PM order settlement to Internal order

Hi,
I have a requirement to create work order without any refrence objects.During Teco ,System asks for the settlement rule.
Can PM Work Order be settled to internal orders?
Regards
Anil Kumar
Edited by: Anil Kumar on May 11, 2010 8:18 AM

You will not be able to have the same number as the internal order as they are stored in the same table (AUFK)
PM/CS order are category 30 and internal orders are category 01 (AUFK-AUTYP)
PeteA

Similar Messages

  • Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

    hi.
    I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
    let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
    for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
    the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011).  I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
    The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
    Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
    thank you,
    viktor

    Creation of Internal Order- KO01
    Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
    Settle the Internal Order- KO88
    Now the values have come to AUC asset
    Distribution of AUC- AIAB
    Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
    Settlement of AUC- AIBU

  • Settlement of Internal order to Asset under construction (AUC)

    Hi,
    To All
    While settling an internal order to AUC through KO88 it shows already settled whereas the balance of the internal remains the same and while settling AUC the error shows "there is no line item".
    What can be the problem, why internal order is not settling to AUC?
    Has anybody face this issue before? I have spent hell of the time on this issue but haven't resolved this. I would greatly appreciate your response on this.
    Thanks
    Jainendra

    Hi Jainendra,
    Please refer OSS Notes# 310116 (Settlement AuC: Open items not correctly cleared )
    OSS Notes# 412869   (AuC settlement: AW521 or line item not settled )
    Have a look into the below link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4f/71daf9448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
    Also refer the below SDN link:
    Re: Capitalization of Asset
    Hope this helps.
    Please assign points as a way to say thanks
    Message was edited by: Ravi Rana

  • Line Item settlement of Internal Order through Investment Measure

    Dear friends
    Can we do the line item settlement of Internal order. The Internal order is created through IO as Investment Measure.
    Thank You

    Hi,
    Yes. It is possible to have line item settlement for Investment Internal Order.
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers!

  • Error in Settlement: "Reversal of settlements on Internal Order's"

    Hi All,
    Please help me with the below issue which is as follows:
    "In October I did two settlements in error on internal
    Orders A & B. This refers to assets X &
    Y in co code XX".
    "I need to reverse these settlements in November, I assume
    I use KO88, but am concerned amount the FI posting".
    I want to know what sort of analysis is to be done and precuation to be taken before reversing the settlements.  Please help me this..
    Thanks a ton in advance.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    hi swatha.
      for settlement of internal orders/PM orders KO88/KO8G is run but before execution you shoud see the following step as period end activity:
      1.. calculate activity price (KSII)
      2. Revaluation of actual price KON1/KON2
      kkumar

  • Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

    Hi experts,
    We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
    Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
    Thank you,
    Michal

    Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
    That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
    In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • Set up a framework order on an Internal Order

    Hi Experts!
    Is it possible to set up a framework order on an Internal Order?
    Thanks for your help,
    Regards,
    Catherine

    Hi Catherine,
    In ME21N if you are selecting the document type as a Frame work order, you can select the account assignment category as F and then in account assignment tab you can enter the INTERNAL ORDER.
    As per the standard functionality if you will choose the account assignment category A (Asset) it will always grey out the order field as in this case Asset is the mandatory field.
    If you want to raise a framework order with account assignment category "A and also you want to enter the internal order, you have to change the field status in SPRO.
    I hope it will help.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • How to Transfer Cost From an Internal Order to Another Internal Order

    Dear Sir,
    We had one Internal Order opened for Asset Under Commission (AUC) . We also had opened another Internal Order and cost were booked in this Internal Order also .
    Now , we want to transfer the complete cost from 2nd Internal Order to 1st Internal Order . During the Transfer , we want to maintain the same GLs (i.e in 2nd Order the GLs get credited and in 1st Order the same GLs must be Debited)
    Pl guide us , how to transfer the cost .
    Regards
    B Mittal

    You can do a regular FI posting debiting and crediting the same account, with a different internal order in each line item.

  • Error while settlement of Internal order

    Dear All
    I am getting the following error while executing KO88 "Choose transaction type and base value appropriate for asset values".
    The settlement and posting period are 12 and the processing type is "Partial Capitalization".
    Pls advice
    Rgds
    Nitika

    hi.....
    check you settlemnt rule for internal order. forsure you will find mismatch between settlemnt rule and actual settlemnt. check in settlement rule the % to be settled.
    Regards
    Manish Jain
    Pls assign points if your problem get solved.

  • Settlement from internal order to asset under construction

    HI All,
    I have allocated some labors hours cost from production cost centers to real order which is created for allocating the internal cost to asset under construction.
    when i allocate the labor hours by using the "KB21N" it has used the secondary cost element that is "Internal activity allocation" cost element "1200002".
    i have given the source cost element "1200002" which is created as "internal activity allocation" and in settlement cost elements folder i have given receiving category is "FXA" and selected by cost element check box. i selected required entry field in settlement profile and assigned in order type.
    when i do the settlement to asset under construction from internal order it is showing bellow errow.
    "Settlement by cost element not possible due to secondary cost element
    Message no. KD553
    Diagnosis
    You want to settle the secondary cost element 1200002 by cost element to an asset or G/L account, which is not allowed.
    Procedure
    Extend your allocation structure R3, so that secondary cost elements are not settled by cost element, but with a settlement cost element."
    please let me know the problem and where i did mistake. give me the solution
    thanks in advance
    Mr.Rao

    HI,
    in your allocation structure R3 you entered in the view "Settlement cost element" that settlement receiver categoy FXA receives values "by cost element". This is only possible for primary cost elements. For internal activities do not tick "by cost element" but use a settlement cost element with cost element category "22".
    best regards, Christian

  • Settlements of internal orders: which table?

    Hi All,
    could anyone tell me in which table, the items of settlement (t.code KO88) for internal orders are stored?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    the settlement result (CO document line items) as already explained in table COEP, the settlement rule / distribution rules in tables COBRA / COBRB.
    best regards, Christian

  • Settlement rule - Internal orders

    Hi all
    Where do I define an automatic settlement rule for settlement of an internal order to a GL account?  I do not find any strategy sequences that would settle to a GL account....
    I know that I can use those strategy sequences for cost centers, WBS elements, etc. 
    Is there anything that I need to configure different?
    Please help...
    Thanks

    Hi Raghu
    Thanks for your quick reply.  I am talking about the automatic settlement rule.  I know how to create the settlement profile & define it manually when I create orders & make sure it gets settled to the GL account.
    But my client wants to default that settlement rule whenever they create orders.  For that I need to define an automatic settlement rule which will default itself to any order that i create with my order type. 
    It is under SPRO -> Controlling ->Internal Orders ->Actual Postings->Settlement -> Automatic generation of settlement rules -> Startegy sequences.  So there I dont find any GL account settlement strategy sequence.  So I was asking if anybody have set that up before for an auto settlement rule.
    Thanks

  • Can't settle an internal order by amount

    My company wants to settle internal orders to a fixed asset by amount instead of equivalence number or %.
    Can anyone describe in detail how to do this please. 
    Thanks and regards
    Walter

    HI,
    as mentioned above, if the "amount settlement" indicator is set in the settlement profile that is assigned to your CO-order you can go to KOB5, select the order/line items you want to settle tick "final settlement" and maintain the settlement rule by entering "amounts" to be settled not only "percentage" or " equivalence numbers".
    best regards, Christian

  • Reverse Asset AUC settlement with Internal order

    Hi Experts,
    User wrongly assigned Asset Internal Order to Expense GL Code, therefore we would like to reverse all the AUC settlement pertaining to that Internal Order. When we execute KO88, reversal its appearing one of the settlement.
    Please advise what are steps required to do complete reverse for all settlement with pertaining to that Internal Order and Asset.
    Thanks
    Srinu

    Hi:
        Can you please check AIST for reversal..
        Regards

  • AuC settlement with internal order

    friends,
    while settling AUC with interanal order in settlement rule i have given 100%, but after executing the settlement it is splitting the amount in three gl accounts, i created this internal order with type 0600 and object class - investment.
    regards,

    Hi,
    In the Allocation Structure you might have maintained these cost elements against the receiver.
    Thanks,
    Giridhar

Maybe you are looking for