Plugin PS CS5 for Olympus Pen E-P5

Is there a plugin for PS CS5 for Raw pictures taken with an Olympus Pen E-P5?

Not yet according to Adobe's list
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
When Camera Raw is eventually updated for this camera, the plugin will not be compatible with CS5.
It'll be for CS6 (maybe) and CC only.
If you choose to stay with CS5 (and not upgrade) then you'll have to download the free Adobe DNG converter and convert the Pen E-P5 Raw files to DNGs then edit the DNGs in CS5.
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html

Similar Messages

Convert raw files for olympus pen camera in aperture

When will Aperture support Olympus ORF raw files?

Good question. Apple's web site says that the Pen EP-1 & EPL-1 are supported, but I can't import any of my ORF files. Aperture hangs up when "Processing"

Hi there, when will there be a support for the Olympus PEN E-PL7?

Hi there, when will there be a support for the Olympus PEN E-PL7?

It is on our radar and hoping to add it in an upcoming update.
As soon as it is available, it will be updated in the below article. Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
~ Arpit

Plugins and twain for CS5

I spent four hours trying to find the plugins and twain drivers for CS5 that the "read me" file for CS5 said was available for download. They even gave a link for them. Finally called them and spent another hour and and a half on the phone and was transferred three times just to find out they have not put them online yet. THANKS GUYS. Why don't you put them up "before" telling people that they are there.
Also, why were these features taken out. It is kind of like buying a new car and when they deliver it the radio is missing and they tell you to come back in a couple of days and look in the back of the parking lot for it and put it in yourself. Then when you you can't find they say "oops, we forgot to put it there."
Anyway does any one know when "picture package, web photo gallery, twain and other old wonderfull plugins" are going to be available?
If you use these features you might as well wait to buy CS5!

That's really the point--the problem isn't so much that Adobe didn't have the TWAIN/extras plugin pack ready to go at CS5 launch (though I'd much rather they did), it's that the most obvious link to said pack:
http://www.adobe.com/go/ps_cs5_plugins_mac_en
...doesn't lead to a placeholder page that says "These plugins aren't available yet, please be patient." ...or better yet "...fill out this form to get an email when they are ready for download." Heck, it doesn't even lead to a 404--it immediately (and confusingly) redirects to the Adobe home page. It's that an official URL for the product exists and is linked from more than one place, but doesn't have anything there to tell people what's up when they use the built-in Help feature and click on it.
Thus, when I did a search from within CS5 for TWAIN, it came up with an article that answered my question exactly. I clicked the link, and ended up at the Adobe home page. "Huh? Oh, I guess I have to search for it myself..." A half hour wasted later I finally surmised that, indeed, it just wasn't available for download yet. Launch weekend, I suppose that's understandable. A week later, I'd at least expect a placeholder. (And I never did find the above-linked document that does explain what's up in my own searching--I just got the helpful-but-useless help page I linked).
I also wish I'd known about this before I started my 30 day trial; for all I know it's going to be over a month before the plugin is ready, which would mean I would have to buy CS5 without having any idea whether the TWAIN interface is going to be so crash-prone as to be useless, or just fine.

HT201070 Olympus PEN E-P5 RAW files .ORF

Hi,
does anyone now when or if it is posible to watch thumbs or even images in preview taken with a Olympus PEN E-P5.. it kind of *** to not be able to see the images in finder or in preview, noe i have to open them randomly in Adobe Photoshop CC who can take those files with out problems...
BR
http://rust.se

Not yet according to Adobe's list
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
When Camera Raw is eventually updated for this camera, the plugin will not be compatible with CS5.
It'll be for CS6 (maybe) and CC only.
If you choose to stay with CS5 (and not upgrade) then you'll have to download the free Adobe DNG converter and convert the Pen E-P5 Raw files to DNGs then edit the DNGs in CS5.
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html

"Sliding Boxes" wipe transition in Premiere CS5 for Mac?

Hi, I have a fairly simple question. Can anyone verify that the wipe transition "sliding boxes" is available in Premiere CS5 for Mac? It wasn't in Premiere CS4 for Mac, it only featured in the Windows version....
Thanks!

Hi,
Just dit a check of the 'sliding boxes' in CS5.5, but didn't found it.
However do you know about the new plugins from FilmImpact.net?
These are great quality transitions for Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5.
They are freely available for Windows & Mac!
Cheers,
Jaap

Plugins bring cs5 to stand still

I am using the latest updated version of cs5, my os is windows64 bit. My problem is that any extension like tych panel or plugin like pixel bender brings photoshopto a crawl. It does not matter if it is a large or small photo, as soon as i open the plugin (pixel bender for example) it slows everything down. I am running filters from Topaz and there is no problem. Just wondering if anybody has had this problem and may know how to fix it.

Thanx Mylenium I believe you are right. Although, it was not obviuos to me, as I have had no real dealing with graphics cards before this I did not even think of it. I always read when photoshop is slow it is due to lack of ram, which I corrected last year.
Thanx again

Buying Photoshop CS5 for mac and being able to use it?

I'm a Photography student and I need to get Photoshop, though I can only just about afford around £300. I don't want to rent it through Creative Cloud because not only will it cost me far too much after the amount of time I need it for is up, but I will no longer have it when my course is finished, which seems a shame since I'll not be able to use my education there after. Anyway, I've been looking into buying CS5 for mac as a Student/Teacher version, which is in my price range and has all of the ideal tools I need and then some.
My main worry is, I don't know how it works. Will Adobe still accept the license number for an old version, or will they turn it down in the hope that I'll turn to take on their Creative Cloud malarkey? I've found a seemingly good deal on Amazon, though the occasional review describes that Adobe aren't accepting their serial numbers. Saying that, the majority of reviews say that it installs fine with little hassle, so I'm not too sure on how it would treat me. I'm in England, incase that would affect anything. Any clues anyone?

You can do almost anything in Photoshop Elements that you can do in Photoshop. There are many third party plugins, some free, that will add functionality both to Photoshop and Photoshop Elements. I use both Photoshop CS5.5 and Photoshop Elements 5, 9, and 11 on various computers. Expert Mode in Photoshop Elements is most like Photoshop.
Why don't you download the trial of Photoshop Elements 13 and decide for yourself:
FAQ, common questions & answers | Adobe Photoshop Elements 13
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_elements&loc=us&sdid=KSNQY

Profile Editor and Olympus Pen E-P2

The DNG Profile Editor don't recognize DNG Files converted from Olympus Pen E-P2 ORF files.
I have used the latest DNG converter 5.6.0.148 and the DNG files I have obtained can be open in Lightroom 3 beta. But the profile editor can't open them.
I have used the Profile editor for several Olympus cameras without any problem.

I have found a solution : I open the dng file version 5.6 with Camera raw 5.6 and I choose to save the image using and older version (4.1 for exemple).
The dng file that I obtain can then be opened with the Profile editor.
It seems that the Profile Editor must be upgraded for the new version of DNG.

Olympus pen ep-1 raw support

Hi i just buy an olympus pen ep-1 , who seams to buy a very succesfull camera
i would like to know if it's exist a camera raw support for this camera at this time ?
and if not how long must we waiting for it ?
thanks for ur help

Strange. Hmm, well I don't know the answer then.
I suppose it's possible that when you set the backwards compatibility to DNG
1.1 or 1.2, you are getting linear DNGs created from the E-P1 files, and
that Aperture does not support reading linear DNGs.
In any case, I am reasonably confident that the DNGs produced by Camera Raw
5.5 RC and DNG Converter 5.5 RC from the E-P1 .ORF files are valid DNGs.
Hence there is not much that we can do.
I maintain that if you wish to resolve this, you need to follow up with
Apple.
Eric
Same thing happens when I set DNG Converter to use DNG 1.1S
Well, I guess I'll continue using Capture One for the 30 days of the trying
periodS After that, I'll have to shoot in JPG
Because if I have to wait for Apple, I'll wait for a long long timeS

Porting of CS4 Plugin into CS5 on Mac 10.6

Hello All,
I am new to Photoshop and I am trying to Port the CS4 Plugin into CS5. On Mac OS 10.5 it gets compiled properly without any major changes but the menus does not load into Photoshop menus. On Mac OS 10.6 I am facing the proplem comiling the code itself.
Can any one help me on this. What wrong I am doing or have I missed anything. I also tried to compare my code with Outboud Sample project. There is no major difference. Still why is it not getting loaded?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards
Farzana.

What platform are you compiling to and what platform is your machine?
Check your .r file and your PiPL resource and your configuration.
Are the the CS5 SDK projects working when you run them on Photoshop CS5?
You should have something like this in your PiPL resource.
#ifdef __PIMac__
          #if (defined(__i386__))
                    CodeMacIntel32 { "PluginMain" },
                    /* If your plugin uses Objective-C, Cocoa, for UI it should not be
                       unloaded, this flag is valid for 32 bit plug-ins only and
                 should not be used in any windows section */
                    // off for now as this plug-in has no Objective-C Cocoa {},
          #endif
          #if (defined(__x86_64__))
                    CodeMacIntel64 { "PluginMain" },
          #endif
#else
          #if defined(_WIN64)
                    CodeWin64X86 { "PluginMain" },
          #else
                    CodeWin32X86 { "PluginMain" },
          #endif
#endif

How do I switch plugins from CS5 to CS6?

How do i switch plugins from CS5 to CS6?

Welcome to the forum Steven,
Do you have specific ones you wish to migrate?
I think with CS6 I believe the underlying architecture for plugins was changed, so you may wish to check with the makers to see if they have CS6 compatible update versions available.
I think some had to be re-written under the new framework to be compatible under CS6.

Using VST plugins and ASIO for everything?

Just a thought. Oh how much I'd like this!
To be able to use universal VST plugins and ASIO for everything directly from Windows would be ideal. To put this simply, making the Creative Windows "mixer" a true equivelent of a pro-software mixing app (Ableton, ProTools, Sonar, Cubase, or any other) in terms of absolute control for all Audio effects and I/O.
If Creative won't ever do this even on their next gen cards, somebody or some company that knows a decent mixer setup should write such a replacement mixer soon offered at a fair price (if not free) that will do so with easy, complete, reliable integration.
Long and specific
VST related:
- Use X-Ram to cache inserted VST plugins. Now theres a potential great reason for it since it obviously doesnt use any to cache the I/O bus like ALL OTHER periphials that have Ram caches. Its use is dictated by software, so why not?
- Allow setting some tiny but likely necessary amount of X-Ram as an additional plugin audio I/O buffer. This should be much less than what mixing software needs for this setting since that would all have to pass the CPU.
- Use Creative's processing hardware directly instead of the CPU so VST plugins won't increase CPU usage (within reason of course).
- Yield overhead when using lots or higher-demand plugins if set in bit-match mode. Why waste all that power for SRC when Voxengo R8Brain or plenty of other pro software can do that a million times better and way faster in non-real-time? OK, only Creative could work this one in.
- Why VST plugins? I'd trust my favorite EQ, digital limiter or whatever that has 64-bit float internal precision and oversampling vs. a 24-bit (rounding-error heaven) with no oversampling like the built in Creative ones.
- If Creative has confidence in the quality of their own propriety effects, doesn't have to be VST but simply making them usable as a ReWire bridged devices into most any host with parameter automation controls and all. Obviosly these could have much lower latency than VST that normally relies on CPU processed software code.
- The only argument against this is that some VST plugins have huge latencies. Optional latency delay to keep tracks
- Allow Creatives hardware to insert as a ReWire slave or otherwise bridged device to ASIO-based apps so VST's can be outsourced from demanding more CPU when mixing. I could also add MIDI plugin effects as well.
ASIO related:
- Allow changing any and all audio I/O routing for individual channels on the fly for Windows and ANY software (not just ASIO compatible stuff). Just like in Ableton, Pro Tools, and every other WELL designed "mixer".
- Treating XP itself and any software that normally goes through DX/MME/etc to use this ASIO mixer by making it appear as an insert send/return in the mixer so it can get routed and processed individually to my liking.
- Can insert send/return signals for any DX/MME/etc program to/from any track or #tracks in any combination up to some reasonable limit with pre/post gains. At least several send/returns slots per channel.
- A game that uses ASIO would be sweet. 0% FPS drop. IMO DX/MME/wave-mapper sound sucks. No control, many wasted CPU cycles, and horrible latency.
- Ability to save/load PROGRAM-specific routing chains. Having it so simly running a certain program will automatically insert it how/whereever I specified, if not default, with all relevant I/O settings, including plugins and related settings that were put in the insert send/return path series to that program of course.
- Put real-time SRC, compression encoding/decoding, or any Creative effects as well whereever I want in the signal chain, whether universal to a track I/O or program insert send/return I/O.
- Ability to record tracks or the master likewise.
- No digital feedback possible caused by monitering/recording/routing configs that would be possible in any decent mixing software. Surely not ever from a default setting or made sometimes impossible to prevent like on the Audigy series. Well unless I do something stupid that SHOULD cause feedback. Speak of a truly worthless mixer, this BTW is the ONLY reason I couldn't just go the manual route and run my host all the time, forcing ALL sounds through it for real-time playback with my Audigy. I'm assuming XiFi's Audio-Creation Mixer doesn't have this horrible problem.
- Imagine putting any combination of sounds in 7.1 surround, monitering specific channels to any physical output, or up/downmixing 5.1 as it plays in real-time, etc. any thing like this possible instantly with a few mouse clicks! This would be SO EASY and completely possible to implement, most of the above right onto existing XiFi's as is.
It's not like it would be competing with pro-interface rackmount products so no harm to Creative. I sure as h*ll wouldn't record with any soundcard's analog pre's or unbalanced connections for that matter. Guess I just love the interface and control of a REAL mixer that can do it all.

cusis wrote:
But would it be possible to somehow use the power of the card to take on some of the load of the cpu, users would surely then see alot more benifits from these cards.
I don't see why this isn't possible with enough X-RAM. Why no host apps support offloading VST plugin cache buffers and rendering threads to it? I'm probly returning my XiFi and sticking with my old Audigy 1 until either I blow it up or Creative makes a REAL upgrade with most the aforementioned features that literally COULD'VE been implemented in XiFi's current hardware.
If they do, they'll have my business and many others I'm pretty sure. Creative, if your listening and you want to like triple your sales - PLEASE get a clue and get the software end right. Microsoft or any audio host software developers, heres your (fat) chance if Creative wont do whats really their responsibility.
If ALL apps were forced to pass through ASIO as I mentioned, this could force all apps and games to use part of X-RAM as an I/O buffer no matter what specific support is. The same way a video card can offload ALL video including Windows, not just when running certain games, or even worse, certain audio apps lol that specifically support video RAM and DX performance controls! That would be the stupidest, most worthless idea and why Video Cards don't waste their hardware this way. And yet this is what XiFi currently does regarding audio. Somebody change this SOON.
This would be SO cheap and easy for Creative toss together and implement and would solve EVERYONE's problems and make ALL games at least get SMOOTH AUDIO. He!! Creative could charge $30 extra for it or just push out a new line of cards and itd still be worth it. Creative, did you read that part? More profit$$$ Like a video card upgrade, I EXPECT a night vs. day improvment but as it stands, XiFi is simply a glorified Audigy that costs more but much LESS likely to work right.
More importantly, its use of ASIO (the real deal) remains no less limited than an old Creative card from way back when. If Creative wants their soundcard to integrate with software better, learn from Nvidia/Ati and deliver the goods as they've done it all along.

I have CS5 for my laptop and want to use it on my Mac too. Do I need to buy a separate license?

I purchased CS5 for my laptop and now want to use it on my Mac book too. Do I need to buy a separate license?

Serial numbers are platform specific. You cannot use a PC license on Mac and vice versa. You would need to run a platform swap to use it on a Mac and upgrade to CS6, but then would lose the PC license. Therefore you eitehr need to buy a separate license for the Mac or join Creative Cloud.
Mylenium

Is there a way to transfer Aperture files to Photoshop CS5 for editing?

Is there a way to transfer Aperture files to Photoshop CS5 for editing? I recently had a crash of CS5 Bridge. It seems to have caused a problem with Aperture. So, I reinstalled both CS5 and Aperture. Before installing CS5 I uploaded NEF (Nikon RAW) files to Aperture. Now I have reinstalled CS5 I want to use it to edit the same photos from Aperture, as I know more about editing in CS5 than Aperture. I tried to export to CS5 but, Aperture would not give me that option. At least I could not find it.

You can set an external editor in the "Aperture Preferences -> Export " settings.
Just set this to CS5.
The resullt of your external edit will create a new version of your image.

Plugin PS CS5 for Olympus Pen E-P5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for