PO Creation with accrual account assignment

We have a scenario with Insurances and Software Licences fee, since the amount is quite high, the actual quaterly fee is
accrued every month to smoothen the effect in the books.
When we create PO, is it possible to assigin accrual account (instead of the usual expense code) in the account assignment column? So that, during the Goods receipt the accrual account will be reversed. This accrual account would be a balance open item managed account.
We developed the scenario through finance using a recurring entry document that automatically posts the desired values every month, but we need to make it through MM since the original invoice for the insurance or for the software must be entered through a Purchase Order.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: E.Barreda on Sep 7, 2009 11:24 PM

Hi,
Even if u make mandatory the io number in PO.
You cannot settle the asssts to that IO and budget control also not possible.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...

Hello All,
i am facing problem in confirming the limit order with unknown account assinment.We are using Extended classic scenario with SRM version 5.00 and ECC 6.00. When creating shopping cart with unknown account assignments, shopping carts is getting created fine but when processing goods receipt the system only prompts for distribution by cost center and we do not have the option to selected processing against other account assignment e.g. internal order or network. the Cost center is coming as gray.What i am expecting that as in known account assignment it asks for a drop down and user can select cost center or order the same should happened with unknown account assignment. we have not implemented any badi for the same.
please help me out. Is this a standard behavior of shop with limit order for unknown account assignment where it prompts for cost center only or do i need to implement any badi.

Hi
Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out ->
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
Other related details ->
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE with Multiple Account Assignment

Hi, Does anyone have an example code of this function with multiple account assigment values
Or suggestions to implement this FM
I´m beginner in abap
Thanks
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 14, 2008 12:47 PM

Hi, I saw that function,does anyone have a z program using this bapi
with Multiple Account Assignment structure
thanks

GR Non-Valuated with multiple account assignment

Hi, gurus;
some knows a user exit or badi that is used to undercheck the flag GR Non-valuated when PO with multiple account assignment is created (ME21N) ? It can have some consequence in later invoice verification?
Thanks in advance
R.Z.

gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account
this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
Thanks in advance.

Thanks Charlie.
I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
Please advise.
Thanks,

Services with multiple account assignment.

Hi all,
How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
Regards

Hi
Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
Cheers
Mukta

Asset PO with Multiple account assignment..!!!

Hi all ,
i am creating asset PO with multiple account assignment and having pricing condition 5.5% Octroi..
While doing the MIRO , system should distrubuted octorie amount to all the assets ( load to asset value )
But system is not capture the octorie amount in MIRO...
Any customization required for multiple account assignment in case of Asset PO ..??
Please help.

Hi,
In MIRO, item detail screen, you check for a button which allows apportionment of the value.
Regards
Aloysius

Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JM

Hi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas

PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

Hi ,
I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
Regards,
Sheetal

Hi ,
I have checked it intially and both are identical.
Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
But after approval it again went into error in process
Sheetal

PO with multiple account assignment

Hi Experts,
While creating PO for multiple account assignment system is automatically picking 'GR Non-Valuated' check box.After doing a GR no accouning document generated.
How is the goods receipt valuated for a purchase order with multiple account assignment?
Please explain.
Thanks,
Sanjana

Hi,
It is possible to create PO with multiple account assignment,but you will not get accounting document at the time of GR.it will happen at the time of MIRO,as i have allready explained.
If you will create PO with multiple account assignment for Services,System will generate Accounting document at the time of GR.
I hope it will clerify.
Regards,
Manish

Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds

Hi,
We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
I hope someone can help me.
Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo

Hi,
You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
Regards,
Ming

Problems with multi-account assignment in batch-input program

Hi everybody!
I'll create purchase orders with multi-account assignment via batch input.
When processing dynpro SAPMM06E 0113 I get the message:
"Batch-Input data for dynpro SAPMM06E 0113 are not available".
But all data are already filled in the accounting fields.
There is no way to go back to the position overview.
Here you can see the batch input coding of the multi-account assingment:
     PERFORM dynpro USING: 'X' 'SAPMM06E'        '0113',
                            ' ' 'BDC_CURSOR'      'EKKN-TWRKZ',
                            ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE'      '/00',
                            ' ' 'EKPO-WEPOS'      'X',
                            ' ' 'EKPO-WEUNB'      'X',
                            ' ' 'EKPO-VRTKZ'      wa_ekko_ekpo-vrtkz,
                            ' ' 'EKPO-TWRKZ'      wa_ekko_ekpo-twrkz.
      PERFORM dynpro USING: ' ' 'BDC_CURSOR'      'EKKN-ANLN1(14)',
                            ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE'      '/00',
                            ' ' 'EKPO-WEPOS'      'X',
                            ' ' 'EKPO-WEUNB'      'X',
                            ' ' 'RM06E-MKNTM(14)' ekkn_menge2,
                            ' ' 'EKKN-ANLN1(14)'   wa_ekko_ekpo-anln1,
                            ' ' 'EKKN-ABLAD(14)'   wa_ekko_ekpo-ablad,
                            ' ' 'EKKN-WEMPF(14)'   wa_ekko_ekpo-wempf.
                           ' ' 'BDC_SUBSCR'      'SAPLKACB'.
*(this is repeated for every accounting position)
     PERFORM dynpro USING: ' ' 'BDC_CURSOR'      'EKPO-VRTKZ',
                           ' ' 'BDC_OKCODE'      '=AB',
                           ' ' 'EKPO-WEPOS'      'X',
                           ' ' 'EKPO-WEUNB'      'X'.
Regards,
Anke
Message was edited by:
        Anke Chittka

Hi,
      1 .First record properly depen upon ur requirment,
      2. Test ur recorded code
      3. Note all OK-Code ( when u press any button) * this is important
      4. After that split ur recorded coding dep ur requirment (if u know all OK-Code u can split the recorded coding)
      5. call ur splided coding in ur prg.
i am having coding for PO but this is Dep my requirment

Delivery cost with multiple account assignment

Dear SAP gurus,
I found a problem in here. In my company we are using multiple account assignment in PO with multiple asset entered in one line. This PO actually will have customs and delivery cost inside of it, however it is not know at the time of PO creation. When the forwarder send the goods, sometimes the shipment can contain more than one PO as well, thus it is impossible to determine the exact value of delivery cost at the time of PO creation.
When the goods are delivered in the FOB point, the vendor deliver goods will send the invoice for goods, and when the goods delivered to our warehouse, then the forwarder will deliver the invoice for the delivery cost. So there is no sequence of the invoicing. Sometimes the goods are invoice earlier than the delivery cost, sometimes it is later.
My requirements are to make sure that the delivery cost is being posted to the asset account of the goods that are being delivered in the PO. I have tried these options:
a. Planned delivery cost inside the PO --> when posting invoice for planned delivery cost, got error message that there is no delivery cost in the PO. I think this is because of the multiple account assignment because when creating PO and inputting the delivery cost i do get warning that no delivery cost for multiple account assignment,
b. Unplanned delivery cost --> ONLY work if the invoice for delivery cost and goods are being posted as one document, which is not the case in here.
c. Separate PO for delivery cost --> got issue in which the person who supposed to create the PO for delivery cost, would not have any idea what asset no to be used (worse --> if the asset is being delivered partially).
Do you have any idea of what to be done in this case? Please help.
Best regards,
John.

See while making the invoice for the delivery cost you have selected the aggreation as planned delivery cost and in the PO you have not maintained the deilvery conditions .The pricing conditions which you have maintained must ebe have condition category - delivery cost .The system will not give thr message thhat you have not mainatined the delivery cost .If you have condition as mandatorty it will show that the conditions ( mandatory) are not maintain.In order to maintain the delivery cost you have to check your conditions whether they are delivery cost related conditins and if then maintain there values in PO and check while doing invoice you will get.
You have also the option of entering the delivery cost at time of the Invoice as unplanned delivery cost ...........
Just check your conditions which you have maintained the calculation schema as delivery conditions and maintain the values and do the invoice proceesing .
It is not advisableto cretae the sepearted PO for the delivety cost as it is not good way of doing the proceess.
Regards
sunny

Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

Dear Experts,
While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
In that purchase order we have given
multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A 50% cost center B 10% Cost Center C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
but
system is flagging message
Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
assignment
Message no. ME717
What will be the possible cause?
regards,
Abhijit

Hi,
In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
Regards,
satish

PO with new account assignment category to G/L without CO object

Hello all,
A customer in a company I work for asked me to create a new account assignment category (AAC) with G/L account as mandatory field and no CO object as mandatory.
He would like to create a PO with this AAC directly to balance-sheet account without any CO invloved (such as PO to stock) without a material.
I have bad feelings about this process but I do not have anything substantial to convince him against it.
Am I wrong ? Is this process allowed ? What "bad things" may happen if we use this process ?
Any help will be appreciated,
Thanks,
Isaac

Sir -
These stuffs are done by many indian companies to inject some bad accounts. If this is a requirement, no choices left.
It is possible to enter the material text and u can proceed with the things u need. You can create the value contract for this requirement.
Thanks,
Shiva

PO Creation with accrual account assignment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for