Platform Support for WLS 5.1 SP9 and / or WLS 6.x

When will BEA support WLPS with either WLS 5.1 SP9 or WLS 6.x?

Should have been more specific:
When will BEA support WLPS __3.2__ with either WLS 5.1 SP9 or WLS 6.x? The
docs say it currently only supports WLS 5.1 sp6/sp8, depending on platform.
Are there plans for BEA to support WLPS __3.5__ with WLS 5.1 SP9? The doc
says it currently only supports WLS 6.x
Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
>
When will BEA support WLPS with either WLS 5.1 SP9 or WLS 6.x?

Similar Messages

BDB support for Windows Vista, WIndows 7 and Windows Server?

Hello,
I examine to use BDB on Windows, and I have a question.
There's a description about supported OSs on the BDB reference guide as follows;
Where does Berkeley DB run?
The Berkeley DB distribution includes support for Windows/95, Windows/98, Windows/NT, Windows/2000 and Windows/XP, via the Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 and .NET development environments.
Does BDB distribution supports for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2003?
And it will support Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7?
I believe that BDB does not depend on specific function of Windows, thus there's no problem to support them...
Regards,
Akira

Yes, we have a plan about BDB support for Windows Vista, Windows 7 and Windows Server. Once we are ready, we'll let you know here.
Hi Vit,
For Berkeley DB XML questions, please go to the Berkeley DB XML forum at: Berkeley DB XML
By the way, I learnt there's a XP-compatible mode in Windows 7. You may want to try DB-XML with that.
Best regards,
Chao Huang
Oracle Berkeley DB

IWeb protocol support for anything OTHER than http and https

I am extremely disappointed in iWeb. It doesn't even seem to be able to do very simple things.
All I want to do is to create HTML links to external pages with protocols other than "http" and "https" and it always prepends "http" to the beginning of the URL. This is really really really annoying.
Apple I hope you are paying attention. iWeb is poorly designed. You are trying to anticipate what end users want...this is a development practice right from the Microsoft Windows Developer book. I sure how the next update to iWeb works properly. I'm so upset about all this...I can't publish podcasts to the web because of all the foolishness with how you handle that, and the confusing directory name issues.
My podcast URL looks like this:
http://itpc://www.mysite.com/podcast/News/rss.xml
I tried (unsuccesfully) to manually create the podcast since the automated version created this:
itpc://www.bradyconsult.com/podcast/podcast/News/rss.xml
I'm sure I could fiddle with iWEb and get this to work, but why should I? I've already fiddled with it and simple changes to my site structure totally screw this up. Not to mention, that when it did work, it didn' t even post all my podcasts!!! It skipped the first one and the last one.
And, for those wondering, i'm not technically clueless. I have a podcast working just fine on two other sites. The appeal to iLife with iWeb and the new podcast feature of GarageBand was to bring all this together in one easy to use, nice package. But it's not nice. Garageband's update is awesome! But iWeb and it's attempts to work with the other iApps is gruesome.
I expect this garbage from Microsoft...not Apple.
Can anyone recommend a workaround (and yes, I understand I can manually edit HTML...but I was hoping for a workaround within iWeb) to create html links with support for protocols (aside from http and https) ??
It's bad enough I have to publish to a folder and then FTP to my site since apple makes that exceedingly difficult to do (I'm sure to increase .mac sales) but all this other foolishness is just bunk. I feel ripped off on my iLife '06 purchase.
Grrrrrrr......
G5 Dual 2.3 GHz Mac OS X (10.4.5)

I don't know if this helps you any, but in my humble
opinion Drake is absolutely correct. iWeb really
wasn't designed for the pro site builder; it's just
an entry level site builder. Moreover, it isn't
really geared for the professional world of internet
marketing; I think it is really more for the home
and family group who have at least one thing in
common: Macs.
I don't think it was even designed for them. I mean, you can't create an ftp: link, you can't manage multiple site files, there's no way to add "aim:" or "yahoo:" links, etc. It's not mac's they're supporting. It's .mac in particular, maybe, if that.
The art is kinda nice, but really, the grief in trying to do simple things like a basic href is just absurd. I can do these things easily in Pages. iWeb should certainly be no more difficult.
Btw, I'm here because I have the same problem - overly restrictive URL's on hyperlinks. I'll probably solve my with a trivial sed script. But even that's tough because they mangle the url. It's not easy to find an encoding suitable for automatic post processing.
Automator anyone?

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh - why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned for the future?

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh - why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned for the future?

http://apple.com/feedback
-Make your suggestion there so the right people see it.

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh -why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned in the future?

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh - why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned for the future?

Since we are all fellow users on here, not much we can offer in the way of a reliable answer...you might try letting Apple know your needs:
http://www.apple.com/feedback
If enough people make their needs known, Apple may do something as you suggest.

New Platform Support for ColdFusion 10 and ColdFusion Builder 2.0.1: Windows 8 and Windows 2012 Serv

Microsoft Windows 8 and Microsoft Windows 2012 server are now supported platforms for ColdFusion 10. The new Windows installers are available for download to all retail and licensing customers as well on the trials download page.
The ColdFusion Builder 2.0.1 installers have also been updated to support Windows 8. The existing MAC OS X installer for ColdFusion Builder 2.0.1 has also been certified to now support MAC OS X 10.8.
Refer this technote for more details about the support.

@Adam @CarlV
>what's the version number when you dump the server scope?
ColdFusion Server - Evaluation 10,0,8,284032
OK I see, the I button reports differently to Settings Summary.
About ColdFusion »
System Information
Server Details
Server Product ColdFusion
Version 10,0,8,284032
Tomcat Version 7.0.23.0
Edition Enterprise (Trial)
Serial Number
Operating System Windows Server 2012
OS Version 6.2
Update Level /D:/ColdFusion10/cfusion/lib/updates/chf10000008.jar
Server Settings > Settings Summary
System Information
Server Details
Server Product ColdFusion
Version ColdFusion 10,284032
Edition Enterprise (Trial)
Operating System Windows Server 2012
OS Version 6.2
Update Level /D:/ColdFusion10/cfusion/lib/updates/chf10000008.jar
Adobe Driver Version 4.1 (Build 0001)
Regards Carl M.

Platform support for OMW

Hi All,
I have few questions on the certification status of OMW.
1. Can the source database be on any OS or only on windows/linux 3.0 ?
2. Are the supported target DB operating system are windows and linux 3.0 only?
Also can you pl send the "Database Migration Estimation Spreadsheet" applicable for all types of source DB.
my email ID: [email protected]
Regards
vara

Vara,
The source database can be on any platform. We can either access it directly via JDBC or via DSML.
Target Oracle , is any supported Oracle platform.
For the spreadsheet, I'd suggest you talk with your NAIO colleagues (Kartik Krishnamurti)
Donal

Is AIX7.1 and MS Windows 2012 supported for JavaCAPS5.1.3 R4 and JavaCAPS 6.3?

Does AIX 7.1 and MS-WIndows 2012(and cluster) supported for JavaCAPS5.1.3 R4 or JavaCAPS 6.3?

John provides another possible workaround for your issues :
http://www.metavero.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=44:making-ie8-work-on-hyperion-11x&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=50
My situation is slightly different. We are upgrading to most recent version of Hyperion in 2012 and are not looking to apply service packs/updates to 9.3.1 in the mean time; however, we needed IE 8. We performed the javascript fixes and our users are able to perform their work just fine.
I would also agree that XP mode is not that answer.
Another option would be to install IETester as it lets you 'convert' your IE browser to be compatible with previous versions.... http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage
Finally, you could have users use Firefox browser as that seems to work; however, it does SOME things differently than IE so you might get some complaints about that.

BlackBerry Enterprise Cloud Services - MS Exchange Online Plan 2 - Support for Legacy 7.1 Devices and Costs?

Hello.
All questions below relate to the MS Exchange Online Plan 2, and BlackBerry Enterprise Cloud Services (BBCS).
- How much does it cost to install the BBCS service?
- Is there support for legacy 7.1 BlackBerry devices?
I have searched online for these answers but I've been unsuccessful answering these two questions. I'm aware that BBCS is available
for the Exchange Online Plan 2 but I cannot confirm if there is a fee. Likewise, I've been unable to find out if legacy 7.1 OS BlackBerry devices are support on BBCS.
Many thanks.

I recommend that you post this in the Exchange Online (Office 365) Forum:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/onlineservicesexchange/threads
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Question on Support for XML in Oracle 9i and XDK 9.0.1

Hi All,
I just went through the Oracle 9i's features for XML. I have been working with Oracle's XDK too. I noticed that there are some new packages in Oracle 9i like SYS_XMLGEN and DBMS_XMLGEN that produce a XML file when presented a query to it. This feature is there in the XDK (XML SQL Utility) too. So, my question is as follows:
1. Are there any differences in the XML File produced by XDK and these database packages?
2. What are the scenerios when I should go for these packages and when should I go for the XSQL Utility.
Cos I found out that both are doing effectively the same things. Is there any difference between them? Please explain the second question.
Thanks in advance,
Rajat

The sys_xmlagg and sys_xmlgen are native implementations of functionality tied into the database code line. They replicate some of the functionality that was previously provided in a 'plugin' form by the XDK. DBMS_XMLGEN is a PLSQL Package that also provides access to native implimentations of some of this functionalitu. You should find that as a result of being native implimentation they are much more performant.
SYS_XMLGEN and SYS_XMLAGG allow XML to be generated directly from a SQL Query. DBMS_XMLGEN is designed for use in procedural processing and provides a finer grain of control over the generated output.
There are still some features, such as DTD and Schema generation that are not (yet) available with the native implementation, and for this reason, and backwards compatability the XDK functionality is still available
As a rules of thumb, if you can use the native implimentations do so, as performance should be much better.
Mark D. Drake
Senior Product Manager,
XML Infrastructure,
Server Technology

Running BOE XI 2.0 reports on BOE XI 3.0 and platform support for BOE XI 3.

Hi,
I have recently purchased BOE Pro (for Ent Reporting) XI 3.0
Can you please tell me if crystal reports that have been running on BOE XI 2.0 will also run on BOE Pro (for Ent Reporting) XI 3.0
Can you also please tell me if BOE Pro (for Ent Reporting) XI 3.0 will run on AIX 5L v5.3
Thanks.

You're welcome...
> Thanks for your views. Actually, we do currently use
> a lot of ABAP proxies for XI 2.0 interfaces - the
> complexity of the mappings required meant a lot of
> the IDoc creation originally was ABAP'd in these
> proxies.
I agree. I often use proxies for the same reason.
> However, we do not intend to use proxies for
> XI 3.0. We are intending all inbound IDocs to be
> posted directly via IDoc XML through XI. Would you
> think that this remains feasible?
I think so. As you probably know, each R/3 using ABAP prx has a stronger connection to XI compared to an R/3 using IDoc or RFC. It has to access SLD, repository, and so on...
So if you have this R/3-XI link always with your 2.0 you shouldn't be messin up.
> On the maintenance side, it seems to us that XI 2.0
> is anything but stable! We spend a lot of time
> applying patches to AIX, microcodes, J2EE engine etc
> etc and have persistent memory issues for not really
> that much data. We are hoping with a properly sized
> XI 3.0 that the issues will reduce not increase
Yep, I know. My "almost everything fixed" was volountarily ironical
XI 3.0 works much better... though it has its issues as well.
Regards,
Alex
> Stuart

Platform supported for ebiz contol center client?????

Hello,
I happened to read an article from bea website on BEA WEblogic Portal 4.0 review.
.There is a mention that in the current version of portal 4.0, ebiz control center
client is avaliable for windows 2000 systems only ??Is it true or is ebusiness control
center client available on other oprating systems ??

I have ebcc on linux. The main thing that you will have to change is the jvm. This
will probably void your warranty though :-). Basically, what we did here, was install
it on solaris. Move the whole thing to linux. Remove the ebcc jvm directory. Then,
make a soft link to the installed jdk.
-Travis
"Michel Bisson" <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel,
Technically speaking you are right but we only tested (actually certified)
the platforms below. For instance, we have not tested/verified the scripts
for launching EBCC on all Unix platforms.
Michel.
"Daniel Selman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Michel,
But it is 100% Java... ;-)
Sincerely,
Daniel Selman
"Michel Bisson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3cc59b18$[email protected]..
Sanjay,
EBCC is supported on Windows 2000, Windows NT 4.0, and Solaris 8.
The info is avalaible at:
http://edocs.bea.com/wlp/docs40/install/platforms.htm
Michel
"Sanjay Phadke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3cc4ed40$[email protected]..
Hello,
I happened to read an article from bea website on BEA WEblogic Portal
4.0
review.
.There is a mention that in the current version of portal 4.0, ebizcontrol center
client is avaliable for windows 2000 systems only ??Is it true or
is
ebusiness control
center client available on other oprating systems ??

WLS 5.1 sp9 and ACL exception! Urgent!

Hi:
My applcation runs correctly on sp8.
Now even some of my jsp cannot run correctly with sp9. It also
compliants security exception. But strangely the first time WLS compiles
the
jsp, it can run correctly, the data is shown in the browser. But once
the
jsp is compiled, all subsequent call of this jsp will resort to
assertion
error.
Funny, seems the reason is that WLS sp9 changes the steteful beans
security checking. Previously the checking seems to be when the home is
obtained, now the checking seems to be in the time only the method is
called.
I am uisng bean home cache. Is it the cause of this error? I can get
around this by giving the jndi to guest, but it is not what i want. I
still
want to protect my beans jndi.
I need the solution urgently. Otherwise i have to roll back to sp8.
Thanks.
minjiang
See the stack trace below:
Mon Jul 02 16:36:58 SGT 2001:<I> <EJB JAR deployment
d:/weblogic/myserver/kbf_de
ploy/ordermgr.jar> Transaction: '994062053580_3435' rolled back due to
EJB
excep
tion:
javax.naming.NoPermissionException: User guest does not have lookup
permission
on kbf
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.NamingSecurityManagerImpl.checkPermission(Nami
ngSecurityManagerImpl.java:100)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.NamingSecurityManagerImpl.checkLookup(NamingSe
curityManagerImpl.java:45)
at
weblogic.jndi.toolkit.BasicWLContext.resolveName(BasicWLContext.java:
737)
at
weblogic.jndi.toolkit.BasicWLContext.lookup(BasicWLContext.java:133)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:354)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.wrapEJBObject(StatefulEJBHome.j
ava:170)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.findOrCreateEJBObject(StatefulE
JBHome.java:275)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.findOrCreateEJBObject(StatefulE
JBHome.java:258)
at
com.kbf.ejb.order.OrderBeanHomeImpl.findByPrimaryKey(OrderBeanHomeImp
l.java:98)
at
com.kbf.ejb.order.OrderBeanHomeImpl_ServiceStub.findByPrimaryKey(Orde
rBeanHomeImpl_ServiceStub.java:262)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBean.getOrders(OrderManagerBean.java
:695)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBeanEOImpl.getOrders(OrderManagerBea
nEOImpl.java:872)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBeanEOImpl_ServiceStub.getOrders(Ord
erManagerBeanEOImpl_ServiceStub.java:311)
at
com.kbf.webremotemgr.WebRemoteMgr.getOrders(WebRemoteMgr.java:1500)
at jsp_servlet._orderview._jspService(_orderview.java:349)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubIm
pl.java:120)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(ServletCon
textImpl.java:915)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(ServletCon
textImpl.java:879)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextManager.invokeServlet(Servlet
ContextManager.java:269)
at
weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.invokeServlet(MuxableSocketHTTP.jav
a:365)
at
weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.execute(MuxableSocketHTTP.java:253)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:129)

Actually this is wrong. The "guest" prompts me to type in the "system"
credentials, before it can run everyting correctly.
So i must still miss out something.
Can anybody help me solve this?
mj
minjiang wrote:
Hi:
After i set this, it works for my jsp.
weblogic.allow.execute.weblogic.servlet=guest
Previously it is =everyone.
So can anyone tell me what the difference is between everyone and guest?
I thought they are same.
And, i still have one problem with my beans. See my next post.
Thanks.
minjiang
minjiang wrote:
Hi:
My applcation runs correctly on sp8.
Now even some of my jsp cannot run correctly with sp9. It also
compliants security exception. But strangely the first time WLS compiles
the
jsp, it can run correctly, the data is shown in the browser. But once
the
jsp is compiled, all subsequent call of this jsp will resort to
assertion
error.
Funny, seems the reason is that WLS sp9 changes the steteful beans
security checking. Previously the checking seems to be when the home is
obtained, now the checking seems to be in the time only the method is
called.
I am uisng bean home cache. Is it the cause of this error? I can get
around this by giving the jndi to guest, but it is not what i want. I
still
want to protect my beans jndi.
I need the solution urgently. Otherwise i have to roll back to sp8.
Thanks.
minjiang
See the stack trace below:
Mon Jul 02 16:36:58 SGT 2001:<I> <EJB JAR deployment
d:/weblogic/myserver/kbf_de
ploy/ordermgr.jar> Transaction: '994062053580_3435' rolled back due to
EJB
excep
tion:
javax.naming.NoPermissionException: User guest does not have lookup
permission
on kbf
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.NamingSecurityManagerImpl.checkPermission(Nami
ngSecurityManagerImpl.java:100)
at
weblogic.jndi.internal.NamingSecurityManagerImpl.checkLookup(NamingSe
curityManagerImpl.java:45)
at
weblogic.jndi.toolkit.BasicWLContext.resolveName(BasicWLContext.java:
737)
at
weblogic.jndi.toolkit.BasicWLContext.lookup(BasicWLContext.java:133)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:354)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.wrapEJBObject(StatefulEJBHome.j
ava:170)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.findOrCreateEJBObject(StatefulE
JBHome.java:275)
at
weblogic.ejb.internal.StatefulEJBHome.findOrCreateEJBObject(StatefulE
JBHome.java:258)
at
com.kbf.ejb.order.OrderBeanHomeImpl.findByPrimaryKey(OrderBeanHomeImp
l.java:98)
at
com.kbf.ejb.order.OrderBeanHomeImpl_ServiceStub.findByPrimaryKey(Orde
rBeanHomeImpl_ServiceStub.java:262)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBean.getOrders(OrderManagerBean.java
:695)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBeanEOImpl.getOrders(OrderManagerBea
nEOImpl.java:872)
at
com.kbf.ejb.ordermgr.OrderManagerBeanEOImpl_ServiceStub.getOrders(Ord
erManagerBeanEOImpl_ServiceStub.java:311)
at
com.kbf.webremotemgr.WebRemoteMgr.getOrders(WebRemoteMgr.java:1500)
at jsp_servlet._orderview._jspService(_orderview.java:349)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubIm
pl.java:120)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(ServletCon
textImpl.java:915)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(ServletCon
textImpl.java:879)
at
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextManager.invokeServlet(Servlet
ContextManager.java:269)
at
weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.invokeServlet(MuxableSocketHTTP.jav
a:365)
at
weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.execute(MuxableSocketHTTP.java:253)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:129)

Support for PostgreSQL as a source and/or target in DS XI3.2 SP2

Hi,
I've noticed that PostgreSQL is not mentionned in the supported database connectivity for Data Services XI 3.2 SP2 (Windows), but it is also stated that "3rd Party ODBC Level 2-compliant Drivers may potentially have issues as not all combinations have been tested yet, but are supported as a general rule."
Does it means that we could use PostgreSQL (v8.0 or v8.4) as a source and/or target with PostgreSQL ODBC connectors ?
Thanks,
Olivier

Hi Fabrice,
I may not have been clear enough, but when I said in my first post that "PostgreSQL is not mentionned in the supported database connectivity for Data Services XI 3.2 SP2 (Windows)", it meant that I've already read the PAR for Data Services XI 3.2 SP2.
I'm looking for precisions and advices about ODBC to generic data sources, where this document says that ODBC level 2-compliant drivers, although not fully tested, are supported as a general rule.
I wonder if it applies to PostgreSQL ODBC or Datadirect ODBC drivers for PostgreSQL.
Regards,
Olivier

TableView - support for datasource (on-demand loading and JDBC)

Hi,
I'm new to JavaFX and I was wondering if anybody knows any good practices for TableView with large datasets. Any API extension that supports datasources for on-demand loading and JDBC. Or any good tutorial, example or ideas. I was looking at DataFX but I don't see any datasource for JDBC in the javadocs even when it's mention their website.
Thanks in advance, any help or ideas are appreciated.

Hello,
here is some pseudocode for your requirement.
max pagesize is 100 per query request
i=0
While(!Lastpage)
request.startrownum=i;
response=LeadQuery(request);
Lastpage=response.lastpage;
i+=100
}

Platform Support for WLS 5.1 SP9 and / or WLS 6.x

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for