PO line item locking issue

Hi,
Does anyone had this issue before?
In ECC5, we lock the PO line item using FM ENQUEUE_EMEKKOE, but SAP still lets you create/confirm Transfer Orders for Inbound delivery, however, the same FM is not allowing you to create/confirm TO's in ECC6.

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

Similar Messages

Goa line item sequencing issue

Hello experts,
I am facing a problem in GOA line item sequencing in SRM 4.0.
I create a GOA with lets say 3 line items and distribute it successfully to the backend.
Now if I want to add extra items using option 'Add Calaog items' from R/3 material and service catalog. The new items that I select and tranfer to SRM are created under line item 53 54 and so on..
Why is this gap in the line items and why I can't I get the new line items in proper sequence?
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
CM

Hello CM,
Have you received any repsonse on this? we are facing same issue.

Order Line Item Status Issue

Experts,
The way that order line item status is determined in SAP is causing confusion with our customers how are using our ECommerce for ERP module. The line item status does not take into account the line item's delivery statuses. For example, a line can be complete in SAP, even through its delivery is partial. From a customer's standpoint, the line item is not complete until all the deliveries are complete.
I would love to hear how are other companies are addressing this issue? Do they enhance the ECommerce module, or ECC?

Check the [Modification Guide|https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000469462006E/]" for the tip. See the section on Replacing calls to standard function modules.
Register the function module within WEB-INF/xcm/customer/modification/modficationconfig.xml
<function-module-replacement>
<param name=u2018fm:CRM_ISA_SHOP_GETLISTu2019 value=u2018Z_CRM_ISA_SHOP_GETLISTu2019/>
</function-module-replacement>
Instead of the standard function module, your function module will be called during runtime.
Easwar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com

Confirmation Reversal - PO Line Item Edit Issue

As per the business rule, if you reverse/delete the confirmation on a line item on the PO, you should be able to edit that line item.
However, in my case, even after deleting confirmation also, PO line item cannot be changed.
Generally when you delete the confirmation, where(which table) does this info stored and where shuld I look for this info - which Badi, FM?.
Currently what is happening is that when you change a line item, the program looks in table bbp_pdbei table and if the entry exists, it thinks that that line item is confirmed. Is that ok or should this entry be deleted from this table if the confirmation is deleted.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

FS10n Line item display issue

Hi,
When we are displaying line items in credit side of FS10N (double clic option), the result shows some line items with positive sign (It supposed to show only minus sign in all items). Is it correct? Is there a reason? Is it a bug?
If someone has an idea please let me know,
Thanks in advance,
Roberto C.

Hi Roberto,
please check, whether the mentioned items represent negative postings. Check if BSEG-XNEGP ='X'.
Please check note 1258687 as well.
Regards,
Joosz

Line item number issue when manually created PO is attached to Auto PO

Initially, we have an automatically-created PO with 4 line items. We created another PO in R3 system and added the line items to the auto-PO. When this was added as 5th line, the item number listed was 14 (instead of 5). Could you help me investigate on this?
Thank you!

hi..
please check the number assignment for your PO document type...
whether there is serial number profile assigned to that Doc type or not....
Thanks..

Line item dimension issue

Hi,
      I am on development system and want to know the fact and dimension % as I need to create line item dimesion.
One solution is executing program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGN.
      But if I want to use this same program in Production system, it will take a lot of time and will engage resources......
      Kindly suggest me as to how to find out which dimension should be made a line item dimension?
Thanks,
Sonu

Hi,
Use RSRV.
Execute RSTRV and here you have the option of single cubes.
This takes the ourput from the same tables where the SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS takes.
All Elementary Tests -> Database -> Database Information about InfoProvider Tables.
Give your infocube name here and execute.
It gives you a good detailed output.
Thanks
Ajeet

Header line item mapping issue in LSMW

Hello experts,
I am trying to map my data in LSMW with header and line items.My structure looks like this.
1header col1 col2 col3 (2item) col1 col2
1header col1 col2 col3 (2item) col1 col2
In the line item col1 changes its posting key.
Header is reapeating for every line items how to map the above in LSMW .
How to upload the data only when the Reference document number is changing??
Thanks and regards,
Vijay Simha CR

Hi ,
at Step 3-->maintain source fields -->Double Click on the Key Field -->Tick the check of Selection Field....
here you need to decide which one is the key field...if you dont have key field in Item level then create one.
regards
Prabhu

Line item confirming issue

We have a probelm with TAPA/TAN orders confirming the product. The TAPA line may "confirm " the entire amount requested , but the TAN line only confirms what is available even with the complete button checked on the order, therefore, if the sales person doesnot notice that the TAN line is not fully confirming, we may ship partial loads of orders. this is a manual process that is causing problem to the customers. How to resolve so that both item line confirm or donot confirm. Plz help.
Thanks!

Path
SPROSD-BFAC and TOR-ACAC with ATP-Define default settings
Here configure the last field with B-Full delivery.
This will solve your problem. If you keep as B, it will confirm only the full quantity for the material, else it wont confirm at all.
Rwd if it helps.

Help on GOA screen control at line item for only material

Hello All
scenario:-
1. create a GOA
for a material with has alternative UOM ( CAR - ORDER UNIT ; 1 CAR - 34 ea) . So i created GOA FOR MATERILA LINE ITEM.
FOR CAR .
2. I released GOA and distributed GOA for CAR as Oeder Unit UOM.
3. now my buyer go to GOA and change UOM as EA and price I AND CHANGE THE PRICE IN THE SAME LINE ITEM.
4. No PO released against the COntract in the ECC
5. Unfortunately buyer could change this UOM from CAR to EA. now GOA shows as EA in the line item
6. this info taken to ECC via IDOC but this info never updated in ECC contract.
7. my PO release as CAR forever rather than EA since my ECC contract always shows as CAR
i can lock this item i can create a new line item, no issues.
how buyer knows each time ? if the system allows buyer always try to change rather than entering new item. it is not buyer fault. it is srm fault.
Now ican u suggest some code in ui control badi , if the PO not releases system should not allow to change the UOM in the GOA line item for a material.
PS:- once PO released against contract . srm will not allow to change the UOM . that is fine.
SAP has to correct this problem and release the note.
Muthu

Hi Donald/SCot/ kiran/ jay...
are you having the same problem in SRM 700. front end validation is required here toooooo...
please help me.
I could not accept this functionality ..
why SRM allows to change the UOM by the buyer after release the GOA for the same line item
if srm allows to do edit, SAP SRM and ECC has to update the same UOM in the existing purchasing contract. IDOCs carry all new uom but why not updated in ECC purchasing contract.
decided to write own logic in ui badi to protect this. what to do
Muthu

Partial Quantity and Line item not showing in MIGO

HI All,
My User create STO and after save it is automatically created OBD and PGI through BARCODE now problem is at the time MIGO it is take partially quantity.when i going to do manually rest quantity it is not showing all line items.
Issue 1. It is showing only one line item instead of two line item Qty.
2. When i am going to select purchaseorder at migo instead of OBD its showing two line item.
Please suggest what to do.

HI Please check i am sending screen shot

EBP PO : Unable to duplicate/copy item,GR_NON_VAL issue

Hello,
I am using SRM 5.O .
In Process PO when I go to create the PO with more than one line item following issue comes :
When I entered one line item and check its ok when I click on Duplicate Selected Item or Copy push button than check following error appears .
Flag 'Automatic Settlement' at item level is different; Change not possible
Flag 'Invoice Expected' at item level is different; Change not possible 
Thanks ,
Sachin
null
null

Hello,
I have debugged whole program and found when there is single line item everything is fine & when i clicked on Duplicate Selected Item the value of GR_NON_VAL indicator set in first line item and second Items indicator as it is blank .Where single line Item indicator was blank .
When I am copying the line item than its working OK .
Due to mismatch in items followinng program raise error message .
PERFORM downward_inheritance USING p_hgp_ecom
 p_hgp_icom
 p_guid
 p_object_type
 p_itm_icom
 ls_igp_icom
 p_changed
 CHANGING ls_header.
Is there any idea why system behaving like this ?
Thanks,
Sachin

Issue while UNDELETE the PO line item

Hi MM Sapperu2019s,
I am facing an issue where one of my user wrongly activated the deletion for 1 line item in the PO and now when I tried to undelete the PO line item it was giving me the below error,
Error as Requisition XXXXXX, item XXXX, assigned to other order account
Message no. 06251
Please help me to fix this issue.
PS:
I have found similar SDN links but where the issue is PO has linked with Sale order and in my case the PO account assignment has linked with network.
Moderator do not lock this query saying that similar issue has been already discussed
Awaiting for the experts reply.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Is that the background to your problem:
you have a requisition and you created a PO 1 for this requisition,
then you deleted the PO 1 and requisition became open again,
then the requisition was change in account assignment
and then you created a PO 2 for this requisition.
what do you expect from re-opening the PO 1?

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items 0FIGL_O14 Performace issue

Dear Forum,
We are facing a performance issue while loading the data to 0FIGL_O14 General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
Please see my requirement below for updating the data to 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
This report is generated to display Dry Dock and Running Repair expenses for the particular Purchase orders with respective G/L's.
1) The G/L DSO will provide us the 0DEBIT_LC and    0DEB_CRE_DC Foreign currency amount with signs (+/-) amounts and.
2) ZMMPRC01 Cube   will provide us the 0ORDER_VALUE (Purchse order value)and    0INVCD_AMNT Invoice amount.
While we are loading the data from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO ,we have created nearly 19 InfoObject level routine to derive the below mentioned fields data for MM Purchase Order related records.
0CHRT_ACCTS    Chart of accounts
0ITEM_NUM      Number of line item within accounting documen
0AC_DOC_NO     Accounting document number
0GL_ACCOUNT    G/L Account
0COMP_CODE     Company code
0COSTCENTER    Cost Center
0CO_AREA       Controlling area
0COSTELMNT     Cost Element
0SEGMENT       Segment for Segmental Reporting
0BUS_AREA      Business area
0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
0AC_DOC_NR     Document Number (General Ledger View)
0AC_DOC_TYP    Document type
0POST_KEY      Posting key
0PSTNG_DATE    Posting date in the document
0DOC_CURRCY    Document currency
0LOC_CURTP2    Currency Type of Second Local Currency
0CALQUART1     Quarter
0CALYEAR       Calendar year
For reference Please see the below logic to derive the data for PO related record.
DATA:
      MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
$$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
    ... "insert your code here
    types : begin of ty_FIGL,
                CHRT_ACCTS type /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS,
                ITEM_NUM type /BI0/OIITEM_NUM,
                AC_DOC_NO type /BI0/OIAC_DOC_NO,
                GL_ACCOUNT type /BI0/OIGL_ACCOUNT,
            end of ty_FIGL.
    data :it_figl type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_figl,
          wa_figl type ty_figl.
    SELECT single CHRT_ACCTS
                    ITEM_NUM
                    AC_DOC_NO
                    GL_ACCOUNT from /BI0/AFIGL_O1400
                      into wa_figl
                      where DOC_NUM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_NUM and
                            DOC_ITEM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_ITEM and
                            /BIC/Z_PCODE = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_PCODE
                            and
                            /BIC/Z_VOY_NO = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_VOY_NO
                            and
                            FISCYEAR = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCYEAR.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      RESULT = wa_figl-AC_DOC_NO.
    ENDIF.
    clear wa_figl.
Please note the same kind of logic is applied for all the above mentioned fields.
Here is my concerns and issue.
For the all above all routines i am referring BI0/AFIGL_O1400
DSO and finally loading to the Same DSO(BI0/AFIGL_O1400
The worried part is my DSO 0FIGL_O1400 is currecnly having nearly 60 Lacks records and MM cube is having nearly 55 requests which are required to update to the Above DSO for PO related PO value and Invoice amount.
The big issue here is while uploading data from MM cube to DSO say for example if the request is having 25,000 records from this nearly 500-600 records will be updated to DSO.
But here it is taking huge time ( nearly 3 days for request ) for updating these records , like this i have to pull 50 more requests from Cube to DSO as per the requirement.
Please note as of now i haven't created any indexes on DSO to improve this loads.
Please note am facing this issue in Production environment and need your help ASAP.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas Padugula

Hi,
If selecting data from 0FIGL_O14 is taking long time then you can create secondary indexes on DSO.
0FIGL_O14 would be huge as data volume directly corresponds to data volume in BSEG.
But for you requirement, I think what you can do is,
1. create multiprovider on top of DSO and Cube and create Bex report to give you the fields requried from both the infoproviders, you can then use open hub or APD approach to keep the data in the staging table or direct update DSO and then load the data to the DSO
2. Create secondary indexes on DSO so that fetching would be faster.
3. Do the enhancment at R/3 level to fetch fields from MM during load of G/L
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.

F110 Issue Split of Vendor line items in Clearing document

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a strange problem with F110 payment programme when i am clearing the single vendor line items example 4 line items through F110 system is spliting 4 line items into 4 different clearing doucments rather than creating one clearing document and showing an error 098 in document payment list.
Can you please guide me in this issue
Regards
Srini

HI
This may happen because of any of the following settings:
1) in the vendor master, payment transaction company code area, "individual payment" check box is selected
2) "single payment for marked item" check box is selected in payment methos company code.
Deselect the check box for making single payment for multiple open item

PO line item locking issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for