PO no. field is mandatory PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Reques

Hi Guyas
whenever an advance is to be released against a
PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Request through t. code F-47.
Right now, PO no. field is not mandatory & system allows users to create
a down payment request due to which same cost isn't getting reflected in
the project structure report as well as in the PO history.
Please help me
JK

Hi,
I got your issue.
You are trying to create a down payment request for an asset PO.
As a standard behaviour of the system, it always allows you to create down payment requests without PO reference also.
If you make the field status mandatory for the PO number field for field status group used in your alternative recon GL account of vendors, then you cannot create further down payment requests without a PO reference.
One more issue is that, if you do a down payment req for a asset PO, then the asset used in that PO will be capitalised also during F-48, if u do F-48 with reference to F-47 DP request. But most the companies does not want the asset to be capitalised at the Down payment level.
So i have a solution to fix this issue. Which will post down pay req and down payments as like for normal POs.
First find the field status groups, which are used in your alternative recon accounts of spl GL indicator F and A.
Then go to OBC4, and choose those field status groups and go to asset accounting part and supress and fields ASSET NO and Sub number.
Then go to OBA5, enter message class as F5 and enter
There add an entry for message number 378 and change the message type as W.
Now do F-47. It will now be posted as like normal POs only. And the F-48 also will be fine.
This will completely resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu
SRB_ASSETPO

Similar Messages

Purchase register query based on down payment invoice

Hai All,
I am creating an invoice based on purchase order.The vat tax is being calculated in the downpayment. I want the vat to be displayed in the downpayment invoice as well as the a/p invoice but i m not getting it in the a/p invoice. Pls guide me with the linking of tables to get the query working. I have formatted the fields req but could not link the tables...Pls guide me with that...
Thanks & Regards,
Neela

Hi Neela,
Check the thread.
Re: Purchase register query based on down payment invoice
FROM PCH1 T0
INNER JOIN OPCH T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
INNER JOIN OSLP T2 ON T0.SlpCode = T2.SlpCode
LEFT OUTER JOIN PCH12 T3 ON T1.DocEntry = T3.DocEntry
LEFT JOIN ODPI T4 ON T1.CardCode = T4.CardCode
INNER JOIN DPO1 T5 ON T0.ItemCode = T5.ItemCode
Close the thread, if issue solved.
Regards,
Madhan.

Imported po has been done and down payment made last F.Y and now want cance

Please help me for below scenario.
Our client was created Imported PO and down payment made in last F.Y and now some reasons they want to cancel the PO and create new domestic PO with same PR.
But down payment was cleared and accounts are audited they don't want to reversal the down payment.
How it is possible to cancel the PO without reversal of down payment.
and i reversed the DPR remain down payment is same and tried to cancel the PO line item but it is showing below error.
Diagnosis
You have attempted to delete or block an item that is not yet closed.
An item is regarded as closed if:
o no GR blocked stocks exist
o all down (advance) payments made to date have been taken into
account
o the quantity delivered is the same as the quantity invoiced
o all delivery costs have been taken into account
o the quantity delivered is the same as the quantity issued (only in
the case of stock transport orders).
Please provide me the posible solutions urgently.
Best Regards
Ranganadh

Dear Ranganadh,
For closing/ cancelling the PO, main prerequisite is "There should be no open transactions against that line item."
So unless you reverse/ cancel the downpayment, you can not delete the line in PO
Umakanth R

Down payment based on the purchase order

i raise one purchase order 1000 Rs in t code me21n after popup with number. based on purchase order i pay advance amount 500 Rs with reference of purchase order number (in f-48 i have given number reference field). when i saw the purchase oder (me21n) in status tab down payments fields not updated like purchase order 1000 only and down payment 0 only the system showing.

Hi
In F-48 enter the input parameters and when you click enter it takes you to next screen. here you would enter the amount for 2nd line item. It is here you would enter the Purchase doc field.
If the same is not visible, then check the field status for the GL field status group in OBC4 and also posting key field status in OB41
Thank You,

Invoice Purchase Order with Down Payments brings wrong Due Amount

Hello,
I am working on 8.81 PL08 environment and I have this situation:
I issue a Purchase Order and then a Down Payment Request which I pay. When I go to invoice the purchase order the down payment and payment due fields on the invoice are correct.
In the case I issue another down payment request and for the same Purchase Order which closes the amount of invoice then when I go to the invoice and choose Copy From the same fields are not right.
If I go to Purchase Order and choose Copy To the amounts are correct.
So the situation is like this:
- Down Payment part of Purchase Order. Due Payment to invoice correct
- Down Payment full amount of Purchase Order. Choose Copy To from Purchase Order to Purchase Invoice. Due Payment correct.
- Down Payment full amount of Purchase Order. Choose Copy From from Purchase Invoice. Due Payment wrong.
Has anyone seen this before?
Thank you,
Gerasimos

Thank you Gordon,
However I cannot deny to the user that wants to apply that that there is a business case where the vendor demands the invoice to be paid all in front (maybe one installment with the Purchase Order and one with the Receipt of the Goods). So, I would expect this to be covered.
I noticed another thing: When I opened the Down Payments screen on Invoice (where Down Payments are listed in order to choose them) there is a column "Open Net Amount" which brings the correct amount. However, in the column "Net Amount to Draw" there is a wrong figure and that makes the mistake.
Now I can see that I can wright the correct amount to column "Net Amount to Draw" but still I cannot understand why a user should do that.

Dimension 1 Cost centre field is not able to edit in Incoming payment for Down payment Request

Hi Exports,
I am facing an issue on selecting Cost centres in Incoming payment screen.
Issue: While I am booking the payment entry for Down payment request, I am not able to select first Dimension cost centre in Incoming payment rows for down payment request document, the Second dimension is able to select and update. the field is in non-editable mode (only on specific document row)
Setup:
1. Two Dimension are enabled
2. In Separate Columns - Both Cost Centres are in separate column
The above issue is only for Down payment request, for other documents (Invoice) I am able to select and update cost centre
Please find below snap shot for reference
Kindly check and let me know the solution
Regards,
Kiran

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes agree, The Down Payment request is not a financial document but the Cost centres are able to select in Down payment request rows, no issue at all in this case.
In Incoming payment screen it is necessary to select Cost centres because it has financial implication using down payment request with related to currency difference or Bank charges (both are Expense accounts) and DR assignment is mandatory in this case.
And you have to notice one thing in above issue, I am able to select second dimension cost centre and it is allowing to edit and update the cost centre on respective row. Only issue is specific cell (dimension 1 cost centre) is not able to edit.
Even I am not able to process payment entry without selection of Cost Centre on first dimension, the system is blocking and displaying the error message "DR Assignment is mandatory on Dimension 1 for specific account"
Looks like bug, please clarify
SBO version: 9.0 PL 11
Regards,
Kiran

Additional validation for one of the fields in down payment request

Hi All ,
I have a requirement for doing some additional validation for one of the fields in down payment request
(F-47) .
I need to validate a field u2018Assignmentu2019 in the down payment request .
Here, assignment field is mandatory and user has to enter a valid contract number. Then we have to validate the contract number entered against the tracking number field (BEDNR) in EKPO table corresponding to the vendor.
If the contract number entered is incorrect, then system displays a message with the valid contract number. The user can modify the assignment field with this contract number. Once the field is modified, system once again validates whether the contract number entered is valid.
Can you please provide me your valuable inputs how to achieve this.
Regards,
Tripti.

Hi Vishal ,
Thanks for your reply. I tried searching for them but couldn't find any.
Regards,
Tripti.

WBS & Commitment Code Update in Purchase Order/Down Payment

Sir,
We have created purchase orders by using WBS and Commitment Code and
afterwards, the down payments has been created against the purchase
Orders.
Now we want to change the WBS and Commitment Code in Purchase Orders
and also in Down Payment Request so that the data and reports can be
updated as per the changes.
Pl suggest the way how can we do the same so that our data can be
updated as per the changes in purchase orders.
Regards
Mudit Gupta

Why do you want to change the same now?Has the user entered wrong WBS and Commitment Code?
I yes then cancel the down payment,delete the po & pr...and then through CJ20N create a new automatic pr with correct WBS and Commitment Code.
Regards,
Indranil

Error message in down payment on asset purchase order

Hello,,
While i am trying to make down payment request with reference to PO have asset number it is return an error message
*Store a cost element for credit down payments
    Message no. KI165
Diagnosis
    You posted a payment to a CO-relevant object (cost center, order, and so
    on). The payment is therefore recorded in CO.
    If a payment has no order reference, no consumption account can be
    derived. Therefore, CO posts the payment under a default cost element
    created and stored during Customizing.
    You have not yet maintained this default in the system.
Procedure
    Maintain the default cost and revenue elements in the Implementation
    Guide under "Project System" for controlling area CA00.*
I don`t know what is the reason for using this cost element and which type of cost elements that i can use in this issue....
We are not use Down payment clearing account, because Our customer don`t need this account..
Please help me ASAP
Thanks for your cooperation
Hussein

Hello Hussein,
For error message KI165,please maintanin default cost element in OKEP.Down payments have to be posted in CO with cost   elements. In case of purchase orders (or open items in CO), the cost element for consumption can be derived from the purchase order. Thus the down payment in CO is posted with the consumption cost element.
If the down payment does not have any reference to a purchase order, then the cost element for which the consumption will be posted is not known. In this case, the cost element maintained with OKEP is used.
The error message KI165 will occur if no cost element is maintained with OKEP - not regarding whether the actual down payment has a reference to a purchase order and thus will update in CO under the consumption cost element derived from the purchase order. This is always a source of misunderstanding - but I hope it is clear now.
OKEP configuration is absolutely necessary if you do not have a cost element assigned at the time of downpayment request creation.
If after maintaining the default cost element you get some other error then please note that you would need to check the following :
1.Compare the configuration settings for the GL accounts that are used for posting the cash call in EHP4 system with the system without the EHP4 support pack.
2.Check the controlling area settings in both the systems.
Regards Bernhard

WBS field not appearing in the down payment document posted via FBA7/F-48

i have created several down payment docs wrt PO, acct assignment WBS, but none seems to populate the WBSE field in the payment document, when using FBA7/F-48. All the down payment documents appear in the PO (Purchase order history) but only those which have been paid through F110 populates WBSE and the ones paid through FBA7 does not populate WBSE field. We are clear that the down payment documents are posted rightly w.r.t PO but its just that they dont get linked to the WBSE when FBA7 is used and gets linked when F110 is used. Please suggest if am missing any config setting. i already raised this in PS Forum but it now seems more of FI.
/thread/1791429 [original link is broken]

Hi,
please check whether the feild status of your document types KZ, KA and KG are having the status for WBS Elements as optional or hidded
Best Regards,
Ravi Reddy

Down Payment Request F-47 and Purchase Order reference

When creating a Down Payment Request using F-47, is there a way to reference to a Purchase Order number without indicating a line item? It is my client's business practice to make a down payment for the whole PO, not just for a particular line item. Is there a configuration setting that needs to be done to cater to this requirement?
Thanks.

It all depends on how you want to use it to clear invoices down.
You could put the PO number in the text line of the down payment.
You do not need to put in the line item so it meets one of their requirements.
The problem then comes how is that PO number used to clear the actual invoices.
If it is acceptable to clear manually this can be done, however it all depends on how many line items a Vendor will have open at a time for the same PO. If scheduled Agreements were used, you may find that there could be 1000 or so open items at a single time.
Hope this helps in some way, in essecence you need to be creative.
Please award points if useful.

Down Payment from Purchase order

Is it possible to create a down payment document automatically for a particular vendor when the PO or PR is created.Is there any vendor specific settings that has to be done

Hi,
No, there´s no automatic way of doing it. You can read the payment process flow in:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/fr/6e/12180a9f0411d189b80000e829fbbd/content.htm
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

"Free of Charge" field mandatory on Purchase order document

Hello,
Where can I set and de-select the "free of charge" field as mandatory in SAP MM for Purchase orders?
I am working around SPRO -> Material Managment -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Define screen Layout at document level, but there I cannot find any fields like that.
Also in the account assignment layout or in the Item type layout I cannot find anything useful.
Do you know how this field is set as mandatory?
In particular I have a document type that have that flag mandatory when I post a standard item (either with a stock or non-stock material). When I use a different document type or even the same with item category = services, the system is not requiring the "free of charge" as mandatory.
Thanks
Marco

Hello,
As I described, I am using a standard Item category (PSTYP = 0), either with a stock material or with a material group code + account assignment (Cost center).
Either way (stock or non stock) the message is raised.
Working around it, I noticed that the error is showing for that particular layout only (assigned to the document type, but it is not showing if I select the same document type (same layout at document level), but with PSTYP = 9 (services).
It is showing both when creating (ME21N or ME21) and when changing (ME22N).
Hence there must be something wrong at SPRO -> Material Managment -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> define document layout at document level with the match of ME21N, AKTH, ZM (my layout) and PT0F, becouse for ME21N, AKTH, ZM and PT9F or ME21N, AKTH, XX (any other user defined layout) and PT0F evertything is correct.
I even tryed to remove and recreate all over again the ZM user defined layout, but the same error is showing.
The problem is that I am not able to indentify where is actually this "free of charge" field in this customizing path, since I don't see it in the list of selectable fields.
Thanks
Marco

Making a field mandatory in purchase order wrt account assignment

Hi,
I want to make a field mandatory in purchase order wrt a patricular account assignment category.Can any one of u help me?

Hi
Using a BAdi you can acheive this.
Create a New Field selction key with Order Acknowledgement as mandatory field
The Business Add-In (BAdI) ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST enables you to extend the business logic of the Enjoy purchase order on an individual basis.
Typical applications for this BAdI include:
Processing of own objects
Processing of additional data on standard objects
Implementation of additional checks and derivations
Change of data in standard fields
Change in field selection
Use one of the the methods
Field selection At item level method FIELDSELECTION_ITEM_REFKEYS
Special rules at item level method FIELDSELECTION_ITEM
This method enables you to change the display properties of fields at item level by supplementing or swapping the field selection reference key. You can thus restrict the processing options for certain groups of users, for example.
The following parameters are available:
IM_ITEM
This import parameter contains the item data of the outline agreement.
The interface reference is of the category IF_PURCHASE_OUT_ITEM.
CH_KEY0 to CH_KEY6
These change parameters contain the field selection reference keys.
Please go through the BAdi Document tation for more details
Please take hepl of ABAP er in implementing the BAdi
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Field Status Group influence when Purchase Requisition being created

Hi!
I have a requirement from a client regarding the influence of the Field Status Group on Purchasing Documents.
A Filed Status Group has been created in which has the CO/PP order set as Required entry for the Account Assignment.
This Group was then assigned to a GL Account.
When a Goods Receipt (MIGO) against a Purchase Order is entered for a GL which requires an Internal Order, the standard error message "Field Order is a required field for G/L account 0010 4105000100 " (message # F5808) appears if the Account Assignment on the PO is incorrect & no Internal Order has been entered.
This is fine & is how the system operates as standard.
However, the requirement from my client is to make this error message appear when a Purchase Requisition is being entered on the system, before it is converted to a PO & then receipted.
They believe that calling the message at the point of GR is too late in the process.
Could anyone advise on any possible BAPI, etc which could help us with this requirement??
Thanks,
k

I have gone to the Tcode which has been given,
In the first field , I have given the company code,
in the second field , I have given call Plant (0002)
Validation ......how do i give the validation please let me know
With Regards,

PO no. field is mandatory PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Reques

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for