PO cancellation in SUS derives to.... ? :-)

Hi guys,
Quick question for SRM Gurus and SUS people =)
- What happens when the vendor cancels a PO in SUS ?
I would like to know if the "canceled items" appear again in order to create another PO.
In case of affirmative, Is XI mandatory for SUS right ? (always mandatory)
Somebody knows this ?
Best regards,
Diego

Hi Sachin,
Well... In fact, I was thinking about rejecting some positions only. (When the vendor can supply partially our PO).
Is this a yes right, the "reject" action puts the items in the Sourcing Cockpit again right ?
My real need is: I need to create a new PO using some "used" items (Items that were assigned to another PO and the vendor cannot supply). Is this the right way (with SUS) ?
XI: ok. thanks =)
Kind regards,
Diego

Similar Messages

MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

Hi All,
An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
Thanks
Jagan

Hi
Please go through the links below ->
purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
purchase order not create in sus
Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
Unable to determine logical system of sender
Help MM-SUS!
SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
Error in SUS PO creation
Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Regards
- Atul

Roles for Contact Person in MM-SUS Scenario

Hi !
When we create a contact person using the Create user option in SUS, we assign the roles to the contact person. These roles are basically the standard SAP roles for SUS. We have created Z-roles ( a copy of the standard roles) to restrict cetain txns for users and would like to assign these Z-roles to the contact person . How can we ensure that the Z-roles are displayed instead of the standard roles ?
Regards

Hi
Please go through these complete SUS-MM Configuartion detail links, which will definitely help ->
Roles:
SAP deliver standard roles with authorisations, if You want to maintain your own go to transaction PFCG.
There are two type of role:
- single role
- composite role - (one or more single roles)
To roles You can assign transaction codes, reports, URL links, etc. SAP System automatically creates the authorisations that you can set on Authorisations tab page.
Authorisation:
Authorization profiles must be generated before you can assign them to users. An authorization is generated for each authorization level in the browser view, and an authorization profile for the whole role as represented in the browser view.
Re: Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
Re: Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Re: Vendor Replication in SUS scenario
Re: SUS-MM for service items
Re: Central Person already exists
SUS and Central User Admin
Re: User roles.
Please look at following links for Roles and Authorizations 
Links for user roles:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/6714b6439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/271d24d86211d2961a0000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/e4/15e48efd6c11d296430000e82de14a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d3/559a4271c80a31e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/4e/52b74065448431e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For profiles and authorisations:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/67151e439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/20/efcbfed8a511d397110000e82de14a/frameset.htm
Regards
- Atul

An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred A:BBP_PD:002

Hi
I am doing a scenario in which I am integrating R3-XI-SUS for PO,ASN,GR and INVOICE.
In which PO and ASN working fine but when I am sending GR from R3 to SUS it is coming to XI correctly but it is received in SUS with error shown below.
An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred A:BBP_PD:002 -Document already exists. Check your entries Programm:: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include:CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002;
Do anyone have solution to this problem
it's urgent
thanks in advance
thanks and regards
Sami

Hi
Please see the following SAP OSS Notes, which will definitely help ->
Note 922190 - SRM-SUS: Confirmation response can not be identified in SUS
Other related OSS Notes ->
Note 1026638 - GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
Note 1051424 - Incorrect display of SUS Confirmations status
Note 1026326 - Cannot accept GR with role SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
Related links ->
SUS to SRM PurchaseOrderConfirmation error for limit order
Re: SRM ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmation fail going into SUS
Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

GR cancel posted in SUS created 101 in backend

We are in SRM6.0 SP03.
We have implemented SRM-SUS (extended classic scenario). When we cancel GR in SUS it creates reversal in SRM but it created 101 in backend. The IDOC is having 101. Please help.
Thanks, Sachin

Virender,
thank you for your reply, what sounds strange to me that in my POWL for GRN I have the button CANCEL/DELETE and the system ask me if i really want to delete the selected GR just before giving back that strange message.... It looks like if the functionality exists but doesn't work.
Are you sure you can't cancel a GR in SRM, what should be the procedure in this case?
Thank you in advance,
Fuffo

MM-SUS ASN Cancelation

Hello,
I have to implement the cancellation of ASN from SUS to MM. I look for BUS2231 (ASN) cancelled event but it is not triggered.
Has someone found a point to init the process? I mean, an exit or something where the program goes through when we cancel an ASN.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.
Nacho

Hello,
The main problem is that there is no way to know when the supplier cancels the ASN in SUS.
Another helpful information is how it is shown in the tables that the ASN is canceled.
thanks you in advance.
Nacho

Oracle 9i Release 2 on SUSE 10

Dear Sir,
It is stated that i have installed SUSE LINUX ENTERPRISE SERVER 10 with SP1 with oracle check box checked during SUSE installation.
Now i am trying to install Oracle 9i release 2 on that machine i have completed almost every prerequisit for Oracle 9i R2.
But when i start "./runinstaller" after sccessfully cross "WELCOME" screen, "FILE LOCATION" screen, "AVAILABLE PRODUCTS" screen when it comes on "INSTALLATION TYPES" screen i select ENTERPRISE EDITION it gives me error (with out any error no just with HELP RETRY CONTINUE AND CANCELLED BUTTONS) at Executing Pre-requisites i click on CONTINUE button and it went on nect screen of "DATABASE CONFIGURATION" screen i select General Purpose and click on next IT STUCK ON 85 % bar.
Kindly help me in this regard
Special thanks
Malik Adeel Imtiaz
Netsol Technologies LTD

hi
Kindly re-check the packages you have install while installation of SUSE linux
Recheck the pre-requites also ........for oracle ...
Cheers

Oracle 9i and suse 10.0

Hello everyone,
i have just been trying installing oracle 9i on sus linux 10.0, but whent i get on the first installer screen, the next button is not working (no action triggered) so as the exit button,
i can see some java exceptions in the console :
View passed to RootItemDataSource does not contain data in TopicTree format.
sun.io.MalformedInputException
also for :
View passed to KeywordDataSource does not contain data in TopicTree format.
sun.io.MalformedInputException
with loads of line containing classname and line numbers
on that point, all i can do is close the installer window by clicking ont he closing cross, clicking on 'about' button and uninstall other products
note that some line in the exceptions specify the message "unknown source"
how could i solve this problem ??

Hello,
perhaps this may help (from www.novell.com):
: buttons don't work
The NUMLOCK key on the numeric keyboard must be OFF when the installer is started or the Installer may not function correctly, like you cannot press any of the buttons. Cancel the installer, turn off NUMLOCK and restart the installer.

Send SRM Purchase order Cancellation request to Vendor using SAP PI

Hi gurus,
We have to build an interface to send Purchase order cancellation request to vendor once the PO is deleted in SRM using PI.
Could some one please send me out a document to set up this interface.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Catherine

Hi Catherine,
did you get any chance to go through the below links.
Purchase Order from SRM to SUS ( Supplier Self Service )
PO from SRM to supplier via PI 7.1 | SCN
Thanks,
Naveen

Material Document cancellation

Hi all SAP GURUs,
Please help me,
After I've cancelled a PO goods receipt material document using MBST, the cost (field MSEG-DMBTR) of the cancellation that shown in PO historical view is not the same as the original material document and there is no any other posting posted in between this two documents.
Below are more details on this problem.
Material posted with V (moving average cost).
Original mat doc : 1200pcs with cost 26,078.03
Cancalled mat doc : 1200pcs with cost 999,733.22
Does any one here know how the system calculates the cost? (field MSEG-DMBTR).
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Lee

Thanks Rajesha for replying,
Sorry, I am a bit slow in learning, maybe can I give you the actual scenario and hope that you can have the formula for me.
Exchanges rate USD to PHP = 1 USD = 46.11 PHP
Before GR :, STOH = 0, Moving Price = 0.
Step 1: 1st GR, 75KG = 75 USD, PHP = 3,458.25
Step 2: 1st IR, 75 KG= 75 USD, PHP = 3,458.25
Step 3: 2nd GR, 150KG = 150USD, PHP= 6,916.50
Step 4: 2nd IR, 150KG = 150USD, PHP = 6,916.50
Step 5: 3rd IR, 150KG (for local VAT, in local currency) = 7,016.47PHP (actual amount posted into GR/IR clearing)
Step 6, Cancellation of material document for 2nd GR with 150KG, SAP give the posting of USD 149.07 and 6,956.49 in PHP.
Question: How to derived the USD of 149.07 and PHP 6956.49?. Assuming that if USD 149.07 is correct, then when multiply with exchange rate of 46.11, we should get 6,873.62 in PHP but this was not the case? So I am not sure how to derived both these figures and not sure when cancellation of material document, SAP uses USD or PHP as the base for calculation.
Hope you can help me on this.
Thanks,
Regards,
Lee

Get indicator while cancelling an Invoice

Hi Experts
While cancelling the invoice VBRK-FKSTO is not 'X' in RV60AFZZ. VBRK-FKSTO changed to X after execution of RV60AFZZ.So suggest some alternative to derive some indicator or flag for cancellation of an invoice before we click on the save button.
Thanks in Advance!!!

HI ,
I am trying to get the indicator via user exit RV60AFZA, but unable to identify what indicator of XVBRK can be used for this.
It would be great help if you can provide me the exact logic .
Thanks & Regards,
Saurav

Cannot install WTK 2.2 on Suse Linux 10.2 with JDK1.6.0

Dear all, I've just tried to install the Java Wireless Toolkit on my Pc, I've Linux Suse 10.2 with JDK 1.6.0. When i execute the j2me_wireless_toolkit-2_2-linux-i386.bin i get this error
Enter a path to the Java 2 SDK: /usr/java/jdk1.6.0/bin
/usr/java/jdk1.6.0/bin/java
Testing /usr/java/jdk1.6.0/bin/java...
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassFormatError: Extra bytes at the end of class file com/sun/kvem/environment/JavaVersionTester
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:620)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:276)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319)
/usr/java/jdk1.6.0/bin is not a suitable Java interpreter
Enter a path to a Java 2 SDK (For example: /user/jdk1.4/bin). You can type "exit" to cancel installation.
There is somebody for helping me? Thank you!!!

Have you tried to use an older version of the JDK? Maybe the rather old WTK 2.2 is not working with the latest JDK. I use it with JDK 5.0 (or 1.5.0). Perhaps you should give it a try.

SUS / no goods receipt doc to backend in extended classic scenario?

Hello
have you any find a solution for problem
in SRM/SUS and goods receipt in extended classic scenario. Gr remains only in SRM not going to backend...
Brg Harri
Message was edited by: Harri Harkonen
Message was edited by: Harri Harkonen

Hi Christophe,
We also have this issue. Goods Receipt from SUS is created in SRM but is not posted in backend (we have implemented extended classic scenario).
I tried to use the BBP_DOC_SAVE_BADI to created an idoc which posts the material document in backend system (using fm IDOC_GR_CREATE).
The goods receipt is posted in backend this way.
Unfortunately we are not able to cancel or make a return delivery on this GR.
I am very interest in your FM. Could you please share this, or tell me what changes you made to the GR in SRM.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
Martijn

SRM 5.0 Exception E:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit in SUS

Hello,
We are in process of upgrade srm 4.0 to srm 5.0 , as configured Plan driven procuremnet with supplier enablement scenario . Connected R/3 (46 c) to SUS using PI 7.0 . But stuck in problem as no new vendor replicated in sus from R/3. XML message processing shows error at SUS system ie ..
"An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_BUPA:034 -Organizational unit 50000001 does not exist; check entries Programm:"
while successfully updated existing( working with srm 4.0 since last two years) vendors from same system ,
pls advise.
Regards,
Santosh
I am came across the organization plan change for srm 5.0. Want to be clarify that is it also applicable for SUS organization for vendors.
report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP
can any one light on it.
Message was edited by:
 Santosh Patil

Hi
Please read this carefully ->
See the following SAP OSS Notes as well ->
Note 957851 SRMSUS: Modification in usermanagement for CUA replication
Note 792364 SRM50/SUS/BP: Conversion of SUS business partner
Note 628547 SRM-SUS: Corrections for SUS 2.0 SP01: business partner,user
Report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP
[Convert Org. Units to Vendor Groups ]
Mode details
Mode Short text
0 Do not carry out structure checks
1 Business partner exists for root org.
2 Partner for root org. (only) has org. unit role
3 All level 2 nodes are org. units
4 All level 2 nodes have business partners
5 All level 2 nodes have (only) org. unit role
6 All level 3 nodes are org. units
7 All level 3 nodes have business partners
8 All partners (level 3) has (at least) org.unit + bidder role
9 All level 4 nodes are positions
Purpose of this report
This report converts the HR organizational model for external business partners (bidders, vendors, and their employees).
You have to run this report after an upgrade from BBP 2.0C, EBP 3.0, EBP 3.5, EBP 4.0 and SRM Server 5.0 for every root organizational unit of these external business partners (if you have several such root unit, you have to run the report several times).
This report does not run across clients, so you have to start it separately in every client that you have.
The conversion is required because, in the new HR organizational model, external objects can no longer be stored as object 'O' (=organizational unit); consequently, it is no longer possible to create positions for external objects.
This has the following effects for external business partners who are stored in the organizational model:
The old root object, the 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
The interim nodes that were created for reasons of system performance (each containing 100 vendors/bidders) will in future not be an organizational unit, but rather an organizational object of the type 'VG' (=vendor group)
The external business partners of the type Organization (bidders, vendors) are no longer represented by a separate organizational object (in other words, there is no longer an organizational object that has the identity relationship to the partner)
Since the org. object that previously represented the partners is missing, the business partners are now linked directly with the interim nodes (previously, the organizational unit for the partner, and not the partner itself, was linked)
If a business partner has a set of attributes that is different to the attribute values specified for the interim node, the partner in question is not linked directly to the interim node, but rather to another 'VG' object (which has the attributes of the partner), which in turn is linked to the interim node.
Previously, if an external business partner had an employee and this employee has a user in the system, the employee staffed the position in the organizational unit that represented the partner. However, since this organizational unit no longer exists, the position and the staffing relationship no longer exist either. This means, among other things, that there is no reporting option in HR that enables you to navigate from a user to the business partner of the user's company.
Since there is currently no way of directly assigning a user to a business partner (of the type Person), the organizational object 'CP' (=Central Person) is still used to establish this link.
Once the conversion report has run successfully, you will no longer be able to see the organizational structure of the external business partners by calling transaction PPOSA_BBP (or PPOMA_BBP).
However, a new transaction called PPOMV_BBP is available instead. You can use this transaction to display the converted (and newly generated) structure for bidders/vendors.
Prerequisites
Before you actually convert your organizational structure, you should let the report check the structure, and correct any errors that the report detects.
Features
The report has the following features:
A 'Check Only' mode is available, which you can use to check the consistency of the organizational structure of the external business partners at different levels
The report can be restarted. This means if the conversion is canceled due to errors or system problems, and you restart the report, it will recognize any new objects that have already been generated, thus ensuring that structure elements that have already been processed are not converted a second time (this is achieved by evaluating at runtime the log tables BBP_O_TO_VG_OBJ (for generated objects) and BBP_O_TO_VG_REL (for generated relationships)).
If you use table BBP_MARKETP_INFO to store the root organizational units, the report changes the old entries accordingly.
The report writes an application log (log object BBP_XPRA_O_TO_VG) in which messages are logged at two different levels; alternatively, you can request that the message be output directly ('WRITE', for background spool lists).
Although we do not recommend that you do this (because it can result in very long response times), you can run the report in parallel and thus convert several root organizational units at the same time.
Activities
Start the report for every 'Central Organizational Unit for Vendors' (root organizational units for external business partners) in every client that you use.
Annotations
We recommend that you do not use the 'Direct Message Output' option (that is, the option where an application log is not written) in conjunction with the 'Detailed Message Output' option for larger organizational structures, because every object and relationship that is generated will be output, and you will not feasibly be able to process this list.
Even if you use it in conjunction with the writing of an application log, the 'Detailed Message Output' option rarely makes sense if you have tens or hundreds of thousands of vendors/bidders.
Estimated work/expenditure necessary
The runtime for this report depends on the hardware, system load, and structure involved (for example, the number of vendors/bidders who have employees and users and, therefore, also positions, the number of vendors who have attributes different than those of the interim node, and so on).
As a rule of thumb, though, structures with vendors where 10% of users have their own individual attributes are processed at the rate of approximately 25,000 per hour.
Remember, however, that the time required depends to a large degree on the number of nodes where local attributes have been defined, and on the number of business partners who have users.
This can lead to situations where an organizational structure with 100,000 nodes but no local attributes or users can be converted more quickly that a structure with only 5,000 nodes but with local attributes and assigned users.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

Clariffications in MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0

Dear Team,
We are implementing MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0
We need to following clarifications
1 Once we create ASN in SUS, how to cancel the ASN. We are not able to see cancel button for ASNs
2 When we create GRN in ECC against the inbound delivery and perform Return Delivery, this Return Delivery is getting updated in SUS. But the ASN status is not changing to canceled. We are not able to perform new ASN for this. Also invoice is being allowed for these ASNs. How to control the same.
Request your inputs please
Regards,
Ravi

HI can you tell me how you get it solve?
thanks in advance.

PO cancellation in SUS derives to.... ? :-)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for