Playstation 4 Last of Us Bundle

Just a few days ago I found some news that all new Playstation 4's will come with The Last of Us. Is that the case with Best Buy as well? And out of curiosity, does that include bundling The Last of Us with the "4 Games 1 Pick" bundle?

Hello BruceW,
Thank you for posting on the forums! This is a separate bundle entirely with the The Last of Us Remastered game. Please continue to check here for updates on its availability.
Blake|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Similar Messages

Does the Ps4 last of us bundle apply for movers coupon???

Just purchased the ps4 last of us bundle and tried to use the movers coupon. I was promptly turned down by the manager at the Walker MI location. There is nothing that suggests the ps4 is excluded from this coupon when following the link on the back of the coupon. Called the 1-888... Number and they said the ps4 is not categorized under "Sony Blue Ray" which was the only category listed in the exclusions for the movers coupon that may hinder a ps4 or bundle from being discounted. Cust. Support contacted the store manager where I purchased the bundle and told me to bring my receipt and "try again?". After a few calls to stores and customer support, I am being told that nobody really knows.

Hello ecain711,
While there are a few different versions of our mover’s coupon and each comes with its own set of terms and conditions, 10% off a single item is a great deal! From my understanding, you should have been able to use the coupon towards your PS4 bundle purchase (unless purchased online), so I apologize for any inconvenience our denial may have caused.
Normally in this situation, I would contact our Walker location to ensure that we aren’t incorrectly denying the use of the coupon for anyone else and see what options we may have available to us to help you. While I will still speak with local management, I see that you’ve already made your PS4 purchase and as we cannot apply the coupon to an existing purchase, I’ve sent you a private message to discuss your case further. You may view it by logging into the forum and clicking on the envelope icon in the upper right-hand corner of the page.
Thank you for posting,
Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

PlayStation 3 (320GB) Uncharted 3 Bundle

I wanna order this product, but the specifications are quite vague.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sony+-+PlayStation+3+%28320GB%29+Uncharted+3+Bundle/3652529.p?id=1218424...
I would like to know about the bluray and dvd player, which region area they can read.
And if there's any extra accessory with the ps3, like a controller.

Hi hitomeh,
Welcome to the forum and thanks for your post about the PS3 Bundle! zztoluca pretty much hit it on the nose, but I thought I would chime in as well.
Your bundle should come with the needed accessories to get your console up and running, including a controller. zztoluca is also correct that normally PS3 games are not region specific, but your console will be a US console as it is manufactured here. If you are planning on taking it abroad, you might run into some compatibility issues.
As with movies and Blu Rays- those are region specific, so I would check out what the region is if you're looking to play any foreign movies.
if you have any mor questions, let us know!
Regards,
Mariel|Community Connector | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

ASR1002 MLP Bundle Problems

Hi fols,
We got ASR 1002 for use as LNS and move VPDN settings from 7204 to ASR1002... Looks like PPPoE interfaces (customers works pefect) but MLP Bundle cant establish :(
Cisco Console Log:
Feb 13 05:00:13 104.234.254.1 21010: Feb 13 10:00:12.732: %CPPOSLIB-3-ERROR_NOTIFY: SIP0: cpp_cp: cpp_cp encountered an error -Traceback= 1#adfdffd320bd4b50a075756a85bafaca   errmsg:7FB80973B000+121D cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D8D5 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D7D4 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+19A3E cpp_ifm:7FB81F747000+A158 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+C2F1 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+1CCA8 cpp_mlppp_svr_smc_lib:7FB815DF9000+2D28 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11E6E cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+118AA cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+116EB evlib:7FB80B72C0
Feb 13 05:00:13 104.234.254.1 21011: Feb 13 10:00:12.733: %FMFP-3-OBJ_DWNLD_TO_CPP_FAILED: SIP0: fman_fp_image: MLP bundle 174, link 170 download to CPP failed
Radius Log (look as well):
Fri Feb 13 04:59:41 2015 : Auth: Login OK: [[email protected]] (from client asr-lns1.xxxxx.com port 3445 cli BHVLPQ1004W lag-39:53)
Fri Feb 13 04:59:41 2015 : Info: Existing IP: x.x.x.x (did cli BHVLPQ1004W lag-39:53 port 3445 user [email protected])
Fri Feb 13 05:00:12 2015 : Auth: Login OK: [[email protected]] (from client asr-lns1.xxxxx.com port 3009 cli BHVLPQ1004W lag-39:53)
Fri Feb 13 05:00:12 2015 : Info: Existing IP: x.x.x.x (did cli BHVLPQ1004W lag-39:53 port 3009 user [email protected])
My Debug settings:
2# sh debug
PPPoE:
PPPoE protocol events debugging is on
PPPoE data packets debugging is on
PPPoE control packets debugging is on
PPPoE protocol errors debugging is on
MLP:
Multilink fragments debugging is on
Multilink events debugging is on
First bytes of multilink packet debugging is on
VTEMPLATE:
Virtual Template errors debugging is on
Virtual Template subinterface debugging is on
#sh log | in MLP
:01:13.742: Vi109 MLP: Dropped link Vi110 from bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:13.742: Vi109 MLP: Dropped last link, removing bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:13.742: Vi109 MLP: Removing bundle '[email protected]'
Feb 13 10:01:15.392: Vi111 MLP: Request add link to bundle
Feb 13 10:01:15.392: Vi111 MLP: Adding link to bundle
Feb 13 10:01:15.392: Vi111 MLP: Requested bundle vaccess creation
Feb 13 10:01:15.392: Vi111 MLP: Determine clone source for SSS
Feb 13 10:01:15.392: Vi111 MLP: Link is Virtual-Access, clone from Virtual-Template 1
Feb 13 10:01:15.395: Vi111 MLP: Determine clone source for SSS
Feb 13 10:01:15.395: Vi111 MLP: Link is Virtual-Access, clone from Virtual-Template 1
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi111 MLP: SSS connect, bundle interface Vi112
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi112 MLP: Changing bundle bandwidth from 100000 to 2000000
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi112 MLP: Interleaving disabled
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi112 MLP: Ready to finish adding link Vi111 to bundle
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi111 MLP: Computed frag size 7499992 exceeds MTU, changed to 1496
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi112 MLP: Update bundle bandwidth 2000000 set 2000000
Feb 13 10:01:15.396: Vi111 MLP: Change transmit status from Init to Enabled, transmit links 1
Feb 13 10:01:15.397: Vi112 MLP: Added first link Vi111 to bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:15.397: Vi111 MLP: Updating bundle's PPP handle[0xCE000105] in SSS context
Feb 13 10:01:15.398: Vi112 MLP: Received segment updated message for bundle
Feb 13 10:01:15.402: %FMFP-3-OBJ_DWNLD_TO_CPP_FAILED: SIP0: fman_fp_image: MLP bundle 179, link 178 download to CPP failed
Feb 13 10:01:17.694: Vi112: MLP: Bundle has 1/2 desired links, requesting another
Feb 13 10:01:43.097: Vi111 MLP: Change transmit status from Enabled to Idle, transmit links 0
Feb 13 10:01:43.097: Vi112 MLP: No previous member for idle link in '[email protected]'
Feb 13 10:01:43.097: Vi112 MLP: Update bundle bandwidth 2000000 set 2000000
Feb 13 10:01:45.102: Vi111 MLP: Request drop link from bundle Vi112
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi112 MLP: Removing link Vi111 from bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi111 MLP: Change transmit status from Idle to Init, transmit links 0
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi112 MLP: Bundle bandwidth 2000000 unchanged
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi112 MLP: Dropped link Vi111 from bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi112 MLP: Dropped last link, removing bundle [email protected]
Feb 13 10:01:45.103: Vi112 MLP: Removing bundle '[email protected]'
2# sh ppp multilink
Virtual-Access126
Bundle name: [email protected]
Remote Username: [email protected]
Remote Endpoint Discriminator: [3] 4c60.de51.dd67
Local Endpoint Discriminator: [1] asr1002
Bundle up for 00:00:25, total bandwidth 2000000, load 1/255
Receive buffer limit 12192 bytes, frag timeout 1000 ms
Bundle is Distributed
Using relaxed lost fragment detection algorithm.
    0/0 fragments/bytes in reassembly list
    0 lost fragments, 0 reordered
    0/0 discarded fragments/bytes, 0 lost received
    0x0 received sequence, 0x0 sent sequence
Platform Specific Multilink PPP info
    NOTE: internal keyword not applicable on this platform
    Interleaving: Enabled, Fragmentation: Enabled
Member links: 1 (max 16, min 2)
    BHVLPQ1004W:Vi125 (x.x.x.x), since 00:00:25, 7500000 weight, 1496 frag size, unsequenced
No inactive multilink interfaces
Border-ASR1002#sh users | in xxxxx
Vi129        [email protected] PPPoVPDN     never
Vi130        [email protected] MLP Bundle   00:00:06
NO IP ASSIGNED and this SESSIONs will be close in 30-50 sec. Then start again by circle.
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback100
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1460
ip tcp adjust-mss 1420
load-interval 60
no peer default ip address
keepalive 30
ppp mru match
ppp authentication pap chap xxx-netwrok.com
ppp authorization xxx-netwrok.com
ppp accounting xxx-netwrok.com
ppp ipcp dns 8.8.8.8
ppp multilink
ppp multilink links minimum 2
ppp multilink interleave
ppp multilink endpoint string asr1002
end
interface Loopback100
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255
end
#sh ppp statistics
Type PPP Statistic                              TOTAL      SINCE CLEARED
4    Transition Packet Drop                      2          2
5    Interrupt Transition Packet Drop            5          5
14   PPP Handles Allocated                       16620      16620
15   PPP Handles Freed                           13971      13971
16   LCP Renegotiations                          17         17
17   NCP Renegotiations                          3          3
18   NCP Negotiations Failed                     348        348
19   PPP Encapped Interfaces                     4583       4583
24   LCP Timeout+                                2892       2892
25   NCP Timeout+                                89257      89257
26   LCP Timeout-                                793        793
27   NCP Timeout-                                9542       9542
28   Authentication Timeout                      1984       1984
29   Configure-Ack Id mismatch                   9          9
30   Configure-Nak/Reject Id mismatch            21         21
Type PPP MIB Counters                           PEAK       CURRENT
1    Links at LCP Stage                          13         2
2    Links at Unauthenticated Name Stage         240        0
3    Links at Authenticated Name Stage           4          0
7    Links at Local Termination Stage            2650       2647
8    MLP Links at LCP Stage                      1          0
9    MLP Links at Unauthenticated Name Stage     1          0
10   MLP Links at Authenticated Name Stage       1          0
14   MLP Links at Local Termination Stage        3          0
20   Successful LCP neogtiations                 14497      14497
22   Entered Authentication Stage                14497      14497
28   IPCP UP Sessions                            2650       2647
48   CHAP authentication attempts                2          2
49   CHAP authentication successes               1          1
51   PAP authentication attempts                 14495      14495
52   PAP authentication successes                7397       7397
53   PAP authentication failures                 6141       6141
95   Total Sessions                              2651       2647
96   Non-MLP Sessions                            2650       2647
97   MLP Sessions                                1          0
98   Total Links                                 2654       2649
99   Non-MLP Links                               2653       2649
100 MLP Links                                   2          0
Type PPP Disconnect Reason                      TOTAL      SINCE CLEARED
11   Missed too many keepalives                  177        177
12   PPP Renegotiating                           18         18
15   LCP failed to negotiate                     1694       1694
17   Received LCP TERMREQ from peer              1465       1465
18   Received LCP TERMACK from peer while OPEN   2          2
24   Removing MLP Bundle                         412        412
27   MLP Kill Link                               4          4
29   Lower Layer disconnected                    3187       3187
37   Received disconnect from Session Manager    174        174
54   User failed PAP authentication              6141       6141
55   AAA Server did not respond                  695        695
57   Authentication timeouts exceeded            2          2
If i try look show interface for two interface in bundle i see like this:
Border-ASR1002#sh int Vi24
Virtual-Access24 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Virtual Access interface
Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback100 (x.x.x.x)
MTU 1442 bytes, BW 2000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open, multilink Open
REQsent: IPCP
MLP Bundle vaccess, cloned from Virtual-Template1
Vaccess status 0x44, loopback not set
Keepalive set (30 sec)
DTR is pulsed for 5 seconds on reset
Border-ASR1002#sh int Vi28
Virtual-Access28 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Virtual Access interface
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open, multilink Open
Link is a member of Multilink bundle Virtual-Access24
PPPoVPDN vaccess, cloned from Virtual-Template1
Vaccess status 0x44
Protocol l2tp, tunnel id 64648, session id 34181, loopback not set
Keepalive set (30 sec)
DTR is pulsed for 5 seconds on reset
Looks like normal. but in 30-60 sec this crashed... and sure we have not one customers with MLP... i hope we have around 20-30... so should be tonns MLP :)
Sure i lose few hours for find solutions but without luck. Nobody have exacly answer to this question.
I got abolutely working configuration from working NAS (7201 and 7204) and move it to ASR... thats what i have with MLP :((((
Can someone try help me investigate in figure our this....
I found same thread on ciscoforums where guys tell "need update ios" but someone update it and have same issue, so i hope issue not in IOS version.
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSAL-M), Version 15.3(2)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
IOS XE Version: 03.09.01.S
System image file is "bootflash:/asr1002x-universal.03.09.01.S.153-2.S1.SPA.bin"
If you need anything else, like more debug or more info ... just ask me... i will wait there for your questions.
Thanks a lot.!
/// Update
Little bit more debug from bootflash:/tracelogs/cpp_cp_F0-0.log.7749.20150213111013
02/13 11:09:07.734 [errmsg]: (ERR): %CPPOSLIB-3-ERROR_NOTIFY: cpp_cp encountered an error -Traceback= 1#adfdffd320bd4b50a075756a85bafaca   errmsg:7FB80973B000+121D cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D8D5 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D7D4 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+19A3E cpp_ifm:7FB81F747000+A158 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+C2F1 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+1CCA8 cpp_mlppp_svr_smc_lib:7FB815DF9000+2D28 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11E6E cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+118AA cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+116EB evlib:7FB80B72C000+B8E7 evlib:7FB80B72C000+E1B0
02/13 11:09:07.735 [buginf]: (debug):
-Traceback=1#adfdffd320bd4b50a075756a85bafaca   cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11445 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D7D9 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+19A3E cpp_ifm:7FB81F747000+A158 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+C2F1 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+1CCA8 cpp_mlppp_svr_smc_lib:7FB815DF9000+2D28 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11E6E cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+118AA cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+116EB evlib:7FB80B72C000+B8E7 evlib:7FB80B72C000+E1B0 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+13B43 :400000+6061 c:7FB7FC394000+1E514 :400000+5CC9
02/13 11:09:07.735 [cpp-mlppp]: (warn): [cpp_mlp_tx_link_create:3260] cpp_ifm_tx_chan_create_on_if failed link=1563 (retval='CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory)
02/13 11:09:07.735 [cpp-mlppp]: (warn): [cpp_mlp_svr_bundle_add_link_cmn:5035] cpp_mlp_tx_link_create failed link=1563 (retval='CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory)
02/13 11:09:41.978 [cpp-ifm]: (ERR): cpp_ifm_tx_chan_create_on_if.806: failed to find channel for parent if_h 100-'CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory
02/13 11:09:41.980 [errmsg]: (ERR): %CPPOSLIB-3-ERROR_NOTIFY: cpp_cp encountered an error -Traceback= 1#adfdffd320bd4b50a075756a85bafaca   errmsg:7FB80973B000+121D cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D8D5 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D7D4 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+19A3E cpp_ifm:7FB81F747000+A158 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+C2F1 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+1CCA8 cpp_mlppp_svr_smc_lib:7FB815DF9000+2D28 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11E6E cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+118AA cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+116EB evlib:7FB80B72C000+B8E7 evlib:7FB80B72C000+E1B0
02/13 11:09:41.981 [buginf]: (debug):
-Traceback=1#adfdffd320bd4b50a075756a85bafaca   cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11445 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+D7D9 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+19A3E cpp_ifm:7FB81F747000+A158 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+C2F1 cpp_mlppp_svr_lib:7FB815BBB000+1CCA8 cpp_mlppp_svr_smc_lib:7FB815DF9000+2D28 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+11E6E cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+118AA cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+116EB evlib:7FB80B72C000+B8E7 evlib:7FB80B72C000+E1B0 cpp_common_os:7FB80C74C000+13B43 :400000+6061 c:7FB7FC394000+1E514 :400000+5CC9
02/13 11:09:41.981 [cpp-mlppp]: (warn): [cpp_mlp_tx_link_create:3260] cpp_ifm_tx_chan_create_on_if failed link=1563 (retval='CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory)
02/13 11:09:41.981 [cpp-mlppp]: (warn): [cpp_mlp_svr_bundle_add_link_cmn:5035] cpp_mlp_tx_link_create failed link=1563 (retval='CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory)
02/13 11:10:13.049 [cpp-ifm]: (ERR): cpp_ifm_tx_chan_create_on_if.806: failed to find channel for parent if_h 100-'CPP Interface Database' detected the 'warning' condition 'IFDB detected error in API': No such file or directory

Originally Posted by CRAIGDWILSON
Look in your logs for any issues zmd-messages.log regarding accessing
"AppData". If so, that could be a known issue they are looking at,
though it is not really new but there are reports back to even 11.2.x
The reports are more of a timing issue on boot, but perhaps it could
relate to logon if that happened soon enough, though non of the reports
are for logon events.
On 6/25/2014 2:26 AM, thsundel wrote:
>
> Hi!
> Anyone else have problems with bundles not installing/launching on
> schedule with 11.3FRU1 agent? Also bundles set to launch at user login
> doesn't work first time the user logs in after workstation is booted, if
> they logout and in again then it will work?
>
> Thomas
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Technical Support Engineer
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
Nope, nothing refering to appdata (only thing it finds is appdatalrucache but that is probably not what you are asking for)...
I've now tried assiging the bundle both to device and to user but still nothing happes, works fine on our 11.2.x agent workstations.
Thomas

6.0 bundle 3049 bug Lost PIN option on compose menu

I just wanted to report a bug that I have experienced with the latest release of 6.0 software bundle 3049 V 6.0.0.706, platform 4.4.0.560. I am operating the Blackberry Style from Sprint. My issue is that the option to Compose a PIN message has disappeared from the Compose menu and from the Contact menu. I can still view and reply to PIN messages but I have no way to initiate one. I have downgraded to bundle 2426 to recover the PIN option But I feel that the battery lasts longer on bundle 3049 so I will suffer with the minor inconvenience of not being able to initiate a pin. Please pass on to the development team for review Thank you, M

Same here, except I'm on a 9330 curve with the same OS
Please click the Thumbs Up icon if this comment has helped you!
If your issue is resolved, please click the solution button on the resolution!
Every BlackBerry should have BlackBerry Protect, get it now! | Follow me on Twitter | Bring Back BBM Music!

Re: code for last of us not on receipt

hello. i purchesed the gta5 and last of us bundle on thursdays door busters but when i got the box opened i didnt see the voucher for the game download. i searched everywhere and i checked the trash to see if i may have throw it away with other stuff accidentally but i found nothing. what can i do?? please help. i was looking forward to playing this game really badly.
thanks much!

Hello brandonmp1,
Thanks for writing in, and thank you for visiting Best Buy on Black Friday weekend! I hope it was a fun experience.
In researching your purchase, it appears you were able to come to a resolution through the store. I am glad to see they were able to assist. Please let us know if you have any additional questions at this time.
Best regards,
Mike|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Port-channel bundled/unbundled

Is this bundled or not bundled, is what I'm trying to confirm.
I get two conflicting messages about, if the port-channel bundle is working or not working. (There is traffic on two channels intended to bundled)
Version 12.2
Switch1
Config on port 1/1 is encap 820.1q, node (defaul?)
Config on port 9/1 is encap (default?) ,and mode trunk
Switch1 and Switch2 configs are similar
Switch1 extracts
Switch1>sh int po 1 eth
Age of the Port-channel = 01d:04h:02m:05s
Logical slot/port = 14/1 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00010001 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = PAgP
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 55 Gi1/1 Desirable-Sl 4
1 AA Gi9/1 Desirable-Sl 4
Time since last port bundled: 01d:03h:45m:47s Gi9/1
Time since last port Un-bundled: 01d:03h:57m:35s Gi9/1
=======================================
Switch1>sh int g9/1 trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Gi9/1 on 802.1q trunk-inbndl 1
(Po1)
=========================================
Switch1#sh runn int port-channel 1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 160 bytes
interface Port-channel1
description EC TO ESW002 G1/1,G9/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 200-202,301
end
Switch1#sh run int g1/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 189 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
description To ESW002 G1/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 200-202,301
channel-group 1 mode desirable
end
Switch1#sh run int g9/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 173 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet9/1
description to ESW002 9/1
switchport
switchport trunk allowed vlan 200-202,301
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode desirable
end

You have setup a trunked etherchannel and it appears to be working correctly. this info tells you that the channel is working correctly, to check the trunk do a "show int trunk" also.
Switch1 extracts
Switch1>sh int po 1 eth
Age of the Port-channel = 01d:04h:02m:05s
Logical slot/port = 14/1 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00010001 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = PAgP
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 55 Gi1/1 Desirable-Sl 4
1 AA Gi9/1 Desirable-Sl 4

Fundamental question on etherchannel hashing.

Folks,
I had some very basic questions on the way hashing takes place on Cisco switches connected to each other over a port channel.
Considering that 2 links are used between the switch, namely port Gi 0/1 and Gi 0/2.
1) By default I understand that this could be a L2 etherchannel or L3 etherchannel, the default mode of hashing is still the Source and destination MAC id, am I correct?
2) So now if the source IP of 1.1.1.1 needs to reach to 1.1.1.2 how would the hashing calculation take place? Again I understand that this is on the basis of the last 3 bits from the IP address field. 001 and 010 come to 011 which is 3. So based on the number of ports it will select which interface to assign.
I still do not understand what has the below output got to do with the selection:
Core-01#sh interfaces port-channel 40 etherchannel
Age of the Port-channel   = 204d:07h:40m:10s
Logical slot/port   = 14/3          Number of ports = 2
GC                  = 0x00000000      HotStandBy port = null
Passive port list   = Te1/4 Te2/4
Port state          = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =    -
Port security       = Disabled
Fast-switchover     = disabled
Fast-switchover Dampening = disabled
Load share deferral = disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load      Port          EC state       No of bits
------+------+------------+------------------+-----------
0      E4            Te1/4                 On   4
1      1B            Te2/4                 On   4
Time since last port bundled:    204d:07h:19m:44s    Te2/4
Time since last port Un-bundled: 204d:07h:19m:54s    Te1/4
Core-01#
What does that load-value mean? and how is that calculated? and does that have a role to play in the selection of the port?
Thanks,
Nik

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
So it looks like how to divide the bits is decided by the switch.
Ah, yea, reread my original post for answer to your second question. ;)
An actual hashing algorithm can be rather complicated. What they try to do is to "fairly" divide the input value across the number of hash buckets. For example, if you have two Etherchannel links, they will try to hash the hash attribute such that 50% goes to one link and 50% to the other link.
For example, assuming you hash on source IP, how do you hash 192.168.1.1, .2, .3 and .4? A very simple hash algorithm could just go "odd"/"even", but what if your IPs were .2, .4, .6 and .8? A more complex algorithm would try to still hash these IPs equally across your two links.
Again, hashing algorithms can get complex, search the Internet on the subject, and you may better appreciate this.
Because of the possibility of such complexity, one vendor's hashing might be better than another vendor's, so they often will keep their actual algorithm secret.
No matter, though, how good a hashing algorithm might be, they all will hash the same attribute to the same bucket. For example, if you're still using source IP, and only source IP, as your hash attribute, all traffic from the same host is going to use the same link. This is why what attributes are used are important. Choices vary per Cisco platform. Normally, you want the hash attributes to differ between every different traffic flow.
Etherchannel does not analyze actual link loading. If there are only two active flows, and both hash to the same link, that link might become saturated, while another link is completely idle.
Short term Etherchannel usage, unless you're dealing with lots of flows, is often not very balanced. Longer term Etherchannel usage, should be almost balanced. If not, most likely you're not using the optimal hash attributes for your traffic.

Downloaded Faithlife Study Bible and it won't open.

I see it in iTunes under Apps. Double click or right click just don't work. Nothing seems to open the app.

This will only work if your computer (or another computer) can see the iPod outside of iTunes as a disk drive. I've had problems like the ones listed here before, and one thing that has helped the four or five times that it's occurred in my iPod-laden family is to reformat the device.
Plug it into a computer that can see the iPod as a disk drive (and set the iPod to appear as a disk drive if you haven't done so), and reformat the disk in it. In each case, the computer that couldn't see the device now recognizes it, iTunes then recognizes it, and asks if it can restore the settings.
I noticed that some of you experienced the issue after a system crash or lockup or hard reboot. If I understand this correctly, Windows saves the writes it needs to perform onto a disk into one bundle, and performs the writes altogether. If you cut that off by means of a crash or a hard reboot, or remove the device, before the last of these bundles have been performed, then you run the real risk of corrupting the disk (Macs aren't immune to this - I did that to my son's iPod by yanking it without ejecting it and had to reformat it).
Yes, reformatting the iPod will cause you to lose the data on the device, but I assume that you have the data on one or more of your computers. Obviously, YMMV, but it's worked several times in this house.
HTH
Keith.

WLC 4402 LAG connection to 2 different chassis of 6509 VSS switch system

Hi,
I have inherited a 6509 VSS switch system as the network core and have the task of ensuring proper redundancy and redesign of the directly connected data center devices. One of the connected devices (WLC 4402) physically appears to be connected to both switches - the WLC is in the same rack as VSS-Chassis1 so I can trace the fiber from WLC port 1 to gi1/1/22, the other fiber from the WLC port 2 goes into the floor and presumably over to VSS-Chassis2 gi2/1/22 (there is fiber connected there, I have link lights on both sides, and the port channel, Po200, on the VSS switch which is configured on gi1/1/22 is also configured on gi2/1/22). My question pertains to the CDP neighbor output I get on the VSS switch: (truncated to include just the WLC)
NCMECHQWiFi1     Gig 1/1/22        137               H    AIR-WLC44 Gig 0/0/2
NCMECHQWiFi1     Gig 1/1/22        137               H    AIR-WLC44 LAGInterface0/3/1
NCMECHQWiFi1     Gig 1/1/22        137               H    AIR-WLC44 Gig 0/0/1
It looks like both WLC ports are physically connected to Gi1/1/22, which they are quite obviously not.
This is confirmed on the WLC's sho cdp entry all output:
(Cisco Controller) >show cdp entry all
Device ID: ncmec-vsscoresw1.ncmec.org
Entry address(es): 100.1.0.254
Platform: cisco WS-C6509-E, Capabilities: Router Switch IGMP
Interface: LAGInterface0/3/1, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet1/1/22
Holdtime : 160 sec
I believe that the multi chassis etherchannel is set up correctly on the VSS:
vsscoresw1#sho run int gi1/1/22
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/22
description WLC-Management
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
channel-group 200 mode on
end
vsscoresw1#sho run int gi2/1/22
interface GigabitEthernet2/1/22
description WLC-Management
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
channel-group 200 mode on
end
vsscoresw1#sho run int po200
interface Port-channel200
description WLC-Management
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
end
And yet when I show the details of port channel 200, I expect to see "mode on" but get instead see LACP which is unsupported on the WLC:
vsscoresw1#sho etherchannel 200 detail
Group state = L2
Ports: 2   Maxports = 8
Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 1
Protocol:    -
Minimum Links: 0
                Ports in the group:
Port: Gi1/1/22
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 200         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel = Po200       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po200
Port index    = 0           Load = 0xFF        Protocol =    -
Mode = LACP
Age of the port in the current state: 180d:19h:47m:01s
Port: Gi2/1/22
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 200         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel = Po200       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po200
Port index    = 1           Load = 0xFF        Protocol =    -
Mode = LACP
Age of the port in the current state: 180d:19h:47m:02s
                Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po200
Age of the Port-channel   = 354d:12h:47m:27s
Logical slot/port   = 46/19          Number of ports = 2
GC                  = 0x00000000      HotStandBy port = null
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =    -
Fast-switchover     = disabled
Load share deferral = disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load      Port          EC state       No of bits
------+------+------------+------------------+-----------
0      FF       Gi1/1/22                 On   8
1      FF       Gi2/1/22                 On   8
Time since last port bundled:    173d:17h:06m:34s    Gi2/1/22
Time since last port Un-bundled: 173d:17h:06m:34s    Gi2/1/22
Last applied Hash Distribution Algorithm: Fixed
>>> So my question, arising at least partly from the apparently misleading CDP information, is this: How can I confirm that the WLC is correctly dual homed to both core switches? (short of tracing the cable) I ask because there are several other devices (not WLCs) that need to have the dual homed connections confirmed.
I tried a layer 2 trace route but for all macs associated with the WLC, the trace abborts with the error "Device has Multiple CDP neighbours on destination port."
Thanks in advance!
Sue

PS: It is critical that I confirm the redundancy, since as a part of the data center redesign we will be moving the second VSS chassis to the same rack with the first to simplify the dual connections. I need to verify all the redundant connections before I take it offline and move it. Thanks!

When does the online store restock?

currently looking to get a PS4 GTA V/Last of Us bundle and it's out of stock in the online store, when can I expect it to be restocked?

Didn't you already ask this question and get a response? This bundle hasn't been around for quite a while already, and you have been told that there is currently no information about it being made available again, which probably means it won't be after this long of not being stocked. There are newer games coming out that there will probably be bundles with instead.

Port channel Statistics

Hi ,
I have configured ether channel between two Cisco switches. When I look at the statistics on both switches port channel I am not very sure why they are different in terms of Load and No of bits. One end is showing for load 55 and AA, No of bit -4. Whereas the other end both are 0. Can someone please clarify this.
I tried to replicate the same in a Lab, but I see 0 on both ends.
Below is the details:
Switch 1
Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po1
Age of the Port-channel   = 588d:04h:38m:36s
Logical slot/port   = 10/1          Number of ports = 2
GC                  = 0x00010001      HotStandBy port = null
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =   PAgP
Port security       = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0     00     Gi1/1/1 Desirable-Sl       0
0     00     Gi1/1/2 Desirable-Sl       0
Switch 2
Port-channel: Po3
Age of the Port-channel   = 596d:05h:08m:01s
Logical slot/port   = 14/3          Number of ports = 2
GC                  = 0x00030001      HotStandBy port = null
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =   PAgP
Fast-switchover     = disabled
Load share deferral = disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load      Port          EC state       No of bits
------+------+------------+------------------+-----------
1      55          Gi7/5       Desirable-Sl   4
0      AA          Gi7/6       Desirable-Sl   4
Time since last port bundled:    0d:01h:59m:59s    Gi7/5
Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:02h:00m:02s    Gi9/10
Thanks

this works quite well as it turns out, I put the data on a Linux box and was able to add a date/time to each line, it then charts quite well in excel

Catalyst 3850 Cross-Stack EtherChannel

On 3850 configuration guide, I came across PAgP desirable mode is not supported in the switch stack (cross-stack EtherChannel).
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3se/layer2/configuration_guide/b_lay2_3se_3850_cg/b_lay2_3se_3850_cg_chapter_0101.html
But on Q&A document, it mentioned 3850 supports PAgP.
Q. What cross-stack EtherChannel link bundling protocols are supported?
A. The Cisco Catalyst 3850 supports Cisco Port Aggregation Protocol (PAgP) and industry-standard IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). Other 3750 Series Switches support only LACP for cross-stack EtherChannel.
Seems like both statements are contradicting.
Can someone shed some light on this?
Thank you.

Hi, adimakmur
Cisco Catalyst 3850 Cross-Stack EtherChannel can be PAgP+ and can be used for VSS dual active detection.
In last deployment of 3850 we use Cross-Stack EtherChannel and use it as trusted for VSS dual active detection.
c6500-V#sh switch virtual dual-active pagp
PAgP dual-active detection enabled: Yes
PAgP dual-active version: 1.1
----skiped----
Channel group 106 dual-active detect capability w/nbrs
Dual-Active trusted group: Yes
Dual-Active Partner Partner Partner
Port Detect Capable Name Port Version
Te1/7/7 Yes c3850-307 Te1/1/3 1.1
Te2/7/7 Yes c3850-307 Te2/1/3 1.1
---skiped----
c6500-V#sh etherchannel 106 protocol
Protocol: PAgP
c3850-307#sh etherchannel port-channel
Channel-group listing:
Group: 1
Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po1
Age of the Port-channel = 235d:20h:50m:10s
Logical slot/port = 12/1 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00010001 HotStandBy port = null
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = PAgP
Port security = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Te1/1/3 Desirable-Sl 0
0 00 Te2/1/3 Desirable-Sl 0
Time since last port bundled: 169d:04h:58m:49s Te1/1/3
Time since last port Un-bundled: 169d:05h:00m:47s Te1/1/3

LACP with a Cisco 2960G and an IBM I7 Server

I am attempting to get LACP working with a Cisco 2960 and an IBM I7 server.
The connection seems redundant. I can unplug GI0/8 and traffic still flows and clients are not disconnected from the IBM I7. I can do the same with GI0/9 once GI0/8 is plugged back in.
Two issues.
1. How can I change the LACP timer from slow to fast?
2. Why does my port Gi0/8 show as INDEP in the show lacp detail command?
Port: Gi0/8
Port state    = Up Sngl-port-Bndl Mstr Not-in-Bndl
Channel group = 3           Mode = Active          Gcchange = -
Port-channel = null        GC   =   -             Pseudo port-channel = Po3
Port index    = 0           Load = 0x00            Protocol =   LACP
Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs   F - Device is sending fast LACPDUs.
        A - Device is in active mode.        P - Device is in passive mode.
Local information:
                            LACP port     Admin     Oper    Port        Port
Port      Flags   State     Priority      Key       Key     Number      State
Gi0/8     SA      indep     32768         0x3       0x3     0x8         0x7D
Age of the port in the current state: 2d:17h:20m:08s
Port: Gi0/9
Port state    = Up Mstr Assoc In-Bndl
Channel group = 3           Mode = Active          Gcchange = -
Port-channel = Po3         GC   =   -             Pseudo port-channel = Po3
Port index    = 0           Load = 0x00            Protocol =   LACP
Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs   F - Device is sending fast LACPDUs.
        A - Device is in active mode.        P - Device is in passive mode.
Local information:
                            LACP port     Admin     Oper    Port        Port
Port      Flags   State     Priority      Key       Key     Number      State
Gi0/9     SA      bndl      32768         0x3       0x3     0x9         0x3D
Partner's information:
                  LACP port                        Admin Oper   Port    Port
Port      Flags   Priority Dev ID          Age    key    Key    Number State
Gi0/9     SA      0         40f2.e95c.f433 25s    0x0    0x8102 0x1     0x3D
Age of the port in the current state: 2d:17h:27m:44s
                Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po3    (Primary Aggregator)
Age of the Port-channel   = 365d:21h:06m:46s
Logical slot/port   = 2/3          Number of ports = 1
HotStandBy port = null
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =   LACP
Port security       = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0     00     Gi0/9    Active             0
Time since last port bundled:    2d:17h:26m:07s    Gi0/8
Time since last port Un-bundled: 2d:17h:25m:02s    Gi0/8

Hi,
With IBMi7 the support for LACP starts to my knowledge since i7.1 TR7. If that is your case will you please post the DSPLIND (with AGGRSCL option) command output.
As for the LACP fast timer setting while it can be configured on various Cisco boxes I am affraid it cannot be done with Cat2960.
Thanks & Regards,
Antonin

Best Buy You SUCK at customer service

I wanted to purchase a Sony PS4 Last of Us remastered bundle online and pick it up in a store, however, none were in stock locally. It showed that it was in stock online for shipping. I did not want to ship an item this expensive to my home and have it sitting outside on my porch all day, so I wanted to order it and ship it to my local store. There appeared to be no way to do that online, so I opened a chat session with Best Buy customer service. After explaining what I wanted to do to this person, they proceeded to ask for SKU numbers and zip codes and to just repeat back to me what I had already told them, that it was not in stock locally. I HAD already established that fact. I told her I wanted it shipped to the store and not to my home and she said you cannot do that. Later that evening, I decided to check the stores in a different city where I was going over the weekend to see if it was in stock and if so, I would be able pick it up then. I was glad to see that it showed the item as being in stock and I placed an order online and selected a store for pickup. I received an order confirmed email and soon after I received a YOUR ORDER IS READY FOR PICKUP email. I was very happy that things were working out so that I could get the Sony PS4 after all because it was a last minute surprise birthday gift for my child. However, things went horribly bad soon after I read the "your order is ready for pickup" email. I was not available to answer the phone and an employee from the store that I had selected for pickup left a message on our machine stating that the Sony PS4 Last of Us bundle that I had ordered was not available and did I want to get something else instead. My child was the one that played the message back and came running asking if I was buying a PS4. Needless to say, I am irate over all of this. I had received an ORDER IS READY FOR PICKUP email, so why did I get that If the order was NOT READY FOR PICKUP?!! Why is one of your store employees calling my house and saying it's not available after I was sent the order is ready for pickup email? I am so angry over that phone call because it ruined the birthday surprise that I had planned for my child. She has been wanting the PS4 since last year and I had purposely made her believe that I wasn't going to get her one. You should realize that people buy things as gifts throughout the year and you should not be calling and leaving messages stating what someone ordered where other family members can hear the message too. Regardless of that, I never should have been getting the phone call in the first place, since I had already received an ORDER IS READY FOR PICKUP email. {removed per forum guidelines} You are the most incompetent retail business that I have ever had the displeasure of dealing with. I have ordered from you in the past and the transactions were satisfactory then. The employees at my local store to your credit are knowledgable and friendly, but that is more to do with them, than it is to do with you as an employer. You do not know your own online retail business and you do not offer customers the more secure option of shipping something to their local store instead of to their home. You cannot keep track of the true status of your online transactions. You treat your online customers like they are idiots and do not know how to search for items to see if they are in stock within local stores. Overall, you SUCK at customer service. By the way, I'm canceling this order with you. After I got the phone call from your store employee telling me the PS4 was not available, I went online and ordered it from Walmart instead and I'm picking it up at a local store like I wanted. So that's an almost $500 sale that you lost due to your incompetence. Best Buy YOU are NOT the best buy and you should STOP using the name! Your name should be IDIOTS R US!

Hello msb1107 –
I would like to apologize for the poor experience you had with your order. It’s very regrettable that we caused your daughter’s birthday surprise to be ruined. I’m sure that was not the stores intention when calling to update you of the status of your order, and that they wanted to get a hold of you before coming into the store to find you couldn’t pick up your product.
I am going to reach out to the store on your behalf to find out what happened to cause this error, and to see what can be done to prevent it in the future, as well as any options we may have to help. Please allow me the weekend to get a response from the store, and when I have any new information I will notify via private message. To view your private messages, sign into the forums and click on the yellow envelope on the top right corner of the page.
Again I apologize for anger this has caused. Please reach out to me with any questions regarding this issue.
Sincerely,

Playstation 4 Last of Us Bundle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for