Planned delivery days on contract is not executed on the PO

Hi
We have added a number of planned delivery days on each material on a contract. In my understanding the number of days added here, should be added to the delivery date on the PO (doc date + no of planned del. Days from contract).
This does not work for any PRs on PO referring to a contract.Please help me out.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi,
Use source list functionality there you can maintain validity date and valid contract with line item
And while creating PO refer this contract with line item system picks up this planned delivery date in PO calculate delivery date as per this.
Rgs

Similar Messages

  • Urgent ***  Is No. of Planned delivery days depends on FACTORY CALENDER DAY

    Hi ,
    I question for all .  Is No. of Planned delivery days calculated on <b>FACTORY CALENDER DAY or  normal difference between PO delivery and GR date .</b>
    Please let me know ,its urgent.
    Regards ,
    Amarnath Reddy.<b></b>

    Hi,
    Planned delivery period is CALENDAR days NOT Work days.
    It does not use the factory calendar and you should not even TRY to make it do so.
    Steve B

  • Planned delivery time Pickup from inforecord not material master data

    Hi,
    Currently the delivery dates of the orders are calculated with the delivery time which is marked in MM02. Since the purchasing integrates this information in the info record, we want the delivery date to be calculated with delivery time of the info record instead of calculating it with the data of MM02
    Please suggest any config.
    Thanks
    Shital D

    Hi,
    Try like this, ME21N, put the vendor, material , plant and other Org elements, hit enter, and check P.O what is the planned delivery time that you are seeing, also is the same PIR also appearing in the P.O when you scroll to the right?
    Also note.. that system might be picking 3, maybe saturday and sunday holiday is coming, check that too
    Regards
    Shailesh
    Edited by: Shailesh Rajan on Jul 7, 2011 7:00 PM

  • The VI is not executable. The full development version...

    "The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabVIEW is required to fix the errors." That is the error I've been dealing with all day. Actually it is repeated 3 to 4 times in the error message, seen when first launching the EXE. Also of note is that the run-arrow is broken. This is in an EXE that was developed well before version 2013, but I recently upgraded it to 2013 to hopefully fix some random LVRT crashes. There is obviously no issue running the code on my development machine, only once it's deployed.
    The good news is I've been able to solve the problem (mostly). My EXE now runs without the errors. I found that the problem wasn't actually in the EXE.
    We have a separate project with no files, but in the build specification we have the LabVIEW 2013 Run-Time Engine, as well as NI-VISA for serial support. We then bundle the deployment in a self-extracting RAR and it does its business. In the past this has worked just fine, but with LV2013, it seems that there is a component missing from the deployment.
    I found that if I download the Run-Time Engine directly from NI.com and run it, the only things I need to install are the Run-Time Engine, and the DEPLOYABLE LICENSE. If I do this, my EXE runs great, but with the custom installer, it is not included for some reason!
    Putting aside the fact that I don't know why the Deployable License package is needed (we aren't connecting to remote panels), I can't seem to modify my custom installer to install the Deployable License. There are versions for LabVIEW 2009 and 2011 SP1 in the Additional Installers list, but I don't see 2013.
    Can anyone explain why this is??? For now I will just distribute the 257MB Run-Time Engine and the NI-VISA installers separately I guess. But I'd really like to get back to a single, simple package to install all the prerequisites we need. HELP!

    iannicholson wrote:
    Yes, but then every installer I build will contain the runtime engine. That gets very large very quick. So I have an installer for JUST the runtime engine and VISA runtime.
    Just remove them from the "Additional Installers" tab of the Installer dialog.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

  • HT201318 I upgraded to the $20 10GB plan in Nov 2011. Storage space ran out, so I upgraded to the $40 20GB plan two days ago (July 2012). Shouldn't the original 10GB plan (which would have lasted until Nov 2012) have been pro-rated?

    I upgraded to the $20 10GB plan in Nov 2011. Storage space ran out, so I upgraded to the $40 20GB plan two days ago (July 2012). Shouldn't the original 10GB plan (which would have lasted until Nov 2012) have been pro-rated?

    My daughter has had her Razr for about 9 months now.  About two weeks ago she picked up her phone in the morning on her way to school when she noticed two cracks, both starting at the camera lens. One goes completely to the bottom and the other goes sharply to the side. She has never dropped it and me and my husband went over it with a fine tooth comb. We looked under a magnifying glass and could no find any reason for the glass to crack. Not one ding, scratch or bang. Our daughter really takes good care of her stuff, but we still wanted to make sure before we sent it in for repairs. Well we did and we got a reply from Motorola with a picture of the cracks saying this was customer abuse and that it is not covered under warranty. Even though they did not find any physical damage to back it up. Well I e-mailed them back and told them I did a little research and found pages of people having the same problems. Well I did not hear from them until I received a notice from Fed Ex that they were sending the phone back. NOT FIXED!!! I went to look up why and guess what there is no case open any more for the phone. It has been wiped clean. I put in the RMA # it comes back not found, I put in the ID #, the SN# and all comes back not found. Yet a day earlier all the info was there. I know there is a lot more people like me and all of you, but they just don't want to be bothered so they pay to have it fix, just to have it do it again. Unless they have found the problem and only fixing it on a customer pay only set up. I am furious and will not be recommending this phone to anyone. And to think I was considering this phone for my next up grade! NOT!!!!

  • I recieve the following error when running an executable ("This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors"

    I recieve the following error when trying to build and run a labview executable. I am able to build the executable but when trying to run the executable, a pop up window comes up asking the user to select a dll. (please see screen shot attached). Once the DLL is selected, I get the error that This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors. (please see screen shot attached). I have also attached a snapshot of the project window.
    I have the professional development system
    I can run the main VI
    all the required DLL's are in the dependencies section of the project window.
    I am trying to find the root cause of this error but to no avail. can anyone give me a clue to what i am missing here. Any suggestions on where i should look to find the problem ?
    Thanks in advance to all labview users for your help
    Attachments:
    project window.PNG ‏36 KB

    other PNG
    Attachments:
    Broken Arrow on EXE.PNG ‏179 KB

  • Result handler of a remote call not executed till the other remote calls get result

    I have 3 remote calls in sequence.
    Say RemoteCall1, RemoteCall2 and RemoteCall3. RemoteCall1 takes the least time say  5 seconds to get results. RemoteCall2 also 5 seconds and RemoteCall3 takes 30 seconds. But the resulthandler for RemoteCall1 does not execute till the RemoteCall3 gets results from server. Any fixes to call resulthander for RemoteCall1 as soon as it gets result without waiting for RemoteCall3 results.
    by the way I am usindg Robotlegs framework and AsyncToken.

    Don’t make remoteCall3 until you get the results from remoteCall2, etc.  That’s the only way I know to guarantee order.
    Fllash queues up all remote calls until the end of the frame and sends them all at once, although a network monitor should show that the go out in the order you made the calls.
    Similarly, Flash processes all available results at the end of a frame.  Results are asynchronous, but if all three results arrive in the same frame, they will all get deserialized.  And, the server may not be guaranteed to return results in the order requested, especially if different servers are handling the individual calls.
    I’m not sure if your time to get results is gated by server response or Flash processing the results.  I suspect it is the latter.  You also have the option of changing the resultFormat to get something that doesn’t need processing like XML and process it later.

  • Please help suggestions for solving built-only compiler error: 'The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabView is required tofix this error.'

    We have develoepd a software tool and build it on regular basis. It currently runs error free when compiled in the editor, but when we built it and run the executable stand alone we get the error.
    'The VI is not executable. The full development version of LabView is required tofix this error.' plus a broeken error.
    This menas an compiler error that is not present in the editor but in the stand alone version. We tried to identify errors as suggested in several posts in this forum, but so far unsuccesfull.
    As the editor and its compiler do not see the error  and are running fine and the stand alone version just syas 'find the error in the editor' in this case LabView is of no help.
    Can anyone suggest a sensible or 'good practice ' way of searching for the source of this error?
    Our project  comprises hundreds of Vis over several libraries.
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Thanks Craig for all your suggestions.
    We seem to have located the problem in a new vi just added to the package causing conflicts by using the same vi names as other vis already present in the package. Excluding this vi removed the error.
    It seems related to a conflict by having two vis with the same name, which was mentioned by LabView and interactively resolved when running the main vi from the editor. When successfully building the main vi the builder did not mention this conflict and reported a successful build, but when trying to run the executable it gave the cryptic error. The error caused us problems because there was no hint for the cause, just the suggestion to solve this in the editor, while at the same time in the editor the VI was running fine.
    We will post about this in detail after we have positively proven that this actually was the case.
    The .net version issue was already checked.
    Performance was the same on all machines we tested on including the dev machine.
    Debugging was tried nut did not help as the vi could not run (broken arrow). We assumed that debugging only helps in running faulty functioning vi''s. We did not check for broken arrows in sub-vis (after connecting), that could have helped, although our application has hundreds of our own vis.
    In relation to your remark: 
    'Are you using many classes? Have you verified that the proper access scopes are set for functions calling those vis?'
    Could you elaborate on setting access scopes. We were not aware of this option in LabView, although we realize this is a basic element of the underlying c code.
    Ragrds,
    Chris

  • Sales contracts could not coming into the KE24

    Hi,
    Only sales contracts(VA43) not coming ito the KE24
    But whenever we created the sales order with reference to the sales contracts then that time its appearing into the ke24
    why only sales contracts(do not having the Sales orders) not coming into the KE24
    Is it requires any config for this

    Hi
    Contaract is not standard charactor in co-pa thats y only contract it won be appear in the ke 24 report . if you are using contract with reference to sales order when you are doing the billing system it will take both sale order and coanaract fields it will update in co-pa .
    If you want to take contaract in to co-pa without sales order u have to create charactor strics dervation rule in KEDR transaction then it will update in copa .

  • Udating material master with changed planned delivery time in contract

    Hi experts ,
    My question is while we are changing the planned delivery time in the contract we need to udate the same in the material master table . so how to update the material master table with new planned delivery time. Is there any FM exits to udate it and if it is then how to use it.
    thanks
    Anshuman

    Hi Madhu ,
    You are right we can use BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA but if we use it then we have to use BAPI_COMMIT also to make sure that all the changes are saved completly and if we do BAPI_COMMIT then it maye commit all the task which is in queue and it need to update later. So it is again a issue .
    Thanks
    Anshuman

  • Maintenance Plan - Tasks are not executing in the order they were created

    I've created a new maintenance plan to perform differential backups but the tasks I created don't necessarily seem to execute in order all the time.  These are the tasks and order assigned when I created the plan using the Maintenance Plan Wizard:
    Back Up Database (Differential)
    Clean Up History
    Maintenance Clean Up Task
    Here's the deal...When it executes in the order they were created (above), all my old backups are deleted successfully.  However, there have been instances where, for example, the Maintenance Clean Up task executes before the
    Clean up History task.  When this happens, only one of my backup files is deleted successfully but not the second (I have two .bak files needing to be removed).  Furthermore, I noticed that the backup that wasn't deleted when it should
    have gets deleted at the next increment when new backups are created.
    Again, this does not happen when the tasks run in the sequence shown above.  Only one old backup gets deleted (instead of two) when one of the above item is out of sequence.  Strange behavior to say the least.
    Any feedback on this will be appreciated!

    If you do not set up precedence constraints it runs all tasks at the same time.
    Please see "8. To define a workflow between tasks:"
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh710041.aspx

  • Macro not executed in the background

    Hi all,
    I have created a macro to delete the forecast and it is working fine in the foreground, whenever i'm running it in the background, it is not getting executed, no forecast is getting deleted. In the job logs, it is giving the following message:
    "No data has been changed; data must not be save".
    I have tried with different logics for the macro, all are working fine in the foreground, coming to backgroung, nothing is working.
    Please help me out.
    Thank you
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hello Raj,
    For executing in background, you need to set up the 'DP Background' jobs. You must ensure that you define a proper Selection ID in Interactive Planning and assign this selection ID to the DP background job. If the proper selection data is not picked up by the Macro, then it may not execute. Hope you have followed that process of setting up Background DP jobs correctly.
    Also note that when you execute the Macro in background, if data has not been changed, you generally get a message saying 'data not saved'.

  • Contract price not taken in the SC

    Hi,
    We use contract management of the SRM EBP component.When creating SCs for internal Goods and service for a material on
    local contract (PCTR) we found the price picked is the valuation price maintained in the material master rather than picking up from the source(contract).
    Thanks,

    Hi
    Once the product price is imported from ECC to SRM and you maintain in product master (transaction COMMPR01), under conditions tab, the price details for the product in question, the SRM system will read locally the product price from this condition. This is the standard SRM system behaviour.
    For example, the material xxxxxx was inserted in cart xxxxxxxx. This material which has a price condition maintained in COMMPR01. So, in this case, the price will be taken from the COMMPR01 and not from the local contract. The COMMPR01 condition overwrites the local contract price, as a price is maintained under the condition tab.
    hope this information helps.

  • Data Flow Task is not executing in the package

    I have a package in which I have a Data Flow Task which will load the data from Excel file to SQL Table.
    The Data Flow Task is executing and loading the data if I execute that particular task only.
    But when I run the whole package, the data is not loading into the table. (Its not even showing in the Data Viewers also)
    FYI: On every run, the Source Excel file will be deleted and created by the previous tasks (before the Data Flow Task)
    Please give me the cause and solution for this.
    Thanks in advance.. 

    Hello Sai -
    Can you please post the structure of your package (screenshot) , unless there is a change in excel connection prior to data flow , there should be no reason for no data.
    As you mentioned the source files are deleted prior to data load , it could mean :
    1 - New files have no data
    2 - The connection of the data flow is dynamically changed to the new files.
    Happy to help! Thanks. Regards and good Wishes, Deepak. http://deepaksqlmsbusinessintelligence.blogspot.com/

  • Method BUS2012 - Release  not executing in the workflow

    hi all!
    I hope you can help me out with the following:
    I have created a workflow to release a PO. The approver will see a decision task with Approve and Decline. When he approves the PO, the workflow should release the PO in the background with the method BUS2012.RELEASE. The strange thing is when I test this method in SWO1, for my instance (my PO) and method Relase, I only have to enter the release code and I get the perfect returns (RELSTATUSNEW and RELINDICATORNEW).
    When I have this task in my testworkflow (with only the RELEASE task) it get into ERROR with the following message Release outside field of responsibility W5 105.
    I have searched within the OSS notes but nothing found, so I hope you can help me out!
    Hope to hear from you soon!
    Best regards,
    Raj

    Hi Rick,
    There is no error in the workflow... Yes the workflow is completing...
    Whenever the user Rejects the PR, the flow is not passing through the 'REJECTION_START' branch instead of that its going into the 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' branch... This is the problem i am facing...
    Why the 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' event is called instead of 'REJECTION_START'...
    Thanks,
    Srikag
    Edited by: SRIKAG on Nov 4, 2011 10:29 PM
    Edited by: SRIKAG on Nov 4, 2011 10:34 PM

Maybe you are looking for