Planning run issue

Good morning,
I am planning a product in a sim version in APO, if I do a regen planning run it works but if I run the same scenario (and reset the results) with a net change it is not included (not planned) in the planning run.
Am I missing something obvious??
Thanks in advance.

Hi Prasad,
Planning run can be performed both with netchange as well as with
regenerative mode.
Every time, when planning relevant changes are done in system, system
automatically sets up planning file entry for the location product
combination.
If you select net change method, only those items with plannning file
entries will be planned in planning run.
If you select regen mode, the entire sequence will be replanned
irrespective of planning file entries.
Again, the selection of net change or regen mode is purely depends
upon the client/business depending upon the requirement.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

End Planning Run After Order Selection - issue not clearing down all plans

Hi,
We are using the CTM Profile with "End Planning Run After Order Selection" ticked in the basic settings tab in order to clear down previous CTM runs. So we have a CTM deletion profile.
The issue is that it requires more than one execution to clear down the Planned Orders / Purchase Requisitions. You execute the Deletion CTM Profile once and it will clear down some of the Purchase Requisitions and Planned Orders and leave some still in place. You then have to execute the deletion CTM profile one or two more times in order to delete the remaining Planned Orders / Purchase Requisitions.
This is clearly not realiable for a batch process to clear down plans. Has anyone else experienced this and does anyone have a solution. The solution cannot be based on RLCDELETE or /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER
Mark

Hi,
Can you check your planning mode and deletion mode combination defined in the ctm profile.
Prerequisties for deleting the orders:
u2022 They are within the planning and deletion periods
u2022 They do not have pegging relationships with demands outside of the planning period
They lie outside of the production horizon, stock transfer horizon and the planned delivery time
In addition, all location products of an order must be included in the Master Data Selection so that CTM can
delete the order. Also, CTM cannot delete any manually fixed orders.
If you have selected the SNP Order order type in the CTM profile, CTM cannot delete any PP/DS orders. This
restriction is also valid the other way round for the PP/DS Order order type. If you select this order type, CTM also
deletes SNP orders.
Thanks,
nandha

SNP Optimiser issue (Annual Planning Run)

Dear Friends,
My fiscal year is 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011, Now I am trying to run Annual planning run for the current FY.
After the run, If i see in SNPOPLOG, all demand is showing as unfulfilled. If i run for the next FY it is planning.
I want to run for the current FY, what settings I need to do?
sree

What is the time bucket profile of data view in which u are running optimizer. If it is a single yearly bucket you cannot run optimizer in current year. (your first bucket cannot have the start date in past)
Choose 12 monthly buckets. and run planning. You may 'view' the planning results in single annual bucket.
even if you do this, there will be no plan in current month. system will plan from next month onwards.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Thatte on Apr 13, 2010 6:01 PM

Error occurred during CTM planning run

Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Khadar

Hi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Error - Background Processing: Planning Run

Hey Guys,
I want to schedule a background planning run. The report /SCMTMS/CL_TS_VSR_BGD is terminated
because of the following error. Has anyone an idea how to solve this issue?
Kind reagards,
Christian
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "/SCMTMS/VSR_OPT_BGD" had to be terminated because it
has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
The following syntax error occurred in program
"/SCMTMS/CL_TS_VSR_BGD=========CP " in include
"/SCMTMS/CL_TS_VSR_BGD=========CI " in
line 42:
"Direct access to the components of the global interface /SCMTMS/IF_SRV"
"MGR_TYPES is not allowed (INTERFACE /SCMTMS/IF_SRVMGR_TYPES LOAD state"
"ment is missing)."
The include has been created and last changed by:
Created by: "SAP "
Last changed by: "SANNG "
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "/SCMTMS/VSR_OPT_BGD" had to be terminated because it
has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.

Can you refer the following SAP Notes will help you to resolve your problem.
1230638 Memory consumption for VSR planning run too high
1285772 Planning: Write application log from VSR batch reports
1279704 Planning: Various performance improvements

Error Mrp: Total Planning Run stopped due to 25 Terminations of 202 Matls

Hi
We are trying to run the Mrp Job I.e steps (RMMRP00) with variant PLVH_NETCHNG)..
I have 1 db server and 2 apps servers and it the starts to run for about 2 minutes and then crashes with the ffg error:
Total Planning Run stopped due to 25 Terminations (dumps)of 202 Matls.
Apps Guys says its a basis issue and i cant see an issue.
ANy help will be appreciated

Hi,
Please check the MRP setting some times we define mrp value upto 3-4 decimal and our setting upto 2 decimal points. If you send error log then that will be helpful for us to see the exact problem in the dump.
In case you want to send this by mail send [email protected]
Regards,
Anil

Launch ASCP plan run very long time

Hi,
I launched constrained ASCP plan and it took very long time. I launch ASCP plan in friday and it still not finished yet till monday, Memory Based Shapshot & Snapshot Delete Worker are still running, Loader Worker With Direct Load Option is still in pending phase. MSC: Share Plan Partitions has been set to Yes.
When I run query below :
select table_name,
       partition_name
from   all_tab_partitions
where table_name like 'MSC_NET_RES_INST%'
OR     table_name like 'MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS%'
order by substr(partition_name,instr(partition_name,'_',-1,1)+1);
The results are:
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_0
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_0
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_1
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_999999
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_999999
Please help me how to increase the performance when launching the plan. Is change MSC: Share Plan Partitions to No the only way to increase the performance in running plan?
Thanks & Regards,
Yolanda

Hi Yolanda,
a) So does it means that plan was working fine earlier but you are facing this issue recently.. ? If so then what you have changed at server side or have you applied any recent patches.. ?
b) If you have not completed plan for single time,
I will suggest that run data collection in complete refresh mode for one organization which is having relatively small data. Further, you can modify plan options in order to reduce planning calculation load like
- disable pegging
- remove any demand schedule / supply schedule / global forecast etc
- enable only single organization which having relatively small demand and supply picture
- disable forecast spread
Once one plan run will be completed, then expand your collection scope to other organizations and also enabling above mentioned setting.
There are lots of points need to consider for performance issue like server configuration, hardware configuration, num of demands etc. So you can raise SR in parallel while working on above points.
Thanks,
D

Planning Run - Enhanced Backward Scheduling Error

Hi SAP Expert,
I encountered planning run error "Heuristic terminated due to a possible endless loop" after I run the planning run via transaction /SAPAPO/CDPSB0 - Production Planning Run with heuristic "Enhanced Backward Scheduling".
Do anyone have any idea on it?
Thanks.
Regards,
Hooi Chia

Hi All,
This issue had been resolved. I'm now close this issue.
Regards,
Hooi Chia

Planning run for make to order strategy

Hi,
I am trying to run the complete planning cycle for strategy group 20. But i am unable to do so. Can u please give me a detailed description on the same.
P.S. I did the planning run for strategy group 10, that is , making a plan and converting to active plan etc.
But unable to run for strategy group 20.
Please look into the same.
Br,
Geetu

Hi Geetu
Make to Order Means :
Produce/ Procure the material for this Sales Order (----
Strategy Means :
Effe. procedure/plan to execute Requ.
Advantages of Make to Order :
Reduce the Inventory
Reduce the Cost
Flexible to Customer Requirements
MAKE to ORDER STRATEGY 20
(Pure make to Order)
===============================================================================
u2022     Production & purchase are triggered by Sales order receipt
u2022     System will not perform net requirement calculation between individual sales orders
u2022     Produced quantities canu2019t be switched between one sales order to other
u2022     System creates individual planned orders against each sales order recd. With ref
u2022     Individual & collective requirement indicator controls the level up to which MTO is applicable
u2022     Goods Issue against the sales order reduces the requirement
u2022     System manages the production & procurement costs specifically for each sales order in settlement order
u2022     Lot for lot order qty, is the default lot size followed in MTO, irrespective of the settings in MRP1
==================================================================================
Create a material(MM01) with Strategy Group :20 ( MRP3)
You can check & confirm all those properties by creating a Sales Order (VA01)
See the effect of it after running the MRP ( MD02),
Check the Results in Stock Requirement List ( MD04)
Also, check the stock level of the same material before the Sales Order &
after the Sales Order
If possible, Create One more Sales Order &
see how the quantities of the individual sales Orders are managed.
You can verify all the prosperities of Make to Order (Strategy :20) by yourself
Hope this may Help
BRSR

How to take planning run for selected materials?

We have some 50 materials for which only i want to take planning run.I try to use MRP area but it it creating problem at the time of delivery of materials.Please suggeset solution.

Hey,
you can resolve this issue by creating a separate MRP controller for these materials and configure the user exit key for this MRP controller at MD01. (just press F4 at user exit key and select the maintain values option) such that materials for only these MRP controller are planned.
This however, has a drawback, ONLY materials whose MRP controller is selected would be planned:
Eg;
if Parent material A has two child materials in it Y and Z.
if you assign A the MRP controller 001 <~~ and
Y and Z have some other MRP controller, the dependent requirements generated from A would not be planned on Y & Z,
So, if you want the planning to take place at all BOM levels for these materials you can place the same MRP controller for all materials which you want to plan separately.
Hope this solves your issue.

How to exclude Sales Orders from a planning run

Hi,
I run MD02 and i discover that planned orders are being created as procurement proposals for sales orders and the planned independent requirement.
I want planned order to be created only for the Planned independent requirements ONLY.
Is there a way that sales orders can be excluded from the planning run?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

Dear,
Check the requirement type of your sales order line item in VA02 procurement tab it should be Reqmt type of customer reqmt   KSL
Also check the strategy assign in material master and MRP group OPPR and then check the setting of strategy 10 in OPPS there should be
Customer Requirement planning
Reqmt type of customer reqmt   KSL Sale frm stck w/o ind.req.red.
Requirements class 030 Sale from stock
Allocation indicat.     No consumption with customer requirements
No MRP   :-               1 Requirement not planned, but display.
Please try and come back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Safety stock not covered by schedule lines in planning run

Hi !
In our organization we are trying to implement scheduling agreements and automatic creation of delivery schedule lines through MRP. We have MRP type PD and it considers the reservations created by PM orders and Production orders as requirement elements. When I do the planning run, it creates schedule lines for the PM order reservations and purchase requisition for safety stock. I need it to create schedule lines for all scenarios. Kindly help and suggest a solution.
Regards,
Satya

Hi,
Please refer the below links.
Schedule Lines not getting created in MRP
Re: No Scheduling line is generated when RUN MRP
Hope it helps you.
Thanks.

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to purchase and use on my work ipad?

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to use on my work ipad?

Yes, otherwise you will have to pay for those apps again. If an app is purchased by one Apple ID, he/she will be able to redownload it again for no cost (note: this does apply to songs, but NOT to movies).

New planned goods issue date during delivery creation due to changed route

Hello All,
I have defined 2 routes with different values for transit time and transporation lead times. I have configured routes such that in order creation - route A is determined and while delivery creation due to weight group - delivery B is determined.
Now for Route A i have maintained transit time of 3 days and Transportation lead time of 4 days and for Route B it is 1 day each.
Delivery scheduling is active for the order type.
Now when i create the order with a delivery date of say 05/24/2010 then (route A with transit time of 3 days) is determined and the planned goods issue date of 05/21/2010 is in the order.
Now while creating delivery (Route B which has transit time 1 day) is determined due to the weight group. But the planned goods issue date is still the same 05/21/2010 as in order.
I am assuming that since the route B has a route of 1 day so the planned goods issue date should be re-determined to 05/23/2010? IS there no scheduling done during delivery creation even though route and subsequently transit time has changed?
Please let me know the answer to this...
Thanks
Shobhit

Hi ,
You can use TA - MASS . Enter object type - BUS2032(for sales orders) on initial screen and select sales item data.
Next screen enter selection fields like sales order no and items. After giving order no and item range , execute and enter all new values for any item data fields. After pressing button "carry out mass change", don't forget to press save button.

Reschedulig Date Problem in Planning Run

Hello All,
Need Clarification..
The Scenario:
The Requirement date (OrdRes) is 13.02.2009, The planned Order generated is on 13.02.2009.
Now the OrdRes Date Changed Manually to 27.01.2009.
After Background MRP Run, in MD04 against the planned order, the Rescheduling date proposed is 27.01.2009 and exception message is 30 ( Plan process according to schedule).
System is Proposing the date, but not actually shifting the planned order.
If I re-run the MRP Manually, the Rescheduling is happening.
What at first place the rescheduling not happened? after manual MRP run the rescheduling happening?
P.N:
1. The Planned Order is not Firmed
2. The Planning Parameters are same for Background Run and Manual one.
Your inputs are highly appreciated..
Regards,
Siva

Hi Siva Kumar,
Once u change the delivery date (order rervation of Header), system will create planning file entry for Child materail and set Exception message 30 of child planned order
When u run the MRP next, child material should be included in the Planning Run and rescheduling should be happened .
This is what my finidings, Please check.
Pradeep

Planning run issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for