PO or MIGO Error - Posting to GL marked Automatic Posting

Hi Users
I have a GL account which is a P&L account and not a Reconciliation account. The same has been configured in OBYC under GBB-VBR. The account has been marked as automatic posting.
Now, Iam trying to create a Purchase Order for a material with Account Assignment category 'Q', with Account Assignment to a WBS Element and the GL account will get determined automatically (as mentioned above through OBYC). It is at this time that Iam getting this error message.
Further, for Purchase orders already created before (when the account was not marked as automatic posting), the error gets populated at the time of MIGO. In order for me to post to this account, I have to remove the automatic posting tick.
So the query is that, though the account determination is happening automatically through OBYC, still the system is throwing the message that GL account cannot be posted because it is automatic posting.
Let me know in case you require any further details.
Regards
Abhishek Kumar

Hi Kishore
We have created certain service materials which material type SERV and hence we are creating purchase order (actually work orders in business terms) using ME21N. The Account assignment category is 'Q'. I need to post the services directly to a P&L account called 'civil works account'. This posting needs to be assigned to the WBS element and hence the AA category 'Q'. The account I have maintained in OBYC under GBB-VBR for valuation class 3200 (which is assigned to the service material).
I need to maintain this account as automatic posting due to business requirement as no user should be able to post to it directly.
Hope you understood my query now. Kindly assist in resolving the issue.
Regards
Abhishek Kumar.

Similar Messages

MIGO - Accounting - Condition type for Mark up posting to Inventory account

Hi All,
We have a requirement for posting intercompany Stock transfer between Company A and B, and the transfer price will be Moving Average Price (say $ 100) + Mark up (say 25% i.e., 25) of supplying plant.
Created a new PO pricing procedure, and created a new Accrual condition type ZMRK for markup and made it statistical posting. Also in the pricing procedure the Condition type we assigned an Account key ZM1 and Accrual Key ZMA. we tried posting the Goods receipts in the receiving Company B, and it is posting the following entry :
Invetory A/C                 DR         125               (note: Account key ZM1 was not considered for debit account for markup)
GR/IR     A/C                          CR      100
Markup Accrual   A/C             CR        25
REQUIREMENT: Our requirement is that the Mark-UP condition should not hit Inventory Account and should be debited to I/C Mark Up account (assigned to Account key ZM1) and entry should be as below:
Inventory A/C           DR         100
Markup A/C            DR           25
GR/IR     A/C                  CR            125 (accrual is not required, if we can include the markup into GR/IR account)
OR
Inventory A/C        DR       100
Markup      A/C        DR         25
GR/IR         A/C               CR       100
Markup Accrual A/C       CR         25
NOTE: The Material is maintained as Moving Average Price and we dont want to add the Mark Up cost into the MAP of the receiving plant.
Please check and let me know if there is a way to do a condition type in PO pricing procedure to solve the issue of not hitting the inventory posting for condition record or any other way to handle this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Surya

If you dont want the mark up to come in invoice separately, why do you want it to hit a GR / IR account? ( in short why use del cost condition )
If hitting gr / ir is not a requirement and you just need to acrue it, try the following
PB00 to take 100
create 2 conditions one positve and one negative ( accrual, without condition category ) to take the value 10
the + and - will cancel in the inventory account; you can accrue to different accrual accounts

Video error - seeing white question mark when post to my webpage.

Hey everyone, I was wondering if you can help me out.
I recently updated my software and now I'm using iWeb 2.0.4. I created a video using Final Cut Pro and rendered out a .m4v version which I've done several times in the past without a problem. The video of course plays fine in iWeb, I click Publish To Folder (since its not going to a .mac account), then upload the site via FTP. Once on the site, I get a white question mark.
So what I'm wondering is this...could it be the update thats causing the problem OR could it possibly be the server I'm using? This server I've never used before so I don't know how it handles video. Maybe it can't play QT or something...I don't know? I've done this exact same thing several times before and don't know why I'm having problems now. Its only a 3 min. video. I posted ones a lot bigger without a problem but those we put on another server.
If someone could offer me a suggestion I would appreciate it. Thanks!

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Have you tried using the Publish All to MobileMe menu option? Also you can publish to a folder on the desktop and check to see if the movie file is getting included with the other files.
When you're viewing your site with Safari use the Window->Activity menu option. There you can view all the files that are loaded when your page loads and see the size and if it's there at all.
OT

Error when trying to mark a post as helpful

Error
An error in the system has occurred. Please contact the system administrator if the problem persists.
This was in My Questions, in an unanswered questions area.

It is a test. You passed.
Maybe after Leopard comes out, this facility will be restored.

Migo for subcontracting po- Excise invoice is posted later to material docu

Dear all,
While we are doing migo for sub-contracting PO we are getting an error like this Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
process
1. Create subcontracting PO.
2. Issue material 541 MVT.
3. Create sub-contracting challan- dated 8-8-2010.
4. Migo date 8-8-2010.
while entering subcontracting challan no & year, error messege is coming as Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
Pls give solution.
Thnaks & regards
madhu

Hi,
You will have to post the MIGO at least one day after the creation of Excise Challan.
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

MIGO error

Hi All,
This regarding Txn MIGO.
In this txn the screen changes with the business transaction we enter e.g. if we choose Good Reciept the Screen fields and heading changes to Good Reciepts, and if we choose Transfer Posting The screen changes accordingly...
In actual this should happen....
But in our case this is not happening ...i.e. by default it is Good Recipts Screen but as we choose Transfer Posting ,it is not changing, because of that we are getting movement type error.
We know that somewhere we have missed some config..
Please suggest..
Thanks
R

Thanks for reply Vipin,
Let me tell you what exactly is happening...
We have done a BDC for MIGO for automatically Posting for txn type Transfer Posting ...
In BDC we are using A08 for selecting Transfer Posting....
Accordingly the screen has to change for Transfer Posting with corresponding Movement types....
But in actual whn we execute the BDC, The txn Type changes to A08 Tranfer Posting with Others but the screen still shows the Good recipt Others....
dont know where is the problem...
It is working fine in Dev server but in Prod it is giving this problem and due to this it is giving us the error 'Movement type 301 is not planned for this operation"....
In production the txn type name is also changed from Transfer Posting to A08 Transfer Posting....thats why i asked earlier that does it affect the config...
so please suggest the solution....
Thx R

Error while using bapi BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE to post MIRO

Hi Friends,
         Im using bapi BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE to post MIRO.
         im passing data to table GLACCOUNTDATA.
         Below are the table fields im paasing
     INVOICE_DOC_ITEM " '000001' deafault always
     GL_ACCOUNT "Which is constant for all in my case
     ITEM_AMOUNT      " Total PO net amt + Frieght charges header level
     DB_CR_IND      " 'S' always default
     COMP_CODE      " 'RPPL' always default
     TAX_CODE      " 'V0'     deafault always
     PROFIT_CTR       " for ex 1100180. based on plant
          While posting this bapi is trhrowing error as below
     'profit centre RPPL/1100180 does not exist for 01.12.2008'
     where 01.12.2008 is the MIRO posting date which im passing in header.
        We checked dates for profit centres they are correct.
        Awaiting the reply ASAP.
Regards,
Venky

Hi,
It would be better if you do a recheck on data input for BAPI. If you sure the data are ok but the BAPI still gives error message, then I suggest to post to OSS.
Regards,
Teddy Kurniawan

Error in automatic posting

Dear All,
I am getting an error while creating billing doc, system not doing automatic posting because of error in account determination for tax code. I maintained condition record, and also assign the tax code to GL account (GL also not blocked). also checked all setting related to tax procedure and pricing procedure. I couldnt find the problem. Can u please share some ideas.
Thanks.

Hi
Take the help of FI consultant for maintaining the G/L accounts for tax codes and check the account determination in VKOA transaction, and in OBYC check the G/L account assignments.
Regards
srini

Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery

Hi Experts,
I am getting the following error when i try to create Outbound delivery aginst PO.
"L9 612 Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery"
Diagnosis
    The indicator AUFER from the delivery type contradicts the
    storage location constellation that was determined by the
    WM system.
    TVLK-AUFER = '<VAR2>'
    WM = '<VAR1>'
1.Purchase order is Stock transport order ME21N ( UB)
2.Try to create Outbound using VL10B and i am getting the above error,
Thanks in advance.
Cheers...Gopi

Hi Gopi,
Looking at problem you discribed, I am assuming you are using the delivery type other than "NL".
The reason for this error is the indicator "order required" in delivery type defination set to 'X : sales order required' and you have assigned this delivery type to the purshasing document UB in STO customising. So the requirement of delivery defination of having prior document as sales order is conflicting.. so the error is there.
Resolution:
Please change the assigned delivery type to NL to purchasing document type UB in SPRO> MM> Purchase order>set up for STO>assign delivery type and checking rule.
If you have custome delivery type the go to spro> LE> shipping>deliveries>define delivery type
change the order required from X to "B".
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Sudhir

Urgent: Error in idoc(Application document not posted)

Hi experts,
i am getting the error in R/3 side when i am extracting data from it.
i checked with WE07 it's shows the error as follows
"Application document not posted".
it's been urgent how to resolve this issue. please through a light on it.
Regards
Harikrishna N

Hi Hari,
You start error processing by executing the corresponding work items in your Business Workplace. If a file read error could be corrected, for example, the IDocs which have not yet been read can be read and stored in the database manually, by starting report program RSEINB00.
This could be the reason for ur error..
IDoc could not be generated under MC
EDIN: Evaluates the partner data from the MC record
TS70008037
No process code in the additional partner profile MC parameters; Error when writing the application data in the IDoc.
this link givs u the req info
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/dc/6b7f1543d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm]
Hope it helps U
Regards,
NR

MIGO not displaying GOITEM-SGTXT for new posting

Hi All,
MIGO not displaying GOITEM-SGTXT for new posting
last year postings SGTXT is visible,
while checking in customer exits there is no no code.
I want to make it visible GOITEM-SGTXT.
Plz help.
Thanks
Saket

Hi guru's,
I have similar issue with MIGO Material Doc display,
The screen field GOITEM-SGTXT on the 'Where' tab is not displaying for current year ,
Previous years the Text field is displaying with the data.
GOITEM-SGTXT is getting the data from ML18N , ESSR-TXZ01 as the text is not entering through MIGO.
I checked the customer exit and the BADI's for the MIGO , but not activated for manipulating the
GOITEM-SGTXT.
Please give me an idea what makes this issue.
System Details:
ECC 5.0
SAP_APPL - 5.0 Logistics.
SAP_ABA - 6.40 Cross-Application Component
Thank you

Depreciation error :There are no areas to post to in company code SN00

Hi,
When I am running depreciation (AFAB) for a main asset for a particular period, I am getting an error as "There are no areas to post to in company code SN00".
On further checking, the solution seems given is as follows" Using the Customizing functions, check whether the areas to be posted have been given a posting cycle in the company code specified."
Could not understand what does that mean.
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Dusmanta

Hi,
You have to define how depreciation area post to general ledger.
For this in SPRO, in Asset Accounting go to 'Integration with the General Ledger' and in to
'How Depreciation Area post to General Ledger'.
For your dereciation area, check whether 'Area Posts in Realtime' is selected.
regards,
Priya Rajesh.

Add a link, called (Mark all Posts in Category as Read) in DROID area.

In other areas, there is a way to Mark all Posts in Category as Read, please add a link to do it in the DROID area.
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/DROID/ct-p/DROID
Thanks.

KaLin wrote:
We have submitted it as an issue and have gotten word back that it will take a core change in the software. They are now working on this, but it will probably take a software upgrade to fix it.
Looks like the change went through. No more confirm pages.
Thanks for all the hard work taking care of us forum users!
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.
"All knowledge is worth having."

Error : No Cenvat amount to be posted ... urgent

Dear Experts,
I have captured the excise invoice during GR and part 1 entries have been updated.
However, while posting excise invoice when I simulate cenvat in j1iex for import purchase orders I get an error 'No cenvat amount to be posted and no cenvat amount to be reversed'
This is bit urgent....
Cheers!
Sachin Narvekar

Hi,
I also got the same problem. we maintained subtransaction type as IP Import purchase in SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - maintain subtransaction type.
then we maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify excise accounts per transaction. In this maintain maintain values for IP for main transaction of EWPO, GRPO, CAPE.
Then maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify G/L account per excise transaction. Take help of FICO person in this.
By this way I solve the problem.
Regards
Sai Krishna
09810497206

Reward Points - Poster failed to mark answer correct

Is there a process to get an answer marked as correct if the poster fails to do this? I have correctly answered a question but the poster failed to mark it as correct, even though he acknowledged it was correct and thanked me for the answer. The email that I sent him asking him to mark the answer as correct was ignored.

Billy,
I'm not "demanding" anything, I just think users should be polite and follow etiquette.
Whilst I know there are some threads that are incorrectly flagged as Correct, for the most part these flags help others zero in on solutions that may help them. Of course, they need to understand the particular circumstances of that thread, so just copying the solution does not necessarily help. That is why I go to great lengths to explain my solution.
The first thing potential posters should do is perform a search across the relevant forum and read the threads returned. My experience is that many people just do not do that even after it has been suggested to them. Too many times I've seen several posts being created on the same day for pretty much the same question. In a lot of cases, posters just want an answer to their question that is enough for them to resolve their issue and allow them to move on. Of course, it helps them if they spend time to analyse various solutions and follow the advice that best suits their own situation - I always try to find at least three different solutions and check them all before proceeding. However, if the user does do a search and finds several solutions that are the same and are all flagged as correct, they can be pretty certain that they have the solution they need.
I would also say that flagging solutions as Correct in response to people that are new to answering threads encourages them to continue to take an interest in participating in the forums. Human nature being what it is, if you never receive even a thank you, you will give up.
Andy

PO or MIGO Error - Posting to GL marked Automatic Posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for