Planned order does not schedule as per Recipe

Hello,
I am working on ECC 6.0 at client site & need your help.
The recipe with all the relationship between various phases/ operations well defined has a total production time of around 2 months.
As the client wants planned order to read recipe lead time rather than material master lead time, we are running lead time scheduling while running MRP.
However it seems that system is not reading the Recipe relationship (sequencing) between operations. Have checked the config settings & they seem fine. So in the planner order all operations are starting on same date ( instead of 1 operation after another ) & lead time in planned order is around 2-3 days. The same planned order when converted to PRocess order does read recipe lead time & schedules for 2 months as per recipe. So do not see any issue with Recipe master.
I remember that in earlier versions like R/3 4.7 at other clients, Planned order did schedule correctly.
Can you please check in your SAP system if Planned orders read Recipe correctly & schedule correctly as per lead time( when MRP runs with lead time scheduling). I am suspecting if it is a bug in ECC 6.0.
Thanks in advance. Helpful answers will be awarded.
Ram

Hi,
Cehck The scehduling formulas, and Relations ship which you are maintaining check the sequence.
In Material master SMK, and inhouse production.
These settings to be check.
Thnks and regards
E.Rambabu

Similar Messages

Planned Order Does not exist

my Stocks and requirements list shows an MRP element of DEPreq for a element data (halb part number). Double clicking on the element I see the pegged requirement part number and planned order. However. SAP says the planned order does not exist nor does the pegged requirement. I can trace upwards in stocks requirement to another part number. the Data element says DIRECT PRODUCTION. but again there is no requirement for that part nor can i get to the planned order for it either, SAP says it does not exist.
These are related part numbers which I suspect may have come from a common Bill of material; but there is no demand for the high level material but yet I have low level componenets in my Stock and requiremnts.
Is this a table inconsistency issue?
thanks in advance

Hi Borries,
Please go thru link below. This also could help enhance your knowledge in planned order.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c1/376535449a11d188fe0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5b/ae39704b8611d182ba0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
rgds,
nanthakumar

Sales order does not allow make-to-order production

Dear Friends,
I am trying to do do planned order for sales order in MD50 it was showing the error message as
"Sales order does not allow make-to-order production"
Can any one solve this
Shakthi

Hi Shakthi,
It is also possible to set the priority for Requirement Type determination like
0 Material master strategy, then item category and MRP type
1 Item Category and MRP Type
2 as 1, with check for allowed requirement type.
The transaction for this is same as "Requirement Type Determination :
Sales and Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements --> Transfer of Requirements --> Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction
Look for "Source".
In this transaction, Please, check "Requirements".
Please, make sure of the following 2 things :
1. If you do not set an indicator for maintaining the requirements class: Transfer of requirements is not carried out, irrespective of the specification you make at schedule line level for the transaction.
So it is necessary to mantain the setting first at the Requirements Class. As mentioned in my earlier posts, the requirement class for the material can be found out from Planning Strategy / MRP3 view --> Main strategy (defined in the strategy group) --> Requirement Class for Customer Requirements.
The IMG path for "Define Strategy" is Production --> Production Planning --> Demand Management --> Planned Independent Requirements --> Planning Strategy --> Define Strategy.
2. Once the "Requirements" indicator is set in Requirement Class, the requirements indicator at the Schedule Line decides whether or not you require transfer of requirments for the relevant transaction.
I hope this should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sandeep

Restrict Product Allocation if Planned order is not getting created

Hello All,
We have a scenario that when ever a Sales Order is getting created, Product allocation assignment will be done automatically and planned orders will be created for that requirement in APO.
There are some cases where in because of wrong Variant Configuration, Planned orders wont be created. Our requirement is to delete the Product Allocation automatically or to stop the product allocation assignment if the planned orders are not created.
Do we have any standard setting for doing so or Kindly suggest me some BADI's which can be used for it.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Srinivas.D

Srinivas,
A rather odd requirement.
Have you tried in SCM APO 'Maintain check instructions' to perform the product check first, then allocation? I would think that if the product check failed, then allocation would not be consulted, and no allocation therefore assigned.
IMG > APO > GATP > General Settings > Maintain check instructions
Best Regards,
DB49

Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

Hi,
Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g. based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need in 1 day , but it can not be produced in 1 day ).
what did I miss?
Thanks a lot for any information!

Hello Simona
The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
BR
Caetano

Phases/operation in process order does not exist

phases/operation in process order does not exist this error coming when cor6n is using.why?

HI
After creating Master recipe in C201, under the operations tab you need to define the operations involved in recipe . along with the operation column there is phase indicator column is there which is to be selected whether this operation is phase or not...
Check and revert
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Order does not have any selectable item .

Hi Experts ,
                          I am trying direct production scenario where I have assembly with SPK 50 and ( PT : E) . I have converted planned order for header material and automatically prod order is created for assembly also . For assembly I procured material and after MIGO ( GR ) stock is updated . But while doing Goods receipt in MB1A ( MT 261 ) for assembly production order system showed message order does not have any selectable item .
I confirmed the assembly order but stock is not reducing ( No goods issue happed for assembly ) .
I guess, in direct production we need not to do goods issue for header material ( or higher assembly ) but what about the lower most assembly ? I think we have to do goods issue for lower assembly ( that is procured raw materials ) .
Regards
Neal .

Hi Neal,
I Hope ur using collective order concept,
In a collective order, goods movements (GI & GR) are usually not required for assemblies that are directly produced.
When u do the confirmation for Lower level order, Produed assemblies will be issued to Higher level order directly, so manual goods issue not possible for   assemblies to Higher level order.
U can confirm this, with Higher level order cost analysis after the confirmation of loer level order.
So need not issue the produced assembly to higher level order using the MB1A.
Only thing u have to activate Collective order with goods movements cjech box for Order type at OPJH .
For Lower level order (Assembly order ) good issue for   procured components of assembly can be done using MB1A with MVt type 261.
I hope this will clear ur doubt if yes , Reward and close.

SAP BRIM Provider Order does not generate a Provider Contract

Hello Experts,
can anyone provide a reason why a provider order does not generate a provider contract when the Button "Submit" is clicked?
The status of the order is set to "Released" (like it should) but there is no new contract and no error message.
Thank you
Best Regards
Vanessa

Hi Vanessa,
starting point for analysis: Check the log of actions (PPF actions) on provider order header level.
The contracts are created by a standard action that is scheduled for status "released", "order modified" and no error state.
If you maintained customer transaction types/item categories -> maybe there's something missing for the copy control.
Or another common missing setting: number range for provider contracts.
Best regards
Stefan

Delete firmed planned order, pr or schedule lines

Hi All,
Do any user exit, functional module , sap notes is there to delete the firmed planned order, PR, Scheduling line
while run the MRP.
Thanks
vraj

Roll forward period
To automatically update the master plan, you can set the system so that firmed planned orders that were scheduled before the roll forward period can be deleted during the planning run. With this function, all planned orders, for which there are no longer any requirements, are deleted.
Note on roll forward period
In step "check MRP types", you can maintain the indicator "Delete out-of -date planned orders" which is used to set the system so that firmed order proposals, that lie beforethe roll forward period, are deleted in in the planning run. At the same time, new planned orders are created that are adjused to the current situation. (Or depending on the fixing type the old order proposals are displaced to the end of the planning time fence.)
Hope this suits your requirement.
Regards
Ratan

MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

Hi,
while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
Please clarity

Hi,
Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.
This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :
"Implement the program correction.
With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:
Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an
inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with
BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a
confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394
"Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
Hope this can explain the error you met.
Regards,
Mauro

Error of PO - "Purchase Order Does not exists"

Dear Experts,
Here i am facing one error of Purchase Order Creation and its further processing.
I have created purchase order and saved it, system issued message that, Purchase Order XYZ is created. (I have taken trial for 2-3 Purchase orders).
When, i am posting Goods Receipt for the PO, system is issuing the error message, Purchase Order does not exists.
Also in ME2M (PO list display) and Me23N (Display PO),
system is issuing the same message - Purchase Order Does not exists, but in PO Creation it is generating Purchase order normally.
Here is no matter of release strategy, because, PO release is not configured.
Dear Experts, Please guide me on the issue !
Thanks in advance !!!!

there can be hundred of different reason for a failure. Most common reason is a problem with the number ranges, e.g. system tries to create a record with a number that is already there.
This can happen if the number range was reset (or transported from a developement system).
But transaction SM13 gives you all the details.
There you see a line for each posting failure. Double click this line again to get more details.
There you will certainly find a line in red that indicates in which function the failure ocured.
Double click this red line to get more info. Use the buttons above to see the content of the posting. For some failures you can create a dump that gives you much more details.
Best you sit together with an ABAPer who can certainly tell you more how to read a dump and how to find the reason.

CRM service order does not create purchase requisition

Dear experts,
CRM 5.0
We have a scenario where saving a released service order should create a purchase requisition in ECC and update the document flow. I have performed the following steps and still the PR isn't getting created.
1. Configuration in CRM and ECC for integration of service processes with logistics and maintaining the purchasing document types.
2. Maintaining standard pruchase groups in ECC table V_TMW01
3. Assigning standard purchase org to the plant
4. Making sure correct RFC destination is assigned to the logical system.
Am I by any chance missing some middleware steps as saving the service order does not even trigger anything in the system?
Thanks
Ritwik

Hi Ritwik,
Just check the following activities are maintained or not
1) You have created the subscription in SMOEAC with Site , Replication object and Service Order
     Process type in the criteria value.
2) You have maintained the customizing entry in CRM in spro for the following combination in logiistics
    Integration for Trans.Type Item Cat. Service Organization Org Unit (Service) Log. Scen.
Regards
Pavan.A

Layout Options - Page Order Does Not Work Correctly

I have a Photosmart C7280 All-in-One printer. The Layout Option - Page Order does not work as expected. The User Guide (page 95) states that the default for a multiple page document is to print first page first. The manual states that to print last page first requires one to change the Page Order to "Back to Front". For my Excel, Word, Internet Explorer and PDF pages, I need to leave the Page Order as "Front to Back" if I want the last page to print first. This makes no sense. In addition, I can't get my Quicken reports to print last page first no matter what I try. Does anyone no why the Page Order does not work as expected for Excel, Word, IE and PDF, and does not work at all for Quicken?

Keisha,
If you uncheck the "show" option, then the corresponding HTML for that item is not rendered on the page. Thus, when you try to inspect that item via APEX_APPLICATION.G_F02, it simply doesn't exist.
One trick that I use when I want to have hidden items on the page, but not make them take up any space, is to concatenate them to items that will be visible.
Using your query as an example, I would re-write it like this:
SELECT APEX_ITEM.CHECKBOX(1,ROWNUM,'CHECKED')ATTENDED,
APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN(2,C.PARTY_ID)
|| APEX_ITEM.HIDDEN(3,C.PARTY_TYPE_CODE)
|| C.PARTY_TYPE_CODE PARTY_TYPE_CODE,
S.PERSON_ID,
S.PERSON_FIRST_NAME AS NAME,
C.PARTY_CASE_ID
FROM CASE.PARTY C
INNER JOIN DN.PERSON S
ON C.PARTY_ID = S.PERSON_ID
WHERE C.PARTY_CASE_ID = :P18_CDBCASE_ID
AND C.PARTY_SEQ_NO = :P18_SEQThus, the second APEX report column will contain the HTML for the hidden items PARTY_ID & PARTY_TYPE_CODE, as well as the value for PARTY_TYPE_CODE. When you submit the page, you should not encounter any issues.
Thanks,
- Scott -
http://sumnertechnologies.com/
http://spendolini.blogspot.com/

Oracle BAM Plan Monitor does not start

Hello all,
the Oracle BAM Plan Monitor does not start in when I execute the start scripts.
It tells my that the name of the service is invalid.
Is there any possibility to check on the configuration for that service name?
I have also checked on the event log of my Windows machine. There are a couple of strange entries coming from the Oracle BAM Engine:
EventEngine: ADC Context exception ADC Server exception in GetUserGroups(): 2.
ActiveDataCache: Caught exception while validating user NT-AUTORITÄT\SYSTEM: The RPC-Server is not available
Maybe someone has a clue how to resolve this issue.

Hi
Are you using a valid user name and passwd to access the plan monitor?
Did you set up a user called 'BAM' in your Enterprise Link? Normally this user will get created automaticaly while installing BAM. If it doesnt exist, you will have to create a user called BAM in EL with a blank password.
Please follow the post installation document, that is having more details.
Thanks
Laj

List of planning applications does not appear

Hello,
in EAS i create New Rule -> in Rule Editor displays in right pane -> i click on Select outline -> The Select Database Outline dialog box displays -> when i click on +planning -> nothing is displayed: the list of my planning applications does not appear !!
is this normal?
N.B : i use hyperion planning V11.1.1.3
cheers,

Did you log into the planning application first before logging into EAS, if the planning application service was recently restarted and there have been no logins to the applications then they won't appear.
As a test log out of EAS, log into one of the planning applications, log into EAS
Also be sure that the planning applications have been created to use Business Rules and not Calculation Manager if you want to use EAS.
If you are still having issues then it may be worth having a read of the following document on Oracle Support - "Troubleshooting Hyperion Business Rules Issues [ID 763345.1]"
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Planned order does not schedule as per Recipe

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for