PM Order Settlement

Hi,
I am using Plant Maintenance orders to post the maintenance cost and as a settlement rule i have include the internal order. but the issue is these orders are statistical and i want to carry out the settlement run in order to post these cost to the internal order. is there any possibility to post the cost directly to the internal order which the PM order is attached (Settlement Rule) instead of manually run the settlement.
Thanks
Gayani

Hi,
PM order is itself internal order in CO concept; so you cannot post a document to two orders.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Sales Order Settlement to Only WBS

Hi,
I have scenario like Sales Order Settlement to only WBS in make to order.
Again from WBS settlement to COPA.
So far I know WBS settlement to COPA and I am not sure in the 1 st scenario.
Can you any body tell me where I need to configure, is it only settlement profile or any other settings required?
Thanks & Regards,
KBR

Hi,
What is the business rational to have a 2 step settlement to COPA?
Thank you and Regards,
Varshal Kachole

KO8G open work order settlement

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Ashok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep

Using a different Sender GL in Internal Order Settlement

When we settle an Internal Order from GL/Cost Element 1 to Fixed Assets, we get:
Dr: Fixed Asset
Cr: GL/Cost Element 1.
For various reasons, we do not want to Credit the original GL/Cost Element but rather another one.
Does anyone have any sugestions as to how this can be achieved?
Thanks.

Hi
Can you tell me what is meant by "Internal Order from GL/Cost Element.."?
As per the functionality, when you settle an internal order, something is moved from the intrnal order and put to another. Hence the place from where it is moved is credited and the receiver is debited. The internal order has postings through the cost element you have posted. So the movement is from what the internal order has in its account.
Order settlement is done through a secondary cost element created and this cost element is used for debiting and crediting the sender and receivers. Hence your idea of using a totally different GL/Cost element (of course that do not have postings with respect fo the internal order in question) is not practical, I hope.

For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

Hi Gurus,
For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
Please help in this regard
Thank you.
Ranganadh

Hi
Check the path
IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Error while doing production order settlement

Hi frds,
When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
" There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
Rajnish

Rajnish,
Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
Regards,
Prasobh

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

Hi Experts,
I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
CO43 - Collective Processing
2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
KKAO - Collective Processing
3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
KKS1 - Collective Processing
4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
CO88 - Collective Processing
I am not able to do these steps.
KGI2: the screen is appearing without any details,but there is no error message.
KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Dear,
Message no KD256??
You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
Check this OSS note 179533
Also check order previously settled?
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

Dear Experts,
Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
5. We are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost. Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA (at the time of Billing)
Regards,
vgl
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

Hi
1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
regards
Ajay M

PM Order settlements - Difference between the amounts settled

Hi All,
This is regarding the PM Order settlements.
Every month end finance team run KO8G and settle the PM Order costs for that period (month). In the process the Orders are settled using a variant, which captures all the orders that has changed/created during the focused period.
But in the report S_ALR_87013015 - List: Actual Debit/Credit there are balances for previous settlements and thereu2019s a difference between the amount settled and the debit/credit amounts.
When drilling gown we found that this is due to following reasons,
1. Some orders are not settled fully.
2. Equipments issued against a Order are returned after the settlement process
Ex: one Order has settled in Oct 2008 initially and fully in Jan 2009. However one material has been returned to stores in February 2009. Therefore a difference (cost of the material) between total actual cost (Dr Amount) and settled amount has been arisen.
The Orders of nature 1 will be captured and settled in the subsequent run of KO8G.
But my question is how can we address the orders of nature 2? Changing the settlement variant is one option.
Also appreciate if someone can explain the SAP-best practice of PM-Order settlements.
Thanks,
Thushantha.

Hi Thushantha,
After returning the material to store check the actual cost of maintenance order. Once you fully settle the order means it becomes zero.
When you will return material to warehouse against maintenance order once again carry out settlement of maintenanc order then check for your nature 2.
Sundar

Assiging wbs element as settlment receiver in service order settlement

Hi PM CS Experts.
We are using scenarios of creation of service order from sales order. So whatever cost we incurred for service order settling to sales order via settlement rule - settlment receiver is Sales order i.e. SDI. We are using settlement profie XX which have default object type for settling SDI. While releasing the service order the settlement rule created with settlement receiver is SDI.
Now for different business scenarios, we are settling service order cost to WBS. Now we want to create a settlemetn rule for WBS, settlement receiver will be WBS element, while saving the service order. What configuration, master data or processes we have to follow for this.
please reply on this.
regards
abhay

Sales Order line item have account assignment WBS element. From this sales order line, a service order will be created. So our idea is whatever cost booked to service order should be settled to wbs element instead of sales order.
also in location tab of service order, the wbs element from sales order is not inherrited in account assignment section. Why this we are not knowing. Have you have any idea for this.
regards
abhay

Process order settlement

Hi,
when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
Sunoj

error message when executing KKS2
KV 206 1 OIT 20000095/1 No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001 Checking and processing orders

Cut off period for sales order settlement

Dear Expert,
Client using SAP from last 13 years. Client implemented MTO with valuated stock and activated the COPA.
Now we are re implementing the COPA. since go live(from last 13 years ) they are not doing any sales order settlements and not using COPA.
In sales order RA key(Requirement class) is assigned and Settlement type is 'FUL'.
Now client has decided to use COPA and going to live with new structure on September 1 2014.
I have do the below changes
1. Removed RA key(Not required as per business requirement)
2. Changed settlement type from 'FUL' to PER., here i am having some questions. Client don't want to settle previous orders(before September). as per business requirement they will use one sales order for long time (3 to 4 months). after going live client will settle the sales orders at that time system will consider all sales orders. How can i avoid selection of all sales orders. i want to settle only sales orders having transactions during one month (September)
To avoid this problem now its self i am moving this changes to Production client (RA key removed and Settlement type change), still i am not confident i will get as expected, because at the time of Sales order settlement system will consider all old sales orders.
Can anyone please suggest beat way to handle this issue...
Thanks.
Chandrasekhar

Hi Chandra,
Check the Below SAP Note
174815
- Selection parameter in VA88 or RKO7VA88
Symptom
During the settlement of sales and distribution documents with Transaction
VA88 or report RKO7VA88, you can only select according to the SD document number
or the sales organization.
For example, you cannot select by plant or SD
document type.
Other Terms
VA88
Reason and Prerequisites
The problem occurs due to a previous program design.
Solution
With the attached advance correction, you can also select according to the
plant or the SD document type in report RKO7VA88.The previous restrictions apply
for Transaction VA88.
To correct the error in advance, proceed as
follows:
1. First implement Notes 174502 and 182735.
2. Using Transaction SE11, add field VBAUART (data element AUART) to
structures LKO74 and RKASS. Activate the structures.
3. Add the following parameter to the interface of function module
SD_DOCUMENT_OBJNR_GET (Transaction SE37):
a) Import parameter:I_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and I_AUART
(reference field VBAK-AUART). Both parameters should be indicated as
'optional'.
b) Export parameter:E_WERKS (reference field VBAP-WERKS) and E_AUART
(reference field VBAK-AUART).
4. Implement the source code corrections.
5. Maintain the text elements for report RKO7VA88 (Transaction SE38, Goto
--> Text elements --> Selection texts):Text 'Sales document type' for
VBAUART and 'Plant' for WERKS.
Afterwards, also implement Note 210011.
Regards
Srinu

How to open field WERKS in Internal order settlement rule

Hello experts,
Could you explain please how to add field PLANT (WERKS) in internal order settlement rules. I would like to fill out this field during the settlement process.
Any advices will be very appreciated.
Regards,
Ivan

HI Ivan,
Please post more details on your business scenario. Why you want to add plant field in the rule?
To which receiver you want settle your internal order? If you want to settle to a material for instance, plant will be one of the field available. Try double click on settlement rule to get to detailed screen.

Internal order settlement to G/L account

Dear All,
User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Rao.

It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works. If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order. To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number. In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this. Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required. Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L. Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order. The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure. The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule. Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element. if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
thanks,

PM Order Settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for