Plor not generated for components during Heuristic planning run

Hi experts,
i had run planning run PP_02 run in PPDS and i am able to see dependent requirment for componenets but my question is its not generating planned order for my components. Please let me know if i had missed any config.
Second point is i am planning to run 1. Infinit planning runa nd then finit planning run ( PP-02 and MRP_02).please suggest.
Third is when i run planning run (Product heuristic its giving me an error saying it space constrains.Please suugest me.
Thanks
Raj

Hi,
With the heuristics SAP_MRP_002: Product planning (plan comp. immediately) , components that are defined as being planned automatically and immediately are planned using a simple lot-sizing heuristic.
SAP_PP_001 is for Changing orders manually. Better choice may be to use SAP_PP_002: Planning standard lots. We use this heuristic to create new receipt elements in order to cover product requirements
regards
Datta

Similar Messages

Purchase requisition not generate for dependent requirement after MRP run

Hello PP expert,
In our MTO scenario after MRP run planned order generate for header material but no PR generate for BOM components, (BOM not explode) when we run MRP component level in MD02 PR generate, system showing message "40- No coverage not provided by master plan" in MD04 order tree. this problem coming after when we DIMP applied. I checked some OSS note also.
Can any one provide right solution.
thanks in advance.....its urgent as client requirement.
regards,
Amit Awasthi.

Hi Amit
You must select the green star for the correct answer, in order to close the thread.
You may also select the yellow start for the helpful answers, in order to award points for those who helped you. See the blog below for more details:
How to close a discussion and why
I can see that most of your old threads are still open, therefore, I'd like to ask you to review and close them, by selecting the correct answer.
BR
Caetano

Pur req not generated for MRP element Planned order in stock reqmnts list

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a problem where in MD04, pur req is not generated for the MRP element Planned order for a future date (about two months from now). Is there a specific reason? why is it not being generated? The MRP type is PD. The procurement type is F - external procurement. Can anybody please help me on this?
Thanks
Anusha

Anusha,
?? Not sure I understand the question. Are you saying MRP is creating planned orders instead of purchase reqs? Or, are you saying that no proposals at all are being created outside of two months? Or, are you saying that the system is creating purchase reqs inside of two months, and planned orders outside of two months?
Regardless, these problems are probably related to your MRP settings. Try the following settings:
NEUPL   Regenerative planning
1       Purchase requisitions
3       Schedule lines
1       MRP list
3       Delete and recreate planning data
2       Lead time scheduling and capacity planning
on your MDBT screen.
Regards,
DB49

TimeStream Error (not generated for year 1970)

Dear Experts ,
I am facing a problem with Time Stream .... When i try to open a Planning Book i am receiving the following message:
Timestream (TS ZBRSNP_ZF ) not generated for year 1970
Message no. T9507
Diagnosis
The date is outside the periods maintained in the factory or planning calendar (timestreams).
System Response
The error causes a system crash.
Procedure
a) Regenerate the timestream as far in the future (or possibly the past) as possible
or
b) Use the report ZZTSTRDELE to delete the runtime objects of the timestreams, if changes have been made to Customizing settings. For more information, see SAP Note 169885.
It starts happen after i included Initial Column at Planning Book .... The Factory Calendar that i am using starts on 2006 and ends on 2020 .... The timestream i am using is looking for 2 years in the past and 9 years in the future.
*The message above says that it is necessary to execute report ZZTSTRDELE but i am having some problems while donwloading SAP note. It is possible do delete it manually? exist another way to fix this issue?
Please i hope someone can help me as soon as possible ....
My Best Regards
Mauricio Filho

Hi Sunitha,
We have same type of problem now, could you plz adivise me how to fix this error and where we need to configure to overcome this error.
Thanks in advance
Sreeenivasu

Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays

Hi
creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
the plant calander is also correct
with regards
partha

Hi
I would really double check the factory calendar ans the of the plant and sales organisation
regards,
Sidi

Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?

The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help
regards
Subrat

IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if the following is maintained or not
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAED PLA AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLABED PLA BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLACESS PLA cess account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAECS PLA ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLASED PLA SED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AED RG 23 AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23BED RG 23 BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23SED RG 23 SED account
DLFC       DR Debit       MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client)

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help

Dear G. Lakshmipathi,
As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
so please help me in this regards.
Thanks with Regards
Subrat

J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011

Hi,
J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011, we have executed Qefile from 01/01/2011 to 31/03/2011 then file is generating but March 2011 data is not available.
Problem is challans were updated in the month of April 2011 for March 2011 documents, When we executed J1INMIS report with Bank Challan status, documents are coming in the report.
As per our understanding Challan numbers and Bank Challan update should be done in the month of March 2011 but challans and Bank challans were updated in the April 2011.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Ratnam

Hi Vara,
Please check following thing in the system.
1) When the Challan is created ( March month or April 2011)
2) When the Bank challn updated for the challans
3) If the Challan created in the April and generating returns for the month of March 2011.
4) Check in J1INMIS report for the month posting date 01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011, if the external Challan number is appearing or not for the documents.
5) If the Challan created in the April ask user to revere through J1INREV, and make Challan in the month of march 2011.
Problem will solve.
Thanks,
Ratnam.

Connection has no password, -jdbc.xml file not generated for connection

Hi,
I'm migrating a jdev 10g web application (with EJB) to 11g, i did the automatic migration tool offred by 11g, i'm using the integrated weblogic server but it seems there is a *-jdbc.xml file missed, and it must be generated, this is the log file of the start of server :
IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
[Running application SAB_ADMIN on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
[09:14:15 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[09:14:15 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[09:14:18 AM] Retrieving existing application information
[09:14:19 AM] Running dependency analysis...
[09:14:19 AM] Deploying 4 profiles...
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ViewControllerWebApp.war
[09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war
[09:14:25 AM] Wrote EJB Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelEJB.jar
[09:14:25 AM] WARNING: Connection DBConnectionSAB has no password. DBConnectionSAB-jdbc.xml file not generated for connection DBConnectionSAB.
[09:14:26 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN
[09:14:26 AM] Deploying Application...
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.065--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101371> <There was a failure when processing annotations for application C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war. Please make sure that the annotations are valid. The error is oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet>
<14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID '1287044066833' for task '0'. Error is: 'weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root''
weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root'
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppModule.prepare(WebAppModule.java:404)
 at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ScopedModuleDriver.prepare(ScopedModuleDriver.java:180)
 at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.prepare(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:199)
 at weblogic.application.internal.flow.DeploymentCallbackFlow$1.next(DeploymentCallbackFlow.java:508)
 at weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:41)
 Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
Caused By: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet
 at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:280)
 at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:253)
 at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:56)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:303)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
 Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace

This is the content of my web.xml file where i found the markup <servlet> and i tried to run without the first one but the error still like it was :
<servlet>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<description>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</description>
<display-name>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</display-name>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ConnexionBaseDeDonnees</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>oracle.controll.ResultatRequete</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/ResultatRequetePort</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Thanks...

Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt

Hi,
i created RMA receipt but for this credit memo not generated in AR, Manually i have run the Workflow Background Process & Receiving transaction processor concurrent also. even though CM not generated(In AR Interface lines table also data is not available)..or else is there any possibility for cancel or return the RMA Receipt quantity?
regards
Balaji
Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:22 PM
Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:51 PM

Dear Balaji,
Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt,Can u put manual credit in AR
Regards,
Shineee..

Error occurred during CTM planning run

Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Khadar

Hi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Planning File Entry not generated for items releveant to PM

MRP procedure used for material is reorder based planning , in April -09 the stock for this material is consumed and becomes
zero (reorder point is 8 ,Maximum Stock Level is 8 ) and after that in MRP run the requirement is not generated .
But as per the setting of reorder point PR should be initiated.
When checked the MD21 , material is not flagged ,
I want to know the specific reason why only this material is not flagged for MRP run.
What all settings i can check ?
MATERIAL TYPE : YMRO OP Maint/ Repair/OperSup
Lot size : Repl. to max. stock level after cov. req
Procurement type : F

Hi,
Run the reports MDRE & MDAB to ensure the planning file entries are correct.
About your query what might have caused a entry not to be in planning file, well it could be many. So run the above reports & then run MRP & check the results.
Regards,
Vivek

Rule based ATP is not working for Components

Hi All,
Our requirement is to do availability check through APO for Sales order created in ECC,so we are using gATP.
Requirement: We are creating salesorder for BOM header (Sales BOM) and avaialbility check should happen for components i.e. Product avalaibility & Rule based substitution.
Issue: Product availiabilty is working for components but rules based substituion is working, mean Rules are not getting determind for components.
Settings:
- Header doesnot exist in APO and compnents do exist in APO
- Availability check is not enabled for header item category and enabled for Item category for components
- Rules have been created for Components in APO
- Rule base ATP is activated in Check instructions
We have also tried MATP for this i.e. PPM created in APO but still didn't get the desired result.
If we create salesorder for the component material directly then Rule based ATP is happening, so for components Rule based ATP is not working.
How do we enable enable Rulesbased ATP for components, i mean is there any different way to do the same.
Thanks for help.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Hi Jagdeesh,
If you are creating BOM in ECC and CIFing PPM of FG/Header material to APO, I think you need to CIF Header material, too, with material integration model.
Please include header material in you integration models for material, SO and ATP check as well.
For component availability check, you can use MATP; but for MATP, FG should be in APO. You need not to CIF any receipts of FG (stock, planned orders, POs etc), so that MATP will be triggered directly. Then maintaining Rules for RMs will enable to select available RMs according to the rule created.
Regards,
Bipin

I do not qualify for the Verizon edge plan, even though I have been customer ever since they bought Alltel. Has anyone else had this problem.

Today I went to the Verizon store to upgrade my girlfriends phone which is on my account b/c I wanted to use the edge plan to buy the iPhone 5c. I had read in several different places that I could upgrade using edge and not loose my unlimited data, turns out I was misinformed, which the guy at the store told me after he had my information pulled up using my cell number. I told the guy I was not willing to give up my unlimited plan AND pay full price for the phone, I thanked him for his time and we left. When we left the store I called the Verizon number that is given on the website and told them I was interested in the edge plan for the 5c and asked for more information, ( I thought the guy at the store was wrong and I was checking). The woman I talked.......long story short, I talked to 8 people including 2 managers and none of them could tell me why I did not qualify for the edge financing (even if switching the plan), SO I was hoping someone on here might could help. I have been a customer since Verizon bought out Alltel, I have automatic payments set up with no late payments for as long as I can remember, and was eligible for an upgrade on 01/03/2013. Any experience or advice in this area would be appreciated.
Thank You!

rjg030585 wrote:
I told the guy I was not willing to give up my unlimited plan AND pay full price for the phone, I thanked him for his time and we left.
Here is my advice, at least. Not sure if anyone will agree, but it is my take on the problem.
With the Edge program, there is a "possibility" that someone will pay full price for a phone. This is not always the case, though. IF you do not complete ALL of the 24 months of payments, then you WILL NOT have paid full price for the phone, but simply a portion of the full price. THAT is why it does not make the plan "eligible" to keep your unlimited data. With the Edge plan, technically you only have to pay 50% of the full price before you can trade it in for another phone on the Edge plan. The way the plan is designed, the majority of people WILL NOT ever pay full price for the phone, but only a portion of the full price before they exchange their phone for a new device. That is what Verizon is hoping for, at least.
As Ann154 has pointed out, you can use the Device Payment Plan and keep your unlimited data. At no time during your contract can you trade THAT phone in to get another phone. You would have to continue making the payments on THAT phone along with any other phone you upgraded to. THAT is the difference between the 2 plans. You WILL end up paying full price for the phone on the Device Payment Plan, where you can STOP making payments on a phone with the Edge Plan if you turn it in for another device.
Good luck.

Plor not generated for components during Heuristic planning run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for