch my iphone to Window Contacts
-
Need to Know How to Group Report in 30-Second Time Intervals
I am trying to group records in the report based on a date/time field in a table. The user enters a date/time range to report on, and I want the the records from the table that fall within the date/time range entered to be grouped in 30-second inter
-
DIAdem GPI: import groups in Data Portal
Hello, I've developed a GPI-DLL to import my XML file, with the GPI extension toolkit (10.2). So now, from my GPI, I can read the XML file (C++ function), but I don't know how to create a group in the data portal, (then the channel). Which function c