Planning / Budgeting at General Ledger Level.

Hi All,
I want to have your valuable inputs.
We want to generate one report. It is sort of variance report of planning and actual. But client want to maintain planning at General Ledger Account Level. Is it possible maintain?
Reply immediately.
yours

Hi
See if this helps you
Tcode OBP6 - Activare Integrated planning
Tcoed GCDH - Review Integrated planning
Tcode OBPL - Transfer planning data from CO
Tcode KE1W - Transfer planning data from CO-PA
pushkaraj

Similar Messages

CO Document Transfer: Planning Data to General Ledger

Hi,
I have run kp06 for cost center planning.
Subsequently when i was transferring the planning data to General Ledger system is not creating any documents. could some one through light on this
regards
AV

hi,
I hv run the fagl_co_plan.
The message as follows.
Log: CO Document Transfer: Planning Data to General Ledger
Processing type                        Test run
Date                                   21.07.2010
Time                                   19:45:54
Check for rcrds                        Yes
No. of documents not posted                     0
No. of docs posted with messages                0
No. of docs posted correctly                    0
regards
vs

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger

Hello Guys,
We are planning to implement
General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger
0FI_GL_14
We are in ECC6 sap_appl 6.00 and BI 7.0 SP 14, BI Content 7.3 level 4.0
The new GL line item is available
Financial Accounting: General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL)
Available as of Release - SAP Enhancement Package 3 for SAP ERP 6.0
Shipment - SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08
Content Versions- 1.0; 703
Just we have to install SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08 and on ECC side SAP Enhancement package 3 for ERP 6.0 --. Financial accounting - SAP APPL 603.
Is it correct. Can you please confirm.
Thanks
Senthil

Hello Senthil,
Yes, thats engough, since SAP is recommending the same for that datasource 0FI_GL_14. I think you are already in that version.
See this SAP help document
[DataSource Transactional Data: 0FI_GL_14|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/45/4f8e8bbf3f4f63a5dd197ef7d53fa2/content.htm]
Thanks
Chandran

General Ledger Budget Extractor

Hi,
Is there a BC extractor for extracting General Ledger budget data?
I looked at help.sap.com and I couldnt find any thing.
Thanks,
Ravi.

There isn't any standard extractors for planned (budgeted) General Ledger values, per se. If these budgeted values are posted as accruals, to future Fiscal Year/Periods, to the General Ledger in your R3/ECC source environment, the standard content DataSources for General Ledger will pickup that data.
If the General Ledger budgeted values aren't being posted as accruals to future Fiscal Year/Periods, then where are they being posted to in your source R3/ECC environment?

General ledger account planning

Hi SAP Guru's
Can any body please hlep me out for General ledger accounting planning?
What is general ledger planning accounting?
Can any body explain with step by step configuration for the same?
Thank in advance
Amar

Hi,
Planning at GL level is possible from ECC 6.0
Check the link [GL Planning|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/87/231ffdb4e9494ea529a99c23aa2a56/content.htm]
The config steps are very simple and is integrated with Microsoft Excel.
It is very handy and user friendly.
Regards,
Sridevi

Problem with General Ledger Budget Load

Hi All,
We are experiencing an issue wherein the Budget figures for general ledger are incorrect in the cube. The data-flow is 0FI_GL_10 to DSO (daily delta) to Cube (daily delta). There is a singular DSO and Cube for Actuals and Budgets. The figures in the DSO tally with R3. The delta from the DSO to the Cube is using Active Data Table of the DSO using DTP. The contents of the cube are exactly similar to those of Active Data Table i.e the new and old records both reach the cube and hence the inconsistency. I tried to do a selective deletion for a particular fiscal period from the cube and then doing a full update using both the Active Data and Change Log tables but the results are still the same. All key figures u2013 0BALANCE, 0DEBIT and 0CREDIT look affected. My questions are u2013
Is using Active Data Table rather than Change Logs for delta the reason behind this ?
Why is it only the Budget that is affected, Actuals and other versions look fine.
Do we need a different data-flow (like a daily delete and load into a separate cube) for Budgets ? Does SAP suggest something specifically for Budget loads.
Why does selective deletion for a particular fiscal period not working, do I need to do it for the entire fiscal year ?
Your expert opinion on this is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Saurabh Diwakar
Edited by: Saurabh Diwakar on Sep 19, 2010 10:57 AM

HI ,
may be you can take a look at the following SAP notes , it might help
Note 1002272 - NewGL-DataSource 0FI_GL_10, 3FI_GL_*: Records missing in BI
Regards,
Sathya

Levels in the General Ledger

Why are there 5 levels in the in the European G/L and only 4 in the U.S. version and can you tell me what the differences are?

Hi, Steven
Do you mean level of Chart of Accounts instead of General Ledger in B1? Because I cannot find such different in General Ledger. But in Chart of Accounts, U.S.A Demo has 5 levels and U.K demo has 4 levels.
The reason why B1 designed like this is because this accords with accounting rules or business practice of USA locan and UK local. As what I know, the account setup rules in USA and UK are totally different. B1 would accord with local request. For more details of accounting rules, please consult with account experts.

General Ledger Planning

Dear All,
I need to do the General Ledger Planning in ecc6.0 , can anyone able to Give me the config material or user manual to do the GL planning.
Thanks & Regards

Hi
Go through the below link:
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/FIGLMD/FIGLMD.pdf
VVR

Could APEX be used for development of a General Ledger system?

Hi All,
I am interested in developing a "light" web-based erp system for small sized companies for a vertical market. This system should be composed of General Ledger, Inventory & Payables functional areas. I just want to know if APEX could be used for developing applications of this kind. Do you believe that APEX is a mature platform in order ro be useful for development of complex applications? I'm very impressed by this platform but I do not have the necessary experience in order to decide if I could use APEX for more complex and demanding apps.
Thank you very much,
George Papageorgiou

Technically speaking Apex can handle anything other frameworks..etc can do. I think your target market will determine whether Apex is the correct choice or not.
Larger companies will want to go with an established ERP system like Oracle Financials, SAP, Costpoint..etc. So if you are aiming at a mid to small sized company, they may have a much smaller budget for such a system. If you are planning to make it a SAAS and host the solution yourself, I think Apex would be a good fit. If you are planning on selling the software for a local installation at the customer site, it may not be the best fit due to its coupling with the Oracle database. Personally I wouldn't want to put my entire financial set of data on someone else's server, but thats just me.
In my own opinion, a good ERP or 3rd party COTS product does not dictate to you which database you need to use, but instead supports multiple. Apex lives inside the Oracle database, so your customers have to run Oracle. For larger shops, it is not an issue, but for smaller shops, they may want to use mysql or something similar. Now people here will say "But Oracle XE is free!". This is true, but it is also almost 6 years old, completely unsupported by Oracle, and not patched. So I wouldn't stake my entire success on it.
So again it really will depend who you are going after, whether you will host the solution, and whether you think the cost/skill level of Oracle will be a barrier to your customers.

Load of EBS Supply Chain data deletes data for General Ledger

Hi,
we are trying to load data from EBS 11.5.10 to BIAPPS 7.9.6. We have loaded data to Financials Subject Areas (Budget, Financials - COGS, Financials - General Ledger, Financials - Payables, Financials - Receivables) using pre-defined execution plan Financials_Oracle 11.5.10 and data has been successfuly loaded and shown on dashboards.
Later we have loaded data into Supply Chain Subject Areas (Employee Expenses, Financials - Payables, Supply Chain - AP Invoices, Supply Chain - Purchase Cycle Lines, Supply Chain - Purchase Order, Purchase Receipt, Purchase Requisitions) using pre-defined execution plan Procurement and Spend: Oracle 11.5.10. After this load data are visible on Procurement and Spend dashboards but previously loaded data on Financials - General Ledger dashboards are missing.
So we have loaded data to Financials again which brought Financials data back to dashboards but data for Procurement and spend disappeared.
We have also trying to load all data using Complete Oracle 11.5.10 execution plan. After this load most of the dashboards for Financials and Procurement and spend are empty.
And finally we have created our own execution plans for Financials, Supply Chain and both and tried the same scenario. The results are the same. It seems to me that load of Financials data deletes Supply Chain data and vice versa.
Can somebody advice how to load data for Financials and Supply Chain together?
Thanks a lot, Petr
Edited by: user793851 on Oct 23, 2009 11:02 AM
I have to add new info: the all data are back and visible after the night. We didn't perform any actions. Does anybody know about some settings which can cause such behaviour?
Many thanks,
Petr

Try the BI Apps forum: Business Intelligence Applications

Plan/Budget data posting back to GL

Hello, the forecast/budget data that gets created in BPC, does it need to be exported and posted back to FI GL(or whatever other software they are using for their day to day general ledger)? thanks.

Hi Zack,
Please go through the guide on [How To Retract Data from BPC 7.5 NW to SAP ERP Cost Center|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c029accf-6d95-2d10-79aa-cc291180bf73?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&48842368318534]. You will first create the Plans and Budgets using the Planning Application in BPC and then the data will be retracted or transferred to ERP Cost Center.
Regards,
Raghu

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items 0FIGL_O14 Performace issue

Dear Forum,
We are facing a performance issue while loading the data to 0FIGL_O14 General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
Please see my requirement below for updating the data to 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
This report is generated to display Dry Dock and Running Repair expenses for the particular Purchase orders with respective G/L's.
1) The G/L DSO will provide us the 0DEBIT_LC and    0DEB_CRE_DC Foreign currency amount with signs (+/-) amounts and.
2) ZMMPRC01 Cube   will provide us the 0ORDER_VALUE (Purchse order value)and    0INVCD_AMNT Invoice amount.
While we are loading the data from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO ,we have created nearly 19 InfoObject level routine to derive the below mentioned fields data for MM Purchase Order related records.
0CHRT_ACCTS    Chart of accounts
0ITEM_NUM      Number of line item within accounting documen
0AC_DOC_NO     Accounting document number
0GL_ACCOUNT    G/L Account
0COMP_CODE     Company code
0COSTCENTER    Cost Center
0CO_AREA       Controlling area
0COSTELMNT     Cost Element
0SEGMENT       Segment for Segmental Reporting
0BUS_AREA      Business area
0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
0AC_DOC_NR     Document Number (General Ledger View)
0AC_DOC_TYP    Document type
0POST_KEY      Posting key
0PSTNG_DATE    Posting date in the document
0DOC_CURRCY    Document currency
0LOC_CURTP2    Currency Type of Second Local Currency
0CALQUART1     Quarter
0CALYEAR       Calendar year
For reference Please see the below logic to derive the data for PO related record.
DATA:
      MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
$$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
    ... "insert your code here
    types : begin of ty_FIGL,
                CHRT_ACCTS type /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS,
                ITEM_NUM type /BI0/OIITEM_NUM,
                AC_DOC_NO type /BI0/OIAC_DOC_NO,
                GL_ACCOUNT type /BI0/OIGL_ACCOUNT,
            end of ty_FIGL.
    data :it_figl type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_figl,
          wa_figl type ty_figl.
    SELECT single CHRT_ACCTS
                    ITEM_NUM
                    AC_DOC_NO
                    GL_ACCOUNT from /BI0/AFIGL_O1400
                      into wa_figl
                      where DOC_NUM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_NUM and
                            DOC_ITEM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_ITEM and
                            /BIC/Z_PCODE = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_PCODE
                            and
                            /BIC/Z_VOY_NO = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_VOY_NO
                            and
                            FISCYEAR = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCYEAR.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      RESULT = wa_figl-AC_DOC_NO.
    ENDIF.
    clear wa_figl.
Please note the same kind of logic is applied for all the above mentioned fields.
Here is my concerns and issue.
For the all above all routines i am referring BI0/AFIGL_O1400
DSO and finally loading to the Same DSO(BI0/AFIGL_O1400
The worried part is my DSO 0FIGL_O1400 is currecnly having nearly 60 Lacks records and MM cube is having nearly 55 requests which are required to update to the Above DSO for PO related PO value and Invoice amount.
The big issue here is while uploading data from MM cube to DSO say for example if the request is having 25,000 records from this nearly 500-600 records will be updated to DSO.
But here it is taking huge time ( nearly 3 days for request ) for updating these records , like this i have to pull 50 more requests from Cube to DSO as per the requirement.
Please note as of now i haven't created any indexes on DSO to improve this loads.
Please note am facing this issue in Production environment and need your help ASAP.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas Padugula

Hi,
If selecting data from 0FIGL_O14 is taking long time then you can create secondary indexes on DSO.
0FIGL_O14 would be huge as data volume directly corresponds to data volume in BSEG.
But for you requirement, I think what you can do is,
1. create multiprovider on top of DSO and Cube and create Bex report to give you the fields requried from both the infoproviders, you can then use open hub or APD approach to keep the data in the staging table or direct update DSO and then load the data to the DSO
2. Create secondary indexes on DSO so that fetching would be faster.
3. Do the enhancment at R/3 level to fetch fields from MM during load of G/L
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.

FAGLGA35 - Actual Distribution in New General Ledger accounting

Dears,
In transaction FAGLGA35, system gives below mentioned messages :-
i) No valid sender entries were found. Message no. GA710.
Diagnosis
The system did not find a valid sender for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL. The problem can be due to the following reasons:
Master data checking for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL, found no valid senders for this segment.
The senders are valid from a master data standpoint, but the system found no posted values or quantities in the database corresponding to your selection criteria. The sender and the segment will be processed only if the cycle works iteratively and at least one sender in another segment receives values which it can then allocate iteratively.
In cycles for indirect activity allocation, this message appears if segment AWL is to allocate posted sender activity quantities but the sender has been completely scheduled. Complete scheduling of posted activity quantities occurs, for example, if you use cycle AWL in a test run but already used it in a current real processing run in the system.
System Response
The system cannot process the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of segment AWL in cycle 0LZAWL. In particular, check the validity of the sender master data for the settlement period.
To do so in cycle maintenance, choose "Formal check".
If segment AWL allocates posted values or quantities, the senders in the segment are valid only if:
The sender holds actually posted values/quantities not equal to 0
The cycle is iterative, and the sender receives values in another segment which it can then allocate iteratively.
If necessary, you must set the iteration indicator in cycle 0LZAWL.
In a cycle for indirect activity allocation, check whether the cycle is currently in use for posting in the system sender in segment AWL and thus completely schedules the senders in segment AWL.
If this is the case, cancel the cycle and repeat the cycle execution.
As per message solution, i do all the things but the same message comes.
ii) Cycle 0LZAWL, start date 20080401, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LZAWL, starting date 20080401.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Is anybody have any solution. Please suggest it.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah

s_alr_87012168 : Customer Aging Report (Due Date Analysis for Open Items) this is a report generated.

Posting of CarryForward New general ledger

Hi financial wizards,
our client uses new general ledger. The accounting block has been extended with some ZZ user fields carrying results determined via substitution exits during posting.
The additional customer fields are added to the accounting block and are stored on item level (BSEG) as on aggregate level (FAGLFLEXT).
After the run of transaction FAGLGVTR - 'Balance Carryforward (New)' we have the correct values in the carryforward column of the target account, but values from customer fields are not transfered.
SAP will not help us with a note at this time; the features may be integrated in a later release.
Now my question: How to post the carryforward values manually or by program? I know the SAP Carryforward does not create any documents but after the run the Carryforward period (period 0 in former times) is filled with the sums of previous years P+L accounts. Carryforward works correct i.E. for profit center but not for the additional clients fields.
We need some good ideas as how to overcome this obstacle.
Regards,
Clemens

Dear Peter,
I am afraid that you are mistaken. There is lot of difference between the New GL Accounting and COPA. They are entirely different and its utility is also different.
Here in New Gl, Characteristics means, segment characteristics, for example, business area, profit center, functional area, segment.
Trust this answers your query!
Cheers,
Ashok SINGH

Budget Control at top level WBS only

Hello All,
I have a requirement from client where I need to activate the Budget control (90% warning and 100% error). I have done the setting accordingly.
Now the scenario is such that when client is doing budgeting, they are allocating the budget only at top level WBS (they have a different legacy, where they are doing there detail planning n budgeting, but since they want the feature of budget control in PS, they will do minimal budgeting in PS). As per my settings when I budget top level WBS and save the availabity control is activated (with no budget on lower level WBS). Now when I try to do some postings/or assign that WBS to PO, even with a value of 1 USD, i am getting an error of budget exceeded, which is fine as per the settings as that WBS is having 0 budget.
The requirement from client side is such that they want AVAC to be activated only at top WBS and do postings to lower WBS. But if the total of lower WBS exceed the budget of top WBS, they should get an warning or error. For example:
WBS level BUDGET ACTUALS
1               100
2                              50
2                              50
so as soon as the actuals touch 100, the system should give an error/warning. Note that the 2nd level WBS are not budgeted in SAP, so budget is 0 on them.
I have 2 questions:
1.Is it possible to activate AVAC only for top WBS ?(without any enhancement/development)
2.How the AVAC will work, if the total of 2nd level WBS exceeds the budget of top WBS (as explained in example above)?
Awating your replies.
Thanks
Sarang

Thanks Virendra, it was useful.
I tried other way round also i.e. by not marking the release tab in OPS9 and activating AVAC in CJ30.It works in that way too.
For my other question, regarding activating AVAC only at top level, we can achiebve that by using transaction control in user status.
Thanks
Sarang

Planning / Budgeting at General Ledger Level.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for