Planned orders are not converted into process orders in ECC.

Dear All,
The issue is that Planned orders with conversion tick are not publishing in ECC as manufacturing orders. We did check the relevant master data consistency between APO and ECC and it seems fine.
We have tried to send the conversion from APO to ECC,all the orders stuck in the R1P inbound queue with error - Order no. XXXX does not exist
Message no. C/006.
Based on above message and error we found SAP Note 515740 - Inconsistencies in table CIFORDMAP for this issue.
Used the transaction SE38 and created RCFORDCH report and 'Checking inconsistencies in table CIFORDMAP'
Here it shows order series stuck in queues no longer exists.
But not sure how to reconcile the inconsistency in the CIFORDMAP table.
Would appreciate your advice.
Regards,
Sajit SIngh

Hi Sajit Singh,
Could you take some sample items struck for order conversion and check
whether active PPDS & SNP PPMs available. 
In some cases, conversion will be affected for want of PPMs.  If it is the
case with you, try generating the PPM first for that sample item and retry
converting the orders.
Could you please check and confirm this.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

  • Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

    Hi,
    Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
    Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
    Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
    What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g.  based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced  in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need  in 1 day , but it  can not be produced in 1 day   ).
    what did I miss?
    Thanks a lot for any information!

    Hello Simona
    The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
    However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
    Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
    You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
    Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
    Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
    Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Some Sales Orders are not replicating into CRM

    Hi guys,
    when I check SMQ2 in CRM,  I find that some sales orders are not replicating into CRM, then check the error, its says check SMW01..
    when I check the SMW01 it says validation error and BDOC status is F05 (information no processing). I tried to search the sales order in CRMD_Order transaction could not find the sales order...
    *Error in SMW01*
         Processing of document with Guid E01D11C71856C4F1AEBF0024E84DD0CE is canceled     CRM_ORDER
         Validation error occurred: Module CRM_DOWNLOAD_BTMBDOC_VAL, BDoc type BUS_TRANS_MSG.     SMW3
    It's not giving much clue what's the error is...
    I tried to setup a request to replicate those sales orders.. those request also end up in the same error...
    any help on this?
    thanks,
    Ken

    Hello Ken,
    When reprocessing a BDoc(via SMW01) you might need to set a flag.
    Goto trxn. SMW01. Start the debugger using command '/h' and reprocess the BDoc. After going into the debug mode press SHIFT+F7 and put a breakpoint at 2nd Tab in : class:cl_smw_flow and method 'restart_processing'. Keep debugging(F5 or F6 accordingly) until you find the requisite flag l_retry_allowed and set it as 'X'. This will allow you to reprocess the Bdoc.
    Thanks,
    Rohit

  • Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4 SNMP Traps are not converted into Alarms

    Hi everybody,
    I just configured SNMP Traps on a Cisco Catalyst 3750-x to send to our Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4 Appliance.
    Now I forced the Switch to send some traps (Power off a Power Supply, Interface errdisable). The only events I see in Alarms & Events on PI is the same information message everytime:
    Configuration management event has been recorded in ccmHistoryEventTable.
    I think the forced traps should be converted into alarms? Why can't I see them?
    Thanks,
    Marc

    Ok, I started debugging as you said. I get the following output:
    Mar 13 09:28:13.711: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 11689, errstat 0, erridx 0
     sysUpTime.0 = 198609846
     snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoSyslogMIB.2.0.1
     clogHistoryEntry.2.1688 = PM
     clogHistoryEntry.3.1688 = 5
     clogHistoryEntry.4.1688 = ERR_RECOVER
     clogHistoryEntry.5.1688 = Attempting to recover from bpduguard err-disable state on Gi1/0/13
     clogHistoryEntry.6.1688 = 198609844
    Mar 13 09:28:13.737: SNMP: Queuing packet to xx.xx.xx.xx
    Looks like the Switch is sending SNMP Traps from the ciscoSyslogMIB. Is this why PI can't show the Traps and convert it into a alarm?
    After this test I configured logging (syslog) to the PI. Now the errors are showed but still not converted into alarms. I just want to be notified by email when such errors occurs.
    Thanks,
    Marc

  • NB Type Planned orders are not Displayed in the Order Information System

    Dear All
    We have one material with Proc. type F.
    We have entered a sales order for that item & run MRP ( MRP type PE)
    No strategy is assigned to the material.
    MRP has created a Plan Order which is of NB type & in MD04 it is showing SDEB against Plan Order.
    Now we are not able to see this Plan Order in COOIS.
    Although it is visible in MD04,MD16.
    Can anyone tell me whether COOIS consider only those plan orders which are of E ( In house Prod ) category ?
    How can we display that in COOIS ?
    Abhishek Garg

    Dear,
    COOIS is used for production orders or planned orders olny and it will show u Order information relevent to "E" type procurement.
    You can use ME5A

  • Components vanish after planned order in is converted into production order

    Dear SAP gurus,
    please advise how to sort out the problem.
    After update of BOM component in R/3 (usually change of the scrap factor) we observe that the component disappears after planned order conversion to production order.
    Please advice how to track where exactly this happens.
    Unfortunatelly it does not happen for all orders, some of the orders lose the component, others do not.
    I desperately need a way to track or debug the order during conversion and CIF-ing from APO to R/3.
    As far as I know there is an user exit I could activate to force BOM explosion at conversion, but would be interested to find the reason.
    Your help and advise will be highly appreciated.
    Thank you
    BR
    Ivan

    Hi Ivan,
    In R/3 CFC2 give user name of on which the SNP planned orders are generated, RFC mode "Q", Logging "D" Debug "R".
    Then generate the Planned orders and flow them to R/3.
    Go to SMQ2 in R/3 and debug. But it will stop all the queues whichever generated on that user name.
    If you want to Debug the Production order whch is flowing from R/3 to APO, then Maintain the same parameters in APo at /SAPAPO/C4.
    I hope this will help you..
    Regards,
    Kishore Reddy

  • TLB VMI Sales orders are not publishing into ECC

    Hello All,
    I am trying to transfer the VMI Sales orders in TLB Interactive planning from SCM (7.0) to ECC (6.0)
    without any success.  I am getting the messages "You have selected 0 change pointer", "0 change
    pointers(s) processed" and "0/1 orders were transferred".
    I could process these orders and send them to ECC via /SAPAPO/CCR.  Did anyone face this
    issue and if so please let me know reason for this issue.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    Hi Senthil,
    In the interactive TLB, there is a option to send the order to the OLTP system directly.  If
    you select this on a particular order, then a change pointer is created and processed
    immediately and the order is sent across to ECC.  But that's not happening in my case.
    I know of the transaction /SAPAPO/C5 which can be used to process the change pointers
    in the background.  As I mentioned above, I am trying to process in the interact TLB and
    not in a batchmode.  Anyway, the change pointer is not created in the first place.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

  • Maintenance Plan - Tasks are not executing in the order they were created

    I've created a new maintenance plan to perform differential backups but the tasks I created don't necessarily seem to execute in order all the time.  These are the tasks and order assigned when I created the plan using the Maintenance Plan Wizard:
    Back Up Database (Differential)
    Clean Up History
    Maintenance Clean Up Task
    Here's the deal...When it executes in the order they were created (above), all my old backups are deleted successfully.  However, there have been instances where, for example, the Maintenance Clean Up task executes before the
    Clean up History task.  When this happens, only one of my backup files is deleted successfully but not the second (I have two .bak files needing to be removed).  Furthermore, I noticed that the backup that wasn't deleted when it should
    have gets deleted at the next increment when new backups are created.
    Again, this does not happen when the tasks run in the sequence shown above.  Only one old backup gets deleted (instead of two) when one of the above item is out of sequence.  Strange behavior to say the least.
    Any feedback on this will be appreciated!

    If you do not set up precedence constraints it runs all tasks at the same time.
    Please see "8. To define a workflow between tasks:"
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh710041.aspx

  • Conversion of planned order into process order not respecting F-S

    Hi Experts,
    I am working in Upgrade project from 4.6c to ECC 6 .
    I have an isuue in PPPI
    I have a process order which has to be converted to process order .
    This operation should take place by phase 210 first then phase 300 .
    But in our case the Phase 300 is starting first .
    please suggest me where to find the trouble.
    Thanks in advance

    Hello,
    I am afraid that when I enter procurement type=X & special procurement=30 in material master data, planned orders created by MRP have then a order type = NB (standard purchase order) and special produrement type = 3 (subcontracting).
    So this kind of planned orders can only be converted into purchase request and NOT into production order.
    It looks like it is not standard to do so in SAP and that I will have to manage subcontracting in prodution order; 1 routing for internal operation and 1 routing for subcontracting.
    Thanks
    Amaury

  • TS2512 i m trying to convert dpx files to mov in colour 1.5.3 but in file browser files are not seen in proper order for ex files names are 12345 it is coming as 23145 bcoz of which in output also its coming in wrong order

    i m trying to convert dpx files to mov in colour 1.5.3 but in file browser files are not seen in proper order for ex files names are 12345 it is coming as 23145 bcoz of which in output also its coming in wrong order

    1) What you downloaded should be a packed file (zip, tar.gz, etc) that needs to be unpacked into the directory of your choice.
    2) & 3) are answered by Ant's installation documentation (the page you're quoting from):
    http://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html

  • Process Orders are not getting closed-- Unsettled Variances; Balances exist

    Hello Gurus,
    We have a problem when we are trying to close process orders in Release 4.6C; We are unable to close those orders and the error messages would be variances are not settled and balances still exist.
    When we try to modify the periodic settlement in process order settlement rule it gets grayed out and wont let us do any modifications. Some body suggested that we have to make the settlement rule to FUL and then try to close but it never works. It's a problem for quite sometime, any help would be worth more than an appreciation.
    Thanks,
    Ramana

    Hi Ramana
    You need to more specific on the errors and the description of the process where you are finding the problem
    Eloborate your problem like what is the settlement type now,  whether you have done the variance calculation, what is the status of the order now (TECO, DLV etc.,)
    Make the process order in TECO or DLV, calculate the variance calculation and settle the order.
    Regards,
    Suraj

  • Changes to order are not transferred

    Hi,
    our PPDS users are facing an issue in Product Planning Table ( transaction /sapapo/ppt1).
    When we create a planned order and convert to production orders, the system converts with out any issues.
    After some time when we drag the production order to a new time ( in DS board), fix the order, then when we save, we get the message " Changes to order 100065265 are not transferred" and the order moves back to where it was... The  # 100065265 is our production order in created status.
    Looking at the error details, I thought there are some changes to the order being done in R/3, but there were no changes to that order in R/3 at that point and the same change, if done after some time goes through...
    This is happening almost for every order and it's annoying to keep click ok on this order, wait and then reprocess again...some time we get the error multiple time before the system accepts the changes...
    Any idea on what might be happening?
    More details about the error,
    ===
    Changes to order 100065265 are not transferred
    Message no. /sapapo/cdpssimulati015
    Diagnosis:
    The changes made to the order 100065265 in SAP APO can not be transferred as the order has already been changed by the linked R/3 system
    System Response:
    If you have made minor changes to an order in SAP APO and changes to this order are simultaneously being transferred from the R/3 system, only the changes from the R/3 system are adopted. The changes you made to the order manually in SAP APO are lost
    In technical information, I see the application area as /SAPAPO/SIMULATI, MESSAGE # 015 and main program SAPLSHL2.
    Thanks,K

    Hi,
    It seems the production order details are getting updated in ECC with order related settings you maintained at ECC, like settlement profile, etc., During that time, if you try to change the production order in APO, since the ECC update for the order is not yet completed, it gives the error. Thats why after sometime, when you change the production order, it allows you to change.
    Please try this, once you convert the order in APO, go to ECC and try to open the order in CO02 or CO03, it will give you an error the order is already being processed by XXXX. If so, then it is the time taking to update the production order in ECC.
    Also, try this, once you convert the order, immediately save and after sometime you change the time.
    Please check and revert.
    Regards,
    Manimaran M.

  • Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders

    Hi All,
             when i convert the planned order to production order  i got this massage popup coming  Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders . please let me know this .

    Hi,
    One of major customization steps for the order type is missing. Run OPU3 and maintain settings for the order type you are using. You may copy settings from an older type.
    Regards.

  • In my library, under the Artist column only...items are not listed in alpha order.  How can I get that to happen?

    In my library, under the Artist column only...items are not listed in alpha order.  How can I get that to happen?

    Same deal as your other thread but with Artist/Sort Artist:
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/25561674#25561674
    For more info. on how iTunes organizes things see Grouping tracks into albums.
    tt2

  • Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

    Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
    We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
    I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
    INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
    I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
    Regards,
    Pert

    Hi,
    You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
    Enhancement     CONFPI05
    EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
    INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
    Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
    Regards,
    Tejas

Maybe you are looking for

  • Urgent help need for login problem B310

    Im having a B310, i use veritouch for login purpose. My 4 years kid accidently changed the pass method without my knowledge. After restart, i cant log in. Yet after i try did the forget password in windows 7, it seems cant work. I tried windows passw

  • Why can I not receive calls on iPhone 6 ?

    I have just got my new iPhone  6 and cannot receive calls. They go straight to voicemail. I don not even receive the voicemail not receiving. called verizon and they can call me back but when i tried on another phone and Skype it @didn't work>

  • Price adjustment problem with gamers club unlocked

    I've been told i get the 20% from GCU when i do i price adjustment but i did not after giving a called to CSR earlier in the day. Basically i bought Little Big Planet 3 Day One Edition for $47.99 because that is the default price for me after GCU 20%

  • Partition is there, but Windows boot option is gone?

    Hey folks, I'm having a small issue with bootcamp. Not too long ago did I have Windows running just fine on my Mac; everything was up to date, I managed to install 7 and upgrade to 8.1 just fine. Everything was good until one evening I open my Mac up

  • Animated Flash buttons start

    Hello, hi to everybody, I'm new to the forum. I'm having the following problem. I created these buttons that should do the following screen. Be dark when the mouse is not over them. Smoothly transit to a brighter colour when the mouse get's over them