PO and GR value differs

Hi Seniors,
PR XXXXXX contains the following data - 900 EA, net price - 436.67 RUB/ 1 EA, total valuation for the item = 393003 RUB. Item of PO XXXXXX created with the reference to this PR item. It contains the following data - 90 CS (10 EA in 1 CS), net price 4366.70 RUB/ 1 CS, total valuation for the item = 393003 RUB. In fact, both amounts (PR and PO) are the same. But Goods Receipt for this item in PO has been posted with the following data - quantity = 90 CS, amount - 39300.30 RUB. The amount is 10 times less than the original value. It seems that incorrect calcuation takes place in the system. What could be the reason. In mat.master..in additional date 1 cs = 1 ea has been maintained and order unit also maintained correctly. But accounting view is not maintained. Info record is also not there.
what could be the reason. Kindly clear me plz.
Regards,
JanaMM
Edited by: JanaMM on May 31, 2010 3:46 PM

yes MR21 will change the price, which effects the valuation of all stocks of this material.
it creates a price change document that updates the G/L stock account in FI.
dont fear this price change, you change the price to a correct price. All your previous goods issues where valuated with a wrong price (which may be much more dramatic, and you may need to consider a MR21 price adjustment for all materials that got manufactured from this component )
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jun 9, 2010 8:59 PM

Similar Messages

Condition Values different fro Billing and Excise Invoice in some cases

Hi All,
Excise Invoice for domestic sales is having different condition values.
I am scenerio like this when Billing doc manually VF01, excise Invoice in generated automatically and condition values
were corrrect.But when I create Billing Document using BAPI in program, Excise Invoice is not generating,then
we are running BDC for T-code J1IIN and creating Excise Invoice.Excise Invoice generated in second case (by BDC)
is having wrong condition values.
Can anyone explain why it is happing.Is there any user exist to copy Billing Doc condition values to Excise Invoice?
Thanks in Advance ,
Rayudu

Thanks for you response Lakshimipathy.
The above mentioned configurations were all ready done.Excise Invoice is getting generated when we create Billing Doc online.
Problem here is Excise invoice is not getting generated automatically when Billing Doc is created by our program,so we were running BDC code to created excise Invoice.
Condition values ( Duties :AED,Ecess,SHEcess) were getting calculated wrongly in excise Invoice which is created by running BDC code in program. But the Excise invoice which was created automatically while saving Billing doc manually is having correct condition values. But the billing document condition values remain the same & correct for both.
Regards,
Rayudu

Acrobat 6 and 8 see different values in fields

I have a client that has been using Acrobat 6 to generate PDFs and fill in the fields. She has a standard PDF she makes for each client that is then copied and the values changed for each job. She's in the process of upgrading to 8, but ran in to a problem that I'm at a loss to explain. The forms generated in 6 that are opened by 8 don't show the correct values. The data relects the original form. For example, she had one dated 3/12/11 with maybe 100 different fields. She copied it, replaced the data in every field (such as making the date 4/1/12) and saved it. When 8 opens it, it sees the original values throughout. When I opened it with Reader, it showed the new values correctly.
What gives?

Two days and nothing? Nice to see Adobe doesn't care that their product has a serious flaw. I think I'll just suggest they return Acrobat and try PhantomPDF by Foxit. They at least respond to issues. Cheaper too.

NEF to DNG 6.5 results in different number of unique colors, pixels and RGB values

I took pictures from my old Nikon D40. I converted them with the standard settings from NEF to DNG.
I then used UFRAW under Linux and saw that the pixel size increased from 3039x2040 in NEF to 3040x2040 in the DNG - and that the live view RGB values were about 5% higher for NEF that for DNG.
"FastStone Image Viewer" shows the same increase in pixel size. Additionally, it shows that the DNG has roughly 93,000 unique colors compare to 90,000 for the NEF file.
More pixel, different RGB values, different counted unique colors - what's going on here? This doesn't look like a 1:1 conversion?

Not exactly sure what you're comparing. For raw data you need to be comparing the original mosaic data values (not some converted result, or even partially converted result like demosaiced result). Are you sure that's what you're doing?

Ok, im new to numbers but i cant work this one out. In column A is an average of hours worked. I have 4 columns. A and B have different values. Column C is an average of hours worked. When column C is less then 8 i need column D to equal column a

Ok, im new to numbers but i cant work this one out. I have 4 columns. A and B have different values. Column C is an average of hours worked. When column C is less then 8 i need column D to equal column A. When column C is equal or greater then 8 i need column D to equal the sum of A and B.

Hi Lucas,
Try this:
Formula in D2 (and Fill Down) =IF(C2<8, A2,A2+B2)
The IF function follows the logic of if, then, else.
IF(this is true, then do this, else do that)
If it is raining, then stay at home, else hold a picnic .
Regards,
Ian.

Parameter value in RZ11 and table TPFET differs

Hello!
In order to check the value of several parameters in a SAP system we have in place a procedure that analyze that value against the table TPFET. In general it works pretty well (as far as you also consider the values defined in the kernel of SAP whenever there is not information in TPFET) but we have found one or two cases where the data look wrong.
In particular, for 2 SAP systems we found that the value for an specific parameter was fill with some value in TPFET (login/multi_login_users but i guess the parameter is not relevant) but thru RZ11 the value looks empty (more precisely, the standard value, the profile value and the current value were empty). The only thing "strange" in TPFET for this value was that the column PSTATE shows "M" value.
So the questions are:
1) Do know why TPFET value differs from RZ11 one?
2) What does "M" means in TPFET-PSTATE?
Thanks in advanced,
Félix

Hi Felix,
1) Do know why TPFET value differs from RZ11 one?
       There is a two tables TPFYPROPTY   and TPFET.
        1. TPFYPROPTY - In this table all standard values ( profile parameter values) will come by default ( RZ11).
        2. TPFET - This table is related to you RZ10 profile parameter values
2) What does "M" means in TPFET-PSTATE?
                  M means Modified standard values in RZ10 profile parameters
find below link
Difference between maintaining parameter values... | SCN
Thanks
Siva

Good night, I ended up making a purchase at Apple, but my credit card operator called me to confirm the values and was told different values than bought. Purchases appeared as: $ 159.70 (protocol 604627) $ 137.00 (protocol 604538) $ 105.39 (protoco

good night,
I ended up making a purchase at Apple, but my credit card operator called me to confirm the values and was told different values than bought.
Purchases appeared as:
$ 159.70 (protocol 604627)
$ 137.00 (protocol 604538)
$ 105.39 (protocol 604468)
$ 0.01 (protocol 615633)
Could you check what is happening? Because I had to cancel my card for security.
Sincerely,

np33td33 wrote:
My purchases were:
macBookPro
office 2011
iwork
ilife
and these purchases did not appear in the system credit card
Call Apple at 1800MYAPPLE. We just deal with MacBook Pro issues, and we have nothing to do with Apple. Please read what others have posted.

Need to display different colors for Actuals and forecasting values in WAD

Hi Gurus,
My requirement in the report is, I need to display different colors for particular values like Actuals(say value type 10) and for forecasting values(say value type 20) , and data will uploaded from flat file.
Scenario : If I upload the data for March Month, I receive actual values upto March(Jan to March month) and from April to Dec(Forecast values with value type 20), Every month I will be getting file and similarly for subsequent months, i will get current month actual values and forwarding months forecasting values,
Now , my requirement is, When ever i execute the Report, Say if i execute for April Month, Upto April( Jan to April for actual values should be displayed in one color) and from May to Dec ( forecast values should be displayed in different color).
I had tried with following options like exceptions and could not display , as it runs based on key figure values where as my requiremnet is based on the CALMONTH , i need to show different colors for both actual and forecast values.
Kindly, help me out from this,
Thanks

Hi,
it is not necesseary that you need to do that in WAD , you can do the same in BEx platform, Since WAD is build above the bex reports. so automatially any changes done in Report will be replicated in WAD
Go for Exceptions in Bex. Give some range for Actuals and Forcasting at the creation of the exception.
if you do those changes in BEX automatically it will replicate in the WAD.
for more information please read this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/68/253239bd1fa74ee10000000a114084/content.htm
hope this will solve your problem.
Santosh

Navigate between 2 reports and pass values between 2 different columns

Hello
I have a question about navigating from 1 report to another while passing the value from column 1 to column 2 in the second report...
In OBIEE 11G, I create action link on report 1, column 1 and this action link is navigate to BI Content and the destination is report 2. Now report 2 has column 2, which is an alias of column 1 from report 1, from user's point of view they are the same, but from OBIEE point of view they are different.
My action link is able to navigate to report 2, however, the value in column 1 which I clicked to execute the navigation, does not get passed to column 2 in report 2..
Is there a way around this issue?
Let me know if I need to provide more clarification
Thanks

Thank you Anirban
I think this is the best solution you just provided.The current post and the post at below looks same
Navigate from report to dashboard and pass values between different column
is it not answered?
Thanks :)
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on May 7, 2013 3:07 PM

NULL and Space value in ABAP

Hi All,
I like to know, is it NULL and Space value is same in ABAP, if it is not how to check null value.
Thank you.
Senthil

everything is correct though some answers are not correct.
A Database NULL value represents a field that has never been stored to database - this saving space, potentially.
Usually all SAP tables are stored with all fields, empty fields are stored with their initial value.
But: If a new table append is created and the newly-added fields do not have the 'initial value' marked in table definition, Oracle will just set NULL values for them.
as mentioned: There is no NULL value to be stored in an ABAP field. The IS NULL comparison is valid only for WHERE clause in SELECT statement. WHERE field = space is different from WHERE field IS NULL. That's why you should check for both specially for appended table fields.
If a record is selected (fulfilling another WHERE condition) into an internal table or work area, NULL values are convertted to their initial values anyway.
Hope that sheds some light on the subject!
regards,
Clemens

Report for inward and outward value/rate

We had an audit query regarding Inventory valuation. The auditor was not convinced of the price movements. Following is the procedure adopted by me to convince the auditor. In the process I located an error in the system. Kindly let me know which t-code I should use to get the correct values.
We are a Trading company engaged in distribution of Raw Materials (Chemicals) Imported - 99% & 1% local purchase.
Ours is a Moving Average Inventory system in SAP (ECC6). We adopted this because all our materials are imported and most of them are of a different batch no. barring a few exceptions.
I firstly took out the PO history tab screen shot for the value of the inventory (as well as Rate/kg) to know the valuation at the time of GRN. Then I went to MM03 for the same material with the same batch/valuation type so that the rate/kg is confirmed therein, in the Accounting1 screen. Thirdly, the Warehouse stock of Material report (MB52) was run to know the current values. At all these places, I found that the valuation is perfectly matching with the PO history MIRO values, which gives the inventory purchase value.
But when I ran the Material document list, (MB51) report, wherein the inward & outward values of the said batch of material is reported, the inventory value charged to COGS is matching with all the above reports in the previous paragraph for the material issued on various dates. However, the inward date even though it matches with the PO history MIRO date, the value does not match. Is it a report issue or a configuration issue.
Else is there any other report which gives the exact inward and outward value/rate??

Hi,
Check your material movement report with Transaction Code:S_P00_07000139.
System working perfectly on accounting document posting where price control available in material master play vital role.
Cross check your material master may have moving average price (price control -V) where system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.The system automatically calculates the latter upon every goods movement by dividing the total value by the total stock quantity ( Total Value/Total quantity)
Regards,
Biju K

Take an existing text file and modify values

I’m looking to take an existing text file and modify certain values inside of it. Then save it to a new file, with all the same formatting as the original. The file format is not uniform and can change.
Basically the file is:
Random numbers and letters of unknown length for an unknown number of lines.
Label="Test_#"
Description
String
X=123
Y=456
Z=-789
20 lines of strings with numbers in them
Label="Test_#2"
Description
String
X=-1232
Y=4562
Z=7892
Then it repeats a set number of times.
I want to modify the X Y and Z = values for each Test_#.
I’ve managed to import the important values into a numeric array and I have a different array with values that will replace the existing ones. I’m having troubles replacing the existing ones. There are no zeros before or after the existing numbers so they are all different lengths.
If anyone has any sample code that does anything similar please post it. I’m sure someone has done something like this in the past.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I just thought I would throw this out there. Can you make the .txt file tokenized? This would make searching for specific parameters much easier.
Reese, (former CLAD, future CLD)
Some people call me the Space Cowboy!
Some call me the gangster of love.
Some people call me MoReese!
...I'm right here baby, right here, right here, right here at home

How to read .html file and store values into oracle table from html file

Hi all ,
How to read .html file and store values into oracle table from html file using pl/sql
Please Help.....

Hi,
Kindly find following sample html code ,i want to store every value in different column in database .
<html><body><p/>
<div style="position:absolute;top:47px;left:37px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:47px;left:680px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:94px;left:151px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:1pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1080px;left:115px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:8pt;white-space:nowrap;">4497743
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1079px;left:442px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:9pt;white-space:nowrap;"> Miclyn Express Offshore Pre-Quotation Disclosure
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1079px;left:680px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:9pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1079px;left:723px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:9pt;white-space:nowrap;">page 5
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1083px;left:151px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:1pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:107px;left:151px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>Attachment 2 ¿ indicative statement of 20 largest shareholders </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:139px;left:262px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>Name </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:131px;left:415px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>Number of Shares </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:147px;left:458px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>Held </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:131px;left:560px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>Percentage of </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:147px;left:567px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:10pt;white-space:nowrap;"><b>shares held </b>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:179px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Macquarie Capital Group Limited 92,378,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:179px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:179px;left:618px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">34.00%r
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:179px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:212px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia)
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:227px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Limited
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:220px;left:464px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">36,458,220
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:220px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:220px;left:618px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">13.42%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:220px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:260px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Ray Rider Limited 27,170,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:260px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:260px;left:618px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">10.00%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:260px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:300px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:300px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">7.96%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:300px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:333px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">National Australia Bank Custodian
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:348px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Services
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:341px;left:464px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">12,866,550
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:341px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:341px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">4.74%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:341px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:381px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Citigroup Nominees Pty Ltd 6,942,541
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:381px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:381px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">2.56%r
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:381px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:421px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:421px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">2.14%r
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:421px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:462px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">UBS Securities Australia Ltd 4,806,760
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:462px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:462px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">1.77%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:462px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:494px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia)
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:510px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Limited
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:502px;left:472px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">4,325,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:502px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:502px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">1.59%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:502px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:550px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Equities Ltd
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:542px;left:472px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">4,150,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:542px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:542px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">1.53%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:542px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:575px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Bond Street Custodians Limited - A/C
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:590px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Institutional
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:583px;left:472px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">2,750,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:583px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:583px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">1.01%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:583px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:623px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Cogent Investment Operations Pty Ltd 2,599,321
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:623px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:623px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.96%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:623px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:663px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Skeet Nominees Pty Ltd 2,276,736
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:663px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:663px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.84%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:663px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:704px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Diederik de Boer 1,917,561
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:704px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:704px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.71%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:704px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:744px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Ecapital Nominees Pty Limited 1,594,736
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:744px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:744px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.59%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:744px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:777px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Neweconomy Com Au Nominees Pty 9
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:792px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Limited <900 Account>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:784px;left:472px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">1,594,7360
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:784px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:784px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.59%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:784px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:825px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Sonray Capital Markets Pty Ltd 1,236,842
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:825px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:825px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.46%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:825px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:865px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Argo Investments Limited 1,050,000
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:865px;left:531px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:865px;left:625px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">0.39%
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:865px;left:663px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:905px;left:161px;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:11pt;white-space:nowrap;">Idameno (No 79) Nominees Pty Limited 724,210</div>
<div style="position:absolute;top:1103px;">
</body></html>
Thanks..........................

Resizing PNG with Pixel values; Save as artboard name and pixel value

Hello,
first off, I have never written a Javascript before and I am attempting to. I have been reading like mad to wrap my head around the Extendscript Toolkit (ESTK) in CS6. I see the awesome potential but I am concerned my idea may not be completely possible. That's why I thought I would ask the experts here.
I have a client who needs cursors and icons for apps that are saved out in multiple, transparent PNG sizes and the output filename needs to reflect that name. So for example, I have 2 square artboards, one contains a red car, the other contains the same car but in green, and I want to save both of those as 96x96 pixels, 72 x72 pixels, 48x48, 36x36, and 24x24 (5 different sizes). I would like the naming scheme to be taken from the artboard name (car_red, car_green) and the pixel value of each size, so the final name would be "car_red_0096x96.png", "car_red_0072x72.png", etc., etc.
The first thing I noticed is that there seems to be no SaveforWeb object in the ESTK. I discovered ExportOptionsPNG24 which is nice, but it seems to only give a sizing property based on percent (horizontalScale, or verticalScale). I would like to use the script to make any size artboard the exact pixel dimensions I need, and the percentage scaling property will not allow this, so is there a way to enter in pixel values and not percentage scale values?
This of course leads me to my next question: I was hoping to get the script to, at the press of a button, export the selected artboard to all 5 sizes, with a naming scheme that uses the artbaord name as a prefix and the pixel size as the suffix. I was hoping to use the pixel value in the code to apply to the suffix
Is any of this possible?
Gratefully,
Dave

I ran a basic test and this should be close enough for you to tweek… Square artboards are assumed by this snippet… A few comments Inc. to help you…
#target illustrator
artboardsToPNGs();
function artboardsToPNGs() {
          if ( parseFloat( app.version ) < 15 ) { return; } // Its CS4 or above ( has artboards )
          if ( app.documents.length == 0 ) { return; } // No docs so end script
          app.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevel.DONTDISPLAYALERTS;
          var i, j, sizes, png24Opts, doc, dF, artBds, abName, scale, pngFile; // Script variables
          sizes = Array( 96, 72, 48, 36, 24 );
          png24Opts = new ExportOptionsPNG24(); // Options object
          png24Opts.matte = false; // Set the properties
          png24Opts.transparency = true;
          png24Opts.antiAliasing = true;
          png24Opts.artBoardClipping = true;
          png24Opts.saveAsHTML = false;
          doc = app.activeDocument;
          dF = Folder( Folder.desktop + "/AI Artboard PNG's" ); // A folder to save in
          if ( !dF.exists ) dF.create(); // Make folder to save in
          artBds = doc.artboards;
          for ( i = 0; i < artBds.length; i++ ) { // Loop the artboards collection
                    doc.artboards.setActiveArtboardIndex( i ); // Make artboard active one
                    abName = artBds[i].name; // Get name
                    for ( j = 0; j < sizes.length; j++ ) { // Loop the sizes Array
                              scale = ( sizes[j] / ( artBds[i].artboardRect[2] - artBds[i].artboardRect[0] ) ) * 100; // Use width assumed square
                              pngFile = File( dF.fsName + '/' + abName + '_00' + sizes[j] + 'x' + sizes[j] + '.png' ); // Concat a name string
                              png24Opts.horizontalScale = png24Opts.verticalScale = scale; // Set the scales
                              doc.exportFile( pngFile, ExportType.PNG24 ,png24Opts );
          app.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevel.DISPLAYALERTS;
          alert( 'All done…' );

What are high and low values in sharepoint 2013 user permissions?

So I hit this api:
http://win-a3q7ml82p8f/sharepoint_site/_api/web/roledefinitions/
And got the different high and low values. But I am not clear with what they mean:
For eg:
High: 176, Low: 138612833
and
High: 176, Low: 138612801
So for different values of Low how does it change the permissions?
For 176 its binary is 10110000. So looking at this table here: http://www.dctmcontent.com/sharepoint/Articles/Permissions%20and%20Mask%20Values.aspx
I can understand that 176 would mean the following set of permissions:
DeleteVersions
OpenItems
ApproveItems
But what's confusing me is, that user has OpenItems permissions but not ViewListItems permission? Am I wrong in understanding this?
Also how does the value of Low change the overall user permissions?
Note: I looked at this answer: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/9d6df168-e8f5-4323-8c34-0646c03eff68/rest-api-what-are-high-and-low-in-effectivebasepermissions-and-getusereffectivepermissions?forum=sharepointdevelopment
But honestly I cant understand what that means. Can someone help please?

check this blog may explain you...
http://jamestsai.net/Blog/post/Understand-SharePoint-Permissions---Part-1-SPBasePermissions-in-Hex2c-Decimal-and-Binary---The-Basics.aspx
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

PO and GR value differs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for