Planning 9.3 Duplicate member error: An object with the name 0000 already e

Hi All
I have 5 dimensions in my Planning applications namesly, Company, State, Product, Entity and Account
Company hase members called 0000(default) and 1000, 1001 etc
I also want add my Entity default member as 0000, but when I tried to add the memeber in my entity dimension I'm getting the Error : An object with the name 0000 already exists: Please help me to fix this
Thanks in Advance

U won`t be able to add the duplicate item name to planning application untill it would be the 9.5 version.
By the way, NotPlanning App`s nothing like as scanty - they has already an option "Allow duplicate item names" in 9.3 version..

Similar Messages

BI Platform: Parameter object with the name "URL_PARAM"... does not exist

Hi,
I'm facing this issue with only one dashboard in BI4 Platform. When trying to view it through the BI Launch Pad, I get the following error:
"Parameter object with the name "URL_PARAM" and the index "0" still does not exist in the parameter 1[...]".
I've seen this thread where a similar thing was reported with NetWeaver platform.
My client as well as server versions are Release 1.4 SP0 Patch2 (14.0.5).
Also, although some of the pictures referenced in the dashboard are not in the Public Folders on BI4. Could it be that it's not able to reference the images and hence not be displaying the whole dashboard?
Please let me know if anyone has a solution to this.
Thanks!
- Sakshi Dhakad

Hi,
So here are the versions we currently have:
SAP BO Design Studio (64 bit) - 14.1.0
SAP BO Design Studio 1.4 for BI Platform - 14.1.0.349
And on checking on Central Management Console, I get this:
SAP BO BI Platform 4.1 Support Pack 5 Patch 2
Version: 14.1.5.1568
Also, I'm not sure if I installed an add-on or the patch. Based on these versions, could you tell me how to fix the issue ?
Thanks!

Cannot backup my files / copy my files and folders due to error message " The operation can't be completed because an item with the name ".DS_Store" already exists. "

Hi Apple community!
I have a [rather worrying] problem.
When I try to copy all my files from my documents on my mac [or the entire documents folder] into an external drive, I get this error message
" The operation can’t be completed because an item with the name “.DS_Store” already exists. "
I am not given an option to skip this file or anything else.
But I simply cannot complete the operation!
I have tried deleting a few of the .ds_store files, [both in the original and in the destinations]
but no success.
The same thing keeps happening.
At first, this was just happening when I was trying to backup to my dropbox folder [the one on my mac's harddrive, which gets synced to the cloud],
but then I tried to back up my documents to my external hard drive, and I realized it is giving me the same error message.
So effectively, it seems I cannot backup my files anywhere!
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, or by corruption of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled on some models, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists"

Major headaches with copying files and folders between drives. I constantly (and I mean constantly) have to resort to copying files across in small batches (fewer than 10 works best) because anytime I try to copy lots of files and folders from my mac to an external hard drive (or from one external HD to a second external HD), I ALWAYS get the error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists".
The files and folders are all Mac-generated, so hint or trace of foreign OSs in the mix.
All file types are susceptible
the HDs are all Mac OS X formatted, no foreign file formats involved
the HDs are all journal-enabled, OS X extended formats
have looked on here for previous posts, past suggestion was to disable creation of DS_Store files - not really a solution and realistically, defeats the purpose of their creation
any ideas anyone?
would appreciate any thoughts or sugestions, this has got me beat
the context is that I have a lot of image files that I am copying (trying to...) new external 3TB drives for backup and the job appears endless if I have to do this in batches of 10 or so..!
many thanks for any suggestions

This is definitively a nuisance. When copying large amounts of files between volumes try opening a terminal window and use use ditto. You need to type the directory paths of the source and the destination volume. When it starts ditto just coupes and optionally overwrites anything on the destination. You can get a verbose mode where it lists all activities.
gunnars-mac-mini-i7:Volumes gunnar$ man ditto
NAME
     ditto -- copy directory hierarchies, create and extract archives
SYNOPSIS
     ditto [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src ... dst_directory
     ditto [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_file dst_file
     ditto -c [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src dst_archive
     ditto -x [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_archive ... dst_directory
     ditto -h | --help

Create an object with the name passed in as a string argument to a method

Hi,
I am sorry if it's too trivial for this forum , but I am stuck with the following requirements.
I have a method
void abc(String object_name, String key, String value)
method abc should first check if there exists in memory a hashmap object with the name passed in as argument object_name.
If yes ..just put the key and value there.
if not , then create the hashmap object called <object_name> and insert the key/value there.
Can anybody help me in the first step i.e, how to check if an object exists with the name passed in and if not then create it.
Will getInstance method be of any help?
Thanks in advance for your response.
-Sub-java

Dear Cotton.m,
Thanks for your suggesstion. I will remember that.
But somehow I have a strong belief that you still need to consult dictionary for exact meaning of the words like "upset" , "frustration" etc. Not knowing something in a language , that too as a beginner, does not yield frustration, but increases curiosity. And people like petes1234 are there to diminish that appetite.
To clarify above, let me compare jverd's reply to my doubt with petes1234's.
jverd said it cannot be done and suggested a work around (It was perfect and worked for me) While petes1234 , having no work in hand probably, started analysis of newbies mistakes.
jverd solved my problem by saying that it cannot be done. petes1234 acted as a worthless critic in my opinion and now joined cotton.m.
Finally, this is a java forum and I do not want to discuss human characteristics here for sure.
My apologies if I had a wrong concept or if I chose a wrong forum to ask, where people like petes1234 or Cotton.m show their geekdom by pointing out "shortfalls" rather than clearing that by perfect examples and words.
Again take it easy and Cotton.m , please do not use this forum to figure out others' frustration but be a little more focussed on solving others "Java related" problems :)
-Sub-java

SharePoint 2007 Content deployment Error: 'A folder with the name already exists.

Hi, In SharePoint 2007 one Content deployment job is failed with below error:
Content deployment job 'Remote import job for job with sourceID = some id' failed.The exception thrown was 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException' : 'A folder with the name PublishingImages/AEI-2014/Blue already exists.'
From last 3 days I am getting this error and previously this Job was running without any Error.
In Import Log file getting message: "FatalError: A folder with the name PublishingImages/sg-2015/yellow already exists."
Please tell me how to resolve the issue.

Hello,
It seems same folder exist in destination server that's why job is failing. You need to check destination server and remove the same name/GUID from site then try again.
See this technet for more info: (see "Conflicting content on source and destination" section)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd795107%28v=office.12%29.aspx
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see<br/> Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

Sybase Error 2601 Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object with unique

RE: Sybase Error 2601 Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object with unique index.
Hi Folks,
I'm getting the following error whilst executing a stored procedure in Sybase.
ERROR: Sybase Error 2601 Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object with unique index.
I understand that duplicate values have been inserted into a column that has a unique constraint.
I just can't figure out how to rectify the problem.
Your help will be greatly appreciated!
Many thanks in advance.

If the value I'm trying to insert (using update)
already exists in the unique-value field then the DB
refuses to update the field.
If the value is different it will update.Are you trying to insert or update in SQL (identified by the keyword INSERT or UPDATE respectively)?
Even in case of an UPDATE query, if you are going to update the values of some columns to violate the unique constraints, the update will not succeed and you will get the error message.
or is it?
it tries to create a new row, but can't because there
is another row with the same unique-values.
If this is the case, I am only trying to update and
not create a new item.To put it in simpler words, if you have a set of values defining the uniqueness of a record, you cannot insert another record with the same set of unique values. Similarly, you cannot update an existing record by modifying the set to conflict with another set of unique values which already exist in the database.
Suppose there are two columns A and B defining the uniqueness of the record and you have only two records at the moment like -
A B
========
1 1
2 1
If you try to insert a record with A = 1 and B = 1, it will fail because a record already exists. You cannot violate uniqueness because the database has already been told that there will be only one record for any given combination of A and B.
Similarly, if you try to update the second record from A = 2 to A = 1, the end result would be A =1 and B = 1. There is already a record with that set of values and this will result in a violation of the uniqueness. So, this update will also be disallowed. On the other hand, if you try to update B to some value, say 3, there is no problem in doing so.
For convenience, you can imagine an UPDATE operation to be equivalent to DELETE + INSERT operation, though it doesn't necessarily work the same way internally.
I hope I was clear enough.

New Local Move Request fails with error "Multiple objects with Guid hex octet string were found."

I can find nothing searching online. Trying to move the last user mailbox from one server to another, but it fails with this error. I have checked all mailboxes for the same GUID but can't locate it anywhere. Anybody have some suggestions?

Does anyone know if there is a way to perform a search based on mailbox GUID? Maybe I could find all objects with the same and it could lead me in the right direction.
Hi,
To find the object that belongs to a GUID, you can refer to this blog.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/ehlro/archive/2010/04/22/how-to-find-the-object-that-belongs-to-a-guid.aspx
Best Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Lynn-Li
TechNet Community Support

Conflict start: You tried to bind an object under the name abc.Scheduler

I have deployed my application on the WLS which is configured for clustred with 2 managed server and one admin server in the same machine. I see the below error on both of the managedServer consoles. can any one please help me resolving this issue.
<Conflict start: You tried to bind an object under the name abc.Scheduler in the JNDI tree. The object from -2433108061996587758S:192.168.0.61:[7014,7014,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:SingleDomainClusterTake2:ManagedServer1 is non-clusterable, and you have tried to bind more than once from two or more servers. Such objects can only be deployed from one server.>
Regards
Suresh.

Hi Jay,
Below is the code snippet where I am binding the Schedular Object to a JNDI abc.Schedular and I got the above error message when I trying to deploy the application in clustered environment.
Code Snippet where binding the Schedular Object
private static final String JNDI_NAME = "abc/Scheduler";
Hashtable ht=new Hashtable ();
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
scheduler = new Scheduler();
scheduler.setStorage(new DatabaseSchedulerStorage());
context.bind(JNDI_NAME, scheduler);
Code Snippet for looking up the schedular object
protected Scheduler getScheduler() throws NamingException {
if (scheduler != null) {
return scheduler;
Scheduler s=null;
if(workaround){
s=((ThreadManager)SchedulingServlet.getThreadManager()).getScheduler();
}else{
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
s = (Scheduler) context.lookup("reactor/Scheduler");
if (s.getStorage() == null) {
s.setStorage(new DatabaseSchedulerStorage());
scheduler=s;
return scheduler;
I have added "ht.put(WLContext.REPLICATE_BINDINGS, "false");" to get rid of the conflict error but I what this object to be clustrable and you please let me know how do I make this object clustrable.
I am using quartz schedular.
Regards
Suresh.

"Error intitializing communications with the LMS" in Captivate 8.0.1

After updating to 8.0.1.242 and publishing projects as SCORM 1.2 in html5, I get the error message "Error intitializing communications with the LMS" both in the LMS we use and in ScormCloud. This happens in IE 10.0.9200. I am pretty sure we have not had this message before. I had a colleague generate the same project for me using 8.00.145 and I get no error message. Any input on what causes this would be appreciated.

Can you share your project on id: [email protected]
we will try to investigate this at our end. Also please send the exact steps how you are able to get this error.
Regards
Shriyansh
Adobe Engineering Team

Web Matrix FTP Remote Connection Error - "Connection Error - Failure to get file list from server. An entry with the same key already exists."

Does anyone have experience with this issue when connecting to a Linux FTP Web Server running a FTP Site?
"Connection Error - Failure to get file list from server. An entry with the same key already exists."
I cannot access the root directory of the ftp file server using Web Matrix 3. The site is .php based, and
is accessible when connecting with FileZilla or Remote Connecting via FTP with Visual Studio.
All sites have been deleted from Web Matrix, the user Application Data has been cleared and Web Matrix has been reinstalled.
Issue Persists....
Thanks in advance,
Justin

Turns out that the program leaves metadata in your app data folder that is not removed upon uninstallation of the software.
This is incorporated to communicate with a file that uploaded into the ftp directory when publishing pages.

RE: multiple named objects with the same name andinterface

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

I am not able to open iCloud from pc, error is "problem with the server". what should I do?

I am not able to open iCloud from pc, error is "problem with the server". what should I do?

Go to Settings>General>Restrictions>Accounts (near the bottom) and set this to Allow Changes. You will then be able to access Settings>iCloud again.

Have published iweb site for five years with no problems and just opened a new site and get - 404: Page not found This error is generated when there was no web page with the name you specified at the web site.-is the problem with iweb or with hosting? T

I am sorry if thie is republished-My first time doing this and I am not sure what goes where and where to hear feedback.
Have published iweb site for five years with no problems and just opened a new site and get -
404: Page not found
This error is generated when there was no web page with the name you specified at the web site.-
Troubleshooting suggestions:
Ensure the page you are linking to exists in the correct folder.
Check your file name for case sensitivity . Index.htm is not the same as index.htm!
Temporarily disable any rewrite rules by renaming your .htaccess file if it exists
is the problem with
iweb or with hosting?
One Apple tech started to fix Iweb and had to end session and the next said problem with hosting at Network Solutions as it published
to local folder. NWS has checked sttting a few times-
Any help would be extremely appreciated as trying to fix this for about five weeks
Thanks VG
<Email Edited by Host>

It's a really bad idea to post your email address - it's an invitation to spam - and I've asked the Hosts to remove it. (Even though I've now noticed you mis-spelled it! - anyway, never post your address in a forum.)
You have a site here: http://virginiagordon.com/www.virginiagordon.com/WELCOME.html
If that's not the page you are having trouble with, what is that page's URL?

I am trying to delete duplicate content in my iTunes library. I have stopped the download and I can see them on VIEW Displaying Duplicates, but cannot delete them with the Delete button. Can anyone assist?

I am trying to delete duplicate content in my iTunes library. I have stopped the download and I can see them on VIEW>Displaying Duplicates, but cannot delete them with the Delete button. Can anyone assist?

If you've paused the download (they are partially greyed out on the duplicates screen ?) then you will need to delete them from download window, you can't (as far as I know) delete partially downloaded items from that screen. When you have items downloading, or downloads that are paused, you should have a downward pointing arrow at the top right of the iTunes screen
If you click that arrow you should get a popup window with the items that are downloading/paused - and you should be able to select and delete them (or resume their download) from there.

Planning 9.3 Duplicate member error: An object with the name 0000 already e

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for