PO condition issue

Dear Expert,
Facing problem on SC where found the in BBP_PD there are 2 condition records. (1 manual condition price and the other 1 =
catalog condition price) price were created, where one of these is inactive (catalog). Will this caused the inactive condition and Pricing conditions are not transfered to the backend PO in backend system? And this caused PO transmission error?
Catalog -> SC -> error in PO transmission
Please advise.
Rgds

Hello,
I don't think so.
Check error message in monitoring transaction and in BBP_PD transaction: it will give you clues to inderstand what's happened.
Regards.
Laurent.

Similar Messages

Rebate Conditions issue (Pricing incorrect Order Viz Billing)

Hi Forum,
We have an issue with the rebate conditions.
User has created a credit memo request (VA01) due to change in the Price. Due to this change rebate accruals have got reduced. The rebate accruals should not be reduced in this case, since there is no material return.
There is a specific order reason while creating such credit memo requests Eg. ZXX.
As a solution to this we have created a new routine AAA and assigned to the rebate condition types in Pricing procedure.
This routine will function when there is a order reason ZXX entered in the Credit memo request (in VA01), therefore all the rebate condition types (assigned with routine AAA) will get deactivated in Conditions. This not change any accruals value. This is working correctly.
The issue is -
When the credit memo (VF01) is created, these condition types are again activated and accruals are posted.
This should not happen. Pricing from the CM request (VA01) should get copied in Credit memo (VF01) completely.
When we open the Credit memo we find all the conditions are activated and accruals posted.
Is there any one who has faced the similar issue in billing documents where pricing data is not getting copied from Order conditions.
Please help.
Thx / Sheetal

Hi Sheetal,
Suggest to make a seperate CR memo order type for cases wherein you don,t want reduction of rebate accruals.
You would have to redetermine a new pricing procedure (create one keeping all condition type as are in Billing procedure except rebate) and assgin the determination of new PP basis the sales areacustomer PPOrder PP.
Pls go through the below link.
Re: New pricing procedure in credit note created w.r.t. billing document.
Regrds
Sanjay

Condition issue in BI Bex Designer Report...

Hi
In BI Bex Designer while writing the condition, may times I observed that If my condition doesn't work having its Characteristic Assignment is set to "All Characteristics in the Drill-down Independently" which is default, but if I set the option to "Individual Chars and Char Combinations" & check all the fields, it works.
But most of the time default nature works unlike above. Just wanted to find out: what is the rule?
May someone help me in this issue.
Thanks...

To my knowledge when you select All Characteristics in the Drill-down Independently, condition works with respect to the characteristics which are currently drilled down in your report.
But when you select Individual Chars and Char Combinations, condition works on the characteristics which are currently drilled down in your report and also the characteristics that are available in free charactritics.
So I think All Characteristics in the Drill-down Independently and Individual Chars and Char Combinations and selecting all the characteristic checboxes are not the same. All Characteristics in the Drill-down Independently and Individual Chars and Char Combinations and selecting the characteristics which are in your rows are the same.

If Condition Issue

Hi Friends,
I have added a table in the template in which one of the column has value of Quantity and in the same column I added one more field for UOM. I need to display UOM only when the quantity exists. So i wrote an IF condition
that if QTY column is not null then show the UOM.
<?if:TRIAL_QTY_MASS!= ''?> <?UOM?> <?end if?>
The issue is it always gives a line break and prints UOM below the Quantity. There is enough space in the column but still the UM will print below one line. Same issues are there for other columns wherever i am using the IF statement.
Could someone provide any solution.

Given this xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<query numrows="2" queryname="UOM" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="">
<row rownumber="1">
<LOCATION>HOME</LOCATION>
<TRIAL_QTY_MASS> </TRIAL_QTY_MASS>
<UOM>EA</UOM>
</row>
<row rownumber="2">
<LOCATION>WORK</LOCATION>
<TRIAL_QTY_MASS>15</TRIAL_QTY_MASS>
<UOM>TONNE</UOM>
</row>
<row rownumber="3">
<LOCATION>WORK1</LOCATION>
<TRIAL_QTY_MASS>16</TRIAL_QTY_MASS>
<UOM>EA</UOM>
</row>
</query>
And given you have a template with a table of one row and two columns, each cell with one field.
If in the first cell the field has the following:
<?for-each-group:row;./LOCATION?><?sort:LOCATION;'ascending';data-type='text'?><?LOCATION?>
If in the second cell the field has the following:
<?for-each:current-group()?><?if:TRIAL_QTY_MASS!= ' ' ?> <?concat(TRIAL_QTY_MASS , UOM)?> <?end if?><?end for-each?><?end for-each-group?>
I think you will get what you seek.

Discount Condition Issue

Dear All
We face a serious requirement with our client .
Company wants to give discount of Rs, 50,000 as a sales intensity for the dealer.
This is for each line item where the discount is 10000 for 5 line item.
Discount of Rs 50,000 is given as below
Sales Order 1
Line item 1 Discount 10,000
Line item 2 Discount 10,000
Line item 3 Discount 10,000
Line Item 4 Discount 10,000
Line Item 5 Discount 10,000
Now we reject Line item 30 ( Reason for rejection)
Our issue here is, when a line item is rejected this discount amount has to be out of the pricing calculation. ie ( I need to utilize this 10,000) to any other line item.
This amount is getting out of the sales order only if the line item is deleted.
However the sales order created is not deleted in system in order to have the history of the sale order placed by dealer.
Sales Order is being created through Interface. Hence I cannot go and re determine the prices once the line item is rejected.
Can any one help me with a solution / guidance.
On the above scenation my question is
How the discount amount allocated to a line item in sales order can be withdrawn if the Line item is rejected. ( Not deleted).
Please help.
Regards
Ganesh
9962096968
Message was edited by: Ganesh Raj

Dear Ankit,
Once the pricing procedure is downloaded, please maintain the document pricing procedure at service contract header level, and maintain the customer pricing procedure at business partner sales area billing data.
In spro, maintain the pricing procedure for the combination of sales area, document pricing procedure, customer pricing procedure.
Please crosscheck whether the condition table is active or not.
Regards,
Maddy

Pricing Header Condition Issue.

Dear Friends,
In the sales order we are using the header condition for distributing the values to the sales order line items 10, 20, 30u2026etc, if I have activated reason for rejections to line item 10, the header level condition value should not be shared to the line item 10,
Eg: Header Condition Value: 600, it is distributed to line item 10, 20, 30 on value basis, so the Values are Line Item u2013 10 = 200, 20 = 100, and 30 = 300.
Here If have activated Reason for rejection for line item 20, the header condition value 600/- should be distribute to line item 10 = 240, 30 = 360. Header condition value should not be distributed to Line item 20. it should be 0/-.
Friends please suggest me how to over come this issue.
Regards,
Hari Krishna

Check in your customization for the Reason for rejection that you are using in your sales order (I think the path is spro-sd-sales-Sls doc item-Reason for rejection.
The Statistical field in that should be X. If there is an X, then as soon as you reject line 20 with that Reason, the values would be redistributed to the other 2 remaining line items.

Dynamic select list with display,return val & join condition issue.

hello,
I am having a dynamic select list with display, return value
say for example my select statement is
select distinct dname d, deptno r
from dept dt
right join emp e on (e.deptno=dt.deptno)
where (condition)
when i tried this query for my select list, it is not working. It saying that
" LOV query is invalid, a display and a return value are needed, the column names need to be different. If your query contains an in-line query, the first FROM clause in the SQL statement must not belong to the in-line query. "
I am not able to understand the problem. Can anyone help me out with this issue?
thanks.

Shouldn't your join have dept as the driving table?
select distinct dname d, deptno r
from dept dt
right join emp e on (dt.deptno = e.deptno)
where (condition)
Or using older Oracle standard join
select distinct dname d, deptno r
from dept dt, emp e
where (dt.deptno (+) = e.deptno) AND (OTHER WHERE condition)
OR
(Since a right join is just getting the values from the driving table that are NOT in the associated table)
select distinct dname d, deptno r
from dept dt
WHERE dt deptno NOT IN (SELECT deptno FROM emp) AND (OTHER where condition)
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX

KODO 4.2 - RACE condition issue

Hi All,
Recently we have migrated our application (DEM ap0467) to Weblogic 10.3 on 20 FEB 2010. Since then we are observing that there is a race condition occurring in the code where it is interacting with the database.
We use KODO for interacting with the database & this version of weblogic supports KODO 4.2, earlier to this we were using KODO 4.0.1. After upgrading KODO to become compatible with new version of Weblogic we have seen this acute problem in working of our application.
Whenever new trade comes in our application one process picks the data, inserts and commits it in database & publishes the message on internal queue, another MDB picks this msg from this queue & fires select query on the DB but this time it doesn't find the data from database & throws an exception giving error "... Not found in Database" but when we check the database, the data remains present there.
So our primary analysis says that the KODO is not flushing data to the database on time & it tries to keep this data in memory only & so in the next step the other process doesn't find the data in DB.
We tried using different properties of KODO to flush data to the DB as soon as it gets change such as
kodo.FlushBeforeQueries
but its not working.
So could you please give some pointers who know this issue or could help on KODO from oracle support ?

Try closing the entityManagerFactory itself before publishing the message. This will force Kodo to flush all data.
This is not the permanent solution since closing and opening the entityManagerFactory with each request is expensive But this will ensure the that its Kodo issue.

Fright condition issue

Hi ,
we are using header condition (value based) .and its working fine.
eg: order qty 10 kg
frieght amt 4000
delivery qty 8kg and the invoice frieght amount is calulated on 8 kg ie 3200.
But the issue is that my client doesnt wants the frieght amount to be changed in the invoice, weather he delivery 10kg, 8kg or 5kg the frieght amount must be same in the order and invoice ie 4000.
please help me.
Regards
shrinath

Hi sangshetty
Even after making the calculation rule as fixed in condition type details once you are changing the quantity it is affecting the freight amount
check the calculation rule in VK12 . if it is fixed amount calculation type in VK12 then Change the pricing type in VTLA and VTFL copy controls as per your requirement
Regards
Srinath

SQL query with lots of conditions issue..

Working on A large query that hits a large DB of parts.
The table I am given these parts are broken up into 4 fields.
Section,Groupid,Subgroupid,Component
When I hit this table, i am given a list of all the possible combo's of the 4 fields that can be used for that lookup at that time.
The problem is its SLOW when this list is pretty big.. a lot of times, over 200 rows of combos... so end up with something like below,
but stripped down for explaining...
So a generic version the query..
Select * from PartTable where
( (section='blah1') and (groupid='blah2') and (subgroupid='blah3') and (component='blah4') ) or
( (section='blah5') and (groupid='blah6') and (subgroupid='blah7') and (component='blah8') ) or
( (section='blah9') and (groupid='blah10') and (subgroupid='blah11') and (component='blah12') ) or
( (section='blah250') and (groupid='blah251') and (subgroupid='blah252') and (component='blah253') )I have changed it to a deal where I have a subquery and do a case statement to query a subquery, but the problem I run into that
is, is that 10g only allows so many. I can get around this by when i generate the query, to just make multiple case statements and then
modify my where statement.. but seems sloppy.. but "Works" .. using the OR statement deal, it can take near 30 seconds... with the
sloppy looking multiple case statement field deal, it takes 1.6 seconds..

870023 wrote:
Try creating Index on these columns. Will help in CPU cost.That is one of the most useless pieces of advice I have ever seen.
CPU cost does not necessarily reflect performance. Creating too many indexes can also slow down performance. The first way of tackling a performance issue is to find out what the cause is, before trying to figure out the best way to fix it.
{message:id=9360003}

IF condition issue - Urgent

Hi Gurus,
i have two requirements, for that i am using IF condition but its not giving proper results.
for first requirement iam using code like this
1) <?xdofx:if QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 then 'N/A' else if AcceptableFlagDisplay = 'Yes' then 'Y' else 'N' end if?>
but above code is not working
2)<?xdofx:if QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 then 'N/A' else ServiceProvidedBy end if?>
above code is aslo not working
Please help me whats wrong in my code.
Thanks,
Sri
Edited by: user7498756 on Aug 2, 2011 1:49 PM

1) <?xdofx:if QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 then 'N/A' else if AcceptableFlagDisplay = 'Yes' then 'Y' else 'N' end if?>
but above code is not working
<?choose:?>
<?when:QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 ?>N/A<?end when?>
<?when:AcceptableFlagDisplay ='Yes'?>Y<?end when?>
<?when:AcceptableFlagDisplay !='Yes'?>N<?end when?>
<?otherwise:?><?end otherwise?>
<?end choose?>2)<?xdofx:if QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 then 'N/A' else ServiceProvidedBy end if?>
above code is aslo not working
<?choose:?>
<?when:QuantityActual='' or QuantityActual=0 ?>N/A<?end when?>
<?otherwise:?><?ServiceProvidedBy?><?end otherwise?>
<?end choose?>

Mapping Condition issue, Value not coming in multiple segments.

Hi All,
File to Idoc scenario.
My file looks like below.
HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"
AF "disc-rsn"
RK "007287001" A
KE disc-code "007287"
KE addr-num "001"
DF w-phone "03 98483299"
AF "drs"
RK "007287" A
KE dr-num "007287"
DF affil "OPSM"
DF country "0"
AF "disc-rsn"
RK "dr-addraddress-1 17287|1EN" A
KE disc-code "008287"
KE field-name "address-1"
KE element " 1"
T 16
Condition:
I have a condition where I need to create an Idoc segment Z1disc when row - "AF "disc-rsn"" exists.
For the filed "Z1disc-CODE", I need to pass the value when row "KE disc-code" exists,
Result:
From my file, AF "disc-rsn" exists twice, so I created 2 Z1disc segments.
Coming to the field "Z1disc-CODE", the value "KE disc-code" exists twice in the file. After mapping, the value is coming only once in the first segment. The field "CODE" is not coming in the second segment like below.
Idoc
-- Zdisc
--- Lang -- E
--- Code -- "007287"
---Zdisc
Lang -- E
When the check the display queue, it is showing like below
SUPPRESS
007287
007287 -- (Context)
008287
008287-- (Context)
It showing correctly from display queue, but the value are not populating except in first segement.
For your information, After content conversion, my source xml will look like below.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_Optum xmlns:ns="http://luxottica.com/SAP_CRM/DirectSales/OptomDiscount">
- <RecordSet>
<Row>HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>RK "007287001" A</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>KE disc-code "007287"</Row>
Kindly help me, I'm trying all the options and it is not working.
Is there anything I need to change in Source structure?
Thanks
Deepthi.

Hi Aravind,
Here is my Source message.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <MT_XIOptum>
- <Header>
<HRow>HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"</HRow>
</Header>
- <Detail>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
<Row>RK "007287001" A</Row>
<Row>KE disc-code "007287"</Row>
<Row>KE addr-num "001"</Row>
<Row>DF fax-num ""</Row>
<Row>DF in-out "I"</Row>
<Row>DF phone-2 ""</Row>
<Row>DF post-code "3108"</Row>
<Row>DF provider-num "4349201J"</Row>
<Row>DF rec-stat "A"</Row>
<Row>DF w-phone "03 98483299"</Row>
<Row>AF "drs"</Row>
<Row>RK "007287" A</Row>
<Row>KE dr-num "007287"</Row>
<Row>DF affil "OPSM"</Row>
<Row>DF country "0"</Row>
<Row>DF descript "KK"</Row>
<Row>DF rec-stat "A"</Row>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
<Row>RK "dr-addraddress-1 17287|1EN" A</Row>
<Row>KE disc-code "008287"</Row>
<Row>KE field-name "address-1"</Row>
<Row>KE element " 1"</Row>
</Detail>
- <Trailer>
<TRow>T 25</TRow>
</Trailer>
</MT_XIOptum>
Row> -> [removeContext] ->[ equalsS "disc-rsn" ] -> [createIf] -> <Zdisc>
This Part is working.
<Row>> startWith2>IF
KE disc-code-->THEN > removeContexts>SplitbyValue>SUBSTRING>Code.
When I check the display queue at Code. I'm getting the below values.
SUPPRESS
007287
007287 -- Context change
008287
008287-- Context Change
Only 007287 is displaying in FIrst segment "Z1Disc" and second value "008287" not coming in second segment "Z1Disc".
Anything is wrong?

Pricing Schema Header Condition Issue

Dear gurus,
how can I do this?
Item 1:Sales Price:100 eurMWST:18eur
Item 2:Sales Price:200 eurMWST:36eur
In header:
Sales Price: 300eur
MWST:54eur
Total:354eur
There is a HEADER condition as YOFI:
YOFI:355eur
YODI=YOFI-TOTAL
Problem is SAP multiples YOFI(which is header condition) to items.
As a result calculation is wrong.
How can I fix it?
Regards,

You don't want YOFI to be distributed to items correct? If so, then in t.code V/06, for condition type YOFI, remove the checks in the boxes of group condition,item condition, quantity and check by creating a new sales order.
Regards,

Pricing condition issue

Hello Experts,
My business scenario is that I have several surcharges which are count on different conditions. After all I need to create the condition that would be a sum of all mentioned surcharges. Basically I know pricing but for some reason I can't force this problem.
In pricing procedure, after list of my surcharges, I made a standard summary (without condition type) in step 30. This sum works fine (gives a right value). After this sum I put my condition (ZSAM), which is counted directly from above sum (from step 30 to 30). It doesn't work. Value is '0' any time.
Some settings in condition type ZSAM:
Cond. class - A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type - C Quantity
Can You tell what could I missed in my configuration?
Thanks in advance,
Michal

Dear Michal,
Earlier respondent Rightly mentioned in addition to that,
You need to maintain Calculation type as A-Percentage instead of C -Quantity for the ZSAM condition type, because you are going to calculate the ZSAM from the Sum(Value) so you need to give % of the sum.
If you give quantity it will based on the material quatity not based on the sum value.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Multiple Condition Issue

Hi Experts,
I have a problem of trying to utilize multiple conditions on a query. I have two conditions like this:
keyfigure A < 0
keyfigure A Bottom 10
What is happening is that it is finding the bottom 10 values and then filtering out the values. So instead of displaying 10 values, I only get a few.
I have tried changing the order of the conditions and such, but it doesn't seem to affect the results. I currently have the two conditions mentioned above in separate conditions. (My understanding is that this produces an AND effect.)
Any thoughts on how to force it to do the filtering first and then order?
Thanks in advance.

Have you tried using a pre-query? That way, the first selection is forced to happen before the second.
Here's the Help documentation... once you understand how to use it, its very powerful.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/2c/78a03c1178ad2ce10000000a114084/content.htm
Points?
PAtrick

PO condition issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for