PO release authorization change

Hi,
We have release procedure defined for purchase order's and the authorized person will receive the notification email to his inbox and to SAP business workplace when a PO is created. The requirement is we need to change the authorized person, please let me know how can we do it.
Thanks.

Check the customer exit M06E0005 and table mentioned within.
You need to change the User ID against the release code in the subjected table mentioned in above customer exit.
- Sunil K
Edited by: SUNIL KOLAMBKAR on Apr 8, 2011 6:56 AM

Similar Messages

Unable to release the change request from se01

HI All,
Recently i had applied Rsecnotes as per sap recommendation in EWA Report and I implemented successfully in DEV System. But, When i try to release the change requests from SE01 in (DEV System)
it is giving the error message "Object Func<objectname> is inactive". I have unlocked all the request and checked but still problem exsist.
Please help me to release the request and implement in the landscape.
Thanks,
Rajesh N

Hi,
Activate the object using se03 and then relaese the request
thanks

Release dates changed?

For reasons I don't understand, all the Release Dates for all our tracks on our iTunes U site recently changed to 5/29/07.
We've been uploading tracks at various dates since October 2006, so this is not at all what we want for many reasons -- not least of which is that folks who've subscribed to our various channels are finding tracks being re-downloaded to their computers since it appears that they're 'new'.
Any idea what went wrong? Any way to restore the actual release dates to what they were in early May?
Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Hi Duncan. Glad to hear folks are trying to resolve this problem.
Just to clarify -- the problem is still happening, i.e., the release dates are still changing.
Is any other iTunes U site seeing this problem, or is it only Wellesley?
I'm hopeful that there's a way to both restore the original release dates as well as prevent the release dates changing in the future.
Thanks so much....k

Release authorization for Posting FI document nor Parked document

hii guru
I am facing a problem as below. i have created a release authorization for parking document using workflow variant, created event - Created, object type - FIPP, receiver type - WS10000051, and when i am parking the document its working fine, wants release authorization to post parked document. but my client requirement is to set release authorization for posting FI document in fb50. not parked document.
please give me a solution how do i cofigure the release authorization to post directly FI Document in fb50.
thanks & regards
Rajesh

i have solved by myself

Releasing authorization for maintenance order and permit.

Hi,experts,
We have two different user id say "X" and Y.We want to block releasing authorization of maintenance order and permit for user id "X" and give the same to user id "Y",How we can do it in SAP?Please,give some suggestions on this.Thanks in advance.
rgds
rajib

Hiii
You can create two seperate Authorization role using PFCG transaction code. Assign it to particular users & control the authorization. Use Following procedure.
1. Transaction code PFCG will take you on screen role creation screen.
2. Give authorization for IW32 transaction code in that block authorization according to business transaction for BFRE. This business operation is made for order release.
For permit there is seperate option is available for permits also.
If you have any issue, pl. be free to ask question.
Regards

Doubt in PR, PO release authorizations and in workflow

hi all,
I have a doubt in release authorizations in PR, PO. I have designed the workflow and it is working fine for PR, PO release. The corresponding persons getting work item in their inbox.
But in the standard transaction code ME29n, the other users also getting the PR for release and it is getting released. How to avoid that?.
I have a scenario such that the corresponding persons in a particular department, only have to release their PR and POs, not the others.
Thanks in advance!!!

Hi- This can be solved by giving authorisations to the correponding approvers. SAP delivered standard authorisation objects for this purpose ( i dont have system now to give details). You need to talk to basis and they will solve this
Vinoth

Log of authorization changes?

Hi there,
We gave access in a development box of SAP_ALL to a few users.
Does anyone know a report or table that I can use to determine the DATE and TIME that these users were given this SAP_ALL authorization?
thank you.

As you have only mentioned profile "SAP_ALL" and not other authorizations of the same ilk, nor mentioned which release you are on... so it is a very "vanilla" question, and nothing in "particular" (or state your question more precisely).
For example, try this:
Run report RSUSR100 (or via transaction SUIM you can find the same) to see whether it works.
Then search the forum here for the term "RSUSR100" to verify that no terms such as "Change AND Document" or "History AND Profiles" or "Users AND Audit" was used related to this.
Then maybe I will believe you...
Cheers,
Julius

Best practices to reduce downtime for Database releases(rolling changes)

Hi,
What are best practices to reduce downtime for database releases on 10.2.0.3? What DB changes can be rolling and what can't?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
RJiv.

I would be very dubious about any sort of universal "best practices" here. Realistically, your practices need to be tailored to the application and the environment.
You can invest a lot of time, energy, and resources into minimizing downtime if that is the only goal. But you'll generally pay for that goal in terms of developer and admin time and effort, environmental complexity, etc. And you generally need to architect your application with rolling upgrades in mind, which necessitates potentially large amounts of redesign to existing applications. It may be perfectly acceptable to go full-bore into minimizing downtime if you are running Amazon.com and any downtime is unacceptable. Most organizations, however, need to balance downtime against other needs.
For example, you could radically minimize downtime by having a second active database, configuring Streams to replicate changes between the two master databases, and configure the middle tier environment so that you can point different middle tier servers against one or the other database. When you want to upgrade, you point all the middle tier servers against database A other than 1 that lives on a special URL. You upgrade database B (making sure to deal with the Streams replication environment properly depending on requirements) and do the smoke test against the special URL. When you determine that everything works, you configure all the app servers to point at B and have Streams replication process configured to replicate changes from the old data model to the new data model), upgrade B, repeat the smoke test, and then return the middle tier environment to the normal state of balancing between databases.
This lets you upgrade with 0 downtime. But you've got to license another primary database. And configure Streams. And write the replication code to propagate the changes on B during the time you're smoke testing A. And you need the middle tier infrastructure in place. And you're obviously going to be involving more admins than you would for a simpler deploy where you take things down, reboot, and bring things up. The test plan becomes more complicated as well since you need to practice this sort of thing in lower environments.
Justin

PR Item Level Release WF not working after Release Strategy change

Hi Experts,
           I did PR item Level Release Standard Work flow and it was working fine now due to client requirement we changed the release strategy and now when the PR workflow triggers it gives the Below mentioned error.
I really don't understand y after changing the release strategy workflow is not working and giving the following error.
Even if i restart the workflow in SWPR the same error is occuring.
Exception occurred    - Error when starting work item 000000390118
PROCESS_NODE     - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
CREATE                   - Error when creating a component of type 'Step'
CREATE_VIA_WFM - Agent determination for step '0000000003' failed
EVALUATE_AGENT_VIA_RULE - Error in resolution of rule 'AC00000148' for step '0000000003'
AC00000148             - Object type 'TS' not valid
Executing flow work item   - Work item 000000390118: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot        be executed
Executing flow work item   - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
Regards,
Hari

Hello Hari,
please set a breakpoint at function module
ME_REL_GET_RESPONSIBLE
and see what happends in section
    CASE t16fc-frgwf.
* keine Ermittlung
      WHEN space.
        RAISE nobody_found.
* Ermittlung über T16fW
      WHEN '1'.
If using the T16FW-table, it should go to '1', otherwise it may that a user exit under '9' is used. So please check this.
Best wishes,
Florin

Not able to release normal change document for development

Hello All
We have Implemented ChaRM in SolMan 7.1 SP10
Have created the Project and activated Charm with required DEV/QA/PRD logical component and before creating the Maintenance cycle, we did a check in the project which showed all green..
We are able to create a request for Change and go till the approval, when we try to change the status to release for development, it is throwing the below error and not letting us go further.
We have checked the MC phase, and it is in phase Dev with release.
Project is in IN PROCESS state.
IBASE and Component details are correct.
Tried to put back to Validation and re tried for Development and this did not work.
Until unless change document created successfully, we cannot go ahead even though MC phase is in DEV with release.
I have seen few blogs and I have checked below steps
system roles in SMSY
Landscape system info
Changed MC phase to DEV with release
Strange why it is not allowing to create change document ???
Please assist
Thanks
Sateesh.

Hello,
Three consistency checks are performed when you choose action "release for development" (resulting in the SMCR's status "being implemented"):
PROJECT_ASSIGNED: Project is Assigned
SYSTEM_EXIST: System assigned to collective change request
FOLLOW_ON_GEN_OK: Change Documents Can be Created
In case any of these checks fails, the SMCR's status returns to "approved".
These same consistency check are also checked when the SMCR status is set to "approved". The behavior for a failed check, however, is different in this case. Just a warning message is shown on the top of the screen and the "approved" status can be set.
Question 1: When you set the SMCR to "approved", those warnings are shown too?
Perhaps there is something wrong with the assigned project.
Check if the assigned logical component has the correct systems/clients.
Check if the transport tracks between the systems listed in the logical component are working.
Question 2: When you assign the scope (change type, in your case, Normal Change), some system data from the production system defined in the logical component are automatically filled (System, Client, Configuration Item, etc). Is this happening?
Regards,
Daniel

How to release the Change request (Task in Repair Mode)

Hello everybody,
I have change request in that one Task in Repair mode.
when i trying to release, it give the error message like
Repair HRDK900911 may only contain repaired objects
Diagnosis
In repairs, you can only lock and edit those objects whose original exists in another SAP System.
The object R3TR PROG /VWK/GPS_VCD_R was found in the object list of your repair HRDK900911. This object is not a copy but the original.
So please suggest me
How to release the Task (Repair) so I can release the request.
Thanks

Yes you wont be able to release the request till you remove the flag from SE03.
Goto SE03 > Display Repaired Objects
Select Your object and remove the repair flag from top <Repair Flag>
R3TR PROG <Your Object>
Also as you are getting an error
No valid change license available for namespace
In SE03-->Display/change Namespace
when I check the specified Namespace then their is no Repair License.
So please suggest me Repair License is required?
check what namespace it is refrerring to ... A namespace name should be there....
1. Go to SE06 and click on the System Change Option.
2. Verify that Namespace Systems Development /Namespace/ is "Modifiable".
or
1. Run transaction SM30
2. Enter V_TRNSPACE
2. Click Maintain
3. Double Click on Namespace /NAMESPACE/
4. Change Namespace role from P to C, then hit Save
All the best !
Edited by: prateek_y on Aug 30, 2010 3:21 PM

PO with release stratergy - change the print parameter setting

Hi all,
In case of PO with release startetgy, when the PO is released by the last approver and after saving, the print should automatically come in the place of the creator.
for ex: PO creator is A. His default printer is A1
PO approver B. His default printer is B1.
once B approves the PO, the print should come in A1.
Kindly help me in fixing the issue.

Hi,
Thanks for your input. A little change in the logic.
Our PO will have two output type.
A - PO creator - print parameter p1
B - PO approver - print parameter p2
CASE 1:
if output type1 is choosed, when B approves printout should come from p2.
Case 2:
if output type 2 is choosed, when B approves printout should come from p1.
Note: No work flow is involved and print program cannot be changed. Can use user exit.

Po Release Strategy Change

Hi Gurus
I am changing the release strategy for po.
Same characterstics and value also same.
only change is release codes. so that, what i can do. if i add new release codes in same old strategies ?
Otherwise i can create new release strategies ?
if i create new what i have to take steps ?
if i use same old release strategy and in that i can chage release codes what about previous documents ?
client side cl24n here we can block old stratiges what about the documents created on old ?
If any body answer right rewarded full.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Laxman

Hi
we have also did some changes to relase codes after once in use & we had encountered some problems in the PO.
For E.g. If you have the previous repease codes as L1 & L2 , & if you are removeing the L2 form the release codes then All the PO's whcih are approved by L1 & awaiting tobe approed by L2 will be in hanging status. You need to go into each PO 7 click on revoke acceptance & Click on check then The new relase codes will appear.
If you can clearly explain what you are planning to do on the relase codes , then we can advise you in the right manner.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

PO Release for - change in item (material) price

Dear Sir,
Can you guide me in following Purchase Order release scenario :
1) While making Purchase Order if there is change in item(material) Price (only increase only) then wants approval.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Hi ,
No , If earlier i purchased material A @ 500 now second time i am purchasing same material A@600 means price change is there ,then i required release (approval).
If it was same like earlier A@500 then not required release (approval)
Regards,
MAhesh.

Mrbr automatice release authorization issue

In our problem it is required to address issues encountered while executing the MRBR transaction in batch mode. During dialog processing (manual mode) all selected invoice document with all invoice blocks are clearing without issue. When executing in background / batch mode it is failing to clear some of the same invoice with same document type and invoice blocks as in dialog mode with same defined variants.
   To clear all Invoice blocks in background/batch mode

Hi,
Pls. check in transaction SU24 the Settings for object M_MSEG_WWE -> if you set it for
the TRANSACTION ML81N only, this setting will be not relevant for others transactions.
In SU24 the setting for the authorization M_MSEG_BWE should be changed to "not check"!
Regards,
Edit

PO release authorization change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for