PO should not go for approval if it is from a contract

Dear Gurus,
This company wants to approve the contract but the POs created from that contract should not go for approval again. Please give an idea to achieve this requirement?
Thanks,
Chameendri

Hi,
We need to define Contract under characteristics of PO approval process goto SPRO > Materials Management > Purchase Order > Release Procedure fro Purchase Orders > Edit Class
Enter Class : for example POREL , class type 032 > Char tab
Enter POCONTRACT under characteristics
Enter Contract Number  under description
Enter CHAR under Data Type
Enter 10 under No.of characters and 0 under decimal places
Then go to PO release strategy > Classification
Enter Contract Number under characteristic Description and Value leave it blank
this is what we did in our company and it is working fine.
POs created with referece to approved contract is not triggering to approval process again.
I dont know whether you are still waiting for the answer.
Please try and let us know the results, if it works.
Thanks.
Udaya

Similar Messages

  • Net price field should not be edited in PO, when created reff. to contract

    Dear friends,
    I have a requirement like this.....
    User referring the contract in creating the purchase order, details of the contracts are copied in to the purchase order. the price field is in edit mode....
    requirement is that user should not edit this field, the price carried from the contract should be not edit mode. this is to be hapen only when purchase order is created referrence of contract.
    here we are using only the standard document type is used for creating Purchase orders with and without the referrence of contract.   
    Thanks in advance...
    Shashidhar

    What I did for a client was implementing enhancement (user exit) MM06E005 to perform checking during PO creation.
    OSS note 310154 explains how to issue error messages from ME21N from the user exit.

  • PIR should not consume for the SubReq

    Hi Guru's,
    Please help me how to configure the planning strategy for my below requirement.
    Currently i am procuring a HALB material thru subcontracting. This HALB is having BOM components. I need to send the BOM components to the vendor for assembly.
    The BOM components will be used in some other HALB also. My requirement is, the BOM components should not consume for the subcontracting requirements, it needs to consume for in house production only.
    The subcon requirement needs to generate the dependent requirements only, it should consume the PIR.
    Currently i am using the planning strategy 70, requirement type VSFB. In this, PIR is consuming for the SubReq.
    Please suggest me the suitable planning strategy for this scenario.
    Thanks & Regards,
    V. Suresh

    Suresh,
    I am curious why you would not want SubReq. It is also a different kind of dependent requirement. Also it seems yo are supplying the components to your vendor. So it makes sense that your forecast is consumed by dependent requirements so that planning is effective.
    If for any reason you do not want to supply components to vendor then it would be best to mark such components as vendor provided. In such cases it would not consume your forecast (PIR). Hope this gives some new perspective.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

    Dear all
    with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
    how it is possible.
    Regrads
    Srinivas

    Dear ,
    In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
    We can change it as per req using user exit
    Regards,
    Ishwar

  • How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi

    I have a subvi which takes the parameters like port name, transmit rate, message to transmit over serial port and Start/stop flag. This subvi calls VISA write vi in a loop continuously, till the Start/Stop flag is false, to write a message to serial port at a mentioned transmit rate. This subvi will be called from another VI. Actual intension is to transmit different messages to different ports continuously and stop them when required. In this senario, please provide solution for below points:
    1. How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi.
    2. How does main vi can control already running subvi in parallel to it. In the above example I would like to start the subvi from main vi when start\stop flag is true and would like to stop it when the flag is false.
    3. How do I call the subVI with one set of parameters from main vi, when same subVI is running with other set of parameters already from main vi(subvi being called in a case with different set of parameters each time when the case is called). Means, how do I keep track of reentrant subvi (different calls to same vi)from the same main vi.

    Hi Dharani24,
    Try if these are helpful,
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/DB92C44E7D4D8A1B862577CB007D9C45
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/asynchronous_vi_calls/
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/reentrancy/
    Thanks
    uday,
    Please Mark the solution as accepted if your problem is solved and help author by clicking on kudoes
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) Using LV13

  • Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion

    Hi
    without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
    Thanks and regards,
    vairavan

    Dear vairavan,
    You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
    Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
    Regards,
    Sunil Patil

  • New release strategy should not trgger for PO released with old Rel Strategy

    Hi All,
    Please suggest. Po has been fully released with Release Strtgy V1 XX. Now I m replacing release strategy  XX with ZZ. If I change any po which has old rel str XX , system will reset new release strategy as in config changeability indicator 4 maintained.
    But requirement is if there is  any change or value decreasing in fully released Pos with old strategy  it should not retrigger new release strategy. If value Increases then New strategy should retrigger.
    Please help me on this.
    regards,
    Rohit

    HI Rohit
    A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
           -  the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
              case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
              another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
              quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
           -  the document is still subject to the previous release
              strategy,
           -  the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
    The most important thing to consider in to avoid changes to release strategy customizing once the release strategy is used.
    The commom steps are:
    1- make sure all of the old POs should have been released.
    2- don't delete/change the original release strategy. create a new release strategy with copy function, then the old release strategy will not be replaced.
    3- if you delete the original release strategy and add a new release strategy which the characteristics in classification is same as old release strategy then the PO (have been approved) will be replaced with the new release strategy.
    Kind regards,
    Lorraine

  • Document not reported for approval

    I have an urgent issue related to workflow, it is like a lot of document that should report for approval, has not been reported since many days. Now when i am checking the log of the documents it is showing a SWW_WI_ERROR_MESSAGE_SEND_S in technical details of the agent list.
    Can any one help me for the same?

    > And this is the step in WF-Batch.
    >
    So it is a background step. That is (well, at least it can be) significant information. Have you checked that they haven't messed with the authorizations of WF-BATCH?
    > Every document posed after 15 september by a user is having the same problem, workflow is not triggering. And in SM58 it is showing "time limit exceeded".
    >
    So the documents are of different types, it is not restricted to e.g. only purchase orders. Have you checked that the user has normal authorizations (e.g. the same basic roles as another user)?
    I assume you have chekced most of the obvious things, such as the document referred in the workflow actually existing.
    Surely the workflow must be triggering when this problem can be found in the workflow log. What exactly do you mean by that statement - do all the workflows fail early in the process - perhaps even before the first step is created?
    What should the step that fails do? I assume the failure occurs in a customer-developed BOR object type, so please give a bit more information about where the problem occurs.

  • Credit block should not require for Credit card paid sales order

    Dear friends,
    my client want that sales oder with credit card payment should not block sales order for credit management reasons. Hoe can it be configured.
    Regards
    rdc

    Are you using credit card processing in SAP to get the authorization?
    If you are then the authorization should not block the order.
    Or are you using credit card as a form of payment (without authorization) in which case this needs to be put on the customers account as a payment and then the order entered.
    Where are you holding the credit card details?

  • Invoice cancellation should not allow for closed periods

    Dear All,
    We will be closing the posting period for each quarter,and declare the sales figure.,what ever the invoices we have made should not be cancelled in that quarter.,i want the a check in the system that if any cancellation during this quarter which is closed ,should not allow to cancel the invoice.ofcourse the accounting document will not be generated as the posting period is closed but still the invoice is generated and blocked for accounting.i want the creation of billing document should be blocked.
    i Know this can be achieved By defining new routine in VOFA and assign it in VTFL., but is there any standerd routine there which will solve my purpose or i hae to go for new routine.
    REgards
    Shakthi

    Hello Shakthi,
    In standard, there is note 180756.
    Unfortunately the note 180756 just helps for billing creation, it is not useful for
    billing cancellation.
    The note 180756 suggests to develop a copy requirement routine checking
    the periods.
    But in VF11 copy requirement routine are not performed.
    Unfortunately there is not a ready-to-use workaround.
    In transaction VOFA is possible to define a "copy requirement" routine,
    which is performed when the invoice is cancelled.
    You could create a routine doing the necessary check, and put
    it here.
    Regards,
    Alex

  • Partial Delivery should not go for credit hold.

    Hi All,
    When we are creating Partial delivery it is going on credit hold. I want the solution for this so that credit check does not happen at Delivery level.
    Please find the OVA8 settings Mentained below.
    Check                   Reaction      Status/Block    
    Dynamic                   C                 Checked               Horizon   15  T 
    NextReviewDate         A                 Checked              Number of Days      30
    Open Item                 C                 Checked              Max.Open.tem %    10   NoDays openI   15
    OldestOpenitem         A                 Checked              Days oldestItem     120
    Please suggest for the same.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Partial delivery is a exclusion scenario. For this, we have to use credit check user exits. Detailed documentation of the user exit for credit managment is given below. This will help you to achieve solution.
    We can write logic based on VBAP & LIPS table delivered quantity details.
    User Exits For Credit Checks And Risk Management
    Credit Check
    If you want to carry out your own individual credit checks, that differ from those in the standard system, you must define them in the following user exits:
    LVKMPTZZ
    LVKMPFZ1: USER_CREDIT_CHECK1
    LVKMPFZ2: USER_CREDIT_CHECK2
    LVKMPFZ3: USER_CREDIT_CHECK3
    User exit for availability check
    User exit USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT exists in Include MV45AFZF.
    This user exit allows you to determine whether the system should or should not carry out an availability check after a blocked document has been released or after a new credit check
    Regards,
    Shabeer

  • Timecard not going for approval

    I have setup the approval style with HR application set and approval rule of HR Supervisor.
    I have set the approval style preference to my custom approval style.
    But when I submit the timecard it is not going to approval instead it is directly getting saved with status of Approved.
    Any ideas??
    OTL: Defer approval process on timecard submission is set to YES
    PA: AutoApprove Timesheets is set to NO
    Regards
    Shiva

    Make sure your approval style is identified in the Preferences.
    It is.Make sure the Preferences eligibility is correct for this user so that they get the Approval Style preference form this rule and not from any other.
    Checked it is correct.Make sure that the Preferences Rules have an effective start date which is valid for the period of the timecard you submitted.
    Rules effective from 01-JAN-2008.Make sure the subject of the timecard (i.e. the employee) has a supervisor who is effective on the period of the timecard.
    Yes, both records exist.Only thing thats troubling me is that manager is in different BG than that of employee.

  • STO delivery should not happen for shelf life expired material

    Hai all,
    When we are doing PGI for STO-PO. shelf life expired material should not do the delivery.The system should give the error message. but in our system when we do PGI the shelf life expired material is deliverying.
    how do we maintain the error message when we doing PGI.
    Edited by: hemanth s on Sep 12, 2008 9:37 AM

    Hi,
    In Inventory management there is a which helps you "Set expiration Date Check". This allows you to make sure that the shelf life of the material is checked before delivery.
    In Material master, you would need to enter relevant information in the "Plant Data/Stor. 1" tab page (Min remaining shelf life, total shelf life). Also in IMG settings, you need to activate the check for both Plant and movement type. The path is as follows:
    IMG Settings > Material Management > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt > Set Expiration Date Check. TCode: OMJ5
    Cheers.
    Edited by: Sowmya Mohan on Sep 15, 2008 8:43 AM

  • QA32: Without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow for UD

    Hi
    At the time of UD "without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow to save the UD".
    Please suggest how to restrict.
    Regards
    Ashish

    Please go through the below link & with small changes you can fulfill  your requirement using user profile
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601c82e3-b743-2c10-dbb6-ed4c00167157?QuickLink=index&…

  • Error "Data packet not complete; for example, 000013" when reading from PSA

    Dear all,
    I have an issue with my data loading, when i execute my infopackage, i specify that it should be loaded into PSA before going to the data target. in my infopackage request i notice that i have got missing data package
    e.g.
    Data package 1 : everything OK
    Data package 2 : everything OK
    Data package 3 : everything OK
    Data package 8 : everything OK
    Data package 10 : everything OK
    Data package 12 : everything OK
    Data package 13 : everything OK
    what happen to data package inbetween e.g. DP4, DP5 etc etc?
    In my "step by step analysis" under the status tab everything is green and nothing seem to have went wrong, no short dump, no job cancelled, nothing.
    Since everything "seems" to be alright, when i try to update subsequently to the data target, i get the following errors below.
    Data packet not complete; for example, 000013
    Request has errors / is incomplete
    I got 2 questions here...
    1. why do i have missing data package and it still showes me a green idicator?
    2. how can i solve this and is this something i should be worried about?
    Thank you very very much!

    Hii SCHT,
    you encounter these type of errors rarely...
    but in RSMO screen, check for any TRFCs struck..
    also go to the JOB in Source System and analyze the JOBLOG,
    there you can find some information about what tht particular job did..!!!
    and after that check for the same in the BW system...
    perhaps while transferring?extracting the recordsthrough data packages, it might have missed ..
    Force the request RED and repeat the IP again...
    you dont need to worry about anything...simply force the request red and reload.. just let us know if the problem still persists after repeating the load...
    Regards
    Prince

Maybe you are looking for