PO - Inv Receipt and Srv Based IV Tick

Dear All,
In PO,how do i make the IR tick in Invoice tab to be in Display mode and Serv Based IR in Display mode for service Po's.
Regards

Hi
You can make them as mandatory for the Sefvice items using filed selection , instead of making them as display using field selction for Document types
In the Customizing of account assignement category being used for Sefvices you can specify IR is binding, so that it always is ticked in the PO.
Similary in the Vendor master you can flag the Service ased IV flag, to get copied in the PO.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

GR based IV tick mark in PO- not able to post MIRO

we are working for a indian client with CIN. most of the PO's which is created in SAP system with all Excise parameters and applicable taxes. further all PO's created with GR based IV check box enabled.
now the issue is, in some of the purchases vendor is not applicable for excise, so there is no excise parameters in the PO, only tax is applicable. for this case we have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID. but we have maintained material chapter id and CENVAT determination in J1ID. but as i mentioed earlier these PO's also with GR based IV check box enabled.
If the PO is not excisable no Excise capturing and posting is required, for these types of PO's we are following the below steps
1. Creation of PO with GR based IV check box enabled
2. Goods Receipt without excise capturing
3. Invoice verification - MIRO ( here system is not able to post the docuement because of GR based IV tick mark)
waiting for the response

hi,
thanks for the response
problem is MIRO is not posting whenever GR made with GR based IV tick in PO.
i have checked three scenario
scenario1.
1. created PO with GR based IV, but there is no Excise or Tax captured in PO ( means no FV11 created)
2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
3. MIRO done with respect to MIGO
this scenario is fine
Scenario 2 - current scenario
1. Created PO with GR based IV, No excise is captured in PO but Tax (VAT captured with condition type JVRD) is captured ( means no FV11 created for VAT only)
2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
3. while doing MIRO for this scenario system is not able to post the MIRO because of the VAT in PO and GR based IV tick mark.
Scenario 3
1. Created PO without GR based IV, No excise is captured in PO but Tax (VAT captured with condition type JVRD) is captured ( means no FV11 created for VAT only)
2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
3. MIRO system is picking from PO based IV. so, it is allowing to post
need your expert advice on scenario 2 - how to post MIRO

GR Based IV Tick for SERVICE POs

Hi Friends,
How can we avoid GR Based IV Tick tht is defaulted by system for SERVICE POs with item category D.
When i tried to remove this Tick, system given error message, ": Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for valuated GR"
I want to remove this GR Based IV Tick for service PO to enable successful automatic removal of invoice blocking for such POs when GR is posted for required balance qty in system after 1st invoice is blocked by system for Price variance.
in short, how can we have SERVICE PO without GR Based IV Tick ?

1 ) when we remove GR Tick& GR Based IV Tick,
If you dont want to post GR and GR Based IV Tick, is required for post the invoice.Practically this combination is not possible.
2 ) When we tick Non valuated GR & Remove GR Based IV Tick
.if you want to post GR and you dont want to any accounting document for perticular GR.Remove GR Based IV Tick will help you PO based invoice verfication.

GR Based invoice tick to be made done after goods receipt

Hai,
I need a way to do mass updation of GR Based Invoice tick in PO in which goods is already received.
Some of POs released without this tick and migo is already done. but now I want to tick that check box
but in system it is in non editable mode.
regards
Madhu.

Hi, Madhu,
I had the same problem. This field becomes readonly when a good receipt or an invoice is booked. Mass maintenance, LSMW and CATT do not help. But you can use SE16N to set (X) the EKPO-WEBRE field and the goods receipts and the invoices take it into consideration as it was set in the first place.
Now, running SE16N for a few items it's ok, but if you have thousands of items to modify it becomes out-of-hand. I tried a LSMW on SE16N, unfortunately with no success. Then I tried a Windows program to record the keyboard and mouse actions combined with a tab delimited text file with PO number and PO item and, voila, I have 33000 items modified. The program I used is AutoIt, but there are many free programs doing the same thing.
Three notes:
1. Use it on your own risk. SAP Note 457511(FAQ: Purchase order change and goods receipt in purchasing) warns: It inevitably leads to follow-on errors because of mutual field relationships.
2. SE16N it's not a good place to fool around.
3. In this way you use SE16N online, so it takes A LOT of time.
Hope it helps,
George
Edited by: George Palaghean on Dec 14, 2009 12:34 PM

Subject: How menage the field "Srv.-based inv. ver." in create vendor MK01

Hello,
I need to set the field 'Srv.-based inv. ver.' optional during the creation of a vendor.
In the Status Group of the vendor the field is set to optional, but it still remains
invisible.
I thank you in advace. Regards,
Paolo.

Hi Paolo,
01. Use Tcode OMSG
02.Select the account group with which u create the vendor(in MK01)
03.Go to field status sub screen
04.Click on purchasing data
05.You will get a new screen, there again click on purchasing data
06.Go to page no. 3 by using page down
07.In page No.3, change the radio button to "Opt entry". Save the change.
Now try again and let us know. All the best.
Regards,
Rams

Srv-Based IV indicator in Service POs

Hi all,
What's the difference between the Srv-Based IV indicator and GR-Based IV indicator in the Invoice tab of the Serivce PO. I am aware of the fact that in order to do Serv Entry Shett in ML81N, the "Goods Receipt" indicator in the Delviery tabl of the PO has to be flagged. When this is check GR-Based IV ind is automatically flagged.
What's the effect of Srv-Based IV indicator in the PO in MIRO?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
The service based IV is aimilar to GR based IV and the service lines entered in Serviece Entry sheet are carried to Invoice verification.
When u set the serivce based IV the GR based IV is automatically ticked because for the reason that,
when u post a service entry sheet, along with it system automatically posts a material document with movement type 101 for accounting postings.(similar to a GR posting for a material in MIGO). You can see this in PO history once u complete a Service entry sheet.
regards,
MRao

Inv. receipt field for stock transport order

guyz,
when we are creating a normal PO(from me21n), in 'Invoice' tab of item overview screen, we can find following three fields
inv. receipt
GR. based IV
final invoice
however when i'm creating a stock transport order from ME21N, i'm not able to see 'Invoice' tab at all... i thought it couuld be related to document type and its field selection but not able to find these fields in field selection group for po document types....
any help?

Hi,
In case of STO (Document Type "UB"), you will not find the "Invoice" Tab if it is between plants of same Co. Code and if you are using "Supplying Plant" instead of "Vendor". But if you want to do Invoice Verification for Freight/Delivery Cost, etc... you can fill the values for freight conditions in "Conditions" tab page and also assign a Vendor to the condition type itself by going into "Details"
Standard Pricing Procedure - RM2000
And in MIRO after GR (MIGO) > Select this STPO and also select "Only Planned Delivery Cost", it will populate the values and you can do LIV.

Link between inv. number and accounting document number

Hi Frnds,
When i receive a partial receipt (of an invoice) from a customer, i am getting the link between invoice number and accounting document number from a table (BSEG), but when i am receiving the final settlement amount from the customer, i m not getting the link between the inv. no. and accounting document number. Can anyone tell me how can i get the same?

Hello,
Try to prepare query based on tables BSIK, BSAK and BSEG. (Transaction code SQVI)
Regards,
Ravi

PO Item : Delivery Tab - Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuated

Dear all,
User highlighted for a PO which she was not able to do GR. When checked, we found that the line item, with account assignment "K" - the Goods Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator is unticked. User further claim that, she did not untick both of these checkbox.
These were the steps which i have done:
1. Checked the config: IMG > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
Here i have confirmed that Goods Receipt, GR Non Valuated are already pre selected.
2. Scanned thru the whole list of User Exit found under ME21N. No enhancement related to these two fields were found.
3. Manually create a PO, with similar data in test server -- both the checkbox are pre selected by default.
Given the checking done above: If user did not manually untick the checkbox -- where else / how else can Good Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator be unticked ?
Please .. appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on this area.
Thanks in advance.

Dear All,
Many thanks for the prompt reply.
Siva,
In this case, the PO line item doesn't involve a material number. Therefore PIR is eliminated.
Jurgen,
Yes, i did actually simulate from scratch, the creation of this PO. Both the goods receipt and gr non valuated checkbox were actually ticked. It didn't jive with user's feedback which claim the boxes were originally unticked already.
Sudhir,
Yup, as material number is not involved, therefore PIR and material master is eliminated.
Thru out the day, am quite glad to make some discovery. The PO was actually converted from a PR. And guess what ?
In the PR itself, these two checkbox were already unticked ! I then simulated this scenario - create PR with untick checkbox and convert it to PO. And voila ! in the PO, both checkbox were untick as well.
Now am in the midst of finding out -- why in the PR, at the very first place, goods indicator and gr non valuated are unticked. Checking with the process owner, as the PR was generated automatically.
Thank you very much !

Goods Receipt and Goods Return entries shows as Zero in PO history.

Dear All,
The Goods Receipt and Goods Return entries are showing as "Zero" in Delivery Cost Quantity, Amt. in local currency fields in PO History (T.Code: ME23N)
What could be the reason? How to find out the error?
Expectiing valuable guidelines from the forum.
Thanks in Advance.
GB

Hi
Not ticked.
GB

Diff between GR based invoice verification and PO based invoiceverification

Dear Friends
Can any body pl clarify the difference between the GR based I V and
PO based I V and how to configure the above.
regards
rk

Hi,
Gr Based Invoice Verification : In this a separate invoice item is created for each delivered partial quantity.If we make the allocation with the purchase order system then propose more than one invoice item as a default if more than one partial delivery has been posted for the po item.
If we make the allocation using delivery note the system proposes exactly the po items from this goods receipt, plus the the quanties posted.
using gr based we can assign each invoice item uniquely to a good receipts item. Good receipt and invoices matched in po history
In Gr based invoice qty should not be greater than actual delivered qty.
Purchase Order Based Invoice Verification : In this system generates one invoice item in the item list for each po item. The system provides quantity to settle in as difference between total d livered qty and thee total invoice qty.
If we make allocation using delivery note the system determines the relevant po items with their total qty to settle-in the same way as if there was a reference of purchase order.The system will not propose qty relevant in delivery note.
If there are several good receipt the purchase order history will not tell you which invoice came from which vendor.
Br,
Tushar Patankar

GR BASED IV TICK

Dear All,
I have so many scheduling agreements of previous months with respective info records for which "GR based IV" indicator is not ticked & for vendor also its not ticked & the requirement is to get the indicator :GR based IV" ticked for all the scheduling agreements.
Now the user is trying to tick that indicator in vendor master & thot that it would reflect in S.Agreement. But the thing is system takes precedence of inforecord. if the tick is not there in Info record, it wont pick.
Now the question is ..if i tick that indicator in all the info records, whether the Scheduling agreements will adopt that or how to go about it.
Final requirement is to get the tick in "GR Based IV".

Hi,
Select the concerned PO document type and in screen layout make the GR Based IV as required entry .
Dhruba

Significance of service based IV tick in PO

Hi All
What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
Regards
Satish Kumar

>
satish kumar wrote:
> Hi All
>
> What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
>
> Regards
> Satish Kumar
This check indicates that MIRO can take place against Service entry sheet as well as PO. Same is the case with GR based IR, where IR can take place against GR and PO, if these checks are enabled.
Check this helpfull link for further details on this check:
Re: Invoice verification before SES acceptance

SUS POs update with Goods Receipts and Invoices Information

Hi SRM Experts,
We have a SRM - SUS - R/3 landscape.
1. We create POs in SRM (extended classic scenario) and transfer them to R/3 (via RFC) and to SUS (via XI Interfaces PurchaseOrderRequest_Out and PurchaseOrderChangeRequest_Out).
2. We post Goods Receipts into SRM (or alternatively into R/3).
3. We post Invoices into R/3.
Is it possible to update SUS POs with Goods Receipts and Invoices Information?
If yes, what do we have to do to update this information into SUS POs?
Thank you very much and kind regards,
Marco.

Hi Marco,
you want to update SUS POs with GR / IV data?
In a SUS environment each document counts as an own document and needs to
be customized. I am not sure about understanding your requirement.
Using the SUS-MM scenario in a classic environment enables the exchange of
documents for PO / GR / IV in a "ping-pong" mode. SUS always needs a document,
on which the next action can be based on.
Thanks,
Claudia

GR based invoice tick for Import

Hello all,
I have created Scheduling agreement for import in which GR based invoice tick comes automatically from vendor master. Now, I want to remove GR based invoice tick from Vendor master. I have made GR based invoice tick optional in SA screen layout and removed GR based tick in Vendor master but when i'm going to save it, system gives error, "fill required entry"
Now,I have made GR based tick invoice optional in Field selection group and removed GR based invoice tick and save it...but still getting the error, "The supplier has the same Tax Code".
Please suggest.

The message number is designed by your organization - ABAP team..
Go to SE91 enter the message class FB, then check for the no. 000.
Check the message where it used.. Consult with your abaper for more details about the message..

PO - Inv Receipt and Srv Based IV Tick

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for