PMS ratings should come in decimals

Hi Experts,
We are implementing the PMS module.
I am facing problem in getting the ratings in decimals.
There is a formula Whitage*Rating.The resultant has to come in decimals.At present the rating is showing as rounded figure.
How to get the rating in decimals without rounded numbers.
Please advice.
Regards,
Sairam.

Hi Sairam,
Which Value list and class have you assigned to the ratings column? Pl try to assign the Value list as "Numeric scale without texts" and Value class as " Numeric Value" to the ratings column.
In my appraisal template, I am able to get ratings in decimal format with the above settings. I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Sachin

Similar Messages

Re: Whence should come the frameworks?

At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Thomas,
I think you have brought up a really good question and one that deserves
some attention by all:
customers, partners and Forte. The advent of third-party tools for the
Forte marketplace is an interesting prospect. If I take my companies
product (SCAFFOLDS), the original impetus for building such a thing, was not
to offer an alternative to Forte Express, but to offer an alternative to
building applications with raw Forte. And as such, we have not targeted,
feature compared or analyzed Forte Express to help build or sell any part of
our product.
I think the reason for this is that many of us in the framework business do
not see ourselves as having a competing product to Forte Express. The
reason for this is that we have taken on applications with our products that
Forte themselves would not pitch Express at. The architectural descriptions
in SCAFFOLDS have been used to do everything from simple to very complex GUI
development to Database persistence or communications to satellites.
Because of this, there is some overlap of functionality, but certainly we
see Forte Express being used for a much more limited class of application.
I would question the assertion that it is good for Forte to build more. I
think Forte, like any company, has a limited amount of engineering muscle.
With this muscle they should be concentrating on their core products that
make the company profitable. If I look at their product line-up, clearly
the Forte Development Tool is the make or break product. They should rely
more on the marketplace to provide solutions for things that are outside of
their core products. I sort of take the opposite tact. It seems clear that
the more a third party marketplace finds outlets for their solutions the
more diverse solutions we are likely find in that marketplace. As an
example, if you look at the Visual Basic marketplace, clearly it is big with
many, many solutions because Microsoft defined some specs for add in
components and let the marketplace provide solutions.
I think Forte could spend more time opening up their tool for additions by
third-party vendors. For example, things like object introspection, an open
repository and dynamically adding widget types would do wonders for the
number and kinds of solutions that would exist in the Forte marketplace
today if this was done a version or two ago. Instead, I think Forte spent
much of their engineering muscle on other kinds of products, like Forte
Express. Whether this strategy will pay of for them remains to be seen, but
certainly if they enter the Java world, they will have to change their
current strategy with regard to support to third-party solutions. The Java
marketplace is very diverse today and Forte will have to allow more
third-party integration to be taken seriously in that market.
Mark Perreira
Sage IT Partners.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Thomas Mercer-Hursh,
Ph.D.
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 1998 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in
the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position
of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their
customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which
would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen
if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the
companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

INR should come on the top , not in every row...

Dear Experts,
I am facing an onother issue. The issue seems very simple but a m nt able to solve it.
In service report ,
                  Net Income
                  540,000.00 INR
                 243,000.00 INR
But in Sales Report,
                     Net Sales
                           INR
                    3,718,710.31
                  16,057,490.72
In above service report the data should come like the Sales Report. I am able to change it only for my system, but i am not able to do it Globally.
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
In such a way I am getting the value like ,
                 Net Income
                        INR
                540,000.00
                243,000.00
But the problem is , its not applicable for the global users.
Please put some light .
Thanks,
Sanjana

Hi Chandu,
If I change in the following way :
In the report , Net Income --> Right click --> properties --> Display --> Display scaling factors for key figures..
For that time I am able to see the report like
Net Income
INR
540,000.00
243,000.00
But If I start after putting transaction RRMX , then its showing like ,
Net Income
540,000.00 INR
243,000.00 INR
This means its not getting stored . What should I do ?
Please put some light .
Thanks,
Sanjana

In Table Maintaince G/L Text should come by default with G/L Acc.--Ple

Hi Guruu2019s
I created Ztable with 3 fields G/L Acc, G/L Acc text and another Zfield.
I created a TABLE MAINTAINCE for this. Here we need, after entering the G/L A/C in table maintaince-- G/L Text should come by default. Please suggest a way do these.

Hi,
You need to write the code in the EVENTS. these are avilable in the table maintanence. you can use event 05(create), here give the Perform name and click on the code button there you can write the logic to bring the short text and move that text to your Ztable field.
look at the link to create the events --> /people/sudheer.junnuthula2/blog/2007/07/31/events-in-table-maintenance-generator
Thanks
Sudheer

Payment Terms should come from vendor master data

When we create a new contract (ME31K) Z0NQ for the vendor XYZ by default the payment terms that the contract retrieve is 1131, but in master data (XK03) for vendor XYZ I have payment terms 1011 defined.
I already checked it in Purchase organization and CCode level.
Please advise. Thanks!

It should come from vendor master only butmake sure that you are creating cintract based onthe RFQ or some use exit is avtive for that.

Vendor debit balance should come in sundry debtor balance

Hi, Gurus
My problem is that my client wants that if a vendor has debit balance than it should be treated as sundry debtor (Current Asset) and balance should come in sundry debtor reco. GL, similarly if a Customer has credit balance than it should be treated as sundry creditor (Current liability) and it should come in to sundry creditor balance.SAP provides overall debit/credit balance of Reco. Gl, my requirement is per vendor/customer wise i,e if Mr. X is a vendor and he has credit balance of say Rs.1000/- than its ok but another vendor say Mr. Y has debit balance of Rs. 7000/- than it should come in sundry debtor GL, what SAP is doing it will show debit balance in sundry creditor Reco. GL.
Please help me and provide appropriate solution.
Thanks & Regards
Anuraj

Hi ,
you need to perform closing operations for Accounts Recievable /Payable to achieve your client requirement.
Please read below SAP help.
Customers in Credit and Vendors in Debit
A credit balance on a customer account should be displayed as a payable; conversely, a debit balance on a vendor account should be displayed as a receivable. If such a situation arises, the program makes the appropriate adjustment postings automatically.
To do this, the system determines the total for each account and reconciliation account. This guarantees that special G/L transactions, for example down payments and bills of exchange are displayed separately from the payables and receivables. Accounts with the same consolidation company ID are considered together.
The receivables account in the figure above identifies a credit balance of $2000 for Customer 3. This payable is to be displayed in the balance sheet under the item "Other payables". You therefore transfer the amount to the account of that name. The receivables account is adjusted by a posting to the adjustment account.
Prerequisites
Since you cannot post to the reconciliation accounts directly, the system makes adjustment postings for you. You should display the reconciliation account and the adjustment account under the same balance sheet item. The system posts the offsetting entry to a G/L account, under which the payable (or receivable) is now displayed in the balance sheet. You must have defined the account numbers for the adjustment accounts and the accounts for the offsetting entries in the system already. The posting keys are already defined in the standard system.
To define the account numbers, select the activity Define adjustment acts for reclassifying payabl./receivables in the Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Implementation Guide.
Regards,
Lakshmu

Updated record should come in txt file

Hi Friends,
My requirements like this way, any changes make in mara, mard, mbew, makt, vbak, vbap, vbrk and abrp table. that newly created data should come in .txt file of application server.
I have already developed a program for that. it is downloading data in every 3 hours slots. it is running in background. whatever changes made during these hours it will download.
now, my requirement has been changed, instance data should come in .txt file of app server. e.g. when newly created record save in database table, same time that record should come in .txt file with proper format.
is it possible? please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Parag

Hi Parag,
To obtain changes you know you can get the details from the tables CDHDR and CDPOS.
Also you have questions about performance and so. SO here are some details.
- When you flag a data element for change document (is checked) it is ONLY a marker that allows for registration of this field's changes into CDHDR and CDPOS. The actual control is done on datafile level in its technical settings (Transaction SE11 with datafile name and then push button "Technical Settings" or CtrlShiftF9). Herein you will find a flag "Log data changes".
Within the CDHDR file and CDPOS file a field OBJECTCLAS is used. Only for existing OBJECTCLAS values the changes are logged.
- Now obvious this is the trick for standard SAP (as Subramanian has already pointed out you can find "OBJECTCLAS" values with transaction SCDO). If you want to know on how to create your own "OBJECTCLAS" values with working logging on your own designed fields follow Subramanian suggestion and read the documentation.
Now to your questions:
You gave some tables you need to track changes (and now also for initial creation) like MARA, MARD, MAKT and others.
To get changes for these tables use the following "OBJECTCLAS" values:
- MATERIAL (Tables MARA, MARC, MARD, MBEW, MFHM, MLGN, MLGT, MPGD, MPOP and MVKE). By-the-way, this object will be replaced by MATERIAL_N (available from release 4.6x).
- VERKBELEG (Tables VBAK, VBAP, VBEP, VBKD, VBLB, VBPA, VBPA2 and VBUK).
To collect changes (suggested by Andreas) you could use function module CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ. This is very usefull if also archiving is active for the objects you need to track changes for and your changes are scattered through time, but for your problem it is better to approach the log data directly.
1. First select the main change documents from CDHDR table for a given "OBJECTCLAS" and "OBJECTID". Here you can use additional filtering on DATE (field UDATE) and TIME (field (UTIME). Even filtering on a specific transaction is possible (field TCODE).
This gives you a number of change documents (field CHANGENR).
2a. Secondly select the specific field changes from table CDPOS by using the found fields from CDHDR and additionally fill TABNAME with the specific table and if required FNAME with the specific field name. 2b. Since in your case the values will not be known, you need to track changes, you have to be very carefull in your selections. If you track the object MATERIAL or MATERIAL_N, you best loop over the MARA table and for each MATNR fill the OBJECTID field of CDHDR with this MATNR value.
3. In order to find NEWLY created items you need to check the CHANGE_IND flag. When 'I' it is an new insert, when 'U' it is an update. Now this rule applies ONLY to key fields, since SAP first creates the key record (CHANGE_IND = 'I') and then the other fields (CHANGE_IND = 'U').
Finally the warning given by Andreas (runtime increases - you MUST select with OBJECTCLAS and OBJECTID) is very important. Not supplying OBJECTID will have a very heavy impact on the runtime.
Hope this gives you some clues on how to approach your problem.
Regards,
Rob.

Recorded a video in portrait mode and want to switch it to landscape mode is there any way else to do it without useing quicktime pro....hope apple fixes this in ios 7 the video should come out in landscape regardless of the way you hold your phone

is there any way else to do it without useing quicktime pro....hope apple fixes this in ios 7 the video should come out in landscape regardless of the way you hold your phone or if you start in portrait and go into landscape while recording

You used the data. Verizon can not see what it was sued for. However your phone can see whats apps used the data. go to settings-data usage- there will be a place that says data usage cycle. line the dates up with your cycle. then there will be a bar graph below that extend bother white bars one all the way to the left and one all the way to the right. after those are extended below that will be a list of apps, there should be one that used over 2 gb and that will show you what app used that data in her purse

Purchase Org, Company code bydefault should come

Hi Friends,
Here the client wants the company code and purchasing Organisation should be bydefault at the time of PO/PR creation stage. Here we have 4 company codes and 4 purchasing organisations available in the server. For a specific company code, the users demand that for them their Company code and Purchasing Organization should come as bydefault when they create PO or PR.
Please advice how to do the settings so that the users should not select these 2 fields at the time of PO/PR creation.
Thanks & Regards
Satya

Hello Satyabrata,
In ME21n/ME51n goto Personal settings tab in that choose Default Values where we can enter CoCode, Purch.Org, & Purch group & save it.
So whenever PO or PR is created the default values will be what we entered in the personal settings.
I think this will be helpful if so pls reward.
Rgds,
Bala.

Forwarding Agent should come automatically in Sales order

Hi Experts,
My user's requirement is Forwarding agent should come automatically in Sales order at partners tab.
Can you please suggest what configuration do ineed to do,
To get this Forwarding agent automatically in sales order level.
Regards,
Sunina

Hi Sunaina,
create a vendor with XK01 with the required Forwardng Agent. At the time of creating customer master record assing this FA. Now at the time of sales order creation this FA is defaulted automatically.
Incase you have multiple FA's then also you assign all of them to customer master partner tab with partner function FA.
During sales it will give you a pop up to select the required FA.
Make sure that partner function FA (or incase if you have created a new also) this is assigned to the account group of customer master you are using.
I hope this answers your query.
regards
sadhu kishore

Quantity should come automatically in MI04

Hi,
We want that in transaction MI04, Quantity should come automatically.
Suppose there are 10 line items in MI04. In 1st 8 line items, we insert the Quantity manually but not in last 2.
We want that in last 2 line items, Quantity must pick automatically from system. Please let me know, how it come automatically or pick from system.
Is it possible or not???
Regards.

Is it possible through User Exit or Enhancement point.
Please explain, where i can change the structure according my issue...
Please help..
Edited by: @ABAP@ on Oct 6, 2009 1:22 PM

Quantity should come automatically in MI04 line items

Hi,
Suppose there are 10 line items in MI04. In 1st five line items against material, we insert the Quantity but not for last 5.
We want that in last 5 line items, Quantity must pick automatically from system. Means in last 5, Perpetual Inventory quantity should come automatically.
please let me know, how it come automatically or pick from system.
Regards..
Edited by: @ABAP@ on Oct 5, 2009 6:03 PM

certainly not.
Get user and auditors together. this may already make this request obsolete.
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Oct 5, 2009 3:10 PM

TANN item quantity should come in grey mode in sales order

Hi,
Requirement is in a sales order for TANN item category the quantity should come in non editable (GREY) mode.For this as per my search in Google and forums i got the suggestion to use the "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ".But my technical (ABAP) is required more clarity about doing this. Can anybody suggest me in detail how to give logic for him?
For few cases For one sales organisation and for few distribution channels only this quantity should come in grey mode.
Suggest me how to achieve this.

hi
in the user exit perform lyk this
loop at screen
if screen name = 'tann'
if field contains value .
screen-input = '0'
modify scrren.
endif.
endif.
endloop.
thanks
chaitanya.

Confirmed quantity should come equal to order quantity

Hi Friends,
I have created one sales order and when I am going thruGo to>item data-->schedule lines then confirmed quantity is showing zero(0).
I want that confirmed quantity should come equal to order quantity.
Regards

Hi friends,
When I am trying with mov. type 561 or other and entering the material ,quantity,st. location and saving then getting the below error.
Any pointers.
G/L account 11500888 blocked for posting in company code 730
Message no. M7 161
Diagnosis
No postings can be made to a G/L account that is blocked.
Procedure
Determine whether another G/L account is suitable for the transaction.
Inform the individual or section responsible for G/L accounts in the relevant company code.
2.Also if I am trying with other matrl( having sufficient unrestricted stock available) then for that also quantities are not matching. why like this ?
Regards
Edited by: Amit Kumar on Nov 7, 2008 5:07 AM

Reg.condition types should come automatically during CR and Billing creatio

Dear Friends
I create new condition types for MRP price and other taxes which is working fine but I have to be entered each time when I create CR and Billing, I want those conditions which is mentioned in the procedure-.control data should come automatically during the the CR and Billing. Please advice me. Previously I got a reply that should create condition record for each condition in VK11,HOW it is possible ?
I didnot assign any access sequence to my conditions which is newly created, so that the above problem could be arrived?
Thanks in advance
Rajakumar.K

Hi,
If there is access sequence then it is possible to bring condition in sales document automatically.
for this Just create on dummy access sequence and assign to condition type
Generate table with combination of only sales organization by V/03
Create access sequence by V/07 and assign this table
Assign this access sequence to condition type
in V/06 under change can be made tab for Manual entries put blank (No limitations)
Maintain condition record for condition type (with price or without price)
Then condition will come automatically
kapil

PMS ratings should come in decimals

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for