PO status update in SRM

Hi friends,
We have seen PO's approved and released through w/f. It has been replicated in R/3 but when user sees the status on SRM portal, it shows as 'Error in Process'.
Is there any way we can update that status manually.
Please advice on that. I was looking for any tcode or report or FM which will help me to update that status.
Regards,
Vittalprasad

Try below functions in the order given.
1. BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC
2.BBP_PD_PO_STATUS_CHANGE_WF
Hope it helps.
johnson zavier

Similar Messages

Invoice payment status will update in SRM

Dear Experts,
I have done the invoice in SRM and invoice created in ECC and the same invoice number has been updated in SRM with status 'posted in the backend'.
for thi invoice, i have completed the payment. I would like to know whehter these status will be updated in SRM or not?
Thanks
Ravi

Hi
It is not possible to see, but there is a way. You need to check in ECC in FBL1N for this invoice for the invoice payment. and if you are confirm that no further invoice you need to tick final invoice posted in PO.
With this tick you can confirm the status of the payment.
regards
Satish

PO not updated in SRM

Hi SRM Experts,
We are in SRM2.0 with classic scenario.
The PO created in R/3( from Pur Req.) after Shopping Cart approval is updated back to SRM. This PO is then deleted and another PO is created from the same Pur.Req.
Now the Deleted Status is updated back to the SRM but the newly created PO is not updated even after running BBP_GET_STATUS_2 job.
As the new PO is not updated in SRM, Confirmation is not possible.
Any clue on how to proceed for this issue ?
Thanks & Regards,
Ram

Hi
Please use report CLEAN_REQREQ_UP as well.
See some other useful related links ->
BBP_PDBEI missing item number
Classic scenario: Update shopping cart with changes in backend PO?
Update Document History in Shopping Cart
Mismatch in EBP and backend SAP system
Note 890319 ActualValues in SC from back-end documents are not deleted
Note 631619 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Number of data records updated
Note 636527 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Incorrect references
Note 508819 Status, UI adjustment, BBP_GET_STATUS_2
Note 494036 BBP_GET_STATUS, BBP_STATUS_READ: several problems in backend
Hope this will help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Shooping Cart status update after PO Release

Hello All,
We are using SAP SRM 4.0 classi scenario.
In shopping cart status the follow on document PR and PO are showing once created.
But our requirement is the shopping cart status shold show the follow on document PO once the Final release is approved.
Request your help to meet the above requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Madhan.

Hi,
You mean to say..Final release of PR or PO in the backend then only it hsould update in SRM.
I think it is not poosible. As BBP_GET_STATUS job will take all the SC which are in peding.
Thanks
Venkatesh P

Status update for MeeGo on the N900

Here's a copy of the text sent by Harri Hakulinen from Nokia. He is the project lead for MeeGo on the N900. This message was sent to the MeeGo developer mailing list just now:
Hello MeeGos !
This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valtteri in TSG meeting, we are looking into going more open mode shortly. One reason why we have done this on this way is that at the same time we have been trying to handle opening of many currenly closed components that are needed in MeeGo and to build feasible MeeGo images for N900.
However, a lot of related work is already done completely open, you can find more info from places like ofono.org, connman.net and meego.gitorious.org . So if you are eager to contribute or want to closely follow whats happening, please work on those.
As you know, we have delivered working MeeGo images for N900 as part of first code drop in the end of March. At that state we were using older kernel version on N900 than on Atom side, as we used the same kernel (.28) than what is used in Maemo 5 based products today. We ended up doing that simply because lack of time to contribute and port all the drivers to the newer kernels.
Now, for the upcoming May release of MeeGo, we are going to use the same kernel version (.33) than Atom based devices are using. For that we need to submit number of ARM-architecture patches to MeeGo as well, because many of the required ones have just been contibuted upstream kernel and were not available in .33 version originally.
We have already enabled most of the main drivers, like LCD, GFX, Wlan and BT. Still, there is a lot to do in order to enable .33 on N900, like audio drivers, and modem subsystem including SSI buss driver, modem data and audio drivers etc. Our adaptation guys are in fact contributing those modem subsystem related drivers as we speak, and if you are following kernel mailing lists you can see how that goes on.
Besides of enabling the new kernel, we are working with number of smaller and bigger issues for N900. Starting from the beginning, we are now based on ARMv7 combiled code, so the code should be better optimised for N900 now. ARMv5 compilation that was in use for code drop will still be there, and it also seems to be used at least by community project that is planning to release MeeGo for good old N810 tablets
Also, we are planning to enable dual booting of Maemo 5 and MeeGo for the upcoming release. So that will be offered as 3rd way to setup MeeGo to N900, including the existing "native" MeeGo only on N900 and chroot based MeeGo on Maemo 5 setups. Taking the dual boot mode into use likely includes upgrade to Maemo5 kernel as well, but that should not be big issue in the process of enabling that.
As I don't want to go ahead of others working on MeeGo architecture and other issues I will stop now, but I will report again when we have more to tell about the subject.
Br,
// Harri

Here's another update..
It seems that MeeGo on the N900 is not directly being driven by Nokia! It's an open project.. so the net result is MeeGo on the N900 may look and feel very different to Meego on the N900's sucessor
Either way, I'm certainly greatful for their efforts!
Hello Meego's,
As indicated in my previous mail about "MeeGo for N900" status, we were planning to open up our MeeGo work around N900. Now I am happy to announce, that we are there
First, to make it absolute clear for everybody: This is about open MeeGo adaptation to N900 device.
Like any other MeeGo project, it is open source project for all applicaple purposes, and does NOT directly have links to any potential Nokia product or potential product plans. So, based on this or any other of my posts, please do NOT start or continue speculation of upcoming Nokia MeeGo releases. That is practically not helpfull, and mostly only takes our time when we need to explain our words and actions in detail to various directions.
From our part, we are trying to implement the open development model that has been discussed now so many times around MeeGo. On practical terms, we are trying to work based on proposal by Carsten Munk, see
http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_Best_Practices_for_working_in_a_MeeGo_team
We have already created some resources that will be used by the team, you can learn about those and the upcoming ones from http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900. We have IRC channel for realtime discussion, we will use meego-dev mailing list for normal discussions and announcements, and we will have Gitorius project for code.
We will evolve our practicies during the work, so if you are interested, stay tuned to those channels. I belive that soon we are also able to figure out, what is best way for community members to help us in development, and then effectively be part of the team.
I would also like to use this as opportunity to introduce the team behind this work (so far) and also thank them about their hard work and long hours. We have team that consist of some Nokia subcontractors and also growing team of Nokia personel:
"MeeGo for N900" team (so far)
- Cybercom Turku team; Marko Saukko, Jouni Peltonen, Sami Sirkiä, Jari Smura and Luka Milovanov.
- Cybercom Tampere team; Kalle Lampila,Teemu Tuominen,Tuukka Mäkinen and Ville Marjusaari.
- Carsten Munk via Nomovok
- Jarkko Nikula via Atomide
- Jan-Simon Möller from Linuxfoundation
- Nokia team; Alexander Kanevskiy, Felipe Contreras, Markus Lehtonen, Ameya Palande, Sakari Poussa, Roger Quadros and me.
In addition to official project team, many Nokia people have helped us despite their hectic daily work, even with their free time. Most of them are driven by the desire to open, repurpose and upstream all relevant sw that has been originally created for Maemo 5 based N900 product during previous years.
Marko, Jouni, Sami & Luka and Markus were working with me already on last year when we did prototypes and interoperability tests of Maemo & Moblin stuff combined in different ways. Based on those we had pretty good picture of what we are doing and why.
And of course, we have had very good and productive co-operation with various Intel teams since those times. Anas Nashif and many others from Intel's MeeGo team have done a lot for us by enabling ARM stuff in MeeGo OBS and repositories.
Last but not least, I want to give special thanks to Stskeeps (alias Carsten Munk . He has teached us how to operate on open, and he has also done respectable amount of this work since early days of Meego. In addition to that, I belive that his earlier work on Maemo community and on Mer project has in fact inspired all of us and shown a way to MeeGo alredy years ago.
Br,
//Harri

Unable to run bapis for project status update and date update together

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to update the dates and status of a project WBS at level 4. I am trying to do update the CJ02 Transaction using standard BAPI available. I need to do both Date update and status update in the same LOOP PASS   i am using the below mention bapi. when i am doing so i am getting an error Project 'A._____' has been currently processed by ID i.e. my id.
I have tried putting a wait for 2 seconds in the code but its still not working. please find the order below in which i am calling the bapi.
Loop at itab.
if date_changed = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN'
      READ TABLE it_error WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
Commit
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
   endif.
endif.
if Status_change = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION' .
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2054_SET_STATUS'
      READ TABLE t_result WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
             TABLES
                  et_return = t_ret.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
     ENDIF.
endif.
    WAIT UP TO 4 SECONDS.
endloop.

Try to use
SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL.
before each BAPI call.
Did you try to debug through your code, leaving sufficient time between BAPI calls? If it does work like that, then the above statement might help.

Delivery status update in sales document at PGI

Normally system updates the delivery status of sales document line level, when a delivery document is created with respect to that sales document line.
But I want system to update the delivery status (in sales doc. line) when PGI is done for respective delivery document; not at the creation of delivery document. Below I have shown the status updating scenarios that I expect.
Scenario 1
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: Not done
Status in Sales document line should be A (Open)
Scenario 2
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: 50 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be B (Partially delivered)
Scenario 3
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 100 PCs
PGI: 100 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be C (Fully delivered)
Can anyone propose a possible way of doing this (configuration/ user exits/ BADI etc,)?
Thanks,
Ramindu

Hi,
I dont know it with the use of ABAP development, but by functional logic, can suggest you to configure the rush order sales configuration for your particular sales order.
just check that availability of that particualar sales order is met or not prior to it.
and then automatically when your delivery doc is created, PGI would be done and the status of your sales order would be updated with it.
try it out on your development client, if it works out.
regards,
Siddharth.

HT4314 hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

And the answer is:
williamfromlongueuil wrote:
we have the same itunes account in game center
You need to have your own account... DUH....

Status Update of Service Order From Billing Document

Dear Experts,
I am told to change the User status of Service Order once the Billing Document is Generated.
Here we are in CRM 2007 and i have done the status update of previous document but here
Billing document is not possible to read through CRM_ORDER_READ (function module).
Do any one have any idea how do i proceed.
Thanks,
SA

hi sa
to change the service order user status , when biling document is generated
make an implementation of bill_acc_if bai and in the method ENRICH_ACC_DOCUMENT
read order data using crm_order_read and change the status using
CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN
thnks
sam

Can´t access my files on Creative Cloud. "Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon." "We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay. Check back later or visit our website for status updates. In addition, you can get he

Hello,
For a few days I have been trying to access my files on Creative Cloud web without success. I´ve got this message only:
"Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon."
"We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay.
Check back later or visit our website for status updates.
In addition, you can get help in the forums of the Creative Cloud.
Thank you for understanding!"
(I used Google Translate)
Somebody help?

You do not need ?&promoid=KRUVP at the end of the url but it should not matter.
One thing to check is if your hosts file is modified. Open the Command Prompt and type: notepad %systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
This will open a read-only copy of your host file in Notepad. Are there any entries in this file regarding adobe.com?
The other thing you can do is open the Developer Tools in the Chrome browser. On Windows press Ctrl + Shift to open them. Switch to the Network tab. Reload the page by pressing Ctrl + r. Check for any 4xx or 5xx errors which should be colored red.
Post screenshots of your results or send me a private forum message with the information.

Report on "Status updates history"

Hi,
i need to check if resource are updating task from "My Task". Is it possible to estract a report on "Status updates history"?
I mean this type of data:
Approval Date
Action
Status
Info
Task Name
Project
Type
Start
Finish
Actual Work
Remaining Work
% Complete
Assigned To
Approved By
Thanks
Daniele

Hi Daniel,
You will probably have to create a join with the MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS Table.
See reference here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/project_programmability/archive/2008/01/03/statusing-transactions-partial-documentation.aspx
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

BBM status update is extra sensitive....

I have been facing problem with BBM status update and display name screens.
They are extar sensitive and change immediately before you actually decide to press enter.
Any solutions?

Good day
Welcome to BB forums
I never seen or heard of something like that happening!
may I ask what OS your running now?
Want to contract me? You can follow me on Twitter @RobGambino
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Ios 8 photos won't upload in safari to facebook status update

Installed iOS 8. I use Safari to access Facebook.com. photos will no longer upload to Facebook status update.

Stan, did they infer it only 'may' get fixed?
Surely they Have to fix this very Major issue or they'll go bust!
I'd never trust them again.
Do you have the email address of Apple?
Or know if they've made any public statements concerning this problem.
the other issues, like caps coming on and off or slower speeds I can live with but not being able to upload images is a major problem. If not fixed it would render my iPad virtually useless to me.

Status updates

How would i be able to delete my status updates on skype so that my parents wont see them when they have me log into my skype account?

Ok, I understand.
Open your BBM app.
Swipe down from the top edge to Settings.
Scroll down towards the bottom and tap on Blocked Contacts and Updates.
Tap the Updates tab at the top.
On the contact whose updates you have hidden, tap and hold on that contact, and tap the trash can icon (to remove the hidden status, this will not delete the contact)
This will remove the contact from the Hide Status updates.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Status updates history period default

Hi
Is there any way to change the default status updates history date range from 3 months please? Currently as the status approver for a major change program I'm getting several hundred tasks to approve every day across multiple project plans; the problem
is that when I go in to clear down to run my weekly reports it lists every task submission for the last 3 months. The thing is, IE can take several minutes before it displays the page in full as it chews through all of the data which is annoying
to say the least.
I'd quite like it to show only the last 3 weeks, not the last 3 months.
Does anyone have any suggestions please?
Thanks.

Hi,
As far as I tested, changing the default 3 months range from the date range feature will unfortunaltely not be kept in your IE cache next time you'll navigate to the status update history page. Thus you'll have to set it again every time you access
the page.
I guess this 3 months default value might be changed programmabily but I can't help on this.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

PO status update in SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for