PO creation wrt PR - value not getting picked
Hi,
Purchase orders are created with respect to fully approved Purchase requistions (Release proc is set for PR) but net price is not getting copied to PO from PR.
Please let me know how to resolve it
Regards,
Uzair
If the info record (or contract) is not wanted, it is possible to "adopt" the price from the purchase requisition>
Are you getting the error - 'Net price must be greater than 0' - For PO creation from a requisiton for materials the system tries to determine the price from a source (info records, quota arrangement, contract etc). It is possible to use configuration to have the purchase requisition price adopted (and hence not use any info record) for this you must make the following configuration.
Material Management -> Purchasing -> Authorization management ->
Define Function Authorization for Buyers.
In here choose: "Function Authorizations: Purchase order"
In here you may specify a number of Function Authorization keys.
For each key, you may set rights for the key.
The field in question is "Order price adoption" (T160D-EBPUEB) which
must be ticked.
Then back out and now choose "Maintain Users".
In here choose tab "Parameters" and enter parameter ID "EFB" along
with the value equal to the key you just maintained.
(Remember to use Capitals when entering the key value)
In ME51N in the item detail screen, tab "Valuation", the field
"PO price" will now be visible and can be maintained via a dropdown.
The field will have following possible values:
- "Do not adopt"
- "As gross price" and
- "As net price"
If "do not adopt" is selected (and this is deafult ) then the system will look for an info record, contract etc when creating PO
If Other two options are selected the price from the PR will be adopted into the PO (info record will not be considered)
Similar Messages
-
Column value not getting picked up in formula
Hi,
I have changed the format of one of my Answers column to HTML and added the following link in the column formula:
'<a href=moirdev://e/Q/"- Quote Header"."Quote #"= ' ||"- Quote Header"."Quote #" || '>' || "- Quote Header"."Quote #" ||'</a> '
However, when i click on my column hyperlink, the part "- Quote Header"."Quote #" does not get replaced by the Quote #
What could be the problem?Hi Srini,
I tried the same
@[html]"<a href=moirdev://e/Q/"- Quote Header"."Quote #"">""- Quote Header"."Quote #""</a>"
but got the following error when trying to save my column formula:
[nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 27002] Near <@>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] . (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT "- Profile"."Sector Number", "- Profile".ROW_ID, "- Quote Header"."Active Flag", "- Quote Header"."Dealer Requestor First Name"||' '||"- Quote Header"."Dealer Requestor Last Name", "- Quote Header"."Effective Through", "- Quote Header"."Quote Opportunity Name", "- Quote Header".Result, "- Quote Header".Status, "- Quote Item Facts"."Quote Invoice Amt" / "- Quote Item Facts"."Quote Line $" * 100, "- Quote Item Facts"."Quoted $", '<a href=http://pit-ss-us3kbiu1/analytics/saw.dll?Go&Path=/shared/IRST%20Sales%20Mobile/Quote%20Order%20Detail&Action=Navigate&p0=1&p1=eq&p2=Detail."Source%20Quote%20Number"&p3=' ||replace("- Quote Header"."Quote #" ,' ','%20') || '>' || CAST("- Quote Item Facts"."Quote Invoice Amt" as CHAR)|| '</a>', @[html]"<a href=moirdev://e/Q/"- Quote Header"."Quote #"">""- Quote Header"."Quote #""</a>" FROM Pipeline
Any ideas? -
COPA Report Sales Actual value is not getting picked up
HI,
I have creted a COPA REPORT that is Plan vs Actual
all values are getting picked up in report except sales actual value .
could you give us some informatin regarding the same ?
In column actual sales i have selection characteristics 0 only
And my general data selection is Record Type is From A To I
Thanks
Nilesh RHI,
I have creted a COPA REPORT that is Plan vs Actual
all values are getting picked up in report except sales actual value .
could you give us some informatin regarding the same ?
In column actual sales i have selection characteristics 0 only
And my general data selection is Record Type is From A To I
Thanks
Nilesh R -
Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO
Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
SatishS0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you -
Index is not getting picked even after providing hint
Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 984 | 29686 (1)| 00:05:57 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26870 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26866 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24327 (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2539 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 26568 | 315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 24 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 25 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19258 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 28 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 32 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 848 | 26900 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26898 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26894 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24352 (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2542 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 22896 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 26 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 27 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19269 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 30 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 34 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GVriedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 50000 | 47M| 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 50000 | 47M| 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T_IX | 50000 | | 98 (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected. -
GL Account is not getting picked by billing document
Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
AshiHello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$ -
Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO
Hello Experts
I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
AnkitHello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1. Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
(ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2. Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3. Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4. Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5. Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6. Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7. Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8. Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit -
Force index not getting picked up while running the SQL Query
Hi All,
We are facing an issue with one SQL Query. We have created a custom Index and we are using that index in our query by using the following syntax:
/*+INDEX(ol XXEXH_ORDER_LINES_N2)*/
Where
ol – Table Alias Name
XXEXH_ORDER_LINES_N2 – Index Name
But still the index is not getting picked up in the Explain Plan.
If any one of you have faced a similar issue then please let us know how you had resolved it.
Appreciate your help.
DB version:10.2.0.4
Apps version: 11.5.10.2.0
Thanks.The query and plan are given as:
SELECT
/*+INDEX(ol XXEXH_ORDER_LINES_N2)*/
ol.header_id,
ol.line_id,
ol.line_type_id,
ol.flow_status_code,
ol.last_update_date,
ol.inventory_item_id,
ol.ship_from_org_id,
oh.order_number,
ttv.NAME,
msib.segment1,
msib.item_type,
fl.segment1 || '-' || fl.segment2 || '-' || fl.segment3 || '-' || fl.segment4 current_loc,
ship_to.country
|| '-'
|| NVL (ship_to.state, ship_to.province)
|| '-'
|| DECODE (ship_to.county,
NULL, ship_to.city,
ship_to.county
|| DECODE (ship_to.country,
NULL, NULL,
'-' || ship_to.city
) new_loc,
mmt.transaction_type_id,
mtt.transaction_type_name,
DECODE (mil.segment1,
UPPER ('Field%'), 'PLEASE VALIDATE FIELD LOCATION',
hou.country
|| '-'
|| DECODE (mil.segment1,
UPPER ('Field%'), NULL,
hou.region_2
|| '-'
|| DECODE (mil.segment1,
UPPER ('Field%'), NULL,
hou.region_1
|| '-'
|| DECODE (mil.segment1,
UPPER ('Field%'), NULL,
hou.town_or_city
) rma_loc,
ship_su.attribute1 oper_loc,
msib.organization_id --SC#5878
,fa.asset_number --SC#5878
,fdh.code_combination_id --SC#5878
,fa.asset_id parent_asset_id
FROM fnd_flex_values_vl ffvv,
fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs,
mtl_item_locations mil,
--hr_organization_units_v hou,
hr_organization_units o,
-- hr_lookups l,
-- hr_lookups l2,
hr_locations hou,
hr_locations_all_tl lot,
mtl_transaction_types mtt,
mtl_material_transactions mmt,
hz_locations ship_to,
hz_cust_acct_sites ship_cas,
hz_cust_site_uses ship_su,
hz_party_sites ship_ps,
fa_distribution_history fdh,
fa_locations fl,
fa_additions fa,
mtl_system_items_b msib,
oe_transaction_types_tl ttv,
oe_order_headers oh,
oe_order_lines ol
WHERE ol.org_id = TO_NUMBER (fnd_profile.VALUE ('ORG_ID')) --SC#5878
AND ol.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
AND TRUNC(ol.last_update_date) BETWEEN '01-SEP-2010' AND '31-OCT-2010'
AND ol.header_id = oh.header_id
AND ol.line_type_id = ttv.transaction_type_id
AND ol.inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
AND ol.ship_from_org_id = msib.organization_id
AND msib.item_type = 'REN'
AND SUBSTR(fa.asset_number,1,DECODE(INSTR(fa.asset_number,'-'),0,LENGTH(fa.asset_number),INSTR(fa.asset_number,'-')-1)) = msib.segment1 -- SC#11824 / added for fetching all assets with any suffix/ on 20-JUL-2011 by MPRAKAS
AND fdh.asset_id(+) = fa.asset_id
AND fdh.location_id = fl.location_id(+)
AND fdh.date_ineffective IS NULL
AND ol.ship_to_org_id = ship_su.site_use_id
AND ship_su.cust_acct_site_id = ship_cas.cust_acct_site_id
AND ship_cas.party_site_id = ship_ps.party_site_id
AND ship_ps.location_id = ship_to.location_id
AND mmt.inventory_item_id = ol.inventory_item_id --added new condition
AND mmt.organization_id = ol.ship_from_org_id --added new condition
AND mmt.trx_source_line_id = ol.line_id
AND mmt.transaction_quantity > 0
AND mmt.transaction_type_id = mtt.transaction_type_id(+)
AND mtt.transaction_type_name(+) = 'RMA Receipt'
AND o.organization_id(+) = mmt.organization_id
AND mil.inventory_location_id(+) = mmt.locator_id
AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'HCCA_AFF_LOCATION' --added new condition
AND ffvv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id(+)
AND ffvv.flex_value(+) = ship_su.attribute1
AND ttv.LANGUAGE = 'US'
AND (ol.ordered_item_id IS NULL OR ol.ordered_item_id > 0)
AND NVL (ol.ship_to_org_id, 1) > 0
AND NVL (hou.location_id, 1) > 0
AND o.location_id = hou.location_id(+)
AND NVL (hou.business_group_id, NVL (hr_general.get_business_group_id, -99)) = NVL (hr_general.get_business_group_id, -99)
AND hou.location_id = lot.location_id
AND lot.LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')
AND (fa.asset_id = fa.parent_asset_id OR fa.parent_asset_id IS NULL)
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 4,065 Bytes: 958 Cardinality: 2
125 CONCATENATION
62 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 3,140 Bytes: 479 Cardinality: 1
59 FILTER
58 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 3,139 Bytes: 441 Cardinality: 1
55 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3,131 Bytes: 420 Cardinality: 1
52 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 3,130 Bytes: 390 Cardinality: 1
49 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 3,128 Bytes: 377 Cardinality: 1
46 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3,127 Bytes: 351 Cardinality: 1
44 HASH JOIN Cost: 3,126 Bytes: 342 Cardinality: 1
42 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,443 Bytes: 324 Cardinality: 1
40 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,443 Bytes: 315 Cardinality: 1
38 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,443 Bytes: 306 Cardinality: 1
36 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,443 Bytes: 298 Cardinality: 1
33 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,442 Bytes: 268 Cardinality: 1
31 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,441 Bytes: 259 Cardinality: 1
28 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,438 Bytes: 238 Cardinality: 1
25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,437 Bytes: 207 Cardinality: 1
22 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,436 Bytes: 194 Cardinality: 1
19 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,435 Bytes: 184 Cardinality: 1
16 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,433 Bytes: 168 Cardinality: 1
13 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,432 Bytes: 154 Cardinality: 1
10 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,430 Bytes: 126 Cardinality: 1
7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,427 Bytes: 102 Cardinality: 1
4 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 779 Bytes: 34,028 Cardinality: 724
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
3 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL Cost: 777 Bytes: 13,756 Cardinality: 724
6 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 55 Cardinality: 1
5 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX ONT.OE_ORDER_LINES_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS Cost: 3 Bytes: 24 Cardinality: 1
8 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
15 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 14 Cardinality: 1
14 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
18 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
17 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
21 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTY_SITES Cost: 1 Bytes: 10 Cardinality: 1
20 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTY_SITES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
24 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 1 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
23 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
27 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL Cost: 1 Bytes: 31 Cardinality: 1
26 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES Cost: 3 Bytes: 21 Cardinality: 1
29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
32 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
35 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
34 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_LOCATIONS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
37 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
39 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
43 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE FA.FA_ADDITIONS_B Cost: 683 Bytes: 670,734 Cardinality: 37,263
45 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) FA.FA_ADDITIONS_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
48 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_TRANSACTION_TYPES Cost: 1 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
47 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_TRANSACTION_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
51 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_ITEM_LOCATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
50 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
54 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_LOCATIONS Cost: 1 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
53 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
57 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE FA.FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY Cost: 8 Bytes: 126 Cardinality: 6
56 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX FA.FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 6
61 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE FA.FA_LOCATIONS Cost: 1 Bytes: 38 Cardinality: 1
60 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) FA.FA_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
124 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 925 Bytes: 479 Cardinality: 1
121 FILTER
120 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 924 Bytes: 441 Cardinality: 1
117 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 916 Bytes: 420 Cardinality: 1
115 HASH JOIN Cost: 915 Bytes: 411 Cardinality: 1
113 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 231 Bytes: 393 Cardinality: 1
110 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 229 Bytes: 380 Cardinality: 1
107 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 228 Bytes: 354 Cardinality: 1
104 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 225 Bytes: 330 Cardinality: 1
102 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 224 Bytes: 321 Cardinality: 1
99 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 222 Bytes: 293 Cardinality: 1
96 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 221 Bytes: 263 Cardinality: 1
93 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 220 Bytes: 253 Cardinality: 1
90 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 218 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
87 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 217 Bytes: 223 Cardinality: 1
84 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 216 Bytes: 192 Cardinality: 1
81 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 210 Bytes: 137 Cardinality: 1
78 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 28 Bytes: 118 Cardinality: 1
75 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 22 Bytes: 97 Cardinality: 1
73 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 22 Bytes: 88 Cardinality: 1
71 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 22 Bytes: 79 Cardinality: 1
69 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 22 Bytes: 71 Cardinality: 1
66 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 19 Bytes: 58 Cardinality: 1
64 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
63 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
65 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL Cost: 17 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
68 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 3 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
67 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_FK3 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 5
70 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
72 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
74 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_LOCATIONS_ALL_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
77 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES Cost: 6 Bytes: 2,667 Cardinality: 127
76 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 127
80 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL Cost: 182 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
79 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX APPS.HCCA_HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL_N1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 489
83 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL Cost: 6 Bytes: 55 Cardinality: 1
82 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX ONT.OE_ORDER_LINES_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 4
86 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL Cost: 1 Bytes: 31 Cardinality: 1
85 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
89 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 14 Cardinality: 1
88 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
92 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
91 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
95 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTY_SITES Cost: 1 Bytes: 10 Cardinality: 1
94 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTY_SITES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
98 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_LOCATIONS Cost: 1 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
97 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
101 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
100 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
103 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
106 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS Cost: 3 Bytes: 24 Cardinality: 1
105 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
109 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_TRANSACTION_TYPES Cost: 1 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
108 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_TRANSACTION_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
112 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_ITEM_LOCATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
111 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
114 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE FA.FA_ADDITIONS_B Cost: 683 Bytes: 670,734 Cardinality: 37,263
116 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) FA.FA_ADDITIONS_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
119 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE FA.FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY Cost: 8 Bytes: 126 Cardinality: 6
118 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX FA.FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 6
123 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE FA.FA_LOCATIONS Cost: 1 Bytes: 38 Cardinality: 1
122 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) FA.FA_LOCATIONS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1 -
GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up
If we have creating a PO without checking "GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up, due to this we are not able to create MIRO document with Excise duty value.
We are using Tax calculation procedure TAXINN.
Regards,
Rama MohanHi,
Check in the following path :
Material Management > Purchase Order > Define screen layout at document level
Choose ME21N for details and check by double clicking the GR/IR control whether GR based invoice verification
is an optional entry.
Regards,
Sadashivan -
EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination
HI .. all,
We have transferred Sales order from ECC to GTS. But during prreferrence determination, EXW price of the Sales order is not getting picked up.
Please suggest if any configuration is missing .
Thnks in Advance .Hi Sapcongts,
Of course you should not modify standard SAP code, and I will not help you to do that.
I don't agree with your idea of proposed and actual EXW values. The Sales Order is your way of recording the customer's Purchase Order, and the price should be fixed at that point. The billing process should not change the agreed price of the goods - only perhaps re-calculate taxes and any other charges that could not be confirmed at the time of order.
If your standard prices are offered as FOB, then I can understand your needing to subtract some components to reach the EXW price, but in that case you will have problems transferring the correct amount to GTS. As I mentioned earlier, you can manipulate the data in the BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0A_R3, but I had not looked closely enough at this specific requirement. Unfortunately the pricing table KONV is not provided in the BAdI and that data will not yet be available in the database. Provided the elements to be subtracted are to be read from Master Data, then you could make that same subtraction again in the BAdI. But if there are complex dependencies, it might not be easy.
Having looked in more detail at the code, I think you would be reasonably entitled to complain to SAP about missing functionality here. In the ERP system, the SD pricing provides a specific sub-total (KOMP-PREVA: subtotal 8) for Preference Value, and you can easily configure that to be filled after your subtractions. But that subtotal is not used in the GTS mapping, and I think that's a mistake. You might want to create an OSS message about it, requesting that the GTS Preference value be taken from the sub-total that was clearly designed exactly for that purpose.
In any case, good luck with the project.
Regards,
Dave -
Billing pricing not getting picked up
I created a sales invoice with reference a sales order. In the sales order the price was getting picked up and was displayed.
Delivery was also created. But when the invoice was created and saved the net value is shown as 0. Price is not getting picked up.
The option which many other consultants has given was to cancel the invoice and re create a new invoice. But we want the price to be picked in the same invoice.
This happened only for 5 invoices which was created on a particular day. These 5 inovices show a net value of 0.
Could you please help me out to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.Hi,
Please check if the document pricing procedure is same for Order type and billing type.
If its not same please check what is the pricing procedure system taking for Billing document procedure.
In that pricing procedure check what is the Base price condition type.
Check whether condition records maintained for that condition type.
Iff no records maintain then use VK11 to create new condition records.
Then go to Item data - Conditions in billing document press Update button and use B-Carry out new pricing.
Revert if you need more elaborate explanation.
Best Regards, -
WT not getting picked up under 3PR
Hi All
We are facing an issue wherein the wage type is not getting picked up in 3PR even though it is coming under remuneration statement.
Can you please advise what could be the reason ?
Regards
NehaAs far i understand system will always considers the retro values when ever any changes are there pertaining to wage type accordingly system will do the posting.
Either it is a positive arrear or negative arrear system will bring it to the current period you do not want retro calculation delimit the record maintain 78 with effective date on wards.
Regards
Venkatesh -
Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES
Dear Experts,
I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
Thanks and Regards
MansihHi,
Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
Regards,
Biju K -
Z implementation not getting picked for BADI - MB_DOCUMENT_BADI
Hi,
I have a done a z implemenatation for standard badi MB_DOCUMENT_BADI in ECC6.In Tcode MIIGO after giving 2 line items when i save it that Zimplemen is not getting picked.
In 4.6c the same Z implementation is getting picked.
can you please help me out in this.Hi Rajeev,
I am not sure about the definition of Badi and hence am assuming that the filter is set....and the value for the z implementation does not match the value passed from the call point. Can you please check this and confirm
Regards,
Jemin -
VALUES NOT GETTING ADDED IN JAVA DICTIONARY
HIII ,
AM DOING AN APPLICATION IN WHICH I AM TRYING TO INSERT VALUES IN A TABLE(CREATED THRU JAVA DICTIONARY), USING EJBS(ENTITY BEAN AND SESSION BEAN) AND COMMAND BEAN..AND WEBDYNPRO....
AFTER DEPLOYMENT EVRYTHNG IS RUNNING FINE BUT VALUES NOT GETTING ADDED IN THE TABLE...
THE CODE FOR THE "ADD" BUTTON IS :
wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().modelObject().add(wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().getEmpno(),wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().getEmpname());
THE CODE FOR ADD function IN COMMANDBEAN IS
public void add(String empno,String empname){
try {
local.createdata(empno,empname);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();}
PLZZ DO HELP OUT!!!The message in simple English just means that "You are doing something really bad" !!! It is absolutely not the communication problem, but understanding problem.
Though you may be executing the same function using SE37 or in the webshop application through JCo, the runtime context is different and without knowing what exactly your Z rfc is doing, it is very difficult to help. To start with, the userid - that is who is running the RFC is different in both situations. In SE37, it is the logon user and in the web, depending upon whether the connection is stateless or stateful, it could be the anonymous ICSS user or the logged in user. Here again, if you have used UME, it is the user id and if you have used ALIAS user, then it is the alias user id. This is just an example. Your runtime context can be different due to many other reasons too.
So, to make this simpler - what is that you are trying to do?
BTW, try not to create multiple threads for the same issue..
Maybe you are looking for
-
Weird iCal bug after 10.4.8 update
After updating to Mac OS X 10.4.8 I get the following display bug with my iCal reminders, i.e. the reminder appears way off to the side of the screen. This happens on both of my machines: http://web.mac.com/csearles/iWeb/Site%202/Photos%202.html G 4
-
I am trying to write a program that needs to connect to an Oracle database on a different machine but I cannot even get my test app to compile. I know that I need a jdbc driver. I downloaded ojdbc6.jar from the Oracle site. I know that it needs to be
-
Error in determining country specific length for account number
Cannot determine country-specific length for account number;No instance of object type AccountClosureAM has been created. External reference: 0271409168GTABNGODUMMY00USDGO
-
Does the Photoshop CC single license include Bridge and ACR? I couldn't find an answer anywhere on Adobe's site.
-
Hi All, Its possible to grant a select privileges to table in perticular row???. senthil kumar