PO,MIGO zero value item, not picking in MIRO

HI All,
In my Vendor Return Po one line item(Sample good) is created with Zero value.
GR and the entry is zero value. There is no issue at all.
But upon MIRO, it is automatically not seen in the line item
Can any one tell is it standard....or we cab bring the zero value line item in MIRO also.

Why are you mixing return and free item ?
Return is used to return material from your godown to vendor..
Free item is used to purchase material from vendor for free of cost...
If you maintain the free indicator in PO, then you are saying to system, that you purchase the item for free of cost..
You can see the Invoice Tab - Invoice Receipt option get unticked when you tick the free item in PO line item..
It will never appear in MIRO...

Similar Messages

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Excise base value is not picking for Imports

Dear All,
     Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
          Please suggest me
Thanks,
Tiru

Hi,
In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
JCDB     IN:Basic Custom Duty
JCV1     IN : CVD
JECV     IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV     IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB     IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB     IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC     Addnl Duty of Custom
These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice

Excise value are not pick

hi experts
hi i have a problem while doing billing document against sales order and outbound delievery excise values are not pick by the system.but in the sales order it is showing . please help to resolve this issue ..

Dear Farhan,
Just take a help of an SD consultant it is a matter of 2 min for him to solve this issue.
still Go to tcode VTFL
and search for your delivery type and your billing type and double click on the same,
2.Then you will have an item folder on the left side click on that and you will get the list of all item category.
3. Double click your item category YP05 and on the right side lower end you will get the Price type - in that enter "D" instead of "G"
and Save it. then transport it to your quality and do the sales order process again.
REgards,
Sudhir

R/3 ZCOND values are not picked properly in BW

We had a issue in one of the BW Reports. There are three types of discounts offered in the sales, namely Hospital Discount, Market Discount & Pharmacy Discount.
For certain billing document nos, the R/3 and BW values were not matching. However, the Net Amount is matching.
There is a table by the name ZVBW_PRICE_COND which is a view created out of the tables VBRK, VBRP & ZSBW_PRICE_COND.
In R/3, we put the POSNR value (Billing Item) and BELNR value (Billing Doc no.) to generate KNUMV value (Number of Document Condition) and KSCHL values.
In the KONV table, we put the KPOSN (Condition Item no.) = 10, KNUMV value and KSCHL value (Condition Type) to get the Condition value.
The value generated was ok and were same as that of vf03.
Now we checked the Data source 2LIS_13_VDITM and its extract structure.
Here we found Field only in Customer Exit checkbox ticked for ZCOND1 to 4.
However, in BW, there are specific Infoobjects like Condition Value1,2,3,& 4 each of which is directly mapped to ZCOND1,2,3,& 4 respectively.
Hospital Discount and Market Discount are mapped to ZCOND3 & ZCOND2 respectively in the concerned report.
I could have remove the ticks in the checkbox and make ZCOND accesible to extractor. But problem is that it is only certain billing doc nos for which discounts are not matching. Any help will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Surajit

Hi,
This checkbox is set for those fields of the datasource(in rsa6) which are custom fields,and whose values are determined by a user-exit written in tcode CMOD.
We have observed that keeping this checkbox ticked or unticked does not make any difference at all.So even removing this checkbox for your 4 fields will not solve the mismatch issue.
The mapping for the 4 fields in your case,is already there in BW.
Please go to tcode CMOD,enter the BW project name,select components and click on display.4 user exits will be displayed.
1st is for TD datasources,2nd for master data attr,and next are for text and hierarchies.
Double click on 1st exit FM,then double click on the include program,and find the exit code written for your datasource.Most probably user-exit not working OK.
cheers,
Vishvesh

TANN item category item not picking for return sales order

Hi all,
I have a question regarding TANN item category. This TANN item category item is not picking for return sales order type. As far as i know RENN is the free goods for return sales order. Can you please clarify the above question further

Hi
If you are making return order by copying sales order then please see this procedure also.
Try to check in the copy control also.
Go to the following path IMG u2013 Sales and Distribution u2013 Sales u2013 Maintain Copy control for sales documents. (Tcode VTAA)
Select copying control : sales document to sales document.
Search your return delivery order from the reference sales document type.
Then select the item from the left side Colum.
Go and find out TANN item category and click on detail.
Check out Item Cat proposal. If it is empty then type your RENN condition type over here.
Now try to create the return sales order it might work.
Raj.

Customet open item not picking

Hi,
In my customet line item showing 2 open items.But while doing FB05 its showing only one open item.
Can anybody please tell me the reason?
Regards
R.Sasikumar

Hi Sasi,
As per my knowledge that missed open item was picked at that time of APP run.
If you delete the unposted proposals.it will appear in FB05.
May be this information is useful to you
If you have any doubt feel free to ask
Regards,
Surya

Batch job - 'Zero' value is not loading in Target Syatem

Hello All,
Could any one please clarify me whether '0' value will be replaced in the Destination, if destination is having some number.
Ex Target Planning Area is having some number (ex: 20) for particular CVC and Source Planning Area is having Zero value for the same CVC.
Now after the Planning Area copy job runs, whether Target CVC will be loaded with Zero value or will it have same old value(ex: 20) ??
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Kishore

Hi Rahul,
In the TSCUBE Screen go to Keyfigure assignment
Regards
JB

TAXES NOT PICKED IN MIRO

Hi all,
THERE IS PO WTIH FOLLOWING SCENARIO
          Amount(inr)
PO    100 + 16.48 ( TAXES-EXCISE ) = 116.48
GR    100 + 12.00 ( TAXES-EXCISE ) = 112
while doing MIRO system should pick the taxes from MIGO.but it is picking from PO.
when we do MIRO with refrence to PO if taxes are overwritten in MIGO the values are picked from MIGO or J1IEX.

Hi manish
Maintain your tax code for MMIV in transaction OBZT.
Also check
Assign the tax code to the company code in the below path...
SPRO>Logistics General>Tax on Goods Movement>India->Basic Setting>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition Based Excise Determination>Assign tax code to company code.
After this run MIRO.
Vishal...
Reward if usefull

Service Tax condition not picking during MIRO

Hi,
Referring earlier posted thread,
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2135441&tstart=0
I want to know insert a Tax Code - VAT for 10% and a Condition Type - Service Tax for 10.3%...
During MIRO, Service Tax Amount is not Picking... Why???
There is any solution for it.....

Hi,
If we create Service condition type, then why need to create Tax code in FTXP and maintain in FV11...
Why both things need to create...??
No need to maintain
check for your service tax condition type
Cond. class A Discount or
Calculat.type A percentage
Cond.category B Delivery co
and you have accrual tick for your condition in t-code M/06
also check in your pricing procedure you have assign account key and accrual key for your condition type in t-code
M/08
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Planed delivery cost- account is not picking in MIRO?

Hi,
Here in pricing procedure even though for the planned delivery costs condition type - account key and account is assigned in obyc & even then the relevant GL is not picking, instead only manual account assigned GL only picked up always kindly let me know the possible causes?
when I create a cost centre based PO with acct assignment category K, the GL which I am assigning in PO only picked up..
kindly let me know the possible causes for the same?
regards,
ARCHU

Hi,
1st one should know where & how account assigned PO will be used.If you used account assigned PO(lts say K), then during GR, you will have account entries
Consumption A/C :Dr
GR/IR Clearing A/C: Cr
During MIRO posting, the GR/IR Clearing A/C as accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing A/C: Dr
Vendor A/C: Cr
Check the link how GL account for a material group is treated, when a purchase order is created with account assigned with material group and all assignment done in OBYC , OMQW & OME9.
http://www.bluemarlinsys.com/ns/0603-03.asp
Regards,
Biju K

How to make zero value deliveries not relevant for billing

Hi,
I have a requirement to not print invoices that have zero as their net value. Right now there is a sales order line category that can have amount on it sometimes and sometimes not. When the amount is 0, is there a way make it not due for billing?
In Item Categories Maintenace I set the Billing Relevant to H:
"H: Delivery-related billing - no zero quantities
You can use this category to avoid items with a value of zero being included in the billing document."
Testing it still includes the items with 0 value for this item category in VF04 - billing due list and creates an invoice for it.
Thanks,
Sergiy

Hello
we will have the copy control routines in the copy control requirements between delivery and billing, check out the transaction VOFM , for example you can have a new copy control routine no 901 in VOFM. via which SAP creates a new program LV60A901 and you can have your code there. Get in touch with your programmer he/she should be knowing how to create this and how to include this in the main program..
Let me know if you need more information
Regards

During MIRO Condition line item not picking against Delivey Note

Hi,
We create a PO with Entry tax condition type. Problem is....
Case 1: - When we are doing MIRO of this PO, Entry tax condition is showing in line item.
Case 2: - When we are doing MIRO against Delivery Note of related PO, Entry tax condition is not showing in line item...Why???
Note: - During testing we found 2 diff. thing for both case..
1. In Case 1 during MIRO, Variance Type showing values (B & A)...
...........B for Material Line Item.
...........A for Condition Line Item.
2. In Case 2 during MIRO, Variance Type showing value only B..
Please guide..

Hi
Check this thread
MIRO - Tax Code
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Service scenario Freight condition value is not pick up in Service entry sh

Hi,
I have done Service PO and assigned freight condition in header level as amount 100 and complete the service PO, then we have done service entry sheet wrt Service PO and check in GRN detail we are not getting the Freight value in as 100 separately.
i am using freight condition as YDFR as delivery cost indicator B assigned.
User required in freight value in GRN and secondly it is comming in Normal GRN its not showing in service.
please suggest me
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
This is clients requirement and we have upgraded in R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 so same thing working in R3 4.7.
so we put freight value as header level in PO and complete the service entry sheet and check the FI doc we didnot get the separate freight amountor not added in also. we get only base value as 1000 not get 100 freight amount. in R3 4.7 it is showing separately
we need this please guide me.
Thanks
Shital

PO,MIGO zero value item, not picking in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for