Po creation from qm notification

Sir,
I have a scenario like this
When ever there is sortage happen for a raw material during production
i want to make a manual notification from QM for the sortage of material, and as per this notification they want to rice a purchase order for that material
Pls tell me how to handle this scenario and wether we want to create a new notification type itslef
pls clarify
Faisal

Dear Joydeep,
In contrast to a purchase requisition, it is possible to create more than one PO in reference to a RFQ.
A RFQ only gives information about the price for which can be ordered from a vendor. The system does therefore not reject you from ordering again from the same vendor with the best conditions.
Once you create a PO with reference to an RFQ, if the quantity in PR to which the RFQ is refering is exhausted,
the user is prevented from creating further PO only with reference to the PR. But the user can create Purchase orders refering to a RFQ as long as the validity period of the RFQ is still valid.
Regards,
ian, Wong Loke Foong

Similar Messages

Creation of a refurbishment order from the notification is not supported

Hello All,
I would like to know whether we can create Refurbishment Order directly from Refurbish. Request Notification.
Currently when trying to do that I'm getting error message saying that 'Creation of a refurbishment order from the notification is not supported'.
SAP doesn't support that kind of scenario or I'm missing some configuration?
Thanks in advance
G.

Hello again,
Thanks for your answer but I would like to get some more clarification.
What I would like to do is create Refurbishment Order from the notification directly by clicking create button which seats just next to order field or from the menu Notification -> Create -> Direct.
I'm getting pop up window where Order Type is filled in automatically because of the config I made. Then I just fill in Main Work Center field and hit continue. Afterwards message 'Creation of a refurbishment order from the notification is not supported' appears.
Can you confirm that above described scenario is not supported by SAP.
Thanks in advance.
G.

Deletion of Measuring points from the Notification

Hi
I have created a notication and attched manully some measuring point. (Extras-->Measuing document, New Entries and added the measuing points). I want to delete the measuring points from the notification. It displayes the msg "1 MeasDocs cannot be deleted as they already exist in the database"
Note:The measuring points are not attached to the tech object.
Please let me know how can we delete this MP's or what alternative i need to follow.
The system msg display below:
HELP msg "
1 MeasDocs cannot be deleted as they already exist in the database
     Message no. IR 018
Diagnosis
     You are trying to delete measurement documents that the system has
     already written to the database.
System Response
     The system cannot perform the function.
     You can only delete measurement documents online at the creation stage.
     Once you have saved a measurement document, you can only delete it using
     a special reorganization program."
Thanks & regards,
Mujeeb

hi
For using archiving programme take help of basis help see firstly create programme on archiving object
PM_IMRG whcih is the object for measuring document then by ebtering this prepare the archving file run in test mode
then deletion of data with date wise reading in test mode follwed afterwards.
you have to confirm the data before the deletion
Regards
chandrashekhar

Generating Purchase Req. / Purchase Ord. from Maintenance Notification

Hi all,
Is there any way we can create a purchase requisition(PR) or purchase order(PO) from a Maintenance Notification? I know we can create PR/PO from Maintenance Order but our client doesn't want to take that route.
To add more info, the piece of equipment for which the notification will be raised, is created with a link to a material in MM (Serial Data tab in equipment master). We also have a vendor partner attached to the equipment as well as notification. We need to generate PR/PO from the maintenance notification which is raised for this piece of equipment.
Any help / pointers / suggestions are welcome.

Thanks Pete
Is there one, or many PRs to a single notification
There needs to be only one PR for a single notification. The notification pertains to only one piece of equipment, and once the PR -> PO -> GR cycle is completed, the notification will be closed. Next time, if the equipment fails, a new maintenance notification will be created. So, yes, there will be only one PR for a maintenance notification.
How will you handle missing data e.g. vendor, material, etc
The material no. for that particular piece of equipment is maintained in the equipment master (material field in the Serial number view). Also, we maintain vendor number under partners for the equipment master data. We should be able to use these while creating PR from notification. At least that's what is our initial thought. Please correct me on this.
What will be the account assignment for the PR
I'm not sure about this one though, I'll confirm with the MM consultant and update this reply.
Will the notification user-status be update on PO creation, GR, IR, etc
Yes, thanks for bringing this up. The client intends to use this functionality to check the availability of the equipment. So, not only the notification's user status should update based on PO status, but also the piece of equipment's user status should also get updated when the notification is closed and the piece of equipment is available.
Will the notification be referenced in the PR/PO
Not exactly, but there should be a report available which will list all the PRs / POs raised for maintenance of a particular piece of equipment. So, if notification is linked to PR/PO, we may be able to generate this report easily. Again, correct me if I'm wrong on this.
Do you want to limit who can create the PRs
Well, if we are talking about auto-creation from notification, then only the person releasing the Notification will be able to generate PR indirectly. If it is manual creation, then yes, we will need to restrict this authority to limited people.
Please let me know if these responses help you understand my requirement and give any other possible solution.

Creation of PM Notification based on UD Code

Hi Seniors
I am new to PM/QM module and facing an issue while configuring UD code follow-up actions.
My requirement is once the Valution Code is set to "Rejected" in UD code then follow-up action should be generated and in this follow up action, couple of actions should take place :
1. Set the equipment status (QFOA_OBJECT_STATUS_SET). It is happening
2. Set the order status to TECO (QFOA_ORDER_TECHNICAL_COMPLETE). It is also happening
3. Creation of a Notification so that based on that notification, corresponding order followed with PR/PO to be created for procuring of the equipment.
I am not able to find out the way how to address Pt. No. 3. Kindly help
Thanks
Manmohan K Bajaj

Hi,
Thanks Seenu,
So i have to clasify based on Maintenance activity types. If there are activities like repair, shutdown, testing etc. then i will have to create work center based on that?
So i can create some activities like, Modification, Repair, standby, waiting etc and assign work center for each?
Here we are following 4 maintenance planning preventive, predictive, breakdown & shutdown so is it possible to make 4 work center according to those.
please correct me if i m wrong. i really have no much idea in this. any help or suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Ramya

Automatic PO creation from SC

Hi Experts,
I am using SRM 7.0 with extended classic scenario and I have issue in the automatic po creation. For some Shopping Carts the PO is not automatically created. The SC is having Source of Supply Assigned and all the approves have completely approved the SC. The latest status is I1111 Item in Transfer Process.
I checked in RZ20, ST22 and could not find any error or dumps.
For the SC item under BBP_PDBEI the BE_OBJECT_TYPE is BUS2201 and BE_OBJECT_ID 1, once I trigger the PO creation manually the PO object id is reflected here.
For such SC I am running the report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED manually which puts the SC in I1112 Error in Transmission Status and later I can trigger the SC creation from the alert monitor.
For POs created in this manner the PO is created in Held Status without any line items, is this normal?
I have two questions which I want to understand, how is the automatic po creation from SC setup, is there any customizing involved for the po creation from SC to happen automatically?
What else should I check to find the reason why the the SC was stuck in I1111 status and PO was not created?

You need to configure the Purchasing group and this will take care of automatic transfer of Doc to sourcing cockpit. Make sure you also maintain the customization for sourcing always carried out for Prod categories.
Regards
Saurabh

Automatic PO creation from PR with no master data

Dear gurus,
Is it possible to run ME59- Auto PO creation from approved PR with no master data/source assigned/PIR? Assuming user create adhoc PR.
Is it possible to run this process successfully if i didn't meet on the criteria below? let say no.1 is not checked?
1.Material Master purchasing view, check automatic PO check box.
2. Vendor Master purchasing view, check automatic PO check box.
3. Maintain Source list for Vendor and Material (transaction ME01) and also see validity period.
4. Maintain Purchase Info Record (transaction ME11), check info record category (must be standard or pipeline or subcontracting)
5. Create a Purchase Requisition ( transaction ME51N), during creation select check box of Source Determination.
6. Use transaction ME59 and execute for purchase requisition for vendor, you will be able to create automatic PO.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
yes all point should be checked
check following link
[http://www.sap-img.com/materials/steps-to-create-auto-po.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Purchase Order Creation from ME5A Report

Hi experts,
My client wants Purchase Order Creation from ME5A Report.
He wants show Open Purchase Requisition through ME5A report then he will select Purchase Requisition Number or line item for po creation from there only.
Please advice how I can map this process in sap.
Thanks in advance,
Chandhu

Why don't you use ME57 to display open PRs and then assign sources and convert them to PO?
Or use ME57 to assign sources and ME59 to automatically convert them to PO.
You can create your very own format for report display using custom "Scope Of List" for ME57.
Look in SPRO under Purchasing>Reporting>Maintain Purchase requisition lists.

IDOC/BAPI for Production order creation from Legacy system

Hi all
We are using an interface to create Production orders from legacy to SAP. Would you recommend an IDOC or a BAPI to create Production orders. If IDOC or BAPI then could you please mention which one?
thanks a bunch

Hi John,
For your purposes, please use BAPI for production order creation from legacy system. There is no standard inbound IDoc available to use. SAP has an IDoc for outbound interface only (message type LOIPRO).
If there is an inbound IDoc available, I would recommend to use an IDoc.
IDoc technology has excellent error handling and will allow you to reprocess an error (if any).
BAPI is also good approach to use and fast in term of processing.
For BAPI approach, you can use BAPI BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

How to remove sender name in field "From" in Notification page

I would like to remove name ( LIUNI, ANTONIO_ ) (bold text and underline) from message and field "From" in notification page.
I have 2 problems below:
1.) This message "_*LIUNI, ANTONIO*_ has completed their appraisal of KERINS, ANNE MARY"
Should change to "A multirater has completed their appraisal of KERINS, ANNE MARY"
2.) Field From, must be blank: From: LIUNI, ANTONIO_ -> From: <Blank>
It call standard workflow HRSSA.
Please provide me coding in controller to set item attribute values in field "From" to blank and remove sender name in message+
Below is the example notification:
This notification does not require a response.
LIUNI, ANTONIO_ has completed their appraisal of KERINS, ANNE MARY.
Personalize "Notification Details Function"
Personalize "Notification Details Attributes"
Personalize Table Layout: (leftTable)
From LIUNI, ANTONIO_
To BILLOUD, CLAIRE
Sent 26-Apr-2010 09:53:06
ID 66666475
Personalize Stack Layout: (rightStack)
Personalize Table Layout: (rightTable)
Personalize Stack Layout
Personalize Stack Layout
Personalize "Summary"
Edited by: jamras on Apr 26, 2010 1:34 AM

Thank you for your reply.
Do you mean region in notification page?
Below is region in notification page.
Field From is in Region: /oracle/apps/fnd/wf/worklist/webui/NtfDetailsAttr.leftTable
Document Name /oracle/apps/fnd/wf/worklist/webui/NtfDetailsAttr
Message is in Region: Notification Details Function
Document Name /oracle/apps/fnd/wf/worklist/webui/NotifDetailsRG
Now I'm working on extension controller in the page below (I'm submit button in this page).
/oracle/apps/per/selfservice/appraisals/webui/PartCompletePG
My controller -> fao.oracle.apps.per.selfservice.appraisals.webui.FaoPartCompleteCO
I put the following coding in this controller. It removed value in workflow attribute, but it didn't remove value from notification page.
SSHRParams sshrparams = new SSHRParams(oapagecontext.getRootApplicationModule());
String wfItemType = sshrparams.getItemType();
String wfItemKey = sshrparams.getItemKey();
// String wfProcess = "HR_APPRAISAL_DETAILS_JSP_PRC"; ///sshrparams.getProcesName().toString();
wfClass.setItemAttrText(oapagecontext, wfItemType, wfItemKey,
"HR_APPRAISAL_FROM_USER_ATTR", "");
wfClass.setItemAttrText(oapagecontext, wfItemType, wfItemKey,
"FORWARD_FROM_USERNAME", "");
wfClass.setItemAttrText(oapagecontext, wfItemType, wfItemKey,
"FORWARD_FROM_DISPLAY_NAME", "");
wfClass.setItemAttrText(oapagecontext, wfItemType, wfItemKey,
"FORWARD_FROM_PERSON_ID", "");
wfClass.setItemAttrText(oapagecontext, wfItemType, wfItemKey,
"HR_APPRAISAL_FROM_NAME_ATTR", "");
Thank you for your help.

Blocking RdA creation from Sales Order Schedule Line

Hi Gurus,
please do you know if there is a way to block the RdA creation from Sales Order schedule line, for TAS item category? I tried with Header Delivery block without quantity confirmation but even if quantity on schedule lines are not confirmed, RdA is created anyway.
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

thank you

Why does iMessage continue to make sounds and display banners on my Macbook Pro (Retina) even though I have removed it from my notification center?

I hate that my messages pop up while I'm watching Netflix, and I have finally removed Messages from my notification center. Yet, for some reason i still keep hearing the noise that lets me know I have a message, and I a still seeing badges pop up on my screen every time a new message comes in? What's the deal?

I talked to Apple Support and we at least stopped the bleeding, a little bit. These are the troubleshooting steps I did before I contacted Apple Support:
1. Reinstalled OSX
2. Restore the last known good Time Machine Backup.
This did not fix my issue, so I called Apple Support and they told me this:
1. Turn Power off.
2. Wait 15 seconds.
3. Plug in Magsafe adapter.
4. Wait 15 seconds.
5. Hold down the Shift+Option+Power Button for 20-30 seconds.
6. Turn Power back on.
Ok, this stopped the bleeding a little, but as soon as I plugged in a Apple USB Superdrive
and a Apple Mini Displayport to VGA Adapter. This "USB Devices Disabled" pop-up pops up like every 30 minutes now. At least, it is not constantly popping up after I close it, so I guess it will do for the temporary. Going to contact Apple support, later, though to see what else can be done.

Printer name is Truncated while creating TO in WM area from QM notification

Dear All,
While creating transfer order(WM) from QM notification. I am getting error "device <printer name> does not exist". Even though printer name is available i am getting this error. When the length of printer name is greater than 4 only i am facing this error.
while checking the screen 3000 in program SAPLQMLR . Field LTAP-LDEST is not checked for Scrollable option. Where as the same field is used in WM T.code LT01 there scrollable option is checked , if we select the same printer system is accepting.
I searched for SAP noted i dint find any thing related to this.
Have any one faced such problem and got any solution. If so please provide the details.
I would like to get suggestion to over come this bug.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Srihari.P

There is a notes available in SAP. Using this only it is possible to solve this problem
Regards
Srihari P

Item category determination during Purchase Requisition creation from APO

Im creating a SNP Purchase Requisition in APO and when it is published to R/3, a Purchase Requisition document is created in R/3.
When this PR is created in R/3, I want the Item Category to be determined based on the Material master Special Procurement Type. ( eg: Id like the Item category to be L if the Material master Special Procurement Type = 30 (Subcontracting) ). But by standard, this field is coming as Blank and this field could only be populated during the creation from APO.
I found a user exit ( CIFPUR02 : Enhancement of Purchase Order Interface (Inbound) ) on R/3 where I tried to populate the Item Category, but when I do this, all the purchase order related data is getting deleted and hence no PRs are getting created in R/3.
Could anyone please tell me if this could be resolved using configuration and if not any tips to do this technically would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Harsha

Hi Karun,
This is the code i'm using...
select single * from marc into lit_marc
where matnr = c_eban-matnr
and    werks = c_eban-werks.
append lit_marc.
read table lit_marc with key matnr = c_eban-matnr
                             werks = c_eban-werks
                             sobsl = 30.
if sy-subrc = 0.
c_eban-pstyp = '3'.
endif.
Here sobsl = 30 is the Special procurement type
But when i try to populate c_eban-pstyp = '3', during the creation of Purchase Requisitions in R/3, in the program SAPLEMPI -> LMEPIF01
this condition is encountered which deletes all the data in the tables that is used to create Purchase requisitions.
<i>* get rsnum in the case of subcontracting
      IF XEBAN-PSTYP EQ PSTYP-LOHN AND                      "RB240999
         EXITFLAG_ORDID IS INITIAL.                         "RB240999
refresh all component tables
        CALL FUNCTION 'ME_COMPONENTS_REFRESH'
             EXCEPTIONS
                  OTHERS = 1.</i>
Could you please suggest me anything to get around this.
Thanks,
Harsha

Skip the Creation of Maintenance Notification

I would like to know the effect if i will skip or remove the process of creation of Maintenance notification in SAP PM. The process will start with the creation of Order, if there's an external service required the Maintenance Order will be converted into PO if no external service or material will close the Order.
Since the Creation of Maintenance Order will generate Notification, we were thinking that creation of Notification is redundant if the system allows to create order and notification in one transaction.
What would be the effect of this, thanks and God bless.

Greetings Peach,
As the experts, who had already answered observed, this is purely a business process consideration. If your (Client's) organization supports a "streamlined" process in which direct Order creation is beneficial you can go for it.
As you've written "Since the Creation of Maintenance Order will generate Notification, we were thinking that creation of Notification is redundant if the system allows to create order and notification in one transaction." I assume you are still using Notification and Order integration. But as Yogesh Dhokne mentioned, this is optional as well.
If you choose to create a Notification in the background, you can still register breakdown times for MTTF/MTBF calculations, Catalog Codes for tracking and any additional information once the Orders are created.
But consider this: How is work requested, released for execution and reported? If you only create Orders, you have only Orders to go on. Therefore, you might require more verbose User Status management, and you may find yourself with Orders that are being created unnecessarily and have to be closed, Orders being released prematurely... You have to have a very "flat" process around this immediate Order creation.
On the other hand, consider that having Notifications created prior means a more "deep" process and more overhead, but you can have a step to filter works to be released on the Notification level before Orders are created, if you have more than one Notification for the same work, you can assign it to a single Order, and you have more options when designing roles and authorizations, since you can separate access and business transactions for Notifications and Orders for your Operations and Maintenance users, if necessary.
Please ask further questions if you have any!

Po creation from qm notification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for