PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

Hi Expert,
              1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers       
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system: 
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will    
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG   
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and         
XMCEKET-REWRT).                                                                               
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will         
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG         
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and   
XMCEKET-WEWRT).                                                                               
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all       
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to    
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order    
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)               
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and   
of course this information in available.                                                                               
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not            
available because of the following reasons:                                                                               
1 - System standard fields.                                              
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only                                 
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that            
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent       
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field    
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods       
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when    
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the        
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.                                                                               
2 - Performance                                                          
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that    
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),  
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.  
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the           
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new         
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,  
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices    
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and     
not goods receipt.                                                       
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the 
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity 
and values, then is natural that this information is only available 
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice. 
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that  
have a long order history.                                          
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry

Similar Messages

  • Sales value in FD33 is not matching with the system's sales documents

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly provide your valuable inputs for the below mentioned issue-
    I have one customer X ( Same for all Partner functions) defined for CCA say CN01( Risk cat, update group 000012). The applicable credit check is STATIC check, with open orders and Open delv. are ticked + Oldest open items= 10 days.
    There are two open sales oders amounting 49,854.40 CNY. Customer has the credit limit as 50,000 CNY.
    Now We have found, that the FD33 is also showing SALES VALUE as 249. CNY and split of Sales Value shows the 249 as Open billing Doc. But we could not get any Open Billing Document  that is amounting to 249.
    We have checked it in S067 ( showing 249), ran the pgm RVKRED88/RVKRED77 but Still this 249 value is appearing.
    We have found that there are two open billing Doc. - One invoice and one credit for returns in relation to same Sales cycle. Both amounts to 212.85 CNY each.
    Now i am unable to get the information as How can i check this Difference?
    Kindly suggest accordingly.
    Many thanks in advance for your understanding.

    Dear All,
    Let me give you the finding that i have got for my case:
    1. If you go to FD33, what is the value in field "Sales Value"? (any changes?)
    Sales value= 249
    2. In VA05N, choose SP, Document date & Open Orders; check for values matching the outstanding value (249)
    No values are coming in VA05
    3. Which other document types have the same Credit Group, you can check this in VOV8, check the sales doc types you are using for your business processes.
    There are a few sales doc. types that are assigned the same credit group. But what to infer from this?
    4. You say in your post "split of Sales Value shows the 249 as Open billing Doc." where exactly can you see this split?
    I have searched from Extra tab, also checked the same in other sales report say vc/2 .
    =================
    1. Check the Tcode: FBL5N to check open items
    FBL5N: Only one entry , exactly equals to the Receivables value in FD33
    2. FD33 - check oldest Open items - clik on extra - oldest open items
    No Oldest open items
    3. also check F.35 report
    Fur ther if you want to go into details what are the checks applied to your sales order you can track this by running the report CHECK_CM by using Tcode: se38 OR sa38.
    1. se38,
    2. Enter the report CHECK_CM
    3. Press F8
    4. Enter COC Number
    5. here you can see the entire credit status of Sales order either it block or not if block what are the credit check applied you can see and you also can see either its blocked - B or released - D by looking the status.
    What is COC number, I have tried to execute , and there are options of Sales Document number, I have put the input as The BILLING DOCUMENT THAT ARE HAVING STATUS " NOT POSTED TO FI" In Vf05, but it appeared"Please check the entries. No work list selected"
    I am not getting any clue as why THE OPEN BILLING DOC. value is 249, over and above the receivables value, and in system I could not find the Documents which sum up to 249.
    Kindly provide the inputs.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Dates in MD04 not matching with dat00 field of structure MDTBX

    Hi,
         I am trying to populate MDTBX structure using DTNUM field of MDKP as follows.
    "IMPORT mdtbx FROM DATABASE mdtc(ar) ID wa_mdkp-dtnum".
    Now the DATOO field of MDTBX will be same as dates in MD04 for a material , plant and a Vendor.
    But for some vendors DATOO of MDTBX has more dates when compared to dates in MD04 for the same Material and Plant.
    Why it happens so? I need the reply urgently. Kindly help me in this regard.

    Hi,
    To add the filed in the extract strucuure...
    Go to rsa6 find your data source... go to change mode >
    then double click on the extract structure... it will tale youe to the structure screen..
    Click on the Append strucutre button and add your required filed there... activate the append structure... go back and activate the structure also.
    now go back to rsa6 and again go into your data source now you can see the appended field, but it will be hidded. Remove that hiddedn check box... Save.
    Then write the code to pupulate data into that field.
    Regards,

  • PickList Update - Input values [...] does not match with expected class names

    Hi everybody!
    I try to update a picklist via b1if but I always get the following error-message:
    Exception : Input values '["3" , "3"]' does not match with expected class names '["com.sap.smb.sbo.api.ICompany" , "java.lang.Integer"]' for SBO object type '156'
    As you can see in the error-message I use object type 156 “PickLists”.
    Below you can see the message to the B1 Object – atom:
    <Payload id="atom1" Role="X">
        <System xmlns="">0010000100</System>
        <QueryParams xmlns="">
            <AbsoluteEntry>3</AbsoluteEntry>
        </QueryParams>
        <PickLists xmlns="">
            <row>
                <PickDate>20120914</PickDate>
            </row>
        </PickLists>
        <PickLists_Lines xmlns="">
            <row>
                <OrderEntry>248</OrderEntry>
                <OrderRowID>0</OrderRowID>
                <PickedQuantity>1</PickedQuantity>
            </row>
        </PickLists_Lines>
    </Payload>
    …and the result:
    <Payload status="success" id="atom2" Role="C" DImsg=" Exception :
    Input values '["3" , "3"]' does not match with expected class names
    '["com.sap.smb.sbo.api.ICompany" , "java.lang.Integer"]' for SBO object type '156'"
    DIresult="failure" keyvalue="3" keyname="AbsEntry" payload="atom1" objectid="156"
    method="Synchronous Update" b1login="Technical User" system="0010000100"/>
    I just can’t figure out meaning of the error-message…anyone can help?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best Regards
    Alex

    Hey Alex,
    I have a similar problem. I suppose you have solved your problem, because this post is very old. Perhaps you could share the solution?
    Best regards
    Benjamin

  • GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

    Hi Experts,
    My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
    but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
    I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
    Original invoice document accounting entries:
    GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
    Vendor account: Credited
    during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
    Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
    Vendor account : Debited
    GR/IR Account : Credited
    Consumption Account : Credited
    Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
    these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
    but while cancelling the  GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
    Kindly help in this regards
    Regards
    Mohan

    Hi,
    Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
    I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Himanshu Gupta

    Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
    thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
    Himanshu Gupta

  • Open order value showing in VA05 not matching .

    Hi Guru ,
    In VA05 open order value in not matching with open order value in FD33 in cretit master .
    Please provide input .
    Edited by: Ravi Deolalikar on Jun 16, 2010 5:24 PM

    1/ Check your credit control area settings
    2/ Check your sales order config, if it works for one sales order type and not the other compare the two/

  • Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

    Dear Friends,
    we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
    We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
    We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
    The sequence we followed as:
    IN R/3
    Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
    Stock intialization
    Material Movements
    Evaluations
    IN BW
    We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
    2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
    2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
    2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
    When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
    But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
    We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
    Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
    Please help us with your inputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi Sudheer,
    No We haven't implemented this note.
    In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
    INSERT BEGIN
      loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
        if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
           DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
          delete DATA_PACKAGE.
        endif.
      endloop.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    INSERT END
    We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
    ==========================================================
    Notes:
    However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
    1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
    2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
       1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
       2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
    3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
    4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
    -> material consumption value:
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                                "Transfers
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
    ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                                "Transfer
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
      ELSE.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
        RETURNCODE = 4.
      ENDIF.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0..
    -> material consumption quantity:
    The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    -> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
    5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
    =======================================================

  • The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

    Hi ,
    We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and  as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
    We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
    "The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
    this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
    Please let us know reason behind this error message.
    Thanks,
    Mruduala

    You are kidding?  It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
    Habe you read the error message? 
    Quote:
    java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
    Check the trigger and it should work again.
    Timo

  • GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

    Hi,
    The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
    Quick response will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

    Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
    Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
    1. We need to update records for April- May.
    2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
    Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
    Regards

    hi ELI
    i have checked the follwoing secnarios
    1. funds management deactivated.
    2. one document posted  with amount10000
    3. funds management activated.
    4. we have executed FMN0
    here no document is selected after execution.
    Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
    Regards

  • Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

    Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
    Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
    Thanks

    is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
    if then,
    From Front-end:
    Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
    From Database side:
    1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
    2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
    Is that BI-Apps project?
    btw, whtz ur name?

  • Error the entered value does not match the specified field type

    Hi,
    When I try to insert a null value to a field of the User Defined Table I am getting the error "The entered value does not match the specified field type" in SAP Business One version 2007 PL 42.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sudha.

    Hi Sudha,
    It probably have to do with how you defined the field.
    Is Null value allowed?
    What are the field definitions?
    Thanks,
    Jesper

Maybe you are looking for

  • ORA-06502 while running a function in a report

    Hi guys, I am having a problem executing this function in my report to get the beg balance for my statment. any idea as why -- the error I am getting is ORA-06502 Thanks ========================================================= function CF_OPNE_BALFo

  • Assembly BOM Option

    How do I need to configure an item in order for it to display an assembly BOM option? I take a current item which is configured as an assembly BOM and duplicate it. Give it a new code and name, then add it. When I go to Bill Of Materials and want to

  • JAI 1.1.3 installation on Windows 7 fails

    I have Windows 7 (64 bit). The version of Java thats installed on my machine is 1.6. 0_20-b02. I downloaded jai-1_1_3-lib-windows-i586-jdk and tried to install. It fails with a warning that JDK1.3 or higher must be installed. Isnt 1.6 higher than 1.3

  • I need to make my PDF document to contain Hyperlinks for future editing

    I am making up some documents (initially in CS) which will have some details that will later need to be edited. Such as dates, etc. In those areas of the document; I believe I can add a hyperlink for that purpose. I only want these parts of the docum

  • Powl config

    Hi Exports, Whenever I try to display POu2019s with change version in advance search by having changed version check box checked, the search will never return POu2019s. Is there any configuration I am missing in POWL? Please help me any input is appr