PO & non-PO based invoices

Hi Gurus',
How can I get the list of PO and non-PO based invoices, whose payment proposal has not run yet.
Thanks & Regards,
VK

Hi,
Normally, it means open items; you can use FBL1N report for example.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Invoice Posting using INVOIC02 Idoc for PO and Non-Po based invoices

Hi All,
We have a problem regarding posting Invoices using Idocs.
We have po and non-po invoices coming frm thirdparty in the form of idoc files.
We need a clarification whether Invoic02 idoc can handle both Po and Non Po Based invoices or threre are seperate idoc types or message types for Po and Non Po Invoices.
Could any one give some inputs on Partner Profiles also for this senario.
Please kindly reply as early as possible.
Regards
Anil Kumar K

Hi
I Got your name from this site.I would be very thankful if you can help me here.I am designing a EDI based invoice LIV.Is it possible to post some charges which are without PO reference but are coming in Vendor Invoices.Is it possible to post these kind of charges with EDI message INOIC01 or we have to post through FI posting.If possible through EDI in which segment of IDOC we will enter these charges with amt.Also is it possible to post credit memo also with EDI
Thanks
Sanjeev

Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice

hi,
how to do Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice.

Hi Praveen,
You cannot create a Invoice without reference to PO through MIRO,
You can create a Invoice witout reference to PO throughj FB60 where you can enter the vendor of your choice.
Cheers
Chris

To Identify right IDOC for Non PO based Invoice posting

Hi,
Business requirement is to post a non PO inbound invoice which is available in the flat file to a SAP system using IDoc.
The Idoc Should post the G/L & Cost center detail available in Flat file in to SAP system.
No automatic assignment of cost center with G/L account is required.
So we want to know a IDoc which SAP recommends/or should be used for the process with the matching process type.
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Upender

Hi,
Have you considered ACLPAY01 ?
Regards,
Anand Mandalika.

Activation of standars workflow for Non PO based Invoices

Hi All,
Please advise me with the following at earliest.
I have activated the standard workflow for the transaction FV60, so that the work item will be generated in the approver inbox for the release amount. I have done the settings, but iam stuck up at the transaction OBWF, it says to assign the users to the position or the organizational unit. I have created the Posistion in transaction code PO13 (Posistion in Business work flow), could you please let me know how to assign users to this position.

Hi,
For setting the organization object for each level using OBWF transaction, you have to select the entry in transaction OBWF (in which the WF Variant + Approval Path + Level+Amount will decide which agent to pick) and choose button "Details (OrgObject)".
Then in new window
1. choose button "Org object" of create (2nd button on tool bar) if already the org object is created and you just want to link. Then select JOB/Position/Organizational unit for which you want a linking. Then choose the org element by using the Search Term window. This will create the link for the level for which you wanted the user/user-group.
2. Choose button "Create org. unit" to create new org unit like Job or Position and then complete linking as specified in point -1.
You can test this by executing the function moudule "PRELIMINARY_POSTING_ACTOR1_DET" which is in the standard agent rule '00000139' which is linked to the standard task TS00007914.
Hope this will help you, but aswer for this is very late.
Regards,
Manju

GR Reversal for Non GR based invoce Purchase order

Hi Experts
I have a query on standard SAP behavior
I create a PO with GR indicator checked IR indicator checked but GR based IV indicator not checked
this is a PO with Non GR based invoice
Now I create Invoice for full PO qty, the made GR for full qty and Invoice has been released for payment ( No blocks)
Now I am reversing the invoice. During this reversal if the system throws an error or warning saying Invoice exists for PO.
Please clarify
Regards
Kamalakkannan

>
Kamalakkannan Kandasamy wrote:
> Hi Experts
>
> I have a query on standard SAP behavior
>
> I create a PO with GR indicator checked IR indicator checked but GR based IV indicator not checked
>
> this is a PO with Non GR based invoice
>
> Now I create Invoice for full PO qty, the made GR for full qty and Invoice has been released for payment ( No blocks)
>
> Now I am reversing the invoice. During this reversal if the system throws an error or warning saying Invoice exists for PO.
>
> Please clarify
>
> Regards
>
> Kamalakkannan
The question is not clear, is the system throwing a message at you. Seems like you have completed the cycle, and now you are reversing the invoice, that should not cause any messages coming up, unless you make a mistake in reversing

GR Based invoice tick to be made done after goods receipt

Hai,
I need a way to do mass updation of GR Based Invoice tick in PO in which goods is already received.
Some of POs released without this tick and migo is already done. but now I want to tick that check box
but in system it is in non editable mode.
regards
Madhu.

Hi, Madhu,
I had the same problem. This field becomes readonly when a good receipt or an invoice is booked. Mass maintenance, LSMW and CATT do not help. But you can use SE16N to set (X) the EKPO-WEBRE field and the goods receipts and the invoices take it into consideration as it was set in the first place.
Now, running SE16N for a few items it's ok, but if you have thousands of items to modify it becomes out-of-hand. I tried a LSMW on SE16N, unfortunately with no success. Then I tried a Windows program to record the keyboard and mouse actions combined with a tab delimited text file with PO number and PO item and, voila, I have 33000 items modified. The program I used is AutoIt, but there are many free programs doing the same thing.
Three notes:
1. Use it on your own risk. SAP Note 457511(FAQ: Purchase order change and goods receipt in purchasing) warns: It inevitably leads to follow-on errors because of mutual field relationships.
2. SE16N it's not a good place to fool around.
3. In this way you use SE16N online, so it takes A LOT of time.
Hope it helps,
George
Edited by: George Palaghean on Dec 14, 2009 12:34 PM

Goods-receipt-based invoice verification default for material group

Hello experts,
I put by default the option Goods-receipt-based invoice verification when creating a purchase order by tcode ME21N. Now, I would like if possible to only insert the option Goods-receipt-based invoice verification by default for some material group. Is this possible? This behaviour needs to be automatic.
How can I achieve this behaviour?
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
JP
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 20, 2011 11:11 PM

Dear JP,
In standard system this is not possible to default this indicator based on Material Group. This can be defaulted from Vendor Master record or Purchasing Info Record or Ticked Manually PO Item Details.
If you look to enhance you system to do this, I would not advisable you to go with this default option because there can be situation that you order some material without Material Master Record (Like a frame work Order) in that case you will not be able to do GR and there can be conflict.
You can create Material Group Info. record and default it from there, but again this for scenario where Material Master Record does not exists(Non Stock).
Hope you find this useful.
Regards,
Reetesh

Control on non service based IV

Good Day Gurus!
We have POs with Item Cat D which are non service-based IV since we are not using service master/entry.
During ammendment of service line, PO line item amount can be decreased since entry of negative value in service lines is allowed which makes PO line item amount in some cases, less than invoiced amount.
Is there a standard functionality to control this or should it be addressed via business process(credit memo, etc.). Thanks!

Hi,
The Invoice is not the basis for the PO values to be updated; the
system provides the flexibility of invoicing higher than the PO value.
The invoices raised however can be seen in the PO. Currently there are
no plans to change this functionality as it is a part of the core, any
change here could affect existing functionality of other users.
For your particular case a possible way is to set up a 3 way match with
the GR non evaluated flag checked. This way the actual value is
validated and the system would not allow the value to be changed
below the actual value.
The process followed for a 2 way match differs from that of a 3 way
match. The 3 way match process updates the PO based on the GR document.
The system does not take the invoice document to update the PO, as it is
possible to create an invoice for any amount. Due to this the program
is not designed update the actual value in the PO to reflect the
expensed amount.
This design is a part of the standard; there are no plans to change this
design. There is no possible solution to validate the 2
way match process as the invoice cannot be the basis to update the PO.
Please also refer the attached note 457511 regarding PO changes.
Regards,
Edit

Error Message Posting a Non-PO Vendor Invoice

The instance is ECC 6.0.
While trying to post a non-PO vendor invoice, I am getting the below error message:
"RKEAK-FIELD(12) is not an input field
Parked document could not be posted 00 S 347 RKEAK-FIELD"
Does anyone ever bumped into the same error message or have an idea what is generating the error?
The issue started happening after one of the accounts in posting (Vendor Discounts) which is a CE was changed to post to Profitability Segment in OKB9. This error was not faced earlier when the account was posting to Cost Centers.
We are using new GL and Doc Splitting functionality.

Thanks for your reply.
I checked the note and it says the affected release are 3.0 D to 3.1G. But we are on ECC 6.0. Moreover, as per the note this is an issue with Tcode FB01, but I am using tcode FB60 for creating the non-PO invoice...
Please let me know your thoughts...

EDI - Incoming Invoice Error and GR based Invoice Verification - 51 No GR

Hi,
We are implementing EDI for incoming invoices and use Goods Receipts based Invoice Verification. When processing an inbound IDOC Invoice (type INVOIC01) where the Goods Receipt has not yet been posted, then Inbound IDOC is siiting at Error Status, 51 - No GR documents found.
Is there any way we can process this as a Parked Invoice or for Verification in the background (MIRA)? because the current situation is a problem, as 95% of our Inbound Invoices will be received electronically before the Goods are Received.
The actual Vendor's delivery note is stored in the segment E1EDP02 (Qualifier 016), field BELNR.
Currently the IDOC as to sit in error until the Vendor's Delivery Note is Goods Receipted which can be several days later - SAP OSS Note 393883 fro 2001 suggests doing this, but surely this is a common situation. The IDOC sitting in error in WE02 in the list of IDOCs is difficult to isolate from true errors.
If this is was mnaul Invoice it could be processed through MIRA for background Invoice Verification later with program RMBABG00.
We havd SAP version ECC 6.0
I have spotted OSS Note 501524 which implies that is possible automatically Park Incoming EDI IDOC Invoices, has anyone tried this? and what would be the transaction/program that could be used to post several at once when the GR has been processed (similar to RMBABG00)

Hi ,
You can use the program RBDMANI2 which will reprocess all the IDOCs (EDIinvoices )that have failed . You can schedule this program in the background and it will post all failed invoices which have the GR posted later .
We had the same scenario and we have scheduled this program as a daily job at night .
Regards,
Hari.

PO based Invoice posting

Hi ,
How do I do PO based invoice posting . I have always done GR based Invoice verification . But I have a scenario where the vendor wants to do invoice before GRN . So I guess we will have to do PO based invoice verification.
Regards
Nandini

Hi
You can do the Invoicing with reference to PO just like any other Invoicing, the difference in your case is you will get empty line items in MIRO screen since you have not done any Goods receipt. In Import PO scenario we carry out similar payment clearences for all kinds of taxes. So there is nothing psecial yo have to do , only thing you need to take care is that you do not have the Gr-Bsd IV indicator activated.
Regards

Workflow for non PO base invoice (FV60)

Dear All,
I am trying to customizing workflow for non po base invoice. I have done all the nessary customization setting - obwa , obwj , obwb, obwc, obwd.obwe,obwf & using subworkflow WS10000051. Also I have checked that both Released Necessary & Doc. complited marked when document parked. I refered the following thread for the customization setting.
Re: Hi Csaba Soltesz, How can you activate workflow
Now the workflow is not triggering when I a document parked(save as complited). I am checking this via. FB03 ---> workflow --> Workflow overview
Please not that workflow is working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence nessary workflow setting already maintiained in the client.
*Kindly let me know whether I have missed some step?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
spsahu

answered

PO - GR based Invoice Verification/ IR Indicator

Hi,
I am facing a problem with the IR indicator in PO. The scenario is a SC is created, a PO is created automatically out of the SC and then a GR confirmation has to be done against the PO. I am using a service product.
In the vendor master, I have set the "Goods-Receipt-Based Invoice Verification" indicator and "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator.
Now, if I create PO manually then these 2 indicators are defaulted into the PO follow-on documents indicator values. However, when the PO is created automatically from the SC only the IR expected indicator is set so I am not able to create a confirmation against the PO.
The same way, if I set the "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator and "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" indicator in the vendor master then only the "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" is set in the PO (created from SC) and not the IR indicator.
Can someone suggest to me what could the problem be since a manual creation of PO picks up the indicator values from the vendor but it does not when created from a SC?
Many Thanks,
Saravanan.

hi,
See the foll related threads/Links/pointers:
Re: Confirmation for PO without SC
Error Indicator for GR-based invoice verification when order PO
Re: Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt
Re: Indicator u0093GR Conf Expectedu0094 in Business Partner
Invoice Receipt Expected controlled from R/3 Vendor master
Vendor Data Replication Problem
869055 "Follow-on Documents" PO EBP Confirmation Flag 20.05.2006
912428 509(SE) Account assignment for entry sheet missing 19.01.2006
886307 Creating follow-on docs in the Order Collaboration scenario 18.10.2005
518340 EBP: Tolerance checks with goods receipt and invoice 08.06.2005
502981 EBP: Terminatn w/ invoice creatn for back-end purchase order 08.06.2005
450068 EBP: Checks to invoice for BE purchase order incorrect 08.06.2005
834270 IV inbox message BBP_BD 002: "Invoice will be .. 13.05.2005
784775 Goods receipt-based invoice verification indicator part 2
BR,
Disha.

SRM PO failed: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed

Hi Friends,
I have an issue with a specific PO failed to transfer from SRM to ECC. We are in ECS scenario, SRM 5.0 Service level 7.0. We are in process of SP upgrade but this issue occured in Production system which is still in old SP level(SP 7.0).
when I check the App Monitor, I am see the following errors: but the status shows Auto_Completed
1. PO: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
2. PO: Instance XXXXXXXXXX of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
3. PurchOrder XXXXXXXXXX: Purchase order still contains faulty items
4. PO XXXXXXXX: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
I can see the PO copied over to ECC. but status in SRM PO shows 'Error in Process'.
BBP_PD for object PO shows: Created, complete, ordered, In Transfer to Execute, Change was Transmitted as Inactive status. Transfer Failed shows Active, Document completed, created.
I checked BP Maintain for the vendor and PO and its no different than other POs and Vendors except Vendor had 'Goods Receipt based Invoice Verification' indicator checked in SRM.
I tried to simulate the same Material, Vendor with GR-IV indicator both on and off, it works fine. Ofcourse this is in Quality box with SP 15 level.
So, I am not sure if SP level upgrade might help it or not? If there are any other means to test, please advise.
thanks
Rao

I was wondering how I could liquidate the PO by either creating a new PO or ??.
What you could do to revive the PO in question is that after the upgrade, and after a round of background jobs run for CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2, ask the buyer to make a dummy change to the PO (for example, change the description of the PO) and order again. This would trigger the transfer to the backend again. And hopefully this time, no error would occur.

PO & non-PO based invoices

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for