Plans larger than 500GB

Are there any plans of having quotas increased from the maximum 500GB that is available now. I'm finding my limit is being used quite frequently and quickly as the months go on. I utilise iTunes for a lot of my TV and am finding that for the qaulity that iTunes deliver the average TV show is around 1.3GB. Along with other net based activity and 3 children ranging from high school to primary, for me personally 500GB is the new 200GB.I don't need unlimited (although it would be handy) I'm hoping that perhaps 1TB plans might be in the pipeline.I'm in a Telstra only exchange and aprt fromExetel and Dodo (unlimited) iiNet seem to be the only ones offering a 1TB plan via TW.  Regards  

DanfromQLD wrote:
It amazes me how in this day and age that you don't have access to a decent service, wow! Speaks volumes about the current telecommunications infrastructure we currently have and hence the NBN will help aleviate a lot of this. The service I get is decent, I have some minor congestion issues in peak times but other than that it is a decent service.  Am I happy what I pay for it, no, but what choice is there from another ISP?  None. The NBN will be very helpful to us, it will level off the internet access options for everyone far better than it does now.DanfromQLD wrote:
And you seem perplexed that I find 500GB not ample but in the same sentence you struggle with your own quota. A tad contradictory don't ya think  Are you kidding, you are trying to tell me that while you have access to 500GB I should be happy with and not complain about not having enough data with only 15GB available.  I challenge you and your family to go a month on only 15GB TOTAL.
Contradictory, rofl and again are you kidding!.  Again you get 500GB per month, try and limit that to 15GB.  Or as I said if 500GB really is not enough BUY another account or go elsewhere if other ISP's are offerring 1TB plans, no one is stopping you,DanfromQLD wrote:
I really don't need to reiterate what I have written in my initial post but if you ponder back though and do some maths you might educate yourself somewhat. Just for sh$%s and giggles, please do some reseach on itunes and file sizes along with a family of five that includes teenages.  We are a family of 5, with our children all teenagers, so what's your point?  
If you do the maths you get 500GB per month, that is 16.6GB (roughly) per day, note how that is more than what we get for a whole month,  That is 3.34GBs per day per person in your household. Continue with the maths, we get 15GB (for the whole month), that is 500MBs (note MB not GB) per day, which equated to 100MB's per day per person in our household.
If you do the maths the answer is quite an easy one to understand. Oh and knowing file sizes etc in itunes and everywhere else is essential in our household where we do not allow file downloads unless it is critical download like virus definition updates, we do not use youtube EVER!, we do not use Skype EVER! Our kids cannot play any form of online games EVER!DanfromQLD wrote:
 To give you some credit, we don't always use 500GB but the last few months we have so I asked the question.There is a reason there are ISPs out there with 1TB, 2TB and unlimited plans, the demand for bandwidth is increasing everyday.  I would hate to imagine how many HDDs you must have in your Computers to store 500GB or more per month.  I know storage is cheap but sheesh!  While I realise it is not all stored that is still a significant amount every month. Again if you want more data than the whopping 500GB's you already get. you have choices;1. Buy another plan2. Go to another ISP that provides larger plans (good luck with that)3. Get outside and do less on the computers Cheers GW

Similar Messages

  • New MacMini.....Any problem with hard drive greater than 500gb?

    I'm interested in buying a new MacMini. I could definitely use a hard drive larger than 500gb though. Is there any problem installing a drive larger than 500gb? Since the Mac store only offers 320 and 500gb, I'm wondering if there is some limitation (special size?) or other problem.
    I'd rather not have to use an additional external drive.
    Thanks in advance.
    Fabian

    Hi Fabian,
    any 2.5" SATA harddisk with a maximum height of 9.5mm fits in the Mac Mini.
    OSX doesn't "care" about the amount of GB the harddisk has.
    With the above specs 750GB seems to be the largest widely avaiable size but 1TB should be avaiable too.
    Have a look at MacSales or NewEgg.
    Regards
    Stefan

  • Time Machine: Must external HDD be a large or larger than internal drive?

    I have a 2TB HDD in a new iMac, and I have a couple of spare 500GB SATA drives I can liberate from my previous Mac. Before I buy enclosures for the externals, I'd like to know if TM requires an external drive the same size or larger than the internal drive it is to back up.
    Though I have a 2TB internal drive, it has 1.79TB available, and I could probably use a 500GB for quite a while before I need a larger backup drive.
    Thanks.
    BC
    driven

    BCDrums wrote:
    I have a 2TB HDD in a new iMac, and I have a couple of spare 500GB SATA drives I can liberate from my previous Mac. Before I buy enclosures for the externals, I'd like to know if TM requires an external drive the same size or larger than the internal drive it is to back up.
    Though I have a 2TB internal drive, it has 1.79TB available, and I could probably use a 500GB for quite a while before I need a larger backup drive.
    If you have only 210 GB on that 2 TB drive, then yes, a 500 GB drive will probably work fine, at least until you put a lot more data on your system.
    It does vary a great deal, of course, depending on how you use your Mac. If you frequently change and/or replace a lot of large files, you may fill it up rather quickly; if not, it may not fill up for quite a while.
    You might want to review these:
    Time Machine Tutorial
    How to back up and restore your files
    Time Machine Features
    and perhaps browse the Time Machine - Frequently Asked Questions *User Tip* at the top of this forum.

  • How to make linesize for autotrace be larger than 80?

    Is it possible to make that the linesize of the output in sqlplus to be larger than 80?
    I have my linesize = 150 but the output of the autotrace is wrapped and it is quite difficult to see.

    did you try?:
    SET LINESIZE 150Yes, I did. And it did not work.
    SQL> show user
    USER is "SCOTT"
    SQL> set linesize 150
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL> select 1 from emp, dept, bonus, emp, dept, emp, dept, emp, dept, bonus, emp, dept, emp, dept, b
    onus, emp, dept, bonus;
    no rows selected
    Execution Plan
       0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
       1    0   NESTED LOOPS
       2    1     NESTED LOOPS
       3    2       NESTED LOOPS
       4    3         NESTED LOOPS
       5    4           NESTED LOOPS
       6    5             NESTED LOOPS
       7    6               NESTED LOOPS
       8    7                 NESTED LOOPS
       9    8                   NESTED LOOPS
      10    9                     NESTED LOOPS
      11   10                       NESTED LOOPS
      12   11                         NESTED LOOPS
      13   12                           NESTED LOOPS
      14   13                             NESTED LOOPS
      15   14                               NESTED LOOPS
      16   15                                 NESTED LOOPS
      17   16                                   NESTED LOOPS
      18   17                                     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF '
              BONUS'
      19   17                                     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF '
              DEPT'
      20   16                                   TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EM
              P'
      21   15                                 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'BONU
              S'
      22   14                               TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      23   13                             TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
      24   12                           TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      25   11                         TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
      26   10                       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'BONUS'
      27    9                     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      28    8                   TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
      29    7                 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      30    6               TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
      31    5             TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      32    4           TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
      33    3         TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'BONUS'
      34    2       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT'
      35    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
    Statistics
              0  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
              3  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
            244  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            372  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              1  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              0  rows processed
    SQL>

  • Aperture exports jpeg files larger than original RAW files

    Can anyone tell me why a RAW file (10.6mb), when exported as a jpeg (10.8mb) from Aperture ends up larger than the original RAW file. The same RAW file when opened and then saved as a jpeg (6.4mb) in Photoshop is a lot smaller. The photo dimensions and resolution are the same in both saved files (34.5mb open file 300dpi 4256 x 2831 pix). I have tried this on several photos, all with similar results. For information I am saving the photos in both Photoshop and Aperture at 300dpi, original size and at a quality setting of 12. In these examples/tests I have done no work to the photos, obviously the file sizes increase after work has been carried out on the photos (in both Ps & Aperture)
    Almost doubling the size of saved jpegs has a massive implication on my library and may be one reason to consider Adobe Lightroom as this gives similar jpeg file sizes as Photoshop, i.e. almost half the size of the original RAW file
    Reducing the quality setting on saved jpegs is an obvious way to reduce file size, but not answering the question of the considerable discrepancy when saving to the same quality in different software
    Is this a feature of Aperture and nothing can be done about it ? I would prefer to use Aperture but cannot cope with the large jpeg sizes !
    Any comments would be much appreciated - thank you
    Nick

    Think you might be right Allen - The 12 quality saved jpegs seem to be pretty high quality, closer to the original than maybe the files saved in Ps at quality 12. I have just run an identical set of processing actions on all the files in Photoshop and the jpegs previously saved in Aperture at 12, 11 and even 8 quality settings seem to be better than the same files saved at 12 in Ps
    Bizarrely the file size drops from 10.6mb at quality setting 12 in Aperture, to 3.2mb when saved just one notch down at quality setting 11 in Aperture. That is a massive drop, esp considering the next one down, saving at quality 10 results in a 2.8mb file
    rw just ran some checks and tests on the file export settings and file sizes in Aperture, on a file I sent him, and we get the same results. So at least my version of Aperture is not up the wall !!
    Would be useful to have the explanations from Apple as to the vast variance in settings and file sizes, but I guess we will just have to keep guessing - and buying more and more hard drives for all the large files
    I am considering keeping the RAW originals in future, and I suppose in this case I need only save smaller jpegs, and issue at whatever size they are needed at the time - just needs a bit of planning to look after an ever increasing collection, which is about to have two sets of images added at a time now. Added to the already amassed 80 000 images at last count !)
    Thanks
    Nick

  • The estimated project size is larger than the target media chosen

    I am at a loss for trying to author a project using Adobe Encore.  I first tried to author the project using version CS2.  When attempting to export I received the following message:
    "The estimated project size is larger than the target media chosen.  While this is an estimate, the project may fail to build."
    I have authored hundereds of projects in the past, but have never received that message before.  I first thought that the problem was with the version of Encore I was using, but I received the exact same error when trying to author the project with Encore CS5.
    The project itself has one menu, a motion menu, and one video file.  The video file last 152 minutes, and I was attempting to export that to a dual layer DVD.  I have since tried exporting the file using Adobe Premier CS5.5 using a variety of settings.  I am trying to export it to a DVD-2 file, with the match soure attributes being set to the highest setting.  The setting on the main concept MPEG encoder is set to 5. I have tried exporting the file using both constant and varaible bit rates.
    When I recently exported the file using a contant bit rate of 6.5, I still had 650.4 MB remaining on my Encore project.  I still received the same error about the project size, and so I am thinking that something else is wrong.
    I have even exported the video file as an uncompressed AVI file, and then tried encoding it again using both Adobe Premier CS5.5 and the Adobe Encoder.  I still get the same error message about file size.
    Any help and/or suggestions about how to solve this problem would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!

    Using the Imgburn product worked! It also helped me figure out what the real problem was...
    As it turns out, some single-layer DVDs had been mixed in with my dual-layer DVDs. I feel very foolish about this.  All of my discs are printable, and so there is no indication written as far as what their capacity is on them.
    Encore can be a bit vague in identifying a problem such as this. For example, I can set the settings to plan for a dual-layer disc, and it will display a graphical status indicator with that capacity in mind. When I saw the original file message error I honestly believed that there was a problem with the encoded file instead of the type of disc itself.
    Imgburn instantly displayed the discrepancy in the type of disc I had loaded and the needed capacity for the type of project that I was trying to create.
    Thanks again for your help!

  • Email account folder in /user/library/mail is much larger than full mailbox archive for the same account

    Hi,
    I recently changed jobs and want to archive all email (with attachments in place) for the associated work email account.  I also plan to remove the old work email account (IMAP) from the list of active mailboxes in Apple Mail.  I don't want Spotlight searches for personal or current work email cluttered with results from my old job.
    I have created an archive of the old work account by doing Mailbox Archive for all of the IMAP folders for that account.  The entire archive is 1.7GB in size.
    Before I delete the old account from my Mail preferences, I want to make sure that I have really exported everything.  So I've compared the size of the new archive folder with that of the mailbox folder in users/.../Library/Mail for that same account.  That latter is 8.7GB in size.  Why the enormous difference?
    Can the difference be attributed to lack of compression and indices (which would be rebuilt if I import the archive) for spotlight searches?  Am I missing something in the archive that I created?
    I've created a zip of the system folder.  Can I easily restore this at a latter time if I delete the email account from my Mail preferences?
    Is there a better way to achieve my objective?
    Mitoids

    I did find a "Recovered Messages" by looking in the the Mail client under "On My Mac" (I don't normally use that feature).  One message with an accicental 99MB attachment that I never sent, was recovered ~60times, consuming 5.7GB. 
    I deleted all of those, but the size ~/Library/Mail/xxxaccount folder did not change much.  It is still much larger than the Archive I created.  BTW, this is an IMAP account that was syncing with corporate GMail.

  • Print the report on page has width larger than height and not landscape mode

    Hi,
    I'm trying to print report on page (Width: 18cm, Height: 13cm) which the width larger than the height.
    The problem is windows keeps changing the page oreintation to landscape and when I change it back to portrait its changing the width to 13cm and height to 18cm.
    I'm using dot matrix printer to print the report, if i put Landscape , printer is printing the text in horizontal.
    Already i have tried to setup the custom for on printer, and used custom page size but it is changing to landscape.
    I need to print the report with out preview, direct print top printer, NO PDF....
    Thank you .....

    Hi Anil,
    After testing the issue in my environment, I can reproduce it. When I set (Width: 18cm, Height: 13cm) as the Report Page size, it would automatically convert Orientation from Portrait to Landscape. Because the Orientation displayed is dependent on the page
    width and page height of the report.
    But in my scenario, the Orientation option just change the Width and Height sizes, it couldn’t affect the text rotation. I guess this issue can be caused by the printer and printer driver, please try to update them. Reference:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15244336/printing-in-landscape-or-portrait-automatically-rotates-text-ssrs?lq=1
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • Database much larger than expected when using secondary databases

    Hi Guys,
    When I load data into my database it is much larger than I expect it to be when I turn on secondary indexes. I am using the Base API.
    I am persisting (using TupleBindings) the following data type:
    A Key of size ~ *80 Bytes*
    A Value consisting of 4 longs ~ 4*8= *32 Bytes*
    I am persisting ~ *280k* of such records
    I therefore expect ballpark 280k * (80+32) Bytes ~ *31M* of data to be persisted. I actually see ~ *40M* - which is fine.
    Now, when I add 4 secondary database indexes - on the 4 long values - I would expect to see approximately an additional 4 * 32 * 280k Bytes -> ~ *35M*
    This would bring the total amount of data to (40M + 35M) ~ *75M*
    (although I would expect less given that many of the secondary keys are duplicates)
    What I am seeing however is *153M*
    Given that no other data is persisted that could account for this, is this what you would expect to see?
    Is there any way to account for the extra unexpected 75M of data?
    Thanks,
    Joel
    Edited by: JoelH on 10-Feb-2010 10:59
    Edited by: JoelH on 10-Feb-2010 10:59

    Hi Joel,
    Now, when I add 4 secondary database indexes - on the 4 long values - I would expect to see approximately an additional 4 * 32 * 280k Bytes -> ~ 35MA secondary index consists of a regular JE database containing key-value pairs, where the key of the pair is the secondary key and the value of the pair is the primary key. Your primary key is 80 bytes, so this would be 4 * (4 + 80) * 280k Bytes -> ~ 91M.
    The remaining space is taken by per-record overhead for every primary and secondary record, plus the index of keys itself. There are (280k * 5) records total. Duplicates do not take less space.
    I assume this is an insert-only test, and therefore the log should contain little obsolete data. To be sure, please run the DbSpace utility.
    Does this answer your question?
    --mark                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • All of a sudden I can't change my Photoshop CS4 Font size any larger than 18px.  What did I do?

    Hi
    I was working on a logo today in Photoshop.  I clicked on the font size to increase the text size from 18px to 30px.  I got a message that I couldn't go any larger than 18 px.  Any idea how to fix this???
    Thanks
    Sarahb

    Please note that your post is already buried in the old pages of the forum.
    Due to the current unavailability of clairvoyants and mind-readers in the forum, we respectfully request you supply sensible, complete details.
    BOILERPLATE TEXT:
    Note that because this is boilerplate text, not all points may apply to any given, specific poster.
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
    such as your platform (Mac or Win),
    exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
    your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
    the type of file you were working on,
    machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
    what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
    what error message(s) you receive,
    if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
    if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
    etc.,
    someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster).
    a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • Finder download from afp server failed one file larger than 2Gb

    I am using 10.5.1 on iMac.
    I guess this shouldn't be a problem.
    I download a file from university's afp server, but fails when if has downloaded 2GB (the file is larger than 2GB) with error code 1309.
    Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Thank you.

    the disk format is:
    Mac OS Extended (Journal)

  • My MBP has started to send out TCP packets larger than the MTU on the NIC - is there any place that this can be overriden?

    Got a very weird issue here and wondering if anyone has any other ideas. Basically over the wired NIC only, my Mac has started to send out large HTTP/HTTPS packets from the browser (> 1500 bytes) Captures show packet sizes from 2000 all the way to 4000 sometimes. This happens in Firefox and Chrome so doesn't appear to be application related.
    This causes fragmentation issues and traffic drops which basically causes most of my websites and  tools to crash and burn (and I get all sorts of SSL errors from applications, etc).
    It appears to be limited to just TCP packets as pings with the DF bit set will not send any larger than 1500 bytes.
    However if I switch to wireless, everything works fine and captures show the correct maximum packet size of 1500 for all packets leaving my client.
    The MTU on the  en0 interface is 1500 as per ifconfig and I made sure that it was set to 1500 in Network config panel (because there is an option for jumbo frames there which bumps up the MTU).
    A packet capture also shows that during the three way handshake the TCP MSS is successfully sent and negotiated as 1480, but then it appears to ignore that when sending packets later in the TCP stream.
    I've rebooted, upgraded to 10.7.4, checked the "sysctl" outputs and matched against a Mac not having the issue.
    This is the newest MBP 15 inch model.
    Any other ideas on things to check?

    Have you used any sort of "tuner" software? You are obviously an advanced user. Sometimes we hack things up and forget about it later. If you are sure you didn't do that, maybe poke around with IPv6 settings. Supposedly people are trying to enable that and it is going to be a disaster.

  • How can I get the "Open" and "Save As" dialog boxes to open at larger than their default size?

    How can I get the "Open" and "Save As" dialog boxes to open at larger than their default size?  I would like them to open at the size they were previously resized like they used to in previous operating systems.  They currently open at a very small size and the first colum is only a few letters wide necessitating a resize practically every time one wants to use it.  Any help would be appreciated.

    hi Prasanth,
    select werks matnr from ZVSCHDRUN into table it_plant.
    sort it_plant by matnr werks.
    select
            vbeln
            posnr
            matnr
            werks
            erdat
            kbmeng
            vrkme
            from vbap
            into table it_vbap
            for all entries in it_plant
            where matnr = it_plant-matnr and
                  werks = it_plant-werks.
    and again i have to write one more select query for vbup.
    am i right?

  • Exporting from InDesign to PDF, and the updated PDF is larger than a month ago and not printing easily on letter paper, it is PDF presets?

    Hello,
    I am exporting from InDesign to a PDF and the page is larger in the PDF then others I have exported. Is this because of the PDF presents? One of the project managers is not able to print it out on 8.5 x 11 paper, but the document presets for InDesign are the same as before. I wish I could upload the PDFs to show, but the newly exported PDF is larger than the version I created a month ago. I created a PDF binder and the newly updated PDF is almost a .5 inch wider with the same export presets. Any thoughts?

    Sadira00123456789 wrote:
    One of the project managers is not able to print it out on 8.5 x 11 paper, but the document presets for InDesign are the same as before.
    I suspect the project manager simply has his/her copy of Reader/Acrobat set to print at actual size, rather than "Fit" (assuming the InDesign page size is truly 8.5 x 11).
    ..the newly updated PDF is almost a .5 inch wider with the same export presets.
    It would have nothing to do with export presets. How are you determining that half-inch difference?

  • How to create a map that is larger than the game in width and height?

    hi,
    i wounder how i can create a map(not the design) that is larger than the game in width and height, part of it will appear in the main page and anther part you can move to it after you press the arrow symbol, but the map is just one image so i want put it in line and out line the game page, and the out line part includes buttons and symbols the player can use, but it will be in line and the other part will be out line when you press the left arrow or the down arrow, how i can do that?
    and is that possible to animate it so when the player press the arrow, will give it action to start the animation in one sec, i know how to animate it if that possible but i don't know which code i will use for the mouse click with the arrow symbol, and how to use the same code in the same symbol to start anther animation depending on which part of the map is on?

    I don't know a lot about mask and masked layers and how to work with the normal layers beside i will use some 3D graphics but not in the background, i will explain all this to you to be more clearly.
    first i am using action script 3.0
    close ex,
    you have 2d map"image"  900*300 pixel.
    this image contains some 2d symbols when you click will go to anther normal map (anther normal layer) so they must appear.
    your game 320*320 px, and the place the map will show on 300*300, and there's basics objects will be in most pages including the page that show the map so i don't know a lot about how this will work with mask layers.
    so you can only see the left side of the map image and what it contains, while there's two arrows one to the left and one to the right there's three cases here,
    first when it show the left side(start from x:0 to x:300), the left arrow will not active when you press and the right arrow will start an animation that make the map image move to the mid side in one sec when you press.
    in mid side (start from x:301 to x:600) the same left arrow will active when you press to send you back to the left side while the same right arrow will be active to send you not to the mid side but to the right side,
    when moved to the right side the same left arrow will be active to send you to the mid and the right will not active when you press and depending on that,
    first how to make the large image appear with the three sides in the same place without effecting the other objects "like disappearing them" ?
    and the codes i need in the same left or right arrow symbol to make different actions with the same symbol when clicked depending on which part of the map is on.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error executing Rapidmart Job for Sales Rapidmart. AW_JOBEXECUTION not found error.

    Hello experts, I am currently in the processing of installing a sales rapidmart. I've followed all the steps up to the point of deploying the Sales_Load_SAP job in Data Services, however, when I run the job I receive the following error: 332 15284 DB

  • Twitter link--page appears only for a moment

    On the homepage for my disabled grandson there is a link to twitter. All of a sudden it no longer works. When you click on the link the twitter page appears momentarily and then disappears. Eventually the stars appear at the top, but nothing else. Be

  • Tecra M11: What cable to connect to HDMI TV

    a few quick questions, 1. Which cable should i get to plug my laptop to the tv preferably HDMI? I only have a mini port something and a SATA sockets... 2. I would like to try and use my laptop for faxing however there is no modem can i buy one? What

  • How to create array with "n" elements...

    Hy, how can i create a array with "n" elements ?

  • Albums and keywords - moving library

    I need to move my library to a new internal drive. I have found the info I need to do this but I'm wondering if all my albums and keywords will be transfered with the photos? Is there anything else I need to worry about or consider? gbs