Plant disappears in extended attributes

Hello SRM Experts,
Systems: SRM-Server 550, ERP2005
scenario: classic
After a Upgrade from SRM 3.5 to SRM 5.0 I like to enter a plant in PPOMA_BBP extended Attributes. I can select the backend system and the plant but when I save it, the whole entry will disappear. The message "Data has been saved" 5A 497 appears but the entry is gone.
I have already used the report BBP_LOCATION_GET_ALL.
Has anybody an idea why this problem occurs?
Thank you very much for your answers.
Kind regards
Axel

Hi
Ensure that you are not making settings from SRM Web user and only using SRM Logon user in GUI.
Please refer to the OSS notes.
<b>Note 110909 - Composite SAP note on generic attributes
Note 512660 - EBP: Defaults for plant and storage location disappear
1012805 - 'Settings' - Input search for Plant / WRK is not working
672275 - EBP4.0: Performance during start of 'Shop' (shopping cart)
Note 864221 - EBP 4.0+: Performance location</b>
Please detail your steps, how to re-produce the error.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

Plant disappears from PPOMA?

Hi all.
From time to time on of my plants disappear in the PPOMA structure for no reason, meaning that my users will receive the error in their shopping cart "Plant for follow-on document missing". I cannot see anywhere why the plant has disappeared from the PPOMA, has anyone heard of a similar problem? What could cause the plant to disappear from the extended attributes of an org unit?
DM

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
<u>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help -></u>
Note 815849 FAQ: Account assignment system response
Note 538605 Shopping cart: Determine company code/plant/storage location
Note 563469 Shopping cart: no plant/storage location texts or BBP_PD 247
Note 679007 No purchase orders from copied bid invitations
Note 631590 Create standard template: Copy favorites
Note 413405 Missing product number in basic data of shopping basket
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

How to set a extended attribute as read-only in runtime

Hi Team,
I would like to set a extended attribute as read-only in runtime based in a condition.
I tried with "Criterion" in a extended model definition, but if the condition is false the content field disappear.
Best regards

Hi Bruno,
About the first part of your problem : User with permission and user without permission.
To meet your needs I would have defined a Group named "WithPermission" and associated this group to a Member (user) "A"
While other users would not have been associated with this group.
When an user login I would have checked what groups that are associated with. If the group "WithPermission" was found I would have allowed the current login user to write "My Example". If the current login user was not associated to group name "WithPermission". The user would not have been able to edit the field.
I did a search in the metamodel object and I found nothing Method. Following my reading it seems that it is not possible. Read below.
In Sybase Guide "Customizing and Extending PowerDesigner" - CHAPTER 7: Scripting PowerDesigner you can read the following :
Manipulating the Repository By Script
PowerDesigner lets you access the Repository feature via scripting using the RepositoryConnection as BaseObject global property.
It allows you to retrieve the current repository connection, which is the object that manages the connection to the repository server and provides access to documents and objects stored under the repository.
The RepositoryConnection is equivalent to the root node in the Repository browser.
You can access the repository documents, but you cannot access the repository administration objects, like users, groups, configurations, branches, and list of locks. In addition, only the last version of a repository document is accessible using scripting.
As described by Dirk I think the only thing you can do is to make a check on a specific username. Unfortunately it will be "hard coded" in your program. Or If you can by vb script access the repository tables. You could resolve your problem by checking Group permission associated to each users logged in..

How to Update Extended Attributes For the Users in SRM Organization?

Hi,
I am using 'BBP_UPDATE_ATTRIBUTES' function module to load the Default Attributes for the users in a custom program. I am able to update many attributes like company code, Movement type, catalog id, material usage, shop on behalf of and address ship to. But I am having problem updating extended attributes Plants(Attribute ID 'WRK') and Storage Locations (Attribute ID 'LAG').
Storage location and Plants has many values. Can anyone have experienced this problem before. I appreciate any help I get. I debugged enough and not able to find any other function module to do this.
Thanks and Regards,
Sreeni..

Hi Sreeni,
I'm stuck up in the same problem. Did you get any solution for this? If yes please provide the same.
Regards,
Gajendra
Message was edited by: Gajendra Bhatt

FM for Extended Attributes Mantenance

Hello all,
is there function module for maintaining extended attributes (plant, storage location) in org structure like is BBP_UPDATE_ATTRIBUTES for standard attributes.
I am searching for it but with no luck for now :o(
TIA
Gordan

Hello gordan,
You can use bbp_update_attributes for this.
For location, attribute id is WRK, you have to fill the log_sys and field low with value from table bbp_locmap
For material group, attribute is prcat.
Test function bbp_read_attribute to see how formating the value field.
Rgds,
Pierre

When I restore my Mac with Time Machine and then want to partition my disk, Disk Utility always says incorrect number of extended attributes

When I need to restore my Mac from a time machine backup and then partition my hard disk (the disk inside the computer not the time machine disk), Disk Utility always says "Incorrect Number of Extended Attributes". I then boot into Recovery HD and run disk repair. The result? "The volume Macintosh HD appears to be OK". So then I reboot into normal OS and try the partition again, still Incorrect number of extended attributes. I have even tried /sbin/fsck -fy in single-user mode but it still says the volume is ok. I have tried partition my disk in the recovery HD and it still fails.
Can anyone please help me solve this problem?

Try something stronger, such as DiskWarrior or TechTool Pro.
iMac refurb (27-inch Mid 2011), OS X Mavericks (10.9.4), SL & ML, G4 450 MP w/Leopard, 9.2.2

Cannot create or replace : The specified extended attribute name was invalid.

New problem arrived today. Trying to copy a file from 10.6 server with an XP (SP3) client. I get this error:
Cannot create or replace (file name here): The specified extended attribute name was invalid.
The contents of the file can be copied, but not the folder. Other files can be copied. There are no funny characters. The name is not too long. I propogated the permissions on the share and that had no affect. The problem exists on three different XP systems. Can't find extended properties that could be causeing a problem. Any ideas?

Nikon just released a Firmware update today for the D750

When I check my boot SSD drive using Disk Utility under Mavericks, I often get "Incorrect number of extended attributes" errors. But if I boot off an external drive and check the same SSD, no errors are reported. Is this a bug in Mavericks?

When I check my boot SSD drive using Disk Utility under Mavericks, I often get "Incorrect number of extended attributes" errors. But if I boot off an external drive and check the same SSD, no errors are reported.
This happens not just with the SSD in my Mac Mini, but with another SSD in my MacBook (both now running Mavericks). So far as I know, all of the kit I am using is in good order (despite the file corruption reports). So I am beginning to wonder if it could be due to a bug in Mavericks? Both SSD drives have been formatted to MacOS Extended (journaled) format. Should I have used a different format, I wonder?
Has anyone else encountered this issue?
Does anyone have a solution?
Or an explanation that might help my investigation of the issue?
Thanks guys,

I understand that the Corsair Force 3 is not one of the SSD drives that are supported on Apple Macs.
I did try downloading and using Trim Enabler, but the error message came up both when it was off and when it was on.
I understand that not everyone thinks Trim Enabler is a good program, though there is a new version out now, so I may give it another try.

Can't repair Macintosh HD in Disk Utility (extended attributes)

Hi all,
I have a Retina Macbook Pro with one of them new fancy SSDs in it. I'm running 10.9.3 all up-to-date and am a bit computer-savvy, but I'm more than puzzled by what my Mac has been doing as of late.
When trying to install Windows via Bootcamp, I ran into an error message in the Partitioning step of the process. I hopped into Disk Utility, figuring I could simply partition from there (something in me trusts Disk Utility more than the Boot Camp Assistant). Partition failed!
I then executed the "Verify Disk" command in Disk Utility, only to be told I needed to restart from the Recovery Partition and use the "Repair Disk" function of Disk Utility then. Log of this whole event is at the end of this post, but the offending line seems to be
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: Checking extended attributes file.
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: (It should be 15783744 instead of 14437995)
I then restarted and followed these instructions. "Verify Disk" found no errors, nor did "Repair Disk." I rebooted, only to be met with the same problem!
Is there some sort of lower-level command I can use to repair my disk if I boot in Single User mode or something?
Thanks,
Nathan
2014-06-12 20:58:30 -0400: Disk Utility started.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Verifying partition map for “APPLE SSD SD512E Media”
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Starting verification tool:
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking prerequisites
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking the partition list
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking for an EFI system partition
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking the EFI system partition’s size
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking the EFI system partition’s file system
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking all HFS data partition loader spaces
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking booter partitions
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking booter partition disk0s3
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking file system
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking extents overflow file.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking catalog file.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking multi-linked files.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking catalog hierarchy.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking extended attributes file.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking volume bitmap.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking volume information.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: The volume Recovery HD appears to be OK.
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking Core Storage Physical Volume partitions
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking storage system
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking volume
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Volume Headers
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Disk Labels
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Logical Volume Group D79A3F82-3153-4DCC-A58F-C9B3ADAD2F6E on 1 device
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Metadata Volume
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Logical Volume Group has a 16 MB Metadata Volume with double redundancy
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Start scanning metadata for a valid checkpoint
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Segment Headers
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Checkpoint Payload
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Transaction Segment
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Incorporate 0 newer non-checkpoint transactions
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Virtual Address Table
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Segment Usage Table
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Metadata Superblock
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Logical Volumes B-Trees
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Logical Volume Group contains 1 Logical Volume
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify BDEE2B2F-6770-4707-AE0A-3862965E6414
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify B761A88F-B034-44A9-8F54-F7732861C825
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Freespace Summary
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Block Accounting
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Live Virtual Addresses
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Newest transaction commit checkpoint is valid
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Load and verify Segment Cleaning
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: The volume D79A3F82-3153-4DCC-A58F-C9B3ADAD2F6E appears to be OK
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: The partition map appears to be OK
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400:
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Verifying volume “Macintosh HD”
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Starting verification tool:
2014-06-12 20:58:36 -0400: Checking storage system
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Checking volume
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Volume Headers
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Disk Labels
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Logical Volume Group D79A3F82-3153-4DCC-A58F-C9B3ADAD2F6E on 1 device
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: disk0s2: Scan for Metadata Volume
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Logical Volume Group has a 16 MB Metadata Volume with double redundancy
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Start scanning metadata for a valid checkpoint
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Segment Headers
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Checkpoint Payload
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Transaction Segment
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Incorporate 0 newer non-checkpoint transactions
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Virtual Address Table
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Segment Usage Table
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Metadata Superblock
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Logical Volumes B-Trees
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Logical Volume Group contains 1 Logical Volume
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify BDEE2B2F-6770-4707-AE0A-3862965E6414
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify B761A88F-B034-44A9-8F54-F7732861C825
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Freespace Summary
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Block Accounting
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Live Virtual Addresses
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Newest transaction commit checkpoint is valid
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Load and verify Segment Cleaning
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: The volume D79A3F82-3153-4DCC-A58F-C9B3ADAD2F6E appears to be OK
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Checking file system
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Performing live verification.
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume.
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Checking extents overflow file.
2014-06-12 20:58:37 -0400: Checking catalog file.
2014-06-12 20:58:59 -0400: Checking multi-linked files.
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: Checking extended attributes file.
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: (It should be 15783744 instead of 14437995)
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: Error: This disk needs to be repaired using the Recovery HD. Restart your computer, holding down the Command key and the R key until you see the Apple logo. When the OS X Utilities window appears, choose Disk Utility.
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400:
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400: Disk Utility stopped verifying “Macintosh HD”: This disk needs to be repaired using the Recovery HD. Restart your computer, holding down the Command key and the R key until you see the Apple logo. When the OS X Utilities window appears, choose Disk Utility.
2014-06-12 20:59:30 -0400:

I'm having a similar problem with my G4 Desktop.
I have a 2nd internal hard drive and 2 FW Drives.
None of them are able to be verified or repaired using DU.
I get the following message: "Verify volume failed with error Could not unmount disk." And then some message about "make sure that all your files are closed."
I tried soft-booting by holding the shift-key down just as a trouble-shooting idea and I was able to verify and the drives were working well. However, when I restarted in normal mode I was not able to verify or repair.
What is my G4's problem? Why does it need to use that secondary drive in order to operate? What do I need to do to fix it?
Any suggestions?
G4 Dual 1.42 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 1 Gig Ram / 2 Internal Hard Drives

No permission to copy file (to NAS with AFP support) - extended attributes?

For certain files that I copy from one of my drives to the NAS here (Synology 206j), ever since upgrading to Snow Leopard, Finder's behaviour has changed. It will simply refuse to copy the file, stating that "The operation can’t be completed because you don’t have permission to access some of the items."
The source is an external USB drive in Mac OS Extended format, I do have full permissions on the files and in any case the drive is set to ignore ownership.
The target is, like most NASes, in EXT3 format. It's sharing via its own AFP implementation.
I'd have tried repairing permissions, but for whatever reason, it's greyed out on my external drives. Since then I've figured that it was probably not that anyway, which will become apparent:
I tried copying the file via the terminal and it actually worked, but also gave an error: "cp: myfile: could not copy extended attributes to /Volumes/media backup/myfile: Operation not permitted"
This suggests to me that, as expected, the target volume doesn't support extended attributes. But rather than popping up with the message that Leopard did (something along the lines of "your target volume doesn't support extended attributes so your file's metadata may be lost, do you wish to continue") it just aborts instead.
I'm not sure if this is a Snow Leopard problem or a change that Synology need to catch up with. A workaround is to compress the file to ZIP first.
Thought I'd mention it here before trying to report it as a bug somewhere. Anyone else having similar issues, either with a NAS or some other storage, in which case please specify?
Message was edited by: Cloudane

Thanks guys, yeah I've been monitoring the netatalk mailing list myself: they're onto the same problem, have come to the same conclusions about it being Extended Attributes and have much better proof of such than I
It looks like they're currently debating the best way to fix it (pretending to support EAs but sending them to a black hole being the quick and dirty way, but I suspect they'll go for implementation)
It'll be a while for sure, but the Synology guys are very good with Mac support so I'm sure they'll apply the update fairly quickly once the netatalk crew get something public. FWIW, I did detect a certain sense of urgency from the netatalk discussions.
Although it's essentially answered, I'll leave the question marked as unanswered in case Apple come up with a better one
Message was edited by: Cloudane

How to use extends attribute in jsp page directive

Can anybody tell how to extend a existing .jsp file from another .jsp file. I have tried but it gives error.
I have used Extends attribute of page directive as below:
<%@ page extends = "MyAnotherJsp.jsp"%>
I also tried : <%@ page extends = "MyAnotherJsp"%>
I am using Tomcat as a web server
Also tell where to put those files.
Thanks.

Hi I am using Netbeans 5.5, Sun Java System Application Server 9.
ABC.java
package javapackage;
public class ABC{
public String show(){
return "Sandip Gaikwad";
index.jsp
<%@ page extends="javapackage.ABC" %>
<html>
<head>
<title>JSP Page</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>JSP Page </h1>
</body>
</html>
Above code throws following exception at runtime:-
HTTP Status 500 -
type Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
Generated servlet error:
[javac] F:\Sun\AppServer\domains\domain1\generated\jsp\j2ee-modules\Page_Extends_Attribute_Example\org\apache\jsp\index_jsp.java:36: getPageContext(javax.servlet.Servlet,javax.servlet.ServletRequest,javax.servlet.ServletResponse,java.lang.String,boolean,int,boolean) in javax.servlet.jsp.JspFactory cannot be applied to (org.apache.jsp.index_jsp,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse,,boolean,int,boolean)
[javac] pageContext = _jspxFactory.getPageContext(this, request, response,
[javac] ^
[javac] 1 error
Server log
StandardWrapperValve[jsp]: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
Generated servlet error:
[javac] F:\Sun\AppServer\domains\domain1\generated\jsp\j2ee-modules\Page_Extends_Attribute_Example\org\apache\jsp\index_jsp.java:36: getPageContext(javax.servlet.Servlet,javax.servlet.ServletRequest,javax.servlet.ServletResponse,java.lang.String,boolean,int,boolean) in javax.servlet.jsp.JspFactory cannot be applied to (org.apache.jsp.index_jsp,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse,<nulltype>,boolean,int,boolean)
[javac] pageContext = _jspxFactory.getPageContext(this, request, response,
[javac] ^
[javac] 1 error
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandler.java:94)
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java:384)
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.generateClass(Compiler.java:461)
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:528)
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:507)
at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:495)
at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:530)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:324)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:412)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:318)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.servletService(ApplicationFilterChain.java:397)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:278)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:566)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:536)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:240)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:179)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:566)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.WebPipeline.invoke(WebPipeline.java:73)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:182)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:566)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.VirtualServerPipeline.invoke(VirtualServerPipeline.java:120)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:939)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:137)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:566)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:536)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:939)
at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:239)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ProcessorTask.invokeAdapter(ProcessorTask.java:667)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ProcessorTask.processNonBlocked(ProcessorTask.java:574)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ProcessorTask.process(ProcessorTask.java:844)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ReadTask.executeProcessorTask(ReadTask.java:287)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ReadTask.doTask(ReadTask.java:212)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.TaskBase.run(TaskBase.java:252)
at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:75)
If I delete the line <%@ extends="javapackage.ABC"%> it works fine. Please tell me what is wrong with this line.

Display non extended attribute in a Custom Report

Hi,
Is it possible to query external attributes (that are not set as extended attributes) in a user report ?
I read in this forum that reports are just meant to query IDM repository, is it still true ?
Thanks,
Ben

Hello Sandra,
Thanks for your reply, but eventhen it fails to load the pdf. Is ADS required to be installed for this?
Can I just pass the pdf_fsize imported from CONVERT_OTF which is of type i.
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERT_OTF'
    EXPORTING
      FORMAT                = 'PDF'
    IMPORTING
      BIN_FILESIZE          = PDF_FSIZE
bin_file              = pdfxstring
    TABLES
      OTF                   = L_JOB_OUTPUT_INFO-OTFDATA
      LINES                 = LT_PDF
    EXCEPTIONS
      ERR_MAX_LINEWIDTH     = 1
      ERR_FORMAT            = 2
      ERR_CONV_NOT_POSSIBLE = 3
      OTHERS                = 4.
CALL METHOD G_HTML_CONTROL->LOAD_DATA(
     EXPORTING
       TYPE         = 'application' "'text' " 'application'
       SUBTYPE      = 'pdf' "'html' "'pdf'
       size           = PDF_FSIZE
     IMPORTING
       ASSIGNED_URL         = lv_URL
     CHANGING
       DATA_TABLE           = LT_DATA "i_html "LT_DATA
     EXCEPTIONS
       DP_INVALID_PARAMETER = 1
       DP_ERROR_GENERAL     = 2
       CNTL_ERROR           = 3
       OTHERS               = 4 ).
Thanks,
Jaya.

To change the approval limit for Extended attribute PO Value limits

Hi,
We are on SRM 4.0, in PPOMA_BBP for a local purchasing organisation we want to change the approval limit let us say from 100 to 50 but the system is presenting this field as non editable( In stabdard values sub screen)
In Extended attribute tab in organisation structure after selecting the PO Value limits in SRM 4.0 we see two sub screens
a) Standard values
b) Local values
We want to change the approval limit in standard values sub screen from 1000 to 500, which system is presenting as noneditable.
Regrds
Vivek

Hi
Refer these links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5a/af5efc85d011d2b42d006094b92d37/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8b/4fa9585db211d2b404006094b92d37/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fa/fa7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/7f/0fea380bfe6161e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Incase it does not helps, pls let me know.
Regards
- Atul

I don't find User Extended attributes in IDM 8

Hi all,
I have installed idm8 and I need to extend the user attributes, but I can't find the User Extended Attributes object (or Extended User Attributes). Can anyone help me?

From the release notes :
Identity Manager 8.0 consolidates the locations where an administrator specifies extended,
queryable, and summary attributes for user objects into the new
IDM Schema Configuration object. (ID-17784) In prior versions of Identity Manager, an administrator
edited the User Extended Attributes configuration object to add extended attributes for
user objects and the UserUIConfig configuration object to specify additional queryable or
summary attributes for user objects. An administrator now edits the IDM Schema Configuration
object for these purposes.

Resource Attributes not saving in Queriable User Extended Attributes

Howdy,
I added a few queriable user extended attributes to IDM. I originally added them in through the configure user attributes interface. I then edited the UserUIConfig to specify that they were queryable. I then edited the User Search Defaults form's getSearchableAttrs function to include these attributes. My added attributes now show up in the search user form, etc., just like I expected them to. Next I configured a new resource adapter for a database table that contained some values I wanted to use to populate these queriable attributes. I wrote a correlation rule, and ran reconciliation on the new resource. It matched up the account entries and automatically matched and linked the account information. So far so good. However, the user extended attributes I defined are not getting populated with the data from the new resource. The mapped resource attributes are treated as part of the user view, but only under the given resource, not as a queriable attribute. I really want to be able to use the find user interface with these datafields. Does anyone know why my data is ot making it into the queriable fields? Do I need to write another rule or workflow? Any advice would be most helpful.
Thanks!
Jim

Queryable attributes refer to attributes stored in the IDM user object, and so need to be referenced as such.
If you want attribute 'foo' in resource 'bar' to be stored as a Queryable attribute, you need to define it like so in your User Form :
<Field name='accounts[Lighthouse].foo'>
    <Expansion>
          <ref>accounts[bar].foo</ref>
    </Expansion>
</Field>This should pull the value from the resource attribute and put it in the IDM attribute. If you refer to it as a global.foo everywhere, that might work (but I find globals to be problematic).
Let me know if it works...
Jason

Plant disappears in extended attributes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for