PO is not generated for completed SC in SRM.70 classic scenario.

Hi,
I am working on SRM 7.0 - Classic scenario.
When a shopping cart is complete in terms of price, vendor (assigned) and other required data, item stays in transfer process. even we are adding items from catalog.
If a SC is incomplete a PR document is created in backend without a problem but when a complete SC is oredered, the status of shopping cart remains item in transfer process. I can see in table BBP_PDBEI, backend object type (BE_OBJECT_TYPE) is correctly selected as BUS2012 and the document number of PO is also correctly selected.
This is the case even for the SC ordered using catalog materials.
I have checked following configuration and it seems to be ok.
1. 'Define objects in backend system's
2. Number ranges definition in SRM and ECC
3. Document type attribute -BSA in PPOMA_BBP
Configuraiton wise everything seems to be, I tried to manually transfer the SC using FM BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER but it does not change the status of SC it remains I1111
RZ20 does not show any error for the SC with status I1111.
Is there any sepcial FM to push the SC in SRM 7.0?
Any help/tips would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Ravi

learnt that PO number has generated in SRM and the same PO number not exist in ECC.
check SM58 , rz20 log or Application monitor for the shopping cart.
or monitor shopping cart click the icon follow on document and errror message must throw in 1 minutes.
let us see .
1. what is the settings in define backend OBJECTS
2. check all basic data in the shopping cart - especially org data
3. run bbp_check_consistancy report for your id?
4. every user has the same issue?
SEE THE RICHARDO technique
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/ShoppingCartStatusI1111-+Resubmit
Muthu
Report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED is available to change the status of the shopping cart item from I1111 to 'Error in transmission' (I1112) and later on, it is possible to retransfer this shopping cart from Application Monitor/Monitor Shopping Cart transactions.
1480994  How to process a shopping cart with status I1111
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Jul 16, 2010 11:31 PM

Similar Messages

  • Connection has no password, -jdbc.xml file not generated for connection

    Hi,
    I'm migrating a jdev 10g web application (with EJB) to 11g, i did the automatic migration tool offred by 11g, i'm using the integrated weblogic server but it seems there is a *-jdbc.xml file missed, and it must be generated, this is the log file of the start of server :
    IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
    [Running application SAB_ADMIN on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
    [09:14:15 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
    [09:14:15 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
    [09:14:18 AM] Retrieving existing application information
    [09:14:19 AM] Running dependency analysis...
    [09:14:19 AM] Deploying 4 profiles...
    [09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ViewControllerWebApp.war
    [09:14:21 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war
    [09:14:25 AM] Wrote EJB Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelEJB.jar
    [09:14:25 AM] WARNING: Connection DBConnectionSAB has no password. DBConnectionSAB-jdbc.xml file not generated for connection DBConnectionSAB.
    [09:14:26 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN
    [09:14:26 AM] Deploying Application...
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.065--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:28.299--ServerSession(40464643)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.user.Session_user.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'SessionEJB' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'SessionEJB' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.bouton.Session_bouton.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_bouton' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_bouton' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.mergeEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-012035> <The Remote interface method: 'public abstract java.lang.Object oracle.operation.Session_operation.persistEntity(java.lang.Object)' in EJB 'Session_operation' contains a parameter of type: 'java.lang.Object' which is not Serializable. Though the EJB 'Session_operation' has call-by-reference set to false, this parameter is not Serializable and hence will be passed by reference. A parameter can be passed using call-by-value only if the parameter type is Serializable.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.user is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.user should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.driver is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.driver should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.url is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.url should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Notice> <EclipseLink> <BEA-2005000> <2010-10-14 09:14:29.656--ServerSession(42285779)--property eclipselink.jdbc.password is deprecated, property javax.persistence.jdbc.password should be used instead.>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101371> <There was a failure when processing annotations for application C:\Users\Moshe\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.3.37.56.60\o.j2ee\drs\SAB_ADMIN\ModelWebApp.war. Please make sure that the annotations are valid. The error is oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet>
    <14 oct. 2010 09 h 14 GMT+01:00> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID '1287044066833' for task '0'. Error is: 'weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root''
    weblogic.application.ModuleException: Failed to load webapp: 'SAB_CRUD-Model-context-root'
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppModule.prepare(WebAppModule.java:404)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ScopedModuleDriver.prepare(ScopedModuleDriver.java:180)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.prepare(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:199)
         at weblogic.application.internal.flow.DeploymentCallbackFlow$1.next(DeploymentCallbackFlow.java:508)
         at weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:41)
         Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    Caused By: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:280)
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:253)
         at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:56)
         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:303)
         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
         Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace

    This is the content of my web.xml file where i found the markup <servlet> and i tried to run without the first one but the error still like it was :
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet</servlet-class>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <description>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</description>
    <display-name>Web Service MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</display-name>
    <servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.controll.ConnexionBaseDeDonnees</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>oracle.controll.ResultatRequete</servlet-class>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/faces/*</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>resources</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/adf/*</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>MyConnexionServiceSoapHttpPort</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>ResultatRequetePort</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/ResultatRequetePort</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    Thanks...

  • Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays

    Hi
    creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
    Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
    the plant calander  is also  correct
    with regards
    partha

    Hi
    I would really double check the factory calendar ans the  of the plant and sales organisation
    regards,
    Sidi

  • Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

    Dear all,
    Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
    but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
    Asset is Dr to GR/IR
    Process is
    1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
    2. Customs miro based on p.o.
    3. Do GR with excise
    4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
    What will be cause of this problem ?
    How to solve this issue ?

    The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment  in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
    The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
    rewdzzzz is full if correct
    Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

  • Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.

    Dear all ,
    my issue is
    accounting document not generating for excise invoice
    we are creating accounting document in J1iin
    with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
    the accounting document for billing document is generated
    so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
    please help
    regards
    Subrat

    IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India ->  Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check if the following is maintained or not
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAED PLA AED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLABED PLA BED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLACESS PLA cess account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLAECS PLA ECS Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      PLASED PLA SED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
    DLFC       CR Credit      RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    DLFC       DR Debit       MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
    Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India ->  Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client)

  • Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help

    Dear all ,
    my issue is
    accounting document not generating for excise invoice
    we are creating accounting document in J1iin
    with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
    the accounting document for billing document is generated
    so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
    please help

    Dear G. Lakshmipathi,
    As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
    so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
    so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
    how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
    so please help me in this regards.
    Thanks with Regards
    Subrat

  • TimeStream  Error (not generated for year 1970)

    Dear Experts ,
    I am facing a problem with Time Stream .... When i try to open a Planning Book i am receiving the following message:
    Timestream (TS ZBRSNP_ZF ) not generated for year 1970
    Message no. T9507
    Diagnosis
    The date is outside the periods maintained in the factory or planning calendar (timestreams).
    System Response
    The error causes a system crash.
    Procedure
    a) Regenerate the timestream as far in the future (or possibly the past) as possible
    or
    b) Use the report ZZTSTRDELE to delete the runtime objects of the timestreams, if changes have been made to Customizing settings. For more information, see SAP Note 169885.
    It starts happen after i included Initial Column at Planning Book .... The Factory Calendar that i am using starts on 2006 and ends on 2020 .... The timestream i am using is looking for 2 years in the past and 9 years in the future.
    *The message above says that it is necessary to execute report ZZTSTRDELE but i am having some problems while donwloading SAP note. It is possible do delete it manually?  exist another way to fix this issue?
    Please i hope someone can help me as soon as possible ....
    My Best Regards
    Mauricio Filho

    Hi Sunitha,
    We have same type of problem now, could you plz adivise me how to fix this error and where we need to configure to overcome this error.
    Thanks in advance
    Sreeenivasu

  • J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011

    Hi,
    J1INQEFILE is not generating for the month of March 2011, we have executed Qefile from 01/01/2011 to 31/03/2011 then file is generating but March 2011 data is not available.
    Problem is challans were updated in the month of April 2011 for March 2011 documents, When we executed J1INMIS report with Bank Challan status, documents are coming in the report.
    As per our understanding Challan numbers and Bank Challan update should be done in the month of March 2011 but challans and Bank challans were updated in the April 2011.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

    Hi Vara,
    Please check following thing in the system.
    1) When the Challan is created ( March month or April 2011)
    2) When the Bank challn updated for the challans
    3) If the Challan created in the April and generating returns for the month of March 2011.
    4) Check in J1INMIS report for the month posting date 01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011, if the external Challan number is appearing or not for the documents.
    5) If the Challan created in the April ask user to revere through J1INREV, and make Challan in the month of march 2011.
    Problem will solve.
    Thanks,
    Ratnam.

  • Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt

    Hi,
    i created RMA receipt but for this credit memo not generated in AR, Manually i have run the Workflow Background Process  & Receiving transaction processor concurrent also. even though CM not generated(In AR Interface lines table also data is not available)..or else is there any possibility for cancel or return the RMA Receipt quantity?
    regards
    Balaji
    Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:22 PM
    Edited by: user9122706 on May 15, 2012 9:51 PM

    Dear Balaji,
    Credit memo not generated for RMA Receipt,Can u put manual credit in AR
    Regards,
    Shineee..

  • Pur req not generated for MRP element Planned order in stock reqmnts list

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I have a problem where in MD04, pur req is not generated for the MRP element Planned order for a future date (about two months from now). Is there a specific reason? why is it not being generated? The MRP type is PD. The procurement type is F - external procurement. Can anybody please help me on this?
    Thanks
    Anusha

    Anusha,
    ??  Not sure I understand the question.  Are you saying MRP is creating planned orders instead of  purchase reqs?  Or, are you saying that no proposals at all are being created outside of two months?  Or, are you saying that the system is creating purchase reqs inside of two months, and planned orders outside of two months?
    Regardless, these problems are probably related to your MRP settings.  Try the following settings:
    NEUPL   Regenerative planning             
    1       Purchase requisitions             
    3       Schedule lines                    
    1       MRP list                          
    3       Delete and recreate planning data 
    2       Lead time scheduling and capacity planning
    on your MDBT screen.
    Regards,
    DB49

  • Accounting document not generated for cancled credit memo

    Hi,
    its related to rebet
    den cancled credit memo.but accounting document not generated.
    after that created new rebet and accounting document generated..so in document flow status showing open for cancled credti memo. how to delete or clear this? or how to cancle this?
    kindly help me on this,
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Minesh Soneji

    Error message:
    validation user has got error " Doc.Date<=Post.Date and  Postind Date <= Current date"
    kindly help me on this..
    global docs creaetd.........................................completed
        global invoice created... ...............................completed
             accounting document created.............not cleared
                 cancle of credit memo ......................open
                     global docs created........................cleared
                          accounting docs created ........cleared.
    i need to remove this status cancle of credit memo , status is open, there should be accounting docs...
    kindly help me on this..
    this is related to rebet.
    thanks,
    minesh soneji

  • DME not generated for a few documents

    I see in F110,
    Parameters have been entered
    Payment proposal has been created
    Payment proposal has been edited
    Payment run has been carried out
    Posting orders: 162 generated, 114 completed
    DME output did not include a few documents (48 of them). Do you know what are the probable reasons?
    Any help will be appreiciated.

    Solved. Program/include checked for hard coding limiting line items. Inaddition, update termination also happens.

  • Part1 is not generating for Vendor Subsequent delivey

    Hi ASAP
    I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
    1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
    For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
    Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
    2. For Vendor return Delivery
    MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
    For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
    3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
    MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122. 
    While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
    Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
    Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
    If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
    Thanks & Regards
    Manoj K Singh

    Hi Rajaram,
    Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
    Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices",  assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
    Manoj K Singh

  • Part1 is not Generating for Vendor Subsequent Delivery

    Hi ASAP
    I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
    1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
    For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
    Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
    2. For Vendor return Delivery
    MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
    For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
    3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
    MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122. 
    While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
    Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
    Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
    If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
    Thanks & Regards
    Manoj K Singh

    Hi Rajaram,
    Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
    Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices",  assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
    Manoj K Singh

  • Planning File Entry not generated for items releveant to PM

    MRP procedure used for material is reorder based planning , in April -09 the stock for this material is consumed and becomes
    zero (reorder point is 8 ,Maximum Stock Level is 8 ) and after that in MRP run the requirement is not generated .
    But as per the setting of reorder point PR should be initiated.
    When checked the MD21 , material is not flagged ,
    I want to know the specific reason why only  this material is not flagged for MRP run.
    What all settings i can check ?
    MATERIAL TYPE : YMRO   OP Maint/ Repair/OperSup
    Lot size : Repl. to max. stock level after cov. req
    Procurement type   :  F

    Hi,
    Run the reports MDRE & MDAB to ensure the planning file entries are correct.
    About your query what might have caused a entry not to be in planning file, well it could be many. So run the above reports & then run MRP & check the results.
    Regards,
    Vivek

Maybe you are looking for