PO EDI Problem

Hi,
I want to save the file to my local machine when the output is issued. I want to use EDI.
Please help me in configuration.
I have configured the partner profile in WE20. I have created the File Port and specified the directory path as d drive.
I am not able to create the RFC connection in SM69 usint TCP/IP : connection type T.
Can anyone help me out?
point will be rewarded for help.
Thanks in advance.

Experts please help..

Similar Messages

URGENT : EDI problem

Hi All,
I previously posted a thread on "EDI Rejected", but there were no responces. So, i would like to explain it further in detail.
There was a PO created and GR was posted. Now there is a problem in EDI which got rejected for " Invalid Freight charges for the PO number ############ " . Now, the vendor wants to add freight charges to the PO which will come up in the invoice.
Normally, we do not pay freight charges, unless it is a drop ship, or an emergency expedited order. Now, the situation is drop shipped and we r responsible for the freight .
As far as i know we can add freight charges ONLY while creating PO.
Is there is any solution (ASAP) for this to get cleared so that the freight charges will be paid.
Thanks,
Sameer

You already have posted the GR, so you cannot change the conditions in the purchase order.
What you can do is cancel the GR, change your condition schema, adding a manual freight condition, and maintain this condition manually in your PO.
Once you have your condition maintained, you can post GR, and freight provision will be posted.
Hope this helps,
GS

EDI problem with ABRVW field

Hi,
please excuse me if my question is silly but I really need help. I am receiving EDI errors in my supplier's AVIEXPs because the field ABRVW in the iDOCs he sends for one particular reference has the value "X" instead of "E". My supplier is unable to fix the problem, they say they are unable to locate the ABRVW field. I am a basic user of SAP so I cannot help them. Where can my supplier find the ABRVW field, and what must they do to change its vaue?
Thanks in advance for your help!

You are probably correct... but there is no harm in checking.. Check with your middle ware and find out if they are doing any mapping for this field in the IDOC (Usage indicator)... If they are using values AS-IS, then your supplier is probably not having the correct reference...
If your supplier is also using SAP, this field ABRVW is part of Customer master, VBAK, VBAP and so on... Most like they are not maintaining correct value for ABRVW in their Customer master or Sales order.

Inbound edi problem

hi ,
i have problem with inbound EDI for po acknowledgment(855) ,message type used ordrsp process code ORDR and basic type is orders05. i am testing the idoc in we19.for the segment E1EDP19 i specified qualifier 001 (means Material number used by customer) and IDTNR (marterial no) matnr in PO it runs successfully and idoc is posted to application.but if i specify qualifier- 002 (means Material number used by vendor ) it is not working and idoc is not posting to application with message Material number differs from that of ordered material. I have even assign value IDTNR (material no) from material info record i.e. vendor material no from table EINA but still idoc is not posting to application. Can anyone spot why this error occurs and give the solution.Is there any other table which maintains vendor material no. is there any OSS note available for this error?
Relevant points will be awarded for the solution.

This might be due to the material inventory being locked if these idocs contain the same material. The ideal would be to process these sequentially. if its process immediately in WE20, then multipe idocs can get processed simultaneously and ending in error if all are using the same material.

EDI Problem: no visual components

Sometimes when I move my project from a machine to another, I have no visual components but just <f:form> etc instead of viewing the components wich is really a problem for me. If I move Jdeveloper directory with my project files I have no problems.
Any idea would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Bertrand

Anybody has any idea? You have a loop somewhere in your program so the GUI never get a chance to repaint itself.
This is first time I'm using JComponent for painting and I guess this might be a problem. Here is a simple example that works:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=57&threadID=594537

Trigger EDI

Hi all,
I am currently troubleshooting a EDI problem whereby after the GI created from Delivery, the IDoc outbound will get triggered to generate XML file.
May I know where did the triggering part set? Is it config side SPRO? If it's in SD Billing, I just need to define a new output and the IDoc will be triggered, but how about this Good Issue? Is it output determination also? can let me know the step to check the setting for output in GI (or Good movement).
Thanks so much~
Cheers
CSWONG

Hi sir,
I can find the function module. But my question now is, how did the EDI get triggered when doing Goods Issue?
Now I give you an example on SD-Billing, in Billing, what you need to do is add an output which is EDI related, then it will trigger the IDoc. So how about GI? I don't see any output at the MB02.
Thanks.

Problem with CRLF in a EDI file....

Hello,
I receive from my client a EDI file with a charcater in the end of the file, for this, the map generate the error Length limit exceeded - no SEG. delim. found!!!, but if I set "on" in the ingnoreCRLF option on the BICMD of Seebubrger, the map works correctly, I try too with the instruction setIgnoreCRLF("on") in the last segment of the EDI and this works too fine.
But when I deploy the mappings_user.sda with this changes to XI and I receive the file in the BIC Module, the map doesn´t work, generate the same error to the character on the file.
Can comebody help me please with an idea about this problem??.
Greetings,
Hervey

Check the case of the file names such as map.jhm File names are not case sensitive when in a jar file.

Problem with Date in EDI posting

PO created and updated by the EDI 945 from mexico SAP system. Once the EDI is sent,it changes the arrival date of the PO to the ship date. An example is STO 506613882. When created this PO, it had a delivery date of 02-01-08. It was updated by the system to reflect a date of 01-26-08. This creating problem because the receiving sites are on ATP. Any got any idea of Resolving this issue.
Thank you,
Raj

Hi,
How did you create this PO? Was it automatic or manual?
Whatever, if there was no manual intervention in all the process, then you need to check the Inbound Idoc that has created or updated the PO.
Go to the control Record of the Idoc concerned and take the Sender Partner of the Idoc.
Now check the Partner Profile on [WE20]>Inbound Parameters> select the message type (ORDERS for e.g) and then click on details Icon. You can see the Process Code double clicking on which you get the "Function Module" which is responsible for the Integration of this Idoc into SAP.
Now go thru this Func Mod and search for the required field i.e Ship Date filed for example (find-->gloabl search). You can see in the program how the field is mapped to Idoc segment and how it is getting updated.
Hope it helps!!!
Bunni

Context Mapping Problem from IDoc to EDI

Hi,
I'm trying to map an IDoc to an EDI and I get this problem.
In my IDoc, I have segment E1ADRM1 (1:N)
My mapping condition is if E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = OSP then copy E1ADRM-REGION into x (EDI field)
So here is my problem:
In my IDoc test, the segment E1ADRM1 is repeated 6 times and the field REGION is not populated in all iterations so the wrong
REGION is being copied to my EDI field.
If I do a display queue on E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q, the value OSP is at the 5th position
AG
SP
VE
WE
OSP ***
OSO
If I do a display queue on E1ADRM-REGION, since only 5 segment E1ADRM have the field REGION populated, I get
KS
VA
KS
ON
VA
**(E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = SP do not have the RIGION populated so not showing in the IDoc)
So now, since E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = OSP is at the 5th position, it is copying the 5th E1ADRM-REGION from the list but it should be the 4th.
How can I do that?
Rgds,
Yves

Hi,
For the mapping to work as you are expecting the queue should look like this(CC denotes context change)..
KS
CC
CC
VA
CC
KS
CC
ON
CC
VA
If you are not having the context changes, check at what level is field REGION at, right click on REGION in graphical mapping and choose menu item context, the 1st entry should have the tick mark(same should be for the PARTNER_Q field also).
Thanks,
Renjith.

EDI file Mapping.. problem with UNT segment..!!

Hi all,
Anyone who worked on EDI files, pls help me..
Doing Idoc to EDI scenario..
I done for all the mapping for all the fields except for the UNT segment and field D_0074
Here i need to provide no of segments in the EDI file...
like
*UNBUNOA:393777:ZZ93139:ZZ080108:09080+++1'
UNH0000016334368DESADV:D:01B:UN:EAN007'
BGM3510094147783+9'
DTM+137:200801080934:203'
DTM+11:200801080934:203'
DTM+17:200801100000:203'
ALI++168165'
RFF+ON:R-08007E'
DTM+171:20080107:102'
NADSU377996::92'
NADST9418GR::92'
CPS1+5'
PAC9+09::9'
MEAPDAAA+KGM:6306.628'
MEACTNPP+NAR:9'
CPS21+3'
PAC109::9F:CHEP'
MEAPDAAA+KGM:256.828'
PCI+33E'
GINAW393100471000832922'
LIN1+19310047208023:SRV'
QTY+12:44'
DTM+36:20090505:102'
CNT+2:2'
UNT240000016334368'
If you observe the above file which is my resultant file.. I need to count all the segments above UNT and pass the value( here total segments are 24) to D_0074 field .
Is it any way we can count all the segments.. and pass the value??
Kindly suggest me ..
waiting for your replys..
Regards
Seema.

Problem here is ..
They have created only SCv Seebutger_EDI_Adpater
but they haven't created for Seebutger_GENERIC_EDI ..
all those mappings will be under Seebutger_GENERIC_EDI .. which they haven;t installed..
thats the problem..
If any one has that UDF .. kindly let me know..
-Seema.

INVOIC96a to EDI-XML by Conversion Agent fails, Special Character Problem

Hi,
with your help in another thread, I recognized that the EDIFACT INVIOC96a Parser of the Itemfield Conversion Agent has a Problem with special characters.
So like described in this blog SAP XI supports EDIFACT i created a Library Project and tried to test the conversion.
It is only working when no special characters are in the EDI file. If there a special characters insight the file, conversion agent say's no error, but the xml file is corrupted. In fact you can't display it in IE or by opening it with XMLPad it says "Not well formed".
Hope that someone has an idea for this problem
Thank you
regards

Hi,
I have already faced the same problem when using Itemfield Conversion Agent.
I solved the same with change properties of the project.
In conversion agent project :
opne the menu : Project --> Properties --> Encoding --> Change the output Encoding Schema (None).
use None in that schema in place of XML.
Your problem can be solved.
Regards,
Sandeep Kaushik

IDOC DELVRY05 TO EDI 856 - Mapping problem

Hi all,
i'm currently working on a outbound mapping with the delivery idoc (DELVRY05) and the EDI 856 (Advance Shipping Notice Definition)
The problem is that i can't map the items for every pack in the structure because the ocurrency doesn't match.
The EDI 856 has a segment called G_SHL (ocurrence 0.200000), that i replicated 4 times for shipping, order, pack and item data
And this segment has a subsegment called G_SHL/S_HL (ocurrence 0.1)
RESULT DESIRED GIVEN BY THE CLIENT: (1 pack/1item)
3 HL1*S~ ======> S: shipping, 1 hierarchy)
4 TD1CTN251***G223.997*LB~
5 TD5*2ABFSM*CC~
6 REFBM003030987~
7 REFCN086044619~
8 DTM01120080128*180610~
9 DTM06720080204~
10 FOB*PP~
11 N1SFStiefel Labs~
12 N4DULUTHGA*30096~
13 HL21*O~ ======> O: order, 2 hierarchy, 1 was the previous hierarchy)
14 PRF*4064561~
15 HL32*P~ ======> P : Pack, 3 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
16 MANGM00000734620052976193~
17 HL43*I~ ======> I: Item , 4 hierchay, 3 was the previous hierarchy
31 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
32 SN1*12EA~
33 DTM03620090930~
34 HL52*P~ ======> P : Pack, 5 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
35 MANGM00000734620052975189~
36 HL65*I~ ======> I: Item , 6 hierchay, 5 was the previous hierarchy
37 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
38 SN1*12EA~
39 DTM03620090930~
40 HL72*P~ ======> P : Pack,7 hierarchy, 2 was the previous hierarchy
41 MANGM00000734620052975196~
42 HL87*I~ ======> I: Item , 8 hierarchay, 7 was the previous hierarchy
43 LIN*UP073462150651LT45X5147ND00145150605~
44 SN1*12EA~
45 DTM03620090930~
46 CTT*8~
47 SE479220014~
As u see, all packs belong to "2 hierarchy" (order), and items to their correposding pack
(has a comment, the "hierarchy number" is always given by a counter so u won't find the exact number again)
so, the client wants us to create an structure that is like this..
1º Pack
1º item
2º item
2º Pack
1º item
2º item
(the example has only one item, but they say that is going to be with many items)
- The problem is that the structure data of the Idoc doesnt match EDI 856 structure
E1EDL37 (0.99999) -
Pack data -
G_SHL (0.200000)
E1EDL37/E1EDL44 (0.99999) -
Item data -
G_SHL/HL (0.1) <====
i was doing different G_SHL for pack and items but that leaves me with a wrong structure, and with all the hierarchy data wrong for items (since the mapping can't see which item belong to his pack)
1º Pack
2º Pack
3º Pack
1º Item
2º Item
3º Item
- How can i map the structure Pack/item if in the idoc got too many item positions for only one EDI corresponding segment??
Thanks in advance!

Alains,
We have the same tear, pack and item problem with one of our customer in one of my project. To acheive this result with the standard schema is not possible because this is a custom one.
So I would suggest to change the schema in BIC like the occurrence and within the third G_SHL you should have S_HL and within this you should have a S_HL so that for every pack you will have multipe items.
The bottom line is to have the schema as required by your mapping. Once you change the schema deploy the maps in J2EE and use them else it will throw an error in RWB.
Regards,
---Satish

Problem with mapping [Idoc to EDI]

Hi experts,
i am facing a new problem in my mapping (idoc to edi scenario)
my target is as follow:
InvoiceDME
>Invoice 1..1
>>InvoiceHeader 1..1
>>>IncotermsCode 1..1
My Idoc is as follow:
IDOC
>E1EDK17 0..20
>>QUALF
>>LKOND
>>LKTEXT
There can be 2 scenarios in my source:
1st:
IDOC
>E1EDK17
>>QUALF = 001
>>LKOND = lkond001
>>LKTEXT
2nd:
IDOC
>E1EDK17
>>QUALF = 001
>>LKOND = lkond001
>>LKTEXT
>E1EDK17
>>QUALF = 002
>>LKOND = lkond002
>>LKTEXT = lktext002
If QUALF=002 then I have to take both values of LKOND and LKTEXT and map them to incotermcode
else if qualf=001 alone, then map LKOND to incotermcode
my mapping is as follow:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30317046@N05/2862446903/
as you can see, the problem is if i am in my second scenario, i get the wrong value in incotercode (lkond001 instead of the concatenate of LKOND and LKTEXT for QUALF = 002)
Do you have any idea how I can solve this??
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Jamal

Actually i used java mapping:
 //write your code here
try
 String returnString = "";
 for (int i = 0; i < QUALF.length; i++)
 if (("002".equals(QUALF.trim())))
 returnString = returnString +" "+ LKOND +" "+ LKTEXT;
 result.addValue(returnString);
catch(Exception e)
 e.printStackTrace();
and the condition on the 'count' of QUALF (if = 2 then else)
Thanks,
Regards,
Jamal

IDoc to EDI mapping problem (Invoic01 to 810 v4010)

Hi,
I have a problem with my invoice mapping.
I need to exclude children parts from the outbound EDI invoice.
In my mapping I was able to control the number of lines that should go out from the top line item node level using:
G_SIT1 -> If E1EDP02-QUALF = 002 then E1EDP02-ZEILE->Remove Context->SplitByValue->CollapseContext->G_STI1
I have the right amount of lines but the fields under G_STI1 are wrong since I'm missing the last ones.
Then I tried different combinations + playing with the contexts and played again with the top node and my conclusion is that it might be easier to exclude them in IDoc in SAP using an UserExit?!?
Anybody was able to get around this problem without changing the IDoc in R/3?

Can I filter on a partner type KU? I need to customize an outboud invoice to not send some segments.
Or is it only for type LS?
Rgds,
Yves

Facing Problem in IDOC to EDI FLAT File Scenario

Hi,
I am working on a scenario IDOC to EDI FLAT File. For this I have used ABAP mapping.
The problem i am facing is that the EDI FILE contains the segment name as E1EDK01 for eg. while I need the name as per the latest segment definiton released. I have also tried this using File port and it gives the required segment names in file. But we dont have to use File ports. Please suggest me if something is missing in PI Abap stack ?? Why I am not getting the segments name as per latest segment definition mainatined in R3.
Thanks
Neha

Hi Neha,
Please check the segment name in sxmb_moni. Is this showing new value or the old value?
If SXMB_MONI shows old value then the source SAP (R/3) system which is sending the idoc may not have released the segment after changing the name. You need to ensure that the idoc segment has been released properly. Then re-import the iodc into PI server again. Finally delete entry of the iodc structure in idx2 transaction, no need to re-import the idoc structute again in idx2, since once you run the scenario the metadata automatically gets imported.
regards
Anupam

PO EDI Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for