Plug-in Intensify Pro for Lightroom 6

Hello,
I tried to import the plug-in Intensify Pro or Tonality Pro in Lightroom 6 but this is impossible they can not be selected.
What do I have to activate something new for Lightroom 6 ?

Hi Eric, and thank you very much for reading my question and for your reply!
My Macbook Pro is 2006, yes, I know, rather dated, and I'm running S Leopard. My entire HD is only 80 Gig! And as I do my research, saving, and music files on the computer, you can imagine how full it is.
I spent over an hour last night transferring some files to external HD (to be accurate it is a flash drive!!) and created more space. Lo and behold, the Adobe Flash Player miraculously recovered, and is playing now like a champ!
You can point out that I'm running dangerously low on free space on my computer. Yes, I know that! I could increase the HD space, but I think before I do that, it's really time to get a new computer!
So relieved that the problem resolved itself. I did not get a warning window telling me I was running very low on free space, but I'd gotten that warning several times recently, so I trouble shot and thought space was the issue. Yes! I write this in case someone else has the same issue - easily resolved.
Thanks again for taking time to reply!
Maggie Harpcat

Similar Messages

Macbook pro for lightroom editing?

Hi all
I am considering buying a 15 inch macbook pro with retina display to edit my pics in Lightroom but have some questions.
I know that laptops are not ideal for photo editing but while I am a serious-ish photographer, I am not a professional and, after a long day's work at a desk, I like to edit my photos sitting on a sofa at night!
I would prefer 17 inches to 15.4 but apple don't do 17 inches any more, yet I am inclining towards apple for four reasons: (a) I hear they're fast, (b) I hear the screens are great for picture editing, (c) I've had various frustrations with windows over the years, and (d) windows 8 in particular looks counter-intuitive.
But if I do go apple that will be a big change for me since I've so far been using a Dell Inspiron 1720 (1920 x 1080 resolution), which I've liked, though it's 7 years old and now sluggish.
I'd REALLY appreciate for any advice regarding any or all of the following questions -- thanks VERY much for your time in advance!
1. Is the macbook pro really a good deal better than the competition, regarding in particular its screen and speed? (It better be for the money!) One photographer told me she didn't like the retina display because it meant things looked very different on the screen compared with when printed. Is that right and a worry?
2. I take it that, as someone with a LR for pc license, I don't need to pay more to install LR for mac on it?
3. I take it that it would be straightforward transferring my pics and catalog from a pc to a mac?
4. While I am inclined to get the 1TB storage I could get less if I used an external hdd (whcih would also have the upside that my wife could edit our catalog on her computer without needing to borrow mine), but I take it that would slow the macbook down: both because an xhdd won't be as quick as a SSD, and because the link between xhdd and macbook would slow things down? If so, it seems silly to pay for the speed and then lose it by attaching an xhdd. Does that seem right? (I take it one day we'll all edit our pics in the cloud, e.g. using dropbox, but currently that would be very sluggish I am assuming.)
5. I could always attach an external monitor, I take it, if I decided that sometimes I needed something bigger than 15.4". Yes?
6. Importantly, it is cheaper for me to buy the macbook in the US. Are there signficant downsides to buying a laptop for UK in US (e.g. different keyboard layout, inapplicable warranty, different power cord, etc)?
7. Finally, if I don't go for the apple, what alternative would you recommend? I hear dell xps are good (though also max 15"). Also heard good things about HP envy. The equivalent to my Dell, which I've liked, is I think the Dell 17R SE. Any views?
Thank you in advance SO much. I appreciate this is a lot of questions, but any advice you have under any of them would be REALLY appreciated.
Thanks again
David

You are welcome. Just finished a chat session with an Apple support rep and confirmed the matte option no longer available. Seems lots has changed since I bought my 17” 19 months back:). They did say that there were after market screen films available from places like amazon
Have never used anything like that though. My wife has a 2008 MBP 15” with gloss and I can say it is a nice screen finish, you just have to be careful of lighting from behind you. All my iMacs were glossy and I did learn to compensate for the added brilliance the screen brought to the photos. The new soft proofing feature of LR5 seems to better estimate the level of brightness of the printed work, compared to past versions of the s/ware.
In any case, in my opinion you really can’t go wrong with the apple product. I bought my first iMac in mid 1999 and have never looked back. I donated that machine to a pre-school in 2008, it was running OSX version 2 or 3 I think. I did run Photoshop 7.0 on an IBM laptop for a time (windows XP). I think I had one of the very first versions of Adobe Camera Raw on that machine. I digress, sorry.
The chat representative did confirm that the 17” is out of production and I’m guessing Apple found the market for the big laptop just wasn’t there. They did mention that 17” MBP’s show up as “certified refurbished” units from time to time. Suggest you might explore that option with a local Apple store in the UK, assuming Apple has store front operations off this continent of course.
Please feel free to contact me with further questions if you wish.
Take care, Gordy

Which macbook pro for lightroom and photoshop

Have my eye on the two 15" models. One with Intel iris pro graphics, the other that also has the nvidia gt 750m. Maybe I'm making mountains from molehills. You can tell me if you think that's the case
I will use my laptop at home always attached to a large screen. It's what I do with my current, April 2008 macbook pro. Right now a 25" NEC. I may add an additional screen as well, so I might have two screens besides the laptop, one attached via hdmi.
Right now I don't do video work. No gaming concerns for me. Photoshop and Lightroom the bulk of my work. 70,000 image Lr catalog. Large size photoshop files. Well near 1 gb sometimes with several layers.
If I buy the mbp with just the intel iris pro graphics card I'm thinking to upgrade processor to 2.5ghz. Will also upgrade ssd to 500gb. Or do I need, will I benefit from the nvidia card and card switching, dgpu?
I've just been reading about problems with the discrete graphics card version. Problems with freezing video, some with problems looking at certain websites via a browser firefox or safari. I wonder if that's only with older versions of the mbp.
And that the mbp with the dgpu, the nvidia gt 750m always uses that card when there is an external monitor attached. Creates additional heat for the computer.
Just looking for some advice before i hand over the cash. There is only a 100 difference in price so in the end I'm not concerned about cost. Just want a computer to do what I need, do it well, and for me to have as few problems as possible. I do like to keep my computers a long time. This current mbp is seven years old in a month. The computer I had before that, a G4, lasted me eight years.
thanks for advice...

The 2.6 Haswell i7 processor should be just fine - you really don't need the faster processors. Since Lightroom caches so much, though, it would be nice to keep most of that in RAM - much faster than writing/reading to a flash storage device - so I would recommend 16GB of RAM as you cannot ever upgrade the RAM on your own (or even through Apple).
You should be able to do anything on your MacBook Pro as on your iMac - albeit on a smaller screen!
Clinton
MacBook Pro (15” Late 2011), OS X 10.??, 16GB Crucial RAM, 960GB M500 Crucial SSD, 27” Apple Thunderbolt Display

Best macbook pro for lightroom 5 and CS photoshop

I have lightroom 5 and CS photoshop and am about to buy one of the new 13" macbook pro. Which is the best one for these applications

You are welcome. Just finished a chat session with an Apple support rep and confirmed the matte option no longer available. Seems lots has changed since I bought my 17” 19 months back:). They did say that there were after market screen films available from places like amazon
Have never used anything like that though. My wife has a 2008 MBP 15” with gloss and I can say it is a nice screen finish, you just have to be careful of lighting from behind you. All my iMacs were glossy and I did learn to compensate for the added brilliance the screen brought to the photos. The new soft proofing feature of LR5 seems to better estimate the level of brightness of the printed work, compared to past versions of the s/ware.
In any case, in my opinion you really can’t go wrong with the apple product. I bought my first iMac in mid 1999 and have never looked back. I donated that machine to a pre-school in 2008, it was running OSX version 2 or 3 I think. I did run Photoshop 7.0 on an IBM laptop for a time (windows XP). I think I had one of the very first versions of Adobe Camera Raw on that machine. I digress, sorry.
The chat representative did confirm that the 17” is out of production and I’m guessing Apple found the market for the big laptop just wasn’t there. They did mention that 17” MBP’s show up as “certified refurbished” units from time to time. Suggest you might explore that option with a local Apple store in the UK, assuming Apple has store front operations off this continent of course.
Please feel free to contact me with further questions if you wish.
Take care, Gordy

Building the ultimate Mac Pro for Lightroom

I am looking at upgrading my current Mac Pro or buying a new Mac Pro with the specific goal of making Lightroom faster.
My problem is that I use a PhaseOne P45+ back and rendering each file at 100% takes approximately 12 seconds. I could do a blanket 1:1 render but then my catalogue would be huge.
Here's my question; which part of my Mac Pro is most involved with the rendering?
Processors
RAM
Graphics card
Hard disk
I currently have a first generation Mac Pro and was thinking of either doing the following upgrade:
Increase ram from 7GB to 16GB.
Create a RAID 0 hard disk from 2 of the Intel X25M solid state drives (new G2 models) and have the catalogue and cache on that drive (obviously it will be backed up frequently)
Replace my graphics card with a Radeon 4870.
If I bought a new Mac Pro then I would still carryout the above modification but I would have the benefit of 8 cores instead of 4 and the RAM is faster. However, I am reluctant to spend the additional capital if the increase in performance is minimal.
My second question therefore is; does Lightroom 2.4 take full advantage of a new Mac Pro's 8 cores?
Thanks!

A single OWC Mercury Extreme Pro RE SSD will pretty much max out a SATA2 port so any caddy that puts two of those SSDs on one port becomes pointless.
There are two extra unused SATA ports on the motherboard that could be used with the Trans Intl. DX4 Mounting Station. This is probably your best option for maximizing as many of your internal SATA ports for storage HDs as possible.
I don't know if its true for the 2009 and later Mac Pros, but in the 2008 and earlier ones the limiting factor for RAID bandwidth was the Enterprise Southbridge Interface which was limited to 1 GB/s.
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/HardwareDrivers/Conc eptual/MacPro0704/Articles/arch.html
Message was edited by: Martin Pace

Iweb 08 and SlideShow Pro 1.0.3 plugin for Lightroom 1.3.1

I have an iweb site I did last year using iweb 06 and slide show pro with the iphoto plugin and then used the slide show pro in Flash. www.mattmosher.com
That worked great just paste the html code into the exported iweb site and put the slide show folder and swf file in the folder and it worked great.
NOW
iweb 08 and slide show pro for lightroom gives you a realtime visuals of your slide show. Awesome plugin.
However when I paste the code into my html document the slide show does not show up. It also generates 2 swf files named loader and slideshow pro. Along with 2 xml files named param.xml, images.xml along with a js file swfobject.js
I really do not know how to fix the problem.
Does anyone have any knowledge on this topic???

I don't want to sound mean, but you should'nt have got any firmware updates from any other site other than Apple's or through iTunes, I'm afraid. I think that's where the problem has come from.

Basic Questions On List View Plug-in For Lightroom

I need some basic information about the List View Plug-in for Lightroom:
HERE ARE MY QUESTIONS:
I have 40-60 photos per folder. Can List View list that many files on successive pages?
Most of the time I have 15-30 keywords or keyword phrases listed per picture. If I could widen the column I could see all of them. If the column does not widen, will the keywords not shown still be there to be exported to an Excel column, and then shown?
The thumbnail pictures on the end of all the summary lines are cool, but can I delete them before exporting to Excel?
Thank You Very Much for any information about this Plugin,
THANK YOU,
Sandy

Your questions seemed to be asked without actually tried the trial of the plug-in. I did, just now, and from what I can tell, with only have 20 images to test with since that is the trial limitation:
1)      The number of rows is fixed, and you can use the slider at the top-right to move from one page to the next.
2)      The columns do not change width in the plug-in though what you can’t see still gets exported to Excel although I’d expect all the keywords to be in one Excel column, not one column each.
3)      There are several sizes of thumbnails that can be selected from, including None—this is new compared to the one screen-capture on the plug-in website, so setting None as the thumbnail size is how you’d prevent thumbnails from going to Excel. I tried exporting thumbnails and they were all broken images, so maybe it doesn’t actually work, or maybe there is a limitation in the trial mode.

Plug in for lightroom

What do I need to do in order to use a PS as a plug in in Lightroom?

Maybe my question was not correct. Let me explain what do I need. I have been using Lightroom and sometimes I would like to swich to PS to to use options not available in there. Hope, now you understand my question.Thank you for your time Baron06903
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:34:20 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: plug in for lightroom
    Re: plug in for lightroom
    created by Mylenium in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up - View the full discussion
What exactly? LR uses a different plug-in format than PS and you need to obtain the specicifc LR versions of whatever tools you have in mind... Mylenium
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4969871#4969871
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4969871#4969871
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4969871#4969871. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
     Start a new discussion in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

With Quicktime 7 Pro for Windows, is there a plug-in or add-on to have the screen recording capability?

With Quicktime 7 Pro for Windows, is there a plug-in or add-on to have the screen recording capability?

Screen recording is not a feature of QuickTime Player 7 Pro (Mac or Windows).
QuickTime X (ten) is Mac only software that does include screen recording features.

Leaving macbook pro plugged in to mains for two weeks

Hi,
I'm going away for a couple of weeks and want to set an "out of office" on my mail account.
I understand the laptop has to be switched on for this to happen, so i was thinking to set a schedule where my laptop will switch on and shut down each day.
Only query is battery. Obviously the battery isnt going to last for two weeks, so will leaving it constantly plugged into the mains for two weeks harm it? Are there any alternatives?
Thanks for any help.

bradleyjmiles21 wrote:
Hi,
I'm going away for a couple of weeks and want to set an "out of office" on my mail account.
Make the rule at the server end rather than the client. If this is an iCloud account login to the website and use the vacation responder provided, then you can just shut your Mac off and senders of email will get the response. Most other major email providers offer the same feature.

Plugging 2011 Macbook pro into my HDMI TV

Hello all. I am about to buy a 2011 13" Macbook Pro. My first Mac. I have done some reading on the mini display port and it's computability with HDMI. From what I've read it is also known as DP++ and it passes the signal straight through as HDMI with the use of an adapter. However, the audio is only passed through if the PC supports HDMI signaling, which I believe the 2009 Macbooks didn't. I don't know if that's since changed on the new models. I have read that you have to use an adapter then plug that into a cable with DVI on one end and HDMI on the other and then use a "y" cable for the audio plugged into your amp for sound. I have seen on a Display Port web page, what looked like an adapter with display port one side and HDMI the other, does this exist as it seems better than the DVI to HDMI approach.
So in summary
1) What's the best way to connect my 2011 Macbook Pro to my HDMI TV ?
2) Can I get the audio to the TV through the Display Port without having to use a Y cable from the Macs audio out ?
Thanks

Does the MiniDisplay -> HDMI adapter work with the new MacBook Pro (early 2011) ?
This thread describes some problems: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2180106

IPod error message when plugged into Macbook Pro

My iPod will charge to my Macbook Pro for a moment or so then I get an error message stating that "This device or accessory is not supported..yadda yadda yadda" I have never had this happen in the past. Does anyone know how to fix this?

T4,
Then the pods that you have seem not to electrically match with your Mac, as the others that you tried seemed ok, am I right in this understanding?
On the iPhone it has a very unique plug configuration that seems to set specifically for the iPhone, because it is a 4 conductor connector (one is for the microphone) that may make other pods not work properly. (yes this is an Apple thing, AAAAARRRRGGGG!!!!)
But that would then confirm that there is not anything wrong with your Mac, as those Apple pods are for the iPhone, I guess both good and bad news.
I don't use my iPhone to listen to music, nor do I use pods either, unless the artist I am working with is, then I use the same make and model so I can "hear what they hear".
I do pro audio for a living and I can understand this "crosstalk issue with the 4th connector"
But without getting too technical, it would seem your Mac is just fine, which is a good thing.
I would think that the newer Macs will be more compatible with the Apple iPhone pods, but they all seem to have their issues with the switching system...for years now!
Hope this helps you understand this "FRUIT FLY"
My suggestion is to use "regular headphones/ear pods with your Mac and the Apple iPhone pods with the phone. )I only have ever used the iPhone pods with the iPhone when I'm driving, and with only the iPhone. I have much better sounding pods/phones that I use to "ACTUALLY' listen to music with....and it a'int MP3/4
Peace SJP

GPU notes for Lightroom CC (2015)

Hi everyone,
I wanted to share some additional information regarding GPU support in Lr CC.
Lr can now use graphics processors (GPUs) to accelerate interactive image editing in Develop. A big reason that we started here is the recent development and increased availability of high-res displays, such as 4K and 5K monitors. To give you some numbers: a standard HD screen is 2 megapixels (MP), a MacBook Retina Pro 15" is 5 MP, a 4K display is 8 MP, and a 5K display is a whopping 15 MP. This means on a 4K display we need to render and display 4 times as many pixels as on a standard HD display. Using the GPU can provide a significant speedup (10x or more) on high-res displays. The bigger the screen, the bigger the win.
For example, on my test system with a 4K display, adjusting the White Balance and Exposure sliders in Lightroom 5.7 (without GPU support) is about 5 frames/second -- manageable, but choppy and hard to control. The same sliders in Lightroom 6.0 now run smoothly at 60 FPS.
So why doesn't everything feel faster?
Well, GPUs can be enormously helpful in speeding up many tasks. But they're complex and involve some tradeoffs, which I'd like to take a moment to explain.
First, rewriting software to take full advantage of GPUs is a lot of work and takes time. Especially for software like Lightroom, which offers a rich feature set developed over many years and release versions. So the first tradeoff is that, for this particular version of Lightroom, we weren't able to take advantage of the GPU to speed up everything. Given our limited time, we needed to pick and choose specific areas of Lightroom to optimize. The area that I started with was interactive image editing in Develop, and even then, I didn't manage to speed up everything yet (more on this later).
Second, GPUs are marvelous at high-speed computation, but there's some overhead. For example, it takes time to get data from the main processor (CPU) over to the GPU. In the case of high-res images and big screens, that can take a LOT of time. This means that some operations may actually take longer when using the GPU, such as the time to load the full-resolution image, and the time to switch from one image to another.
Third, GPUs aren't best for everything. For example, decompressing sequential bits of data from a file -- like most raw files, for instance -- sees little to no benefit from a GPU implementation.
Fourth, Lightroom has a sophisticated raw processing pipeline (such as tone mapping HDR images with Highlights and Shadows), and running this efficiently on a GPU requires a fairly powerful GPU. Cards that may work with in the Photoshop app itself may not necessarily work with Lightroom. While cards that are 4 to 5 years old may technically work, they may provide little to no benefit over the regular CPU when processing images in Lr, and in some cases may be slower. Higher-end GPUs from the last 2 to 3 years should work better.
So let's clear up what's currently GPU accelerated in Lr CC and what's not:
First of all, Develop is the only module that currently has GPU acceleration whatsoever. This means that other functions and modules, such as Library, Export, and Quick Develop, do not use the GPU (performance should be the same for those functions regardless of whether you have GPU enabled or disabled in the prefs).
Within Develop, most image editing controls have full GPU acceleration, including the basic and tone panel, panning and zooming, crop and straighten, lens corrections, gradients, and radial filter. Some controls, such as local brush adjustments and spot clone/heal, do not -- at least, not yet.
While the above description may be disappointing to some of you, let's be clear: This is the beginning of the GPU story for Lightroom, not the end. The vision here is to expand our use of the GPU and other technologies over time to improve performance. I know that many photographers have been asking us for improved performance for a long time, and we're trying to respond to that. Please understand this is a big step in that direction, but it's just the first step. The rest of it will take some time.
Summary:
1. GPU support is currently available in Develop only.
2. Most (but not all) Develop controls benefit from GPU acceleration.
3. Using the GPU involves some overhead (there's no free lunch). This may make some operations take longer, such as image-to-image switching or zooming to 1:1. Newer GPUs and computer systems minimize this overhead.
4. The GPU performance improvement in Develop is more noticeable on higher-resolution displays such as 4K. The bigger the display, the bigger the win.
5. Prefer newer GPUs (faster models within the last 3 years). Lightroom may technically work on older GPUs (4 to 5 years old) but likely will not benefit much. At least 1 GB of GPU memory. 2 GB is better.
6. We're currently investigating using GPUs and other technologies to improve performance in Develop and other areas of the app going forward.
The above notes also apply to Camera Raw 9.0 for Photoshop/Bridge CC.
Eric Chan
Camera Raw Engineer

I posted the following information on the Luminous Landscape forum (GPU used in Develop but not Library?) in response to comments you made there.
I am very puzzled by the extremely blurry image in the second screen capture when the GPU is enabled.
OS X (10.9.5)
Hardware configuration:
   MacPro (late 2013)
   AMD FirePro D300 2048 MB
   Apple Cinema Display 1920 x 1200
   16 GB RAM
   1 TB SSD
Test file: Nikon D800 NEF, 50 MB
(0) open the Develop module
(1) select a different NEF file and zoom to 1:1
(2) clear the ACR cache
(3) select the test file
(4) take 3 screenshots to illustrate the 3 display states (the first one is hard to capture)
(5) select another image
(6) same 3 states are present
(7) return to the test file and the same 3 display states are present
   Why isn’t the ACR cache coming into play in step 7?
If I repeat this process with the GPU disabled the image is displayed without the intermediate states.
I have attached the 3 screenshots mentioned in step (4).

Are there new updates for camera raw for Lightroom 4, or only for Lightroom 5, as in 5.3 ?

Are there new updates for camera raw for Lightroom 4, or only for Lightroom 5, as in 5.3 ?

There will be no further camera support updates for Lightroom 4 beyond what is already listed in this table.
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
Only current versions of Lightroom (currently Lightroom 5.3) will have further camera support added.
If you need to work with Raw files from new cameras you'll either have to upgrade to Lightroom 5 or join the Photoshop Photography Program (to get PC CC + LR5 + extras) or convert to DNG using Adobe's free DNG converter.

Sony RAW file conversion for Lightroom 5

I've been using Lightroom 5 (LR5) for my photo editing on a PC for a year now & been shooting with Nikon, just recently purchased a Sony A7II & LR5 will not read the RAW files, when I try it says: "The files are not recognized by the raw format in Lightroom 5", Please check for updated version of Lightroom, so I checked & I do have the current version, no updates available. I was previously told it would read it & there shouldn't be a problem, well it won't. From what I've read looks like I need to convert these RAW files to DNG through a plug-in. When I went to 'Adobe Support & Community Help' I found what I was looking (I think) a plug-in for LR5, however when you open the link at the top its says: 'Camera Raw plug-in for CS6, CC, or CC 2014 Adobe applications' doesn't mention anything about LR5, but it did on the previous search page so I'm a little confused. Attached is the link: Camera Raw plug-in installer
Is this it for LR5, 'CameraRaw_8_7_1.zip' ? And if so why doesn't it say for LR5, anyone know? I don't want to download something and have it screw up my LR5 program. Any help here would be greatly appreciated....jp

I have Lightroom 5.7. When I check for updates I show its up to date, I don't understand, whenever there are updates its always advised me, I started with Lightroom 5. Was that link to 5.7.1 on my post correct for this update? Like I said it didn't say for Lightroom 5 just Photo Shop CS6,CC, or CC 2014, so I was a bit confused, wouldn't be an issue if Lightroom 5 was included in the text.

Plug-in Intensify Pro for Lightroom 6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for