PLEASE HELP. shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use

Hi,
I am getting theses messages every 10 minutes and I don't know why.
Feb 17 03:17:21 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:17:21 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:27:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:27:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:37:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:37:23 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:47:24 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:47:24 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:57:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:57:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:07:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:07:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:17:27 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:17:27 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:27:29 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:27:29 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:37:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:37:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:47:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
The only strange thing that I see is that in /etc/inetd.conf
there are theses lines:
shell stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rshd in.rshd
shell stream tcp6 nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rshd in.rshd
exec stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rexecd in.rexecd
exec stream tcp6 nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rexecd in.rexecd
But I haven't enabled IPv6 on my system.
I also have this message at random time:
Feb 18 18:43:46 MONTSENY inetd[157]: [ID 268928 daemon.error] rusersd/rpc/datagram_v,circuit_v: could not get transport information
Feb 18 18:43:46 MONTSENY inetd[157]: [ID 307641 daemon.error] rusersd/rpc/datagram_v,circuit_v: tli_socket: No such file or director
There is only one instance of inetd running.
I haven't installed any additional services. At the beginning things went ok I think that the problem started when I added an IP address to the second eth interface.
The system is a Sun Netra T1.
The system version is: Solaris 8.
Please reply also to: [email protected]
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I am getting theses messages every 10 minutes and I don't know why.
Feb 17 03:17:21 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:17:21 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:27:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:27:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:37:22 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:37:23 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:47:24 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:47:24 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:57:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 03:57:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:07:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:07:26 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:17:27 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:17:27 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:27:29 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:27:29 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:37:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:37:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] shell/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Feb 17 04:47:30 MONTSENY inetd[29012]: [ID 161378 daemon.error] exec/tcp: bind: Address already in use
The only strange thing that I see is that in /etc/inetd.conf
there are theses lines:
shell stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rshd in.rshd
shell stream tcp6 nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rshd in.rshd
exec stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rexecd in.rexecd
exec stream tcp6 nowait root /usr/sbin/in.rexecd in.rexecd
But I haven't enabled IPv6 on my system.
I also have this message at random time:
Feb 18 18:43:46 MONTSENY inetd[157]: [ID 268928 daemon.error] rusersd/rpc/datagram_v,circuit_v: could not get transport information
Feb 18 18:43:46 MONTSENY inetd[157]: [ID 307641 daemon.error] rusersd/rpc/datagram_v,circuit_v: tli_socket: No such file or director
There is only one instance of inetd running.
I haven't installed any additional services. At the beginning things went ok I think that the problem started when I added an IP address to the second eth interface.
The system is a Sun Netra T1.
The system version is: Solaris 8.
Please reply also to: [email protected]
Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

  • Ftp (GNU inetutils) 1.6 error : [ftp: bind: Address already in use]

    hi,
    recently I discovered that I cant connect to many ftp servers using the common command line ftp client from a 64bit archlinux box.
    I tried connecting from other PCs at the same network (iMac) and it works without problems, the error is general, shows with every ftp server I tried,
    the client connects and then freezes or returns an error (depending on the ftp server)
    ftp: bind: Address already in use
    I got no firewall or iptables rules, I installed ncftp with pacman and it works, so I assume it's a ftp (GNU) client error,
    thanks
    GL

    Hi,
    see
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=136&thread=417946
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=136&thread=430814
    -- markus.

  • Bind address already in use

    Hello all,
    I have a strange problem with TCP sokets.
    on a SunOS5.9 Sparc machine i am running a server progam
    which has the sequence,
    socket()
    bind()
    listen()
    connect().....
    do lots of processing with the clients (around 28 clients)
    close()
    sleep(30)
    server restart the above sequence
    when restarting i get a bind error:
    Address already in Use.
    i have verifeid that the socket is close, return value of close is 0.
    Is it possible that socket resources are not released by kernel?
    Is tuning the value of tcp_time_wait_interval to a low value will help to get the code running.
    Or is there any other tunbale parameter to be tuned out.
    Please help me to resolve this.
    Thanks.

    Hello all,
    I have a strange problem with TCP sokets.
    on a SunOS5.9 Sparc machine i am running a server progam
    which has the sequence,
    socket()
    bind()
    listen()
    connect().....
    do lots of processing with the clients (around 28 clients)
    close()
    sleep(30)
    server restart the above sequence
    when restarting i get a bind error:
    Address already in Use.
    i have verifeid that the socket is close, return value of close is 0.
    Is it possible that socket resources are not released by kernel?
    Is tuning the value of tcp_time_wait_interval to a low value will help to get the code running.
    Or is there any other tunbale parameter to be tuned out.
    Please help me to resolve this.
    Thanks.

  • Address already in use,Please help me!

    I install solaris in vm6.
    At first ,it will run fine,but today when i restart it , I get these error
    inetd[337]:Failed to bind to the port of service instance svc:/network/swat/tcp:default,proto tcp:Address already in use.
    Too many bind failures for instance svc:/network/swat/tcp/:default, transitioning to maintenance
    in.ndpd[333] :solicit_event:giving up on pcn0
    syslogd:line 24:WARNING:loghost could not be solved.then i can login but when i connect it with ssh , I will be disconnected every 1-2 minutes,Please help me,
    Thanks very much

    Have you received any help on this issue..I'm seeing the same thing on one of my servers, alhoug I don't get disconnected...This error is spitting out to the console upon boot up..

  • When trying to verify the email address, I get the following message. Please help. This email address is already in use or you may already have an Apple ID associated with this email address. Please try again or sign in using your existing Apple ID.

    When trying to verify the email address, I get the following message. Please help. This email address is already in use or you may already have an Apple ID associated with this email address. Please try again or sign in using your existing Apple ID.

    Me too. I try to verify and i get the same message.
    I've created 3 alternate e-mail addresses and tried creating new accounts.
    Same Result!
    This is bullsh!t. How the **** can all 4 of my attempts result in the same freakin error???

  • Ipv4 mapped addresses bind problem: address already in use.

    Hello. It's me again with another, may be newbie, question.
    This time I observe different behavior binding different type of ip addresses on tcp sockets. For instance
    - when I bind ipv4 mapped addresses, if there is a remaining old socket in TIME_WAIT state from a previous run
    I get the error 'Address already in use', event with SO_REUSEADDR set.
    - when I bind another type of ipv6 or just ipv4 addresses. if there if a remaining old socket in TIME_WAIT state from
    a previous run, the bind is successful (SO_REUSEADDR is set).
    How can be explained this behavior?
    Thanks a lot.
    Details
    =======
    I made a small program to test this. This program:
    - dump the addresses to be used in bind() and connect()
    - creates a LISTEN SOCKET calling
    - socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
    - fcntl(F_SETFD, fcntl(F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC)
    - fcntl(F_SETFL, fcntl(F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK),
    - setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR),
    - setsockopt(SO_KEEPALIVE),
    - setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY),
    - bind()
    - listen()
    - creates a CONNECTING SOCKET calling
    - socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
    - fcntl(F_SETFD, fcntl(F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC)
    - fcntl(F_SETFL, fcntl(F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK),
    - setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR),
    - setsockopt(SO_KEEPALIVE),
    - setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY),
    - connect()
    - creates a ACCEPTED SOCKET calling
    - accept()
    - fcntl(F_SETFD, fcntl(F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC)
    - fcntl(F_SETFL, fcntl(F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK),
    - setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR),
    - setsockopt(SO_KEEPALIVE),
    - setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY),
    - issue a std::system( "netstat -an | grep 10329" )
    - wait with select() for a write event in the CONNECTING SOCKET
    - wait with select() for a write event in the ACCEPTED SOCKET
    - close the accepted socket
    - close the connecting socket
    - close the listen socket
    - issue another std::system( "netstat -an | grep 10329" )
    - exit(0)
    Note: please don't get confused with my notation of addresses, the last component, after the last colon, is the port.
    I run it with ipv4 mapped listen address, with this result:
    $ ./test_reuseaddr listen_address=0.0.0.0:10329 connect_address=127.0.0.1:10329
    Listener in *'::ffff:0.0.0.0:10329'*
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Connect to '::ffff:127.0.0.1:10329'
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Creating listen socket
    Creating connecting socket
    Creating accepted socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    *.10329 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    127.0.0.1.35114 127.0.0.1.10329 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35114 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    Closing connecting socket
    Closing accepted socket
    Closing listen socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    *127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35114 49152 0 49152 0 TIME_WAIT*
    Immediately run it again the same way, with this result (Address already in use):
    $ ./test_reuseaddr listen_address=0.0.0.0:10329 connect_address=127.0.0.1:10329
    Listener in *'::ffff:0.0.0.0:10329'*
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Connect to '::ffff:127.0.0.1:10329'
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Creating listen socket
    *### SYSCALL ERROR: bind(): 125, Address already in use*
    Wait and verify that the TIME_WAIT socket has disappeared
    $ sleep 120
    $ netstat -an | grep 10329
    Now run the same program with normal ipv6 listen addresses
    $ ./test_reuseaddr listen_address=*::0*:10329 connect_address=127.0.0.1:10329
    Listener in *':::10329'*
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Connect to '::ffff:127.0.0.1:10329'
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Creating listen socket
    Creating connecting socket
    Creating accepted socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    *.10329 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    127.0.0.1.35115 127.0.0.1.10329 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35115 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    *.10329 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    Closing connecting socket
    Closing accepted socket
    Closing listen socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    *127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35115 49152 0 49152 0 TIME_WAIT*
    Immediately run it again the same way (no error this time)
    $ ./test_reuseaddr listen_address=*::0*:10329 connect_address=127.0.0.1:10329
    Listener in *':::10329'*
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Connect to '::ffff:127.0.0.1:10329'
    1a 00 28 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..(Y............|
    00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
    Creating listen socket
    Creating connecting socket
    Creating accepted socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35115 49152 0 49152 0 TIME_WAIT
    *.10329 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    127.0.0.1.35116 127.0.0.1.10329 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35116 49152 0 49152 0 ESTABLISHED
    *.10329 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN
    Closing connecting socket
    Closing accepted socket
    Closing listen socket
    netstat -an | grep 10329
    *127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35115 49152 0 49152 0 TIME_WAIT*
    *127.0.0.1.10329 127.0.0.1.35116 49152 0 49152 0 TIME_WAIT*
    Run it againg many times with no error.

    sunlover1984 wrote:
    Sorry, to use such short forms in forums as i dont know much about this. i rarly use java forum. well, i removed the code that i gave u for server starting. but still it is giving me the same error. this time i put it in a java bean file.(Hint "u" is just another short form).
    Did you try the suggestion to put a log statement just before you start the server? Or put a breakpoint at that line and see how often it is reached.
    Because the only reason for this problem is that something is already listening at that port.
    And if there's really nothing listening before you start you application, then only your application itself can listen there already, so the logical conclusion for me would be that you're starting the Server twice.

  • Unable to bind socket: Address already in use

    Hi,
    I get the following error whenever I start my Application Server on Linux machine.
    If I deploy the EJB application onto a OC4J instance, the server is refusing the connection by throwing Connection Refused error.
    Any insight about this issue will be helpful.
    Thanks,
    Mohan
    04/07/08 17:14:42 Error starting ORMI-Server. Unable to bind socket: Address already in use
    04/07/08 17:14:44 Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0) initialized
    04/07/08 17:14:44 java.lang.NullPointerException
    04/07/08 17:14:44 at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIServer.run(RMIServer.java:470)
    04/07/08 17:14:44 at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(Releasabl
    eResourcePooledExecutor.java:186)
    04/07/08 17:14:44 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

    have you checked to see what is running before you start your oracle app server on your ports? you can use netstat for one

  • LOG Q0I= NiIBindSocket: bind (98: Address already in use) [nixxi.cpp 3740] [Thr 140207008876384] *** ERROR = NiIBindSocket: SiBind failed for hdl 17/sock 7

    Dear All ,
    I am installing SAP Netveiwer 7.2 with oracle 11 g database in suse linux 11  but i am getting one error in Start instance phase , my message server is not getting connected , when i am trying to start manually  then my instance is connected but in this phase sap check message server is up or not , here i am attaching log of message server where i am getting error  , if any buddy knw Plz help me ....
    log file -
    trc file: "dev_ms.new", trc level: 1, release: "720"
    [Thr 140207008876384] Tue Jun 10 01:34:56 2014
    [Thr 140207008876384] ms/http_max_clients = 500 -> 500
    [Thr 140207008876384] MsSSetTrcLog: trc logging active, max size = 52428800 bytes
    systemid   390 (AMD/Intel x86_64 with Linux)
    relno      7200
    patchlevel 0
    patchno    413
    intno      20020600
    make       multithreaded, Unicode, 64 bit, optimized
    pid        7294
    [Thr 140207008876384] ***LOG Q01=> MsSInit, MSStart (Msg Server 1 7294) [msxxserv_mt. 2280]
    [Thr 140207008876384] SigISetDefaultAction : default handling for signal SIGCHLD
    [Thr 140207008876384] ***LOG Q0I=> NiIBindSocket: bind (98: Address already in use) [nixxi.cpp 3740]
    [Thr 140207008876384] *** ERROR => NiIBindSocket: SiBind failed for hdl 17/sock 7
        (SI_EPORT_INUSE/98; I4; ST; 0.0.0.0:3601) [nixxi.cpp    3740]
    [Thr 140207008876384] *** ERROR => MsSCommInit: NiBufListen(sapmsINI) (rc=NIESERV_USED) [msxxserv_mt. 12225]
    [Thr 140207008876384] *** ERROR => MsSInit: MsSCommInit [msxxserv_mt. 2324]
    [Thr 140207008876384] *** ERROR => MsSInit failed, see dev_ms.new for details
    [msxxserv_mt. 7572]
    [Thr 140207008876384] ***LOG Q02=> MsSHalt, MSStop (Msg Server 7294) [msxxserv_mt. 7631]

    Hello Shyam,
    I don't see how updating the kernel would help in this case.
    If the port was already in use, any kernel version would give the same error.
    Hello Arpit,
    Since this is a Linux server, you can also run "lsof -nP|grep 3601" (may need to be logged on as "root"). This should give you more details than "netstat" (e.g., it will give you the PID of the process that's already using the port).
    The solution has already being pointed on this thread. You need to find out which process is using the port, and stop this other process.
    Cheers,
    Isaías

  • Closed TCP connection throws "Address already in use:connect"

    Hello,
    I am writing a deamon that has to connect to a server from a well-specified local port number.(very imp. constraint)
    Evry time I have to write something on server's output stream I do:
    public synchronized void sendMsg(byte[] msg) throws IOException {
         //#1
         clientSocket = new Socket();
         clientSocket.setReuseAddress(true); //so i can bind even when in TIME_WAIT
         clientSocket.setKeepAlive(false); //optional, but i guess no harm here
         clientSocket.bind(localSocketAddress); //local address is correct
         clientSocket.connect(hostSocketAddress); //.. and so is the host address
         //#2
         clientSocket.getOutputStream().write(msg);
         clientSocket.getOutputStream().flush();
         clientSocket.shutdownOutput();//optional..
         clientSocket.close();// so I DO close the socket
    After the 1st successfull attempt to write to the server,
    a call to sendMsg(..) is throwning a "Address already in use: connect" IOExc.
    The problem comes from clientSocket.connect() but that's odd since I closed the socket in earlier call..
    I think the physical connection is not closed, although the clientSocket.close() returned..
    So I put the code from //#1 to //#2 into a loop that catches the exception, attempts to close and sleeps
    for a while(1 sec).. but no use! it seems looping forever...
    Is there a way I can force the connection be closed so I can create a new one safely?
    [I can't reuse the same connection for multiple calls - it's ugly and the server may close it anyway..]
    Any hint, ideea?
    Thank you
    L

    1st becasue it's ugly to maintain a connection for
    daysYes. But it is also ugly to continuely close and open a socket.
    The solution is to add a timeout which closes the connection if it has not been used for a certain amount of time.
    2nd because the server may close it [and i can't stop
    him for doing that]
    So you add retry logic. But given that you are using TCP you must be guaranteeing delivery so you have to have retry logic if the server isn't up in the first place right? The same logic is used if the connection has failed.

  • ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use

    Hey guys,
    I created 2 WL 10.3 Domains. I can start the admin server in domain but when I start the second admin server i get the following error:
    starting weblogic with Java version:
    ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
    ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510)
    JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../.
    ./../src/share/back/debugInit.c:690]
    FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_E
    RROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197)
    Starting WLS with line:
    C:\bea\JDK160~1\bin\java -client -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket
    ,address=8453,server=y,suspend=n -Djava.compiler=NONE -Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:Com
    pileThreshold=8000 -XX:PermSize=48m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
    -Xverify:none -Xverify:none -da:org.apache.xmlbeans... -ea -da:com.bea... -da:
    javelin... -da:weblogic... -ea:com.bea.wli... -ea:com.bea.broker... -ea:com.bea.
    sbconsole... -Dplatform.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3 -Dwls.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\serv
    er -Dweblogic.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\server -Dweblogic.management.discover=tru
    e -Dwlw.iterativeDev=true -Dwlw.testConsole=true -Dwlw.logErrorsToConsole=true
    -Dweblogic.ext.dirs=C:\bea\patch_wlw1030\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classp
    ath;C:\bea\patch_wls1030\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classpath;C:\bea\patch
    cie670\profiles\default\sysextmanifest_classpath;C:\bea\patch_alsb1031\profile
    s\default\sysext_manifest_classpath -Dweblogic.Name=TestAdmin2 -Djava.security.p
    olicy=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\weblogic.policy weblogic.Server
    ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
    ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510)
    JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../.
    ./../src/share/back/debugInit.c:690]
    FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_E
    RROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197)
    Stopping PointBase server...
    I changed the port address of both admins but I dont' think that's the issue. Can someone tell me whats going on.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Iam getting the Same Error , Can you provide me some information on what changes did you made to the setDomainEnv.cmd file to make this work
    thanks in advance

  • Error starting ORMI-Server.  Unable to bind socket: Address already in use:

    hi,
    I run the folowing command "start_oc4j.bat" to start Oc4j.
    It starts successfully.
    Then I start "BPEL PM Server".
    I get the following error,
    "Error starting ORMI-Server. Unable to bind socket: Address already in use: JVM_Bind".
    I understand the above errror because both of them are trying to bind to the same port. And both of them are trying to start ORMI server. Can some one suggest how to get rid of this problem.
    I tried giving different port numbers for them, but that did not work. Let me know, how to over come this problem.
    with regards
    shaila

    You may have another OC4J running on your computer.
    You should change the port number in the file config/rmi.xml.

  • Address already in use: Cannot bind

    Hi all. I have a desktop app that sends commands and receives responses from a network appliance.
    All commands and responses work fine except one - trying to use RTPSocketPlayer on port 49154.
    The normal command and response UDP port is 49152. Streaming audio should come in on port 49154.
    I am closing and disconnecting the socket on 49152 after every command and response.
    But when I try to invoke the RTPSocketPlayer and bind port 49154 to my local IP, I get the
    Address already in use: Cannot bind error.
    Any suggestions? Thanks!
    waynew

    Ah OK, I get it. Change the InitSocket() method thus:
    sock = new DatagramSocket(null);
    sock.setReuseAddress(true);
    sock.bind(new InetSocketAddress(addr, sockPort));but also have a look at netstat -an to see who else is on that port and whether that's OK.

  • Transport error 202 bind failed address already in use

    how to rectify -- transport error 202 bind failed address already in use-- while running CA server
    i have created new production and pub server, first i runned production server after that while running CA server i got that error. if i run CA server independently its running

    It seems like a port conflict issue. You should check rmi and other ports in the configuration file for the component /atg/dynamo/Configuration in the localconfig of your production and publishing servers directories under <ATG>\home\servers. Also, your app server should be configured to run two separate instances for production and publishing server as per the http ports specified in /atg/dynamo/Configuration.

  • Need help on ORA-12542: TNS:address already in use

    Hi Toady morning , i faced this error. my database and listener is already up and running but application user posted this error to me. i do not see any error logs in oracle. could anybody pls help me as soon as possible. for workaround i have restarted the database. As it is in production needed urgent help. Below is the error;
    Thu Aug 30 08:37:47 2012 733000 [DM_SESSION_E_CANT_MAKE_TEMP_CONNECTION]error: "Could not establish an internal, temporary database connection (database_name = , docbase_owner = I102, connection_string = ECM53); database system error was: ORA-12542: TNS:address already in use
    Current Session ID: 0100213a8155ce3e
    Last SQL statement executed by DB was:
    No Session Record.TID(10176) failure during processing of request: NewSessionByAddr_string.
    Thanks in advance

    890482 wrote:
    Hi Toady morning , i faced this error. my database and listener is already up and running but application user posted this error to me. i do not see any error logs in oracle. could anybody pls help me as soon as possible. for workaround i have restarted the database. As it is in production needed urgent help. Below is the error;
    Thu Aug 30 08:37:47 2012 733000 [DM_SESSION_E_CANT_MAKE_TEMP_CONNECTION]error: "Could not establish an internal, temporary database connection (database_name = , docbase_owner = I102, connection_string = ECM53); database system error was: ORA-12542: TNS:address already in use
    Current Session ID: 0100213a8155ce3e
    Last SQL statement executed by DB was:
    No Session Record.TID(10176) failure during processing of request: NewSessionByAddr_string.
    Thanks in advancebcm@bcm-laptop:~$ oerr ora 12542
    12542, 00000, "TNS:address already in use"
    // *Cause: Specified listener address is already being used.
    // *Action: Start your listener with a unique address.
    How do I ask a question on the forums?
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

  • Web Service Client, BindException, Address already in use, saaj.SOAPExcepti

    Hello,
    Am caught up with an error and i can't get past it, need some help here.
    My application is a batch processing web service client, reads some input rows, sends web service requets, processes the responses and logs it.
    The application runs well in normal mode, but under load(more thread count), I get this wierd error and I can't make it go away.
    java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.SOAPExceptionImpl: Message send failed
    Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(Unknown Source)
    I have properly closed the connections after each web service calls, but it still says Address in use. Please refer below for the complete stack trace and a piece of the code. Am using SAAJ and JWSDP and am not using AXIS api. I have searched the web but couldn't find any solutions.
    This is not an error that server is not closing connections properly as I was able to test with SOAPUI and LoadRunner with even higher threads and it ran without problems. SOAPUI and LoadRunner scripts were executed from the same client machine as my application uses. Please help.
    For each inputrow
    SOAPConnection connection = null;
    try
    SOAPConnectionFactory soapConnFactory = SOAPConnectionFactory.newInstance();
    connection = soapConnFactory.createConnection();
    SOAPMessage request = getRequest(inputRow);
    SOAPMessage response = connection.call(request, "http://<<server>>:<<port no>>/Domain/Services/Mgmt");
    finally
    if (connection != null)
    connection.close();                         
    }catch(SOAPException se){
    System.out.println("Error while closing connection. " + se.getMessage());
    connection = null;
    } // End of for loop
    Stack Trace:
    java.security.PrivilegedActionException: com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.SOAPExceptio
    nImpl: Message send failed
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection.call(HttpSOA
    PConnection.java:121)
    at ClientImpl.getResponse(ClientImpl.java:440)
    at input.InputSampler$MyCallable.call(Sampler.java:63)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown Source)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    Caused by: com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.SOAPExceptionImpl: Message send failed
    at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection.post(HttpSOA
    PConnection.java:325)
    at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection$PriviledgedP
    ost.run(HttpSOAPConnection.java:150)
    ... 12 more
    Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(Unknown Source)
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(Unknown Source)
    at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(Unknown Source)
    at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source)
    at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(Unknown
    Source)
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(Unknown Sour
    ce)
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(Unknown Source)
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream(Unknown S
    ource)
    at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection.post(HttpSOA
    PConnection.java:282)
    Is there something like connection pooling for web services, is that the answer to this issue, if yes, please let me know where i should start.
    Thanks
    Dev

    Move server socket creation out of while loop. You don't need to create new server socket every time.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ipod Touch and Windows 7 64 Bit - Itunes not recognizing

    I have Windows 7 64 bit operating system. I have been struggling with getting my Itunes and Ipod touch to work together - somewhere an update or upgrade screwed things up. Right now, I have Itunes 10 64 bit installed on my computer. When I plug in th

  • Error when accessing online - lost subscription

    I was having a problem exporting a pdf into excel/word. I followed some suggestions from previous questions, signed out and signed back in again. However when I signed back in, adobe is coming up that I need to subscribe again to receive this functio

  • Corresponding Integ. Server Configuration ?

    Hi, As per SAP documentation Corresponding Integ. Server configuration should be either http://<host>:<port>/sap/xi/engine?type=entry or dest://<IntegrationServer-Destination> In my client PI server they are using  dest://INTEGRATION_DIRECTORY_HMI wh

  • Firefox weet niet hoe het dit adres moet openen, omdat het protocol (dpql) met geen enkel programma is verbonden.

    I am using an HP 8540w with fingerprint encryption. Till a few weeks ago I could use that system to quickly get my username and password on login screen. Now it does not work (It still works with IE) and gives the following diagnostic: Firefox weet n

  • How to pay for photobook on iphoto

    On  iphoto app on my ipad I have created a book and want to buy it I get to entering shipping address and after entering it I press done and it disappears and I get no further with purchasing my book! Soo annoying .