PO negative test in SRM

HI every body,
can anyone tell me the purpose of PO negative test in SRM & MM
kindly put an eye to give the solution a earliest.
points will be awarded for the best answers soon....
regards
rakhi

Negative testing is to test whether system is behaving correctly for the scenarios which logically are not correct/or against conditions set with customer enhancements.
eg in SRM/MM you build custom conditions via BADI/user exits that you can not create PO directly without SC/PR ref.
then in -ve testing we will specifically test the direct creation of PO from webgui, sapgui and in all sort of possible po creation points.
BR
Dinesh
Edited by: Dinesh Powale on May 29, 2008 11:38 PM

Similar Messages

Error 'Program not registered' while testing RFC - SRM to MDM / TCP/IP conn

Hello All,
While testing RFC connection in SRM, we are getting this error. This connection between SRM to MDM. Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Error Details LOCATION: SAP-Gateway on host <hostname> / sapgw<instance no>
our server OS : windows 2008 server
We are getting error while doing connection test in SRM.
This is sm59 connection (TCP/IP ) connection.
Connection Type: T / RFC destination Name: MDM_API_CATALOG
Registered server program: hostname.MDS
I checked smgw transaction ..Logged on clients...Program id is not showing. Any hint will be helpful.
I Checked this MDM setup also.
MDS setup
In mdm server go to folder F:\usr\sap\DM1\MDS00\config
Open MDM.ini file in notepad
Add the below 2 entries.
SAP RFC Gateways= GWHOST=XXXX.hostnamexxx.xxx GWSERV=sapgw00
Trusted SAP Systems= XXD
This will enable gateway connection between SRM and MDM and will enable trusted connection.
For trusted connections to work, we created a service user called SRM_MDM_API with SAP_ALL in SRM and also created the same user in MDM with Default role.
Error message:
Logon Connection Error
Error Details    Error when opening an RFC connection
Error Details    ERROR: program XXXXXXXXPRD.MDS not registered
Error Details    LOCATION: SAP-Gateway on host XXXXXXXXprd.xx.xxxxxxhostname.xxx / sapgw00
Error Details    DETAIL: TP XXXXXXXXPRD.MDS not registered
Error Details    COMPONENT: SAP-Gateway
Error Details    COUNTER: 77326
Error Details    MODULE: gwr3cpic.c
Error Details    LINE: 1778
Error Details    RETURN CODE: 679
Error Details    SUBRC: 0
Error Details    RELEASE: 700
Error Details    TIME:
Error Details    VERSION: 2
Procedure Tried
1) This procedure is for Linux OS - Similarly we tried in Windows OS ( If any procedure is wrong also, Please correct us)
To register the program login into the OS level as sudo su u2013 <sid>adm and execute the following command.
rfcexec u2013g<program id> -a<gateway host name> -x<gateway service>
rfcexec is the server program name, the <program id> can be obtained from SM59, it is case sensitive and should match with the entry in SM59. The <gateway host name> and <gateway service> can be obtained from the transaction SMGW. When this command is executed it goes to a hanging loop.
The connection will fail once this command is terminated or the user executing this command logs off
2)
To avoid this, instead of using the above mentioned command an entry should be made in the file saprfc.ini
To do this, execute the following command
sudo su u2013 <sid>adm
rfcexec u2013D<destination name>
<destination name> is the RFC destination name in SM59
In order to do above step 2, we could not find saprfc.ini in windows 2008 server. Please let us know path where it will be usually?
3) Already checked the notes sapnote_0000684841
I know that it is generic error..This is happening to specific one of system only.
Thanks
Edited by: saptest2011 on May 20, 2011 5:36 PM

Hello SM,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Thanks for sharing link for document ie Configure the MDM Administration_cockpit. It is helpful. I read that document.
But still issue remain there.
The same RFC connection works between SRM sandbox to MDM sandbox.
Only issue with SRM Prod to MDM Prod (newly built system)
difference between MDM Prod and MDM sandbox.
MDM Prod runs: Windows server 2008 OS
MDM Sandbox runs: Windows server 2003 OS
Landscape: PI7.1, MDM 7.1 and SRM 5.5, SRM-MDM Catalog 3.0
Even i did os01 tcode ping test using host name (specific IP address) from SRM prod to MDM prod, it is fine.
Thanks a lot for your help.
I checked these notes also
Note 353597 - Registering a server program
Note 44844 - No connection to registered RFC program
Note: in smgw tcode in SRM system, the required program id is not showing in logged on clients
Thanks
Edited by: saptest2011 on May 23, 2011 5:00 PM
Edited by: saptest2011 on May 23, 2011 5:39 PM

Wht is Positive and Negative testing?

Hello Gurus,
                I have got a task of doing positive and negative testing for the created program but i have got no idea how to do please can anybody help me out to achieve this task.
I have created a program - ZASDF and TxCode as ZSDF.
Thks

hi,
Positive Testing :: A kind of testing who's aim is to pass the software.In positive testing we put all valid inputs.
       Positive Testing is carried with an idea of checking whether the Application works as per requirements or not. In otherwords, making sure of whether the system does what it should really is intended to do(generally this is a typical developer's attitude)
Negative Testing is trying to make sure that the application "does what it should not and does not what it should"(generally, this is a typical tester's attitude)
        negative testing is   A kind of testing who's aim to fail the software.In nagative testing we put all invalid inputs.
thanks,
raji

Recording Negative Test help

Hi all,
how would I go about recording a negative test with a user that has access to everything, for example.
USER1 does not have access to Tcode MM01, but in order for me to get that authorization error I need to record record tcode mm01 using USER1 (who does not have access to mm01 or Secatt)
What I'm trying to get at here is, I need to record negative test with a USER that has acces to everything.
Any Ideas?
Thanks

Hello,
You need two users , one with authorizaton and other witout .
You need to record the script with both the users and then handle it based on the user input by the tester, which will the input parameter,
If user has authorization then u expect sucess message , if he doesnt then you expect someother message.
Thanks & Best regards,
Ajay

Using eCATT for Negative Test

Hi Everyone,
Would like to check the feasibility of using eCATT for negative test.
e.g. Would like to do a negative test for invoice posting via FB01.
        - Test scenario would be G/L account provided is locked for posting.
        - Would eCATT be able to show this as a 'successful' result so that no investigation is required?
Thanks in advance.
- Jason

Hello Jason
I assume that if you execute FB01 to post against a locked account the system will issue an error message.
If so then you can capture this specific error message using the MESSAGE interface:
MESSAGE.
TCD ( FB01, FB01_1 ).
ENDMESSAGE ( MSG_1 ).
Before executing the transaction I would first check whether the account is indeed locked. Perhaps there is another transaction available for locking the account.
TCD ( xxxx, xxxx_1 ). " Recording to lock G/L account
MESSAGE.
TCD ( FB01, FB01_1 ).
ENDMESSAGE ( MSG_1 ).
In general, if you have a specific negative output that is repeatable than you can use eCATT for testing.
Regards
   Uwe

Negative test of Patch level

Hi Gurus,
I just have started doing negative test of upgraded following patch level. But I am not coming ahead.
Kernel release: 640
Patch Level: 247
Can anybody tell me about the procedure doing negative test of patch level?
Thanks
SIM

Thanks Uday,
As far as I know, it is DB Platform
We have loaded the folowing support packages in system:
EA_APPL 16
EA-IPPE 26
SAP_APPL 31
SAP_ABA 65
SAP_BASIS 65
EA_FINSERV 16
ABA_PLUS 21
Regards
SIM

ECATT testing with SRM 5.0

Can anyone, please send me a document on how to test SRM Functionalities using eCATT?
Thanks in advance,
Ramkumar

Hi Kumar,
There is no way of testing SRM transactions directly using eCATT. eCATT doesn't serve the web based transactions for testing. So you will be required to use Mercury QTP, which is a third party tool very well integrated with SAP.
The SDN forums for eCATT/Mercury are SAP SOLUTION MANAGER, SAP GUI.
Hope this helps you.
PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by rewarding the reply and marking thread Solved.
Regards

[svn] 4068: fix some negative config tests - updates to the error message text

Revision: 4068
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-11 08:37:37 -0800 (Tue, 11 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
fix some negative config tests - updates to the error message text
additional negative test to validate we throw when advanced messaging property access is attempted
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/InvalidBufferPolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/InvalidConflatePolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/frequencies/McfGreaterthanMfTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leOutbound/InvalidBufferPolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leOutbound/InvalidConflatePolicyTest/error.txt
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/readme.txt

Revision: 4068
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-11 08:37:37 -0800 (Tue, 11 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
fix some negative config tests - updates to the error message text
additional negative test to validate we throw when advanced messaging property access is attempted
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/InvalidBufferPolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/InvalidConflatePolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leInbound/frequencies/McfGreaterthanMfTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leOutbound/InvalidBufferPolicyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/throttle/thrott leOutbound/InvalidConflatePolicyTest/error.txt
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/AdaptiveFrequencyTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/FrequencyStepSizeTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/MaxQueueSizeTest/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/messagingService/AdaptiveServerT oClient/readme.txt

Unit Testing approach

Hi,
We had done technical migration of value based roles to derived roles, and facing problem to design the unit testing approach for the same. can you please suggest what must unit testing approach and how to create test cases for authorizations specificaly to derived roles created from value based roles ?
goal is after testing, end users should not feel any changes done in roles approach.
Thanks.
Regards,
Swapnil
<removed_by_moderator>
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Oct 7, 2008 3:40 PM

Hi Swapnil,
The Testing of Security roles need to be taken in a two step approach
Step 1 Unit Testing in DEV
A. Prepare the test cases for each of the derived roles and ensure that your main focus is to see if you are able to execute all the tcodes that have been derived from the parent role with out authorization errors. You also need to verify if each of the derived roles are applicable to those respective Org level Values.
B. Because there will not enough data in DEV ( except In some cases where you have a refresh of fresh PROD data) it is always advisable to do the actual testing of the roles in QA. The goal here is to see if you are able to perform a dry run of all tcodes/Reports/Programs that belong to the roles.
C. You may create fewer Unit test ids as you only assign one ID with one role and once the role is tested you can assign the same ID to another role.
Step 2 Integration Testing in QA
A. Prepare the Integration Test cases for each of the Derived roles. Here most likely the testing will be performed by the end users/Business Analysts in that respective Business Process. Each test case must reflect the possible Org level Authorization Objects and Values that need to be tested.
B. As Integration testing is simulation of actual Production authorizations scenario, care must be taken when creating mulitple Integration test user ids and assigning them right roles and send the ids to the end users to perform the testing in QA.
C. The objective here is that end user must feel comfortable with the test cases and perform both Positive and Negative testing. Testing results must be caputured and documented for any further analysis.
D. In an event of any authorization errors from Integration testing, the authorization errors will be sent to the Security team along with SU53 screenshots. The roles will be corrected in DEV and transported back to QA and the testing continues.
E. Also the main objective of Integration testing would be to check if the transactions are reflecting the right amount of data when executed and any mismatch in the data will be direct implication that the Derived roles do not contain the right Org level values.
Hope this helps you to understand how testing of Security roles (Derived) is done at a high level.
Regards,
Kiran Kandepalli.
Edited by: Kiran Kandepalli on Oct 7, 2008 5:47 AM

BC workset in SRM 7.0 WorkFlow

Hi Gurus,
I'm configuring SRM7.0,when I created S/C or PO,I had documents in Awaiting approval status, all are in awaiting approval by the system and the approval process is automatic. For testing all SRM functionalities and so for time being, I don't want any Approval process for any document .
I activated the BC set /SAPSRM/C_<BO>_600_000_SP04 for S/C as per thraed SRM 7.0 problem with workflow , ...I refreshed or log on ...but still S/C shows in Awaiting Approval status .
Can anyone suggest me , anything need to do further ,so that I can do testing all SRM documents w/o any approval process?
Thanks in advance
Regards
NAP
Edited by: Narendra Patil_111 on Oct 26, 2010 5:14 PM

Hi ,
I performed all settings in Process Controlled WF ->Tech Config (and EV id 3EV_SC_600_000 for main object and BLANK for Process level Schema 3C_SC_600_000 and 3EV_SC_600_000 for Process level Schema 3C_SC_700_002 at Level seq 999) suggested in this thread, and its working now !! Thanks.

Random restarts and freezes. Just upgraded my RAM trying to diagnose new RAM as the problem but they pass Rember test.

Hey so I have been dealing with random reboots and computer freezes since upgrading my RAM. I also reinstalled my 10.8.2 at the same time I upgraded my RAM. I have a Mac Mini Mid 2011 with the OWC Data Doubler Kit and a Crucial M4 128GB Boot drive. My computer reboots every 30 minutes or so and sometimes completely freezes up. I am trying to figure out if the new RAM is the issue as I can send them back. I have ran several Rember RAM tests but the computer freezes mid test so I can not see the issue. All other times it completeles the RAM test with no issues.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Here is my last crash report:
Thu Mar 7 15:34:36 2013
panic(cpu 0 caller 0xffffff8009ab7b95): Kernel trap at 0xffffff8009a76c4e, type 14=page fault, registers:
CR0: 0x000000008001003b, CR2: 0xffffffa00cffad88, CR3: 0x000000000582b00c, CR4: 0x00000000000606e0
RAX: 0x0000000000000000, RBX: 0xffffff800d17f488, RCX: 0x0000000000000000, RDX: 0xffffff800a0bd430
RSP: 0xffffff80fa013d10, RBP: 0xffffff80fa013d60, RSI: 0x0000000000000000, RDI: 0xffffff800d17f488
R8: 0xfffffffffffff000, R9: 0xffffff801b50b5d0, R10: 0x000000010ccc3000, R11: 0x0000000000000200
R12: 0xffffffa00cffad78, R13: 0x000000000000007d, R14: 0x0000000000000000, R15: 0x0000000000000000
RFL: 0x0000000000010293, RIP: 0xffffff8009a76c4e, CS: 0x0000000000000008, SS: 0x0000000000000010
Fault CR2: 0xffffffa00cffad88, Error code: 0x0000000000000000, Fault CPU: 0x0
Backtrace (CPU 0), Frame : Return Address
0xffffff80fa0139b0 : 0xffffff8009a1d5f6
0xffffff80fa013a20 : 0xffffff8009ab7b95
0xffffff80fa013bf0 : 0xffffff8009ace4ad
0xffffff80fa013c10 : 0xffffff8009a76c4e
0xffffff80fa013d60 : 0xffffff8009a7be07
0xffffff80fa013d90 : 0xffffff8009a75cf4
0xffffff80fa013dc0 : 0xffffff8009a75150
0xffffff80fa013e00 : 0xffffff8009a66b2c
0xffffff80fa013ef0 : 0xffffff8009a6a890
0xffffff80fa013f20 : 0xffffff8009db8d66
0xffffff80fa013f50 : 0xffffff8009de17da
0xffffff80fa013fb0 : 0xffffff8009acecf3
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: syslogd
Mac OS version:
12A269
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 12.0.0: Sun Jun 24 23:00:16 PDT 2012; root:xnu-2050.7.9~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Kernel UUID: 8D5F8EF3-9D12-384B-8070-EF2A49C45D24
Kernel slide:     0x0000000009800000
Kernel text base: 0xffffff8009a00000
System model name: Macmini5,1 (Mac-8ED6AF5B48C039E1)
System uptime in nanoseconds: 151583130298
last loaded kext at 11211562865: com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor          1.9.5d0 (addr 0xffffff7f8b414000, size 28672)
loaded kexts:
com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor          1.9.5d0
com.apple.driver.AudioAUUC          1.60
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager          4.0.9f8
com.apple.filesystems.autofs          3.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient          3.5.10
com.apple.iokit.IOUserEthernet          1.0.0d1
com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyHIDDriver          122
com.apple.driver.AppleMCCSControl          1.0.33
com.apple.driver.AppleHDAHardwareConfigDriver          2.3.0f2
com.apple.driver.AppleTyMCEDriver          1.0.2d2
com.apple.driver.ApplePlatformEnabler          2.0.5d4
com.apple.driver.AGPM          100.12.69
com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyDriver          2.3.0f2
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelHD3000Graphics          8.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothUSBDFU          4.0.9f8
com.apple.driver.AppleHDA          2.3.0f2
com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X          7.0.0
com.apple.iokit.BroadcomBluetoothHCIControllerUSBTransport          4.0.9f8
com.apple.driver.AppleSMCPDRC          1.0.0
com.apple.iokit.AppleBCM5701Ethernet          3.2.5b3
com.apple.driver.AppleMuxControl          3.2.6
com.apple.driver.ApplePolicyControl          3.2.6
com.apple.driver.AirPort.Brcm4331          600.15.20
com.apple.driver.AppleLPC          1.6.0
com.apple.driver.ACPI_SMC_PlatformPlugin          1.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelSNBGraphicsFB          8.0.0
com.apple.iokit.SCSITaskUserClient          3.5.1
com.apple.driver.AppleIRController          320.15
com.apple.driver.AppleFileSystemDriver          3.0.1
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeDataless          1.0.0d1
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib          1.0.0d1
com.apple.BootCache          34
com.apple.driver.XsanFilter          404
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage          2.2.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub          5.1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleFWOHCI          4.9.5
com.apple.driver.AppleSDXC          1.2.2
com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort          2.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI          5.1.5
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBUHCI          5.1.5
com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM          1.6.1
com.apple.driver.AppleHPET          1.7
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons          1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleRTC          1.5
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS          1.9
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC          1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC          1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient          196.0.0
com.apple.nke.applicationfirewall          4.0.39
com.apple.security.quarantine          2
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement          196.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily          10.0.6
com.apple.kext.triggers          1.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSurface          86.0.2
com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib          2.3.0f2
com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily          1.8.9fc9
com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib          1.6
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily          4.0.9f8
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController          1.0.10d0
com.apple.iokit.AppleBluetoothHCIControllerUSBTransport          4.0.9f8
com.apple.iokit.IOEthernetAVBController          1.0.2b1
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireIP          2.2.5
com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController          2.3.0f2
com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily          2.3.0f2
com.apple.driver.AppleBacklightExpert          1.0.4
com.apple.driver.AppleGraphicsControl          3.2.6
com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport          2.3.4
com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family          500.15
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily          3.0
com.apple.driver.AppleSMC          3.1.3d11
com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginLegacy          1.0.0
com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily          5.2.0d16
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusPCI          1.0.10d0
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltEDMSink          1.1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltEDMSource          1.1.8
com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily          2.3.4
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPOutAdapter          1.8.5
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPInAdapter          1.8.5
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPAdapterFamily          1.8.5
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltPCIDownAdapter          1.2.5
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice          3.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass          3.5.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily          3.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver          5.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite          5.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient          5.0.0
com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltNHI          1.6.0
com.apple.iokit.IOThunderboltFamily          2.0.3
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireFamily          4.5.5
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily          2.2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily          5.1.6
com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily          1.8.0
com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime          1.6.1
com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily          1.1
com.apple.security.sandbox          220
com.apple.kext.AppleMatch          1.0.0d1
com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet          7
com.apple.driver.DiskImages          344
com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily          1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleKeyStore          28.18
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform          1.6
com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily          2.7
com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily          1.4
com.apple.kec.corecrypto          1.0

Reinstall the original memory and see whether there's any improvement. Be careful not to touch the gold contacts on the memory modules when handling them. If necessary, clean them with a mild solvent such as rubbing alcohol.
The Apple Hardware Test, though generally unreliable, will sometimes detect a fault. A negative test can't be depended on. Run the extended version of the test.

Idoc Error Message 51 is shown in sw37 but not in idoc Testing

Hi Experts,
I have one problem with Idoc processing, below is the scenario.
The Idoc IDDEK12K is posting from SAP XI with NFS file path details. The Idoc should fail if the file is not formatted properly like if it is missing the trailer record. This is happening in the IDDEK22K,
It appears that all files are processing successfully when expected. However, when I do a negative test (where I expect it to fail), SM37 shows that it failed yet the IDoc is still successful. I expect to see the trigger IDoc as failed, and the WEINBQUEUE should include an entry for IDDEK12K.
can any body tell me what could be the problem. do i need to change the code in FM, but that FM is used by the IDDEK22K and IDOC IDDEK22K is working fine for both + and - test.
Any help is appreciated and rewarded.
regards.

HI Jegathees,
First check in R/3 system it is delivered scucessfully or not in WE02 Tr. Code.
If it is not reached the PI then goto tr code SM58 find is there any error information.
And also check the SMQ1 and SMQ2 , may be it will stucked in this.
Check the RFC destination, Port and Partner profile before sending the Idoc to the PI system.
Regards
Goli Sridhar

Check list for testing

Hello everyone,
I am trying to put a document together to have a check list for integration testing. does anybody have anything like this that can share? Or any tips of what steps should be taken in consideration to complete integration testing?
Thank you for your help!

Hi,
1) Integration testing validate end to end business scenarios including interfaces. Use converted data (if applicable and based on the data strategy). Can be executed in multiple cycles based on the implementation strategy
2) Scenario-based testing across process areas
May include multiple t-codes, or equivalent units in a string or sequence
3) Testing across modules
4) Primarily deals with cross-application chains that directly or potentially impact each other
5) Consists mostly of positive testing with selected negative testing
6) Executed in the Quality Assurance test environment
7) Integration Testing will be performed in multiple cycles
8) Next cycle should not begin if critical discrepancies have not been dispositioned. All Integration test discrepancies must be closed by the end of the last integration test cycle
9) A discrepancy can be dispositioned if:
Retest Passes or
Workaround approved or
Alternate resolution approved
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Advice needed for functional test

My company is releasing a new website with all the bells and whistles. I am looking for advice on specifically what we should test. I know that we want to make sure that the site functionally works, but different people on the team have opinions on what should be tested beyond that. Some people want to check that the pages are exactly the same from run to run, others just want to check text. I would like to see what test teams outside my company are actually doing. Any ideas would be appreciated.

Hello FiveNines,
You don't give a lot of information about your application, so it is hard to give you specific advice...I was at a very interesting IIST seminar last week in Boston and I walked away with 2 major take aways:
1) Negative testing is as important as positive testing. As development typically focuses on positive testing, it's critical for QA to have good test plans in place for this. Most of the QA teams on the room had a 20% negative testing to 80% positive or functional testing, but the goal should be to target more a 50%-50% ratio, if no higher negative testing than positive.
2) When you think about building your Negative testing Test Cases think about 2 areas:
* Invalid data input (like if you expect an integer value, try typing letters., etc, or enter an invalid user account to make sure the application behaves properly, etc)
*More importantly, think about failing pre-conditions. For example, if your application connects to a DB on the back, build test cases to see how your application will handle processing a new user when the DB is down...This really open up my eyes, as when we build our test cases we usually don't think about this type of scenario, and we have been focusing a lot on functionality testing...
I hope it helps

HR Tasks in SRM UWL

Hello -
We use 2 separate UWL for MSS and SRM -
In SRM we have a test id and assigned the test id SRM UWL (pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/specialist/com.sap.pct.srm.srm70/com.sap.pct.srm.com.fl_common/com.sap.pct.srm.com.fl_iviews/com.sap.pct.srm.com.iv_inbox), which uses com.sap.pct.srm.core.xml. Similarly same test id is available in ECC and corresponding MSS UWL is assigned to the Portal User. ie pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/line_manager/com.sap.pct.erp.mss.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.mss.iviews/com.sap.pct.erp.mss.uwl and xml com.sap.pct.erp.mss.001.xml.
During testing, we found that HR tasks are being displayed in the "SRM UWL".
We use 2 separate UWL's, one for HR and one for SRM and assumption was the tasks for each would not cross into the other.
I verified the SRM, MSS XMLs and Item Types are unique in the respective XMLs.
Why are HR tasks shown up in SRM UWL - is it because of same user? How can we restrict HR Tasks not shown up in SRM UWL.
Many Thanks.

Why are HR tasks shown up in SRM UWL - is it because of same user? How can we restrict HR Tasks not shown up in SRM UWL.
Yes - Since all the tasks belong to the same user, every thing will show up unless you have configured otherwise.
You could play with your XML configuration files and UWL iview properties to separate the items to two different UWL iviews.
The easiest way would be the following:
There is a parameter called "User Roles" which can be configured while creating a UWL system.
Then this UWL system will only be used for the configured roles. Set this property for your UWL systems with the roles as per your requirement and you should be good to go.
Have a look at the following wiki also:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/TechTSG/(UWL)Role-based+versioning
However, remember that the whole purpose of Universal Work List is to provide a unified view of all the workflow tasks for a given user (from all the backend systems).
Hope that helps !!
Thanks,
Shanti

PO negative test in SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for