Plant not taken in PO

hi ,
i have got an error enter plant in PO,while i creating a PO for flag for deletion (partially).i entered all
values,but it doesnot take the plant at item level.eventhough i entered specific plant for that one.but i
successfully finished flag for deletion (fully) for that same plant.so anyone kindly put an eye to solve this
issue as earliest. points will be rewarded.
regards
rakhi

ok as u said i put check for material in MM06.upto this we r through.i got message flag for deletion fully.
my problem is while i check only for plant irrespective of material in MM06 iam unable to get message
material deletion partially in PO.
regards
rakhi

Similar Messages

CK11N Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
"The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
Regards, and waiting for any solution.
Yolanda.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Profit Center is not taken from Material Master

Dear all,
When we post material-related items from SD or MM with link to material/plant (as additional account assginment) then Profit Center is taken from Material Master. But when I manually (FB01 or even FBR2) post similar item with link to material/plant (as additional account assginment) then Profit Center is not taken from Material Master.
Why this happen? How to fix it? We need to derive Profit Centers from Material Master for items that have links to material and posted via FI.

>
Jigar Thakkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It will also take effect in FI, as we have defined the same. Status will be 3 (Other transactions + cross-company (orders + billing doc.) for Subsitution in T code 0KEL
>
> Regards,
> Jigar
Just checked this. It's not worked. This subst. not even called (I've checked w/ active Trace).
So, the question is still open. How to derive PCtr from material in manual FI (FB01, FBR2) transactions.

Stock transfter Sch. Agreement not taken for Planning

Dear Experts
My scenario is like this,
I have two plants A and B. I will be creating Stock transfer Purchase order at B and the material will be sent from A to B thro' STO process.
When i create Stock Transfer Purchase order thro' ME21N at B,
I am able to see the requirement in MD04 at plant A.
But when I create a Stock Transport Scheduling agreement by ME37.
I am not able to see that in my Stock requirements list and it is not taken for MRP run also.
My requirement is when i create a stock transport sch. agreement, the system should show it in MD04 at Plant A and it should be included in the MRP.
Please tell me what settings need to be done.
Thanks & Regards
Bala
Whereas when i create Stock Transfer Purchase Order,

Dear,
Check your delivery schedule line dates, if you have maintained in future then it will not allow to create the delivery.
Also check your scheduling agreement is released document.
Did you maintain the MRP data in the material master for this mateiral and special procurement key needs to be maintained for this mateiral in MRP 2 view (from plant)?
Normal process from One Plant to Aonther Plant
1 Go to ME31 enter the supplying Plant and other details
.2 In the next scree enter material ,qty and save
STO no is created
3. Use MB1B enter the movement type : 351 and enter all the details and save. Send the material to the other plant with documents
4. Receive the material in the othe plant in Mov 101
5. use MB5T to see the material -STOCK in transit
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

New values not taken into account in MASS / XD99

I am trying to use a background job to block Customers for Billing at month end.
In MASS/XD99 I created a variant to update field KNVV-FAKSD (Sales Area Billing Block).
But running the variant in background (using MASSBACK), it seems the new values I thought I saved in the variant in MASS/XD99 are not taken into account.
I opened the variant again in MASS/XD99 and indeed it seems it had not saved the new values, because the screen again shows the current values.
Tried a couple of times again, but everytime I open the variant I have saved again, the new values revert back to 'current values'.
Is this the reason MASSBACK is also making no updates? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for your comments & advice.

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Index not taken into account

Dear experts,
I have the following problem. Even though table VEPO has the necessary index (by unvel), it is not taken into account in my select statement:
        SELECT SINGLE *
          INTO wa_vepo_line
          FROM *vepo
         WHERE unvel = wa_vepo_line-venum .
the index is standard and is called : A : Selection by subordinate shipping unit and it is certainly activated.
What might be wrong?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Roxani

hi
the system picks up the primary keys or index at the runtime...it is not possible to find out which one it will pick!
try to add vepos in ur where condition.
avoid select * . specify the required fields IF possible..
regards,
madhu

Complaint wth ref. to invoice in CRM - Copy control not taken into account!

Hi all,
We are facing problems when replicating return orders (business object Complaint) with reference to invoices in ERP.
The copy control in ERP is not taken into account. Does anyone know if it is possible to check the copy control when replicating the complaint to ERP with reference to the invoice?
The return order is being replicated correctly and the link to the invoice is shown (so, the flow is correct).
But:
1.- The manual pricing conditions in the invoice in ERP are not being copied in the return order.
2.- Some data as the 'Incoterms' is being redetermined from the customer master data and is not being copied from the invoice.
3.- Data related to material is also being redetermined when the order is replicated
The copy control is not being taken into account and we can replicate return orders from CRM to ERP with reference to invoices for which the copy control is not maintained in ERP...
Please help...
Thanks in advance!
Yolanda

Try something like this, in place of ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'ZZDEP2PVNDPGM'..
ls_input_field_names-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_input_field_names-ref_handle = '100'.
insert ls_input_field_names into table lt_input_field_names.
Edited by: Kevin Alcock on Aug 10, 2009 4:03 PM

WebLogic 11g: Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account

Hello,
I'm trying to set up Production Redeployment on my EAR, under WebLogic 10.3.6.
However, I can't figure out how to make Weblogic-Application-Version work in MANIFEST.MF
Here is my EAR structure:
MyApplication
--- APP-INF
--- --- lib
--- --- classes
--- META-INF
--- --- application.xml
--- --- weblogic-application.xml
--- --- MANIFEST.MF <- file I update
--- WebApp1
--- --- META-INF
--- --- --- MANIFEST.MF
--- --- WEB-INF
--- --- --- classes
--- --- --- lib
--- --- --- web.xml
--- --- --- weblogic.xml
--- WebApp2
--- --- same as WebApp1
MANIFEST.MF content is the following:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1
The problem is that it's not taken into account when I deploy the application in the WebLogic console.
When I use staged mode, the line Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1 is removed from the staged MANIFEST.MF file.
The only way to manage to version my application is to add the flag -appversion to weblogic.Deployer, but I don't want to use that on a Production environment (and it's not recommended in the documentation!).
Any idea why Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account? I tried to add debug mode to node weblogic/debug but with no success.
Thanks by advance,
Julien

I tested it at my end and was able to redeploy it successfully with the application versions.
Are you saying that by deploying through weblogic console,the archive version is not honoring/getting picked up .is that correct?
if yes, what does your weblogic console shows for archive version,when you first try to deploy your application with the VERSION_1.
I mean,when you are on the "Optional Settings" Page.Do you see the Archive Version as VERSION_1?
Deployments >> Click on the Install >> select your application ( MyAPP)>> Install this deployment as an application >> Select deployment targets >> Optional Settngs
Example from the Optional settings Page for My application
What do you want to name this deployment?
Name: MyAPP
Archive Version:
VERSION_1
This can confirm that the application being deployed is versioned one and if it doesn't shows up,then you need to check why its not getting picked up.?
Moreover,You can enable the "deploy" debug flag to see whats going wrong in your case during the deployment process
Server > Debug > Weblogic > Deploy
Do refer the below viewlet on the Production Redeployment
http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/wls/redeployment/wls-side-by-side-non-annotation_viewlet_swf.html

How do I add photos to the camera roll that were not taken on my iPad? I imported photos to my iPad from my camera, and now I want to add them to my camera roll which is sync'ed with Dropbox as a back up mechanism.

How do I add photos to my camera roll that were not taken one my iPad? I have iMported photos from my camera to my iPad. Theses photos are in the imported photo album. I want to move these photos to my camera roll but can't figure out how to this. I want them in my camera roll because that is the album that syncs with Dropbox where I want to backup my photos. Thank you for your help.

Consider using sshfs to mount your Pi from your Linux boxes. It's much easier to configure and manage than samba. It sounds like you already have your Windows machines mounting your Pi so Samba is doing its job in that respect.
More info on sshfs in the Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sshfs
To help get you off the dime, here's a modified line from my fstab that I use to mount my Pi with:
gav@PI:/mnt/backup /mnt/rpi/backup fuse.sshfs rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other 0 0
Subsitute my mount points with yours.
For a password-less mount:
ssh-copy-id gav@PI
after you've set up ssh and generated some keys on your client box.
Here are some relevant lines from the smb.conf file on my Pi that I use for my one Windows box in the house that might help you with your write permissions:
security = user
hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
guest account = gav
; And my share setup:
[rpi]
comment = Public Stuff
path = /mnt
writable = yes
; printable = no
; write list = @krb
[torrent_dl]
path = /mnt/video/torrent_dl
writable = yes
create mask = 0770
directory mask = 0770
guest ok = Yes
case sensitive = No
read only = No
Hope this helps.

Plant not updated in ABUMN

Hi,
While am doing Plant to plant asset transfer ABUMN , Plant not updated in FI Document .Send asset am giving 0001 and receiving Plant 002. both plant same cost center. but plant not updated in FI document .
Thanks
SV

Hi SV,
Once you create the new internal with the specified valid from and valid to, the time-dependent data valid for the date of the request is displayed.
After new time interval defined the data would reflect based on the new plant assignment.
If the assignment is different in other time periods, this is designated by a history indicator after the field.
You can display the entires using filed breakdown function.
Time-Dependent Data - Asset Accounting (FI-AA) - SAP Library
Hope this helps...
Ajay

In SOLUTION MANAGER, the thresholds for log attrib are not taken in account

Im using a SAP SOLUTION MANAGER to monitor any satellites systems.
In this case, I have a problem with the monitoring of BDoc messages for a satellite.
Im declaring some threshold for BDocs in error status and anothers thresholds for BDocs in waiting for response in SOLMAN.
Unfortunately, the thresholds are not taken in account.
Here, you should find the threshold in the setup monitoring:
      green to yellow: 10
      yellow to green:   11
      red to yellow:       9
      yellow to green:   8
When I have only 2 errors in the satellite system and 1 entrie in Waiting status ,I have 2 red alerts in SOLMAN. It is not correct because my thresholds in SOLMAN are greater than this values.
unfortunately thresholds are only considered for performance attributes
(see legend in the monitoring setup). For all other MTE types in CCMS
the tresholds are not considered. The BDoc MTEs that I have used
in my example is a log attribute.
Please, someone could you help me to solve this problem or indicate me how to correct this problem with another tips?
best regards
cesario

Sorry, but what you say is not a good idea, since it would mean changing a standard object. But what I posted is ok, using a redefinition of the method GET_DQUERY_VALUEHELPS works perfectly well for the need.
Regards,
Xavier

Precompiled JSP not taken in account by Weblogic 10.3.1

Hi
My JSPs are properly precompiled in my ear, and well taken in account by weblogic when I work with my local environment. But if I upload my ear on the Unix server, they're not taken in account anymore. Weblogic compiles them in real time, that causes a display time really long for each page.
The precompiled JSP are present in the folder WEB-INF/classes/jsp_servlet/_jsp , inside the file app-web.war, itself included in the ear.
Once the ear is deployed on the server, I find my precompiled JSP at 2 places :
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/rdi76c/war/WEB-INF/lib/_wl_cls_gen.jar
then in jsp_servlet/_jsp
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/m8l8j8/app-web.war
then in WEB-INF\classes\jsp_servlet\_jsp\
At the execution time, Weblogic should be able to find the precompiled JSP at that 2 places. However, it recompiles the JSPs and places them here :
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/rdi76c/jsp_servlet/_jsp
I have already checked the dates. The dates written in the generated .java files match the system dates of the corresponding JSP files. It could have been an explanation, but it's not.
Do you have any idea ?

but encounter version mismatching error... It indicated that it only support 10.3.0... It's hard to tell based on your description, but I am going to guess that you are not selecting the right version of WLS runtime in the new runtime wizard. WLS 10.3.1 is also known as WLS 11gR1. Make sure that you look for it in Oracle rather than BEA category.
- Konstantin

How do I transfer photos from iPad (not taken on iPad) to my MacBook Pro?

How do I transfer photos from Ipad (not taken on iPad) to my MacBook Pro?

You can use 3rd party apps like Photo Transfer App.
https://itunes.apple.com/sg/app/photo-transfer-app/id365152940?mt=8

Is it possible to put the photos on my iPhone 5 onto my MacBook Pro? The photos that I am trying to do this with we're not taken from the phone. They were imported from a computer.

Is it possible to put the photos on my iPhone 5 onto my MacBook Pro? The photos that I am trying to do this with we're not taken from the phone. They were imported from a computer. When I open image capture it only shows the photos that were taken from my phone and not the other ones. Please help. Thanks.

It is not possible to put synched photos on your iPhone from one computer into another.

Plant not taken in PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for