PO Processing State

Dear All,
Can u tell me all the States of PO Processing as
Purchasing document processing state    03
here what it Mean by 03.
Please help me
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Dear,
The system always creates a new version when the purchasing document has reached a final state.
This means one of the following processing states:
●     Active
If you do not use the document release functionality
●     Release completed
If you use the document release functionality
For a new version of a purchasing document to be created, all messages must have also been transmitted.
No new versions are generated for purchase orders that are on hold.
Not every change to an external purchasing document results in a new version. The following changes lead to a new version:
●     All print-relevant changes
You define which changes are print-relevant in Customizing for Purchasing under Messages ® Fields Relevant to Printouts of Changes.
●     Changes in document assignment
●     Changes in address
Address changes result in a new version only if the field ADRC-NAME1 has been defined as a field that is relevant to printouts of changes.
●     Changes to master conditions
Changes in master conditions result in a new version only if the field EKPO-NETPR has been defined as a field that is relevant to printouts of changes.
Version Data
You will find the version data:
●     In the item details on the Versions tab page in Enjoy purchase requisitions (ME51N, ME52N, ME53N)
●     In the header data on the Versions tab page of Enjoy purchase orders (ME21N, ME22N, ME23N)
●     Under Header ® Versions in RFQs, conventional purchase orders (ME21, ME22, ME23), contracts, and scheduling agreements.
There you can maintain version data (e.g. reason for change) and complete the version. In addition, the Value change field shows you whether and to what extent the value of a requisition or external purchasing document item has changed in comparison with the previous version.
You can display the change documents for one or more versions by selecting the relevant versions and choosing  Display Changes.
Please check accordingly.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Similar Messages

  • BPEL process state "Off"

    Hi,
    I had created one BPEL process which reads from FTP Remote server and writes to local file directory.
    After reading from Remote FTP server I am deleting file from the server. In the remote server I had created on user to interact with FTP server with all permissions. When the BPEL process executed FTP Adapter is deleting the File successfully from remote location but BPEL state is changed to “Off”.
    When I checked the logs, I found there is problem with Delete permission. Actually as mentioned above file is deleted successfully in the remote location.
    OPMN logs:
    <File Adapter::Outbound> Processing file : /click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/\po_28.txt
    <File Adapter::Outbound> Sending message to Adapter Framework for posting to BPEL engine: {
    file=/click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/\po_28.txt
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,677> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment> <CubeProcessHolder::loadAndBind> Check if process FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess, revision 1.0 needs to be reloaded
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,709> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSDLManager::getWSDL> registered wsdl at http://dt1521-localhost.com:80/orabpel/default/FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess/1.0/_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,709> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSDLManager::getWSDL> got wsdl at: http://dt1521-localhost.com:80/orabpel/default/FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess/1.0/_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,724> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Sucessfully sent message : /click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/\po_28.txt to Adapter Framework.
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,724> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Deleting file : /click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/\po_28.txt after processing.
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,724> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Host name is 'DT1521-localhost.com'.
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,724> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Reading reply from DT1521-localhost.com
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,818> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSInvocationManager::invoke> operation: Write, partnerLink: <partnerLink name="FileWriter" partnerLinkType="{http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/file/Write/}Write_plt">
    <myRole name="null">
    <ServiceName>null</ServiceName>
    <PortType>null</PortType>
    <Address>null</Address>
    </myRole>
    <partnerRole name="Write_role">
    <ServiceName>null</ServiceName>
    <PortType>{http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/file/Write/}Write_ptt</PortType>
    <Address>null</Address>
    </partnerRole>
    <conversationId>bpel://localhost/default/FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess~1.0/10610-BpInv1-BpSeq1.3-3</conversationId>
    <properties>{}</properties>
    </partnerLink>
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSDLManager::getWSDL> registered wsdl at D:\OraHome_1\integration\orabpel\domains\default\tmp\.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar\Write.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSDLManager::getWSDL> got wsdl at: D:\OraHome_1\integration\orabpel\domains\default\tmp\.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar\Write.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSInvocationManager::invoke> def is file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/Write.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSIFInvocationHandler::invoke> opName=Write, parnterLink=<partnerLink name="FileWriter" partnerLinkType="{http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/file/Write/}Write_plt">
    <myRole name="null">
    <ServiceName>null</ServiceName>
    <PortType>null</PortType>
    <Address>null</Address>
    </myRole>
    <partnerRole name="Write_role">
    <ServiceName>{http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/file/Write/}Write</ServiceName>
    <PortType>{http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/file/Write/}Write_ptt</PortType>
    <Address>null</Address>
    </partnerRole>
    <conversationId>bpel://localhost/default/FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess~1.0/10610-BpInv1-BpSeq1.3-3</conversationId>
    <properties>{}</properties>
    </partnerLink>
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <WSIFInvocationHandler::doShortCut> Parner Property optShortCut
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> ResourceAdapterMetaData Connection Created
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <AdapterFramework::Outbound> file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/Write.wsdl [ Write_ptt::Write(opaque) ] - Looking up Resource Adapter JDNI location 'eis/FileAdapter'
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Managed Connection Created
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Creating Connection
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Connection Created
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Creating FileInteraction
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FileInteraction Created
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <AdapterFramework::Outbound> Instantiating outbound JCA interactionSpec oracle.tip.adapter.file.outbound.FileInteractionSpec
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,834> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <AdapterFramework::Outbound> Populating outbound JCA interactionSpec oracle.tip.adapter.file.outbound.FileInteractionSpec with properties: {FileNamingConvention=spob230_%SEQ%.txt, OpaqueSchema=true, ElapsedTime=60, NumberMessages=1, PhysicalDirectory=c:\inbound_dir, FileSize=1024000}
    07/06/11 19:00:42 file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/fileAdapterOutboundHeader.wsdl
    07/06/11 19:00:42 file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/fileAdapterOutboundHeader.wsdl
    07/06/11 19:00:42 file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/Write.wsdl
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <AdapterFramework::Outbound> file:/D:/OraHome_1/integration/orabpel/domains/default/tmp/.bpel_FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess_1.0.jar/Write.wsdl [ Write_ptt::Write(opaque) ] - Invoking JCA outbound Interaction
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> File Adapter received an input Record
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Waiting outside sync object.....
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Batcher created using staging : true with number of messages : 1
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Input Record: javax.xml.transform.dom.DOMSource@e5394c
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Translating....
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,849> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Outbound Translation done.
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Refreshed (staging/num Messages) file count : 1
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Host DT1521-localhost.com FTP command: USER orabpel
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Wrote to Control File
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Batching staging File: staging0
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Batcher sending to sender for output file writing
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Sending File to output Dir
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FileAgent.putFile() puts spob230_17.txt in c:\inbound_dir begins ...
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,865> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Done Writing to output file spob230_17.txt in dir c:\inbound_dir !!
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,881> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> End clearing Control File
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,881> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Deleting staging File: staging0
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,881> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> End clearing Control File
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,881> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Interaction gets a ok response
    <2007-06-11 19:00:42,881> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Done with Input Record
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,256> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTP Command: USER, reply:
    331 Password required for orabpel
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,256> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Host DT1521-localhost.com FTP command: PASS
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,506> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTP Command: PASS, reply:
    230 Login OK
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,506> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Host DT1521-localhost.com FTP command: CWD /click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,615> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTP Command: CWD, reply:
    250 Directory successfully changed
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,615> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Host DT1521-localhost.com FTP command: DELE po_28.txt
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTP Command: DELE, reply:
    200 Deleted file "po_28.txt".
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTPClient.deleteFile(): 200 Deleted file "po_28.txt".
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <ERROR> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> FTPClient.deleteFile(): Unable to delete file po_28.txt', reply code = 200
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Processer thread calling onFatalError with exception Error deleting file from FTP Server.
    Unable to delete file from server.
    Please ensure whether the remote file has delete permission.
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <FATAL> <default.collaxa.cube.activation> <AdapterFramework::Inbound> [Get_ptt::Get(opaque)] - Resource Adapter requested Process shutdown!
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.activation> <AdapterFramework::Inbound> Adapter Framework instance: OraBPEL - performing endpointDeactivation for portType=Get_ptt, operation=Get
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,709> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.ws> <File Adapter::Outbound> Endpoint De-activation called in adapter for endpoint : /click/xelusparts/feeds/jabilparts/outbound/process/
    <2007-06-11 19:00:43,725> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment> <CubeProcessHolder::loadAndBind> Check if process FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess, revision 1.0 needs to be reloaded
    <2007-06-11 19:00:44,037> <INFO> <default.collaxa.cube.activation> <AdapterFramework::Inbound> JCAActivationAgent::onStateChanged State is changed for process 'bpel://localhost/default/FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess~1.0/', state=OFF
    <2007-06-11 19:00:44,037> <DEBUG> <default.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment> <CubeProcessHolder::updateRevision> Updated state for process FTPRetrieveTOFileWriteProcess (revision 1.0) to 1
    Thanks,
    Vidya

    Hi SR,
    You can do this by having a BPEL process with a java embedding containing below code.
    * Input Variables
    String processName   = (String)getVariableData("processName");                                                                                 
    String revision      = (String)getVariableData("revision");             
    * Declare variables.
    IBPELProcessHandle procHandle = null;            
    Locator loc = null;            
    BPELProcessMetaData bpelProcessMetadata = null;             
    try{               
         * get Locator Instance
        loc = getLocator();                            
         * Lookup Process. Revision optional.
        if(revision == null || revision.trim().equals(""))            
          procHandle = loc.lookupProcess( processName );             
        else            
          procHandle = loc.lookupProcess(processName, revision);             
        if(procHandle == null)          
          throw new Exception("Unable to find process: " + processName);          
         * Get Metadata of the process.
        bpelProcessMetadata = procHandle.getMetaData();             
         * Set Lifecycle to Retired.
         * Use setState(IBPELProcessConstants.STATE_OFF) to change process state to off.
        bpelProcessMetadata.setLifecycle(IBPELProcessConstants.LIFECYCLE_RETIRED);    
         * Finally update the process with the modified metadata.
        procHandle.updateMetaData(bpelProcessMetadata);                   
    }catch (Exception e)                            
      addAuditTrailEntry(e);              
    }If you want you can schedule this process.
    Regards
    PavanKumar.M

  • Updates getting stuck in V2 processed state

    Hi,
    In our ERP production system EP0, update entries are getting stuck
    in 'V2 Processed' state.
    Details of the same show that the collective run state is in initial
    state for functional module 'MCEX_UPDATE_03'.
    Please find the attached screenshot of details.
    These updates are gettin stuck for specific transactions like MIGO.
    We have already tried running the report RSM13005 but it has not helped.
    Please look into it urgently as the system is a production system.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Suresh
    Edited by: suresh k on Sep 26, 2008 2:38 PM

    Hi
    As you checked in transaction SM13 they are stucked in Initial state. There was various states associated with the update like INIT and ERR.
    What is INIT status:
    Update records which have not yet been processed have the status INIT or AUTO. INIT refers to a complete update record (header, function module call of update and data elements are present), which has not yet been processed however.
    What to do: SM13 -> Update records -> Update -> All records/Single
    you can set the update administration so that all records with the status 'INIT' or AUTO' (all update records which have not yet been updated) are processed (as far as possible).
    Warnings: please check with the user who posted the updates in the first place - make sure that they have not already reposted the update manually. If you are in doubt, please re-enter the data manually rather than using this update function.
    Hope this helps!!
    Kind Regards
    Esha
    Edited by: Esha Rajpal on Sep 30, 2008 5:06 AM

  • Content in Processing State

    Hi,
    There are some 500 plus content in processing state. I have run the "Automatic Update cycle",still no improvment.
    I have ran the "Collection rebuild cycle" its in process.
    Any idea how make this contents LIVE.

    You don't give much guidance what the problem of the 'processing state'.
    I'd suggest you resubmit one of the content items via Repository Manager (see this manual http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E10316_01/cs/cs_doc_10/documentation/tutorials/tutorials_cserver_10en.pdf chapter 7 - it's a 10g stuff, but still valid), and then check the log, if it gives you a clue.

  • Idoc in processing state in ECC

    Hi All,
    I have JMS to Idoc scenario.
    The data is being successfully posted from PI. I have checked sxi_monitor and RWB both.
    The Idocs reach ECC but are in Processing state. Status 64.
    I checked we20 Partner profile it is set to trigger immediately.
    Please suggest what could be possible error.
    Thanks.

    Hey,
    >Can this be the reason: Username used to create the Partner profile does not have authorizations.
    No,
    Did you checked Queue Processing check Box ?  &  what is the Package  value you mentioned ( Try  with  value - 1 ),
    Cheers
    Agasthuri

  • SQL Azure Data Sync stuck in Processing State since 5 Sep 2014

    Hi,
    I've a sync group stuck in "processing" state since 5 Sep 2014, have tried to restart the client PC, restarted the sync service and also tried to regenerate the sync agent key, but still in vain. Would anyone please help me to figure it out what's
    the problem? As I have many sync groups running without any problem for more than a year and encountered this problem recently (in this 3 months). 
    Here's the sync group details:
    Sync Group Name
        ew_sync_a054
    Status
        Processing
    LAST SYNC
        9/5/2014 5:57:35 PM
    Sync Group ID
        94f34eaa-cf1c-4af0-950e-7aa565ccc781_East Asia
    Location
        East Asia
    Subscription Name
        Solo Customer Batch 2
    Subscription ID
        cda925fa-16c4-44b6-b3dc-8fc0cb82ad07
    Conflict Resolution
        Client Wins
    Thanks for your help.
    Best regards,
    Michael Yung

    Hi Bowen,
    I've checked the local agent has been offline at 2014/09/05 18:00:00 UTC+8, as the shop close every night and they will shut down the computer, but they've turned on the computer in next day morning, and they keep turning that off at night, turn
    back on at next morning.
    I've checked the agent was online during that "stuck" period when the computer was turned on, as I could click the "PING SYNC SERVICE" and it reported it could reach the sync server, and I could also view from the portal that the agent
    was online, just the sync group stuck in the "processing" status.
    Best regards,
    Michael Yung

  • SQL Azure Data Sync stuck in Processing State since 14 Sep 2014

    Hi,
    I've a sync group stuck in "processing" state since 14 Sep 2014, have tried to restart the client PC, restarted the sync service and also tried to regenerate the sync agent key, but still in vain. Would anyone please help me to figure it out what's
    the problem? This problem happened across my sync group very frequent recently (they're located in different physical locations), but still no workaround or the root cause :(
    Here's the sync group details:
    Sync group name:  ew_sync_a069
    Status
    Processing
    LAST SYNC
    9/14/2014 11:11:22 PM
    Sync Group ID
    4a604aad-e318-469d-adde-9ed4e1d52ead_East Asia
    Location
    East Asia
    Subscription Name
    Solo Customer Batch 3
    Subscription ID
    a68811f9-f82a-4e7c-b93c-d1bee226f84b
    Conflict Resolution
    Client Wins
    Thanks
    for your help.
    Best regards,
    Michael Yung

    As the client need the sync to be fixed ASAP, cannot wait for the answer / help, I've removed the sync agent, compare the data (what data need to download from Azure to client, what data need to upload from client to Azure) and recreate back the sync group.
    Hi Micheal,
    Is this the workaround in your scenario? Since the Azure SQL Data Sync failed, the Microsoft support engineer will help to solve the problem from backend based on your subscription ID and Sync Group ID. Sometime delay might be expected. Your patience is
    greatly appreciated. Thank you for your understanding and support.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • SQL Azure Data Sync stuck in Processing State since 16 Aug 2014

    Hi,
    I've a sync group stuck in "processing" state since 16 Aug 2014, have tried to restart the client PC, restarted the sync service and also tried to regenerate the sync agent key, but still in vain. Would anyone please help me to figure it out what's
    the problem? As I have many sync groups running without any problem for more than a year and encountered this problem recently (in this 3 months). 
    Here's the sync group details:
    Sync Group Name
    ew_sync_a037
    LAST SYNC
    8/16/2014 9:17:37 PM
    Sync Group ID
    15a3a3c5-f867-4ba4-b7af-92fb5c8d36a6_East Asia
    Location
    East Asia
    Subscription Name
    Pay-As-You-Go
    Subscription ID
    f979186d-23f7-45e3-8d5e-c14c89c56a7f
    Conflict Resolution
    Client Wins
    Thanks for your help.
    Best regards,
    Michael Yung

    Hi Michael,
    Thanks for you posting the subscription ID and Sync Group ID. The Microsoft support engineer will help to solve the problem from backend. Sometime delay might be expected. Your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your understanding and support.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Callbacks for Process States

    Hi all,
    Are there any callbacks available for Process states(faulted,closed,completed) etc similar to callbacks for human workflow tasks in BPEL 1013? I need to handle the scenarios when a process is faulted or is aborted (from BPELConsole) and propagate this information to my application.
    thanks,
    Ravikiran

    This is normal exception handling. You just use the Fault handling in the SOAP response.
    Create a Fault message in your BPEL process and send this back to the client.

  • Since the NEW version has been installed, I've receive an update notice of a critical update. Each time I select to apply that update the dialog display never apply any update, it looks to be in a processing state but never completes.

    Any Firefox updates are set to automatically update on my computer. I currently have version 4.0.
    Since the NEW version has been installed, I've receive an update notice for a critical update several times. Each time I select to apply that update the dialog display never apply any update, it looks to be in a processing state but never completes. Of late I've had 2 unexpected issues surface. (1) a Flash Player stopped flashing, an "player stopped" message appeared, "send error report" and a reload player message was included. (2) I just received a error message > 400 "Bad Request" when the browser first opened. This has never happened before.
    Michael Armstrong
    mikes16arms

    It is a Remote Desktop Client Update 3.7.1
    Thank you for answering. I apologize it has taken me so long to get back in here.
    I just realized that I wrote that I installed from app store originally, but I must correct that statement. I never paid for the app so it must have come preinstalled on my 2011 iMac. I was confused since the update is through the store so I assumed I downloaded it. Sorry for any miscommunication.
    So to be clear, even though I have never remotely administered / accessed my computer and I no longer have ARD on my computer, it is normal to have the client update appear in my App Store. Is that correct?
    I appreciate your assistance.

  • Po release workflow remains in "In Process" state

    Hi workflow Guru's,
    The release strategy attached with PO requires 2 level of approval.( copied standard WF20000075 .).
    when user creates PO nd saves the PO, workflow initiates to first level PO releasing with assignment of role.
    When approver double clicks  work-item he is taken to PO release screen and he can able to release the PO.
    now as per sequence, work-item should now flow to 2 level approver whereas 
    work-item remains in "in process'
    state in 1 level approvers inbox and workflow also remains in "In Process " state.
    Please help me out sort this issue.
    Regards,
    Mohd.

    Dear Abdul..
    Try these 2 things,
    1. Go to that particular step in workflow where you have done the binding for release code & click check icon to check whether binding for release code is error free... There are chances for your workflow to get activated but the binding in a particular step can contain errors.. So check this first..
    2. You should be passing the release code value from workflow container to task container.. Check whether value is coming correctly in workflow container first.. I believe it will not come as part of standard workflow & you should have written your custom logic to fetch that.. If yes then thoroughly check your custom logic (In case of BOR method then execute that method individually in SWO1 & check whether values are coming correctly).. If the value of release code is coming correctly in workflow container & not in task container (you can check this by going to that particular step in SWI1 & see the container tab) then again go to SWDD & click check icon in binding for that step to see whether its error free..
    I strongly feel that workflow is going into INPROCESS state because of this missing release code value..
    Kindly check & let us know ..
    Regards,
    Bharath

  • Sync Process stuck on the Process State

    This morning i check the Sync status like every morning and find out this issue:
    Sync failed with the exception "Error in RelationalProviderProxy.ExecuteAndRetryServiceOperation, Method: Void <BeginSession>b__0(), CurrentTimeout: 60 Exception
    Details: System.ServiceModel.Security.MessageSecurityExceptionThe security timestamp is invalid because its creation time ('2014-10-27T20:43:13.669Z') is in the future. Current time is '2014-10-27T20:38:13.124Z' and allowed clock skew is '00:05:00'.Server
    stack trace:    at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityTimestamp.ValidateFreshness(TimeSpan timeToLive, TimeSpan allowedClockSkew)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityTimestamp.ValidateRangeAndFreshness(TimeSpan timeToLive, TimeSpan allowedClockSkew)
      at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.ReadTimestamp(XmlDictionaryReader reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.ExecuteFullPass(XmlDictionaryReader reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.StrictModeSecurityHeaderElementInferenceEngine.ExecuteProcessingPasses(ReceiveSecurityHeader
    securityHeader, XmlDictionaryReader reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.Process(TimeSpan timeout, ChannelBinding channelBinding, ExtendedProtectionPolicy extendedProtectionPolicy)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessageCore(Message&
    message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan
    timeout, SecurityProtocolCorrelationState[] correlationStates)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.SecurityChannelFactory`1.SecurityRequestChannel.ProcessReply(Message reply, SecurityProtocolCorrelationState correlationState, TimeSpan timeout)   at
    System.ServiceModel.Channels.SecurityChannelFactory`1.SecurityRequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.RequestChannelBinder.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String
    action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage
    message)Exception rethrown at [0]:    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)  
    at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.ClientServerCommon.ISyncServiceContract.BeginSession(String scopeName, SyncTaskRequestInfo syncInfo, DssConflictResolutionPolicy conflictPolicy, String objectSchema)   at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.AgentHostLib.RelationalProviderProxy.<BeginSession>b__0()
      at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.AgentHostLib.SyncServiceProxy`1.ExecuteAndRetryServiceOperation(Action operation)Inner exception: The security timestamp is invalid because its creation time ('2014-10-27T20:43:13.669Z') is in the future. Current time is
    '2014-10-27T20:38:13.124Z' and allowed clock skew is '00:05:00'."    For more information, provide tracing ID ‘01b12bfd-1467-4fb2-ad8e-551a85fdd1da’ to customer support.
    And after that the Sync got stuck in the processing state, i try to stop it and resend it again but is still trying to stop it. I already fix the time settings in the server and restart the service of sync and nothing. Here are the info related to the Sync
    Group. 
    STATUS
    Processing
    LAST SYNC
    10/27/2014 4:24:00 PM
    SYNC GROUP ID
    045ac6f9-d27a-47ba-8194-7aadf8fc90de_East US
    LOCATION
    East US
    SUBSCRIPTION NAME
    Pay-As-You-Go
    SUBSCRIPTION ID
    399ba2d3-f357-4c7b-a52e-972bcb3cc2d7
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Client Wins

    Hi,
    Thanks for you posting the subscription ID and Sync Group ID. The Microsoft support engineer will help to solve the problem from backend. Sometime delay might be expected. Your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your understanding and support.
    Regards,
    Mekh.

  • Sync stuck on processing state

    On 10/02/2014 20:34 ET there's an error in the sync group (This is production)
    Sync failed with the exception "Error in RelationalProviderProxy.ExecuteAndRetryServiceOperation, Method: Void <BeginSession>b__0(), CurrentTimeout: 60 Exception Details: System.ServiceModel.Security.MessageSecurityExceptionThe security timestamp
    is invalid because its creation time ('2014-10-03T01:04:31.703Z') is in the future. Current time is '2014-10-03T00:59:31.509Z' and allowed clock skew is '00:05:00'.Server stack trace:    at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityTimestamp.ValidateFreshness(TimeSpan
    timeToLive, TimeSpan allowedClockSkew)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityTimestamp.ValidateRangeAndFreshness(TimeSpan timeToLive, TimeSpan allowedClockSkew)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.ReadTimestamp(XmlDictionaryReader
    reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.ExecuteFullPass(XmlDictionaryReader reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.StrictModeSecurityHeaderElementInferenceEngine.ExecuteProcessingPasses(ReceiveSecurityHeader securityHeader,
    XmlDictionaryReader reader)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.ReceiveSecurityHeader.Process(TimeSpan timeout, ChannelBinding channelBinding, ExtendedProtectionPolicy extendedProtectionPolicy)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessageCore(Message&
    message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityProtocol.VerifyIncomingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan
    timeout, SecurityProtocolCorrelationState[] correlationStates)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.SecurityChannelFactory`1.SecurityRequestChannel.ProcessReply(Message reply, SecurityProtocolCorrelationState correlationState, TimeSpan timeout)   at
    System.ServiceModel.Channels.SecurityChannelFactory`1.SecurityRequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.RequestChannelBinder.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String
    action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation)   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage
    message)Exception rethrown at [0]:    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)  
    at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.ClientServerCommon.ISyncServiceContract.BeginSession(String scopeName, SyncTaskRequestInfo syncInfo, DssConflictResolutionPolicy conflictPolicy, String objectSchema)   at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.AgentHostLib.RelationalProviderProxy.<BeginSession>b__0()
      at Microsoft.SqlAzureDataSync.AgentHostLib.SyncServiceProxy`1.ExecuteAndRetryServiceOperation(Action operation)Inner exception: The security timestamp is invalid because its creation time ('2014-10-03T01:04:31.703Z') is in the future. Current time is
    '2014-10-03T00:59:31.509Z' and allowed clock skew is '00:05:00'."    For more information, provide tracing ID ‘a4808300-c03c-4d5d-a658-0b220bab58c6’ to customer support.
    And after that the Sync got stuck in the processing state, i try to stop it and resend it again but is still trying to stop it. I already fix the time settings in the server and restart the service of sync and nothing. Here are the info related to the Sync
    Group. 
    SYNC GROUP ID
    045ac6f9-d27a-47ba-8194-7aadf8fc90de_East US
    LOCATION
    East US
    SUBSCRIPTION NAME
    Pay-As-You-Go
    SUBSCRIPTION ID
    399ba2d3-f357-4c7b-a52e-972bcb3cc2d7
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Client Wins

    Hi,
    We've just reset the sync group status at our service backend. Could you please check whether your sync back to work now? Let us know if any more question.
    Regards,
    Bowen

  • My sync group is stuck in the processing state

    The database sync that we have configured has been working for months and suddenly stopped successfully running 1/19/2015 2:19 PM Pacific Time. We have the sync configured to automatically execute every 5 mins and I even tried to run it manually. The job
    stays perpetually in a "Processing" state with no additional info (e.g. error, warning, etc).
    Can anyone provide assistance? (e.g. reset the sync status, provide detailed logging as to the cause of the issues) What is the proper course of action? (e.g. reconfigure the sync service, etc) Please advise.
    Here are the technical details of the instance:
    STATUS
    Processing
    LAST SYNC
    1/19/2015 2:19:25 PM
    SYNC GROUP ID
    e5c228ff-a8e8-4b99-85f8-504709e22908_West US
    SUBSCRIPTION ID
    4caa7e07-76e5-424d-8b4b-6f26cce36026
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Hub Wins

    Hi,
    Thanks for posting here.
    Any of the following can result in a sync group being stuck in the processing state.
    a)The client agent is offline.
    Be sure that the client agent is online then try again.
    b)The client agent is uninstalled or missing. 
    Please check the above and try to sync again.
    In the mean time we would check from our back-end. It may take more time than expected. 
    Girish Prajwal

  • ABAP list processing statements in ABAP Objects

    Hi,
    Based on the Online help "The ABAP statements used for list processing are not yet fully available in ABAP Objects".
    Is there any chnage planned about this for the next WAS release?
    Thanks,
    Peter

    Hi Peter
    I believe, most of the measures taken are for some compatibility and performance issues. So, there is no need to expect great changes about this.
    *--Serdar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Vendor return via delvery

    Hi all I have activated vendor return via delivery: MIGO referred to the original good receipt, movemement 122 and delivery type RLL. After that I need to create CREDIT MEMO. When I go in MIRO and select credit memo referred to the purchase order, I

  • HT1338 Desktop Looks Miniature! Help!!

    I just installed software updates yesterday. Today when I turned on my mac, the desktop was only a portion of the entire screen and blue on the outside. I see the entire desktop - it's just miniature. Can this be fixed to look normal again?

  • 1099 sent to 2 different names and addresses.

    Hi all, Could some one please answer to this question. Is it possible in ECC6.0 to  send 1099 to one name and  payment to another name ?

  • Webutil demo wu_test

    ias904 - winclient - unix servert (AS/DB) Trying built-in - read image file I'm getting a 0 byte file created on the server. Is the built-in write_image_file windows only or is there something else missing ? Thanks for any hints Pete 2004-Jun-25 12:5

  • All I get is a pic of usb to itunes

    Ios 6 did not want to install, tried one more time and now all I get is a pic of a usb cable pointing to itunes, I tried a hard reboot, did not work, not recognized by computer