PO / GR Qty into COPA

Hi all,
Is there any way in which we can include the PO / GR qty into COPA whether as a characteristic?
The purpose is to be able to divide the "value of price difference as the result of PO" with the qty bought (thus, i am thinking GR).
I tried checking the "possible entries", and i don't think that MARA table could work
Thank you very much for your help
Regards, Erwin

Hi AJay,
At first i thought it should be value field, because it only makes sense
But when i was trying to create a new value field, there was no table that can be derived from, so i was thinking it might be a characteristic, and hence my previous post.
I am sorry, but i am glad you point out my mistake.
I will try that as soon as i can, and get back to you with the result
Thank you very much
Regards, Erwin

Similar Messages

Split Valuation Material Cost Estimate into COPA

Hi all,
Is there any way how we can transfer the split valuation material cost estimate into COPA?
I checked the actual line items, there is no "valuation type / batch" characteristics there.
Is this the main cause?
Please kindly suggest on the best way to solve this issue
Thank you very much
Regards, Erwin

Hi, Ajay
Does this mean that, even though i manage to create the valuation type as characteristic in COPA, i won't be able to get 2 different cost estimate based on valuation type into COPA?
Hm, then, are there any solutions which can be done to solve this issue?
The client needs a COPA report which can show the breakdown of the sold materials cost estimates
As usual, thank you very much for your help
Regards, Erwin

Revenue values are not flowing into COPA

Dear Experts,
We are processing the MTS normal scenario. Here the revenue values are not flowing into COPA when FG sale. But when we process the Raw material Sale values are flowing to COPA smoothly. Here the SD condition Type, Revenue Account and COPA value Field same for RM and FG.
May I know the exact reasonu2026.
Please suggest me in right wayu2026.
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle.

Hi Balaji bhau
I guess the issue might be with your Item Category in SD.. Is it set relevant for billing??
See if the Billing Type has been entered in KE4W and the VF reset for it
Check in VFX3 if the invoice is lying there for any error.... Try to release the Billing to accounting and you may get the error message
br, Ajay M

COPA - SD Condition Type value flow into COPA - Sign

Dear Experts,
We have a scenario where an SD condition type has been created which permits both positive & negative. However, the value goes into COPA only as Positive.
In KE4i we enabled the check box Transfer +/-, however the values doesn't flow correctly in COPA.
There is no issue with FI.
Example:
Condition Type
ZREB Discount - 3000
ZHKP Rebate on Disc - (1000)
Net is 2000, however in COPA it is updated as 4000. Both the above condition types are mapped to same GL and Value field.
Any inputs will really help.
regards
Diwakar

Dear Sarada,
I read the notes but still have a question -
In my case the sales order is type ZXX3 (return w/o reference). The customer makes order of the said type via VA01, then creates outbound delivery via VL01N, then releases billing block via VA02 and finally creates billing document via VF01.
In VA01 there are two condition types ZXX7(discount) - Rs 200 & ZXX8(discount margin) - Rs. 100 appearing with a negative sign in condition value. When the customer makes the billing document via VF01he manually enters one more condition type ZXX9 (extra discount / surcharge) + Rs. 50 ..for this scenario its sort of discount received back / surcharge). Hence in the billing document the above two conditions ZXX7 & ZXX8 are deducted and ZXX9 is added.(-200-100+50 = -250)
Presently in KE24 for this billing document the discounts appear as - xxx (discount) -xxx (discount margin & -xxx (surcharge)... The issue here is surcharge though positive is getting added up and only one consolidated figure is coming (-350)
I checked the transfer +/- checkbox in KE4I for ZXX7 & ZXX8 and then rechecked. The netting is being done but the negative sign does not appear now which is wierd. (250)
Can you let me know whether the values appearing in COPA after changing the setting are correct or not. I use ECC6
Thanks

Problem in converty given qty into kgs using variable

hello,
i have taken 0ORDER_QUAN with 0PO_UNIT.
AND 0CML_OR_QTY (confirmed order quantity) with unit 0SALES_UNIT.
I want two more fields in the query with order quantity in kgs and confirmed order quanity in kgs.
the formula for order qty in kgs is written as:
NODIM(NOERR(0ORDER_QUANT * NET WHT) where net wht is the formula varaible of process type replacement path,
similarly for the confirmed order qty in kgs.
but when we execute the query the both the quantity columns in kgs is showing no values.
is there a problem in the formula variable.
and one more thing, in the cube 0order_quan is loaded and its unit column 0PO_UNIT is not loaded and it is blank since it is not mapped to the field in the transfer rule to the source system field.
should we load data to the unit field so that we can convert order qty into kgs.
plz suggest me.

Soujanya,
Things you might want to do first...
1. Check if NET WHT is being populated properly... put it directly into the query and check
2. Put all components of the formula into the query and check if they are all displayed.
3. Now about the unit issue , since you have used NODIM, I do not think this should be a problem.
And personally I would side with AVR on the issue of having the same in the routines rather than directly in the query.
Arun
Assigning points is a way of saying thank you in SDN

Trading goods MM Conditions into COPA ( Condition wise)

Dear Experts,
Any possibility is there to get the MM Pricing conditions into COPA like SD Conditions with out activating IS Retail Module.
Any alternative method or MM condition Types into COPA.
Regards,
Goda

Hi,
Yes, it is possible to post values into Value fields of PA by assigning the MM Conditions in KE4IM like what we do for SD conditions in KE4I.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Ship-to information into COPA

Hi Experts,
I am new to COPA processing. We have costing based COPA datasource based on some chars and values. Now, I am required to add ship-to field into COPA. Can you suggest me the best way to achieve this?
I have checked KEA0 Tx, ship-to field is not available in standard fields.
Thanks,
Purvang

Since Ship-To Party is a predefined characteristic it can be added by simply selecting it from The "Transferfrom" table to Data Structure column.
1. KEA0, Enter the Operating Concern and click the Change/display( Icon with a Pen & Glasses) in order to switch from display mode to change mode.
2. Click on the Change button with an blue arrow
3. Look for Ship-To-Party Field in the "transfer from" column ( Ship-To Party Field name is KUNWE)
4. After transfering it to Data Structure column, select it and click activation icon - It must be activated otherwise..
5. When propmted to generate the operating concern environment? Yes
The status must be green.
Cheers

Batches Nrs. into COPA

Hiya gurus!
I am working with this client who has COPA installed and now they are implementing BI.
One of the users came to me with the query if the "Batches Nrs." allocated in the Billing Documents (VF03) can be brought into COPA so, then they can be displayed afterwards in BI.
Now, as i understand the Batch Nr. field is a table lookup and cannot be created as a Characteristic eventually in COPA.
I would like to confirm that there isn't other way from COPA side to fix this.
Or if there is a way to do it from BI directly probably...
Thanks and Regards,
fb.

flower82 wrote:>
> 1- What does mean that the Profitability Segment number will be redetermined in the billing document?
In the sales order you will most of the times not have already entered the batch you intend to sell. So when the profitability segment is already determined at the point in time when the sales order is entered, the batch number will not be taken into account for the profitability segment.. Beter for your requirement ist it if the profitability segment is again redertemined when the billing document is created. Then the batch number should normalle by known and can be taken into account.
> 2- Why in the example to find the routine nr. it shows you the routine for copying control of Delivery Docs. to Billing Docs., shouldn't be the case from Sales Order to Billing Document, if the Batch nr. is defined at a Sales Order level?
I don't see that. But: The usual case will be that the delivery document contains batch and valuation type, the sales order not always. Therefore this copy might be safer.
> 3- This client i work for transfers the Billing Docs to COPA, no Sales Order are moved to COPA. So, i am not 100% understanding if this SAP note applies then?!
Sure, that is the case described here. Technically a lot of the sales order info are handed over to CO-PA during the billing time as well.
> 4- They don't have account based or transfer from Sales Order, is this SAP note still applicable to this?
If they don't have account-based one of the reasons for problems is not relevant.
It might be that you don't need the procedure of the note because the batch is already transferred to CO-PA in your customer example. You just have to define the batch as a characteristic and use it in reporting. Thereis a good chance that it works ut of the box. That was the case when I tried with the valution type.
best regards,
Udo

Post directly into COPA W/O FI update

Hi All
Some disounts are posted into FI without getting posted into COPA in previous periods. Now I want to post those discounts directly into COPA with out updating FI. Is there any transaction to do that?
Thanks in advance

Try TOCDE KE21N.
Enter the characteristics and value fields. Before that select the record type as B.
It works for me. This populates value only in COPA.
Regds
Abu

Assess into COPA

Hi Friends,
Could you enlighten me, how is cost center allocation to CO-PA done?
Does it mean that Sender is Cost center and Receiver should set to P&L Line?
I am trying to understand what happens when "cost center is assessed into CO-PA".
Please advise.
Best clear answer is guaranteed Full points.
Regards
Markus

Hi,
To add to the previous reply, you need to do the following:
1)     Define Assessment cycles with Cost Centre as the Sender & profitability segment as the Receiver.
2)     You need to define Allocation Structures and select this in each segment of the Assessment cycle. This maps the primary cost elements to the Secondary Assessment cost elements.
3)     You need to define PA Transfer structures which maps the primary Cost Elements to COPA Value fields.
4)     If you are using variable values as basis of Allocation then you need to use an appropriate Value field as a Tracing factor for e.g. Gross Sales, Net Sales, Cost of Goods Sold, etc.
however, to avoid system performance issues, please note that If the number of characteristics are too many better alternative is to assess the costs from the Cost Centre to combination of high level characteristics i.e. Sales Org, Distr Channel, Division, etc as there are and then use Top Down Distribution (KE28) in COPA to assess costs to lower level Characteristics i.e. Customer, product, Brand, etc.
assign points if useful.
regards,

How can I create ACCT_BUDAT into COPA account based data source?

hi Friends,
I create a COPA data source use standard BI function: KEB0 and find that the posting data(ACCT_BUDAT ) can not include into it.
I checked the table CE4xxxx_acct and find that it has already in it, however when I check tcode KEQ3 I found that this field is not in the list.
So can anybody tell me the reason and advice? the posting data is important for the report. Also if possible, may I include the COPA document number into the COPA account based datasource?
thanks very much!

Hi,
   The posting date BUDAT is not a characteristic ; its just a technical field.
   There is a logical reason for this
The CE4XXXX table basically holds a unique PA segment no for a unique combination of characteristics. For example let us say you have only 2 characteristics customer and product. Then let us say for customer 1 and product 1 you have PA no 1; for customer 2 and product 2 PA no 2 and so on. Every time you post a document with customer 1 and product 1 the same PA no 1 will be reused i.e. no new entry will be made to CE4XXXX.
   Now if you were to introduce a new characteristic called date in this table then every time the date changes a new PA no will have to be generated and the entries in CE4 table will grow. This will make reporting more difficult and will also cause performance problems.
regards
Waman

Denominator (Divisor) for Conversion of Sales Qty into SKU

Dear Friends,
In our scenario system is converting Confirmed quanity (for ex 57.4 Hrs) (Schedule lines--->Sales--->Confirmed quantity) into Required Quantiy( 0.080 MMN) (Schedule lines--->Sales--->Quantities--->Required Quanity) as per the conversion( i.e 720 hrs equals to 1 MMN) maintained.
Now we want to change this conversion from 720 to 160 hrs. But we are not able to locate the source from where this value is being picked up. I have checked in Material Master Data--->Additional Data--->Units of Measure. There is no maintainance for Hrs to MMN conversion.
Please suggest.
with regards,
S.Dayanand

Dear Friends,
In our scenario system is converting Confirmed quanity (for ex 57.4 Hrs) (Schedule lines--->Sales--->Confirmed quantity) into Required Quantiy( 0.080 MMN) (Schedule lines--->Sales--->Quantities--->Required Quanity) as per the conversion( i.e 720 hrs equals to 1 MMN) maintained.
Now we want to change this conversion from 720 to 160 hrs. But we are not able to locate the source from where this value is being picked up. I have checked in Material Master Data--->Additional Data--->Units of Measure. There is no maintainance for Hrs to MMN conversion.
Please suggest.
with regards,
S.Dayanand

Budget Load into COPA (BAPI?)

Hey guys,
Just wondering if anyone knows of a BAPI that will essentially simulate t-code:
KE13N
The reason I ask is because there is a field limitation of 9999, and that is WAY to small for us when we want to load our budget information.
Thanks guys!

Hey Raymond,
Looks like I found the error, it's in this routine:
FORM compute_id USING it_tupel TYPE yt_comp
                      it_length TYPE yt_comp
             CHANGING e_id      TYPE y_idp.
Berechnung der id erfolgt nach dem Horner-Schema:
DATA: t_tupel   TYPE yt_comp,
        component LIKE LINE OF t_tupel.
Vorbereitung:
LOOP AT it_tupel INTO component.
    SUBTRACT 1 FROM component.
    APPEND component TO t_tupel.
ENDLOOP.
DATA: length LIKE LINE OF it_length, "Länge der i-ten Hierarchietab.
        index_from TYPE i VALUE 2,     "Aufsetzindex für Schema
        id TYPE i,                    "Zwischenergebnis für e_id
        idp TYPE y_idp.
Startwert zur Berechnung von id versorgen:
READ TABLE t_tupel INDEX 1 INTO id.
idp = id.
Durchführung der Berechnung der id (Horner-Schema):
LOOP AT t_tupel INTO component FROM index_from.
    READ TABLE it_length INDEX sy-tabix INTO length.
    idp = idp * length + component.
ENDLOOP.
e_id = idp + 1.
ENDFORM.
My guess is that it's appending to t_tupel, which is defined as a Type I, which is limited to only a four-byte integer, hence the 9999 limitation.
Is there ANY way around this?
Like I said, the OS Note doesn't apply to us cause we are at 6.04. Any other thoughts?

Sales Employee Description is not following into COPA

Dear Experts
I have set sales employee as a characteristic in my operating concern that was triggered from PAPARTNER. From there I developed then run COPA report painter (KE30) for sales employee with ALV display options. In fact the report can only display sales employee code, without the description. I desperately need sales employee description in my report, based on user requirement.
Here we didn't activate HR module. In the same time SD has defined Sales Employee as Partner Function (SE) in customer master data. The Partner Function is looked up the sales employee name from HR table, PA0001 so that they can display sales employee code and name in the customer master data.
From the story above I've tried to do some ways, such as:
Changed display options from ALV to Drilldown -> with this way, sales employee description can appear from the report, but actually I just need the ALV report because of my client didn't accept the report layout except ALV. This is my big problem.
2. I found other threads with similar problem with me, then I tried to follow that instructions that will be described below:
I tried to create new char WW100 with PARVW table for sales employee then follow these steps:
Create 2 derivation rules in KEDR using table look up (table VBPA) for the same partner function
1. In one Der Rule, make the sale order item KDPOS as constant value 0000
2. In the other one, dont make it a constant....Leave it as it is
DERIVATION RULE 1
SOURCE FIELDS
VBPA-VBELN = COPA-KAUFN
VBPA-POSNR = COPA-KDPOS
VBPA-PARVW = GLOBAL-USERTEMP1 (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = Your SD Part Function)
TARGET FIELDS
VBPA-KUNNR = COPA-WW100
DERIVATION RULE 2
SOURCE FIELDS
VBPA-VBELN = COPA-KAUFN
VBPA-POSNR = COPA-KDPOS (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = 0000)
VBPA-PARVW = GLOBAL-USERTEMP1 (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = Your SD Part Function)
TARGET FIELDS
VBPA-KUNNR = COPA-WW100
Unfortunately the ways above still can't solve my problem, the report still only show the sales employee code without description. At the last whether possible if i want sales employee characteristic with origin table coming from PA0001, so that data will derive from HR table? or perhaps any other solution to solve my case?
Please suggest me in detail..
Thanks a lot
Regards,
Maradona

Hi Maradona,
I want a clarification - Does the value flow properly to the value field and only the description is not coming?
1. If the value flow is proper and only description is a problem, then check whether compunding has been used in KEA5 for the characteristc WW100? If yes, check the text table for WW100 and compare it with the origin table in terms of the fields in both the tables.
(My guess is that not all the compunding characteristics are available in text table)
2. If value flow is a problem, then compare SE16 and SE16N for any sales order for the denotion of partner function field PARVW. Sometimes the denotion of partner function (two character code) may vary in SE16 and SE16n.
Get back for any more query
BR
Abhi

How to Integrate new material group into COPA planning KEPM

Hi Sap Guru's
Please help me in Integrate new material group into planning
The planning coordinator is informed that a new material group is to be marketed in the coming year and that this new material group should be included in planning. To generate a default plan value automatically for this new material group, the planning coordinator uses the planning method Copy. In the Transform characteristic values function, the necessary entries are then made so that the sales quantities for an existing, comparable material group are copied to the new material group.
How can i do the above process...
Thanks
Sap Guru

HI,
create a new characteristic (KEA5), choose transfer from SAP-table (the tab. where your fiels is available in material master (MARA)), choose the field from the list of available fields from MARA, enter text, save, activate. Assign the char. to your op. concern. Generate the operating concern.
Aftre this steps the field is in yopur operating concern and the derivation rule can be seen in T-Code KEDR (rule created by SAP automatically). If not, add a derivation rule in KEDR (table lookup).
best regards, Christian

PO / GR Qty into COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for