PM order settlement steps

Hi,
I have a basic question regarding PM order settlement. I know that for PP orders, following are the settlement steps for individual processing.
1) After final confirmation of the order (status CNF) using IW41, do GR (IW8W for refurbishment order, etc). Status will now be DLV.
2) Technically complete the order (IW32-Order-Functions-Complete-Complete (technically). Order status is now TECO.
3) Actual overhead calculation - tran KGI2
4) WIP calculation - tran KKAX
5) Variance calculation - tran KKS2
6) Actual settlement - tran KO88.
Now for PM order, please tell whether steps 4 and 5 are relevant. Do we need to calculate WIP and variance for PM order? What are the exact steps to settle a PM order?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Abhijit

Hi
Please refer the link [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/b1/c04d28439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Rakesh

Similar Messages

Whatever the steps in order settlement

whatever the steps we have to do in order settlement(ko88).
pls let me know
Thanks,
Maran.d

Dear Maran
Plz Refer to Mr. Brahmankar inputs on settelment of order
You should follow following steps for Order Settlement after confirmation :
1. After Final Confirmation of Order ( Status : CNF) make GR for for order using Tcode : MIGO / MB31 so Production Order Status will be DLV.
2. Then complete the order technically by using Tcode : CO02--> Functions ( Menu)---> Restrict Processing -
> Technically Complete. You can carry out TECO for multiple Orders in Tcode : COHV (Mass Processing).
3.Now Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
CO43 - Collective Processing
4.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
KKAO - Collective Processing
5.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
KKS1 - Collective Processing
6.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
CO88 - Collective Processing
Added
in KO88, give ur order number
the settelment poriod as 6 for this month
and year as 2009 & execute
Hope this helps.
Regards,
kumar
Edited by: kumar kumar on Sep 10, 2009 2:26 PM

Sales Order Settlement to Only WBS

Hi,
I have scenario like Sales Order Settlement to only WBS in make to order.
Again from WBS settlement to COPA.
So far I know WBS settlement to COPA and I am not sure in the 1 st scenario.
Can you any body tell me where I need to configure, is it only settlement profile or any other settings required?
Thanks & Regards,
KBR

Hi,
What is the business rational to have a 2 step settlement to COPA?
Thank you and Regards,
Varshal Kachole

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

Hi Experts,
I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
CO43 - Collective Processing
2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
KKAO - Collective Processing
3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
KKS1 - Collective Processing
4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
CO88 - Collective Processing
I am not able to do these steps.
KGI2: the screen is appearing without any details,but there is no error message.
KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Dear,
Message no KD256??
You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
Check this OSS note 179533
Also check order previously settled?
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Production Order Settlement Process with respect to a Project

Hello All,
I know about normal Production Order Settlement Process in discrete industries.
Can anyone give me the steps for the Production Order Settlement Process if the Production Order is created with respect to a Project in SAP PP- PS Integration Scenario.
Thanks in advance for your support.

Hi Experts,
Can anyone clarify my above queries.
Thanks in advance for your support

Order Settlement Process in Discrete/Project

Hi,
a)I would like to know the Production Order Settlement Process in Discrete Industries and for a Production Order with respect to a Project.
B) What configuration steps are required to do the Production Order Settlement?
c) I have completed Confirmation of the Production Order and "Delivery Completed" indicator is marked in Goods Receipt Tab of the PRoduction Order.
Can anyone tell me the steps to be followed one by one to do the Production Order Settlement.
d) From where we can check whether Production ORder Settlement Rule is created or not?. What configuration steps are required to create this rule for a Production order and what steps are to be performed after this rule is created.
Appreciate if someone provide me inputs to my above queries.
Thanks in advance for your support.

Hi,
Find the answers for your questions..
a)I would like to know the Production Order Settlement Process in Discrete Industries and for a Production Order with respect to a Project.
After all PP activities are done production order techo is done... then controlling people will do following activities..
Variance calculation - KKS2
Settlement - KO88
B) What configuration steps are required to do the Production Order Settlement?
For this lot of configuration is required from controlling module..check with FI/CO consultant on this..from PP side they will give settlement profile..you need to maintain this in order type configuration on OPJH
c) I have completed Confirmation of the Production Order and "Delivery Completed" indicator is marked in Goods Receipt Tab of the PRoduction Order.
Can anyone tell me the steps to be followed one by one to do the Production Order Settlement.
you need to change the status of the order to TECO then inform controlling they will do following activities...
Variance calculation - KKS2
Settlement - KO88
d) From where we can check whether Production ORder Settlement Rule is created or not?. What configuration steps are required to create this rule for a Production order and what steps are to be performed after this rule is created.
in the order header status you can see settlement rule is created or not. It will have the status SETC. Settlement rule is created during order creation stage only..no separate configuration required for this..
Hope this helps...
Thanks
Kumar

Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

We have issue with order settlement during the month end. We have process orders that run over the week (thus will run over the month-end), with REL, PCNF, and PDLV status at the month end. Production does not want to close/ TECO those orders, as we are not yet done. But FI wants to settle them for the month end.
1) Can FI settle those REL work orders, as mentioned before?
This is what I found:
2) The standard practice is TECO, is to set before closing the order.
3) You can only perform (business) closing for a process order if (CLSD):
The order has status Released (REL), Control recipe created (CRCR) or Control recipe discarded (CRAB), or Technically completed (TECO). To have status Technically completed, the order must have already reached status Released.
The order balance is 0.
There are no more open purchase requisitions, orders, or commitments for it.
All data related to the process order is available and correct (For example, the inspection lots for the order must be completed).
There are no future change records from the confirmation processes
2) So, if statement 1) is correct, is this correct lifeycle:
A.     Settlement at month end for all orders with REL status.
B.      TECO after settlement, and also after DLV and CNF status.
C.      Close after TECO.
Upload in your comments, if there is any link.
Thanks, points will be rewarded.

Hi Abi,
Since the Process order is in uncompleted stage and partially delivered to stock, still it has WIP to be delivered to stock.
Calculate the WIP value & settle the order in Month end.
Prerequisite for WIP calculation is order should has REL status.
In month end for Uncompleted order , calculate WIP value & settle the Order.
General steps for month end practice:
Over head calculation
WIP calculation
Variance calculation - Once the Order receives - DLV /TECO status.
Order settlement.
Order closing
Regards
Pradeep

Define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G

Hi Experts,
I need to define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G transaction code.
Here are the requirements
1. The job should run on weekly basis automatically.
2. The settlement period and posting period should be taken care by the job dynamically. i.e. if the job runs in July, the job should pick up Settlement period and posting period as 7 automatically.
Kindly let me know the steps to define the back ground job as per above requirement.
Sanjeev

To run the KO8G each week, the a RECURRING job has to be created. At my job, Basis/Ops department would create and schedule the job.
To have the posting periods, dates etc dynamically determined at the time the job runs:
Create the variant and save.
In 5.0, KO8G does not save a variant, therefore, go to SE38 and create a variant for program: RKO7KO8G
When you go to the ATTRIBUTES screen, to add a name and description, you will see a list of all the fields that are part of the selection criteria.
For an example, I frequently use the Posting Date. To the right of the screen is a field called Selection Variable, click on the drop box and select D - Dynamic Date Calculation.
Go to field NAme of variable, click on drop box and select the variable you want.
Each field has its own list of selection variable and name of variable depending on how it works in the progra.
If you look at Posting period you will see:
T: Table Variable from TVARVC
B: User-defined variables
I do not know about User defined variables, but for TVARC there is thread that leads to a "how to" blog
[How create a variable in the TVARVC that calculate the last week]
do some more searching and you should find more answers
Good luck
Althea

Internal Order Settlement Reversal Prior Year KO88

Hi,
I am on ECC 6.   We have been asked if it is possible to reverse prior year settlements for internal orders in the current year and period.                                                                The current year reversals are not the issue. These orders settlements in need of revision were made in the prior year and the periods are all closed and not to be opened as the financials are complete for that year.
Presently, there are two steps : 1) Reverse the current year periods and resettle using revised settlement rules.in the current year open period.                                                                                2) Prior year corrections made through a manual journal entry also posted in the current period.
Goal is to eliminate the manaul entry for prior year correction due to revised order settlement rules
Any thoughts on this issue would be appreciated.

The only reason to resettle the orders is that the "settlement rules" were revised in the current fiscal year . In the current fiscal year , the settlements for each settled period (closed period) are reversed and then resettled in the current open period using the revised settlement rules. However, the issue involves these same orders had costs in the previous fiscal year and were settled originally in that previous fiscal year with the old settlement rules. This is a closed fiscal year and all periods are closed.
Any thoughts on a system approach to effect the settlement rule change crossing two fiscal years rather than manual entries for prior fiscal year settlement rule impact as a two step process the first step being the current fiscal year resettlements and the second step the manual entry for previous year impact ?

Customer service Order settlement

Resource related billing.
I created a Service Order. I finished all the steps from Create Order to Billing VF01.
Next Service Order Settlement. I did not activate Profitability. I freezed the settlement profiles and allocation structure.
I configured the settlement to Sales document item.
I cannot settle the order. if I give Sales document also in settlement rule order is not accepting.
Suggest.

Error message.
Maintain the settlement rule of the sender.
I have maintained the settlement rule. I have assigned a settlement cost element to receiver category as SDI.
I got the error message when i do settlement.

Collective orders settlement

Dear Experts,
Please advice how collective orders are settled.
I have tested and fouind that both child and header orders are to be settled individually but is there any possibility that if Header order is settled all the child orders are automatically settled.
Please explain the configuration steps to be folloewd to make auto settlement of child orders if parent order is settled.
Regards,
Krishna mohan

Dear Krishna mohan
their are 2 options to settle collective orders, see question 4 in FAQ note 1574381.
Normaly if you set indicator "Coll.order with Goods Movement" in customizing for order type the system should automatically generate the settlement rules for child orders settle to header order. Did you try this way?
BR Sabine

Order settlement - MTO

Hi Experts;
I am new to MTO environment. I have a issue with production order settlement.
1. Can u please guide me the steps which i need to follow and what is the difference between order settlement process comparing with MTS.
2. What is the role of pricing indicator "S" and "v" with order settlement.
3. Is there any relationship between moving / standard price of BOM components for the output material cost and moving price update of finished product.
Request you to explain the concept behind the settlement.
Thanks and Regards;
Malka samarasinghe

HI,
pls. check the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/90/ba81d2446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
It is a decision based on customer needs to follow "complex make-to-order production " or (the thing you require) "mass production on the basis of sales orders".
In the second case "The flow of quantities and values corresponds to that of make-to-stock production, while the cost accounting method costs the products."
There are a number of customizing steps to be made but it is possible to settle prod. order in MTO process not to sales order position but as it is in makt-to-stock process.
Best regards, Christian

KO8G open work order settlement

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Ashok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep

PM order settlement steps

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for