PO in transfer process cannot confirm

hi,
when the user tries to do confirmation for the particular PO it gives an error the document is in transfer process creation not possible.
kindly help
thanks
kanchan
Edited by: kanchangauri on Nov 9, 2010 2:29 PM

Hello Kanchan,
PO is not correctly created in R/3 backend: a problem occured during purchasing document replication in R/3.
So, check corresponding SRM purchasing document status (use BBP_PD transaction).
Regards.
Laurent.

Similar Messages

Error: Service process cannot be confirmed due to its status

Hi Experts,
we want to create a Service Notification (BUS2000117) as a follow-up document of a service order (BUS2000116). The problem is that we receive the following error:
Service process cannot be confirmed due to its status
*Diagnosis*
You cannot enter a confirmation for the service process due to its status.
*System Response*
To enable you to enter a confirmation for a service process, it must be released and may not yet have the status Closed .
*Procedure*
Check the service process status and if necessary, change it.
How can i shut off the control of the status as we need to create service confirmation of service orders which are still in process. Is there any customizing?
Best Regards
Oliver

To solve the problem without using the note it is possible to change customizing.
Customer Relationship Management -> Transactions -> Status Management -> Define Status Profile for User Status:
In Transaction Control is has to be assigned the Business Transaction 'To be distributed' to the relevant status.
Afterwards the service notification can be created without problems.

Product Costing - Process Order Confirmation

Dear Experts,
We are facing a situation with our Product Costing Scenario :
Under SFG Process Order Confirmation, there are Ten Phases to finally confirm the order. First Phase is for Raw Material Issuance. From Second Phase to Ninth Phase are relevant to Activity Types. Tenth Phase which is final phase, in this point Goods Receipt posting is generated.
At first phase, system posts Raw Materials Goods Issue (Movt Type 261) to Process Order:
Entry : RM (Cr), Consumption (Dr).
Client needs the system to post one more entry at the same time by : WIP (Dr), Inv Change (Cr).
Reason:
According to client, they have made consumption entry in finance but what if all raw materials are not consumed as yet and factory comes under fire, then how can they claim insurance on those Raw Materials which are not consumed and are still in the IN PROCESSING Stage?
My Answer was:
- They can find all material costs in Process Order as Debit Item.
- They can also calculate WIP but cannot post WIP in Finance unless the order is settled.
Ultimately, as per my knowledge client cannot check the unprocessed Raw Materials report in FI but they can check in CO. And this is the point of reservation from client.
They need an entry in Finance for WIP to claim insurance in case of fire and therefore they need a posting of WIP entry immediately after Goods Issue of Raw Materials to Order.
Can anyone please guide me further regarding this scenario and if any one can suggest any work around then it would be highly appreciated!
Regards,
Zain Bashir

Hi Zain
This is a very unusual question
Buddy, there is something in accounting called as "Going Concern Concept" which we all were taught in our accounting days.. That means when you do business, do it with a mindset that you are goinig to do it for long / for ever.. Accidents dont happen every day and you cant build a system around such things
Assume there is a fire (God forbid).. After the accident, you wont even know how much was lying there unconsumed which got gutted in the fire..
And insurances not just covers the stock lying consumed, but also stock manufactured and stock in the process of manufacturing (WIP)
And most importantly, dont expect SAP to throw up a figure at the click of a button.. Does your client really think that they will simply submit the report generated from SAP as-is to Insurance people?? SAP is just a technology enablement, which requires human intervention at various places
My opinion - Dont build system for such requirements
Br. Ajay M

Process order confirmation

Dear Experts,
In process order confirmation can we make a kind of restriction through configuration in which system should not allowed a confirm quantity of phase 20 is not greater than previous confirmed quantity of phase 10 there is no relationship between this two phases.
Regards,
Murari Shah

Hi.
Just my 2 cent , Not sure about standard SAP configuration perhaps there's but i don't know.
But i very sure , you can implement this with the user exist below:
===============================================================
CONFPI01 |Process order conf.: Calculate cust.specific default values
CONFPI02 |Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03 |Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04 |Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05 |Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
CONFPI06 |Process order confirmation: Actual data transfer
Customise with ABAP , please check with your abaper.
Thank you.

Need a BAPI/FM for process Order Confirmation

Hi guys,
I need a bapi or Fm for process Order confirmation.
thnx in advance

Checck
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_ACT
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT
Better read the documentation of each BAPi using the tcode BAPI and proceed.
I feel BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR would do your purpose.
Documentaion:

You can use this method to enter order confirmations for production orders.
You can also transfer good movements, that are posted together with a confirmation. If no goods movements have been entered for a confirmation, they are determined using the standard logic for backflushing and automatic goods receipt for confirmations.

Item in transfer process ( Really Urgent)

Hi All,
I am working on extended classic scenario and the problem is that after the Shopping cart is approved,the line item has the status "Item in transfer Process".
When I check the SC in t-code BBP_PD,I get the status as:
000000001 I1111 Item in Transfer Process (Active)
when I checked the item detail in table BBP_PDBEI, I found that the logical system is the SRM system i.e the system is trying to create a local PO
I also checked in RZ20 but could not find any log about the error. Also the background jobs CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2are running smooth.
I even checked out for dump in ST22 but could not find it
I am on SRM version BBPCRM 4.0 SAPKU40007
R/3 version 4.6 C SAPKH46C47
Regards,
Raj

Hi
Please go through these details ->
Re: SC item still in status "Item in Transfer Process"
Re: Shopping Cart is not creating Purchase Order
Some related SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 1040670 Requirements are greyed out in the sourcing cockpit
Note 1022756 BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT: transfer status still active after error
899006 Status I1112 and I1113 even though subsequent doc exists
757625 Incorrect Status I1112->analysis report
755769 Status I1113, no item or header relations->analysis report
631513 Shopping cart in status 'Erroneous transfer' without alert
980017 Follow-on document not created
949162 Follow-on documents exist, status I1111 and I1113 active
892274 Appl monitor: Shopping carts cannot be transferred
Note 900142 BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT: All items set to status I1111
Please open a new Customer OSS Message with SAP on this as well for faster processing.
Hope this helps
Do close the thread if your query is solved.
Regards
- Atul

Shopping cart - item in transfer process

Hello All,
We are using SRM 5.0 and the problem is that after the Shopping cart is completely approved,the line item has the status "Item in transfer Process". So, SRM PO is not created for these carts.
I have checked almost all the old threads related to this topic and tried all the possible ways suggested in those threads but the issue is not resolved.
I have collected the data for these carts, and most of the carts went into this status when large dump was created in st22. I couldn't find another other information in RZ20.
Below is the status for one of the carts in BBP_PD.
                     Status         Description                                            Inactiv
HEADER       I1009          Held                                                         X
HEADER       I1015          Awaiting Approval                                   X
HEADER       I1021          Created
HEADER       I1038          Complete
HEADER       I1106          Shopping cart ordered
HEADER       I1129          Approved
0000000001 I1111          Item in Transfer Process
Please help in resolving it.
Thanks in advance.
Muzammil
Edited by: muzamil24 on Sep 5, 2010 5:07 AM

Hello Muthu,
Yes, the clean job runs in the system. We are in SRM 5.0.
There was one requirement for one of the shopping cart which was in item in transfer process status. So, i created another cart with the same details and it processed successfully.
This issue is not with all the carts, but it is with only particular carts. I am unable to recreate this
Below are the answers for the questions you asked:
-- No, it is not a limit shopping cart
-- Source of supply is not fixed. It is chosen from the vendor list applicable for the product category selected in the SC.
-- Assignments of Cost center and other things is set up in the customised approval matrix table.
-- The approval flow is designed based on the value of the SC and the matrix type.
-- Matrix type is defined as 1,2 ,3....such that each type will have various levels of approvers.For example in type 1 there are 4
-- two approvers cannot have same set of cost assignment dimensions
Please let me know if any more information is required.
Thanks,
Muzammil

Solved my problem - random files dropped or corrupt in transfer process

Ok, problem for me similar to some others I've seen so I'll post it here: sporadic NEF files transferred with Bridge CS4 are unreadable about 1 in 20. Looking at the problem file itself, it's size is 0 bytes like the transfer process made the file, but didn't put the data into it. NEF's are still fine on the camera or cardreader. I have isolated this problem to Bridge only on the following computer while transferring JPEGs or NEFs from different cameras, cards, readers. Sometimes I'll also get random filenames with no extension as well. CaptureNX2 and explorer "drag and drop" work fine.
Windows XP 64bit
4GB RAM
2xHD RAID 0
3.0 GHz AMD
Bottom line, after a lot of experimenting, I could lessen the amount of errors that bridge made by turning down my processor. Going with that, I isolated some BIOS features and found the "cool and quiet" feature (which changes the CPU multiplier based on system load) as the problem. Now, with that feature disabled I can get 100% transfers with the system running at full speed. I would say by reading many of these threads that there are similar features on a lot of newer AMD and Intel systems that seem to not play very well with Bridge.
I know not exactly the same problem you may have, but maybe some insight to a larger issue with that function in Bridge/ACR/LightRoom
Best - Bennett

Hello and welcome to the Forums.
DBFixit by Pimlico software can be a god send at times trying to find and fix corrupt data. Although by Palms standards it is considered 3rd party software we cannot support it, but let me tell you we recommend it all the time to our customers with data issues. It is designed to work on Palm OS's and does a great job. I'm glad it worked out for you.

Setting of tolerance limit while Process Order confirmation

Dear Experts,
I want to set tolerance limit onto the components of Process Order while doing the Process Order confirmation, Please teach me what all the steps do i need to follow for doing that.
Thanks!
Regards
Sumit Kalyan

Tolarance limit what you are speaking about is for the components. In wS view what you are setting up is the for the product, not for component.
As I am aware we cannot set any tolarance limit for the component as such.
I am not sure what actually you want.
example - component A, as per the planned qty in production order is lets ussay 10, now when doing confirmation user can enter 10+ or - 1, if he neters moer than 11 or less than 9 system should not allow? is that you are trying to implinment?
If so that mayn not be possible unless otherwise you impliment some user exit.
In OPK4 what settings are there is for product and not for raw material/component

Inbound deliveries not created for Stock transfer process

Hi Every body
Inbound deliveries not created for Stock transfer process
We have Triggred Y458 output in Shipment VT02n and Output showing Green
But Inbound data not received in PO confirmation Tab
Any body help
Thanks in Advance
SAP MM

Manually processed

Data transfer processes and info packages in new client

Hi,
We have created new client from the development client.
The Info cubes and update rules are available in new client, bu the data transfer processes and info packages are not moved to the new client.
What is the actual sequence of steps to be followed when new client created from development client. Have I missed some sequence or steps. What are the sequence of steps to be followed when created a new client.
Kindly suggest to resolve this issue.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
I have never seen clients created on the BI system. As such all the objects in the BI system are client independent as well as the data stored in the tables does not have the mandt field. Hence you cannot distinguish different clients in the BI system. Also if you notice all the request in BI are workbench request and not customizing requests.
I do not think this is a viable solution. Maybe you can contact SAP.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b7/8a9a3aaf894871e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/a9/bb963a570b4b5de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,
Vikram

Error on load: System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file : error in event viewer when users want to view documents from this third party deployed scan solution

Error on load: System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file
'\\server1\SCANSHARED\.pdf' because it is being used by another process.
   at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath)
   at System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy)
   at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy)
   at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share)
   at System.IO.File.WriteAllBytes(String path, Byte[] bytes)
   at abc.Scan.Layouts.ICC.Scan.View.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
I faced this error in event viewer when users want to view documents from this third party deployed scan solution
here I have two WFS servers and they configured with load balancing in F5 .
when I enable both servers in F5 I receive this error messages in 2nd server,
when users want to view documents
adil

Do you have antiVirus installed on the sharepoint servers?
These folders may have to be excluded from antivirus scanning when you use file-level antivirus software in SharePoint. If these folders are not excluded, you may see unexpected behavior. For example, you may receive "access denied" error messages when files
are uploaded.
Please follow this KB and exclude the folders from Scanning.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952167
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Server 2012 R2 SMB - The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.

Hi,
We are having issues with Server 2012 R2 SMB shares.
We try to write some changes to a file, but we first create a temporary backup in case the write fails. After the backup is created we write the changes to the file and then we get an error:
The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.
It looks like the backup process keeps the original file in use.
The problem doesn't always occur the first time, but almost everytime after 2 or 3 changes. I have provided some code below to reproduce the problem, you can run this in a loop to reproduce.
The problem is that once the error arises, the file remains 'in use' for a while, so you cannot retry but have to wait at least several minutes.
I've already used Process Explorer to analyze, but there are no open file handles.
To reproduce the problem: create two Server 2012 R2 machines and run the below code from one server accessing an SMB share on the other server.
Below is the code I use for testing, if you reproduce the scenario, I'm sure you get the same error.
We are not looking for an alternative way to solve this, but wonder if this is a bug that needs to be reported?
Anybody seen this behavior before or know what's causing it?
The code:
string file =
@"\\server\share\test.txt";
if (File.Exists(file))
File.Copy(file, file +
".bak", true);
File.WriteAllText(file,
"Testje",
Encoding.UTF8);
The error:
System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.

Hi,
There is someone else having the same issue with yours. You could try code in the article below:
“The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process”
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawncao/archive/2010/06/04/the-process-cannot-access-the-file-because-it-is-being-used-by-another-process.aspx
If you wonder the root cause of the issue, the .NET Framework Class Libraries forum can help.
Best Regards,
Mandy
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here .
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

While deleting the virtual machine .vhd folder -- error msg : the process cannot access the file beacuse it is being used by another process

When i am trying to delete the Virtual Machine folder/directory i get the below error. Virtual machine is turned off
V:\>rmdir ME-EXCAS01 /s
ME-EXCAS01, Are you sure (Y/N)? y
ME-EXCAS01\ME-EXCAS01\Virtual Machines\1B1FD14E-B3F0-4232-9F96-2A871E879CD6.xml
- The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process
How to delete the whole folder ?
Thanks

Also, if your VM has snapshots and you delete it, you must wait for the snapshots to finish merging - the VHD files will be locked until then.
Brian Ehlert
http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
Learn. Apply. Repeat.

Recurrent error in Win32 install logs (The process cannot access the file..

hi forum !
I'm already on my third installation of Hyperion Essbase and still getting the same error within the logs :
(Jan 31, 2008 1:48:29 PM), essbaseServer7_0_0Suite, com.installshield.wizard.platform.win32.WindowsSharedFiles, err, ServiceException: (error code = -30016; message = "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
(32)"; severity = 0)
STACK_TRACE: 23
ServiceException: (error code = -30016; message = "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
(32)"; severity = 0)
     at com.installshield.wizard.platform.win32.Win32FileServiceImpl.win32SetFileModified(Native Method)
     at com.installshield.wizard.platform.win32.Win32FileServiceImpl.setFileModified(Win32FileServiceImpl.java:115)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor272.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at com.installshield.wizard.service.LocalImplementorProxy.invoke(LocalImplementorProxy.java:52)
     at com.installshield.wizard.service.AbstractService.invokeImpl(AbstractService.java:51)
     at com.installshield.wizard.service.file.GenericFileService.setFileModified(GenericFileService.java:185)
     at com.installshield.product.actions.Files.setFileTimes(Files.java:1608)
     at com.installshield.product.actions.Files.install(Files.java:460)
     at com.installshield.wizard.platform.win32.WindowsSharedFiles.install(WindowsSharedFiles.java:87)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl.installProductAction(PureJavaProductServiceImpl.java:1916)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.getResultForProductAction(PureJavaProductServiceImpl.java:5195)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitComponent(InstallableObjectVisitor.java:369)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitInstallableComponents(InstallableObjectVisitor.java:333)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitProductBeans(InstallableObjectVisitor.java:133)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.install(PureJavaProductServiceImpl.java:4563)
     at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$Installer.execute(PureJavaProductServiceImpl.java:3758)
     at com.installshield.wizard.service.AsynchronousOperation.run(AsynchronousOperation.java:41)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
can use the products but this shouldn't be fine... do I have to stop a service or grant some permission ? any help is appreciated.
thanks & regards,

not having any JAVA_HOME env var. Did some checkings and :
- one machine was having Java libraries because of DB2
- the other machine was a fresh Win2003SP1 with SQL Server 2005
guess can set JAVA_HOME to C:\Hyperion\common\JRE\Sun\1.5.0 before installing Essbase, but also guess it's a documented/automatic step... wonder what I'm missing ?
doing the most basic-mode installations (defaults, automatic deployments), once I get them clean will perform more sophisticated ones. Searched the 9.3.1 doc PDFs without useful findings.

PO in transfer process cannot confirm

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for