Planning strategy change

Hi,
My client is going for strategy change from 52 to 20. I want to know which all reports are affected due to this change and the impacts of this change.pls share your knowledge.
regards
Ashok

Hi
The report which will affect is MD04.
It is a major change .To avoid inconsistencies, pl. make sure all requirements should be cleaned.
Othe wise the report MD04 shows lot of inconsisitecies.
Regards
YMREDDY

Similar Messages

Planning strategy change from 52 to 20

dear all,
my client wants to change the planning strategy from 52 to 20, if we change the strategy what are all implications it will affect,kindly explain what are the things we have to check in PP,QM,MM and FICO modules
it will be very helpful if it has explained by individual modules
regards
thyagarajan
Message was edited by:
thyagarajan krishnamurthy

Changing from 52 to 20
following effcets
See that all the PIR's are consumed before switch over.
Do you have any part of BOM items specific to sales order, if so need to be carefull about the consumption...may have to plan sme stock before switch over as in 20 and 52, the important difference is procurement before and after.
Usually in 20 VPRS condition type is anabled for costing if the product.
Mainly need to plan for sub assembly and component well in advance as change will definetely effect the procurement cycle and may end up with shoratge.

MRP exception message 64 and planning strategy group 52

Hi Gurus,
I have done extensive search online in the forum to find the route cause why we are getting MRP exception message 64 for a specific material in one of our plants. This exception message does not occur for the same materials which is also produced in another plant.
I was just wondering whether the planning strategy group of 52 in MRP 3 view would have any effect on the frequent occurrence of exception message 64. I know that the 64 message occurs when the routing time is higher than the in house production time. If that's the case where to look for in routing to correct this, apart from this do we need to look at work centers and other details. I'm not a PP person but still was curious to know see if i could take a shot at it.
Also the MRP settings that we follow in the plant where this problem does not occur is NETCH, Create PR - 2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, Planning mode - 3, scheduling -2
in the plant where the 64 message occurs quite often is Netch, Create PR -2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, planning mode - 1, Schdeduliing - 1
I was thinking do MRP settings and planning strategy group would have any impact on why we are getting the 64 wexception message
Because of this 63 exception message, the downstream components are getting wrong signals.
Thanks
Ravi

Hello Ravi
Generallt, exception message "64 - Production finish after order finish" is triggered when the order start date is in the past and system automatically changes to forward scheduling to calculate the finish date.
Note 1913017 explains how the order basic date is calculated and adjusted in case of forward scheduling, however, you are using strategy 52 and this is a very special scenario, whever VP planned orders are generated.
The VP planned orders will always be adjusted to the requirements date even if the requirements date is in the past. This is a special feature in the planning segment, since these orders are only kind of 'virtual' planned orders. These orders only have to provide the demand requirements for the components in time.
Therefore, there is a relationship between strategy 52 (VP planned order) and the exception message observed.
BR
Caetano

Reg:Planning Strategy 40

Hi friends,
i need to know about planning strategy 40.
For EX:
1. suppose if we have planned and created PIR from january to march(quarterly plan) for any product, now if we want to change the plan how the system will behave..can we change the PIR which we have generated from JANUARY TO march.
If it is possible to chnage ,,how to change the PIR..what will be the impacts.
2' Can we create another PIR once again from january to march...or feB to march apart from existing PIR
3. suppose if i have created PIR from january to march , and splitted into daily plan, in between if the sales orders comes how this planning strategy 40 will behave.As it is make to stock.
For Ex:
We have planned 1000 numbers in the month of january, daily 50numbers production.
Suppose if we get sales order for another 2000 apart from our planning 1000numbers ,how this planning strategy will behave.
Thanks in addvance.

Dear
Planning startegy 40 works like follows :
It is basically Consumption of PIR not Reduction of PIR .
Example :Let say you have PIR for 1000 for January and it is appearing in MD04
Now you have sales order for another 2000 for same month .Here PIR quantity is less than the Sales Order Qty ! Now run MRP -MD03/MD02 -NETCH , 2,1,3,3,2 and check the Result .Here PIR will be vanished and PR/Planned of 2000PC will be appearing in MD04.So PIR is consumed by Sales Order .
Now you have PIR for 2000 and you have sales order for another 1000 for same month .Here PIR quantity is more than the Sales Order Qty ! If you goto MD04-Sales Order will not appear at all .That means Sales Order is geting fullfilled by PIR deamnd. Now run MRP -MD03/MD02 -NETCH , 2,1,3,3,2 and check the Result .Here Sales will be vanished and PR/Planned of 2000PC will be appearing in MD04.
Refer : Re: Industry wise planning strategy usage
Answer of your questions :
1.You can goto MD62-Change and add PIR questiy at Material level , Plan Numbers , Product Group Level
2.You can create but it will update th exsiting motnhly requirement in the same planning table in MD62
3.This question is answerd in the above explanation .
Hope it helps
Regards
JH

Cutover planning strategy doc

Does anybody have Cutover Planning/Strategy document for PI/XI? I do have the ASAP standard.. but I feel there must be one with lot of good information.. please send it to my gsvas81at gmail dot com

Hi,
We restricted from NEUPL................
When i have gone thru entire process my findings for this problem is as follows
1) When A planning strategy is changed in a plant?plants the existing/Pending PIRs need to closed or deleted. If there are any PIRs pending the system can not select new req Type automatically.
2) All the Depending requirements schedule lines and purchase orders for existing PIRs need to be closed before going to new Planning Strategy
If the user follows this procedure then the system will automatically uses "Control of Requirements Type Determination " and a required "Req Type" populates in user parameters. otherwise there will be planning inconsistency
Please correct me if i am wrong
Pavan

MRP exception handling for planning strategy 52

Hi All,
How to handing MRP exception in Mass? For example, header material having two sub assembly and 3 raw materials in it's BOM. As per planning strategy 52, we maintain PIR for finished part, if we run MRP planning will be generated with respect to Planned Independent Requirement(PIR). Now, the problem is the higher/upper level material planing date is lower than low level material, It means Semi finished material(SF2) planning date is for example ( 15 june 2014) at the same time another lower level semi finished material (SF1) planning date is (18 june 2014). In this case without completing SF1, we can't produce SF2 because SF1 is an component of SF2. In the same way, system will propose the planning info for all raw material/semi finished. How we will handle this exception in mass since we using more materials in shop floor.Hence, it's really hard to planner to adjust the planing date for each and every material wise. How to handle/adjust this MRP exception? How to make system to calculate dependent materials availability to calculate next level material's planning date (start,end)? We understand that we have to maintain proper master information like in-house production days, planned delivery date, Gr processing date etc., to get planning information. Apart from that how we handle or to get without this kind of exceptional message? Please suggest
Thanks

AKS,
There is absolutely nothing wrong with having exception messages. Expecting to be able to perform some mass transaction that will magically make all messages "go away" is unreasonable. In any real life business, there will be new exception messages with every MRP run - sometimes thousands of them.
These messages indicate that there is something the matter with the plan; but they don't really tell you what is the best way to fix the plan. There may not be an easy way to fix this plan, it may actually require having your planners examine each PIR, trace down the BOM, and determine what is the best solution for that PIR. Once you have decided what is wrong with your plan, then ask me what mass changes are available to fix THAT problem.
Now, to your question. If you want all the dates to line up, then allow dates in the past. Although this solution doesn't give you results that are any more realistic than your current solution, you will eliminate most of the exception message 10's; and, if all your master data is correct, most of the supply and demand dates should line up. The messages will be replaced with a boatload of "new, and start date in the past" or similar. You can allow MRP to create procurement proposals with start dates in the past by changing the appropriate settings in OPPQ and/or OPPR. Also affected by scheduling parameters found in OPU5 and OPU3.
This is a business decision. Some planners prefer not to allow dates in the past. Others just the opposite. You (or the client, if you are a consultant) have to decide which is best for your company.
Best Regards,
DB49

Planning Strategy 81 - Assembly order

Hello,
My requirement is as follows :-
On creation of Sales order Planned order get trigger.
Any changes in sales order should reflect in Planned order.
Any changes in dates of planned order must get reflect in Sales order.
For this I am using planning strategy 81ie Assembly order. If i do changes in sales order the planned order is changed.
But if i change planned order dates system gives message "Assembly order, changes are transferred to Sales Order"
but if i check the sales order there are no changes.
Any one please show some light on this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Abhijit

Hi Abhijit,
1. Kindly check the setting for hte requirement class in the ovzg.
2. in this check if hte no update is selected.
3. As per your requirement no update should be empty
Kindly check and confirm.
REg
dsk

Planning strategy 59

Hi All,
I have a query on strategy 59.
I create PIR for phantom assembly & run MRP. Requirements for components are generated. Components are produced.
Sales order for finished material is entered. MRP Run for finished material. Planned order for finished material converted to process order & brought to stock. PGI is dine against SO of finished material.
My query is that after these steps although the SO for finished material vanishes, the dep req. still appear for phantom assembly & does not disappear. Also PIR of phantom assembly though appear to be reduced, but if we look at it in display/change mode original qty is there, so in actual terms PIR is not consumed but is anly allocated.
Any pointers on this?
regards,
Mohit

Hello,
For Planning Strategy 59,
please check the following master data to be set up for Phantom Material:
u2022     Strategy group 59 on the MRP screen.
u2022     Set the indicator for assembly planning, the Mixed MRP indicator, to 1 on the MRP screen.
u2022     Consumption parameters (Consumption mode, Bwd consumption, Fwd consumption on the MRP screen) to allow for consumption of planned independent requirements.
u2022     Set the Special procurement field on the MRP screen to 50 (phantom assembly)
u2022     If you are using this strategy in a make-to-stock environment, you must set the Individual/coll. indicator is set to 2 on the MRP screen.
BOM must be maintained for the finished products and for the phantom assembly.
You also must set the Backflush field to 1 (2 may also be possible) on the MRP screen of the material masters for the components of the phantom assembly.
And assign the special procurement indicator 60(Phantom in Planning)

Planning strategy group

Dear Gurus,
Please elaborate the function & logic of planning strategy group used for production planning? How the alternate strategies works under main strategy?
Regards,
SAP CONS

Once Planning strategy is created , Then we need to assign planning strategy in Planning Strategy Group in IMG> Prdn> prdn planning> PIR> define strategy Group,
In Planning stratergy Group we can assign 1 main strategy and 7 alternate strategy.
Ex: If the same material is produced both MTS and rarely MTO means
Maintain a Main strategy as 10 and Alternate strategy as 20
Then when ever sale order comes System will take KSL is sale order, system will consider MTS as per Main stratergy
If you want to procure based on Customer for that Material Then Go to procurement Tab of sale order change the Requirement type as KE. and save, ( system will allow only KSL and KE based On streatergy Group, System will take deafult main stratergy, IF you want to change the stratergy got to sale order procurement tab, change the reqmt type)

Link between process order and sales order for planning strategy 52

Hello,
I investigate the possibility of a link between "sales order" and "planned order / process order" for the usage of planning strategy 52 (planning w/o final assembly, make to stock).
I know, this is not conform to the basics of planning strategies (EITHER make to order OR make to stock) and I suspect it would be a modification. Of course we have the alternative "make to order" - strategy 50, but we do not want to use individual customer stocks.
Is anybody there with similar customer requirements or project experiences?
Thanks in advance,
Joerg
Message was edited by:
Jörg Demtschuk

Hi Jorg,
To my understanding if you need hard pegging then in SAP only Individual requirement is possible.
Or else you need to create a custom transactions/table to identify Sale order and when ever a process order is created by selecting the sale order record, the process order detials should also get updated against that.
You need to take the help of ABAP expert for this,
Regards,
Prasobh
Reward points if this was useful

Want to cancel my Photoshop one-year plan and change to a full student annual plan, but when I click on cancel plan it only tells me to view my billing info which doesn't help at all!

I'm trying to cancel my Photoshop one-year plan and change to a full student annual plan, but when I click on cancel plan it only tells me to view my billing info which doesn't help at all!

Cancel http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/return-cancel-or-change-order.html
-or by telephone http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/phone-support-orders.html
Upgrade single to all Cloud http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1235382 may help

When will EK02 appear in the Sales Order?? For different planning strategy?

Hi Experts,
In our SAP system ,when you create a sales order with a material which planning strategy is
50 Planning without final assembly (MTO) , in the item detail screen , on the "Conditions"
TAB, we will see condition type EK02 and its value.
But when I create a sales order with a material which planning strategy is 40 Planning with
final assembly (MTS),in the item detail screen , on the "Conditions" TAB, condition type
EK02 will not appear.
I have checked the customizing of our SAP system ,as follows:
For planning strategy 50, the Requirements class is "045"(MTO val. with cons.),and on the
configuration screen of Requirements class,we see "Condition type for copying costs from
line items" (CndTyLineItems) is null ,no value ,not "EK02".
And for planning strategy 50,the the Requirements class is "050"(Warehouse consumpt.) and
and on the configuration screen of Requirements class,we see "Condition type for copying
costs from line items" (CndTyLineItems) is also null ,no value ,not "EK02".
And on the configuration screen of Sale Order Type screen(VOV8), we see "Condition type for
copying costs from line items" (CndTyLineItems) is "EK02" for all the sales order type we
have used.
So I am very confused.
Why material with planning strategy 40 there is no EK02 in the sales order?
Why material with planning strategy 50 there is EK02 in the sales order?
Where is the EK02 come from? The requriement class ? Or the Salse order Type?
Are there any other customizing for Condition type EK02 determination?
Thanks very for any reply!!

Hi,
In MTO you will create Process order.
And to Produce a Item you use Sub components that is Raw material
That raw material cost is EK02 which you maintain in the Material Master - Accounting View 1.
You can see cost in the Process Order also .
Note : Dont post same in different posts

I am planning to change my e- mail address to a g mail account.... how do I change the info with Apple?

I am planning to change my e-mail address to a g-mail account.
How do I change my apple accounts?

Manage your Apple ID primary, rescue, alternate, and notification email addresses. Add, change, or delete the several types of email addresses you can use with your Apple ID account.

CO88-Error :Perform the planned price change for material

Hi Experts,
While running CO88 i get this error. "Perform the planned price change for material ". My material is manage at S and it doesn't have any marked cost. The status is FR and no other status on cost etimate for the article are active. what i shoul do? why if i run the PP order with KO88 i don't have any error?
Please help i'm facing the closing period.

Hi,
If dynamic price change is active in your system the first posting in the new period of this material tries to
- release a future cost estimate of that period OR
- change the price to the future price in accounting view
(if the future price date is reached)
Unfortunately this dynamic price change does not work in order settlement. Therefore you are asked to perform the price change first by t-code CKME (or CK24).
If you are using price determination control 3, any price change or release should always be the first transaction in a new period to avoid any inconsistencies.
The dynamic price release will only release the price with transactions which involve material movement and this is not the case by posting invoices and order settlements.
if you are in period 12/2009 then a settlement in 12/2009 does not require the release cost estimate of 01/2010.
But if you are already in 01/2010 therefore settlement in 12/2009 is a posting into the previous period. This will change also data of the current period. Therefore the cost estimate has to be released first.
Another option, if you don't want to receive this message, would be to change this message from Error to Warning (check note 434752).
Please follow the following steps:
T-CD:OMRM
Message M8 394
=>you set the message type to '-' for error message M8394, that means no message is to be issued.
regards
Waman

Read Only/ Plan Mode Changes for a layout with two different queries

Hi,
I have a situvation where a layout opens in a read only mode and when
the users click on button plan, it changes to plan mode. The catch here however is the queries
for read mode and plan mode are slightly different, in the read only mode the query has subtotals
and other calculations that are not a part of the plan mode ( where they input forecasts).
I know if the read and plan query are the same, we can achieve this through the command
SET_DATA_ENTRY_MODE. In case they are different, as above, how can i achieve this.
Thanks
Rashmi.

Say you are using two different queries as DP1 & DP2 for Display and Plan mode respectively. You also have one Analysis grid item in Web template which initially points to DP1.
On PLAN button call command SET_ITEM_PARAMETER to set the data provider of analysis item to DP2.
OR
You have only one dataprovider in your web template as DP1 initially pointing to Query 1 which you want to show in Display mode. Then on PLAN button call a command SET_DATA_PROVIDER_PARAMETERS to point the DP1 to 2nd query instead of 1st query. You can find this command under Commands for data Provider --> Basic data provider commands.
Edited by: Deepti Maru on Nov 27, 2009 9:52 PM

Planning strategy change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for