Planned Delivery Cost Settlement (MDRC)

Hi All,
I tired so many ways to settle planned delivery costs through MDRC since ERS don't settle the delivery costs. I keep getting "No values for this selection" msg. I made sure I fill in the correct information at the intial screen.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!

Hi Duke
I still unable to see MDRC tcode anywhere....
i have not understood ur query also, if u want to settle planned delivery cost it will be captured at the time of GR to freight clearing account.
The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
Regards
Yogesh

Similar Messages

Planned delivery cost & sub-sequent settlements

hi ,
what is meant by planned delivery cost ?
what is meant by sub-sequent settlements ?
when they are useful in MM
regards

Hi
<b>Planned delivery costs</b> are the costs agreed with the vendor or goods supplier before the purchase order is created. You enter these as conditions in the purchase order.
Planned delivery costs can be differentiated as follows:
Origin of Costs
Freight charges
Customs charges
Calculation of Costs
Fixed amount, irrespective of delivered quantity
Quantity-dependent amount
<b>Subsequent adjustment</b>
In sub contracting scenario After the subcontractor had delivered the ordered material , you post the goods receipt to the subcontract PO. The system determines the necessary components for each purchase order item and creates for each component a goods issue item with the quantity that was determined in the purchase order
If the vendor informs you after these postings that a greater or smaller quantity of the subcontracting components was actually consumed than planned in the purchase order, you must post a subsequent adjustment to correct the component consumption.
If the component is a by-product, you must post the corrected by-product receipt (excess receipt) or by-product issue (short receipt)
Similary there is a subsequent credit / debit carried out when an additional invoice or credit memo is received for a transaction that has already been invoiced in LIV process
Thanks & regards
Kishore

Planned Delivery Costs Posting in MRRL

Hello Experts,
We have ERS active in our system for regular consumprion items. These are the items where the price settled is inclusive of packing anf forwarding charges. There is no issue of LIV for these invoices.
But when in a Purchase order any other charges are loaded such as Packing, Forwarding etc. these charges fall under planned delivery costs in terms of LIV. And these charges are not captured at the time of LIV through ERS.
Does anybody aware of any userexit or SAP note which will help me capturing these charges in ERS as well.
Early response will be appreciated as I want to transfer all plant purchases' invpoice verification on ERS.
Thnaks & Regards,
Rahul Puranik.

As per SAP Standard system, it is not possible to post the planned deliver cost thro' ERS or by MRRL.

ERS for Return Items with Planned Delivery Costs also as credit

Hi
I have the requirement to process ERS-Returns (MRRL) where I need to have a credit memo for the product cost and the planned delivery costs incurred with the original order. ($15,000 for product and $1200 for delivery costs = Credit Memo for $16,200) I have tested this extensively but in all situations the planned delivery costs creates an 'invoice' not a credit memo.
Has anybody encountered this requirement? If so, were you able to resolve without implementing an enhancement?
Thanks.

For delivery costs you need to maintain the following customizing:
> OLMR
    > Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
      > Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
The flag controls whether to include or exclude planned delivery costs
from automatic settlement.
Regarding the planned delivery cost, it will not listed in
transaction MRRL. This is the standard SAP design. Instead, please
use transaction MRDC.

MIRO-Planned delivery Cost

Hi,
We have made a PO where there is a problem with one of the wrong condition type(Transit Insurance) which does not have any secondary vendor assingement,but the condition type is having Account key (Other Clearing)
As the MIRO-Planned delivery Cost Conditions for Sec Vendors Such as
Basci Customs, Excise, octroi, are allready posted& the GR for this material is allredy done & the material is allready issued
the value which is lying in the other Clearing account needs to be settled as there is no vendor assingemnt to this condition type we are finding it difficult where to nullify this account
Please suggest what can be done

Hi
Now that you have already posted the Transit insurance amount , I suppose you are getting the amount against the material supply vendor. One way for you to settle the expenses is to use the JV - FB60 for this to remove the amoutn and reassign the other vendor in FI
Regards

Distribute planned delivery cost into all open POs when post FI vendor invo

Hi,
We planned transport cost in PO usning condition type but we post the freight invoice monthly for freight vendor using F-43 with out refernce to POs.
So POs always expect a freight invoce,ends up with GR/IR clearing balance and so we can't archive these POs now.
Now we are looking for a new solution that to distribute monthly freight invoice amt into all those open invoices when we post a FI freight invoice for vendor (F-43).
Please do suggest any user exit or BADI to check for open POs for that vendor when post F-43.
hope to hear your reply soon. Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Jagadheshwar

Hi
Since it is planned delivery cost, I belive the Freight posting would have happened at MIGO itself.... i.e. the Freight amount would have been inventorized or posted into consumption account in the case of account assigned PO... Is this understandng correct?
If yes, then ideally you should be passing entry using F-02, Dr the GR/IR account and Crediting the Vendor account... Allow manual posting for GR/IR in FS00... populate the PO No in GR/IR account while doing the posting.... Then you can clear them...
Ideally, you should not have had planned delvery cost, if you are not booking the invoice PO wise....
If you are getting the freight invoice for each PO separately, you can do ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement)... Which means system would automatically Dr the Gr/IR and Credit the vendor.... You dont need to wait for the invoice.... This is usually done for trusted vendors
Br, Ajay M

Planned Delivery Cost - MRDC

Hi,
I am trying to settle planned delivery cost maintained in PO through condition type - FRB1.
Also maintained tcode details in table t169f.
Did configuration in node - MM - LIV - ERS - maintained required details for the vendor
I did GR against the PO.
Now I am executing MRDC, nothing happens?
Did I miss any step?
Please revert.
Regards,
Dipak

Hi
check this
add your freight vendor to configuration transaction: Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > ERS > Specify Automatic Settlement for Planned Delivery Costs.
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Error doing ERS for planned delivery costs

Hello!
We post the freight for STOs via the FRB1 condition as our delivery costs. The freight vendor is of course, different from the vendor in the STO itself which is the plant. The freight vendor is marked for ERS settlement and the ERS works fine for it from the shipment cost documents of sales orders. However, while doing the ERS in transaction MRRL for the same freight vendor for planned delivery costs, nothing comes up in the list to settle. The delivery has been goods issued and freight accounted for. What could be going wrong here? What do I need to check?
Thanks!

OK, I got this issue resolved...don't know what was wrong and I didn't change anything but it is working now Freaky. But I do have one more related issue - hopefully someone can shed some light on it. For the freight vendor, we have a different PI partner in the vendor master set up by the plants - when I do the ERS, it is not creating the A/P against that different Invoicing Party (PI) - it is creating the A/P for the same freight vendor code...any clue what is needed to make it create the A/P for the different Invoicing Party that we have set up?
Thanks!

Tax code error while posting Planned delivery costs in Import Scenario

Hi!!!!!
I am getting on error while posting Planned delivery costs in MIRO for Import Purchase Order with zero value tax code v0. The error is
"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN"
For Import I defined a pricing procedure which contains all condition types for CVD, Ecess, SEcess, Additional Customs Duty and Others.
While making Import PO im putting V0 tax code. I assigned the Tax Codes to the Company code.
Please let me know what config is missing.
Regards,
Durga

Is you ZAXINN assigned to the country India
and is your taxcode (created in FTXP) created for country India?
kr
hakan

Report for Planned Delivery Costs

Hi,
Is there any Report for Planned delivery costs per month/day.One of our client needs separate report for frieght charges so that he can be able to pay service tax (GTA) for the same.
Thanks
Prasad

Hai,
Did you check thro' Tcode MIR5.

Planned delivery cost for the scheduling agreement

Hi Experts
1. I have an requirement to post Invoice ver. for the Planned delivery cost (freight,customs duty,CVD etc) against the Scheduling Agreement just like Import Purchases with checking off the GR Based IV Indicator before doing the GR
I tried it but its giving me that no delivery costs are Planned in the Scheduling agreements it runs fine in case of the PO because PO is a time independent. Please inform how to post the same for schedule agreement with time dependent indicator on. I tried switching off the time dependent indicator and the system allowed, but my requirement is to Post I.V for the delivery cost with the time dependent indicator on.
Appreciate if you can suggest something in this case Urgently .
2. Aother issue is we have some uploaded Scheduling agreement from legacy system with Time dependent conditions. For this we need to post planned delivery cost in Miro. Since the system is not allowing to post, how to about for this. Shall we enter the delivery cost in unplanned delivery cost in Miro and post. Please suggest if any alternate solution is available.
Regards
Arvind

Hi,
As you know if the delivery cost document is not posted during GR the
delivery cost is not proposed during invoice (MIRO). Planned delivery
cost will be proposed in invoice only when there are records in EKBZ
table. The EKBZ table will be updated when delivery cost is posted
during GR itself.
Please ensure in the PO itself thatr the conditions have been defined
properly with the relevant amounts and values.
During GR when planned delivery cost conditions are present in PO,
system checks for values in amount field. Then only appropriate
calculations will be done for delivery cost and planned delivery cost
document will posted during GR and hence updates EKBZ table.
Solution to this issue is described in below steps,
1) reverse the invoice document
2) reverse GR document.
3) You have to give values in amount field in relevant conditions ZGDS
   in the PO.
   If you face any issues changing the values, delete above conditions
   and put it again manually and give values in amount field also.
4) Post GR once again, delivery cost document will also be posted.
   You can check it in PO history.
5) During invoice select Item + planned delivery cost and post the
   invoice. If you need planned delivery cost to be posted separately,
   then you can post individual invoice for item and delivery cost.
Please note it is not possible to post delivery costs for documents with
multiple accountassignments.
For your second question, I am afraid I can not answer. Please open a new ntry in the forum, so that someone else can answer it.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Bapi to post planned delivery cost of a purchase order

Hi every body,
         Can anybody please give me the full details of the planned delivery cost data
to post with BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
what are the manditory fields,
I am using the following code , but a few are posting , remaining r not posting
but when I post the same through MIRO it is posted what is difference
this error was came
ERROR: enter good reciept data only when working with GR-based IV
REPORT ZBAPI_MIRO                              .
tables: ekko,ekbe,ekpo,lfa1,EKBZ,t000.
data: itemdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEM occurs 0 with header line,
headerdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER occurs 0 with header line,
     return like BAPIRET2 occurs 0 with header line,
     DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
     FISC_YEAR LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-FISC_YEAR.
DATA:error_flag.
data: item_data like EK08BN occurs 0 with header line.
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
             p_order like ekpo-ebeln,
             p_item like ekpo-ebelp,
             p_ctype like konv-kschl,
             p_lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
      end of itab.
data: order(10) type N,
      vendor(10) type N.
data: begin of it_doc occurs 0,
            DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
            p_order like ekko-ebeln,
      end of it_doc.
PARAMETERS: fn LIKE rlgrap-filename OBLIGATORY.
DATA: FN1 TYPE STRING,
     l .
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR fn. "p_file.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
       EXPORTING
            field_name = 'FN'
       IMPORTING
            file_name = fn.
START-OF-SELECTION.
   FN1 = FN.
PERFORM upload.
loop at itab.
CLEAR: EKBZ,EKPO,LFA1,ITEM_DATA,HEADERDATA,itemdata.
REFRESH:itemdata,HEADERDATA,ITEM_DATA.
order = itab-p_order.
itab-p_order = order.
vendor = itab-P_lifnr.
itab-p_lifnr = vendor.
select single * from ekbz where ebeln = order
                           and ebelp = itab-p_item
                          and kschl = itab-p_ctype
                          and bewtp = 'F'.
select single * from ekpo where ebeln = order
                       and ebelp = itab-p_item.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM LFA1 WHERE LIFNR = vendor.
clear: item_data.
refresh:item_data.
call function 'ME_READ_COND_INVOICE'
   exporting
   I_BUDAT            =
    I_EBELN            = itab-p_order
    I_EBELP            = itab-p_item
   I_FRBNR            = ' '
     i_lifnr            = ' '
   I_XBLNR            = ' '
   RE_KURSF           =
   RE_WAERS           =
   I_RESWK            = ' '
   I_EKKI             = 'X'
   I_BUBIS            =
   RE_WWERT           =
   XEK08B_FLAG        =
   I_BELNR            =
   I_BUZEI            =
   I_READ_KRUEK       = ' '
   I_DISPLAY          = ' '
TABLES
    XEK08BN            = item_data
   XEK08BN_CURR       =
read table item_data with key kschl = itab-P_ctype.
headerdata-INVOICE_IND = 'X'.
headerdata-DOC_TYPE = 'KR'.
headerdata-DOC_DATE = ekbz-budat.
headerdata-PSTNG_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-REF_DOC_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-COMP_CODE = 'HPL'.
headerdata-DIFF_INV = itab-p_lifnr.
headerdata-CURRENCY_ISO = ekbz-waers.
headerdata-GROSS_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
headerdata-BLINE_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-DEL_COSTS_TAXC = 'V0'.
headerdata-PO_REF_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-bus_area = 'OTHR'.
headerdata-ITEM_TEXT = LFA1-NAME1.
*headerdata-HEADER_TXT = .
headerdata-ALLOC_NMBR = itab-P_ORDER.
APPEND HEADERDATA.
CLEAR HEADERDATA.
itemdata-INVOICE_DOC_ITEM = '00001' .
itemdata-PO_NUMBER = itab-P_ORDER.
itemdata-PO_ITEM = itab-P_ITEM.
*itemdata-REF_DOC = ekbz-belnr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_YEAR = ekbz-gjahr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_IT = itab-P_ITEM.
itemdata-TAX_CODE = 'V0'.
itemdata-ITEM_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
itemdata-QUANTITY = item_data-BPWEM - item_data-BPREM .
itemdata-PO_UNIT = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-PO_PR_UOM = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-COND_TYPE = itab-P_CTYPE.
*itemdata-ITEM_TEXT = .
append itemdata.
clear itemdata.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
    HEADERDATA       = HEADERDATA
IMPORTING
    INVOICEDOCNUMBER = DOC_NO
    FISCALYEAR       = FISC_YEAR
TABLES
    ITEMDATA         = ITEMDATA
   ACCOUNTINGDATA   = I_ACCOUNTINGDATA
   TAXDATA          = I_TAX
    RETURN           = RETURN.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
else.
loop at return.
    if not return is initial.
     clear bapi_retn_info.
     move-corresponding return to bapi_retn_info.
      if return-type = 'A' or return-type = 'E'.
        error_flag = 'X'.
      endif.
     append bapi_retn_info.
    endif.
endloop.
if error_flag = 'X'.
   message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
    rollback work.
else.
      Return Table from BAPI call is empty
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT   = 'X'
      IMPORTING
        RETURN = RETURN.
endif.
endif.
       write:/ 'Document no :', doc_no.
       it_doc-doc_no = doc_no.
       it_doc-p_order = itab-p_order.
       append it_doc.
       CLEAR IT_DOC.
endloop.
loop at it_doc.
   if it_doc-doc_no = ' '.
      write:/ 'purchase order not posted ' , it_doc-p_order.
   else.
   write:/ 'document no:' , it_doc-doc_no, 'p.order:' , it_doc-p_order.
endif.
endloop.
*&      Form upload
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
form upload .
CALL function 'GUI_UPLOAD'
exporting
    filename                      = FN1
   FILETYPE                      = 'ASC'
HAS_FIELD_SEPARATOR           = ' '
HEADER_LENGTH                 = 0
READ_BY_LINE                  = 'X'
DAT_MODE                      = ' '
CODEPAGE                      = ' '
IGNORE_CERR                   = ABAP_TRUE
REPLACEMENT                   = '#'
CHECK_BOM                     = ' '
NO_AUTH_CHECK                 = ' '
IMPORTING
FILELENGTH                    =
HEADER                        =
tables
    data_tab                      = ITAB
EXCEPTIONS
FILE_OPEN_ERROR               = 1
FILE_READ_ERROR               = 2
NO_BATCH                      = 3
GUI_REFUSE_FILETRANSFER       = 4
INVALID_TYPE                  = 5
NO_AUTHORITY                  = 6
UNKNOWN_ERROR                 = 7
BAD_DATA_FORMAT               = 8
HEADER_NOT_ALLOWED            = 9
SEPARATOR_NOT_ALLOWED         = 10
HEADER_TOO_LONG               = 11
UNKNOWN_DP_ERROR              = 12
ACCESS_DENIED                 = 13
DP_OUT_OF_MEMORY              = 14
DISK_FULL                     = 15
DP_TIMEOUT                    = 16
OTHERS                        = 17
endform.                    " upload

I think you need to implement user-exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 of enhancement MM06E005.
Look in OSS with seach term MM06E005 to get some examples.
Note310154 "ME21N/ME51N: Customer-specific check, generating error log" has some examples.
You should use the macros to set errors/warnings
Example:
mmpur_business_obj_id pt_ekpo-id.
mmpur_metafield mmmfd_partners.
mmpur_message_forced 'W' '00' '208' text-001 '' '' ''.
regards,
JG

Planned Delivery Cost in MIRO for different freight vendor

Hi,
Kindly share, how to get rid of above issue:
1) PO created with a freight condition (FRA1 with a different vendor assigned to it under item conditions tab)
2) GR done, & all accounting entries were OK, (including freight costs in FR1 or FR3)
3) while doing MIRO with selection Planned-Delivery-Cost, Amount & Qty fields are "Blank" and auto flowing from Clearing A/cs
I found this error in both Domestic or Import POs.
I've read many threads, but could not find a clear solutions for the same.
Plz help
Sankar

Hi,
Plz find screens.
Amount & Qty fields not flowing in MIRO from open GRIR/clearing account balance.

Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

Hi,
I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjan Kumar

Hi Ranjan,
The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
- PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
- PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
BR
Raf

Change the sequence of planned delivery costs in MIRO

Dear Experts,
In import an import PO the various CVD & ACD conditions are maintained in the PO .
To enter the bill of entry , MIRO is used where the invoice is booked for planned delivery costs for the PO .
In MIRO , this planned delivery costs appear by default in certain sequence. I want to change this sequence .
eg by default the system shows :
Sec Ed cess on CVD
ACD
BCD
Ed cess on BCD
CVD
Ed cess on CVD
Sec Ed Cess on BCD
I want to change the seq of appearance in MIRO.
How is it possible
Pls guide
Regards
Anis

Dear Anis bazmi
You will get the conditions as you desire one below another in PO or MIRO if you have defined them exctly the same way in your calculation schema steps, other wise there is no way in getting the way you want and it can not be changed either in PO stage or in MIRO also.
Just check, when you are processing MIRO, please select Planned delivery Costs form the menu below instead of the combination of both.
Regards

Planned Delivery Cost Settlement (MDRC)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for